Feature Papers in Medical Research: 3rd Edition

A special issue of Life (ISSN 2075-1729). This special issue belongs to the section "Medical Research".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 January 2025 | Viewed by 452

Special Issue Editor

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are grateful to the researchers who contributed to the first and second volume of this issue:

Feature Papers in Medical Research: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/life/special_issues/SK0T5PC4U2

Feature Papers in Medical Research: 2nd Edition: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/life/special_issues/9GV5QM8A9T

We are pleased to announce the upcoming publication of our Special Issue, entitled “Feature Papers in Medical Research: 3rd Edition".

We aim to collect research articles and systematic reviews in all fields of medical research. Since the goal of this Special Issue is to present novel medical research, we encourage the Editorial Board Members of Life to contribute papers reflecting the latest progress in their field or to invite relevant experts and colleagues to do so.

Topics include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Dermatological research;
  • Cancer research;
  • Cardiovascular research;
  • General medicine;
  • Gastroenterological research;
  • Hematological research;
  • Immunological research;
  • Infectious diseases research;
  • Metabolism and endocrinology;
  • Nervous system research;
  • Nursing;
  • Pediatrics;
  • Pulmonary research;
  • Psychiatric research;
  • Rehabilitation;
  • Renal and urinary research;
  • Reproductive research and women's health;
  • Rheumatological research;
  • Skeletal and muscular research;
  • Vision research.

Prof. Dr. Christian Lehmann
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Life is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • dermatological research
  • cancer research
  • cardiovascular research
  • general medicine
  • gastroenterological research
  • hematological research
  • immunological research
  • infectious diseases research
  • metabolism and endocrinology
  • nervous system research
  • nursing
  • pediatrics
  • pulmonary research
  • psychiatric research
  • rehabilitation
  • renal and urinary research
  • reproductive research and women's health
  • rheumatological research
  • skeletal and muscular research
  • vision research

Related Special Issues

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

12 pages, 798 KiB  
Article
A More Targeted and Selective Use of Implantable Loop Recorders Improves the Effectiveness of Syncope Units: A Single-Center Experience
by Stefanos Archontakis, Evangelos Oikonomou, Konstantinos Sideris, Panagiotis Dourvas, Nikias Milaras, Panagiotis Kostakis, Tzonatan Klogkeri, Epameinondas Triantafyllou, Panagiotis Theofilis, Ioannis Ntalakouras, Petros Arsenos, Athanasia Gkika, Konstantinos Gatzoulis, Skevos Sideris and Dimitris Tousoulis
Life 2024, 14(7), 871; https://doi.org/10.3390/life14070871 - 12 Jul 2024
Viewed by 303
Abstract
Purpose: Syncope remains a common medical problem. Recently, the role of dedicated syncope units and implantable loop recorders has emerged in the investigation of unexplained syncope. This study aims to investigate the possibilities for a more rational and targeted use of various diagnostic [...] Read more.
Purpose: Syncope remains a common medical problem. Recently, the role of dedicated syncope units and implantable loop recorders has emerged in the investigation of unexplained syncope. This study aims to investigate the possibilities for a more rational and targeted use of various diagnostic tools. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, 196 patients with unexplained syncope were included between March 2019 and February 2023. Various diagnostic tools were utilized during the investigation, according to clinical judgement. Patients were retrospectively allocated into Group A (including those who, among other tests, underwent loop recorder insertion) and Group B (including patients investigated without loop recorder implantation). Data were compared with Group C, including patients assessed prior to syncope unit establishment. Results: There was no difference between Group A (n = 133) and Group B (n = 63) in the diagnostic yield (74% vs. 76%, p = 0.22). There were significant differences between Groups A and B regarding age (67.3 ± 16.9 years vs. 48.3 ± 19.1 years, p < 0.001) and cause of syncope (cardiogenic in 69% of Group A, reflex syncope in 77% of Group B, p < 0.001). Electrocardiography-based diagnosis occurred in 55% and 19% of Groups A and B, respectively (p < 0.001). The time to diagnosis was 4.2 ± 2.7 months in Group A and 7.5 ± 5.6 months in Group B (p < 0.001). In Group C, the diagnostic yield was 57.9% and the electrocardiography-based diagnostic yield was 18.3%. Conclusions: A selective use of loop recorders according to clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics increases the effectiveness of the structured syncope unit approach and further preserves financial resources. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Medical Research: 3rd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop