Search Results (26)

Background/Objectives: Pancreatic cancer-associated cachexia (CAC) is a complex, multifactorial and multi-organ metabolic syndrome affecting approximately 80% of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Recent epidemiological data show that cachexia is a primary cause of mortality in PDAC, directly accounting for approximately 30% of cancer-related deaths and significantly limiting the tolerability of cancer therapy and is associated with adverse effects of treatment. It is defined by systemic weight loss, skeletal muscle atrophy (sarcopenia), and adipose tissue depletion, often driven by systemic inflammation and metabolic dysregulation. Methods: The literature was searched in PubMed and Scopus using combinations of keywords. The search covers the literature between 2016 and 2026, but papers before this period were also included because of their historical importance. Studies with higher evidential value, such as prospective studies, randomized controlled trials, and meta-analyses, were prioritized and emphasized in our analysis. Results: CAC in PC arises from a systemic inflammatory response driven by tumor–host interactions and the release of pro-inflammatory mediators, such as growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) and parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP), which promotes anorexia and weight loss. The most commonly used diagnostic criteria include unintentional weight loss of more than 5% of body mass within 6 months, a body mass index (BMI) below 20 kg/m², or weight loss greater than 2% in the presence of sarcopenia. Emerging evidence supports the use of AI-based body composition analysis and novel biomarkers, including GDF-15 levels, to improve the detection and monitoring of cachexia. This review highlights that, despite the absence of pharmacological agents specifically approved for CAC in the United States and Europe, current guidelines recommend multimodal supportive care, including low-dose olanzapine, nutritional support, and exercise-based interventions. Furthermore, we identify recent phase 2 trials targeting the GDF-15 pathway, such as the GDF-15 inhibitor ponsegromab, which have demonstrated significant improvements in body weight and physical activity, suggesting a potential breakthrough in targeted therapies for CAC. Conclusions: CAC in PDAC represents a critical unmet medical need in oncology. It manifests as a lethal systemic pathology that demands early identification and targeted personalized pharmacological and nutritional interventions. Early diagnosis and targeted intervention represent promising strategies for improving survival and quality of life in this high-risk patient population. Full article

Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial metabolic syndrome characterized by progressive skeletal muscle and adipose tissue loss, systemic inflammation, and poor clinical outcomes, and represents a major unmet clinical need in gastric cancer. Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF15) is a key mediator of cachexia-associated anorexia and tissue wasting; however, the upstream mechanisms regulating its expression in gastric cancer remain poorly defined. Leukemia Inhibitory Factor (LIF), a pleiotropic cytokine implicated in tumor progression and metabolic dysregulation, has emerged as a potential regulator of cachexia-related pathways. Here, we investigated the association between LIF in regulating GDF15 expression and its relationship with metabolic, inflammatory, and body composition alterations in gastric cancer. Transcriptomic profiling of paired neoplastic and non-neoplastic gastric mucosa from 61 gastric cancer patients revealed a significant upregulation of both LIF and GDF15 in tumor tissue, with a strong positive correlation between their expression levels. High GDF15 expression was associated with reduced overall survival, a finding validated in independent TCGA-STAD and ACRG cohorts. Intratumoral bile acid profiling uncovered a marked enrichment of primary bile acids and a depletion of secondary bile acids, resulting in reduced levels of bile acids with endogenous LIF receptor (LIFR) antagonist activity; elevated primary, LIFR non-antagonist bile acids were associated with worse survival outcomes. Clinically, increased LIF and GDF15 expression correlated with weight loss, heightened inflammatory burden, reduced serum protein and albumin levels, and impaired body composition in a sub-cohort of 19 patients. Notably, LIF expression showed a significant inverse association with both lumbar skeletal muscle index (L3SMI) and subcutaneous adipose tissue index (SATI). Mechanistically, experimental models demonstrated that LIF enhances proliferative activity in gastric cancer spheroids and exerts paracrine effects that impair myogenic differentiation and suppress hepatic metabolic gene expression. Collectively, these findings identify the LIF/GDF15 axis as a central driver of cancer-associated cachexia in gastric cancer and highlight LIF signaling as a potential therapeutic target. Full article

Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial metabolic syndrome characterized by progressive skeletal muscle wasting, chronic systemic inflammation, and profound metabolic imbalance. Sustained activation of the nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) signaling pathway lies at the core of its pathogenesis, driving muscle proteolysis, impairing regenerative capacity, disrupting adipose tissue homeostasis, and promoting insulin resistance and anorexia. By transcriptionally regulating catabolic and pro-inflammatory gene programs across skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, the liver, and the central nervous system, NF-κB establishes a self-amplifying inflammatory–metabolic loop that perpetuates tissue wasting and systemic dysfunction. Accumulating preclinical and clinical evidence identifies NF-κB as a viable therapeutic target in cancer cachexia. Pharmacologic inhibitors (e.g., SR12343, DHMEQ), anti-inflammatory strategies (e.g., nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and IL-6 receptor–targeting antibodies), and nutritional interventions (e.g., omega-3 fatty acids) have shown efficacy in attenuating cachexia-associated inflammation, metabolic dysregulation, and tissue loss. Notably, emerging multimodal approaches integrating NF-κB modulation with metabolic support, chemotherapy, and behavioral interventions demonstrate synergistic benefits. This review integrates current mechanistic insights and therapeutic advances, highlighting NF-κB as a central pathogenic axis and a compelling target for translational intervention in cancer cachexia. Full article

Colorectal cancer (CRC) cachexia is a multifactorial, treatment-limiting syndrome characterized by progressive loss of skeletal muscle with or without loss of fat mass, accompanied by systemic inflammation, anorexia, metabolic dysregulation, and impaired treatment tolerance. Despite decades of work, cachexia remains clinically underdiagnosed and therapeutically underserved, in part because canonical models treat tumor-derived factors and host inflammatory mediators as a largely ‘host-only’ network. In parallel, CRC is strongly linked to intestinal dysbiosis, barrier disruption, and microbial translocation. Extracellular vesicles (EVs)—host small EVs, tumor-derived EVs, and bacterial extracellular vesicles (including outer membrane vesicles)—may provide a mechanistically plausible, information-dense route by which these domains could be coupled. Here, we synthesize emerging evidence suggesting that cross-kingdom EV signaling may operate as a vesicular ecosystem spanning gut lumen, mucosa, circulation, and peripheral organs. We propose the “vesicular intersection layer” as a unifying framework for how heterogeneous EV cargos converge on shared host decoding hubs (e.g., pattern-recognition receptors and stress-response pathways) to potentially contribute to muscle catabolism. We critically evaluate what is known—and what remains unproven—about EV biogenesis, trafficking, and causal mechanisms in CRC cachexia, highlight methodological constraints in microbial EV isolation and attribution, and outline minimum evidentiary standards for cross-kingdom claims. Finally, we translate the framework into actionable hypotheses for EV-informed endotyping, biomarker development (including stool EV assays), and therapeutic strategies targeting shared signaling nodes (e.g., TLR4–p38) and endocrine mediators that are predominantly soluble but may be fractionally vesicle-associated (e.g., GDF15). By reframing CRC cachexia as an emergent property of tumor–host–microbiota vesicular communication, this review provides a roadmap for mechanistic studies and clinically tractable interventions. Full article

Background/Objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is associated with anorexia–cachexia syndrome, which negatively affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to evaluate HRQoL and functional status in CRC patients undergoing chemotherapy who were eligible for oral nutritional supplementation (ONS). Methods: In this prospective, randomized study, 72 patients with stage II–IV CRC were enrolled (40 intervention group [IG], 32 control group [CG]). IG received ONS (2 × 125 mL/day, 600 kcal, 36 g protein) for 12 weeks, while CG received dietary counseling only. HRQoL was assessed every 4 weeks with the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy (FAACT, version 4.0). Functional status was evaluated with the Karnofsky scale. Nutritional status was assessed using the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002), and body mass index (BMI), and appetite was assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02848807. Results: Mean FAACT score did not differ significantly between groups over 12 weeks (101.0 ± 22.8, 95% CI: 94.6–107.4 vs. 105.1 ± 21.4, 95% CI: 99.1–111.1; p = 0.06). However, the observed difference corresponded to an effect size at the lower bound of the moderate range. However, minimally important difference (MID) analysis demonstrated that clinically meaningful improvement was significantly more frequent in IG than in CG for global FAACT (32% vs. 8%; p = 0.03, OR = 5.50, 95% CI: 1.10–27.62, φ = 0.29), physical well-being (32% vs. 8%; p = 0.03, OR = 5.50, 95% CI: 1.10–27.62, φ = 0.29), and emotional well-being (38% vs. 4%; p = 0.002, OR = 14.86, 95% CI: 1.79–123.36, φ = 0.40). Functional well-being and anorexia/cachexia concerns showed favorable, but nonsignificant, trends (FWB improvement: 29% vs. 8%, p = 0.05, OR = 4.79, 95% CI: 0.95–24.27, φ = 0.26; ACS deterioration: 3% vs. 20%, p = 0.07, OR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.01–1.11, φ = 0.28). HRQoL correlated positively with nutritional status, appetite, and functional performance, while Karnofsky scores remained stable in both groups. Conclusions: ONS did not significantly change the mean QoL scores at the group level but increased the proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful improvement, particularly in the physical and emotional domains. These findings suggest that ONS may benefit selected patients who respond to nutritional interventions, underscoring the clinical relevance of individualized nutrition strategies in oncology. Full article

Cancer cachexia (CC) is a multifactorial, multi-organ syndrome characterized by systemic inflammation, metabolic dysregulation, anorexia, and progressive depletion of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. Despite its high prevalence among patients with advanced malignancies, effective therapeutic options remain limited. Recent studies have elucidated the molecular underpinnings of CC and the therapeutic potential of natural herbs, highlighting the involvement of central nervous system regulation, adipose tissue, immune responses, gut microbiota, skeletal muscle, and disruptions in anabolic–catabolic signaling pathways such as mTOR, UPS, NF-κB, and STAT3. Persistent inflammation induces E3 ubiquitin ligases (Atrogin-1/MuRF-1) through cytokines including IL-6 and TNF-α, thereby impairing muscle homeostasis, while suppression of anabolic cascades such as IGF-1/mTOR further aggravates muscle atrophy. The limited efficacy and adverse effects of synthetic agents like megestrol acetate underscore the value of herbal therapies as safer adjunctive strategies. Botanicals such as Coicis Semen, Scutellaria baicalensis, and Astragalus demonstrate anti-inflammatory and muscle-preserving activities by modulating NF-κB, IL-6, and oxidative stress signaling. Numerous investigations indicate that these herbs downregulate MuRF-1 and Atrogin-1 expression, enhance appetite, and attenuate muscle loss, though they exhibit minimal influence on tumor suppression. While promising, current evidence remains largely preclinical and mechanistic validation is incomplete. This review consolidates contemporary insights into CC pathogenesis and the bioactivity of herbal interventions, highlighting the need for translational research to bridge preclinical findings with clinical applicability. Full article

Background/Objectives: Anorexia–Cachexia Syndrome (ACS) is a multifactorial condition common in advanced chronic illnesses, leading to significant impacts on prognosis and quality of life. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the prevalence, management strategies, and clinical and patient-centered outcomes of ACS in a home-based palliative care team. Methods: Clinical records of 128 adult patients followed between 2021 and 2024 were analyzed. Data collected included sociodemographic variables, clinical diagnosis, nutritional parameters (Palliative Performance Scale (PPS), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA)), symptoms (anorexia, fatigue), interventions (enteral nutrition, psychological and rehabilitative support), and relevant medications. Statistical analysis included descriptive, inferential, and multivariable proportional hazard regression analysis to identify independent predictors of weight loss and anorexia. Results: Manifestations of ACS were observed across both oncologic and non-oncologic conditions. The prevalence of weight loss and anorexia were interrelated and were not different between diagnostic groups. Using multivariable analysis, higher baseline MNA scores (HR = 3.797, p = 0.006) and the use of enteral nutrition (HR = 7.418, p = 0.014) were independently associated with an increased risk of significant weight loss. Lower baseline PPS scores (HR = 0.069), use of enteral nutrition (HR = −0.890), and the presence of psychological support were protective for subsequent anorexia. Dexamethasone use was associated with greater nutritional decline in univariate models. Conclusions: The management of ACS in home palliative care requires the early identification of symptoms, multidisciplinary intervention, and personalized strategies beyond disease etiology. Risk of weight loss is associated with higher MNA scores, and these are best managed in the first week. In anorexia cases, psychological support is protective. Full article

Background: Cachexia is common in patients with oesophagogastric cancer. The syndrome is characterised by tissue wasting (muscle and fat), anorexia, and reduced physical function, which result from complex interactions between the tumour and its host. Heterogeneity in the diagnostic criteria used for cachexia has hindered their clinical utilisation. This study aimed to compare the two established cachexia definitions (Fearon’s consensus definition and the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition [GLIM] criteria) and their relationships with survival in patients with oesophagogastric cancer. Methods: Consecutive patients newly diagnosed with oesophagogastric cancer (January 2019 to December 2020) were identified from a prospective regional database. Involuntary weight loss, BMI, CT body composition analyses, and neutrophil–lymphocyte ratios were recorded at clinical staging. These data were used to assess patients for cachexia according to Fearon and GLIM diagnostic criteria. The primary outcome of interest was overall survival. Results: Overall, 465 patients (66.9% male, median 71 years) were diagnosed with oesophagogastric cancer during the 2-year study period. Cachectic proportions differed between definitions (Fearon: 59.1% vs. GLIM: 44.1%), and only 49.1% of the 322 patients who met one set of diagnostic criteria were cachectic according to both. Patients who met the GLIM criteria were significantly more comorbid and had a poorer performance status; however, no such difference was evident when using the Fearon definition. Those patients who met either set of diagnostic criteria had shorter survival than those who met neither (p < 0.001). Following adjustment for confounders, GLIM-defined cachexia was more strongly associated with reduced survival (aHR: 1.57 [95% CI: 1.25–1.96], p < 0.001) than Fearon-defined cachexia (aHR: 1.41 [95% CI: 1.13–1.76], p = 0.002). Patients who only met the Fearon diagnostic criteria had prolonged survival (median: 363 days) when compared to those who met only GLIM (median: 158 days) or both definitions (median: 120 days). A secondary analysis of those patients who met the GLIM diagnostic criteria (n = 205) compared the three potential phenotypical criteria used in this definition. Only reduced muscle mass, and not low BMI or weight loss, was associated with poorer survival (aHR: 1.88 [95% CI: 1.15–3.07], p = 0.012) in this group. Conclusions: Cancer cachexia is strongly associated with shortened survival in patients with oesophagogastric cancer. Classification using the GLIM criteria provides more effective prognostication and this definition should be utilised in multidisciplinary patient care. Full article

The experience of bearing witness to the lack of appetite and involuntary weight loss that characterizes cancer anorexia–cachexia syndrome (CACS) is reported to be stressful for family members. Research identifies that family members engage in a wide range of behaviors in response to a relative who shows minimal interest in eating and is literally ‘wasting away’ before their eyes. Some families, though concerned about the symptoms of CACS, do not dwell excessively on the patient’s nutritional intake while others continually harass the patient to eat and petition health care providers for aggressive nutritional interventions to eat in an attempt to stave off further physical deterioration. While studies have detailed how family members respond to a terminally ill relative with CACS, empirical work explicating the explanatory models of CACS that they hold is lacking. Explanatory models (EMs) reflect the beliefs and ideas that families have about why illness and symptoms occur, the extent to which they can be controlled, how they should be treated, and how interventions should be evaluated. To address this gap in the literature, a grounded theory study guided by Kleinman’s Explanatory Model questions was conducted with 25 family members of advanced cancer patients. The core category of ‘Wayfaring’ integrates the key categories of the model and maps onto Kleinman’s questions about CACS onset, etiology, natural course, physiological processes/anatomical structures involved, treatment, and the impacts of disease on patient and family. Findings suggest that a divergence between some biomedical constructions of CACS and explanatory models held by family members may fuel the family–health care provider conflict, thereby providing direction for communication with families about care of the patient with anorexia–cachexia. Full article

Light chain amyloidosis is a plasma–cell disorder with a poor prognosis. It is a progressive condition, causing worsening pain, disability, and life-limiting complications involving multiple organ systems. The medical regimen can be complex, including chemotherapy or immunotherapy for the disease itself, as well as treatment for pain, gastrointestinal and cardiorespiratory symptoms, and various secondary symptoms. Patients and their families must have a realistic awareness of the illness and of the goals and limitations of treatments in making informed decisions about medical therapy, supportive management, and end-of-life planning. Palliative care services can thus improve patients’ quality of life and may even reduce overall treatment costs. Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a clonal plasma cell disorder characterized by the excessive secretion of light chains by an indolent plasma cell clone that gradually accumulates in vital organs as amyloid fibrils and leads to end-organ damage. With progressive disease, most patients develop diverse clinical symptoms and complications that negatively impact quality of life and increase mortality. Complications include cardiac problems including heart failure, hypotension, pleural effusions, renal involvement including nephrotic syndrome with peripheral edema, gastrointestinal symptoms leading to anorexia and cachexia, complex pain syndromes, and mood disorders. The prognosis of patients with advanced AL amyloidosis is dismal. With such a complex presentation, and high morbidity and mortality rates, there is a critical need for the establishment of a palliative care program in clinical management. This paper provides an evidence-based overview of the integration of palliative care in the clinical management of AL amyloidosis as a means of reducing ER visits, rehospitalizations, and in-hospital mortality. We also discuss potential future collaborative directions in various aspects of clinical care related to AL amyloidosis. Full article

Background: Cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (CAS) is a multifactorial condition that is highly prevalent in advanced cancer patients and associated with significant reduction in functional performance, reduction in quality of life, and increased mortality. Currently, no medications are approved for this indication. Recently, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) released a rapid recommendation suggesting that low-dose olanzapine once daily may be used to treat cancer cachexia. Many questions still exist on how to use olanzapine for this indication in clinical practice. The objective of this review is to identify existing knowledge on the use of olanzapine for CAS. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted to identify the primary literature that involved olanzapine for anorexia and cachexia in cancer patients between 2000 and 2023. Results: Seven articles were identified and are discussed here, including two randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled studies, one randomized comparative study, two prospective open-label studies, one retrospective chart review, and one case report. Conclusions: Low dose olanzapine (2.5–5 mg once daily) may be useful in the treatment of CAS for increasing appetite, reducing nausea and vomiting, and promoting weight gain. Further large-scale multi-center randomized placebo-controlled studies will be needed to investigate the impact of olanzapine on weight change in CAS patients. Full article

Cancer cachexia is a complex malnutrition syndrome that causes progressive dysfunction. This syndrome is accompanied by protein and energy losses caused by reduced nutrient intake and the development of metabolic disorders. As many as 80% of patients with advanced cancer develop cancer cachexia; however, an effective targeted treatment remains to be developed. In this study, we developed a novel rat model that mimics the human pathology during cancer cachexia to elucidate the mechanism underlying the onset and progression of this syndrome. We subcutaneously transplanted rats with SLC cells, a rat lung adenocarcinoma cell line, and evaluated the rats’ pathophysiological characteristics. To ensure that our observations were not attributable to simple starvation, we evaluated the characteristics under tube feeding. We observed that SLC-transplanted rats exhibited severe anorexia, weight loss, muscle atrophy, and weakness. Furthermore, they showed obvious signs of cachexia, such as anemia, inflammation, and low serum albumin. The rats also exhibited weight and muscle losses despite sufficient nutrition delivered by tube feeding. Our novel cancer cachexia rat model is a promising tool to elucidate the pathogenesis of cancer cachexia and to conduct further research on the development of treatments and supportive care for patients with this disease. Full article

This study compared mirtazapine with megestrol in the management of cancer-related anorexia–cachexia syndrome in patients with advanced cancer. A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial involving patients with advanced cancer and anorexia–cachexia syndrome was performed. Participants received mirtazapine 30 mg/day or megestrol 320 mg/day for eight weeks. The primary endpoint was the effect of mirtazapine on weight gain and the secondary endpoints were its effect on appetite, muscle strength, physical performance, body composition, adverse events, and medication adherence. Linear regression model with mixed effects was applied and a significance level of 5% was adopted. Fifty-two patients were randomized. Mean age was 65.8 ± 8.4 years. There was weight gain in 52% of the participants in the megestrol group and in 38% in the mirtazapine group after four weeks (p = 0.040). Appetite improved in 92% of the participants in the megestrol group and in 56% in the mirtazapine group after eight weeks (p = 0.007). In the sub-analysis by sex, women showed improvement in appetite (p < 0.001) and weight gain (p < 0.005) in the mirtazapine group, which was not observed in men. Mirtazapine appears to be inferior to megestrol in weight and appetite improvement. However, there may be a difference in the therapeutic response between sexes. Full article

Malnutrition affects up to 75% of cancer patients and results from a combination of anorexia and metabolic dysregulation. Metabolic and nutritional abnormalities in cancer patients can lead to cachexia, a multifactorial syndrome characterized by involuntary loss of skeletal muscle mass, systemic inflammation and increased protein catabolism. Cancer cachexia negatively affects patients’ outcomes, response to anticancer treatments, quality of life, and survival. However, risk of malnutrition, and cachexia are still under-recognized in cancer patients. The Prevalence of Malnutrition in Oncology (PreMiO) study revealed that 51% of patients already had nutritional deficiencies at their first medical oncology visit. Here, we report the results of the subsequent retrospective, observational NUTRItional status at first medical oncology visit ON Clinical Outcomes (NUTRIONCO) study, aimed at assessing the impact of baseline nutritional and non-nutritional variables collected in the PreMiO study on the clinical outcomes of the same patients followed up from August 2019 to October 2021. We have highlighted a statistically significant association between baseline variables and patient death, rehospitalization, and disease progression at follow-up. We found a higher overall survival probability in the well-nourished general study population vs. malnourished patients (p < 0.001). Of major interest is the fact that patient stratification revealed that malnutrition decreased survival probability in non-metastatic patients but not in metastatic patients (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that baseline malnutrition (p = 0.004) and VAS score for appetite loss (p = 0.0104), in addition to albumin < 35 g/L (p < 0.0001) and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio > 3 (p = 0.0007), were independently associated with the death of non-metastatic patients at follow-up. These findings highlight the importance of proactive, early management of malnutrition and cachexia in cancer patients, and in particular, in non-metastatic patients, from the perspective of a substantial improvement of their clinical outcomes. Full article

Cancer cachexia is a complex multifactorial syndrome whose hallmarks are weight loss due to the wasting of muscle tissue with or without the loss of adipose tissue, anorexia, systemic inflammation, and multi-organ metabolic alterations, which negatively impact patients’ response to anticancer treatments, quality of life, and overall survival. Despite its clinical relevance, cancer cachexia often remains an underestimated complication due to the lack of rigorous diagnostic and therapeutic pathways. A number of studies have shown alterations in gut microbiota diversity and composition in association with cancer cachexia markers and symptoms, thus supporting a central role for dysbiosis in the pathogenesis of this syndrome. Different tools of microbiota manipulation, including probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation, have been investigated, demonstrating encouraging improvements in cachexia outcomes. Albeit pioneering, these studies pave the way for future research with the aim of exploring the role of gut microbiota in cancer cachexia more deeply and setting up effective microbiota-targeting interventions to be translated into clinical practice. Full article