Exploring the Relationship between Reading Motivation and Reading Comprehension

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102). This special issue belongs to the section "Education and Psychology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2023) | Viewed by 913

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Education, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
Interests: measurement of reading motivation; reading frequency and engagement; dropout prevention

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Motivation to read is a critical contributor to reading comprehension and can explain unique variance in comprehension that cognitive variables cannot. Past research and meta-analyses have indicated time and again that these two variables are at least moderately related. However, that relationship is complicated. First, the relationship may be stronger or weaker depending on how one operationalizes and measures reading motivation. Second, the relationship may be partly explained by mediating variables, such as frequency of reading. Third, variables such as grade level, gender identity, and learning disabilities may moderate the relationship. Finally, there have been questions regarding the directionality of this relationship, which has been examined through longitudinal analysis.

Although we already know quite a bit about the relationship between these variables, there is still more to learn. Therefore, this is a call for manuscripts that detail original research that builds upon these past findings to bring new insights into the relationship between these two variables.

Research areas may include (but are not limited to) the following:

  • Examination of mediating variables explaining the relationship between reading motivation and comprehension.
  • Examination of variables moderating the relationship between reading motivation and comprehension.
  • Comparison of the strength of relationship between multiple constructs of reading motivation with comprehension.
  • Examination of the relationship between reading motivation and comprehension for understudied populations.
  • Longitudinal studies examining how the relationship changes over time.

Tentative completion schedule:

Abstract submission deadline: 31 July 2023
Notification of abstract acceptance: 31 August 2023
Full manuscript deadline: 31 December 2023

I look forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Marcia Davis
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • reading motivation
  • comprehension
  • longitudinal analysis
  • mediating variables
  • moderating variables

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

24 pages, 1571 KiB  
Article
Situative Black Girlhood Reading Motivations: Why and How Black Girls Read and Comprehend Text
by Sara Jones
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(5), 474; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050474 - 30 Apr 2024
Viewed by 644
Abstract
This study aims to illustrate the complex relationships between reading motivation and reading comprehension for Black girl readers. There is an urgent need for research that explicitly centers on the reading motivations of Black girls through a humanizing, asset-oriented lens. Through a Situative [...] Read more.
This study aims to illustrate the complex relationships between reading motivation and reading comprehension for Black girl readers. There is an urgent need for research that explicitly centers on the reading motivations of Black girls through a humanizing, asset-oriented lens. Through a Situative Black Girlhood Reading Motivations lens, which integrates a situative perspective on motivation and the tenets of Black Girlhood Studies, this multi-year study focuses on a group of Black girl readers participating in a summer reading program. Qualitative data, including video observations, student work artifacts, and small-group artifact-elicited interviews, were analyzed through a generic inductive approach to answer the research question, “How are relationships between Black girls’ reading motivations and their reading comprehension evident in their reading engagement and enactments?” The findings demonstrate that the participants’ most salient reading motivations in this instructional context (meaning-oriented, collaborative, and liberatory reading motivations) (1) were a precursor to their comprehension, (2) worked in tandem with their comprehension, and (3) stemmed from their comprehension. These findings contribute to models of reading by illustrating the need for additional complexity when describing the relationship between reading motivation and comprehension. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop