ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Innovative Technologies for Functional Evaluation of Posture and Movement in Rehabilitation, Sports and Ageing

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 September 2023) | Viewed by 5181

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Skeleton Movement Analysis and Advanced Rehabilitation Technologies (SMART) LAB, Bioengineering and Biomedicine Company Srl, 66020 Chieti, CH, Italy
2. Scuola Superiore Università G. D'Annunzio, Università G. D'Annunzio Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, CH, Italy
Interests: posture; biomechanics; gait analysis; motion capture; motion analysis; biomedical engineering; bioengineering; signal processing; image processing; baropodometry; stereophotogrammetry; posturography; electromyography; scoliosis and spinal disorders; musculoskeletal disorders; rehabilitation; sport biomechanics; neurologic disorders; ageing; diabetic foot; orthotics

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Chair of Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Department of Rehabilitation, University of Medical Sciences, 61701 Poznań, Poland
Interests: physiotherapy; spinal biomechanics; musculoskeletal dsorders; posture; rehabilitation; postural balance; ageing; physical rehabilitation; clinical examination; quality of Life

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Over the last twenty years, biomechanics has been progressively moving from research laboratories to routine clinical practice and the sports field. This transfer is mainly due to the awareness that it is necessary to carry out quantitative tests of function to understand human posture and movement, their optimisation for sports performance or the failures produced by pathology or ageing.

Therefore, quantitative functional assessment represents one of the main objectives to be achieved and, at the same time, one of the most challenging issues to be addressed for healthcare professionals, sports medicine biomechanists, and researchers.

Significant advances in motion capture equipment, research methodologies, and data analysis techniques have enabled a plethora of studies that have advanced our understanding of posture and movement biomechanics, proprioception and neuromotor control. However, despite these advances, much of the biomechanical research has investigated the influence of potential injury risk factors in isolation. More likely, multiple biomechanical and clinical variables interact and operate as combined risk factors.

Research in biomechanics is moving in two main directions.

On the one hand, to capture the complexity of these relationships, it is necessary to integrate many devices working together to obtain a multifactorial approach (i.e., considering multiple factors and their interaction) using sophisticated, increasing complex human body biomechanical models producing a holistic view of the functional expression of posture and movement.

In this perspective, a quantitative functional assessment of posture and movement analysis of the entire skeleton, including the spine, is highly desirable to assess the functional relationships between the lower and upper limbs, the spine, and the pelvis. The recent literature shows how the multifactorial approach is helping to demonstrate that spine disorders (e.g., low back pain, adult spinal deformities) and lower limb joint degeneration can be connected with load asymmetries or pelvis problems associated to leg length discrepancy, flat or arched foot or some functional impairments in the lower limbs. In the same way, the use of body kinematics associated with baropodometry aids the development of new strategies to contrast the risk factors for neuropathic diabetic foot ulceration.

On the other hand, recent advances in wearable sensing technologies and artificial intelligence (AI imaging, signal and data processing), with simplified biomechanical models, have opened up new exciting and extremely wide possibilities for the continuous monitoring of human kinematics and kinetics in free-living situations. Examples of such applications include but are not limited to analysing daily life activities, monitoring the therapeutic process, the timely detection and diagnosis of movement disorders, the evaluation of sports performance, the measurement of training activity and the associated risk of excessive physical stress and injuries affecting the musculoskeletal system, contrast through gamified exercise (exergames) of sarcopenia, osteopenia, risk of fall, and the reduction of motor function due to the ageing process.

This Special Issue aims to present recent research findings on the development and application of sensor technologies in measurements of human biomechanical and physiological parameters. In particular, the Special Issue will report on various sensors, such as video recording sensors, IMUs (inertial measurement units), plantar pressure sensors, and electromyographs. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts for publication which address topics including (but not limited to) the following:

  • Measuring the biomechanics of either the whole body or individual parts of the body.
  • Studies on spinal function and motion, muscle activation and/or spinal loading resulting from various spinal disorders including (but not limited to) specific or non-specific back pain, spinal deformities (e.g., scoliosis), and degenerative spinal disorders. 
  • Identifying biomechanical risk factors for the prediction of spinal disorders, as well as biomechanical factors related to disease progression.
  • Biomechanical and functional effects of current conservative and surgical treatment interventions.
  • Relationship between biomechanical factors and clinical outcomes.
  • Implementation of biomechanical assessments into clinical practice using, for example, wearable sensors or AI-based video analysis.
  • Biomechanical sensors in disease assessment, functional diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation.
  • Baropodometry and plantar pressure analysis.
  • Biomechanical sensors for assisted living monitoring.
  • Biomechanical sensors in gait analysis.
  • Biomechanical sensors in sports.
  • Novel applications of the continuous monitoring of human motion in rehabilitation.
  • Surface electromyography.
  • IMUs for human motion tracking.
  • Force sensors (strain gauge, piezo, etc.).
  • Optical tracking systems.
  • Challenges in data processing, simulation, and validation.
  • Challenges in data sensor fusion.
  • Technical challenges in assuring the accuracy and robustness of the provided measures (i.e., sensor placement, measurement drift, repeatability of the provided measures).
  • Wireless sensors for human motion tracking.

Dr. Moreno D'Amico
Dr. Edyta Kinel
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • biomechanics
  • posture
  • gait analysis
  • stereo-photogrammetry
  • spine
  • spinal disorders
  • low back pain, surface electromyography
  • baropodometry
  • plantar pressure analysis
  • wearable sensors
  • markerless movement analysis
  • AI-based video analysis

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

27 pages, 3250 KiB  
Article
SANE (Easy Gait Analysis System): Towards an AI-Assisted Automatic Gait-Analysis
by Dario Sipari, Betsy D. M. Chaparro-Rico and Daniele Cafolla
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(16), 10032; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610032 - 14 Aug 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2933
Abstract
The gait cycle of humans may be influenced by a range of variables, including neurological, orthopedic, and pathological conditions. Thus, gait analysis has a broad variety of applications, including the diagnosis of neurological disorders, the study of disease development, the assessment of the [...] Read more.
The gait cycle of humans may be influenced by a range of variables, including neurological, orthopedic, and pathological conditions. Thus, gait analysis has a broad variety of applications, including the diagnosis of neurological disorders, the study of disease development, the assessment of the efficacy of a treatment, postural correction, and the evaluation and enhancement of sport performances. While the introduction of new technologies has resulted in substantial advancements, these systems continue to struggle to achieve a right balance between cost, analytical accuracy, speed, and convenience. The target is to provide low-cost support to those with motor impairments in order to improve their quality of life. The article provides a novel automated approach for motion characterization that makes use of artificial intelligence to perform real-time analysis, complete automation, and non-invasive, markerless analysis. This automated procedure enables rapid diagnosis and prevents human mistakes. The gait metrics obtained by the two motion tracking systems were compared to show the effectiveness of the proposed methodology. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 35937 KiB  
Article
Movement Analysis Could Help in the Assessment of Chronic Low Back Pain Patients: Results from a Preliminary Explorative Study
by Stefano Negrini, Joel Pollet, Giorgia Ranica, Sabrina Donzelli, Massimiliano Vanossi, Barbara Piovanelli, Cinzia Amici and Riccardo Buraschi
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(15), 9033; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159033 - 25 Jul 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1576
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to assess the reliability of a qualitative scoring system based on the movement analysis of the spine in different populations and after usual care rehabilitative intervention. If proven true, the results could further future research development in quantitative [...] Read more.
Introduction: This study aimed to assess the reliability of a qualitative scoring system based on the movement analysis of the spine in different populations and after usual care rehabilitative intervention. If proven true, the results could further future research development in quantitative indexes, leading to a possible subclassification of chronic low back pain (cLBP). Methods: This was a preliminary exploratory observational study. Data of an optoelectronic spine movement analysis from a pathological population (cLBP population, 5 male, 5 female, age 58 ± 16 years) were compared to young healthy participants (5M, 5F, age 22 ± 1) and were analysed via a new qualitative score of the pattern of movement. Internal consistency was calculated. Two independent assessors (experienced and inexperienced) assessed the blinded data, and we calculated inter- and intrarater reliability. We performed an analysis for cLBP pre and post a ten session group rehabilitation program between and within groups. Results: Internal consistency was good for all movements (α = 0.84–0.88). Intra-rater reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient–ICC) was excellent for overall scores of all movements (ICC(1,k) = 0.95–0.99), while inter-rater reliability was poor to moderate (ICC(1,k) = 0.39–0.78). We found a significant difference in the total movement scores between cLBP and healthy participants (p = 0.001). Within-group comparison (cLBP) showed no significant difference in the total movement score in pre and post-treatment. Conclusion: The perception of differences between normal and pathological movements has been confirmed through the proposed scoring system, which proved to be able to distinguish different populations. This study has many limitations, but these results show that movement analysis could be a useful tool and open the door to quantifying the identified parameters through future studies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop