ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Progress in the Development of Hearing Protection

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Health Behavior, Chronic Disease and Health Promotion".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 April 2022) | Viewed by 4212

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of psycholoy, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
Interests: noise; measurement and assessment; hearing; hearing loss; hearing conservation; hearing protection; standards; teaching

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Hearing protectors have been around for a very long time in one shape or other. In his epic poem Odyssey (8-7 BC), Homer mentions that Odysseus had his sailors’ ears plugged up with beeswax to avoid listening to the Sirens. Wax plugs, however, have only been in use since the early 1960s, with new products flooding the market following the end of WW2, and it is only in the last 20–30 years that we have seen real progress in the field. This is most evident through the appearance of protectors intended to solve specific problems, such as protection from impulse noise, intelligibility of speech in noise, forward masking from low frequency noise, etc.

Progress has been also made in collateral fields, such as standardization, testing, and labeling. One would think that by now, there are no more problems regarding hearing protectors and that, in consequence, everyone in need of protection will wear them.

We all know, however, that this is not the case. Time and again, researchers find that people either do not use protectors or do not use them properly. There are many reasons behind this, but comfort appears to be the predominant issue. Strange as it may sound, we still do not have a clear-cut definition of comfort—we still do not know how to measure it, and we are a long way from having a standard on comfort.

This is perhaps the main issue that needs to be solved first, rather than focusing on achieving extra dB of attenuation which will be of little usefulness if the devices that offer this are not worn.

We invite you to submit to this Special Issue papers that help to fill that important gap in our knowledge.

Prof. Dr. Alberto Behar
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • noise
  • hearing
  • hearing loss
  • hearing protectors: history
  • problems with HP
  • hearing protectors and comfort
  • acceptance of hearing protectors
  • conventional hearing protectors
  • specialized hearing protectors
  • speech intelligibility
  • perception of alarm signal
  • testing of hearing protectors
  • labeling of hearing protectors
  • standards for HPs

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research

2 pages, 412 KiB  
Editorial
Best Hearing Protectors Ever?
by Alberto Behar
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(4), 2165; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042165 - 15 Feb 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1325
Abstract
The best protectors are those that are worn (Aram Glorig) [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress in the Development of Hearing Protection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Research

Jump to: Editorial

20 pages, 2243 KiB  
Article
Towards a Holistic Model Explaining Hearing Protection Device Use among Workers
by Olivier Doutres, Jonathan Terroir, Caroline Jolly, Chantal Gauvin, Laurence Martin and Alessia Negrini
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(9), 5578; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095578 - 4 May 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2380
Abstract
Offering hearing protection devices (HPDs) to workers exposed to hazardous noise is a noise control strategy often used to prevent noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). However, HPDs are used incorrectly and inconsistently, which explains their limited efficiency. Numerous models based on social cognition theories [...] Read more.
Offering hearing protection devices (HPDs) to workers exposed to hazardous noise is a noise control strategy often used to prevent noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). However, HPDs are used incorrectly and inconsistently, which explains their limited efficiency. Numerous models based on social cognition theories identify the significant factors associated with inconsistent HPD use and aim to improve HPD training programs and to increase HPD use. However, these models do not detail (dis)comfort aspects originating from complex interactions between characteristics of the triad “environment/person/HPD” while these aspects are known to largely influence HPD (mis)use. This paper proposes a holistic model explaining HPD (mis)use, based on the integration of a comfort model adapted to HPDs into an existing behavioral model already developed for HPDs. The model also takes into account the temporal dimension, which makes it possible to capture the scope of change in HPD-related health behaviors. This holistic description of HPD use could be used as a tool for stakeholders involved in HPD use to effectively prevent NIHL among workers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress in the Development of Hearing Protection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop