Systemic Recovery: Lessons from COVID-19, Modeling, Analysis, and Policy Implications

A special issue of Journal of Risk and Financial Management (ISSN 1911-8074). This special issue belongs to the section "Applied Economics and Finance".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (28 February 2022) | Viewed by 31319

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
Interests: systemic risk; financial stability; stock-flow consistent models; macroeconomics and climate change

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Economics Department, Aix-Marseille University, 13007 Marseille, France
Interests: microeconomics; general equilibrium; economic theory; mathematical economics; international trade theory; game theory; quantitative economics; history of economic thought; international financial economics; industrial economics; the economics of information; welfare economics; public economics; market structure; the economics of interaction; behavioural economics; complex economics

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
the New Approaches to Economic Challenges (NAEC) Unit, OECD 2, rue André Pascal, 75016 Paris, France
Interests: economic development; economics; globalization; international economics; international trade; theory and policy; political economy; political economy and development

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed deep fissures in the socio-economic system, which have been developing for a long time. Consequently, analytical frameworks have been broadened to better assess the nexus between economic growth and inequality on the one hand (inclusive growth) and between environment and growth on the other (green growth). Less progress has been made on the social-ecology nexus. There is an urgent need to understand and respond to the interconnections between financial, economic, environmental, and societal systems.

This Special Issue will focus on (i) lessons from the pandemic, in particular the effectiveness of policy responses in different countries, (ii) new integrated modeling approaches that have emerged from the crisis; and (iii) recommendations to build a more resilient system to protect ourselves from such events in the future.

Relevant topics to be addressed include the merging of social mixing and economic data in integrated epidemiological-economic models; the disconnect between financial markets and the broader economy during the COVID crisis; the role of public and private debt during the recovery; the nature of work and changes in productivity; and the investment necessary to radically change the course of our system to prepare it for climate crises.  

Prof. Dr. Matheus R. Grasselli
Prof. Dr. Alan Kirman
Dr. William Hynes
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Risk and Financial Management is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • policy responses to COVID-19
  • integrated epidemiological-economic models
  • impact on financial markets and the role of central banks
  • resilience of socio-economic systems
  • inequality
  • energy transition

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (9 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review

7 pages, 222 KiB  
Editorial
Editorial: A Systemic Recovery
by Matheus R. Grasselli, Alan Kirman and William Hynes
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2022, 15(12), 578; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15120578 - 3 Dec 2022
Viewed by 1303
Abstract
This Special Issue is about how we learn and apply the lessons of the COVID-19 pandemic [...] Full article

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review

26 pages, 2753 KiB  
Article
The Interplay between COVID-19 and the Economy in Canada
by Vinicius Albani, Matheus Grasselli, Weijie Pang and Jorge P. Zubelli
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2022, 15(10), 476; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15100476 - 18 Oct 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3735
Abstract
We propose a generalized susceptible-exposed-infected-removed (SEIR) model to track COVID-19 in Canadian provinces, taking into account the impact of the pandemics on unemployment. The model is based on a network representing provinces, where the contact between individuals from different locations is defined by [...] Read more.
We propose a generalized susceptible-exposed-infected-removed (SEIR) model to track COVID-19 in Canadian provinces, taking into account the impact of the pandemics on unemployment. The model is based on a network representing provinces, where the contact between individuals from different locations is defined by a data-driven mixing matrix. Moreover, we use time-dependent parameters to account for the dynamical evolution of the disease incidence, as well as changes in the rates of hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and death. Unemployment is accounted for as a reduction in the social interaction, which translates into smaller transmission parameters. Conversely, the model assumes that higher proportions of infected individuals reduce overall economic activity and therefore increase unemployment. We tested the model using publicly available sources and found that it is able to reproduce the reported data with remarkable in-sample accuracy. We also tested the model’s ability to make short-term out-of-sample forecasts and found it very satisfactory, except in periods of rapid changes in behavior. Finally, we present long-term predictions for both epidemiological and economic variables under several future vaccination scenarios. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 513 KiB  
Article
COVID-19 Mortality and Economic Losses: The Role of Policies and Structural Conditions
by Weichen Wang, Andrea Gurgone, Humberto Martínez, Maria Cristina Barbieri Góes, Ettore Gallo, Ádam Kerényi, Enrico Maria Turco, Carla Coburger and Pêdra D. S. Andrade
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2022, 15(8), 354; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15080354 - 8 Aug 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3205
Abstract
The response of governments to the COVID-19 outbreak was foremost oriented to two objectives: saving lives and limiting economic losses. However, the effectiveness and success factors of interventions were unknown ex-ante. This study aims to shed light on the drivers of countries’ performances [...] Read more.
The response of governments to the COVID-19 outbreak was foremost oriented to two objectives: saving lives and limiting economic losses. However, the effectiveness and success factors of interventions were unknown ex-ante. This study aims to shed light on the drivers of countries’ performances during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. We measure performances by excess mortality and GDP growth adjusted for additional fiscal stimulus. We conduct an empirical analysis in two stages: first, using hierarchical clustering, we partition countries based on their similarity in health and economic outcomes. Second, we identify the key drivers of outcomes in each country cluster by regression analysis, which include linear, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and logit models. We argue that differences in countries’ performances can be traced back both to policy responses to COVID-19 and structural conditions, the latter being immutable over the pandemic. Three relevant structural conditions emerge from the results: trade reliance on services, corruption, and the size of the vulnerable population (elderly, low-income, smoking, or cardiovascular-failing). Policies such as large-scale open public testing and additional fiscal stimulus in non-health could help reduce excess mortality, which might lead to lower economic losses. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 1952 KiB  
Article
Economic Stimulus and Financial Instability: Recent Case of the U.S. Household
by Youngna Choi
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2022, 15(6), 266; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15060266 - 11 Jun 2022
Viewed by 2932
Abstract
The effectiveness of government policies and economic stimuli during the 2007 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic are compared in this study. While the 2007 financial crisis started in the real estate market and spread through the contagion effect to other sectors, the [...] Read more.
The effectiveness of government policies and economic stimuli during the 2007 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic are compared in this study. While the 2007 financial crisis started in the real estate market and spread through the contagion effect to other sectors, the pandemic halted the all sectors of the global economy simultaneously. In the United States, where the social safety net is not as strong as other advanced economies, the unemployment rate skyrocketed and many families lost income. The federal government countered with various relief packages, which have been, unlike the rounds of quantitative easing prevalent after the 2007 financial crisis, direct payments to households and businesses. The Agent Instability Indicator and default elasticity coefficient are used to quantitatively assess the financial instability and default risk of subgroups of United States households classified by percentile of income and net worth. It turns out that the financial instability level of the United States household during the pandemic has not been as high as that during the 2007 crisis and the Great Recession. It is concluded that the direct handout of cash—so called helicopter money—is more effective at preventing financial collapse and stabilizing the economy than quantitative easing through asset purchase. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1202 KiB  
Article
Budgetary Allocations and Government Response to COVID-19 Pandemic in South Africa and Nigeria
by Agunyai Samuel Chukwudi and Ojakorotu Victor
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2022, 15(6), 252; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15060252 - 2 Jun 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3678
Abstract
The eruption of the novel virus brought to the global scene the prediction that Africa would be worse hit by the pandemic. This prediction was partly built on the widely recognized fact that Africa is the continent with the weakest public health care [...] Read more.
The eruption of the novel virus brought to the global scene the prediction that Africa would be worse hit by the pandemic. This prediction was partly built on the widely recognized fact that Africa is the continent with the weakest public health care system and the lowest budgetary allocations to health. However, contrary to this prediction, the COVID-19 death rate in Africa has been low compared to in other continents. Debates on Africa’s low COVID-19 death rate have generated mixed reactions, the majority of which have centred on beliefs and superstition about hot weather and Africa’s youth-dominated society. Little or none of these reactions have attributed the low COVID-19 death rate to swift and prudent budgetary adjustment, which partly aided a swift response from some African governments. Indeed, not many studies have examined the swiftness in the response of some African governments and prudent budgetary adjustment in tackling the spread of COVID-19. This paper, through secondary data, advances knowledge on how budget revision aided government response to the COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa and Nigeria. It found that both countries adjusted their budgetary allocations in response to COVID-19. It further indicates that South Africa, through budgetary revision, allocated more funds to government agencies in charge of COVID-19 and various relief packages than Nigeria. Moreover, it indicates that the swift budgetary adjustment by both countries partly aided a quick government response that progressively flattened the curve and, in the long run, partly contributed to fiscal impulse and deferrals. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

38 pages, 3056 KiB  
Article
Mitigation Strategies for COVID-19: Lessons from the K-SEIR Model Calibrated to the Observable Data
by Alexander Lipton and Marcos Lopez de Prado
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2022, 15(6), 248; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15060248 - 1 Jun 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2851
Abstract
This article develops a detailed epidemiological multi-factor model, the K-susceptible–exposed–infected–removed (K-SEIR) model, and several simpler sub-models as its building blocks. The general model enables us to account for all the relevant COVID-19 features, its disparate impact on different population groups, and interactions within [...] Read more.
This article develops a detailed epidemiological multi-factor model, the K-susceptible–exposed–infected–removed (K-SEIR) model, and several simpler sub-models as its building blocks. The general model enables us to account for all the relevant COVID-19 features, its disparate impact on different population groups, and interactions within and between the groups. It also includes the availability (or lack thereof) of spare hospital beds and intensive care units (ICU) to accommodate the pent-up demand due to the pandemic. We use the most recent hospitalization and mortality data to calibrate the model. Since our model is multi-factor, we can use it to simulate and analyze the consequences of the sheltering-in-place for each specific group and compare the lives saved and lost due to this measure. We show that in countries with well-developed healthcare systems and a population willing to abide by suitable containment and mitigation procedures, the sheltering in place of the entire community is excessive and harmful when considered holistically. At the same time, sealing nursing homes as thoroughly as possible to avoid high infection and mortality rates is an absolute necessity. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 425 KiB  
Article
Business Closures and (Re)Openings in Real-Time Using Google Places: Proof of Concept
by Daniel E. Rigobon, Thibaut Duprey, Artur Kotlicki, Philip Schnattinger , Soheil Baharian and Thomas R. Hurd
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2022, 15(4), 183; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15040183 - 15 Apr 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4168
Abstract
We present a new estimation of business opening and closure rates using data from Google Places—the data set behind the Google Maps service. Our algorithm, through a bisection routine, counts the appearance and disappearance of “pins” that represent unique businesses. As a proof [...] Read more.
We present a new estimation of business opening and closure rates using data from Google Places—the data set behind the Google Maps service. Our algorithm, through a bisection routine, counts the appearance and disappearance of “pins” that represent unique businesses. As a proof of concept, we compute business opening and closure rates for the city of Ottawa during the reopening phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in mid-2021. The lifting of restrictions coincides with a wave of re-entry of temporarily closed businesses, suggesting that government support may have facilitated the survival of hibernating businesses. Our entry estimates are validated by a survey of new businesses. This methodology allows policymakers to monitor business dynamics in quasi-real-time during rapidly unfolding crises. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 259 KiB  
Article
The Drivers of Policies to Limit the Spread of COVID-19 in Europe
by Sebastien Bourdin, Slimane Ben Miled and Jamil Salhi
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2022, 15(2), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15020067 - 1 Feb 2022
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 3151
Abstract
While many articles have analyzed the effectiveness of the policies that aimed to limit the spread of COVID-19, very little research work has examined the determinants that drove these policies. Therefore, we proposed to study the determinants that led government authorities to implement [...] Read more.
While many articles have analyzed the effectiveness of the policies that aimed to limit the spread of COVID-19, very little research work has examined the determinants that drove these policies. Therefore, we proposed to study the determinants that led government authorities to implement more or less restrictive policies to limit the spread of the pandemic. Using the COVID-19 stringency index, we highlighted a positive effect of the incidence rate on the stringency level. Patient capacity in intensive care units was also a key variable. This is indicative of the capacity of countries to have a sufficient and appropriate health system to absorb such pandemic crises. On the other hand, we show that epidemiological data regarding the risk of excess mortality (diabetes, cancer, and cardiovascular pathologies) had a negative effect. We conclude by recalling the importance of policy coordination between countries when it comes to lowering the stringency levels of measures, in order to avoid a resurgence of the epidemic. Full article

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research

18 pages, 340 KiB  
Review
Enacting Economic Resilience: A Synthesis of Economic and Communication Frameworks
by Timothy Betts and Patrice M. Buzzanell
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2022, 15(4), 178; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15040178 - 13 Apr 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3476
Abstract
This work examines three frameworks for responding to economic disruption: risk mitigation, systemic recovery, and economic resilience. Specifically, by reviewing the metatheoretical commitments, analytic contexts, and implications of two economic perspectives, represented by risk mitigation and systemic recovery, we argue that current approaches [...] Read more.
This work examines three frameworks for responding to economic disruption: risk mitigation, systemic recovery, and economic resilience. Specifically, by reviewing the metatheoretical commitments, analytic contexts, and implications of two economic perspectives, represented by risk mitigation and systemic recovery, we argue that current approaches to understanding resilience in academic economics have failed to address ongoing and emergent disruptions in the economic and social world. In response, this work also reviews a possible synthesis of economic and communication frameworks. This review places the economic resilience framework, inspired by the communication theory of resilience, in conversation with extant literature in economics, communication studies, and other disciplines and concludes with an outline for further theoretical, methodological, and practical development. Full article
Back to TopTop