Multiple Sclerosis: Diagnosis, Treatment and Clinical Management

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Clinical Neurology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 25 February 2025 | Viewed by 1533

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Multiple Sclerosis Center, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
Interests: neuroimmunology; clinical neurology

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

It is a great pleasure and honor to invite you to contribute a paper to this Special Issue of the Journal of Clinical Medicine on Multiple Sclerosis.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune-mediated neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system characterized by chronic inflammatory demyelination and axonal transection. MS typically presents during young adulthood and can lead to physical disability and cognitive impairment resulting in a general reduction in patients’ quality of life. The McDonald Criteria (2017) enable the early diagnosis of MS if compared to the past,  based on a combination of signs and symptoms, MRI and laboratory findings. This provides an opportunity to commence treatment that evidences high efficacy from the very beginning. The advanced and correct clinical management of the disease could improve the outcomes and quality of life of MS patients.

The aim of this JCM Special Issue, entitled “Multiple Sclerosis: Diagnosis, Treatment and Clinical Management”, is to provide an overview of the latest advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease.

Prof. Dr. Carlo Avolio
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • multiple sclerosis
  • MRI
  • cerebrospinal fluid
  • diagnosis
  • biomarkers
  • treatment
  • disease modifying treatment (DMT)
  • disease management

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

12 pages, 397 KiB  
Article
Can International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Be Used for Prediction of Work Capacity and Employment Status in Multiple Sclerosis?
by Daiva Valadkevičienė, Dalius Jatužis, Irena Žukauskaitė and Indre Bileviciute-Ljungar
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(14), 4195; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144195 - 18 Jul 2024
Viewed by 517
Abstract
Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) affects many body functions and activities, including work capacity and ability to work. An evaluation of work-related parameters is important to understand the barriers to maintaining the job. The aim of this study was to evaluate if a Comprehensive [...] Read more.
Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) affects many body functions and activities, including work capacity and ability to work. An evaluation of work-related parameters is important to understand the barriers to maintaining the job. The aim of this study was to evaluate if a Comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) core set for MS can be used to predict work capacity and employment status. Methods: The cohort included 151 participants with MS (99 female/52 male, mean age 49 years) referred for a work capacity evaluation. Results: 71 (47.0%) were employed and a major part (131, 86.7%) had a work capacity between 20 and 40% with no difference between those who were employed and those who were unemployed. The analysis revealed that age and the following categories explained 68.8% of the work capacity: b770 Gait pattern functions; b730 Muscle power functions; b134 Sleep functions; d845 Acquiring, keeping and terminating a job; and b620 Urination functions. The following categories in 79.5% predicted ability to work: b164 Higher-level cognitive functions; d510 Washing oneself; d630; Preparing meals; and d870 Economic self-sufficiency. Conclusions: Here, we show that different functions/activities predicted work capacity in comparison with employment status in MS. Therefore, ICF should be implemented when assessing work ability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multiple Sclerosis: Diagnosis, Treatment and Clinical Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 241 KiB  
Article
Effectiveness, Safety and Patients’ Satisfaction of Nabiximols (Sativex®) on Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity and Related Symptoms in a Swiss Multicenter Study
by Rosaria Sacco, Gianna Carla Riccitelli, Giulio Disanto, Julien Bogousslavsky, Ariane Cavelti, David Czell, Christian Philipp Kamm, Uta Kliesch, Simon Peter Ramseier, Claudio Gobbi and Chiara Zecca
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(10), 2907; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13102907 - 14 May 2024
Viewed by 729
Abstract
Background: Cannabinoid oro-mucosal spray nabiximols is approved for patients with moderate to severe multiple sclerosis spasticity (MSS) resistant to other antispastic medications. Few real-world data are available on the effectiveness, safety and patients’ satisfaction in MS patients treated with nabiximols as monotherapy. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background: Cannabinoid oro-mucosal spray nabiximols is approved for patients with moderate to severe multiple sclerosis spasticity (MSS) resistant to other antispastic medications. Few real-world data are available on the effectiveness, safety and patients’ satisfaction in MS patients treated with nabiximols as monotherapy. Methods: To investigate the effectiveness, tolerability and satisfaction of nabiximols in a real-life multicentric Swiss cohort as monotherapy or with stable doses of other antispastic medications, and explore clinical features which may predict treatment response. The following data were collected at treatment start (baseline) and 12 weeks thereafter: Modified Ashworth scale (MAS), scores at numerical rating scales ranging from 0 (absent) to 10 (considerable) for effect on spasticity (sNRS), pain (pNRS), gait (gNRS), urinary symptoms (uNRS), tolerability (tNRS) as assessed by the treating neurologist, and overall treatment satisfaction (TsNRS) and tolerability (tNRS) as assessed by the patient. Results: Ninety-five patients (44 relapsing remitting, 37 secondary progressive and 14 primary progressive MS; median age = 53 (IQR 45–62); female 70%; median EDSS 6 (IQR 4–6), concomitant antispastic treatments in 54% of patients) were included. From baseline to week 12, median MAS score decreased from 3.0 to 2.0 (p < 0.001). Median scores of the each NRS also significantly decreased (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). At week 12, the median TsNRS and tTS scores were 8/10 (IQR: 6–9) and 9/10 (IQR: 7–10), respectively, and 93.7% of patients continued to use nabiximols at the average dose of six sprays/day. No clinical factors, including use of nabiximols as add on vs. monotherapy, were associated with responder status. Conclusions: Our first Swiss, multicentric, observational, real-life study supports and enhances previous finding of nabiximols as monotherapy and as add-on therapy, being an effective, safe and well-tolerated treatment option for resistant MS spasticity and spasticity-related symptoms (pain, bladder dysfunction and gait). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multiple Sclerosis: Diagnosis, Treatment and Clinical Management)
Back to TopTop