entropy-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Memory and Criticality

A special issue of Entropy (ISSN 1099-4300). This special issue belongs to the section "Complexity".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 May 2021) | Viewed by 15241

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Center for Nonlinear Science, University of North Texas, P.O. Box 311427, Denton, TX 76203-1427, USA
Interests: biophysics, nonlinear dynamics and complex systems; science of complexity; joint action of order and randomness as a source of long-range correlation; self-organization in physics, biology, and material science; from dynamics to thermodynamics and from quantum to classical physics: the anomalous versus the ordinary statistical mechanical perspective

E-Mail Website
Assistant Guest Editor
Center for Nonlinear Science, University of North Texas, P.O. Box 311427, Denton, TX 76203-1427, USA
Interests: complex systems

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The subject of paradoxes as generators of new kinds of knowledge, illustrated in the recent book [1] may afford suggestions to trigger a debate on conflicting views into a significant progress of knowledge. The use of the either-or way of thinking yields a stalemate and it is not the proper way to deal with complexity science.

We propose a Special Issue of the journal Entropy that should contribute to shedding light into the following debates:

(1) 1/f noise

How can we combine the assumption that the world is driven by quantum mechanics with the belief that it should fit the second principle of thermodynamics? Is the second principle a consequence of the limitation of human minds, which are forced to describe as random the processes that would require an unlimited computational power to take into account their deep connection with coherence and reversibility? Or, is the opposite condition true: that quantum mechanics is not the ultimate theory of the world, and a suitable generalization of it would disclose the action of genuine randomness? We do not mean to propose a philosophical debate on this specific question, but are only using it as metaphor to outline the complexity problems for this Special Issue of Entropy.

In the case of the dynamics of the brain, there exists a widely shared conviction that the brain works at criticality and that this condition is signaled by the healthy brain generating 1/f noise. However, the 1/f noise spectrum apparently representing a remarkable deviation from randomness has two distinct origins. The former, which is more popular, is compatible with coherence and ultimately with reversibility. It is based on the assumption that the fluctuations generated by complex systems can be properly described by stationary correlation function. These fluctuations are sources of deviation from normal diffusion due to the fact that their stationary correlation functions yield very slow (non-integrable in time) decays. There exists another form of 1/f noise triggered by renewal events with correlation functions that are not stationary. This form of 1/f noise is incompatible with the traditional ergodic assumptions, thereby raising the question of what is the most convenient form of entropic treatment to adopt and to what extent it differs from the entropic treatment to adopt for the former.

(2) Evolutionary Game Theory, Emergence of Cognition

The emergence of cooperation from the interaction of units that are expected to be driven by self-interest is another form of paradox requiring a new way of thinking. In fact, the advocates of the field of evolutionary game theory have been successfully addressing this issue as a result of simplification, such as neglecting social activity not directly involving the paradoxical conflict between cooperation and self-interest, leaving open the question of whether the birth of cooperation may be an emergent process of the same kind as cognition. The emergence of cognition is widely interpreted as a result of criticality, but also criticality is the subject of different interpretations. Some of these interpretations involve renewal crucial events, thereby bringing us back to the open issue of the origin of 1/f noise. Is it possible that the brain, and in general more complex systems, from the biological to the sociological level, may host both forms of 1/f noise?

(3) Bounded Rationality and Criticality

Recent psychological experiments have led to discovering that the human brain may lead to judgment departing from classical logic, thereby leading many researchers to propose the use of quantum probability to explain bounded rationality, in conflict with the view that moving from the microscopic to the macroscopic level where the brain is supposed to operate, quantum mechanics is expected to turn into classical mechanics. There are signs that criticality may explain bounded rationality without involving quantum mechanics. However, criticality of complex systems of small size may generate crucial events and with them a form of 1/f noise that is incompatible with coherence, mainly resting on the unpredictability of crucial events. Do ways exists to analyze real data, physiological and social data, so as to assess if both forms of complexity are in action, and if it is not case, which of them is the genuine source of complexity? What entropic formalism has to be adopted?

[1] B. J. West, K. Mahmoodi, P. Grigolini, Empirical Paradox, Complexity Thinking and Generating New Kinds of Knowledge, Cambridge Scholar Publishing (2019).

Prof. Dr. Paolo Grigolini
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Entropy is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

18 pages, 3403 KiB  
Article
Approaching Bounded Rationality: From Quantum Probability to Criticality
by Lucio Tonello and Paolo Grigolini
Entropy 2021, 23(6), 745; https://doi.org/10.3390/e23060745 - 13 Jun 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2521
Abstract
The bounded rationality mainstream is based on interesting experiments showing human behaviors violating classical probability (CP) laws. Quantum probability (QP) has been shown to successfully figure out such issues, supporting the hypothesis that quantum mechanics is the central fundamental pillar for brain function [...] Read more.
The bounded rationality mainstream is based on interesting experiments showing human behaviors violating classical probability (CP) laws. Quantum probability (QP) has been shown to successfully figure out such issues, supporting the hypothesis that quantum mechanics is the central fundamental pillar for brain function and cognition emergence. We discuss the decision-making model (DMM), a paradigmatic instance of criticality, which deals with bounded rationality issues in a similar way as QP, generating choices that cannot be accounted by CP. We define this approach as criticality-induced bounded rationality (CIBR). For some aspects, CIBR is even more satisfactory than QP. Our work may contribute to considering criticality as another possible fundamental pillar in order to improve the understanding of cognition and of quantum mechanics as well. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Memory and Criticality)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2743 KiB  
Article
Biophotons and Emergence of Quantum Coherence—A Diffusion Entropy Analysis
by Maurizio Benfatto, Elisabetta Pace, Catalina Curceanu, Alessandro Scordo, Alberto Clozza, Ivan Davoli, Massimiliano Lucci, Roberto Francini, Fabio De Matteis, Maurizio Grandi, Rohisha Tuladhar and Paolo Grigolini
Entropy 2021, 23(5), 554; https://doi.org/10.3390/e23050554 - 29 Apr 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 6940
Abstract
We study the emission of photons from germinating seeds using an experimental technique designed to detect light of extremely small intensity. We analyze the dark count signal without germinating seeds as well as the photon emission during the germination process. The technique of [...] Read more.
We study the emission of photons from germinating seeds using an experimental technique designed to detect light of extremely small intensity. We analyze the dark count signal without germinating seeds as well as the photon emission during the germination process. The technique of analysis adopted here, called diffusion entropy analysis (DEA) and originally designed to measure the temporal complexity of astrophysical, sociological and physiological processes, rests on Kolmogorov complexity. The updated version of DEA used in this paper is designed to determine if the signal complexity is generated either by non-ergodic crucial events with a non-stationary correlation function or by the infinite memory of a stationary but non-integrable correlation function or by a mixture of both processes. We find that dark count yields the ordinary scaling, thereby showing that no complexity of either kinds may occur without any seeds in the chamber. In the presence of seeds in the chamber anomalous scaling emerges, reminiscent of that found in neuro-physiological processes. However, this is a mixture of both processes and with the progress of germination the non-ergodic component tends to vanish and complexity becomes dominated by the stationary infinite memory. We illustrate some conjectures ranging from stress induced annihilation of crucial events to the emergence of quantum coherence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Memory and Criticality)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1276 KiB  
Article
Caputo Fractional Derivative and Quantum-Like Coherence
by Garland Culbreth, Mauro Bologna, Bruce J. West and Paolo Grigolini
Entropy 2021, 23(2), 211; https://doi.org/10.3390/e23020211 - 9 Feb 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2344
Abstract
We study two forms of anomalous diffusion, one equivalent to replacing the ordinary time derivative of the standard diffusion equation with the Caputo fractional derivative, and the other equivalent to replacing the time independent diffusion coefficient of the standard diffusion equation with a [...] Read more.
We study two forms of anomalous diffusion, one equivalent to replacing the ordinary time derivative of the standard diffusion equation with the Caputo fractional derivative, and the other equivalent to replacing the time independent diffusion coefficient of the standard diffusion equation with a monotonic time dependence. We discuss the joint use of these prescriptions, with a phenomenological method and a theoretical projection method, leading to two apparently different diffusion equations. We prove that the two diffusion equations are equivalent and design a time series that corresponds to the anomalous diffusion equation proposed. We discuss these results in the framework of the growing interest in fractional derivatives and the emergence of cognition in nature. We conclude that the Caputo fractional derivative is a signature of the connection between cognition and self-organization, a form of cognition emergence different from the other source of anomalous diffusion, which is closely related to quantum coherence. We propose a criterion to detect the action of self-organization even in the presence of significant quantum coherence. We argue that statistical analysis of data using diffusion entropy should help the analysis of physiological processes hosting both forms of deviation from ordinary scaling. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Memory and Criticality)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

14 pages, 945 KiB  
Review
Crucial Development: Criticality Is Important to Cell-to-Cell Communication and Information Transfer in Living Systems
by Ione Hunt von Herbing, Lucio Tonello, Maurizio Benfatto, April Pease and Paolo Grigolini
Entropy 2021, 23(9), 1141; https://doi.org/10.3390/e23091141 - 31 Aug 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2540
Abstract
In the fourth paper of this Special Issue, we bridge the theoretical debate on the role of memory and criticality discussed in the three earlier manuscripts, with a review of key concepts in biology and focus on cell-to-cell communication in organismal development. While [...] Read more.
In the fourth paper of this Special Issue, we bridge the theoretical debate on the role of memory and criticality discussed in the three earlier manuscripts, with a review of key concepts in biology and focus on cell-to-cell communication in organismal development. While all living organisms are dynamic complex networks of organization and disorder, most studies in biology have used energy and biochemical exchange to explain cell differentiation without considering the importance of information (entropy) transfer. While all complex networks are mixtures of patterns of complexity (non-crucial and crucial events), it is the crucial events that determine the efficiency of information transfer, especially during key transitions, such as in embryogenesis. With increasing multicellularity, emergent relationships from cell-to-cell communication create reaction–diffusion exchanges of different concentrations of biochemicals or morphogenetic gradients resulting in differential gene expression. We suggest that in conjunction with morphogenetic gradients, there exist gradients of information transfer creating cybernetic loops of stability and disorder, setting the stage for adaptive capability. We specifically reference results from the second paper in this Special Issue, which correlated biophotons with lentil seed germination to show that phase transitions accompany changes in complexity patterns during development. Criticality, therefore, appears to be an important factor in the transmission, transfer and coding of information for complex adaptive system development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Memory and Criticality)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop