Clinical Research and Treatment of Endocarditis

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Cardiovascular Medicine".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 July 2024) | Viewed by 475

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
The Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
Interests: endocarditis; pericarditis; infective endocarditis; valvular heart disease

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious, progressive and fatal disease with an estimated annual incidence of 3–10 cases per 100,000 person-years. The in-hospital mortality is estimated around 20%, increasing to 25–30% at 6 months. Aggressive medical therapy and early surgical intervention confer a mortality benefit. Surgery is undertaken in 40–70% of patients with IE, with three principal indications: valve dysfunction leading to heart failure, uncontrolled infection, and prevention of embolism. Perivalvular complications, including abscesses, pseudo aneurysms and fistulae, considered as a complex manifestation, are reported in up to 37% of IE cases. These cases are manifested with poor biological condition, present surgical challenges and associated with increased morbidity and mortality rate. Late diagnosis is commonly associated with advanced presentation of IE. Therefore, a great effort should be done by primary physician and internist in order to diagnose these patients earlier.

The diagnosis of IE is challenging and is based on imaging, microbiological results and clinical criteria. Because of the challenging diagnosis and the complexity of the disease, a multidisciplinary approach has been established, termed Endocarditis Team (ET). However, contradictory reports exist regarding the yield of the multidisciplinary endocarditis team and its impact on timing for surgical intervention, complication rate and outcome. In addition to the valuable discussion of the ET about a specific patient, it may be important to establish an “education program” to the community which may promote earlier diagnosis and treatment.

The use of prosthetic heart valves in patients with valvular heart disease is increasing worldwide. Mechanical heart valves are often used in younger patients whereas more and more older patients usually receive biological or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in a native valve or in previous implanted prosthetic biological valve, i.e., valve in valve (VIV). One to six percent of all patients with heart valve prostheses are diagnosed with prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), and over 20% of all cases of infective endocarditis (IE) are classified as PVE. In‐hospital mortality among patients with PVE is significantly higher than in those diagnosed with native valve endocarditis. Therefore, a specific consideration should be applied for patients diagnosed with PVE. This topic should be elaborated.

Neurological complications occur in about one-fourth of patients with infective endocarditis. A discussion is required for the usefulness of systematic brain imaging for asymptomatic patients and the preferred treatment for patients with silent brain lesions. Additionally, the timing of intervention for patients with acute septic emboli and mycotic aneurysms, is still debatable and should be addressed.

Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE), or marantic endocarditis, refers to a spectrum of lesions ranging from microscopic aggregates of platelets to large vegetation on previously undamaged heart valves in the absence of a bloodstream bacterial infection. The approach for this type of endocarditis should be better elucidated, in the aspects of diagnosis, medical treatment, indication for intervention and the operative outcomes.

I hope that this issue will contribute to better understanding of the above topics and other challenges related to Endocarditis.

Dr. Ram Sharony
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • infective endocarditis
  • endocarditis
  • valvular heart disease
  • perivalvular complications
  • transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

10 pages, 1085 KiB  
Article
The Usefulness of the CHA2DS2-VASc Score to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Infective Endocarditis
by Edward Itelman, Ram Sharony, Ashraf Hamdan, Alaa Atamna, Hila Shaked, Victor Rubchevsky, Yaron D. Barak, Hanna Bernstine, Yaron Shapira, Mordehay Vaturi, Hadass Ofek Epstein, Ran Kornowski and Katia Orvin
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(16), 4917; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164917 - 20 Aug 2024
Viewed by 225
Abstract
Introduction: Despite diagnostic and therapeutic advances, infective endocarditis (IE) is still associated with high mortality rates. Currently, there are no good prognostic tools for the risk assessment of patients with IE. The CHA2DS2-VASc score, used to estimate the risk [...] Read more.
Introduction: Despite diagnostic and therapeutic advances, infective endocarditis (IE) is still associated with high mortality rates. Currently, there are no good prognostic tools for the risk assessment of patients with IE. The CHA2DS2-VASc score, used to estimate the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), has been shown to be a powerful predictor of stroke and death in patients without known AF associated with other cardiovascular conditions. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of the CHA2DS2-VASc score as a prognostic tool in a population of patients with IE. Methods: The Rabin Medical Center Endocarditis Team (RMCET) registry is a retrospective cohort of all patients evaluated at our center due to acute or sub-acute bacterial endocarditis. The CHA2DS2-VASc score was extracted for all patients. All-cause mortality was depicted for all patients. Results: The cohort included 330 patients with a mean age of 65.2 ± 14.7 years (70% men). During a median follow-up of 24 months [IQR 4.7–48.6], 121 (36.7%) patients died. The median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3, and any score above 2 was associated with increased overall mortality (50.8% vs. 19.9%, p < 0.001). A multivariate model incorporating important confounders not included in the CHA2DS2-VASc model showed consistent results with a risk increase of 121% for the higher CHA2DS2-VASc score groups (HR 2.21 [CI 1.12–4.39], p = 0.023). Conclusions: IE currently has no good risk stratification models for clinical practice. The CHA2DS2-VASc score might serve as a simple and available tool to stratify risk among patients with IE. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Research and Treatment of Endocarditis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop