Religions, Cultural Memory and Heritage in the City: Reassembling a Plural Scenario

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 December 2024) | Viewed by 4599

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Fondazione Bruno Kessler, 38122 Trento, Italy
Interests: religious art and architecture; virtual reality; digital humanities; shared religious places

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Humanities, Roma Tre University, 00154 Rome, Italy
Interests: history of monasticism; geography of religions; religion and urban spaces; shared religious places

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In contemporary European and US society, within the framework of UNESCO 2003 Convention on Cultural Heritage urban spaces, religious places, such as churches, synagogues, mosques, and temples, as well as informal spaces, such as gardens, parks, and secular buildings, are the foundation for constructing tangible and intangible religious heritage (oral traditions, collective memories, shared practices), However, in an increasingly multicultural and multireligious landscape, there is a glaring knowledge gap around the role of religious minorities in the sedimentation of cultural memories and heritage in the city. In this Special Issue, we combine spatial and material approaches to religions and memory studies. This approach allows us to investigate various aspects, such as religious architecture and its symbolic value, the strategies and practices of communities in using and preserving religious spaces and artifacts in urban environments, and the complex historical and social dynamics involved in the local spatial and material constructions of plural and mixed cultures in cities.  According to Becci, Burchardt, and Casanova (2013) and Knott (2005), to move beyond the paradigm of urban secularization, spatial studies are essential for understanding religion and religious diversity in cities. The study of religious spaces looks at religious buildings and their symbolic significance, as well as the visibility or invisibility of religious communities and how they create, maintain, and seek out places (Becci, Burchardt, and Giorda 2017).

We will focus on the creation and preservation of cultural memory (Assmann 2011), as well as how official history incorporates public memory (Houdeck and Phillips 2017), tackling different cases in US and European urban contexts. Drawing upon the work of scholars from various fields, including the history of religions, philosophy, sociology, anthropology, and law, we delve into the political function of polarizing memories over disputes of specific shared religious spaces (Hayden et al., 2016). We will also address the role played by religious minorities (Stausberg, Van Der Haven, and Baffelli, 2023) in the creation of multiple memories in urban contexts. We deem this strategy to be particularly effective for reorganizing a dynamic field, where material and immaterial elements coexist with official history and memories.

The Special Issue aims to investigate the following questions in US and European urban contexts

  • How can religious places be a source of production of a tangible (i.e., spaces of worship, namely art and architecture, as well as objects and documents) and intangible heritage (i.e., collective memory, traditions, and processions, liturgies, oral traditions, and shared practices).?
  • How is this heritage preserved and passed on in the cultural memory of religious groups?
  • What have communities created, and how has it been shared?
  • What are the material and immaterial places where cultural and religious memories are debated and preserved in an urban context?

References:

Assmann, A. Cultural Memory and Western Civilization: Functions, Media, Archives; Cambridge University Press: 2011.

Becci, I., Burchardt, M. and Casanova, J. Topographies of Faith: Religion in Urban Spaces; Brill: 2013.

Becci, I., Burchardt, M. and Giorda, M. ‘Religious super-diversity and spatial strategies in two European cities’. Current Sociology 2017, 65, 73-91.

Hayden, R. et al. Antagonistic Tolerance: Competitive Sharing of Religious Sites and Spaces. Routledge: 2016.

Houdek, M. and Phillips, K., 2017. ‘Public Memory’. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication.

Knott, K. The Location of Religion: A Spatial Analysis; Equinox: London, UK, 2005.

Nora, P. Les Lieux de Mémoire; Gallimard: 1992.

Stausberg, M., Van Der Haven, A. and Baffelli, E. 'Religious Minorities: Conceptual Perspectives'. Religious Minorities Online. 2023. DOI: 10.1515/rmo.23389320.

Dr. Angelica Federici
Dr. Maria Chiara Giorda
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • history of religions
  • memory studies
  • urban religion
  • spatial turn

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (7 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 267 KiB  
Article
(In)tangible Cultural Heritage and Religious Minorities: Legal Strategies for the Preservation of Religious Sites
by Thiago Rafael Burckhart
Religions 2025, 16(5), 538; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16050538 - 23 Apr 2025
Abstract
In recent decades, religious spaces have increasingly become subject to heritage processes, encompassing both their tangible dimension and the emerging concept of intangible cultural heritage. This article examines the legal strategies available for protecting the (in)tangible cultural heritage that minority religious communities can [...] Read more.
In recent decades, religious spaces have increasingly become subject to heritage processes, encompassing both their tangible dimension and the emerging concept of intangible cultural heritage. This article examines the legal strategies available for protecting the (in)tangible cultural heritage that minority religious communities can employ to safeguard their religious sites. Focusing on the case of African-derived religions in Brazil, this study argues that the recognition of their (in)tangible heritage serves as a strategic legal instrument for protecting their religious spaces, despite the conflicts that such recognition may provoke. This article contributes to the field of cultural heritage law, engaging with religious studies and exploring the complexities of legally safeguarding minority cultural practices. Full article
18 pages, 2786 KiB  
Article
Religious Places and Cultural Heritage: The Greek Orthodox Church in the Historic Center of Turin
by Caterina Pignotti
Religions 2025, 16(4), 499; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16040499 - 14 Apr 2025
Viewed by 200
Abstract
Religious places represent one of the most significant categories of protected heritage. In Italy, however, places of worship belonging to minority communities often remain inconspicuous and are not legally recognized as part of the nation’s cultural heritage. Consequently, the histories of these communities [...] Read more.
Religious places represent one of the most significant categories of protected heritage. In Italy, however, places of worship belonging to minority communities often remain inconspicuous and are not legally recognized as part of the nation’s cultural heritage. Consequently, the histories of these communities face challenges in securing a space within the collective memory. This contribution, through a spatial approach and an interdisciplinary methodology, highlights the richness of the hidden heritage—both tangible and intangible—of the Greek Orthodox Church of the Nativity of St. John the Baptist in Turin. In particular, this research explores the role of the Greek language, which constitutes a significant element of intangible heritage for the community. Since the 1960s, regular celebrations in the Byzantine rite and the Greek language have been held in the Piedmontese capital. These biritual practices emerged in response to the demands of numerous Greek university students and families who revitalized the Orthodox presence in the territory during those years. In 2000, the Catholic Archdiocese granted the Greek Orthodox community the use of a church in the city’s historic center. This church is interpreted as a shared religious space, having undergone a transformation of identity over time: its Orthodox identity remains architecturally invisible, as the community continues to worship in a former Catholic church. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 7052 KiB  
Article
The Armenian Presence in Vienna: From the Coffeehouse to the Church and Back
by Theodosios Tsivolas and Ani Krikorian
Religions 2025, 16(3), 379; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16030379 - 17 Mar 2025
Viewed by 1631
Abstract
Vienna, one of Europe’s most historically significant cities, has been a focal point for numerous diaspora communities. Among these, the Armenians stand out due to their long-standing history in the city, with records of their presence dating back to the 17th century. This [...] Read more.
Vienna, one of Europe’s most historically significant cities, has been a focal point for numerous diaspora communities. Among these, the Armenians stand out due to their long-standing history in the city, with records of their presence dating back to the 17th century. This paper explores the contributions and experiences of the Armenian community in Vienna, focusing on how Armenian culture has been preserved and adapted via certain social spaces (coffeehouses, libraries, monasteries, and churches) and how these spaces have acted as cultural hubs for the diaspora. By examining the historical, cultural, and social background of these spaces, this study sheds light on how the Armenian community in Vienna navigates its heritage in a modern European context. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 251 KiB  
Article
Symbols of Authority: Obelisks, Hieroglyphs, and Catholic Universalism in Baroque Rome
by Manfredi Merluzzi and Silvia Argurio
Religions 2025, 16(3), 376; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16030376 - 16 Mar 2025
Viewed by 308
Abstract
Through an interdisciplinary study of the work of Jesuit Athanasius Kircher (1602–1680), the authors investigate the relationship between the cultural policies of the Roman Curia, the Jesuit order, religious diversity, and the aesthetic–spatial configuration of Rome during the early modern age. This paper [...] Read more.
Through an interdisciplinary study of the work of Jesuit Athanasius Kircher (1602–1680), the authors investigate the relationship between the cultural policies of the Roman Curia, the Jesuit order, religious diversity, and the aesthetic–spatial configuration of Rome during the early modern age. This paper shares in-depth observations of the recovery of ancient culture and its reworking in a post-reformist Christian age through architectural and spatial elements adopted to endorse the continuity of the ancient past and the Catholic reformistic universalistic aspirations. In this context, Kircher worked to decipher hieroglyphics on obelisks of the Imperial age but from Egyptian times. These defined a specific topography of space as a visual convergence of points: an urban geography of sacral and historical–political value and a connection with the memories of the Roman Empire and the most ancient religions of the ancient times. Full article
13 pages, 3433 KiB  
Article
Romanian Orthodox Heritage in Italy: Blurring Lines Between Different Identities
by Ioan Cozma and Maria Chiara Giorda
Religions 2025, 16(3), 375; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16030375 - 15 Mar 2025
Viewed by 363
Abstract
This research paper explores Romanian Orthodox religious places as vital centers for producing and promoting national identity as well as cultural and religious heritage in Italy. Through the application of a spatial perspective, it addresses the complexities of heritage recognition, questioning what constitutes [...] Read more.
This research paper explores Romanian Orthodox religious places as vital centers for producing and promoting national identity as well as cultural and religious heritage in Italy. Through the application of a spatial perspective, it addresses the complexities of heritage recognition, questioning what constitutes “heritage” for the religious minorities in Italy and highlighting the inadequacies of the current legal frameworks in this context. The paper focuses on the interplay between history and memory, scrutinizing the dialectical relationships that shape polyphonic, collective, and public memories of the Romanian parishes’ national and religious heritage. Moreover, it analyzes how memories, traditions, and national identity influence the perception of religious communities by focusing on constructing a group memory that highlights ethnic identity rather than religious affiliation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2523 KiB  
Article
Reconsidering the Value of Multi-Religious Spaces Based on the Notion of Religious Cultural Heritage: Beyond a Purely Symbolic or Entirely Utilitarian Function
by Valeria Fabretti
Religions 2025, 16(3), 295; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16030295 - 26 Feb 2025
Viewed by 469
Abstract
Sociological research increasingly examines the diversity of cultural and religious resources that various community groups contribute to urban spaces and the public sphere. A key focus within this field is the reinterpretation of shared religious and spiritual spaces as part of the tangible [...] Read more.
Sociological research increasingly examines the diversity of cultural and religious resources that various community groups contribute to urban spaces and the public sphere. A key focus within this field is the reinterpretation of shared religious and spiritual spaces as part of the tangible and intangible religious cultural heritage. Adopting a spatial perspective, this analysis focuses on the specific case of top-down multi-religious places. Through an exploration of representative examples, this article investigates the different typologies of these places—from complexes that host distinct spaces for different faiths or religions to interfaith chapels and prayer and meditation rooms located in non-religious settings—using the framework of religious cultural heritage. The central conceptual bases of this framework—namely, the historical and memorial value, aesthetic considerations, sacredness and social function—are discussed in terms of their partial and complex association with the qualities of these unconventional spaces. This article suggests that the significance of multi-religious places from the perspective of religious cultural heritage is greater when these places do not serve merely a symbolic function or a purely pragmatic one. This article emphasizes the significance of spatial elements shaped by architectural design and construction choices, which can play a crucial role in integrating multi-religious spaces into the collective memory and foster appreciation for unique forms of sacred beauty. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1589 KiB  
Article
The Conversion of Heritage and the Heritage of Conversion: Two Case Studies from Trentino
by Silvia Omenetto and Giuseppe Tateo
Religions 2025, 16(2), 239; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16020239 - 15 Feb 2025
Viewed by 509
Abstract
This article explores two cases of architectural conversion within the TESEO project: the transformation of a Catholic church into an Orthodox church in Trento and the adaptation of a farmstead into a Buddhist temple in the Molin Valley, Trentino. These cases show how [...] Read more.
This article explores two cases of architectural conversion within the TESEO project: the transformation of a Catholic church into an Orthodox church in Trento and the adaptation of a farmstead into a Buddhist temple in the Molin Valley, Trentino. These cases show how conversion involves a negotiation of visual and spatial markers, redefining what is considered “heritage”. The article situates these experiences within broader global trends of growing religious diversity and migration, exploring how such transformations respond to the need for worship spaces for religious minorities. It also reflects on the temporariness of these solutions, often pending the creation of more permanent spaces. In conclusion, the article proposes an open, non-deterministic view of heritage, embracing the fluidity and transformability of contemporary religious spaces. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop