Emerging Trends in Visceral and Gastrointestinal Surgery

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "General Surgery".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 28 March 2025 | Viewed by 201

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail
Guest Editor
Department of Thoracic Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada
Interests: esophagus; stomach; cancer; sarcopenia; frailty

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
St Mark’s Hospital and Academic Institute, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, London HA1 3UJ, UK
Interests: inflammatory bowel disease; fistula; colorectal cancer; robotics; artificial intelligence

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

An evidence-based approach underpins and prompts change in modern surgical therapy. Driven by an improved understading of the pathological basis of disease and its treatment alongside an imperative to improve outcomes, these changes affect all disciplines of visceral surgery. To complicate matters further, advancements in diagnostic and surgical technology have heralded changes in theraputic indications, with the advent of modern medications greatly influecing how and when surgeons intervene. In this Special Issue, we welcome authors to submit papers on the emerging clinical trends in visceral surgery including foregut, hepatobiliary, colorectal, and trauma surgery. We look forward to receving your contributions.

Dr. James Tankel
Dr. Kapil Sahnan
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • visceral surgery
  • innovation
  • emerging therapies
  • foregut surgery
  • hepatobiliary surgery
  • colorectal surgery

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 2364 KiB  
Article
The Relationship between Treatment Response and Overall Survival in Borderline, Non-Resectable and Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX
by Alex Barenboim, Diego Mercer, Kapil Sahnan, Alex Gaffan, Or Goren, Sharon Halperin, Eli Brazowski, Sharon Pelles Avraham, Joseph M. Klausner and Nir Lubezky
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(17), 5206; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175206 - 2 Sep 2024
Abstract
Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-recommended treatment for patients with borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) involves a combination of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy and the curative surgical resection of the tumor. This study seeks to identify the [...] Read more.
Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-recommended treatment for patients with borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) involves a combination of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy and the curative surgical resection of the tumor. This study seeks to identify the clinical, radiological, laboratory, and pathologic predictors that can anticipate the oncological outcomes of patients. Methods: In this study, we conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone curative surgical resection for BRPC, LAPC, or resectable disease with high-risk features after receiving neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX at two institutions. We evaluated by means of multivariate analysis whether clinical and laboratory response, tumor markers, radiological response, and pathologic tumor response grade correlated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: The study enrolled a total of 70 patients with BRPC, LAPC, and resectable disease with high-risk features who underwent resection after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. Age above 65 years and fewer than nine cycles of chemotherapy (OR 4.2; 95% CI 1.4–12.0; p-value 0.007); locally advanced tumors after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) (OR 7.0; 95% CI 1.9–25.7; p-value 0.003); and lymph node disease and histological tumor regression grade 2 and 3 (OR 4.3; 95% CI 0.9–19.2; p-value 0.05) were risk factors linked to adverse OS and DFS. The median OS and DFS were 33 (22–43.9) months and 16.5 (11.3–21.6) months, respectively. Conclusions: Classification as a LA tumor after NAT was the only preoperative radiological factor that predicted adverse survival in patients undergoing curative surgery after NAT. Other clinical, biochemical, and radiological measures of response were not found to predict OS. Patient age, the cumulative administration of more than eight cycles of chemotherapy, and a significant pathological response were associated with better OS. The results of this study are important for treatment decision-making and prognostication in patients with BRPC and LAPC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Trends in Visceral and Gastrointestinal Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop