sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Frontiers in Ecosystem Services: Planning the Changing Urban Landscapes

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Urban and Rural Development".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2023) | Viewed by 5827

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICAR), University of Catania | UNICT, 95124 Catania, CT, Italy
Interests: sustainable spatial planning; urban risks assessment and management; climate change mitigation and adaptation; spatial analyses and GIS application; environmental policy; green infrastructure planning; flood risk management planning
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website1 Website2
Guest Editor
Laboratorio per la Pianificazione Territoriale e Ambientale (LAPTA), Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Catania, Viale S. Sofia 64, 95123 Catania, Italy
Interests: urban planning and sustainability; environmental management; environmental impact assessment; climate change; spatial analyses; ecosystem services
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Human health and well-being in urban environments are unquestionably dependent on the functioning of ecosystems, on the services they provide that are necessary for supplying material and non-material factors to people (Butler, C. D., and W. Oluoch-Kosura. 2006), and on the ways they are managed for urban dwellers (Haines-Young and Potschin, 2009).

Understanding the nexus among urban ecosystems’ functioning, landscape patterns’ changes, and socio-demographic trends is crucial to achieving the global sustainable development agenda in the upcoming decades.

Urbanization is a very complex process that features landscapes with densification, sprawling, and shrinkage patterns and has various impacts on land and the environment (Haase et al., 2014).

The population growth in the last two hundred years has been focused on urban areas with increasing demand for resources and energy, as well as loss of biodiversity (McDonald et al., 2020). However, even if all cities continue to attract large numbers of residents as expected, especially due to strong migratory waves and in megacities of the global South, stagnation or even depopulation have been unveiled as phenomena of declining shrinking cities in many urban contexts in the Northern Hemisphere (Lima and Eischeid, 2017).

Consequently, the complexity of urbanization dynamics requires exploring the multifaceted ecological and environmental implications across changing urban landscapes.

The latter reflect emerging development crises, which include the unsolved one induced by climate change and the very recent one caused by the breakout of the COVID-19 pandemic. These crises challenge our ability to advance a new generation of development policies that put nature at the center, prompting an urgent call for green infrastructure planning to protect human physical and mental health (Pamukcu-Albers et al., 2021).

Although urban ecosystems have been at the core of a well-established research agenda for many years, a body of both theoretical perspectives and experimental approaches to ecosystem-based urban governance, policies, and planning practices must grow in order to continuously inform the research covering the diversity of urban landscapes, which have witnessed an unprecedented convergence of crises. In particular, ecosystem services (ES), an approach that is a cornerstone of urban sustainability, is widely impeded by the narrow use of information on it at the planning level of decision making (Geneletti, 2011), institutional and social empowerment failures (Kronenberg, 2015), and science–policy–governance gaps, and the concept of ES is misaligned with existing planning frameworks and tools (Kremer et al., 2016). ES still needs to be further explored as the most important path to face urban disruption and underused or abandoned spaces. Additionally, the context of the Global South’s urban ecosystems is often poorly understood, with a paucity of research, primarily because most available information is from the Global North (Escobedo, 2021). This also poses great problems in terms of environmental justice, which are exacerbated by a lack of access to primary resources during COVID-19 (Patel et al., 2020).

This Special Issue aims to cover the latest frontiers in managing ecosystem services to support real-life decision-making processes at the levels of spatial planning, urban policymaking, and urban landscape design, in light of current challenges faced by cities worldwide.

We encourage researchers and practitioners to submit original research articles, case studies, and critical essays on topics including, but not limited to, the following:

  • New interdisciplinary and integrated analytical tools, spatially explicit methods, experimental and modeling approaches to investigate and address questions involving both ecosystem services and human well-being in urban areas;
  • Heuristic perspectives toward cross-boundary approaches and scaling of environmental problems and policies with a focus on urban landscapes;
  • Advanced use of indicators of urban landscape sustainability policymaking to overcome limitations of comparative research and support field-based study, incorporating knowledge of the variability, thresholds, drivers, and cross-scale linkages of ecosystems’ functions and services relevant to the well-being of urban dwellers;
  • Planning regimes’ strengths and weaknesses to realize opportunities in urban green infrastructure and ecosystem services in developing countries;
  • Rethinking ecosystem services and trade-off for shrinking urban landscapes;
  • Collaboration and policy co-production with communities in the use of spatial planning tools and urban design practice to promote sustainable neighborhoods;
  • Green infrastructure planning “value” and its impact on health, social, economic, and environmental outcomes, including new framework and methods for monitoring the implementation of planning and policy tools at a local scale;
  • New frontiers in managing ecosystem services to increase urban climate and pandemic resilience according to different geographical and social contexts;
  • The nexus among urban ecosystem services users, land property regimes, and planning/administrative systems.

This Special Issue welcomes outcomes of the dissemination and exploitation activites from the Erasmus+ project URGENT: Urban Resilience and Adaptation for India and Mongolia: curricula, capacity, ICT and stakeholder collaboration to support green & blue infrastructure and nature-based solutions 619050-EPP-1-2020-1-DE-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP.

References

Butler, C. D., W. Oluoch-Kosura. (2006). Linking future ecosystem services and future human well-being. Ecology and Society 11(1): 30. [online]

Escobedo F.J. (2021). Understanding Urban Regulating Ecosystem Services in the Global South. In: Shackleton C.M., Cilliers S.S., Davoren E., du Toit M.J. (eds) Urban Ecology in the Global South. Cities and Nature. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67650-6_9

Geneletti,D. (2011). Reasons and options for integrating ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment of spatial planning. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 7, 3, 143–149

Haase, D., Frantzeskaki, N. & Elmqvist, T. (2014). Ecosystem Services in Urban Landscapes: Practical Applications and Governance Implications. AMBIO 43, 407–412. doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0503-1

Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M. (2009). The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In Raffaelli, D. & C. Frid (eds.): Ecosystem Ecology: a new synthesis. BES Ecological Reviews Series, CUP, Cambridge

Kremer, P., Hamstead, Z., Haase, D., McPhearson, T., Frantzeskaki, N., Andersson, E., ... & Elmqvist, T. (2016). Key insights for the future of urban ecosystem services research. Ecology and Society, 21(2).

Kronenberg, J. (2015). Why not to green a city? Institutional barriers to preserving urban ecosystem services. Ecosystem services, 12, 218-227.

Lima, M. F., & Eischeid, M. R. (2017). Shrinking cities: rethinking landscape in depopulating urban contexts. Landscape Research, 42, 7, doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1372167

McDonald, R. I., Mansur, A. V., Ascensão, F., Crossman, K., Elmqvist, T., Gonzalez, A., ... & Ziter, C. (2020). Research gaps in knowledge of the impact of urban growth on biodiversity. Nature Sustainability, 3(1), 16-24.

Pamukcu-Albers, P., Ugolini, F., La Rosa, D., Grădinaru, S. R., Azevedo, J. C., & Wu, J. (2021). Building green infrastructure to enhance urban resilience to climate change and pandemics. Landscape Ecology volume 36, 665–673

Patel A. (2020). Preventing COVID‐19 Amid Public Health and Urban Planning Failures in Slums of Indian Cities, World Medical & Health Policy, 12(3), 266-273

Dr. Viviana Pappalardo
Dr. Daniele La Rosa
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • spatial planning
  • urban ecosystem services
  • urban sustainability

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

22 pages, 11174 KiB  
Article
Spatial Analysis of Flood Exposure and Vulnerability for Planning More Equal Mitigation Actions
by Viviana Pappalardo and Daniele La Rosa
Sustainability 2023, 15(10), 7957; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107957 - 12 May 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1958
Abstract
The issue of spatial equity of Nature-Based Solutions in cities generally concerns the spatial distribution of their benefits to local residents and other city users. In the context of flood risk management, planners are challenged to identify effective mitigation and adaptation measures that [...] Read more.
The issue of spatial equity of Nature-Based Solutions in cities generally concerns the spatial distribution of their benefits to local residents and other city users. In the context of flood risk management, planners are challenged to identify effective mitigation and adaptation measures that can generate benefits to the higher number of people and, more specifically, to people with highest levels of exposure and vulnerability. To address these issues, an essential step is to identify the geography of needs for mitigation, intended as prior areas in which to locate measures for flood risk mitigation. This study combines geospatial layers of multiple dimensions of exposure and vulnerability to flooding and identifies prior areas suitable for design scenarios for mitigation of flooding risk, for a regional case study located in Sicily. The results show patterns of exposure and vulnerability that vary according to locally relevant physical and social urban dimensions. Based on these results, proposals for mitigation actions are advanced with the overall objective of generating equal benefits to the most vulnerable exposed social subjects. Moreover, this study argues about the particular implications of implementing stormwater green infrastructure planning for equal beneficial distribution of the potentially achievable risk reduction. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

17 pages, 2405 KiB  
Review
Urban Ecosystem Services in South America: A Systematic Review
by Catalina B. Muñoz-Pacheco and Nélida R. Villaseñor
Sustainability 2022, 14(17), 10751; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710751 - 29 Aug 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2575
Abstract
Nature within cities provides benefits for people known as urban ecosystem services. An assessment of urban ecosystem services is growing in South America, a biodiverse and highly urbanized region. To synthesize this growing body of knowledge in South America, we performed a systematic [...] Read more.
Nature within cities provides benefits for people known as urban ecosystem services. An assessment of urban ecosystem services is growing in South America, a biodiverse and highly urbanized region. To synthesize this growing body of knowledge in South America, we performed a systematic review identifying patterns in the literature and knowledge gaps. Our review shows that Brazil, Chile, and Colombia contribute the greatest number of studies. More than 80% of the studies were published in the last five years, revealing this as an emerging research topic in the region. More than half of the studies had an environmental perspective and focused on services provided by green spaces. Nearly all studies involved regulating services, followed by cultural services. We found clear knowledge gaps, including a paucity of assessments on supporting and provisioning services, as well as the lack of studies in several countries, evaluations concerning land cover other than parks, and large-scale assessments. Comparing ecosystem services in different planning scenarios is urgently needed to make informed decisions, aid nature conservation, and provide ecosystem services for all urban dwellers. This knowledge will contribute to achieving sustainable cities and equitable access to ecosystem services in South America. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop