sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Risk Management

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Management".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2020) | Viewed by 12792

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
University of Granada
Interests: Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance, Business ethics, Ethical instruction

E-Mail
Guest Editor
University Complutense de Madrid
Interests: Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance, Organizations

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The financial crisis of 2008 showed that financial information did not adequately reveal risks. Users, shareholders, and creditors require more information about risks, and disclosure is moving in this direction. Risk assessment may be different between shareholders and creditors. Risks can be related to social and environmental conflicts, and these can affect long-term sustainability, increase debt cost, and cause financial distress. Otherwise, doing well by doing good in environmental and social issues could reduce debt cost. In this sense, debt markets’ perception of financial risk could be affected by CSR policies.

For creditors, CSR could be considered as a signal of how the firm manages its financial risk. First, CSR activities could generate moral capital or goodwill that minimizes default risk by decreasing debt cost. Second, the reduction of social conflicts or environmental risk favors the long-term sustainability of firms and ensures credit rating (Hsu and Chen, 2015). Today, credit rating agencies and financial institutions are demanded to assess long-term risk (Andrikopoulos et al, 2014). Third, the increase of CSR commitments could be seen by stakeholders as a signal of doing well and improve the relationship between firms and key stakeholders, and this could have an effect on financial performance indicators (Chollet and Sandwidi, 2018). Fourth, CSR policies are conservative, thus decreasing the risk of loss from investments in high-risk projects or underinvestment in low-risk accrual to creditors. Credit decisions take into account financial risk but ESG factors, too. Some major European banks have to justify their credit decisions on the basis of ESG performance, and the cost will be related to the perceived risks.

In this context, CSR commitment could suppose a reduction of financial risk reflected in a decrease of marginal cost of debt, the cost of debt (Jung et al., 2018) or access to debt financing (La Rosa et al. 2018), and negative CSR could increase the cost of financing (Mishra and Modi, 2013).

In addition, the impact of board characteristics such as the presence of women could be considered. Women are more prone to CSR and more risk-averse than men. Their presence may have an impact on reducing financial distress. In addition, CSR assurance could improve the confidence and reliability in CSR policies developed (Maroun, 2018; Sethi et al., 2017). Likewise, the legal or institutional context of the firm can also have an impact on the relationship between CSR and the cost of financing (Benlemlih and Girerd-Potin, 2017).

Suggested topics include:

  • Environmental and social strategies and the characteristics of corporate governance boards and their impact on financial risk;
  • Good governance, environmental, and social practices and financial risk;
  • Impact of positive and negative CSR on financial risk;
  • Impact of CSR in financial distress and solvency situations/
  • CSR assurance and financial risk;
  • Relationship between financial risk and the organization's ability to create value;
  • How CSR relates to the continued availability, quality, and affordability of relevant capital in the short, medium, and long term (cost of debt or marginal cost of debt).

References

Andrikopoulos, A., Samitas, A, and Bekiaris, M (2014) Corporate social responsibility reporting in financial institutions: Evidence from Euronext, Research in International Business and Finance, 32: 27-35

Benlemlih, M, Girerd‐Potin, I. (2017) Corporate social responsibility and firm financial risk reduction: On the moderating role of the legal environment. Journal of Business Financing and Accounting.; 44: 1137– 1166. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12251

Chollet, P, and Sandwidi, B.W. (2018) CSR engagement and financial risk: A virtuous circle? International evidence, Global Finance Journal, 38: 65-81.

Hsu, F. and Chen, Y. (2015), "Is a firm’s financial risk associated with corporate social responsibility?", Management Decision, 53 (9): 2175-2199. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2015-0047

Jung, J., Herbohn, K. & Clarkson, P. (2018) Carbon Risk, Carbon Risk Awareness and the Cost of Debt Financing, Journal of Business Ethics 150: 1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3207-6

La Rosa, F., Liberatore, G., Mazzi, F. and Terzani, S. (2018) The impact of corporate social performance on the cost of debt and access to debt financing for listed European non-financial firms, European Management Journal, 36 (4): 519-529,

Maroun, W. (2018) A Conceptual Model for Understanding Corporate Social Responsibility Assurance Practice. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3909-z

Mishra, S. & Modi, S.B. (2013) Positive and Negative Corporate Social Responsibility, Financial Leverage, and Idiosyncratic Risk, Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2): 431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1526-9

Sethi, S.P., Martell, T.F. & Demir M. (2017), Enhancing the Role and Effectiveness of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Reports: The Missing Element of Content Verification and Integrity Assurance, Journal of Business Ethics 144 (1): 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2862-3.

Prof. Dr. María Victoria López
Prof. Dr. Jesús Mauricio Flórez-Parra
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • positive CSR
  • negative CSR
  • environment performance
  • social performance
  • financial risk
  • CSR assurance
  • board diversity
  • good governance practices
  • cost of debt
  • financing access

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 224 KiB  
Article
Green Social Responsibility and Company Financing Cost-Based on Empirical Studies of Listed Companies in China
by Duan Ji, Yuyu Liu, Lin Zhang, Jingjing An and Wenyan Sun
Sustainability 2020, 12(15), 6238; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156238 - 3 Aug 2020
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3771
Abstract
Taking Chinese A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges from 2007 to 2018 as research samples, this paper studies the relationship between green corporation social responsibility (CSR) and financing cost of Chinese companies by means of moderating effect and multiple regression [...] Read more.
Taking Chinese A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges from 2007 to 2018 as research samples, this paper studies the relationship between green corporation social responsibility (CSR) and financing cost of Chinese companies by means of moderating effect and multiple regression analysis. It is found that, for companies, the better the performance of green social responsibility, the lower the financing cost. However, it is also found that for companies with different pollution degrees and natures of property rights, the financing cost reduction effects due to green social responsibility are quite different. Compared with low-polluting companies, the financing cost reduction effect arisen by green CSR will be weakened for high-polluting companies. Compared with private companies, the financing cost reduction effect from green CSR will also be weakened for state-owned companies. To sum up, the research results of this paper show that there is a significant saving effect on financing cost for companies undertaking green CSR, and companies’ characteristics of pollution degree and property right can regulate the impact of green CSR on financing cost. The conclusion of this paper can encourage companies to take green social responsibility actively and reduce the cost of financing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Risk Management)
20 pages, 369 KiB  
Article
Corporate Social Responsibility and Crowdfunding: The Experience of the Colectual Platform in Empowering Economic and Sustainable Projects
by Jesús Mauricio Flórez-Parra, Gracia Rubio Martín and Carmen Rapallo Serrano
Sustainability 2020, 12(13), 5251; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135251 - 29 Jun 2020
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 4031
Abstract
In recent years, sustainable crowdfunding has been one of the key elements in the search for new sources of financing. This has involved eliminating financial barriers and intermediaries, bringing entrepreneurs’ projects closer to fund providers, and thus instigating changes in traditional investment and [...] Read more.
In recent years, sustainable crowdfunding has been one of the key elements in the search for new sources of financing. This has involved eliminating financial barriers and intermediaries, bringing entrepreneurs’ projects closer to fund providers, and thus instigating changes in traditional investment and profitability parameters. Among these indicators, the sustainable business return and its relationship with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) could be a relevant factor to improve the cost of funding, to explain the return on assets (ROA), and, consequently, impacting on the return on equity (ROE). In this context, this paper takes as a reference 101 projects that are part of Colectual’s lending. We analyze factors such as sustainability—the application of CSR across a social responsibility index; the financial characteristics of the company—liquidity, leverage, and solvency; and the characteristics of the loans related to crowdfunding—amount, maturity, and charge rate of the loan. Our study provides empirical evidence that, besides financial characteristics, the commitment to CSR can improve collective lending and the management of resources, as well as enhance the capital wealth of companies, by improving shareholder profitability or ROE. Investors consider not only financial risk but also sustainability factors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Risk Management)
20 pages, 355 KiB  
Article
Investigation of the Pillars of Sustainability Risk Management as an Extension of Enterprise Risk Management on Palestinian Insurance Firms’ Profitability
by Rami Shaheen, Mehmet Ağa, Husam Rjoub and Ahmad Abualrub
Sustainability 2020, 12(11), 4709; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114709 - 9 Jun 2020
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4100
Abstract
This research paper examined the simultaneous relationship between sustainability risk management (SRM) as an extension of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) and Palestinian insurance firms’ profitability, for the period spanning 2007Q1 to 2018Q4, by applying the panel dynamic (Generalized Method of Moments) GMM model. [...] Read more.
This research paper examined the simultaneous relationship between sustainability risk management (SRM) as an extension of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) and Palestinian insurance firms’ profitability, for the period spanning 2007Q1 to 2018Q4, by applying the panel dynamic (Generalized Method of Moments) GMM model. The literature was expanded by providing a comprehensive understanding of determining the pillars of ERM with the use of the factor analysis principle component method. The findings revealed that the firm’s profitability positively corresponded to ERM1 implementation, which represents “management efficiency”. In contrast, it shows negative correspondence to ERM2 implementation, which represents “control and ownership”. Furthermore, there were slightly negative signs from managing the use of leverage and they were conservative in terms of loss reserves. The challenges of firms’ profitability have negatively corresponded to emerging sustainability risks, such as political stability, that cause premiums written to show weak signs of excessive choice of risk or prices that are not met carefully. Interestingly, there is a positive relationship in the interaction between ERM2 implementation during the crisis period on insurance firms’ profitability. There is a robust causal relationship from ERM to the profitability (either positive or negative). The reverse causality is also significant but to a lesser extent. Thus, the study recommends alignment more coherent with the implication of ERM as holistic risk according to the market characteristic towards the environmental perils leads to sustainable development and its segments to maintain the longer term of survival in the firms’ performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Risk Management)
Back to TopTop