Next Article in Journal
The Critical Importance of Spatial and Temporal Scales in Designing and Interpreting Immune Cell Migration Assays
Previous Article in Journal
Increased LGR6 Expression Sustains Long-Term Wnt Activation and Acquisition of Senescence in Epithelial Progenitors in Chronic Lung Diseases
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neuron-Glia-Immune Triad and Cortico-Limbic System in Pathology of Pain
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 10
Issue 12
10.3390/cells10123440
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) Administration Sex-Specifically Affects Blood Insulin Levels and Liver Steatosis in Obese Ay Mice

by
Elena Makarova
1,*,
Antonina Kazantseva
1,
Anastasia Dubinina
1,
Elena Denisova
1,
Tatiana Jakovleva
1,
Natalia Balybina
1,
Nataliya Bgatova
1,
Konstantin Baranov
2 and
Nadezhda Bazhan
1
1
The Laboratory of Physiological Genetics, The Institute of Cytology and Genetics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
2
The Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2021, 10(12), 3440; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10123440
Submission received: 16 November 2021 / Revised: 1 December 2021 / Accepted: 3 December 2021 / Published: 7 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sex Differences in Health and Disease: Mechanisms and Outcomes)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
FGF21 is a promising candidate for treating obesity, diabetes, and NAFLD; however, some of its pharmacological effects are sex-specific in mice with the Ay mutation that evokes melanocortin receptor 4 blockade, obesity, and hepatosteatosis. This suggests that the ability of FGF21 to correct melanocortin obesity may depend on sex. This study compares FGF21 action on food intake, locomotor activity, gene expression, metabolic characteristics, and liver state in obese Ay males and females. Ay mice were administered FGF21 for seven days, and metabolic parameters and gene expression in different tissues were assessed. Placebo-treated females were more obese than males and had lower levels of blood insulin and liver triglycerides, and higher expression of genes for insulin signaling in the liver, white adipose tissue (WAT) and muscles, and pro-inflammatory cytokines in the liver. FGF21 administration did not affect body weight, and increased food intake, locomotor activity, expression of Fgf21 and Ucp1 in brown fat and genes related to lipolysis and insulin action in WAT regardless of sex; however, it decreased hyperinsulinemia and hepatic lipid accumulation and increased muscle expression of Cpt1 and Irs1 only in males. Thus, FGF21’s beneficial effects on metabolic disorders associated with melanocortin obesity are more pronounced in males.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) is an endocrine messenger that regulates multiple aspects of energy homeostasis [1,2]. It is synthesized and secreted into the bloodstream mainly by the liver in response to various metabolic stresses and coordinates the response from adipose tissues, liver, and muscle to restore metabolic homeostasis [3]. Currently, FGF21 is considered an attractive therapeutic target to treat obesity and obesity-associated metabolic disorders, including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [1,4,5]. It was shown in preclinical models that administration of FGF21 or its mimetics and analogs reduces body weight, blood glucose levels, improves blood lipid profiles, increases insulin sensitivity [6,7,8], and protects from fatty liver disease [9,10] in obese animals. Human clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of some FGF21-based analogs in the reduction of body weight [8] and treatment of dyslipidemia, NAFLD, and type 2 diabetes mellitus [11,12].
The therapeutic effects of FGF21 were observed in mice with both diet-induced and genetic obesity caused by the absence of leptin (ob/ob) or its functional receptor (db/db) [6,7,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. The ability of FGF21 to improve glucose and lipid metabolism in animal models of genetic obesity opens up prospects for its use for the correction of comorbidities associated with genetic forms of obesity in humans.
In humans, the most common forms of monogenic obesity are associated with mutations that disrupt the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) signaling in the hypothalamus [23,24]. MC4R neurons regulate food intake, reward system, energy expenditure [25,26], glucose, and lipid metabolism [27,28]. Loss of MC4R function is accompanied by hyperphagia, development of obesity and insulin resistance [29,30], cardiovascular abnormalities [31], and fatty liver [32] in mice and humans [24,33]. The modern approach for treating melanocortin obesity is designing MC4R agonists [34]; however, MC4R agonists are only effective when upstream, but not downstream, MC4R signaling is impaired, and, in addition, they can cause side effects [34]. FGF21-based medications could be used as an alternative therapy or as part of a complex therapy to correct melanocortin obesity, but the pharmacological effect of FGF21 has hardly been studied in the models of melanocortin obesity.
Mice with the mutation Lethal yellow at the agouti locus (Ay) represent a model of MC4R blockade [35]. The mutation results in ectopic expression of the agouti protein [36], which has a high affinity for MC4R [37]. Ectopic expression of agouti protein in the hypothalamus leads to blockade of MC4R and loss of MC4R function. Phenotypically, mice with the Ay mutation are similar to MC4R knockout mice [29,30]. Ay mice are hyperphagic and develop obesity, insulin resistance [38], and fatty liver [39] with age, so, Ay mice may be used as a model of melanocortin obesity to investigate the pharmacological effects of FGF21. Previously, we investigated the effect of FGF21 administration on obese Ay mice on body weight, food intake, blood hormone and metabolic characteristics, and expression of some genes in the different tissues and found sex-specific responses to this administration. In this experiment, FGF21-treated Ay males had lower body weight (BW) and blood insulin concentrations than placebo-treated males, while FGF21-treated females had higher food intake (FI) and liver weight compared to females that received placebo [40]. These data indicate that FGF21 may differently affect the regulation of energy intake and expenditure, insulin sensitivity, and liver state in obese Ay male and female mice and promote lipid accumulation in Ay female livers. The aim of the present study is to compare the effects of exogenous FGF21 on energy intake, locomotor activity, metabolic characteristics, liver state, and expression of genes related to the regulation of energy homeostasis and glucose and lipid metabolism in obese Ay males and females. Histological analysis of liver structure was made, and expression of marker genes for fibrosis, inflammation, and oxidative stress was measured to investigate FGF21 influence on the liver’s state.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Experimental Design

C57BL/6J-Ay mice were bred in the SPF vivarium of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics. The mice were housed individually under a 13 h/11 h light/dark regime (light from 01:30 to 14:30) at an ambient temperature of 22 °C–24 °C. The mice were provided ad libitum access to water and standard pelleted Ssniff Rat/Mouse Maintenance diet received from ssniff Spezialdiäten GmbH Ferdinand-Gabriel-Weg D-59494 Soest, Germany. At the age of 35–40 weeks and body weight of 45–50 g, mice were randomly divided into control (administration of PBS) and experimental (administration of FGF21) groups. There were 7 males and 6 females in the control groups and 7 males and 6 females in the experimental groups. The mice were placed in PhenoMaster cages (TSE Systems GmbH, Berlin, Germany) and acclimated to the new cages for 8 days. Mouse fat and lean masses were assessed at the end of the period of acclimatization using EchoMRI-700 magnetic resonance analyzer (EchoMRI LLC, Houston, TX, USA). After acclimatization, recombinant mouse FGF21 (1 mg per 1 kg) dissolved in PBS or PBS alone was administered subcutaneously at the end of the light period (12:00–13:00) for 7 days. The day after the last injection, fat and lean masses were measured again, and then the animals were sacrificed by decapitation. Samples of trunk blood were collected; liver and interscapular brown adipose tissue (iBAT) were weighed. For histological analysis, the lobe of the liver was removed and fixed using a buffered 10% formalin solution (pH 7.4). The samples of the liver, visceral WAT in the paragonadal region, iBAT, and skeletal muscle were collected and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen to evaluate gene expression. BW was measured daily, and intake of standard food and locomotor activity were monitored throughout the experimental period.

2.2. Histological Analysis of the Liver

Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded liver tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Light-optical studies were performed using an Axioskop 2 plus microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany). Digital micrographs of liver sections (n = 50 for each group) were analyzed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Hepatocytes were divided into 3 groups according to the degree of lipid accumulation: (1) Hepatocytes with large lipid inclusions in which the cytoplasm was filled with a large fat droplet that displaced the nucleus to the periphery of the cell; (2) hepatocytes with tightly adjacent small lipid inclusions, which were visualized as separate droplets, without displacement of the nucleus [41]; (3) hepatocytes with small-sized lipid droplets, which were located at a distance from each other. The volume densities of hepatocytes with small, medium, and large lipid inclusions were determined at ×100 magnification. The volume densities of macrophages and apoptotic bodies in the liver parenchyma were counted at ×400 magnification. A closed test system consisting of 1276 points was used for morphometry.

2.3. Plasma Assays and Triglyceride and Glycogen Measurements

Concentrations of insulin, leptin, and adiponectin were measured using Rat/Mouse Insulin ELISA Kit, Mouse Leptin ELISA Kit (EMD Millipore, St. Charles, MO, USA), and Mouse Adiponectin ELISA Kit (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), respectively. Concentrations of glucose, triglycerides, and cholesterol were measured colorimetrically using Fluitest GLU, Fluitest TG, and Fluitest CHOL (Analyticon® Biotechnologies AG Am Mühlenberg 10, 35,104 Lichtenfels, Germany), respectively. Concentrations of free fatty acids were measured using NEFA FS DiaSys kits (DiaSys Diagnostic Systems GmbH, Holzheim, Germany).
Liver triglycerides were measured as described by Zhao et al. [42]; liver glycogen was measured by the method of Roehrig and Allred [43].

2.4. Expression and Purification of Mouse FGF21

Expression and purification of mouse recombinant FGF21 were performed as previously described [22].

2.5. Relative Quantitation Real-Time PCR

Total RNA was isolated from tissue samples using ExtractRNA kit (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using Moloney murine leukemia virus (MMLV) reverse transcriptase (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia) and oligo(dT) as a primer. TaqMan gene expression assays (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA), listed in Table 1, were used for relative quantitative real-time PCR with β-actin (Actb) as an endogenous control for the samples of muscles, liver, and hypothalamus, and B2m as an endogenous control for the samples of WAT and BAT. Sequence amplification and fluorescence detection were performed on an Applied Biosystems ViiA 7 Real-Time PCR System. Relative quantification was performed by the comparative threshold cycle (CT) method.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Each result is presented as an arithmetic mean ± SE for the sample size (i.e., number of mice) indicated. Repeated measures ANOVA with factors “sex” (male, female), “experiment” (PBS, FGF21 administration), and “days of experiment” (7) were used to analyze FGF21 effects on food intake (FI) and body weight (BW) loss. Three-way ANOVA with factors “sex”, “experiment”, and “day of experiment” (1–7) was used to analyze FGF21 effects on locomotor activity. Two-way ANOVA with factors “sex” and “experiment” was used to analyze FGF21 effects on weights of body, liver, fat, and iBAT, blood parameters, and gene expression with multiple comparisons using the post hoc Newman–Keuls test. The comparisons between single parameters were performed with a two-tailed Student’s t-test and nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test. Results were considered significant at p < 0.05. The STATISTICA 6 software package (StatSoft, TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) was used for analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Exogenous FGF21 on Body Weight, Fat Mass, Food Intake, Locomotor Activity, and Hormonal and Metabolic Parameters in Obese Ay Male and Female Mice

Administration of PBS or FGF21 resulted in a slight decrease in BW in both males and females (Repeated measures ANOVA, p < 0.001, days of the experiment, Figure 1). In males, FGF21 had no effect on weight loss. In females, weight loss was lower in FGF21-treated mice compared to PBS-treated mice on days 4 and 5 of administration (Figure 1). However, these differences disappeared on day 6 and day 7 of administration.
In PBS-treated mice, FI initially decreased, possibly due to reaction to stress and then restored to normal by the end of the experiment. FGF21 administration abolished this stress anorexia from the first day of administration in females and from the third day of administration in males (Figure 1). FGF21-treated mice consumed more food than PBS-treated ones (Repeated measures ANOVA, p < 0.01, factor “experimental treatment”). There were no sex differences in FI in PBS-treated mice, and FGF21-treated females tended to consume more chow than FGF21-treated males (p < 0.078, Repeated measures ANOVA).
Male and female mice differed in locomotor activity. Males ran a greater distance than females during both the whole day and the dark phase of the day (p < 0.001, 3-way ANOVA, Figure 2). FGF21 administration increased locomotor activity in both males and females (p < 0.05, 3-way ANOVA, Figure 2). Therefore, FGF21 administration did not affect BW and increased locomotor activity and FI in obese Ay mice regardless of sex.
Although males and females did not differ in BW, females had significantly less lean mass and significantly more fat (approximately 25–30%) in the body than males (Table 2). There were no sex differences in the weight of iBAT. FGF21 administration did not affect the amount of WAT and iBAT in either males or females.
There were no sex differences in the plasma concentrations of glucose, triglycerides, and free fatty acids (FFA) in mice that received PBS. FGF21 administration did not affect glucose and FFA levels and tended to increase triglyceride levels, the latter being more pronounced in males (Table 3). Two-way ANOVA revealed significant interactions between factors “sex” and “experimental treatment” in the influence on plasma levels of insulin and leptin and interaction at the level of tendency for cholesterol. In PBS-treated mice, the insulin level was significantly higher in males.
FGF21 administration reduced the plasma concentration of insulin only in males. In PBS-treated mice, the mean value of plasma leptin concentration was higher in males, and FGF21 administration differently affected leptin levels in males and females; it decreased in males and increased in females. An additional comparison of plasma cholesterol concentrations between PBS-treated males and females and between PBS- and FGF21-treated males using the Student’s test revealed significant differences. Cholesterol concentrations in females were lower than in males (p < 0.05), and administration of FGF21 lowered cholesterol concentrations in males (p < 0.05). FGF21 administration abolished sex differences in the blood levels of insulin and cholesterol observed in PBS-treated mice. Plasma concentrations of adiponectin were higher in PBS-treated females than in PBS-treated males, and FGF21 administration did not affect this parameter. The results indicate that exogenous FGF21 had a beneficial effect on hormonal and biochemical blood parameters only in males, while females were unresponsive to its action.

3.2. Effect of Exogenous FGF21 on Liver Fat Content

Histological analysis of the liver structure in mice treated with PBS revealed the signs of steatosis in both males and females. Hepatocytes with large lipid droplets that displaced the nucleus to the cell periphery (Figure 3A(a)), hepatocytes with tightly adjoining small lipid inclusions which were visualized as separate droplets without displacement of the nucleus (Figure 3A(b)), and hepatocytes with small-sized lipid droplets which were located at a distance from each other (Figure 3A(c)) were observed in the livers of both males and females. Accumulation of lipids in the nuclei of hepatocytes (Figure 3A(d)), the presence of hepatocytes with signs of apoptosis—heterochromatized nuclei, the presence of apoptotic bodies in the liver parenchyma (Figure 3A(e)), and infiltration of macrophages (Figure 3A(f)) were also observed in the liver of mice of both sexes. However, males had a higher proportion of hepatocytes with medium-sized lipid droplets and a lower proportion of hepatocytes with small-sized ones in their liver than females (Figure 3F).
In PBS-treated mice, the absolute and relative weight of the liver, as well as the content of fat in the liver, were significantly higher in males than in females (Table 1, Figure 3B(a,b),C,D), and hepatic glycogen stores were the same (data are not shown). These data, combined with the results for the hepatocyte lipid accumulation, indicate that males had more pronounced liver steatosis than females in the PBS treated groups. At the same time, females had more macrophages and apoptotic bodies (Figure 3E,G).
FGF21 administration did not affect glycogen content, reduced the absolute (by 20%) and relative weight of the liver, and also halved the fat content in the liver in males and had no effect on these values in females (Figure 3C,D). As a result, the sex differences in these parameters, observed in PBS-treated mice, disappeared after FGF21 administration. Administration of FGF21 was accompanied by sex-specific structural changes in the liver. In males, in contrast to females, FGF21 administration significantly decreased the number of hepatocytes with large lipid droplets (Figure 3B(a,c)), while in females, but not in males, this administration decreased the proportion of hepatocytes with small lipid droplets and increased the proportion of hepatocytes with medium lipid droplets (Figure 3B(b,d),F). FGF21 administration increased the number of apoptotic bodies in both males and females, but this increase was higher in males (more than 4 times) than in females (about 1.6 times) (Figure 3G). The data indicate that FGF21 administration improved liver health only in males.

3.3. Effect of Exogenous FGF21 on Gene Expression in Liver, Muscle, White and Brown Adipose Tissues, and Hypothalamus

In the liver, the mRNA levels of the following genes were assessed: Fgf21, Ppara, Pgc1, Cpt1a, Pdk4 (activation of fatty acid oxidation); Acaca, Acacb, Fasn (lipogenesis); Mttp, Apob (lipid release from the liver with lipoproteins); Gck, Pklr (glycolysis); G6pc, Pck1 (gluconeogenesis); Insr, Irs1, Irs2, Slc2a2, Igf1, Stat5 (signal transduction of insulin and growth hormone, glucose transport); Hif1a, Nfe2l2, Cd68, Tnfa, Il1b, Ccl3 (markers of oxidative stress and inflammation), and Tgf-b1, Timp (markers of fibrosis). There were no sex differences in the mRNA levels of genes related to lipogenesis, glycolysis, and gluconeogenesis in PBS-treated mice, and FGF21 administration did not affect the expression of these genes (Figure 4).
Regardless of FGF21 treatment, mRNA levels of genes related to fatty acid oxidation (Fgf21, Cpt1a, Pdk4), lipid transport (Apob), insulin and growth hormone signaling (Insr, Irs1, Irs2, Igf1), and pro-inflammatory activity of macrophages (Cd68, Tnfa, Il1b, Ccl3) were higher in females. FGF21 administration did not have a pronounced effect on the expression of any studied genes in males. In females, it stimulated gene expression of transforming growth factor beta-1 (Tgf-b1), which activates fibrogenesis, and inhibited gene expression of antioxidant nuclear factor Nfe2l2. In addition, a significant interaction between factors “sex” and “experiment” was detected for mRNA level of inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (Timp1) that is upregulated during hepatic fibrogenesis.
Sex differences in gene expression were observed in adipose tissues of PBS-treated mice. In iBAT, mRNA levels of Fgf21, co-receptor for FGF21 receptor Klb, and FGF21 target genes (Pparg and Cpt1) were higher in females than in males (Figure 5).
In visceral WAT, mRNA levels of Klb and genes related to lipid metabolism (Lipe, Slc2a4) were also higher in females (Figure 6). Gene expression response to FGF21 administration was similar in adipose tissues of males and females. In iBAT, FGF21 administration increased the expression of Ucp1 and Fgf21 in both males and females. In visceral WAT, FGF21 administration had no effect on genes involved in fatty acid oxidation and thermogenesis in mitochondria and robustly increased the expression of genes involved in the regulation of fat metabolism (Ppara), genes encoding lipolysis enzymes ATGL (Pnpla2) and HSL (Lipe), and genes related to insulin actions (Insr, Slc2a4) in mice of both sexes. The only exception was the expression of the gene encoding KLB; exogenous FGF21 increased it in males and decreased it in females.
Sex differences in gene expression and gene expression response to FGF21 administration were observed in muscles (Figure 7). In PBS-treated mice, muscle mRNA levels of Ucp3 and Irs1 were higher in females. FGF21 administration increased mRNA levels of Cpt1 and Irs1 and at the level of tendency (p = 0.06, nonparametric Mann—Whitney U test) mRNA levels of Insr and Slc2a4 only in males.
In the hypothalamus, sex differences were observed in the expression of the orexin gene Hcrt, which was higher in males regardless of FGF21 treatment. FGF21 administration had no effect on the expression of the studied genes, with the exception of the gene for leptin receptor (Figure 8). FGF21 administration increased the level of Lepr mRNA in males and decreased it in females.

4. Discussion

In this work, we evaluated the effectiveness of FGF21 for the correction of disorders caused by a decrease in MC4R activity. The relevance of this study is due to the fact that mutational disorders of MC4R signaling are the most common form of genetic obesity in humans, but the effect of FGF21 on metabolic disorders caused by a decrease in MC4R functions has been little studied. Loss of function of MC4R in the hypothalamus results in obesity, hyperphagia [29], reduction of sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) tone, and decrease in energy expenditure [44,45], hyperinsulinemia, and increased triglycerides accumulation in the liver [46]. Ay mice were used as a model of a decrease in MC4R functions due to permanent blockade of receptors by the agouti protein [47].
The ability of FGF21 to reduce body weight in obese individuals [2] is one of its most important characteristics. Unlike other models of monogenic or diet-induced obesity and our previous results [40], exogenous FGF21 did not cause weight loss in Ay mice of both sexes. FGF21 did not affect body weight and fat mass in Ay mice, possibly due to the simultaneous increase in energy intake and expenditure. The same effect was observed in FGF21-treated New Zealand obese (NZO) mice, which were a model for polygenetic obesity and type 2 diabetes [48]. Ay mice injected with FGF21 consumed more food than mice injected with PBS because PBS-treated mice reduced food intake under the influence of injections, while FGF21-treated mice did not. We have previously shown that Ay mutation exaggerated stress anorexia in male mice [49], and our results suggest that FGF21 counteracts stress-induced anorexia in Ay mice. It is not known whether FGF21 will increase food intake in the absence of stress; this issue requires further study. Perhaps, more prolonged and sparing exposure to FGF21 (chronic administration of FGF21 with a minipump, administration of FGF21-mimetics with prolonged action) would have reduced weight since its administration increased energy expenditure. This issue also requires further study.
The modes of FGF21 action on energy expenditure in Ay mice are possibly specific for this model. FGF21 administration increased locomotor activity and significantly increased expression of the FGF21 gene in the iBAT in both males and females. FGF21 increases thermogenesis by acting on the central nervous system to activate sympathetic action [50]. In turn, adrenergic stimulation increases the expression of FGF21 in adipocytes, and FGF21 of adipocyte origin promotes activation of thermogenesis via autocrine action [51]. It is shown in the mouse model with deletion of UCP1-expressing adipocytes [52] that the mechanisms of FGF21’s influence on energy expenditure depend on the functional activity of BAT; FGF21 activates Ucp1 expression and thermogenesis in the presence of Ucp1 expressing adipocytes, and it increased physical activity in the absence of Ucp1 expressing adipocytes. Inhibition of SNA activity underlies the decreased energy expenditure in mice with loss of functions of MC4R [45,53]. Possibly, the activating effect of FGF21 on locomotor activity in Ay mice and significant elevation of Fgf21 expression in BAT were associated with the inhibitory effect of Ay mutation on the BAT activity.
Apparently, the administration of FGF21 increased energy expenditure in WAT in both Ay males and females since it was accompanied by an increase in the expression of the genes for ATGL (Pnpla2), HSL (Lipe), and Ppara in mice of both sexes. The ATGL-PPARα pathway is involved in the metabolic activity of WAT, and lipolysis activation is accompanied by PPARa activation, increased mitochondrial and peroxisome activity, and an increase in energy expenditure [54].
Although the ability of FGF21 to reduce body weight was compromised in Ay mice, FGF21 administration significantly decreased hyperinsulinemia and improved the liver state, but only in males. This suggests that FGF21 improves insulin sensitivity and lipid metabolism independently from weight loss in Ay male mice. This result is in line with results obtained in mice with diet-induced obesity, NZO mice, and Siberian hamsters [48,55,56].
FGF21 reverses liver steatosis by acting on hepatic lipid metabolism and glucose uptake [10], inducing thermogenesis in BAT and WAT [57], improving insulin sensitivity in muscles and liver [58], and increasing glucose uptake by adipose tissues [48,56]. In Ay mice, FGF21 increased iBAT expression of Ucp1 and Fgf21, and expression of genes for the insulin receptor (Insr) and insulin-dependent glucose transporter Glut4 (Slc2a4) in WAT in both males and females, indicating enhancing of thermogenesis in BAT and glucose uptake in WAT. However, these changes were associated with improved steatosis only in males. FGF21 administration was ineffective to improve hyperinsulinemia and steatosis in Ay females.
Obese Ay male and female mice differed significantly in metabolic parameters and liver status initially. Ay females were more resistant to the development of disorders caused by the inhibition of MC4R activity. Although Ay females exhibited a greater degree of obesity than males in the present experiment, their metabolic disorders were less pronounced, as was also seen in MC4R knockout mice [44]. This higher resistance to obesity-associated disturbances was not associated with energy intake or physical activity, as females did not differ from males in FI and had lower locomotor activity than males, although female mice, including mice of the congenic line C57Bl/6J, usually have greater locomotor activity [59]. Sex differences in locomotor activity were possibly related to sex differences in the expression of Hcrt in the hypothalamus (it was higher in males), as the product of the gene orexin increases locomotor activity [60].
Initially, in females, signs of liver steatosis were less pronounced. The relative weight of the liver and the fat content in the liver in females were lower than in males, and triglycerides were deposited mainly in the form of small droplets, while in males, larger droplets were more prevalent. The lower fat content in female as compared to male livers may be due to greater triglyceride secretion from the liver (females had higher expression of the gene encoding apolipoprotein B), the higher triglyceride deposition in WAT, or more intensive oxidation in BAT (higher expression of Cpt1 gene) and muscles (higher expression of Ucp3 gene). Insulin resistance is a key factor in NAFLD pathogenesis [61,62], and better liver condition in females was associated with less pronounced insulin resistance. Females had lower blood insulin levels and higher mRNA levels of genes for insulin signal transduction in the liver (Insr, Irs1, Irs2), abdominal fat (Slc2a4), and muscles (Irs1). In obese Ay females, estrogens and elevated blood levels of adiponectin may serve to maintain insulin sensitivity and lower lipid accumulation in the liver. Both estradiol and adiponectin increase insulin sensitivity and decrease lipid contents in the liver [63,64]. The effects of estradiol and adiponectin are realized directly on the periphery [65,66,67] or through central mechanisms, including the melanocortin system [68,69]. Since hypothalamic melanocortin regulation is disrupted in Ay mice, sex differences in the severity of hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance may be associated mainly with the peripheral action of these hormones. It was shown in obese Ay males that peripheral but not central administration of adiponectin decreased blood glucose and insulin levels and increased sympathetic nervous activity in BAT and expression of Ucp1 in BAT and Ucp3 in muscles [70].
FGF21 also may contribute to sex differences in initial metabolic status in Ay mice. FGF21 was shown to increase insulin sensitivity through direct actions on WAT and BAT [55]. Fgf21 expression in the liver and BAT and Klb expression in WAT and BAT were higher in females than in males, which indicates a greater sensitivity of female adipose tissues to the action of FGF21.
Since insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis were less pronounced in females initially, it can be assumed that sex-specific factors (effects of estrogens, adiponectin, FGF21, as discussed above) masked the effect of exogenous FGF21. In females, administration of FGF21 had no effect on gene expression in muscles, while in males, it increased the expression of Cpt1, which indicates activation of fatty acid oxidation and insulin signaling genes, which indicates an increase in insulin sensitivity. Skeletal muscle is the major site of glucose uptake in the postprandial state, and insulin resistance in skeletal muscles is shown to be the primary defect in type 2 diabetes [71]. Therefore, in male mice, improvement in skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity may significantly improve whole-body insulin action, which can lead to decreased insulin levels in their blood. According to Camporez et al. [58,72], the mechanisms of the effect of estradiol in ovariectomized female mice and FGF21 in obese male mice on insulin sensitivity are the same. Both FGF21 and estradiol decrease hepatocellular and myocellular diacylglycerol content and reduce protein kinase Cϵ activation in the liver and protein kinase Cθ in skeletal muscle. The lack of the effect of FGF21 on muscle insulin sensitivity and liver triglyceride content in females may be associated with crosstalk between estradiol and FGF21 in their actions in muscles and liver.
FGF21 sex-specifically affected sensitivity to leptin. It lowered blood leptin and increased hypothalamic expression of the gene for leptin receptor (Lepr) in males and had opposite effects in females. Leptin helps to reduce the level of insulin in the blood through the central nervous system [73]. Ay mice develop obesity-associated hyperleptinemia and leptin resistance [74]; partial restoration of leptin sensitivity in FGF21-treated male mice may contribute to lowering blood insulin levels in males.
Our results do not allow us to draw an unambiguous conclusion regarding the effect of exogenous FGF21 on liver health in Ay females. In males, the administration of FGF21 was accompanied by the elimination of hepatocytes with large fat droplets, possibly as a result of apoptosis, because the number of apoptotic bodies increased significantly in males. In females, the number of hepatocytes with large droplets remained the same, but the number of hepatocytes with medium droplets increased, which may be a sign of further development of NAFLD. In addition, FGF21 administration sex-specifically affected the liver expression of genes related to inflammation and fibrosis. Initially, Ay females differed from males by a large number of macrophages, increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Cd68, Tnfa, Il1b, Cd3), a large number of apoptotic bodies, and increased expression of gene for NFE2L2, a transcription factor that triggers the expression of the genes of proteins with antioxidant and cytoprotective properties [75]. Since PBS-treated females did not show signs of pronounced apoptosis, inflammation, and fibrosis, which is a mark of the progression of NAFLD [76], the attraction of macrophages to the liver and their activation in Ay females can be considered an adaptive process aimed at recovering the structure and function of the liver. FGF21 administration increased expression of the transforming growth factor gene Tgfb1, which promotes the development of fibrosis [77], decreased in males and increased in females gene expression of inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (Timp1) that is upregulated during hepatic fibrogenesis [78], and decreased gene expression of the antioxidant nuclear factor, erythroid derived 2, like 2 (Nfe2l2). Further research is needed to determine if these changes in female liver are adaptive or indicative of progression to NAFLD and fibrosis.
Previously, preclinical studies of FGF21 action on liver steatosis were performed only in males. Our results clearly indicate that its action on liver health may depend on sex, and FGF21 administration outcomes may not benefit females. A mice computational model has shown that livers of males and females are metabolically distinct organs [79]. Sex differences exist in the prevalence, risk factors, fibrosis, and clinical outcomes of NAFLD [80], and our results highlight the need for preclinical testing of FGF21 actions on liver steatosis, not only in males, but also in females. It is not known if FGF21 is unable to improve liver health in only Ay females or also in females with other models of steatosis. It is necessary to research the effect of FGF21 on hepatic steatosis in females with other forms of obesity. To answer the question of why FGF21 is not effective for treating steatosis in Ay females, it is necessary to study the molecular mechanisms of interaction between FGF21 and sex steroids and their effect on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in the liver.
A principal limitation of our study is that FGF21 actions may be different depending on species and cannot be directly translated to humans. In addition, we used mice with ectopic expression of agouti protein as a model of melanocortin obesity; however, this ectopic expression may result in blockade of melanocortin receptors, including MC1R and MC2R, not only in the brain, but also in the periphery, introducing some phenotypic features specific to this model.

5. Conclusions

FGF21 administration has male-specific therapeutic effect in obese Ay mice. Although this administration does not decrease hyperphagia, it reduces hyperinsulinemia and improves liver health in Ay male mice. This improvement is associated with signs of increasing of muscle insulin sensitivity and hypothalamic leptin sensitivity only in males. These data indicate that FGF21 is a potent candidate to correct metabolic abnormalities associated with melanocortin obesity in male individuals. In placebo-treated groups, Ay females differ from males in less pronounced disorders in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism and accumulate less lipids in the liver. Ay females are sensitive to FGF21 action, but FGF21 administration does not affect blood insulin level and does not improve liver state in them. Since preclinical studies of FGF21 actions on liver steatosis were previously conducted only in males, more studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of FGF21 in improving glucose metabolism and NAFLD in obese females.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.B. (Nadezhda Bazhan) and E.M.; methodology, E.M. and A.K.; validation, T.J. and A.K.; formal analysis, E.M. and N.B. (Nataliya Bgatova); investigation, A.K., A.D., E.D. and N.B. (Natalia Balybina); resources, K.B.; data curation, N.B. (Nadezhda Bazhan); writing—original draft preparation, E.M.; writing—review and editing, N.B. (Nadezhda Bazhan) and T.J.; visualization, E.M.; supervision, N.B. (Nadezhda Bazhan); project administration, E.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation, Grant number 17-15-01036.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Independent Ethics Committee of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Division, Russian Academy of Sciences (protocol number 47; 23 February 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The studies are implemented using the equipment of the Center for Genetic Resources of Laboratory Animals at ICG SB RAS. We thank Nikita Khotskin and Anna Khotskina, researchers of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics, for technical assistance in working with PhenoMaster system.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Talukdar, S.; Kharitonenkov, A. FGF19 and FGF21: In NASH we trust. Mol. Metab. 2021, 46, 101152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Flippo, K.H.; Potthoff, M.J. Metabolic Messengers: FGF21. Nat. Metab. 2021, 3, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Martínez-Garza, Ú.; Torres-Oteros, D.; Yarritu-Gallego, A.; Marrero, P.F.; Haro, D.; Relat, J. Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 and the Adaptive Response to Nutritional Challenges. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Lewis, J.E.; Ebling, F.J.; Samms, R.J.; Tsintzas, K. Going Back to the Biology of FGF21: New Insights. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 30, 491–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zarei, M.; Pizarro-Delgado, J.; Barroso, E.; Palomer, X.; Vázquez-Carrera, M. Targeting FGF21 for the Treatment of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2020, 41, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kharitonenkov, A.; Shiyanova, T.L.; Koester, A.; Ford, A.M.; Micanovic, R.; Galbreath, E.; Sandusky, G.E.; Hammond, L.J.; Moyers, J.S.; Owens, R.A.; et al. FGF-21 as a novel metabolic regulator. J. Clin. Investig. 2005, 115, 1627–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Coskun, T.; Bina, H.A.; Schneider, M.A.; Dunbar, J.D.; Hu, C.C.; Chen, Y.; Moller, D.E.; Kharitonenkov, A. Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 Corrects Obesity in Mice. Endocrinology 2008, 149, 6018–6027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Baruch, A.; Wong, C.; Chinn, L.W.; Vaze, A.; Sonoda, J.; Gelzleichter, T.; Chen, S.; Lewin-Koh, N.; Morrow, L.; Dheerendra, S.; et al. Antibody-mediated activation of the FGFR1/Klothoβ complex corrects metabolic dysfunction and alters food preference in obese humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 28992–29000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, J.; Lloyd, D.J.; Hale, C.; Stanislaus, S.; Chen, M.; Sivits, G.; Vonderfecht, S.; Hecht, R.; Li, Y.-S.; Lindberg, R.A.; et al. Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 Reverses Hepatic Steatosis, Increases Energy Expenditure, and Improves Insulin Sensitivity in Diet-Induced Obese Mice. Diabetes 2008, 58, 250–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Keinicke, H.; Sun, G.; Mentzel, C.; Fredholm, M.; John, L.M.; Andersen, B.; Raun, K.; Kjaergaard, M. FGF21 regulates hepatic metabolic pathways to improve steatosis and inflammation. Endocr. Connect. 2020, 9, 755–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Geng, L.; Lam, K.S.L.; Xu, A. The therapeutic potential of FGF21 in metabolic diseases: From bench to clinic. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020, 16, 654–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ritchie, M.; Hanouneh, I.A.; Noureddin, M.; Rolph, T.; Alkhouri, N. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-21 based therapies: A magic bullet for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)? Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2020, 29, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, X.; Ge, H.; Weiszmann, J.; Hecht, R.; Li, Y.-S.; Véniant, M.M.; Xu, J.; Wu, X.; Lindberg, R.; Li, Y. Inhibition of lipolysis may contribute to the acute regulation of plasma FFA and glucose by FGF21 in ob/ob mice. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 3230–3234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Hale, C.; Chen, M.M.; Stanislaus, S.; Chinookoswong, N.; Hager, T.; Wang, M.; Véniant, M.M.; Xu, J. Lack of Overt FGF21 Resistance in Two Mouse Models of Obesity and Insulin Resistance. Endocrinology 2012, 153, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Weng, Y.; Chabot, J.R.; Bernardo, B.; Yan, Q.; Zhu, Y.; Brenner, M.B.; Vage, C.; Logan, A.; Calle, R.; Talukdar, S. Pharmacokinetics (PK), Pharmacodynamics (PD) and Integrated PK/PD Modeling of a Novel Long Acting FGF21 Clinical Candidate PF-05231023 in Diet-Induced Obese and Leptin-Deficient Obese Mice. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0119104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kim, H.W.; Lee, J.E.; Cha, J.J.; Hyun, Y.Y.; Kim, J.E.; Lee, M.H.; Song, H.K.; Nam, D.H.; Han, J.Y.; Han, S.Y.; et al. Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 Improves Insulin Resistance and Ameliorates Renal Injury in db/db Mice. Endocrinology 2013, 154, 3366–3376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Ye, X.; Qi, J.; Ren, G.; Xu, P.; Wu, Y.; Zhu, S.; Yu, D.; Li, S.; Wu, Q.; Muhi, R.L.; et al. Long-lasting anti-diabetic efficacy of PEGylated FGF-21 and liraglutide in treatment of type 2 diabetic mice. Endocrine 2015, 49, 683–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Yu, D.; Ye, X.; Wu, Q.; Li, S.; Yang, Y.; He, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yuan, Q.; Liu, M.; et al. Insulin sensitizes FGF21 in glucose and lipid metabolisms via activating common AKT pathway. Endocrine 2016, 52, 527–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xu, P.; Zhang, Y.; Song, L.; Khoso, M.H.; Li, J.; Jiang, X.; He, J.; Li, J.; Ma, X.; Ren, G.; et al. Efficacy of a combination of high and low dosage of PEGylated FGF-21 in treatment of diabetes in db/db mice. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2016, 84, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ye, X.; Qi, J.; Yu, D.; Wu, Y.; Zhu, S.; Li, S.; Wu, Q.; Ren, G.; Li, D. Pharmacological efficacy of FGF21 analogue, liraglutide and insulin glargine in treatment of type 2 diabetes. J. Diabetes Its Complicat. 2017, 31, 726–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Liu, M.; Cao, H.; Hou, Y.; Sun, G.; Li, D.; Wang, W. Liver Plays a Major Role in FGF-21 Mediated Glucose Homeostasis. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 45, 1423–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Makarova, E.; Kazantseva, A.; Dubinina, A.; Jakovleva, T.; Balybina, N.; Baranov, K.; Bazhan, N. The Same Metabolic Response to FGF21 Administration in Male and Female Obese Mice Is Accompanied by Sex-Specific Changes in Adipose Tissue Gene Expression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kühnen, P.; Wiegand, S.; Biebermann, H. Pharmacological treatment strategies for patients with monogenic obesity. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 33, 967–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Farooqi, I.S.; Keogh, J.M.; Yeo, G.S.H.; Lank, E.J.; Cheetham, T.; O’Rahilly, S. Clinical Spectrum of Obesity and Mutations in the Melanocortin 4 Receptor Gene. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 348, 1085–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Hill, J.W.; Faulkner, L.D. The Role of the Melanocortin System in Metabolic Disease: New Developments and Advances. Neuroendocrinology 2017, 104, 330–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Krashes, M.J.; Lowell, B.B.; Garfield, A.S. Melanocortin-4 receptor–regulated energy homeostasis. Nat. Neurosci. 2016, 19, 206–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Da Silva, A.A.; do Carmo, J.M.; Hall, J.E. CNS Regulation of Glucose Homeostasis: Role of the Leptin-Melanocortin System. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2020, 20, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nogueiras, R.; Wiedmer, P.; Perez-Tilve, D.; Veyrat-Durebex, C.; Keogh, J.M.; Sutton, G.M.; Pfluger, P.T.; Castaneda, T.R.; Neschen, S.; Hofmann, S.M.; et al. The central melanocortin system directly controls peripheral lipid metabolism. J. Clin. Investig. 2007, 117, 3475–3488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Huszar, D.; Lynch, C.A.; Fairchild-Huntress, V.; Dunmore, J.H.; Fang, Q.; Berkemeier, L.R.; Gu, W.; Kesterson, R.A.; Boston, B.A.; Cone, R.D.; et al. Targeted Disruption of the Melanocortin-4 Receptor Results in Obesity in Mice. Cell 1997, 88, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Butler, A.; Cone, R. The melanocortin receptors: Lessons from knockout models. Neuropeptides 2002, 36, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Litt, M.J.; Okoye, G.D.; Lark, D.; Cakir, I.; Moore, C.; Barber, M.; Atkinson, J.; Fessel, J.; Moslehi, J.; Cone, R.D. Loss of the melanocortin-4 receptor in mice causes dilated cardiomyopathy. eLife 2017, 6, e28118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Itoh, M.; Suganami, T.; Nakagawa, N.; Tanaka, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Kamei, Y.; Terai, S.; Sakaida, I.; Ogawa, Y. Melanocortin 4 Receptor–Deficient Mice as a Novel Mouse Model of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Am. J. Pathol. 2011, 179, 2454–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ramachandrappa, S.; Farooqi, I.S. Genetic approaches to understanding human obesity. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 2080–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yeo, G.S.H.; Chao, D.H.M.; Siegert, A.M.; Koerperich, Z.M.; Ericson, M.D.; Simonds, S.E.; Larson, C.M.; Luquet, S.; Clarke, I.; Sharma, S.; et al. The melanocortin pathway and energy homeostasis: From discovery to obesity therapy. Mol. Metab. 2021, 48, 101206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lutz, T.A. An Overview of Rodent Models of Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes. In Methods in Molecular Biology; Humana: New York, NY, USA, 2020; Volume 2128. [Google Scholar]
  36. Bultman, S.J.; Michaud, E.J.; Woychik, R. Molecular characterization of the mouse agouti locus. Cell 1992, 71, 1195–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mountjoy, K.G.; Willard, D.H.; Wilkison, W.O. Agouti Antagonism of Melanocortin-4 Receptor: Greater Effect with Desacetyl-α-Melanocyte-Stimulating Hormone (MSH) than with α-MSH. Endocrinology 1999, 140, 2167–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wolff, G.L.; Roberts, D.W.; Mountjoy, K.G. Physiological consequences of ectopic agouti gene expression: The yellow obese mouse syndrome. Physiol. Genom. 1999, 1, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Derkach, K.; Zakharova, I.; Zorina, I.; Bakhtyukov, A.; Romanova, I.; Bayunova, L.; Shpakov, A. The evidence of metabolic-improving effect of metformin in Ay/a mice with genetically-induced melanocortin obesity and the contribution of hypothalamic mechanisms to this effect. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0213779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Makarova, E.N.; Yakovleva, T.V.; Balyibina, N.Y.; Baranov, K.O.; Denisova, E.I.; Dubinina, A.D.; Feofanova, N.A.; Bazhan, N.M. Pharmacological effects of fibroblast growth factor 21 are sex-specific in mice with the lethal yellow (Ay) mutation. Vavilov J. Genet. Breed. 2020, 24, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Hart-Unger, S.; Arao, Y.; Hamilton, K.J.; Lierz, S.; Malarkey, D.E.; Hewitt, S.; Freemark, M.; Korach, K.S. Hormone signaling and fatty liver in females: Analysis of estrogen receptor α mutant mice. Int. J. Obes. 2017, 41, 945–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Zhao, L.; Zou, X.; Feng, Z.; Luo, C.; Liu, J.; Li, H.; Chang, L.; Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Long, J.; et al. Evidence for association of mitochondrial metabolism alteration with lipid accumulation in aging rats. Exp. Gerontol. 2014, 56, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Roehrig, K.L.; Allred, J.B. Direct enzymatic procedure for the determination of liver glycogen. Anal. Biochem. 1974, 58, 414–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Marie, L.S.; Miura, G.I.; Marsh, D.J.; Yagaloff, K.; Palmiter, R.D. A metabolic defect promotes obesity in mice lacking melanocortin-4 receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 12339–12344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Voss-Andreae, A.; Murphy, J.G.; Ellacott, K.L.J.; Stuart, R.C.; Nillni, E.A.; Cone, R.D.; Fan, W. Role of the Central Melanocortin Circuitry in Adaptive Thermogenesis of Brown Adipose Tissue. Endocrinology 2007, 148, 1550–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Albarado, D.C.; McClaine, J.; Stephens, J.M.; Mynatt, R.L.; Ye, J.; Bannon, A.W.; Richards, W.G.; Butler, A. Impaired Coordination of Nutrient Intake and Substrate Oxidation in Melanocortin-4 Receptor Knockout Mice. Endocrinology 2004, 145, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Miltenberger, R.J.; Mynatt, R.L.; Wilkinson, J.E.; Woychik, R.P. The role of the agouti gene in the yellow obese syndrome. J. Nutr. 1997, 127, 1902S–1907S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Laeger, T.; Baumeier, C.; Wilhelmi, I.; Würfel, J.; Kamitz, A.; Schürmann, A. FGF21 improves glucose homeostasis in an obese diabetes-prone mouse model independent of body fat changes. Diabetologia 2017, 60, 2274–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Bazhan, N.; Yakovleva, T.; Kazantseva, A.; Makarova, E. Exaggerated anorexigenic response to restraint stress in Ay mice is associated with elevated CRFR2 mRNA expression in the hypothalamus. Physiol. Behav. 2013, 120, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Owen, B.; Ding, X.; Morgan, D.A.; Coate, K.; Bookout, A.L.; Rahmouni, K.; Kliewer, S.A.; Mangelsdorf, D.J. FGF21 Acts Centrally to Induce Sympathetic Nerve Activity, Energy Expenditure, and Weight Loss. Cell Metab. 2014, 20, 670–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Moure, R.; Cairó, M.; Morón-Ros, S.; Quesada-López, T.; Campderrós, L.; Cereijo, R.; Hernáez, A.; Villarroya, F.; Giralt, M. Levels of β-klotho determine the thermogenic responsiveness of adipose tissues: Involvement of the autocrine action of FGF21. Am. J. Physiol.-Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 320, E822–E834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Challa, T.D.; Dapito, D.H.; Kulenkampff, E.; Kiehlmann, E.; Moser, C.; Straub, L.; Sun, W.; Wolfrum, C. A Genetic Model to Study the Contribution of Brown and Brite Adipocytes to Metabolism. Cell Rep. 2020, 30, 3424–3433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Berglund, E.D.; Liu, T.; Kong, X.; Sohn, J.-W.; Vong, L.; Deng, Z.; Lee, C.E.; Lee, S.; Williams, K.; Olson, D.; et al. Melanocortin 4 receptors in autonomic neurons regulate thermogenesis and glycemia. Nat. Neurosci. 2014, 17, 911–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Zhou, L.; Yu, M.; Arshad, M.; Wang, W.; Lu, Y.; Gong, J.; Gu, Y.; Li, P.; Xu, L. Coordination among Lipid Droplets, Peroxisomes, and Mitochondria Regulates Energy Expenditure through the CIDE-ATGL-PPARα Pathway in Adipocytes. Diabetes 2018, 67, 1935–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. BonDurant, L.D.; Ameka, M.; Naber, M.C.; Markan, K.; Idiga, S.O.; Acevedo, M.R.; Walsh, S.; Ornitz, D.; Potthoff, M.J. FGF21 Regulates Metabolism through Adipose-Dependent and -Independent Mechanisms. Cell Metab. 2017, 25, 935–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Lewis, J.E.; Monnier, C.; Marshall, H.; Fowler, M.; Green, R.; Cooper, S.; Chiotellis, A.; Luckett, J.; Perkins, A.C.; Coskun, T.; et al. Whole-body and adipose tissue-specific mechanisms underlying the metabolic effects of fibroblast growth factor 21 in the Siberian hamster. Mol. Metab. 2020, 31, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Li, Y.; Wong, K.; Giles, A.; Jiang, J.; Lee, J.W.; Adams, A.C.; Kharitonenkov, A.; Yang, Q.; Gao, B.; Guarente, L.; et al. Hepatic SIRT1 Attenuates Hepatic Steatosis and Controls Energy Balance in Mice by Inducing Fibroblast Growth Factor 21. Gastroenterology 2014, 146, 539–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Camporez, J.P.G.; Jornayvaz, F.; Petersen, M.C.; Pesta, D.; Guigni, B.; Serr, J.; Zhang, D.; Kahn, M.; Samuel, V.T.; Jurczak, M.; et al. Cellular Mechanisms by Which FGF21 Improves Insulin Sensitivity in Male Mice. Endocrinology 2013, 154, 3099–3109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Lightfoot, J.T.; Turner, M.J.; Daves, M.; Vordermark, A.; Kleeberger, S.R. Genetic influence on daily wheel running activity level. Physiol. Genom. 2005, 19, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Goforth, P.B.; Myers, M.G. Roles for Orexin/Hypocretin in the control of energy balance and metabolism. In Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 33. [Google Scholar]
  61. Choudhury, J.; Sanyal, A.J. Insulin resistance and the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin. Liver Dis. 2004, 8, 575–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Armandi, A.; Rosso, C.; Caviglia, G.; Bugianesi, E. Insulin Resistance across the Spectrum of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Metabolites 2021, 11, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Toda, K.; Toda, A.; Ono, M.; Saibara, T. Lack of 17β-estradiol reduces sensitivity to insulin in the liver and muscle of male mice. Heliyon 2018, 4, e00772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Khoramipour, K.; Chamari, K.; Hekmatikar, A.A.; Ziyaiyan, A.; Taherkhani, S.; Elguindy, N.M.; Bragazzi, N.L. Adiponectin: Structure, physiological functions, role in diseases, and effects of nutrition. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. González-García, I.; Tena-Sempere, M.; López, M. Estradiol regulation of brown adipose tissue thermogenesis. In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 1043. [Google Scholar]
  66. Monjo, M.; Rodríguez, A.M.; Palou, A.; Roca, P. Direct Effects of Testosterone, 17β-Estradiol, and Progesterone on Adrenergic Regulation in Cultured Brown Adipocytes: Potential Mechanism for Gender-Dependent Thermogenesis. Endocrinology 2003, 144, 4923–4930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Yan, H.; Yang, W.; Zhou, F.; Li, X.; Pan, Q.; Shen, Z.; Han, G.; Newell-Fugate, A.; Tian, Y.; Majeti, R.; et al. Estrogen Improves Insulin Sensitivity and Suppresses Gluconeogenesis via the Transcription Factor Foxo1. Diabetes 2019, 68, 291–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. López, M.; Tena-Sempere, M. Estradiol effects on hypothalamic AMPK and BAT thermogenesis: A gateway for obesity treatment? Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 178, 109–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lieu, L.; Chau, D.; Afrin, S.; Dong, Y.; Alhadeff, A.L.; Betley, J.N.; Williams, K.W. Effects of metabolic state on the regulation of melanocortin circuits. Physiol. Behav. 2020, 224, 113039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Masaki, T.; Chiba, S.; Yasuda, T.; Tsubone, T.; Kakuma, T.; Shimomura, I.; Funahashi, T.; Matsuzawa, Y.; Yoshimatsu, H. Peripheral, but Not Central, Administration of Adiponectin Reduces Visceral Adiposity and Upregulates the Expression of Uncoupling Protein in Agouti Yellow (Ay/a) Obese Mice. Diabetes 2003, 52, 2266–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. DeFronzo, R.A.; Tripathy, D. Skeletal Muscle Insulin Resistance Is the Primary Defect in Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009, 32, S157–S163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Camporez, J.P.G.; Jornayvaz, F.; Lee, H.-Y.; Kanda, S.; Guigni, B.; Kahn, M.; Samuel, V.T.; Carvalho, C.; Petersen, K.F.; Jurczak, M.; et al. Cellular Mechanism by Which Estradiol Protects Female Ovariectomized Mice From High-Fat Diet-Induced Hepatic and Muscle Insulin Resistance. Endocrinology 2013, 154, 1021–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. D’Souza, A.M.; Neumann, U.H.; Glavas, M.M.; Kieffer, T.J. The glucoregulatory actions of leptin. Mol. Metab. 2017, 6, 1052–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Boston, B.A.; Blaydon, K.M.; Varnerin, J.; Cone, R.D. Independent and Additive Effects of Central POMC and Leptin Pathways on Murine Obesity. Science 1997, 278, 1641–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Gupte, A.A.; Lyon, C.J.; Hsueh, W.A. Nuclear Factor (Erythroid-Derived 2)-Like-2 Factor (Nrf2), a Key Regulator of the Antioxidant Response to Protect Against Atherosclerosis and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2013, 13, 362–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Kanda, T.; Matsuoka, S.; Yamazaki, M.; Shibata, T.; Nirei, K.; Takahashi, H.; Kaneko, T.; Fujisawa, M.; Higuchi, T.; Nakamura, H.; et al. Apoptosis and non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases. World J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 24, 2661–2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Fabregat, I.; Moreno-Caceres, J.; Sánchez, A.; Dooley, S.; Dewidar, B.; Giannelli, G.; Dijke, P.T.; IT-LIVER Consortium. TGF-β signalling and liver disease. FEBS J. 2016, 283, 2219–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Thiele, N.D.; Wirth, J.W.; Steins, D.; Koop, A.C.; Ittrich, H.; Lohse, A.W.; Kluwe, J. TIMP-1 is upregulated, but not essential in hepatic fibrogenesis and carcinogenesis in mice. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tomaš, T.C.; Urlep, Ž.; Moškon, M.; Mraz, M.; Rozman, D. LiverSex Computational Model: Sexual Aspects in Hepatic Metabolism and Abnormalities. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lonardo, A.; Nascimbeni, F.; Ballestri, S.; Fairweather, D.; Win, S.; Than, T.A.; Abdelmalek, M.F.; Suzuki, A. Sex Differences in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: State of the Art and Identification of Research Gaps. Hepatology 2019, 70, 1457–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cells 10 03440 g001 550
Figure 1. Influence of FGF21 administration on body weight and food intake in obese Ay male and female mice. Data are presented as mean ± SE. Mice were administered FGF21 for 7 days from day 0.
Figure 1. Influence of FGF21 administration on body weight and food intake in obese Ay male and female mice. Data are presented as mean ± SE. Mice were administered FGF21 for 7 days from day 0.
Cells 10 03440 g001
Cells 10 03440 g002 550
Figure 2. Influence of FGF21 administration on locomotor activity in obese Ay male and female mice. Data are presented as mean ± SE. Mice were administered FGF21 for 7 days from day 0. Day “−1” is the day before the start of the experiment.
Figure 2. Influence of FGF21 administration on locomotor activity in obese Ay male and female mice. Data are presented as mean ± SE. Mice were administered FGF21 for 7 days from day 0. Day “−1” is the day before the start of the experiment.
Cells 10 03440 g002
Cells 10 03440 g003 550
Figure 3. Liver structure (A), and influence of FGF21 administration on lipid accumulation in hepatocytes (B), liver index (C), fat content (D), macrophage infiltration (E), sizes of lipid droplets in hepatocytes (F), and number of apoptotic bodies (G) in obese Ay male and female mice. A- Liver structure of C57BL/6J-Ay mice. Staining with hematoxylin and eosin. Magnification ×1000. (a) Hepatocytes with large-size lipid inclusions occupying the entire volume of the cytoplasm (arrows). (b) Hepatocytes with medium-size lipid inclusions. Individual lipid droplets are visualized (arrow). (c) Hepatocytes with small-size lipid inclusions. Individual small lipid droplets are visible (arrow). (d) Lipid droplet in the hepatocyte nucleus (arrow). (e) Apoptotic bodies in the liver parenchyma (arrows). (f) Accumulation of macrophages in the liver parenchyma (arrow). B—Sex differences in lipid accumulation in the liver of C57BL/6J-Ay mice. Mice were administered FGF21 for 7 days. Staining with hematoxylin and eosin. Magnification ×100. The number of hepatocytes with large and medium lipid droplets in the liver of PBS-treated males (a) and females (b) and FGF21-treated males (c) and females (d). C-G Data are presented as mean ± SE. Significant influence (p < 0.05) of factors “e” (administration of PBS or FGF21), “s” (sex), and “s*e”, two-way ANOVA, are indicated in the plots. The volume densities of hepatocytes with small, medium, and large lipid inclusions were determined at ×100 magnification. The volume densities of macrophages and apoptotic bodies in the liver parenchyma were counted at ×400 magnification. A closed test system consisting of 1276 points was used for morphometry.
Figure 3. Liver structure (A), and influence of FGF21 administration on lipid accumulation in hepatocytes (B), liver index (C), fat content (D), macrophage infiltration (E), sizes of lipid droplets in hepatocytes (F), and number of apoptotic bodies (G) in obese Ay male and female mice. A- Liver structure of C57BL/6J-Ay mice. Staining with hematoxylin and eosin. Magnification ×1000. (a) Hepatocytes with large-size lipid inclusions occupying the entire volume of the cytoplasm (arrows). (b) Hepatocytes with medium-size lipid inclusions. Individual lipid droplets are visualized (arrow). (c) Hepatocytes with small-size lipid inclusions. Individual small lipid droplets are visible (arrow). (d) Lipid droplet in the hepatocyte nucleus (arrow). (e) Apoptotic bodies in the liver parenchyma (arrows). (f) Accumulation of macrophages in the liver parenchyma (arrow). B—Sex differences in lipid accumulation in the liver of C57BL/6J-Ay mice. Mice were administered FGF21 for 7 days. Staining with hematoxylin and eosin. Magnification ×100. The number of hepatocytes with large and medium lipid droplets in the liver of PBS-treated males (a) and females (b) and FGF21-treated males (c) and females (d). C-G Data are presented as mean ± SE. Significant influence (p < 0.05) of factors “e” (administration of PBS or FGF21), “s” (sex), and “s*e”, two-way ANOVA, are indicated in the plots. The volume densities of hepatocytes with small, medium, and large lipid inclusions were determined at ×100 magnification. The volume densities of macrophages and apoptotic bodies in the liver parenchyma were counted at ×400 magnification. A closed test system consisting of 1276 points was used for morphometry.
Cells 10 03440 g003
Cells 10 03440 g004 550
Figure 4. Influence of FGF21 administration on liver gene expression in obese Ay male and female mice. Data are presented as mean ± SE. Mice were administered FGF21 for 7 days. Significant influence (p < 0.05) of factors “e” (administration of PBS or FGF21), “s” (sex), and “s*e”, two-way ANOVA, are indicated in the plot.
Figure 4. Influence of FGF21 administration on liver gene expression in obese Ay male and female mice. Data are presented as mean ± SE. Mice were administered FGF21 for 7 days. Significant influence (p < 0.05) of factors “e” (administration of PBS or FGF21), “s” (sex), and “s*e”, two-way ANOVA, are indicated in the plot.
Cells 10 03440 g004
Cells 10 03440 g005 550
Figure 5. Influence of FGF21 administration on iBAT gene expression in obese Ay male and female mice. Data are presented as mean ± SE. Mice were administered FGF21 for 7 days. Significant influence (p < 0.05) of factors “e” (administration of PBS or FGF21), “s” (sex), two-way ANOVA are indicated in the plot.
Figure 5. Influence of FGF21 administration on iBAT gene expression in obese Ay male and female mice. Data are presented as mean ± SE. Mice were administered FGF21 for 7 days. Significant influence (p < 0.05) of factors “e” (administration of PBS or FGF21), “s” (sex), two-way ANOVA are indicated in the plot.
Cells 10 03440 g005
Cells 10 03440 g006 550
Figure 6. Influence of FGF21 administration on visceral WAT gene expression in obese Ay male and female mice. Data are presented as mean ± SE. Mice were administered FGF21 for 7 days. Significant influence (p < 0.05) of factors “e” (administration of PBS or FGF21), “s” (sex), and “s*e”, two-way ANOVA are indicated in the plot.
Figure 6. Influence of FGF21 administration on visceral WAT gene expression in obese Ay male and female mice. Data are presented as mean ± SE. Mice were administered FGF21 for 7 days. Significant influence (p < 0.05) of factors “e” (administration of PBS or FGF21), “s” (sex), and “s*e”, two-way ANOVA are indicated in the plot.
Cells 10 03440 g006
Cells 10 03440 g007 550
Figure 7. Influence of FGF21 administration on muscle gene expression in obese Ay male and female mice. Data are presented as mean ± SE. Mice were administered FGF21 for 7 days. Significant influence (p < 0.05) of the interaction of factors “e” (administration of PBS or FGF21) and “s” (sex) “s*e” two-way ANOVA is indicated in the plot.
Figure 7. Influence of FGF21 administration on muscle gene expression in obese Ay male and female mice. Data are presented as mean ± SE. Mice were administered FGF21 for 7 days. Significant influence (p < 0.05) of the interaction of factors “e” (administration of PBS or FGF21) and “s” (sex) “s*e” two-way ANOVA is indicated in the plot.
Cells 10 03440 g007
Cells 10 03440 g008 550
Figure 8. Influence of FGF21 administration on hypothalamic gene expression in obese Ay male and female mice. Data are presented as mean ± SE. Mice were administered FGF21 for 7 days. Significant influence (p < 0.05) of factors “s” (sex) and “s*e” where “e” is the administration of PBS or FGF21, two-way ANOVA are indicated in the plot.
Figure 8. Influence of FGF21 administration on hypothalamic gene expression in obese Ay male and female mice. Data are presented as mean ± SE. Mice were administered FGF21 for 7 days. Significant influence (p < 0.05) of factors “s” (sex) and “s*e” where “e” is the administration of PBS or FGF21, two-way ANOVA are indicated in the plot.
Cells 10 03440 g008
Table
Table 1. TaqMan Gene Expression Assays used for relative quantitation real-time PCR.
Table 1. TaqMan Gene Expression Assays used for relative quantitation real-time PCR.
ProteinGeneGene Expression Assay ID
Acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase alphaAccaMm01304285_m1
Acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase betaAccbMm01204683_m1
Agouti related neuropeptideAgrpMm00475829_g1
Apolipoprotein BApobMm01545150_m1
Beta-2-microglobulinB2mMm00437762_m1
Beta-actinActbMm00607939_s1
Carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1aCpt1aMm01231183_m1
Carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1bCpt1bMm00487191_g1
CD68 antigenCd68Mm03047343_m1
Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3Ccl3Mm00441259_g1
Corticotropin releasing hormoneCrhMm01293920_s1
Deiodinase, iodothyronine, type IIDio2Mm00515664_m1
Fatty acid synthaseFasnMm00662319_m1
Fibroblast growth factor 21Fgf21Mm00840165_g1
GlucokinaseGckMm00439129_m1
Glucose-6-phosphatase, catalyticG6pcMm00839363_m1
HypocretinHcrtMm01964030_s1
Hypoxia inducible factor 1, alpha subunitHif1aMm00468869_m1
Insulin receptorInsrMm01211875_m1
Insulin receptor substrate 1Irs1Mm01278327_m1
Insulin receptor substrate 2Irs2Mm03038438_m1
Insulin-like growth factor 1Igf1Mm00439560_m1
Interleukin 1 betaIl1bMm00434228_m1
Klotho betaKlbMm00473122_m1
Leptin receptorLeprMm00440181_m1
Lipase, hormone sensitiveLipeMm00495359_m1
Lipoprotein lipaseLplMm00434764_m1
Melanocortin receptor type 4Mc4rMm00457483_s1
Microsomal triglyceride transfer proteinMttpMm00435015_m1
Neuropeptide YNpyMm01410146_m1
Nuclear factor, erythroid derived 2, like 2Nfe2l2Mm00477784_m1
Patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 2 (adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL))Pnpla2Mm00503040_m1
Peroxisome proliferative activated receptor, gamma, coactivator 1 alphaPpargc1a
(Pgc1)		Mm01208835_m1
Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alphaPparaMm0040939_m1
Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gammaPpargMm00440940_m1
Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1, cytosolicPck1Mm01247058_m1
Pro-opiomelanocortinPomcMm00435874_m1
Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase, isoenzyme 4Pdk4Mm01166879_m1
Pyruvate kinase liver and red blood cellPklrMm00443090_m1
Signal transducer and activator of transcription 5AStat5Mm03053818_s1
Solute carrier family 2 (facilitated glucose transporter), member 2 (GLUT2)Slc2a2Mm00446229_m1
Solute carrier family 2 (facilitated glucose transporter), member 4 (GLUT4)Slc2a4Mm00436615_m1
Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1Timp1Mm01341361_m1
Transforming growth factor, beta 1Tgfb1Mm01178820_m1
Tumor necrosis factor alphaTnfaMm00443258_m1
Uncoupling protein 1 (mitochondrial, proton carrier)Ucp1Mm01244861_m1
Uncoupling protein 3 (mitochondrial, proton carrier)Ucp3Mm01163394_m1
Table
Table 2. Influence of FGF21 administration on the masses of the body, fat, and liver in obese Ay male and female mice. Results are presented as mean ± SE for the indicated number of mice. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA.
Table 2. Influence of FGF21 administration on the masses of the body, fat, and liver in obese Ay male and female mice. Results are presented as mean ± SE for the indicated number of mice. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA.
Ay MalesAy Femalesp ANOVA
PBS (n = 7)FGF21 (n = 7)PBS (n = 6)FGF21 (n = 6)
BW (g)46.9 ± 0.645.7 ± 1.246.5 ± 1.4548.2 ± 0.83ns
Lean mass (g)28.1 ± 0.428.0 ± 0.323.8 ± 0.6 #23.8 ± 0.5 #s
Fat mass (g)16.7 ± 0.616.0 ± 1.020.8 ± 1.0 #22.5 ± 0.7 #s
Liver weight (g)2.67 ± 0.062.15 ± 0.09 *1.98 ± 0.08 #2,12 ± 0.06s, e, s*e
iBAT weight (g)0.185 ± 0.0250.164 ± 0.0170.179 ± 0.0230.201 ± 0.026ns
* p < 0.05, FGF21 vs. PBS, males; # p < 0.05, females vs. males, post hoc Newman–Keuls test. Significant influence (p < 0.05) of factors “e” (administration of PBS or FGF21), “s” (sex), and “s*e”, or non-significant “ns”, two-way ANOVA, are indicated in the last column.
Table
Table 3. Influence of FGF21 administration on blood parameters in obese Ay male and female mice. Results are presented as mean ± SE for the indicated number of mice. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA.
Table 3. Influence of FGF21 administration on blood parameters in obese Ay male and female mice. Results are presented as mean ± SE for the indicated number of mice. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA.
Ay MalesAy Femalesp ANOVA
PBS (n = 7)FGF21 (n = 7)PBS (n = 6)FGF21 (n = 6)
Glucose (mM)12.6 ± 0.712.3 ± 1.310.9 ± 1.0611.1 ± 1.22ns
Triglycerides (mM)0.64 ± 0.030.93 ± 0.130.71 ± 0.040.78 ± 0.12p = 0.07, e
Cholesterol (mM)4.29 ± 0.083.94 ± 0.113.85 ± 0.164.00 ± 0.12p = 0.06, s*e
Free fatty acids (mM)0.92 ± 0.110.64 ± 0.140.88 ± 0.110.88 ± 0.12ns
Insulin (ng/mL)24.2 ± 4.612.6 ± 1.3 *11.0 ± 1.8 #14.1 ± 3.4s*e
Leptin (ng/mL)55.6 ± 6.640.7 ± 5.446.3 ± 4.555.4 ± 4.0s*e
Adiponectin (µg/mL)8.2 ± 0.48.5 ± 0.213.0 ± 0.6 #12.8 ± 0.5 #s
* p < 0.05, FGF21 vs. PBS, males; # p < 0.05, females vs. males, post hoc Newman–Keuls test. Significant influence (p < 0.05) of factors “e” (administration of PBS or FGF21), “s” (sex), and “s*e”, or non-significant “ns”, two-way ANOVA, are indicated in the last column.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Makarova, E.; Kazantseva, A.; Dubinina, A.; Denisova, E.; Jakovleva, T.; Balybina, N.; Bgatova, N.; Baranov, K.; Bazhan, N. Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) Administration Sex-Specifically Affects Blood Insulin Levels and Liver Steatosis in Obese Ay Mice. Cells 2021, 10, 3440. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10123440

AMA Style

Makarova E, Kazantseva A, Dubinina A, Denisova E, Jakovleva T, Balybina N, Bgatova N, Baranov K, Bazhan N. Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) Administration Sex-Specifically Affects Blood Insulin Levels and Liver Steatosis in Obese Ay Mice. Cells. 2021; 10(12):3440. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10123440

Chicago/Turabian Style

Makarova, Elena, Antonina Kazantseva, Anastasia Dubinina, Elena Denisova, Tatiana Jakovleva, Natalia Balybina, Nataliya Bgatova, Konstantin Baranov, and Nadezhda Bazhan. 2021. "Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) Administration Sex-Specifically Affects Blood Insulin Levels and Liver Steatosis in Obese Ay Mice" Cells 10, no. 12: 3440. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10123440

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop