Using Technology to Foster Excellence in Mathematics and Science Education

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102). This special issue belongs to the section "Technology Enhanced Education".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 1 December 2024 | Viewed by 2517

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Community Innovation and Education, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA
Interests: mathematics education; technology in education; simulation in education

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Teaching and Learning, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA
Interests: science education; technology in science education; simulation in education

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Developments in technology have transformed the delivery of education at all levels. In this Special Issue of Education Sciences, the intent is to focus on two subject areas, mathematics education and science education, allowing authors to inform readers about how a particular technology came to be used to foster excellence in learning, describe the unique implementation of the technology, and share data indicating the learning of mathematics and/or science knowledge so concepts are achieved more efficiently or more completely. Authors are invited to extrapolate from their experience with a particular technology to provide a futurist’s view of how new technology, such as artificial intelligence (AI), may continue to change the way technology is used to foster mathematics and science learning for all.

The aim of this Special Issue is to contribute to the current literature by highlighting science and mathematics teachers’ use of technology with their students in and out of the classroom. The use of technology should facilitate and elevate learning experiences and use strategies that are known to maximize student access, engagement, and student learning.

Aim and Scope

This Special Issue will contribute to the current literature by:

  • Identifying and highlighting existing practices as well as recent innovations and potential uses of technology in the science and mathematics classroom.
  • Describing the historical use of technology in the classroom, noting progressions, stalls, and significant leaps forward due to technological innovations and limiting factors that prevent greater technology adoption in the classroom.
  • Identifying and describing examples of using technology in the classroom.

Themes

Possible topics include but are not limited to:

  • Data collection tools for intensive data analysis;
  • Use of software for increasing individual and group student engagement;
  • How technology facilitates student participation in Citizen Science experiences;
  • The psychological foundations that drive the use of gaming software and best practices in the field;
  • The anticipated benefits and dangers of using AI in the classroom that are related to student learning;
  • Descriptions of how technology supports the self-motivated learner for explorations that go well beyond the classroom experience;
  • Descriptions of how technology is used to provide quality instructions to learners with special needs. 

Prof. Dr. Michael C. Hynes
Prof. Dr. Craig Berg
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • technology
  • teacher education
  • mathematics education
  • science education
  • student access
  • student success
  • student learning
  • internet
  • gaming
  • media
  • devices

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

21 pages, 1875 KiB  
Article
Science and Mathematics Teachers’ Integration of TPACK in STEM Subjects in Qatar: A Structural Equation Modeling Study
by Nasser Mansour, Ziad Said, Mustafa Çevik and Abdullah Abu-Tineh
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(10), 1138; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101138 - 21 Oct 2024
Viewed by 747
Abstract
This study aimed to explore how secondary school science and mathematics teachers in Qatar integrate Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) into their teaching practices. The study examined the relationships between the subcomponents of TPACK using structural equation modeling (SEM), complemented by an analysis [...] Read more.
This study aimed to explore how secondary school science and mathematics teachers in Qatar integrate Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) into their teaching practices. The study examined the relationships between the subcomponents of TPACK using structural equation modeling (SEM), complemented by an analysis of additional categorical variables. A total of 245 science and mathematics teachers from Qatar participated in the research. The model’s findings showed that the internal components—technological knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and content knowledge—had a significant and positive direct effect on the external factors: technological pedagogical knowledge, technological content knowledge, and pedagogical content knowledge. However, these internal components did not directly impact TPACK itself. Together, these variables accounted for 77% of the variance in TPACK. Among the findings, Technological Content Knowledge (TCK) emerged as one of the most influential variables affecting TPACK, emphasizing its importance in teachers’ TPACK integration. On the other hand, it was found that Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) did not have a direct and significant effect on TPACK. Categorical variables like certificates and postgraduate education significantly impact TPACK and its subcomponents, while gender, field of study, and teaching experience do not. This finding underscores the importance of structured training and postgraduate education in enhancing TPACK skills for science and mathematics teachers. Participation in technology-based certification programs and postgraduate studies in STEM is crucial for their TPACK development in teaching STEM subjects. Future studies could explore the long-term impact of structured, technology-based training programs on enhancing STEM teachers’ TPACK development and assess how this improvement influences student learning outcomes in science and mathematics classrooms. This would provide deeper insights into the effectiveness of such programs and their potential to transform teaching practices and student achievement in STEM education. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1851 KiB  
Article
Expanding Models for Physics Teaching: A Framework for the Integration of Computational Modeling
by Rebecca Elizabeth Vieyra, Colleen Megowan-Romanowicz, Kathi Fisler, Benjamin S. Lerner, Joe Gibbs Politz and Shriram Krishnamurthi
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(8), 861; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080861 - 8 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1218
Abstract
Teaching computation in science courses can enhance science education, but doing so requires that teachers expand the vision of their discipline beyond the traditional view of science presented in most curricula. This article describes a design-based research (DBR) program that included collaboration among [...] Read more.
Teaching computation in science courses can enhance science education, but doing so requires that teachers expand the vision of their discipline beyond the traditional view of science presented in most curricula. This article describes a design-based research (DBR) program that included collaboration among high school teachers and professional development leaders in physics and computer science education. Through three years of professional development and teacher-led development, field testing, and refinement of integrated curricular resources, we have combined instructional modeling practices, physical lab materials, and computer programming activities. One of the outcomes is a co-created framework for the integration of computational modeling into physics that is sensitive to teachers’ interests and expressed needs in addition to learning goals. This framework merges two evidence-based approaches to teaching: Bootstrap:Algebra, a web-based computing curriculum that emphasizes using multiple representations of functions and scaffolds that make the programming process explicit, and Modeling Instruction in physics, an approach that emphasizes the use of conceptual models, modeling practices and representational tools. In doing so, we uncover the need to balance teachers’ visions for integration opportunities with practical instructional needs and emphasize that frameworks for integration need to reflect teachers’ values and goals. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Planned Papers

The below list represents only planned manuscripts. Some of these manuscripts have not been received by the Editorial Office yet. Papers submitted to MDPI journals are subject to peer-review.

Title: Supporting Physics Teacher Change: Modeling Instruction with Computational Thinking

Abstract: Teaching computation in science courses can enhance science education, but doing so requires that teachers expand the vision of their discipline beyond the traditional view of science presented in most curricula. This paper describes a design-based research (DBR) program that included collaboration among high school teachers and professional development leaders in physics and computer science education. Four years of professional development and teacher-led development, field testing, and refinement of integrated curricular resources, have led to a co-created framework for the integration of computational modeling into physics that is sensitive to teachers’ interests and expressed needs in addition to learning goals. This framework merges two evidence-based approaches to teaching: Bootstrap:Algebra, a computing curriculum that emphasizes using multiple representations of functions and scaffolds that make the programming process explicit, and Modeling Instruction in physics, an approach that emphasizes the use of conceptual models, modeling practices and representational tools. In doing so, we uncover the need to balance teachers’ visions for integration opportunities with practical instructional needs and emphasize that frameworks for integration need to reflect teachers’ values and goals.

Back to TopTop