Obesity Surgery: Focus on Sleeve Gastrectomy, Mini-Gastric Bypass, and Gastric Bypass Surgeries

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Endocrinology & Metabolism".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 March 2024) | Viewed by 469

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
Interests: laparoscopic surgery; abdominal surgery; surgical anatomy

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
Interests: minimally invasive surgery; abdominal surgery; laparoscopic surgery; general surgery; colorectal surgery; gastrointestinal surgery; surgical oncology

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Obesity is classified as one of the most severe global public health problems. Over 2.1 billion adults worldwide are considered overweight or obese; 640 millions of these are classified as obese. Bariatric surgery has proven to be an effective treatment strategy in treating obesity and improving associated comorbidities. At present, the most commonly conducted bariatric surgical procedures are Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and mini-gastric bypass (MGB).

Consensual indications for bariatric surgery are BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2, BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 with T2D or other comorbidities that could be significantly improved after bariatric surgery.

Bleeding, leakage and gastric fistulae are the most common intraoperative complications and post-operative complications following bariatric procedures.

Literature reports a wide range of post-bariatric surgery complications, with a frequency ranging from 1% to 29%. Most common post-operative complications reported include leakage, haemorrhage, fistula, surgical site infection, abscess, gastric dilatation, stricture, wound complication and nutritional deficiencies.

The aim of this Special Issue is to compare the techniques most used in bariatric surgery, to observe how the complication and morbidity rate for each procedure changes.

Dr. Giovanna Pavone
Dr. Nicola Tartaglia
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sleeve gastrectomy
  • mini-gastric bypass
  • Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
  • obesity
  • bariatric surgery
  • complications after bariatric surgery

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

10 pages, 975 KiB  
Article
Diabetes Is Associated with Worse Postoperative Mortality and Morbidity in Bariatric Surgery, Regardless of the Procedure
by Omar Khalil, Soha Dargham, Amin Jayyousi, Jassim Al Suwaidi and Charbel Abi Khalil
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(11), 3174; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113174 - 28 May 2024
Viewed by 289
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Bariatric surgery is a central cornerstone in obesity treatment. We aimed to assess the impact of diabetes on the postoperative outcomes of bariatric surgery and compare three techniques: sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y, and gastric banding. Methods: We extracted data from the [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Bariatric surgery is a central cornerstone in obesity treatment. We aimed to assess the impact of diabetes on the postoperative outcomes of bariatric surgery and compare three techniques: sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y, and gastric banding. Methods: We extracted data from the National Inpatient Sample (2015–2019) using ICD codes. The primary outcome was postoperative mortality. Secondary outcomes were major bleeding, atrial fibrillation, and acute renal failure. Results: Among patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy, diabetes was associated with a higher adjusted risk of mortality (aOR 2.07 [1.36–3.16]), atrial fibrillation, and acute renal failure, but a similar risk of bleeding. Among patients who underwent Roux-en-Y, diabetes did not increase mortality and bleeding risk. Still, it was associated with a higher risk of atrial fibrillation and acute renal failure. Among patients who underwent gastric banding, diabetes was only associated with a higher risk of bleeding. When comparing the three techniques in diabetes patients, Roux-en-Y was significantly associated with higher mortality and acute renal failure risk when compared to the other procedures. Bleeding was more common in Roux-en-Y than in Sleeve. Conclusions: In total, diabetes is associated with worse postoperative outcomes in bariatric surgery, regardless of the technique. Among diabetes patients, Roux-en-Y was associated with the highest mortality and morbidity. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop