energies-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Advances in Carbon Capture and Storage and Renewable Energy Systems

A special issue of Energies (ISSN 1996-1073). This special issue belongs to the section "B3: Carbon Emission and Utilization".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 August 2024 | Viewed by 6184

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Engineering, School of Digital, Technologies and Arts (DTA), Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 2DE, UK
Interests: carbon capture and storage (CCS); low carbon and renewable energy systems; net zero buildings; micro combined heat and power (Micro-CHP)
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Engineering, School of Digital, Technologies and Arts (DTA), Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 2DE, UK
Interests: digital signal processing; telecommunications; data acquisition systems; wireless sensor networks (WSN) and image/video processing

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

To achieve net-zero targets by the middle of the century, it is essential to employ combinations of low-carbon and renewable energy technologies in different sectors including energy, residential, transportation, industry, etc. Net zero is all about ‘balancing’ or cancelling out any carbon we produce from a product or service. We reach net zero when the amount of greenhouse gas we produce is no more than the amount taken away. This Special Issue is seeking advanced research works on carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) and renewable energy systems and a combination of different net-zero scenarios in achieving carbon neutrality targets and meeting energy sustainability standards by 2050.

Prof. Dr. Hamidreza Gohari Darabkhani
Prof. Dr. Abdel-Hamid Soliman
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Energies is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • carbon capture and storage
  • low-carbon energy
  • renewable energy systems
  • net-zero emission
  • energy sustainability.

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

18 pages, 4513 KiB  
Article
Combined Analytic Hierarchy Process and Weighted Interval Method Models for the Geological Evaluation of CO2 Storage in Coal Goaf
by Dongzhuang Hou, Yifei Xiao, Lang Liu and Chao Huan
Energies 2024, 17(11), 2672; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17112672 - 31 May 2024
Viewed by 307
Abstract
The increasing concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere is a major factor contributing to climate change. CO2 storage in coal goaf is a convenient, effective, and economical solution. Methods to quickly and effectively evaluate geological conditions are urgently required. The main [...] Read more.
The increasing concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere is a major factor contributing to climate change. CO2 storage in coal goaf is a convenient, effective, and economical solution. Methods to quickly and effectively evaluate geological conditions are urgently required. The main influencing factors are geological safety, storage potential, economics, and environmental protection; these include 4 aspects, 38 indexes, and 4 index levels that can be quantified using classification levels. We established a geological evaluation model, using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and weighted interval methods. AHP was used to determine its elements, indicators, and inter-layer relationships, as well as to clarify its structural relationships. The weight interval method is used to evaluate unstable elements, reducing their difficulty, and constant values are used to assign weights of stable elements to increase accuracy. This model was applied to assess the suitability of the goaf in Yaojie mine for geological CO2 storage. The results revealed that this goaf is an above average CO2 storage space, which was consistent with previous research. This geological CO2 storage evaluation model may also be used to assess the CO2 storage suitability of other coal goafs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Carbon Capture and Storage and Renewable Energy Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 1696 KiB  
Article
Feasibility of Green Hydrogen-Based Synthetic Fuel as a Carbon Utilization Option: An Economic Analysis
by J. Lemuel Martin and S. Viswanathan
Energies 2023, 16(17), 6399; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16176399 - 4 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1461
Abstract
Singapore has committed to achieving net zero emissions by 2050, which requires the pursuit of multiple decarbonization pathways. CO2 utilization methods such as fuel production may provide a fast interim solution for carbon abatement. This paper evaluates the feasibility of green hydrogen-based [...] Read more.
Singapore has committed to achieving net zero emissions by 2050, which requires the pursuit of multiple decarbonization pathways. CO2 utilization methods such as fuel production may provide a fast interim solution for carbon abatement. This paper evaluates the feasibility of green hydrogen-based synthetic fuel (synfuel) production as a method for utilizing captured CO2. We consider several scenarios: a baseline scenario with no changes, local production of synfuel with hydrogen imports, and overseas production of synfuel with CO2 exports. This paper aims to determine a CO2 price for synfuel production, evaluate the economic viability of local versus overseas production, and investigate the effect of different cost parameters on economic viability. Using the current literature, we estimate the associated production and transport costs under each scenario. We introduce a CO2 utilization price (CUP) that estimates the price of utilizing captured CO2 to produce synfuel, and an adjusted CO2 utilization price (CCUP) that takes into account the avoided emissions from crude oil-based fuel production. We find that overseas production is more economically viable compared to local production, with the best case CCUP bounds giving a range of 142–148 $/tCO2 in 2050 if CO2 transport and fuel shipping costs are low. This is primarily due to the high cost of hydrogen feedstock, especially the transport cost, which can offset the combined costs of CO2 transport and fuel shipping. In general, we find that any increase in the hydrogen feedstock cost can significantly affect the CCUP for local production. Sensitivity analysis reveals that hydrogen transport cost has a significant impact on the viability of local production and if this cost is reduced significantly, local production can be cheaper than overseas production. The same is true if the economies of scale for local production is significantly better than overseas production. A significantly lower carbon capture cost can also the reduce the CCUP significantly. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Carbon Capture and Storage and Renewable Energy Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1343 KiB  
Article
Perspectives of Biogas Plants as BECCS Facilities: A Comparative Analysis of Biomethane vs. Biohydrogen Production with Carbon Capture and Storage or Use (CCS/CCU)
by Johannes Full, Silja Hohmann, Sonja Ziehn, Edgar Gamero, Tobias Schließ, Hans-Peter Schmid, Robert Miehe and Alexander Sauer
Energies 2023, 16(13), 5066; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16135066 - 30 Jun 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2377
Abstract
The transition to a carbon-neutral economy requires innovative solutions that reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and promote sustainable energy production. Additionally, carbon dioxide removal technologies are urgently needed. The production of biomethane or biohydrogen with carbon dioxide capture and storage are two promising [...] Read more.
The transition to a carbon-neutral economy requires innovative solutions that reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and promote sustainable energy production. Additionally, carbon dioxide removal technologies are urgently needed. The production of biomethane or biohydrogen with carbon dioxide capture and storage are two promising BECCS approaches to achieve these goals. In this study, we compare the advantages and disadvantages of these two approaches regarding their technical, economic, and environmental performance. Our analysis shows that while both approaches have the potential to reduce GHG emissions and increase energy security, the hydrogen-production approach has several advantages, including up to five times higher carbon dioxide removal potential. However, the hydrogen bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (HyBECCS) approach also faces some challenges, such as higher capital costs, the need for additional infrastructure, and lower energy efficiency. Our results give valuable insights into the trade-offs between these two approaches. They can inform decision-makers regarding the most suitable method for reducing GHG emissions and provide renewable energy in different settings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Carbon Capture and Storage and Renewable Energy Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 12270 KiB  
Article
Bi-Functional Non-Superconducting Saturated-Core Inductor for Single-Stage Grid-Tied PV Systems: Filter and Fault Current Limiter
by Rania A. Ibrahim and Nahla E. Zakzouk
Energies 2023, 16(10), 4206; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16104206 - 19 May 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1030
Abstract
Single-stage grid-interfaced PV topologies have challenges with high grid fault currents, despite being more efficient, simpler to implement, and less expensive than two-stage ones. In such systems, a single inverter is required to perform all grid-interface tasks. i.e., maximum power point tracking (MPPT), [...] Read more.
Single-stage grid-interfaced PV topologies have challenges with high grid fault currents, despite being more efficient, simpler to implement, and less expensive than two-stage ones. In such systems, a single inverter is required to perform all grid-interface tasks. i.e., maximum power point tracking (MPPT), DC voltage stabilization, and grid current control. This necessitates a hardware-based fault current limitation solution rather than a software-based one to avoid adding to the inverter’s control complexity and to mitigate the implications of PV system tripping. Therefore, in this study, a dual-functional non-superconducting saturated-core inductor-based (SCI) reactor is proposed to be applied at the output of a single-stage PV inverter. It involves two operation modes: a grid pre-fault mode where it filters the line current, hence minimizing its THD, and a grid-fault mode where it acts as a fault current limiter (FCL). Controlling the DC saturation current flowing into its control winding terminals alters the core magnetization of the SCI to vary its impedance between a low value during normal utility operation and a maximal value during faults. Consequently, the system is protected against inverter failures or unnecessary circuit-breaker tripping, which preserves service continuity and reduces system losses. Moreover, compared to existing FCLs, the proposed topology is an appealing candidate in terms of cost, size, reliability, and harmonic filtering ability. The bi-functionality and usefulness of the proposed reactor are confirmed using simulation and experimental results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Carbon Capture and Storage and Renewable Energy Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

16 pages, 5736 KiB  
Review
Review on CO2–Brine Interaction in Oil and Gas Reservoirs
by Chanfei Wang, Songtao Wu, Yue Shen and Xiang Li
Energies 2024, 17(16), 3926; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17163926 - 8 Aug 2024
Viewed by 293
Abstract
Carbon neutrality has become a global common goal. CCUS, as one of the technologies to achieve carbon neutrality, has received widespread attention from academia and industry. After CO2 enters the formation, under the conditions of formation temperature and pressure, supercritical CO2 [...] Read more.
Carbon neutrality has become a global common goal. CCUS, as one of the technologies to achieve carbon neutrality, has received widespread attention from academia and industry. After CO2 enters the formation, under the conditions of formation temperature and pressure, supercritical CO2, formation water, and rock components interact, which directly affects the oil and gas recovery and carbon sequestration efficiency. In this paper, the recent progress on CO2 water–rock interaction was reviewed from three aspects, including (i) the investigation methods of CO2 water–rock interaction; (ii) the variable changes of key minerals, pore structure, and physical properties; and (iii) the nomination of suitable reservoirs for CO2 geological sequestration. The review obtains the following three understandings: (1) Physical simulation and cross-time scale numerical simulation based on formation temperature and pressure conditions are important research methods for CO2 water–rock interaction. High-precision mineral-pore in situ comparison and physical property evolution evaluation are important development directions. (2) Sensitive minerals in CO2 water–rock interaction mainly include dolomite, calcite, anhydrite, feldspar, kaolinite, and chlorite. Due to the differences in simulated formation conditions or geological backgrounds, these minerals generally show the pattern of dissolution or precipitation or dissolution before precipitation. This differential evolution leads to complex changes in pore structure and physical properties. (3) To select the suitable reservoir for sequestration, it is necessary to confirm the sequestration potential of the reservoir and the later sequestration capacity, and then select the appropriate layer and well location to start CO2 injection. At the same time, these processes can be optimized by CO2 water–rock interaction research. This review aims to provide scientific guidance and technical support for shale oil recovery and carbon sequestration by introducing the mechanism of CO2 water–rock interaction, expounding the changes of key minerals, pore structure, and physical properties, and summarizing the sequestration scheme. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Carbon Capture and Storage and Renewable Energy Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop