Literacy, Motivation and Education among Prison Populations

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 June 2021) | Viewed by 15143

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychosocial Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Interests: prison education; self-efficacy; reading and writing skills

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychosocial Science, Faculty of psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Interests: prison education; self-efficacy; motivation

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are planning a Special Issue for the journal Education Sciences to be titled Literacy, motivation and education among prison populations. Adequate reading and spelling skills are pivotal for mastering education and an important part of the right to education is the opportunity to acquire and develop literacy skills throughout life. A common understanding of literacy is that it is a set of tangible skills, particularly the cognitive skills of reading and writing (UNESCO, 2006). According to the United Nations (2002), literacy is crucial to the acquisition of essential life skills that enable every child, youth, and adult to address the challenges they may face in life. Thus, research‐based knowledge on, for example, a vulnerable population such as prisoners’ basic reading and writing levels is important, because it determines the starting point for an education that can benefit both the individual and society. Across nations, a high proportion of prisoners have a low level of literacy skills (e.g., Morgan and Kett, 2003; Rampey et al., 2016) and  also a large body of evidence exists on the prevalence of reading and writing difficulties among prisoners across various countries. (e.g., Moody et al., 2000; Asbjørnsen, Jones, Eikeland, and Manger, 2016;  Svensson, 2011; Elbeheri, Everatt, & Al Malki, 2009). Many prisoners’ motives for education are formed through reflections about the future and a desire to be better able to cope with life after release (Manger, Eikeland, Diseth, Hetland, and Asbjørnsen, 2010). Callan and Gardner (2005) found highly motivated prisoners engaging in and completing vocational education and training programmes that developed their technical skills, self-esteem and broader sets of generic skills.

References

Asbjørnsen, A. E., Jones, L. Ø., Eikeland, O. J., & Manger, T. (2016). Spørreskjema om voksnes lesing (SLV) som screeninginstrument for leseferdigheter: Erfaringer fra bruk i en survey blant norske innsatte [Questionnaire about adults reading as a screening instrument for reading skills: Experiences from a survey among Norwegian prisoners]. Norsk Tidsskrift for logopedi, 62, 14–25.

Callan & Gardner (2005). Vocational education and training provision and recidivism in Queensland correctional institutions. National Centre for Vocational Education Research. Australia

Elbeheri, G., Everatt, J., & Al Malki, M. (2009). The incidence of dyslexia among young offenders in Kuwait. Dyslexia, 15, 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.361

Manger, T., Eikeland, O.J., Diseth, Å., Hetland, H., & Asbjørnsen, A.E. (2010). Prison inmates’ educational motives: Are they pushed or pulled? Scandinavian Journal of Eductional Research, 54, 535-547

Moody, K. C., Holzer, C. E., Roman, M. J., Paulsen, K. A., Freeman, D. H., Haynes, M., & James, T. N. (2000). Prevalence of dyslexia among Texas prison inmates. Texas Medicine, 96, 69–75.

Morgan, M., & Kett, M. (2003). The prison adult literacy survey. Results and implications. Dublin, Ireland: Irish Prison Service.

Rampey, B. D., Keiper, T., Mohadjer, L., Krenzke, T., Li, J., Thornton, N., & Hogan, J. (2016). Highlights from the U.S. PIAAC survey of incarcerated adults: Their skills, work experience, education, and training. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Educational Statistics.

Svensson, I., Lundberg, I., & Jacobson, C. (2001). The prevalence of reading and spelling difficulties among inmates of institutions for compulsory care of juvenile delinquents. Dyslexia, 7, 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.178

UNESCO (2006). Education for All Global Monitoring Report. Retrieved from http://www. unesco.org/education/GMR2006/full/chapt6_eng.pdf

United Nations (2002). United Nations Literacy Decade: Education for all. Retrieved September 30, 2017, from http://www.un‐documents.net/a56r116.htm

Assoc. Prof. Lise Øen Jones
Prof. Emiritus Terje Manger
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Prison population
  • Literacy
  • Education
  • Motivation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

12 pages, 241 KiB  
Article
A Cross-Sectional Study of Educational Aspects and Self-Reported Learning Difficulties among Female Prisoners in Norway
by Lise Øen Jones, Leila Våland Tveit, Arve Asbjørnsen, Ole Johan Eikeland, Hilde Hetland and Terje Manger
Educ. Sci. 2021, 11(6), 277; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060277 - 3 Jun 2021
Viewed by 2450
Abstract
The aim of this cross-sectional study was to analyse the educational background, educational desires and participation in education among three samples of female prisoners with Norwegian citizenship in Norwegian prisons over the period from 2009 to 2015. The female participants were n = [...] Read more.
The aim of this cross-sectional study was to analyse the educational background, educational desires and participation in education among three samples of female prisoners with Norwegian citizenship in Norwegian prisons over the period from 2009 to 2015. The female participants were n = 106 in 2009, n = 74 in 2012 and n = 79 in 2015, respectively, with a mean age of 38 years. Moreover, the study examined whether self-reported learning difficulties could predict participation in education activity while incarcerated. The results show that the female prisoners included in this study increased their educational level over the studied years. Similar education patterns were observed in the 2009 and 2012 samples regarding all educational levels for the female prisoners. A different pattern was observed in the 2015 data, with 44.3 % having mandatory education as their highest level compared to 57.6 in 2009 and 53.4 in 2012, respectively. However, these differences in percent between the samples at any education level were not significant. Significant differences were, however, found regarding the desire for upper secondary education between the samples in 2009 and 2012, and 2009 and 2015, respectively. In 2009, 20.2% reported upper secondary education as an educational desire, whereas 35.2% reported this as a desire in 2012, and 36.7% in 2015. Participation in educational activity during incarceration also changed during the time period of these studies. Many of the female prisoners participate in educational activity, but a significant difference was found between the samples in 2012 and 2015 as there was a decrease in activity. In 2012, 41.9% did not participate, whereas in 2015, almost 60% (58.2) of the female prisoners did not participate in any educational activity. Both the highest completed education level and self-reported learning difficulties predicted participation in education activity among the female prisoners in the 2015 sample. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Literacy, Motivation and Education among Prison Populations)
19 pages, 2072 KiB  
Article
Can a Questionnaire Be Useful for Assessing Reading Skills in Adults? Experiences with the Adult Reading Questionnaire among Incarcerated and Young Adults in Norway
by Arve E. Asbjørnsen, Lise Øen Jones, Ole Johan Eikeland and Terje Manger
Educ. Sci. 2021, 11(4), 154; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040154 - 29 Mar 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2651
Abstract
Background: Good screening tools can be of immense value in educational counselling for adults. We report two studies where we explored the factor structure and discriminative power of the Adult Reading Questionnaire (ARQ) in different samples of young adults at risk for reading [...] Read more.
Background: Good screening tools can be of immense value in educational counselling for adults. We report two studies where we explored the factor structure and discriminative power of the Adult Reading Questionnaire (ARQ) in different samples of young adults at risk for reading impairments. Method: The ARQ was designed to screen for literacy skills with low resource requirement. The instrument includes 11 questions regarding reading and writing skills and 6 questions regarding attention deficits and hyperactivity. The first study included of 246 undergraduate students. One-third of the sample were under assessment of specific learning impairments/dyslexia. The second study included 1475 incarcerated adults, where 1 in 4 reported specific reading impairments. Results: Principal Component Analyses (PCA) with varimax rotation returned four components for the participants in Study 1: Reading skills, Reading habits, Attention, and Hyperactivity. For the incarcerated sample in Study 2, the analysis returned three components, as the Attention and Hyperactivity items were combined. Conclusion: The ARQ is useful for identifying individuals at risk for dyslexia with acceptable measures of sensitivity and specificity, as well as for identifying those who report difficulties with reading and writing but have not been assessed for their difficulties earlier. The increased prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) seen among incarcerated adults must be considered when screening for reading problems as it may confound the scores on reading questionnaires. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Literacy, Motivation and Education among Prison Populations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 742 KiB  
Article
Distance Education for Dutch Citizens Detained Abroad: A Mixed-Methods Case Study of the Foundation ‘Education behind Foreign Bars’
by Dorien Brosens, Silke Marynissen, Frans Lemmers and Flore Croux
Educ. Sci. 2021, 11(2), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020041 - 23 Jan 2021
Viewed by 1938
Abstract
Foreign national prisoners have less educational opportunities than national prisoners. Therefore, the Dutch foundation ‘Education behind Foreign Bars’ (Eabt) provides distance education to Dutch nationals detained abroad. A mixed-methods case study is carried out to gain insight into the perspective of professionals and [...] Read more.
Foreign national prisoners have less educational opportunities than national prisoners. Therefore, the Dutch foundation ‘Education behind Foreign Bars’ (Eabt) provides distance education to Dutch nationals detained abroad. A mixed-methods case study is carried out to gain insight into the perspective of professionals and volunteers who are involved with Eabt and of the students taking a course from Eabt. This study consists of individual interviews with volunteers and professionals and pre- and post-surveys among students. The qualitative results show that following a course from Eabt happens in three steps: (1) Informing, (2) applying for the course, and (3) starting with the course, doing homework, and being assessed. During the course, students receive motivational and content-related support from the Netherlands and, depending on the local prison context, also from the detaining country. The professionals and volunteers identify various success factors and challenges of Eabt. The quantitative results demonstrate that students are primarily motivated to participate by their wish to acquire knowledge and skills and to prepare for life after detention. The students are satisfied about the support received and they seem to have more confidence in the future due to the course. Overall, Eabt is highly valued by both students, professionals, and volunteers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Literacy, Motivation and Education among Prison Populations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

25 pages, 2102 KiB  
Review
Disorders of Language and Literacy in the Prison Population: A Scoping Review
by Frøydis Morken, Lise Øen Jones and Wenche Andersen Helland
Educ. Sci. 2021, 11(2), 77; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020077 - 14 Feb 2021
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 7245
Abstract
Language and literacy skills are essential for education, school achievements, work and social conditions. Some studies indicate an elevated incidence of problems with language and literacy in the prison population, potentially contributing to increased risks of maladjustment and recidivism. In general, the bulk [...] Read more.
Language and literacy skills are essential for education, school achievements, work and social conditions. Some studies indicate an elevated incidence of problems with language and literacy in the prison population, potentially contributing to increased risks of maladjustment and recidivism. In general, the bulk of research on language and literacy has been directed towards children and adolescents. This study aimed to map the extent of the literature on language and literacy disorders in the adult prison population over the past 20 years, and what it reveals about the prevalence and nature of these disorders in prisoners. In total, 18 studies were identified. Of these, the majority (15) investigated literacy. The three studies investigating language all reported an elevated prevalence in the population. The literacy studies were altogether less clear, due to differences in theoretical approach and methods. In terms of the nature of the disorders, many studies assessed the behavioral level only. Results are discussed in terms of theoretical approaches, as well as recommendations for research, assessment, and intervention. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Literacy, Motivation and Education among Prison Populations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop