sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Navigating the Evolving Sustainability Landscape in Healthcare

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (10 July 2023) | Viewed by 14885

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Business, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
Interests: business analytics; risk management; machine learning in finance; sustainability and energy finance

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Business, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
Interests: decision analysis; health informatics; network modeling; simulations and operations management models

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The coronavirus pandemic demonstrated that there is still a continuing need to improve health and care services in terms of accessibility and outcomes (Khatana and Groeneveld, 2020). Despite significant investments by governments and healthcare organizations, many initiatives fail to sustain and do not produce long term benefits (Coles et al., 2017; Stirman et al., 2012).

In the current climate of rising demand for healthcare services, changing priorities, and shortage of resources, there is a need to realize how sustainability can be attained (Punnakitikashem and Hallinger, 2020). However, despite recognition of this challenge and research conducted in this area (e.g., Braithwaite et al., 2017; Crespo-Gonzalez et al., 2017; De Rosis and Nuti, 2018; Chambers et al., 2013; Lennox et al., 2018), relatively little progress was made in supporting the long-term impact of improvement efforts (Lennox et al., 2017). In fact, this understudied area has been identified as one of the most significant translational research problems (Shelton et al., 2018).

The lack of evidence-based consensus on how to define sustainability in healthcare is also contributing to this conundrum, leading to a debate on what qualifies as sustained improvement in healthcare (Moore et al., 2017). Traditionally, sustainability in this domain has been viewed as an ‘outcome’, expressed in terms of well-being, patient satisfaction, etc. (Stirman et al., 2012). In recent years, a never-ending continuous striving for improvement has also been recognized as a potential definition of sustainability (Moore et al., 2017; Saviano et al., 2018). This conceptualization of sustainability as a ‘process’ rather than merely an ‘outcome’ integrates notions of continuous development, learning, and adaptation. It also allows sustainability to be viewed as a change process and a component in a complex adaptive system responding to the needs and goals of the organization (Shigayeva and Coker, 2015). Some researchers in this area evaluate sustainability in healthcare by examining corporate social responsibility and various environmental factors, such as waste, water, carbon footprint, and pollution in the design and management of healthcare facilities (e.g., Daú et al., 2019; Senay and Landrigan, 2018). Sustainability from a clinical perspective means allocating available resources appropriately (both human and material resources) and considering the health and well-being of healthcare personnel (Hamouche, 2020; López-Cabarcos et al., 2020).

For this Special Issue, we are interested in research that investigates sustainability approaches, as well as develops a sustainability knowledge base. The Special Issue will examine different sustainability aspects to support healthcare organizations and researchers to better understand the various perspectives, applications, and constructs within approaches guiding healthcare sustainability initiatives. We are looking for research that can benefit both practitioners and academicians.

Suggested Topics for Submissions:

We welcome experimental and theoretical research on various sustainability aspects. Research may employ a myriad of research design methods, including, but not limited to, multivariate regression analysis, machine learning, in-depth case studies, system change approach or policy-oriented research.

Areas of interest include, but are certainly not limited to:

  • Promoting human well-being and public health;
  • Patient satisfaction;
  • The healthcare employee safety;
  • Continuous improvement;
  • Corporate social responsibility;
  • Promoting responsible use of natural resources;
  • Green practices in healthcare;
  • Waste disposal and cost;
  • Emerging technologies and innovative models of care;
  • Ecological impact of healthcare;
  • Equipment efficiency and recyclability;
  • The impact of COVID-19 on sustainability efforts;
  • Carbon footprint of the health sector;
  • Blockchain in the healthcare ecosystem;
  • Sustainable healthcare performance evaluation;
  • Ethical dimensions of sustainable healthcare;
  • Sustainability for healthcare through digital technologies;
  • Sustainability in design and management of healthcare facilities;

References

  1. Braithwaite, J., Testa, L., Lamprell, G., Herkes, J., Ludlow, K., McPherson, E., Campbell, M. and Holt, J., 2017. Built to last? The sustainability of health system improvements, interventions and change strategies: a study protocol for a systematic review. BMJ open, 7(11), p.e018568.
  2. Chambers, D.A., Glasgow, R.E. and Stange, K.C., 2013. The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implementation Science, 8(1), pp.1-11.
  3. Coles, E., Wells, M., Maxwell, M., Harris, F.M., Anderson, J., Gray, N.M., Milner, G. and MacGillivray, S., 2017. The influence of contextual factors on healthcare quality improvement initiatives: what works, for whom and in what setting? Protocol for a realist review. Systematic reviews, 6(1), pp.1-10.
  4. Crespo-Gonzalez, C., Garcia-Cardenas, V. and Benrimoj, S.I., 2017. The next phase in professional services research: From implementation to sustainability. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 13(5), pp.896-901.
  5. Daú, G., Scavarda, A., Scavarda, L.F. and Portugal, V.J.T., 2019. The healthcare sustainable supply chain 4.0: The circular economy transition conceptual framework with the corporate social responsibility mirror. Sustainability, 11(12), p.3259.
  6. De Rosis, S. and Nuti, S., 2018. Public strategies for improving eHealth integration and long‐term sustainability in public health care systems: Findings from an Italian case study. The International journal of health planning and management, 33(1), pp.e131-e152.
  7. Hamouche, S., 2020. COVID-19 and employees’ mental health: stressors, moderators and agenda for organizational actions. Emerald Open Research, 2.
  8. Khatana, S.A.M. and Groeneveld, P.W., 2020. Health disparities and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the USA. Journal of general internal medicine, 35, pp.2431-2432.
  9. Lennox, L., Maher, L. and Reed, J., 2018. Navigating the sustainability landscape: a systematic review of sustainability approaches in healthcare. Implementation Science, 13(1), pp.1-17.
  10. Lennox, L., Doyle, C., Reed, J.E. and Bell, D., 2017. What makes a sustainability tool valuable, practical and useful in real-world healthcare practice? A mixed-methods study on the development of the Long Term Success Tool in Northwest London. BMJ open, 7(9), p.e014417.
  11. López-Cabarcos, M., López-Carballeira, A. and Ferro-Soto, C., 2020. New ways of working and public healthcare professionals’ well-being: The response to face the covid-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 12(19), p.8087.
  12. Moore, J.E., Mascarenhas, A., Bain, J. and Straus, S.E., 2017. Developing a comprehensive definition of sustainability. Implementation Science, 12(1), pp.1-8.
  13. Punnakitikashem, P. and Hallinger, P., 2020. Bibliometric review of the knowledge base on healthcare management for sustainability, 1994–2018. Sustainability, 12(1), p.205.
  14. Saviano, M., Bassano, C., Piciocchi, P., Di Nauta, P. and Lettieri, M., 2018. Monitoring viability and sustainability in healthcare organizations. Sustainability, 10(10), p.3548.
  15. Senay, E. and Landrigan, P.J., 2018. Assessment of environmental sustainability and corporate social responsibility reporting by large health care organizations. JAMA network open, 1(4), pp.e180975-e180975.
  16. Shelton, R.C., Cooper, B.R. and Stirman, S.W., 2018. The sustainability of evidence-based interventions and practices in public health and health care. Annual review of public health, 39, pp.55-76.
  17. Shigayeva, A. and Coker, R.J., 2015. Communicable disease control programmes and health systems: an analytical approach to sustainability. Health Policy and Planning, 30(3), pp.368-385.
  18. Stirman, S.W., Kimberly, J., Cook, N., Calloway, A., Castro, F. and Charns, M., 2012. The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implementation science, 7(1), pp.1-19.

Dr. Germán G. Creamer
Dr. Tal Ben-Zvi
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • green healthcare
  • sustainable healthcare
  • ESG investment
  • blockchain in healthcare
  • machine learning in healthcare
  • healthcare carbon footprints
  • COVID-19 on sustainability
  • sustainability of healthcare facilities

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

24 pages, 537 KiB  
Article
Healthcare Sustainability: Hospitalization Rate Forecasting with Transfer Learning and Location-Aware News Analysis
by Jing Chen, Germán G. Creamer, Yue Ning and Tal Ben-Zvi
Sustainability 2023, 15(22), 15840; https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215840 - 10 Nov 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1755
Abstract
Monitoring and forecasting hospitalization rates are of essential significance to public health systems in understanding and managing overall healthcare deliveries and strategizing long-term sustainability. Early-stage prediction of hospitalization rates is crucial to meet the medical needs of numerous patients during emerging epidemic diseases [...] Read more.
Monitoring and forecasting hospitalization rates are of essential significance to public health systems in understanding and managing overall healthcare deliveries and strategizing long-term sustainability. Early-stage prediction of hospitalization rates is crucial to meet the medical needs of numerous patients during emerging epidemic diseases such as COVID-19. Nevertheless, this is a challenging task due to insufficient data and experience. In addition, relevant existing work neglects or fails to exploit the extensive contribution of external factors such as news, policies, and geolocations. In this paper, we demonstrate the significant relationship between hospitalization rates and COVID-19 infection cases. We then adapt a transfer learning architecture with dynamic location-aware sentiment and semantic analysis (TLSS) to a new application scenario: hospitalization rate prediction during COVID-19. This architecture learns and transfers general transmission patterns of existing epidemic diseases to predict hospitalization rates during COVID-19. We combine the learned knowledge with time series features and news sentiment and semantic features in a dynamic propagation process. We conduct extensive experiments to compare the proposed approach with several state-of-the-art machine learning methods with different lead times of ground truth. Our results show that TLSS exhibits outstanding predictive performance for hospitalization rates. Thus, it provides advanced artificial intelligence (AI) techniques for supporting decision-making in healthcare sustainability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Navigating the Evolving Sustainability Landscape in Healthcare)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 1758 KiB  
Article
Healthcare Waste and Sustainability: Implications for a Circular Economy
by Abrar Mahjoob, Yousef Alfadhli and Vincent Omachonu
Sustainability 2023, 15(10), 7788; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107788 - 10 May 2023
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 5873
Abstract
The field of healthcare waste systems is an emerging research field with new methodologies being developed to reinforce sustainability. Medical treatments are becoming more sophisticated and in demand due to increasing incidences of chronic disease. Healthcare is also becoming widely available worldwide. Healthcare [...] Read more.
The field of healthcare waste systems is an emerging research field with new methodologies being developed to reinforce sustainability. Medical treatments are becoming more sophisticated and in demand due to increasing incidences of chronic disease. Healthcare is also becoming widely available worldwide. Healthcare waste disposal includes multiple disposal methods including incineration, landfilling, and chemical treatments. These rudimentary methods and their increased prevalence present their own problems that negatively impact both the environment and public health. As a result, there is a global call for healthcare waste systems to transition from a linear to a circular economy (CE). The CE philosophy is employed in other waste management industries. There are limited studies, however, that assess the challenges to CE implementation, particularly in the United States. This research presents the challenges to the implementation of a CE in healthcare waste management systems. The challenges were determined by an extensive literature review. Three experts from the industry verified and provided additional context to the challenges through meetings. The challenges were grouped into seven categories: supply chain management, regulations and policies, industry, organizations internal, technology and operational, economic, and funding, and social. A decision-making trial and evaluation (DEMATEL) was used to rank the challenges and illustrate interrelationships between the challenges. The most significant challenge was found to be a lack of governmental legislation on CE healthcare policies, followed by a lack of a realistic CE business model and lack of consumer interest in the environment. The research will provide context to further developments into adopting CE practices. The limitations and future scope of the research are presented. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Navigating the Evolving Sustainability Landscape in Healthcare)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 5803 KiB  
Article
Testing of a Multiple Criteria Assessment Tool for Healthcare Facilities Quality and Sustainability: The Case of German Hospitals
by Andrea Brambilla, Jan Marvin Apel, Inga Schmidt-Ross, Maddalena Buffoli and Stefano Capolongo
Sustainability 2022, 14(24), 16742; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416742 - 14 Dec 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3168
Abstract
Background: Hospital facilities are an essential part of healthcare systems, making the assessment of their quality and sustainability pivotal. Most existing evaluation tools lack a holistic and validated approach, while predominantly excluding the built environment. The Italian hospital evaluation tool SustHealth v2 addresses [...] Read more.
Background: Hospital facilities are an essential part of healthcare systems, making the assessment of their quality and sustainability pivotal. Most existing evaluation tools lack a holistic and validated approach, while predominantly excluding the built environment. The Italian hospital evaluation tool SustHealth v2 addresses the shortcoming of existing applications through its structured and more integrated approach; there is the need for further testing it. Methods: The study aims to test for the first time in an international case study the multicriteria assessment tool previously developed and validated. The tool assesses social, environmental, and organisational qualities in hospitals with an online survey containing 199 closed questions sent to German hospitals. A total of 14 full replies have been collected and the resulting data analysed through descriptive statistics and heat maps identifying patterns in ownership and size. Results: Within the sample, higher scores are reported in Social Quality, while lower in Environmental and Organisational Quality. Respondents performed well in the sustainability dimensions of health promotion, waste management, and patient safety. Improvements can be achieved in energy management, facility management, and technological innovation criteria. Private hospitals slightly outperform both public and non-profit clinics. The findings presented in this study suggest a non-linear relationship between sustainability and hospital size since the highest scores were obtained by either small or large facilities. Conclusion: The study highlighted strengths and limitation of SustHealth v2. Further testing and comparison are encouraged in different context. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Navigating the Evolving Sustainability Landscape in Healthcare)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

14 pages, 1212 KiB  
Review
Are Sustainable Health Workforces Possible? Issues and a Possible Remedy
by Gareth H Rees, Rosemary James, Levan Samadashvili and Cris Scotter
Sustainability 2023, 15(4), 3596; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043596 - 15 Feb 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2539
Abstract
The 2020–2022 period of the global COVID-19 pandemic exposed the fact that many countries health systems had inadequate health workforce availability. This is despite sustainable health workforces being critical to health service and healthcare delivery, an acknowledgement that drove the significant investment and [...] Read more.
The 2020–2022 period of the global COVID-19 pandemic exposed the fact that many countries health systems had inadequate health workforce availability. This is despite sustainable health workforces being critical to health service and healthcare delivery, an acknowledgement that drove the significant investment and focus on health workforce development over the previous two decades. As such, this review article discusses health workforce governance and planning, notes its weaknesses, and identifies some of the barriers to the implementation of health workforce policy making and planning and the achievement of sustainable health workforces. Important is the recognition that health workforce planning is long-term in nature, while health workforce decision-making processes are dominated by political processes that have much shorter time frames. The article concludes by offering the approach of backcasting to overcome this dichotomy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Navigating the Evolving Sustainability Landscape in Healthcare)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop