Within and Beyond Ideology - Understanding Islamist Ideas and Concepts in Post-Islamist Groups

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Health/Psychology/Social Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 February 2023) | Viewed by 2460

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Utrecht University, 3584 Utrecht, The Netherlands
Interests: modern Islamic thought; Salafism; Islamism; Islamic theology; jihad; Jordan; Saudi Arabia; Palestinian–Israeli conflict

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The past few decades have witnessed a shift from Islamism and Islamist parties, such as the Muslim Brotherhood and others, towards so-called post-Islamism, an ideological trend that—according to Asef Bayat—couples Islam with freedom and liberty, focus more on rights than on duties and emphasizes plurality rather than uniformity. This has manifested itself in parties such as Hizb al-Wasat in Egypt, the Parti de la justice et du développement (PJD) in Morocco and the Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi (AKP) in Turkey, but also in broader trends such as Rashid al-Ghannushi’s conscious rejection of political Islam in favor of “Muslim democracy” or the reformist ZamZam initiative in Jordan.

What all these post-Islamist parties and initiatives have in common is that they have (perhaps selectively) watered down strict and doctrinaire Islamist positions on issues such as the founding of an Islamic state, the application of Sharia and political participation in states deemed non-Islamic. What is less clear is what exact ideas they have substituted these positions with. Throughout the years, Islamists in the Muslim Brotherhood, Al-Nahda and other organizations have developed a wide-ranging discourse to express their views on Islamist politics, but how have post-Islamists reinterpreted, dismissed or reinforced these ideas to give meaning to their new positions? In other words: what ideological impact does post-Islamism have?

The purpose of this Special Issue is to find answers to this question by focusing on two different developments: first, contributions may concentrate on conceptual changes. To what extent are widely-used concepts among Islamists such as shura (consultation), al-amr bi-l-ma‘ruf wa-l-nahy ‘an al-munkar (commanding right and forbidding wrong) and bay‘a (pledge of fealty) still relevant among post-Islamists? What do concepts such as al-dawla al-madaniyya (the civil state) and al-Ghannushi’s “Muslim democracy” actually mean to the post-Islamist thinkers and activists using them? Second, contributions will be welcomed by authors focusing on broader ideological trends in post-Islamism. To what extent can parties such as the PJD still be called “Islamist”? Have they retained an Islamist ideological toolkit, have they—as some have long suggested they would—developed into socially conservative parties comparable to Christian democrats in European countries or have they become more secular?

By answering such questions, this Special Issue seeks to address the understudied subject of the conceptual and ideological underpinnings of post-Islamism. As such, it strives to contribute to our knowledge of developing ideas among religious organizations and parties in general and to those of post-Islamist ones and their transition from their Islamist predecessors in particular.

Dr. Joas Wagemakers
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • post-Islamism
  • Islamism
  • ideology

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 350 KiB  
Article
Citizenship in the Writings of a Post-Islamist Ex-Muslim Brother: The Case of Ruhayyil Gharayiba
by Joas Wagemakers
Religions 2023, 14(4), 488; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14040488 - 4 Apr 2023
Viewed by 1779
Abstract
The literature on post-Islamism has paid little attention to citizenship and has largely ignored how conceptual reform on this topic is supported by reinterpretations of the sharia. This article addresses this issue by focussing on the Jordanian ex-Muslim Brother Ruhayyil Gharayiba, who has [...] Read more.
The literature on post-Islamism has paid little attention to citizenship and has largely ignored how conceptual reform on this topic is supported by reinterpretations of the sharia. This article addresses this issue by focussing on the Jordanian ex-Muslim Brother Ruhayyil Gharayiba, who has been at the forefront of post-Islamist reform in his country, including with regard to citizenship. Based on an extensive reading of Gharayiba’s own work in Arabic as well as multiple interviews with him, it seeks to answer the following question: to what extent and how has Gharayiba built a conceptual as well as a legal basis for his post-Islamist ideas on citizenship and what does this tell us about the development of post-Islamism in relation to Asef Bayat’s writings on the subject? It shows that Gharayiba is, indeed, a post-Islamist and uses concepts on citizenship similar to those used by Egyptian post-Islamists, but goes further by also providing legal support for his views and pushing beyond the idea of a “civil state with an Islamic authority”. As such, the example of Gharayiba concurs with Bayat’s writings on post-Islamism, showing that continued religiosity can be combined with reform that goes beyond even that of the wasatiyya. Full article
Back to TopTop