sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Open Educational Practices for AI in Education

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Education and Approaches".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (6 March 2024) | Viewed by 3101

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Educational Technology, The Open University (OU), Milton Keynes, UK
Interests: technology systems for learning; theoretical frameworks for learning and innovation; mobile learning; MOOC; OER impact; open education; open textbooks

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK
Interests: teaching and learning; pedagogy and education; technology enhanced learning; education science; artificial intelligence

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Artificial Intelligence entered higher education—and the popular consciousness—emphatically in 2023. Several years after their emergence, generative AI has developed into large language models such as ChatGPT. They can be used to produce text that is relevant to a wide range of pedagogical and administrative tasks. Images (Midjourney, DALL-E, etc.) and videos (Synthesia, Deepbrain, etc.) can now also be easily produced from natural language. This emergence of AI technology into the popular imagination has fuelled speculation on its likely impact on education and training. Many can see (while others dispute) the potential for AIED to reduce the workload of educators and learners by automating repetitive tasks; improve the personalization and contextualization of educational delivery; provide “intelligent” tutoring systems (ITS); and realize the full promise of learning analytics. Concomitantly, there is intense debate about the status of traditional forms of assessment that are dependent on writing composition in a world where an AI can be instructed to write on demand (Holmes & Tuomi, 2022).

The UNESCO 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda calls for the development of sustainable approaches to OER production and use. This, in turn, requires greater efficiency and coordination across the relevant learning technology ecosystems (Otto and Keres, 2022). A human-centered, interdisciplinary approach to AIED is essential for balance and sustainability. There is the potential that this may be achieved by adopting a sociotechnical perspective and embracing open approaches such as transparency and explicability (Tlili & Burgos, 2022; Farrow, 2022). However, current practices in AI require huge amounts of data which are often sourced indiscriminately and without due attention to existing ethical or legal requirements (Heikkilä, 2023).

There is an essential and time-sensitive need to support AI-driven innovation while preserving the integrity, effective operation, and trust of traditional educational systems. For the past decade, the AIED revolutions have been driven by technological companies. This was seen most clearly during the COVID-19 pandemic when commercial organizations moved quickly to become core providers of online learning.  The pandemic acted as a catalyst for online working, training, and education, but also established profit motive and market capture as key priorities. On the demand side, there is huge interest in using AI to facilitate study; however, generative AI also threatens to disrupt core pedagogical practices (such as assessment). Areas where AIED and OEP overlap include: using open algorithms and open data to support smarter repositories and learning platforms; developing AI tools for search, discovery, reuse and sharing of OER; use of algorithms in open learning environments; new forms of pedagogy; ameliorating injustice in education; and regulatory/policy support for “open” AIED.

Many AI services are currently open access, but this is already changing as companies seek a return on investment, threatening a new form of digital divide. Even when AIED providers call themselves ‘open’ there is typically scant commitment to the principles of open practice: OpenAI, the creators of ChatGPT, are not committed to any form of open licensing or open practice. There are also many outstanding ethical questions regarding the consequences of algorithmic bias in AIED; privacy and security of data; and its impact on pedagogical practice and professional development. How should open practitioners respond to AIED in such a way as to ensure that open education makes full use of the potential of AIED, retains its core values, and ensures the future sustainability of open education?

In this Special Issue, we welcome both original research articles and reviews. Research areas may include (but are not limited to) the following topics:

identifying, imagining and realizing open forms of AIED Open AI literacies that combine the technological dimensions of AI with human dimensions (impact on people, ecosystems, sustainability);  inequality of access to AIED: addressing the new ‘digital divide’; strategies for using AI to facilitate working with OER (search & discovery, remix, evaluation, metadata, tracking implementation); explicable AIED (XAIED) and the role of transparency in AI pedagogical and educational technology; AIED as open educational practice; ameliorating algorithmic bias through open data AI, copyright and the commons; and AIED as the new horizon for ‘open washing’.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

References

  1. Holmes, W.; Tuomi, I. State of the art and practice in AI in education. Eur. J. Educ. 2022, 57, 542–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533.
  2. Daniel, O.; Michael, K. Increasing Sustainability in Open Learning: Prospects of a Distributed Learning Ecosystem for Open Educational Resources. Front. Educ. 2022, 7, 866917. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.866917.
  3. Wei, T.; Yang, J. Radical Solutions for Education in a Crisis Context: COVID-19 As an Opportunity for Global Learning, Edited by Daniel Burgos, Ahmed Tlili and Anita Tabacco. EaC 2022, 26, 5.

Dr. Rob Farrow
Dr. Wayne Holmes
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • open educational resources (OER)
  • open educational practices (OEP)
  • artificial intelligence in education (AIED)

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 243 KiB  
Article
Custom-Trained Large Language Models as Open Educational Resources: An Exploratory Research of a Business Management Educational Chatbot in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina
by Nikša Alfirević, Daniela Garbin Praničević and Mirela Mabić
Sustainability 2024, 16(12), 4929; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124929 - 8 Jun 2024
Viewed by 989
Abstract
This paper explores the contribution of custom-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) to developing Open Education Resources (OERs) in higher education. Our empirical analysis is based on the case of a custom LLM specialized for teaching business management in higher education. This custom LLM [...] Read more.
This paper explores the contribution of custom-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) to developing Open Education Resources (OERs) in higher education. Our empirical analysis is based on the case of a custom LLM specialized for teaching business management in higher education. This custom LLM has been conceptualized as a virtual teaching companion, aimed to serve as an OER, and trained using the authors’ licensed educational materials. It has been designed without coding or specialized machine learning tools using the commercially available ChatGPT Plus tool and a third-party Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbot delivery service. This new breed of AI tools has the potential for wide implementation, as they can be designed by faculty using only conventional LLM prompting techniques in plain English. This paper focuses on the opportunities for custom-trained LLMs to create Open Educational Resources (OERs) and democratize academic teaching and learning. Our approach to AI chatbot evaluation is based on a mixed-mode approach, combining a qualitative analysis of expert opinions with a subsequent (quantitative) student survey. We have collected and analyzed responses from four subject experts and 204 business students at the Faculty of Economics, Business and Tourism Split (Croatia) and Faculty of Economics Mostar (Bosnia and Herzegovina). We used thematic analysis in the qualitative segment of our research. In the quantitative segment of empirical research, we used statistical methods and the SPSS 25 software package to analyze student responses to the modified BUS-15 questionnaire. Research results show that students positively evaluate the business management learning chatbot and consider it useful and responsive. However, interviewed experts raised concerns about the adequacy of chatbot answers to complex queries. They suggested that the custom-trained LLM lags behind the generic LLMs (such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and others). These findings suggest that custom LLMs might be useful tools for developing OERs in higher education. However, their training data, conversational capabilities, technical execution, and response speed must be monitored and improved. Since this research presents a novelty in the extant literature on AI in education, it requires further research on custom GPTs in education, including their use in multiple academic disciplines and contexts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Open Educational Practices for AI in Education)
Back to TopTop