sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Risk Analysis, Emergency Management and Resilience in Disasters

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Social Ecology and Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2023) | Viewed by 2618

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Interests: emergency management; risk governance

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Interests: emergency management; risk governance

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Recent disasters, such as catastrophic earthquakes, COVID-19 and so on, have consistently demonstrated the need to cope with expected and unexpected disruptions – a property often referred to as resilience (Boin et al., 2010; Shakou et al., 2019). That is, disasters pose severe challenges to affected communities and individuals in preparing for, making sense of, and responding to adverse events: disasters are unpredictable, usually propagate severe consequences, entail risks and time pressure, and deplete available resources, all of which render established emergency plans ineffective (Perry, 2007).

To address this gap, many valuable researches have emerged to enhance knowledge regarding resilience of socio-technical systems in which human operators and technical tools jointly adapt to and cope with complexity of unanticipated events (Hollnagel and Woods, 2005; Hollnagel et al., 2006). Up to now, various definitions of resilience have been proposed in the literature. Woods (2006) defined resilience as a system’s capability to handle disruptions that fall outside a designed performance envelope, emphasizing adaptations to unanticipated situations (2006, p. 21). Later, Hollnagel (2011) proposed a refined definition of resilience as the system’s inherent ability to adjust its functioning before, during, and after changes and disturbances.

Undoubtedly, researches based on perspectives of resilience has hitherto contributed to addressing emergency management challenges and identifying new capabilities in complex socio-technical systems, but commensurate efforts to examine resilience in various scenarios or domains are still limited. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the essential strength, stability, and capacity to retain certain capabilities throughout the course of disasters, and to recuperate as quickly and as efficiently as possible during the post-disaster recovery phase.

In this Special Issue, original research articles and reviews are welcome. Research areas may include (but not limited to) the following: Resilience for Disaster Management, Sustainability and Resilience in the area of Risk Analysis, Disaster Resilience and Urban/Community Sustainability.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Reference

  1. Boin, A.; McConnell, A. Preparing for Critical Infrastructure Breakdowns: The Limits of Crisis Management and the Need for Resilience. J. Contingencies Crisis Manag. 2007, 15, 50–59, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2007.00504.x.
  2. Hollnagel, E., Woods, D.D., Joint Cognitive Systems: Foundations of Cognitive Systems Engineering. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, US, 2005
  3. Hollnagel, E., Woods, D.D., Leveson, N., Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts. Ashgate Publishing: Aldershot, UK, 2006.
  4. Hollnagel, E., Prologue: the scope of resilience engineering. In Resilience Engineering in Practice: A Guidebook, Hollnagel, E., Paries, J., Woods, D.D., Wreathall, J., Eds.; Ashgate Publishing: Surrey, UK, pp. 20-39, 2011.
  5. Perry, R.W., What is a disaster? In Handbook of Disaster Research, Rodriguez, H., Quarantelli, E., Dynes, R., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, US, pp. 1–15, 2007.
  6. Shakou, L.M.; Wybo, J.-L.; Reniers, G.; Boustras, G. Developing an innovative framework for enhancing the resilience of critical infrastructure to climate change. Saf. Sci. 2019, 118, 364–378, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.019.
  7. Woods, D.D., Essential characteristics of resilience. In Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts, Hollnagel, E., Woods, D.D., Leveson, N., Eds.; Ashgate Publishing: Aldershot, UK, pp. 21–34, 2006.

Prof. Dr. Xuesong Guo
Dr. Jia Shi
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • risk analysis
  • emergency management
  • resilience
  • disaster management

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

19 pages, 6294 KiB  
Article
Community Resilience Assessment and Identification of Barriers in the Context of Population Aging: A Case Study of Changchun City, China
by Wutao Zhao, Jianguo Wang, Yuanhao Xu, Shengbo Chen, Jiawang Zhang, Siqi Tang and Guojian Wang
Sustainability 2023, 15(9), 7185; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097185 - 26 Apr 2023
Viewed by 1743
Abstract
As a susceptible demographic, elderly individuals are more prone to risks during sudden disasters. With the exacerbation of aging, new challenges arise for urban disaster reduction and prevention. To address this, the key is to establish a community-scale resilience assessment framework based on [...] Read more.
As a susceptible demographic, elderly individuals are more prone to risks during sudden disasters. With the exacerbation of aging, new challenges arise for urban disaster reduction and prevention. To address this, the key is to establish a community-scale resilience assessment framework based on the aging background and to summarize factors that influence the resilience level of communities. This approach is a crucial step towards seeking urban disaster prevention and reduction from the bottom up, and serves as an important link to enhance the capacity of urban disaster reduction. This paper explores community resilience evaluation indicators under the background of aging, builds a community resilience evaluation index system based on the Pressure–State–Response, uses the entropy weight method to weigh the indicators, and carries out a resilience evaluation of 507 communities in the main urban area of Changchun. The empirical results indicate significant spatial differentiation of community resilience in the main urban area of Changchun. Moreover, the regional development is unbalanced, showing a spatial distribution pattern of weakness in the middle and strength in the periphery. The ring road network highlights the difference between the new and old urban areas. The high contribution indexes of community resilience in the main urban area of Changchun were concentrated on disaster relief materials input, community self-rescue ability, and disaster cognition ability. Finally, strategies to improve community resilience are proposed from the perspectives of stress, state, and response, emphasizing community residents’ participation, conducting disaster prevention and reduction training, and improving community response-ability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Risk Analysis, Emergency Management and Resilience in Disasters)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop