Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Diagnosis and Treatment

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Hematology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2021) | Viewed by 10964

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences at the University of Turin, Turin, Italy
Interests: chronic myeloid leukemia; Ph positive leukemias; molecular monitoring; digital PCR; treatment-free remission; biological markers; new drugs; myeloproliferative neoplasms

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Because the main causative genetic alteration of Ph+ Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) has been identified, and researchers have been able to develop tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) effective on BCR-ABL1, the prognosis of this disease has improved dramatically. Life expectancy of CML patients now approaches that of the general population. The advances we have seen in the last two decades have also been due to the introduction of standardized molecular monitoring of the BCR-ABL1 trancript, based on the quantitative PCR technique. In fact, today, molecular monitoring plays an essential role in the management of CML patients, leading the majority of clinical decisions.

This continuous improvement has led to increasingly challanging treatment goals. The possibility of leaving without treatment has become an option for some patients, with a substantial inpact on quality of life, particularly for young women who want to have a family, but also for elderly patients who present with several comorbidities. In the last 15 years, different studies have analyzed the outcome of patients with sustained deep molecular remission (DMR) who discontinued TKIs, reporting rates of treatment-free remission (TFR) ranging from 33% to 66%, depending on the definition of molecular relapse. More recently, reports on TKI discontinuation in the real life settings have included hundreds of patients. Some criticisms have emarged—for istance, treatment response for patients with atypical transcripts cannot be measured using the standard molecular methods that are used for p210 BCR-ABL1; thus, ideally, these patients are not eligible for attempting drug discontinuation. The application of new technologies such as digital (d)PCR in these rare cases is required. Interest in dPCR is also growing due to its higher accuracy in the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) and, therefore, in a possible better prognostication of relapse after stopping treatment.

Unfortunately, not all patients fulfil the criteria for stopping treatment, and we all know that TKIs do not work for everyone. Approximately half of patients do not optimmally respond or become resistant or intolerant to TKIs over time, requiring alternative approaches. There is a paucity of literature on the long-term outcome of patients who achieve a complete cytogenetec response (CCyR) but never achieve a major molecular remission (MMR). Trasnsplant is still an option for CML patients; however, except for patients in blast crisis, indications for bone marrow transplantation need to be supported by more evidence.

Many molecules are being tested in clinical trials. Cancer immunology, particularly NK and T cell-mediated immune responses, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells and Treg-mediated immune suppression can play important roles in inducing and mantaining remission. Immunotherapy is still considered an optional combination therapy for the eradication of the disease as Interferon for a long time in CML history.

Management of CML in advanced phases is still a topic of concern because survival after prograssion is dimal. There are no validated markers to predict blast crisis. Risk scores, such as Sokal and ELTS, are only based on clinical parameters. It is desirable that in the future, a combination of clinical and gene expression signatures may contribute to tailoring a selection of frontline treatments in the chronic phase to avoid progression.

Dr. Carmen Fava
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • prognostic factors
  • new techniques for MRD monitoring
  • atypical transcripts
  • long term outcome
  • new and combination therapies
  • genetic signature

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

10 pages, 604 KiB  
Article
A Retrospective Analysis about Frequency of Monitoring in Italian Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients after Discontinuation
by Matteo Dragani, Giovanna Rege Cambrin, Paola Berchialla, Irene Dogliotti, Gianantonio Rosti, Fausto Castagnetti, Isabella Capodanno, Bruno Martino, Marco Cerrano, Dario Ferrero, Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini, Monica Crugnola, Chiara Elena, Massimo Breccia, Alessandra Iurlo, Daniele Cattaneo, Sara Galimberti, Antonella Gozzini, Monica Bocchia, Francesca Lunghi, Michele Cedrone, Nicola Sgherza, Luigia Luciano, Sabina Russo, Marco Santoro, Valentina Giai, Giovanni Caocci, Luciano Levato, Elisabetta Abruzzese, Federica Sora, Giuseppe Saglio and Carmen Favaadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(11), 3692; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113692 - 17 Nov 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2285
Abstract
Successful discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has been achieved in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Careful molecular monitoring after discontinuation warrants safe and prompt resumption of therapy. We retrospectively evaluated how molecular monitoring has been conducted in Italy in a cohort [...] Read more.
Successful discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has been achieved in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Careful molecular monitoring after discontinuation warrants safe and prompt resumption of therapy. We retrospectively evaluated how molecular monitoring has been conducted in Italy in a cohort of patients who discontinued tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment per clinical practice. The outcome of these patients has recently been reported—281 chronic-phase CML patients were included in this subanalysis. Median follow-up since discontinuation was 2 years. Overall, 2203 analyses were performed, 17.9% in the first three months and 38.4% in the first six months. Eighty-six patients lost major molecular response (MMR) in a mean time of 5.7 months—65 pts (75.6%) during the first six months. We evaluated the number of patients who would experience a delay in diagnosis of MMR loss if a three-month monitoring schedule was adopted. In the first 6 months, 19 pts (29.2%) would have a one-month delay, 26 (40%) a 2-month delay. Very few patients would experience a delay in the following months. A less intense frequency of monitoring, particularly after the first 6 months off treatment, would not have affected the success of treatment-free remission (TFR) nor put patients at risk of progression. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Diagnosis and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 280 KiB  
Article
Cardiovascular Events throughout the Disease Course in Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia Patients Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors—A Single-Centre Retrospective Study
by Andreea Varga, Ioan Tilea, Dorina Nastasia Petra, Mariana-Cornelia Tilinca, Mirela Liana Gliga and Smaranda Demian
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(10), 3269; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103269 - 12 Oct 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1944
Abstract
Introduction. Cardiovascular risk factors, pre-existing comorbidities, molecular factors, and the direct effects of second- and third-generation BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors on the vascular endothelium contribute to the progression of cardiovascular (CV) events, especially atherothrombotic conditions. The study objective was to evaluate comorbidities, the [...] Read more.
Introduction. Cardiovascular risk factors, pre-existing comorbidities, molecular factors, and the direct effects of second- and third-generation BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors on the vascular endothelium contribute to the progression of cardiovascular (CV) events, especially atherothrombotic conditions. The study objective was to evaluate comorbidities, the cardiovascular risk profile, and events throughout the chronic myeloid leukaemia disease course. Methods. Retrospective data from adults who experienced haematology treatment at a single centre were continuously updated and followed throughout the disease course. A total of 43 subjects conforming with the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study protocol were finally recruited. The median disease course was 77.0 ± 17.5 months. Statistical analyses were performed. Results. More than three CV risk factors were identified in 41.9% of cases. Almost half of the cases had relevant comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 4), and no statistically significant comorbidities were found when comparing the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment subgroups (p = 0.53). The patients at high and very high CV risk, according to Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) risk classification, had 75.0% CV events (12/22 patients), p = 0.45. Throughout the disease course, 19 cardiovascular events were reported in 37.2% patients (13 males/3 females, p < 0.03). Conclusion. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study exploring cardiovascular risk factors in Romanian chronic myeloid leukaemia patients. This study reinforces the need for close long-term follow-up that should be performed by a multidisciplinary team. The target should be not only the disease and specific drug-related toxicities but, also, the identification of cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors before the commencement of and throughout TKI therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Diagnosis and Treatment)
11 pages, 959 KiB  
Article
Outcomes of Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia after Treatment with Multiple Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors
by Jee Hyun Kong, Elliott F. Winton, Leonard T. Heffner, Manila Gaddh, Brittany Hill, Jessica Neely, Angela Hatcher, Meena Joseph, Martha Arellano, Fuad El-Rassi, Audrey Kim, Jean Hanna Khoury and Vamsi K. Kota
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(5), 1542; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051542 - 20 May 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2832
Abstract
We sought to evaluate the outcomes of chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in an era where five tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are commercially available for the treatment of CML. Records of patients diagnosed with CP CML, treated with TKIs and referred [...] Read more.
We sought to evaluate the outcomes of chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in an era where five tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are commercially available for the treatment of CML. Records of patients diagnosed with CP CML, treated with TKIs and referred to our center were reviewed. Between January 2005 and April 2016, 206 patients were followed for a median of 48.8 (1.4–190.1) months. A total of 76 (37%) patients received one TKI, 73 (35%) received two TKIs and 57 (28%) were exposed to >3 TKIs (3 TKIs, n = 33; 4 TKIs, n = 17; 5 TKIs, n = 7). Nineteen (9.2%) patients progressed to advanced phases of CML (accelerated phase, n = 6; myeloid blastic phase, n = 4; lymphoid blastic phase, n = 9). One third (n = 69) achieved complete molecular response (CMR) at first-line treatment. An additional 55 patients achieved CMR after second-line treatment. Twenty-five patients (12.1%) attempted TKI discontinuation and 14 (6.8%) stopped TKIs for a median of 6.3 months (range 1–53.4). The 10-year progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) rates were 81% and 87%, respectively. OS after 10-years, based on TKI exposure, was 100% (1 TKI), 82% (2 TKIs), 87% (3 TKIs), 75% (4 TKIs) and 55% (5 TKIs). The best OS was observed in patients tolerating and responding to first line TKI, but multiple TKIs led patients to gain treatment-free remission. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Diagnosis and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 1586 KiB  
Article
Novel Multiplex Droplet Digital PCR Assays to Monitor Minimal Residual Disease in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Showing Atypical BCR-ABL1 Transcripts
by Jessica Petiti, Marco Lo Iacono, Matteo Dragani, Lucrezia Pironi, Cristina Fantino, Maria Cristina Rapanotti, Fabrizio Quarantelli, Barbara Izzo, Mariadomenica Divona, Giovanna Rege-Cambrin, Giuseppe Saglio, Enrico Marco Gottardi, Daniela Cilloni and Carmen Fava
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(5), 1457; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051457 - 13 May 2020
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 3290
Abstract
BCR-ABL1 fusion transcript is the minimal residual disease marker in chronic myeloid leukemia; 2% of patients show unusual breakpoints generating atypical transcripts, not quantifiable by standardized real-time PCR (RT–PCR). Response monitoring is performed by non-quantitative NESTED PCR, useless for evaluating patients’ molecular remission, [...] Read more.
BCR-ABL1 fusion transcript is the minimal residual disease marker in chronic myeloid leukemia; 2% of patients show unusual breakpoints generating atypical transcripts, not quantifiable by standardized real-time PCR (RT–PCR). Response monitoring is performed by non-quantitative NESTED PCR, useless for evaluating patients’ molecular remission, excluding them from treatment-free-remission protocols. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is highly sensitive technology, allowing an absolute quantification independent of standard curves. Based on this, we have developed assays able to evaluate the molecular response in atypical patients. We designed new ddPCR-based molecular assays able to quantify atypical BCR-ABL1 transcripts, with a detection limit of 0.001%, validated in a cohort of 65 RNA from 11 patients. Fifty samples were identified congruently by ddPCR and NESTED PCR (40 positives and 10 negatives for atypical BCR–ABL1 transcript), while 11 positive samples were detected only by ddPCR. Our results highlight ddPCR usefulness, primarily when the BCR–ABL1/ABL1 level is less than 1.5% and NESTED PCR results are often inaccurate. Furthermore, we identified 3 patients who maintained a deep molecular response for at least one year, who could be considered good candidates for treatment-free remission approaches. Here, we describe a new promising molecular approach, highly sensitive, to monitor atypical BCR–ABL1 patients, paving the foundation to include them in treatment-free remission protocols. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Diagnosis and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop