Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery: Management and Future Opportunities

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 May 2024) | Viewed by 2385

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Visceral and Abdominal Surgery, Sana Klinikum Hof GmbH, Eppenreuther Str. 9, 95032 Hof, Bavaria, Germany
Interests: pancreatitis; HPB surgery; liver cancer; pancreatic cancer

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery is probably the most versatile and demanding surgery in upper GI procedures. Although survival has improved dramatically in the past decade, complication rates remain at rather high levels. The introduction of minimally invasive surgery in pancreatic surgery, mainly triggered by improvements in robotic surgery, has demonstrated its feasibility but failed to decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula, bile leakage, and vascular complication rates. Nonetheless, surgical techniques have consistently improved, resulting in increased survival in pancreatic cancer patients and emergency Whipple procedures.

The improvement in outcomes in HPB patients, despite the improvements in surgery, is mainly driven by the development of interventional techniques in gastroenterology and radiology. When comparing low- to high-volume institutions, it becomes quite clear that the differences in mortality rates are mainly triggered by a failure to rescue rather than by fewer complications in high-volume centers.

It becomes obvious that HPB surgery should only be carried out in institutions that provide 24/7 access to experienced interventional radiologists and gastroenterologists in order to treat HPB complications such as bile leakages, pseudoaneurysm, fluid collection from bile, or pancreatic fistulas.

From a surgical point of view, there are high expectations regarding the future development of robotic-assisted surgery in HPB procedures. Improvements in surgical techniques and further developments in engineering will lead to more sophisticated instruments and devices for this innovative type of surgery.

Especially for cancer patients, the latest developments in molecular targeted therapies and transarterial approaches for organ-specific perfusion/occlusion techniques will further improve survival in patients suffering from these rather aggressive tumors, such as HCC, CCC, and pancreatic adeno-carcinoma.

This Special Issue of the Journal of Clinical Medicine aims to attract original research articles and reviews on the latest aspects of HPB surgery, especially in terms of clinical experiences, improvements for HPB cancer patients, and innovative treatment options in order to reduce or treat perioperative complications to improve long-term survival.

Prof. Dr. Christian Graeb
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • HPB surgery
  • liver cancer
  • pancreatic cancer
  • minimally invasive surgery
  • robotic-assisted surgery
  • targeted therapy
  • interventional radiology
  • interventional gastroenterology
  • complications management in HPB surgery

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

14 pages, 1795 KiB  
Article
Surgical Outcome and Microbial Colonization of Standardized Smear Locations after Pancreatic Head Resection (Pylorus-Preserving Pancreatoduodenectomy, PPPD) for Chronic Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Head Carcinoma
by Max Grabowski, Ronny Otto, Ina Tammer, Dörthe Jechorek, Henry Ptok, Sara Al-Madhi, Roland Croner and Frank Meyer
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(13), 3810; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133810 - 28 Jun 2024
Viewed by 553
Abstract
Introduction: Patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) as well as with pancreatic head carcinoma (CA) undergo the surgical intervention named “pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy according to Traverso–Longmire (PPPD)”, which allowed a comparative analysis of the postoperative courses. The hypothesis was that patients with CA would have [...] Read more.
Introduction: Patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) as well as with pancreatic head carcinoma (CA) undergo the surgical intervention named “pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy according to Traverso–Longmire (PPPD)”, which allowed a comparative analysis of the postoperative courses. The hypothesis was that patients with CA would have worse general as well as immune status than patients with CP due to the severity of the tumor disease and that this would be reflected in the more disadvantageous early postoperative outcome after PPPD. Methods: With the aim of eliciting the influence of the different diagnoses, the surgical outcome of all consecutive patients who underwent surgery at the Dept. of General, Abdominal, Vascular and Transplant Surgery at the University Hospital at Magdeburg between 2002 and 2015 (inclusion criterion) was recorded and comparatively evaluated. Early postoperative outcome was characterized by general and specific complication rate indicating morbidity, mortality, and microbial colonization rate, in particular surgical site infection (SSI, according to CDC criteria). In addition, microbiological findings of swabs and cultures from all compartments as well as preoperative and perioperative parameters from patient records were retrospectively documented and used for statistical comparison in this systematic retrospective unicenter observational study (design). Results: In total, 192 cases with CA (68.1%) and 90 cases with CP (31.9%) met the inclusion criteria of this study. Surprisingly, there were similar specific complication rates of 45.3% (CA) vs. 45.6% (CP; p = 0.97) and in-hospital mortality, which differed only slightly at 3.65% (CA) vs. 3.3% (CP; p = 0.591); the overall complication rate tended to be higher for CA at 23.4% vs. 14.4% (CP; p = 0.082). Overall, potentially pathogenic germs were detected in 28.9% of all patients in CP compared to 32.8% in CA (p = 0.509), and the rate of SSI was 29.7% (CA) and 24.4% (CP; p = 0.361). In multivariate analysis, CA was found to be a significant risk factor for the development of SSI (OR: 2.025; p = 0.048); the underlying disease had otherwise no significant effect on early postoperative outcome. Significant risk factors in the multivariate analysis were also male sex for SSI and microbial colonization, and intraoperatively transfused red cell packs for mortality, general and specific complications, and surgical revisions. Conclusions: Based on these results, a partly significant, partly trending negative influence of the underlying disease CA, compared to CP, on the early postoperative outcome was found, especially with regard to SSI after PPPD. This influence is corroborated by the international literature. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 991 KiB  
Article
The Pancreas as a Target of Metastasis from Renal Cell Carcinoma: Is Surgery Feasible and Safe? A Single-Center Experience in a High-Volume and Certified Pancreatic Surgery Center in Germany
by Sara Al-Madhi, Sara Acciuffi, Frank Meyer, Maximilian Dölling, Asmus Beythien, Mihailo Andric, Mirhasan Rahimli, Roland S. Croner and Aristotelis Perrakis
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(7), 1921; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13071921 - 26 Mar 2024
Viewed by 606
Abstract
Background: Secondary malignant tumors of the pancreas are rare, representing 2–5% of all pancreatic malignancies. Nevertheless, the pancreas is one of the target organs in cases of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC). Additionally, recurrent metastasis may occur. Surgical resection remains [...] Read more.
Background: Secondary malignant tumors of the pancreas are rare, representing 2–5% of all pancreatic malignancies. Nevertheless, the pancreas is one of the target organs in cases of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC). Additionally, recurrent metastasis may occur. Surgical resection remains the best and prognostically most favorable therapeutic option in cases of solitary pancreatic metastasis. Aim: To review retrospectively the clinical tumor registry of the University Hospital of Magdeburg, Germany, for this rare entity, performing a clinical systematic single-center observational study (design). Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive patients who had undergone pancreatic resection for metastatic CCRC was performed in a single high-volume certified center for pancreatic surgery in Germany from 2010 to 2022. Results: All patients (n = 17) included in this study had a metachronous metastasis from a CCRCC. Surgery was performed at a median time interval of 12 (range, 9–16) years after primary resection for CCRCC. All 17 patients were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. Three of those patients (17.6%) presented with recurrent metastasis in a different part of the pancreas during follow-up. In a total of 17 patients, including those with recurrent disease, a surgical resection was performed; Pancreatoduodenectomy was performed in 6 patients (35%); left pancreatectomy with splenectomy was performed in 7 patients (41%). The rest of the patients underwent either a spleen-preserving pancreatic tail resection, local resection of the tumor lesion or a total pancreatectomy. The postoperative mortality rate was 6%. Concerning histopathological findings, seven patients (41%) had multifocal metastasis. An R0 resection could be achieved in all cases. The overall survival at one, three and five years was 85%, 85% and 72%, respectively, during a median follow-up of 43 months. Conclusions: CCRC pancreatic metastases can occur many years after the initial treatment of the primary tumor. Surgery for such a malignancy seems feasible and safe; it offers very good short- and long-term outcomes, as indicated. A repeated pancreatic resection can also be safely performed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

10 pages, 1048 KiB  
Review
Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome (MALS) in Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery: A Narrative Review and Proposed Management Algorithm
by Lawrence Y. Lu, Jacques G. Eastment and Yogeesan Sivakumaran
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(9), 2598; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092598 - 28 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 875
Abstract
Median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is an uncommon condition characterized by the compression of the celiac trunk by the median arcuate ligament. Due to the anatomical proximity to the foregut, MALS has significant implications in hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery. It can pose complications in [...] Read more.
Median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is an uncommon condition characterized by the compression of the celiac trunk by the median arcuate ligament. Due to the anatomical proximity to the foregut, MALS has significant implications in hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery. It can pose complications in pancreatoduodenectomy and orthotopic liver transplantation, where the collateral arterial supply from the superior mesenteric artery is often disrupted. The estimated prevalence of MALS in HPB surgery is approximately 10%. Overall, there is consensus for a cautious approach to MALS when embarking on complex foregut surgery, with a low threshold for intraoperative median arcuate ligament release or hepatic artery reconstruction. The role of endovascular intervention in the management of MALS prior to HPB surgery continues to evolve, but more evidence is required to establish its efficacy. Recognizing the existing literature gap concerning optimal management in this population, we describe our tertiary center experience as a clinical algorithm to facilitate decision-making. Research question: What is the significance and management of median arcuate ligament syndrome in patients undergoing hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery? Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop