New Trends in Biomaterials and Implants for Dentistry (2nd Edition)

A special issue of Journal of Functional Biomaterials (ISSN 2079-4983). This special issue belongs to the section "Dental Biomaterials".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 November 2024 | Viewed by 571

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto 14040-904, SP, Brazil
Interests: bone substitutes; guided bone regeneration; implant surface; implant surgery; collagen matrix; periodontal regeneration
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Biomaterials and dental implants form part of a dental surgeon's arsenal of resources for the treatment and rehabilitation of atrophic bone ridges. The aim of this Special Issue is to present the current scenario of new trends in products, processes and techniques related to biomaterials and implants for use in dentistry. For this, we invite manuscripts that focus on a wide range of issues and concerns regarding the subject of the Special Issue, including, but not limited to, the following: bone substitutes, biologic modulators for bone and soft tissue regeneration, scaffolds, resorbable and non-resorbable membranes for guided bone and tissue regeneration, collagen matrices, implant surfaces, implant surgery, implant macrostructures and titanium mesh. In vitro, in vivo (animal) and clinical human studies will be accepted for evaluation, as well as systematic literature reviews that address the topic of this Special Issue.

Prof. Dr. Sergio Scombatti De Souza
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Functional Biomaterials is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • bone substitutes
  • dental membranes
  • guided bone regeneration
  • bone graft
  • collagen matrix
  • implant surface
  • implant surgery
  • implant macrostructure
  • alveolar reconstruction

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 5642 KiB  
Article
Comparison between Conventional and Digital Workflow in Implant Prosthetic Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
by Massimo Corsalini, Giuseppe Barile, Francesco Ranieri, Edvige Morea, Tommaso Corsalini, Saverio Capodiferro and Rosario Roberto Palumbo
J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15(6), 149; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15060149 - 31 May 2024
Viewed by 410
Abstract
The progress of digital technologies in dental prosthodontics is fast and increasingly accurate, allowing practitioners to simplify their daily work. These technologies aim to substitute conventional techniques progressively, but their real efficiency and predictability are still under debate. Many systematic reviews emphasize the [...] Read more.
The progress of digital technologies in dental prosthodontics is fast and increasingly accurate, allowing practitioners to simplify their daily work. These technologies aim to substitute conventional techniques progressively, but their real efficiency and predictability are still under debate. Many systematic reviews emphasize the lack of clinical RCTs that compare digital and traditional workflow. To address this evidence, we conducted a three-arm designed clinical RCT, which compares fully digital, combined digital, and analogic and fully analog workflows. We aimed to compare the clinical properties of each workflow regarding interproximal (IC) and occlusal contact (OC), marginal fit, impression time (IT), and patient satisfaction through a VAS scale. In total, 72 patients were included in the study. The IC and OC of the digital workflow were better than the others (p < 0.001), which obtained similar results. No difference between implant–abutment fit was observed (p = 0.5966). The IT was shorter in the digital workflow than the others (p < 0.001), which were similar. Patient satisfaction was higher in the digital workflow than in the conventional one. Despite the limitations, this study’s results support better accuracy and patient tolerance of digital workflow than of conventional techniques, suggesting it as a viable alternative to the latter when performed by clinicians experienced in digital dentistry. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Biomaterials and Implants for Dentistry (2nd Edition))
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop