Sustainable Forest Management, Agroforestry Competencies and Regenerative Agriculture for Attaining 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

A special issue of Forests (ISSN 1999-4907). This special issue belongs to the section "Forest Economics, Policy, and Social Science".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 October 2023) | Viewed by 3475

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton 76201, TX, USA
Interests: plant pathology; molecular biology; crop improvement; qRT-PCR; protein-protein interaction

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Economics and Management, Northwest Agricultural and Forestry University, Yangling 712100, China
Interests: agricultural economic management and industrial economy

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Economy and Finance, Voronezh State University of Forestry and Technologies, 394036 Voronezh, Russia
Interests: ecological; forestry economic management; economic efficiency

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Contradicting forces are shaping the sustainability of global forests, which are deeply impacted by global challenges such as climate change, poverty and hunger, uncontrolled demography, and urbanization, and must cope with new threats to health and the global economy. Beyond geopolitical challenges, ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, biomass for materials and energy production, and increasing demand for land are key questions. By generating new activities in response to ever-changing challenges, such forces can improve the capacity of societies to adapt. However, they can also reduce that capacity by creating new threats to forestry sustainability.

Thus, to avail such potentiality, the notion of sustainable forest management, agroforestry, and regenerative agriculture has evolved.

  • Sustainable forest management offers a holistic approach to ensure forest activities deliver social, environmental, and economic benefits, balance competing needs, and maintain and enhance forest functions now and in the future.
  • Agroforestry is the integration of trees and shrubs into farming landscapes, enabling farmers to improve their land's environmental, social, and economic values.
  • Regenerative agriculture is a holistic approach to land management that keeps water in the landscape, improves soil health, stores carbon, and increases biodiversity.

These three district tactics may contribute to food security, increase biodiversity, and combat climate change and may attract more policy attention and investment to fulfill their potential for achieving the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, these trends have recently received significant attention from producers, retailers, researchers, consumers, politicians, international development organizations, and the mainstream media.

These insights will assist readers in understanding how the notion of sustainable forest management, agroforestry, and regenerative agriculture practices can foster SDGs set by the UN. In this context, research and reflections developed in different territorial contexts are welcome.

Potential topics include, but are not limited to:

  • How the six Ps (People, Planet, Prosperity, Peace, and Partnership) impact sustainable forest management.
  • The impacts of including indigenous people and their tactics to sustainably manage existing forests.
  • The conservation and maintenance of soil and water resources in forest areas.
  • The maintenance and enhancement of long-term multiple socioeconomic benefits to meet the needs of societies.
  • Legal, institutional, and economic framework for forest conservation and sustainable management.
  • Agroforestry policies at different levels of decision making.
  • The nexus between agroforestry and regenerative agriculture.
  • Social, economic, and environmental prospects of agroforestry and regenerative agriculture.
  • Extending the prospects of sustainable forest management, agroforestry, and regenerative agriculture: (i) adaptation, resilience, and mitigation of climate change; (iii) integrated soil, water, and biodiversity management; (iii) improved productivity and livelihoods; (iv) soil armor, diversity, continual live plant/root, livestock integration, and minimizing soil disturbance.

Dr. Md Ashraful Islam
Prof. Dr. Qian Lu
Prof. Tatiana L. Bezrukova
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Forests is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

 

Keywords

  • sustainable forest
  • management
  • agroforestry
  • modelling
  • lifecycle assessment
  • regenerative agriculture
  • sustainable development goals
  • soil, water, and biodiversity conservation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 3117 KiB  
Article
Functionality of Zonal Agroforestry Systems on Agricultural Land of Dry Territories
by Anna Michailovna Pugacheva
Forests 2023, 14(12), 2364; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14122364 - 1 Dec 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1212
Abstract
In this study, agroforestry systems (AFSs) are represented by zonal type using the example of agricultural lands of the administrative districts of the Volgograd region for the first time. The average percentage of forest cover in the territories for these categories of land [...] Read more.
In this study, agroforestry systems (AFSs) are represented by zonal type using the example of agricultural lands of the administrative districts of the Volgograd region for the first time. The average percentage of forest cover in the territories for these categories of land was 0.9%, with the following distribution by zone: real steppe—1.3%; dry steppe—0.97%; and semidesert—0.6%. Cartographic analysis of the spatial distribution of areas of artificial forest plantations, presented in the form of background cartograms, showed the greatest spatial asymmetry and variability in the forest cover index in the semidesert zone (As = 1.68; Ex = −4.08). This is due to the large variation in indicators by occupied space, namely AFS, agricultural land, and arable land. The calculated area of arable land under AFS protection averaged 35% for the region, with the following distribution by zone: real steppe—47% of the area of the zone; dry steppe—22%; and semidesert—82%. The author’s methodological approach presents the exposed AFS area of arable land as open and closed territories. The open territory of the spring period (March) is land at risk of deflation since it is completely free of plants (black fallows, areas covered by spring crops, and tilled crops). It makes up 67% of the exposed area of AFSs. The annual removal of soil from this area of the region was calculated via mathematical analysis. It amounted to 3.08 × 107 tons. Analysis of the AFS species composition showed the following distribution of species: deciduous species—86%; mixed species—8%; and coniferous—6%. This model can be applied to many arid areas to calculate deflationary losses and the amount of additional AFSs needed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2566 KiB  
Article
Ecological Awareness, Policy Perception, and Green Production Behaviors of Farmers Living in or near Protected Areas
by Shuo Lei, Qin Qiao, Xinting Gao, Ji Feng, Yali Wen and Yongwei Han
Forests 2023, 14(7), 1339; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071339 - 29 Jun 2023
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 1848
Abstract
Research highlights: Ecological policies must balance ecosystem protection by promoting the sustainable livelihoods of farmers living in or near protected areas; however, the intrinsic motivations of farmers to adopt green production behaviors (GPBs) are poorly understood. Background and objectives: We explored how ecological [...] Read more.
Research highlights: Ecological policies must balance ecosystem protection by promoting the sustainable livelihoods of farmers living in or near protected areas; however, the intrinsic motivations of farmers to adopt green production behaviors (GPBs) are poorly understood. Background and objectives: We explored how ecological policies affect the GPBs of farmers in agroforestry. Materials and methods: We conducted questionnaires of farmers in 11 counties of Sichuan Province, China, with abundant protected areas and large-scale agroforestry, after which a structural equation model of farmers’ ecological awareness, policy perception, and GPBs was constructed. Results: (1) Ecological policies can stimulate farmers’ GPBs by improving their ecological awareness, creating positive subjective norms, and inducing the “herd effect”. Increases in protection intensity and scope amplify the pressures on farmers to maintain more than long-term policy consistency. (2) Green production is more time-consuming, laborious, expensive, and difficult to learn compared with traditional production methods, which have somewhat limited GPBs adoption. (3) In the rural “acquaintance society”, information and communication from others have a substantial impact on farmers’ perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors; thus, positive subjective norms from formal and informal channels could promote GPB adoption. Conclusions: Future policies should prioritize environmental education over environmental publicity by helping farmers understand the long-term relationship between ecological protection and economic development, teaching individual environmental responsibility, enhancing positive feedback to farmers who adopt GPBs, actively exploring mechanisms for realizing the value of ecological products, and improving farmers’ management skills and learning ability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop