sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Fostering Inclusivity in Rural Economic Development

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2020) | Viewed by 11899

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Countryside and Community Research Institute (CCRI), University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL50 2QF, UK
Interests: rural economy and society; inclusive employment and development; local economic development; social value; social psychology; health and wellbeing; community health; community growing

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Inclusive economic development is widely recognised as development which is significantly widespread for the majority of a population or society to benefit. This approach implies a need to consider the wider impacts of development on society and the social value generated by such development. It also pays particular heed to inequality, relative poverty, the intergenerational nature of development and the needs of future generations. In a rural context where territorial, bottom–up approaches have tended to dominate, this notion of inclusivity necessarily extends itself to the collaborative processes involved in the design and delivery of development policy. In addition, it has particular relevance for social innovation and wellbeing in the implementation, impact and evaluation of rural development projects and programmes, which are often rooted in the active participation of local people. However, the concept of inclusivity as it relates to rural economic development remains poorly defined and the methodological innovations required to deliver it largely under-developed. This Special Issue provides an opportunity to address these shortcomings and to inform the debate at a crucial juncture in rural development policy. Conceptually framed articles are sought which speak to one or more of the following:

(1) Explore theoretical concepts and derive emergent paradigms around inclusivity as it relates to rural economic development;

(2) Develop relevant or innovative methodologies;

(3) Evaluate current policy and/or programme delivery;

(4) Report empirical evidence on any aspect of inclusivity in rural economic development, including policy analysis.

Papers selected for this Special Issue will be subject to a rigorous peer review procedure with the aim of rapid and wide dissemination of research results, developments, and applications.

Prof. Dr. Paul Courtney
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • inclusive development
  • rural economy
  • rural society
  • social innovation
  • sustainable development
  • whole society
  • social value
  • public goods
  • territorial development
  • circular economy

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

25 pages, 1106 KiB  
Article
Evaluating Innovation in European Rural Development Programmes: Application of the Social Return on Investment (SROI) Method
by Paul Courtney and John Powell
Sustainability 2020, 12(7), 2657; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072657 - 27 Mar 2020
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 7657
Abstract
The quest for innovation lies at the heart of European rural development policy and is integral to the Europe 2020 strategy. While social innovation has become a cornerstone of increased competitiveness and the rural situation legitimizes public intervention to encourage innovation, the challenges [...] Read more.
The quest for innovation lies at the heart of European rural development policy and is integral to the Europe 2020 strategy. While social innovation has become a cornerstone of increased competitiveness and the rural situation legitimizes public intervention to encourage innovation, the challenges of its effective evaluation are compounded by the higher ‘failure’ rate implied by many traditional performance measures. Social Return on Investment (SROI) is employed to assess the social innovation outcomes arising from implementation of Axes 1 and 3 of the 2007-13 Rural Development Programme for England (RDPE). Analysis of primary data gathered through structured face-to-face interviews from a weighted sample of 196 beneficiaries reveal that social innovation outcomes generate a total of £170.02 million of benefits from Axis 1 support measures, compared to £238.1 million of benefits generated from innovation outcomes from Axis 3 measures. Benefits are generated through four social innovation outcome categories: individual, operational, relational, and system; and range from changes in attitudes and behaviour to institutional change and new ways of structuring social relations. The paper calls for more comprehensive evaluation approaches that can capture, and value, the multiple benefits arising from social innovation, and further bespoke applications of SROI to help develop and legitimise innovation indicators that will enable stronger linkages back into the policy process. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fostering Inclusivity in Rural Economic Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 5109 KiB  
Article
The Complex Pathway towards Farm-Level Sustainable Intensification: An Exploratory Network Analysis of Stakeholders’ Knowledge and Perception
by Evgenia Micha, Owen Fenton, Karen Daly, Gabriella Kakonyi, Golnaz Ezzati, Thomas Moloney and Steven Thornton
Sustainability 2020, 12(7), 2578; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072578 - 25 Mar 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3784
Abstract
Farm-level sustainable intensification of agriculture (SIA) has become an important concept to ensuring food security while minimising negative externalities. However, progress towards its achievement is often constrained by the different perceptions and goals of various stakeholders that affect farm management decisions. This study [...] Read more.
Farm-level sustainable intensification of agriculture (SIA) has become an important concept to ensuring food security while minimising negative externalities. However, progress towards its achievement is often constrained by the different perceptions and goals of various stakeholders that affect farm management decisions. This study examines farm-level SIA as a dynamic system with interactive components that are determined by the interests of the stakeholders involved. A systems thinking approach was used to identify and describe the pathways towards farm-level SIA across the three main pillars of sustainability. An explanatory network analysis of fuzzy cognitive maps (FCMs) that were collectively created by representative groups of farmers, farm advisors and policy makers was performed. The study shows that SIA is a complex dynamic system, affected by cognitive beliefs and particular knowledge within stakeholder groups. The study concludes that, although farm-level SIA is a complex process, common goals can be identified in collective decision making. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fostering Inclusivity in Rural Economic Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop