Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (56)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = cardiac implantable electronic devices infections

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 1591 KiB  
Article
Antimicrobial Performance of a Novel Drug-Eluting Bioenvelope
by Zerelda Esquer Garrigos, Sunil Kapur, Michelle LeRoux Williams and M. Rizwan Sohail
Antibiotics 2025, 14(4), 330; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14040330 - 21 Mar 2025
Viewed by 1168
Abstract
Background: Preventing infections associated with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) and neurostimulators is essential to optimizing patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial performance of a biologic CIED envelope incorporating a bioabsorbable disc infused with rifampin and minocycline. Methods: The [...] Read more.
Background: Preventing infections associated with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) and neurostimulators is essential to optimizing patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial performance of a biologic CIED envelope incorporating a bioabsorbable disc infused with rifampin and minocycline. Methods: The antimicrobial activity was evaluated in a rabbit model and in vitro elution tests. Based on in vivo–in vitro correlation studies, a modified AATCC-100 method was used to quantitatively assess antibacterial activity across seven bacterial strains relevant to CIED infections. Results: Pharmacokinetic analysis showed a biphasic elution profile, with rapid initial release followed by more gradual elution over 14 days. The AATCC results showed no bacterial recovery for any tested species, with complete eradication in all replicates. Conclusions: These results support the use of antibiotic-eluting bioenvelopes as an effective strategy for preventing bacterial infections associated with CIED. The modified AATCC-100 test and in vivo–in vitro correlation studies provide new tools for the evaluation of the antibiotic activity of implantable biomaterials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Antimicrobial Materials and Surfaces)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 942 KiB  
Review
The Evolving Landscape of Infective Endocarditis: Difficult-to-Treat Resistance Bacteria and Novel Diagnostics at the Foreground
by Vasiliki Rapti, Efthymia Giannitsioti, Nikolaos Spernovasilis, Anna-Pelagia Magiorakos and Garyfallia Poulakou
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(6), 2087; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14062087 - 19 Mar 2025
Viewed by 888
Abstract
Infective endocarditis (IE) is a relatively rare but potentially life-threatening disease characterized by substantial mortality and long-term sequelae among the survivors. In recent decades, a dramatic change in the profile of patients diagnosed with IE has been observed primarily in developed countries, most [...] Read more.
Infective endocarditis (IE) is a relatively rare but potentially life-threatening disease characterized by substantial mortality and long-term sequelae among the survivors. In recent decades, a dramatic change in the profile of patients diagnosed with IE has been observed primarily in developed countries, most likely due to an aging population and a recent increase in invasive medical procedures. Nowadays, the typical IE patient is usually older, with complex comorbidities, and a history significant for cardiac disease, including degenerative heart valve disease, prosthetic valves, or cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Moreover, as patient risk factors change, predisposing them to more healthcare-associated IE, the microbiology of IE is also shifting; there are growing concerns regarding the rise in the incidence of IE caused by difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) bacteria in at-risk patients with frequent healthcare contact. The present review aims to explore the evolving landscape of IE and summarize the current knowledge on novel diagnostics to ensure timely diagnosis and outline optimal therapy for DTR bacterial IE. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiovascular Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

37 pages, 5922 KiB  
Review
Long-Term Complications Related to Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
by Jamie Simpson, Mason Yoder, Nathaniel Christian-Miller, Heather Wheat, Boldizsar Kovacs, Ryan Cunnane, Michael Ghannam and Jackson J. Liang
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(6), 2058; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14062058 - 18 Mar 2025
Viewed by 970
Abstract
Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are commonly used for a number of cardiac-related conditions, and it is estimated that over 300,000 CIEDs are placed annually in the US. With advances in technology surrounding these devices and expanding indications, CIEDs can remain implanted in [...] Read more.
Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are commonly used for a number of cardiac-related conditions, and it is estimated that over 300,000 CIEDs are placed annually in the US. With advances in technology surrounding these devices and expanding indications, CIEDs can remain implanted in patients for long periods of time. Although the safety profile of these devices has improved over time, both the incidence and prevalence of long-term complications are expected to increase. This review highlights pertinent long-term complications of CIEDs, including lead-related issues, device-related arrhythmias, inappropriate device therapies, and device-related infections. We also explore key clinical aspects of each complication, including common presentations, patient-specific and non-modifiable risk factors, diagnostic evaluation, and recommended management strategies. Our goal is to help spread awareness of CIED-related complications and to empower physicians to manage them effectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cardiac Arrhythmias: Current Status and Future Directions)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

11 pages, 3403 KiB  
Case Report
The Benefit and Harm of an Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator in a Patient with Heart Failure: A Case Report and Literature Review
by Mihai Grigore, Andreea-Maria Grigore, Traian-Vasile Constantin, Viorel Jinga and Adriana-Mihaela Ilieșiu
Reports 2025, 8(1), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/reports8010030 - 12 Mar 2025
Viewed by 478
Abstract
Background and Clinical Significance: Infective endocarditis (IE) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED-IE) is a severe condition with high mortality and increasing prevalence. Case Presentation: A 50-year-old man with diabetes, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, and a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) [...] Read more.
Background and Clinical Significance: Infective endocarditis (IE) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED-IE) is a severe condition with high mortality and increasing prevalence. Case Presentation: A 50-year-old man with diabetes, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, and a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) presented with fever and peripheral arthritis. Initially evaluated for rheumatic disease, IE was ruled out at an initial cardiac evaluation. A subsequent computed tomography scan revealed a renal tumor, leading to transfer to the urology department. The patient was later evaluated in our cardiology department, where transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography identified lead vegetations. Blood cultures and serologic tests remained negative. Empirical antibiotic therapy was initiated, and percutaneous ICD lead extraction was performed, with cultures remaining negative. After six weeks of antibiotic therapy the patient had a favorable outcome, then a subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) was implanted three months later for SCD prevention. The renal tumor required nephrectomy, confirming clear cell renal carcinoma. Conclusions: This case highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of blood culture-negative CIED-IE and underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in complex cases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology/Cardiovascular Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 255 KiB  
Article
Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Insights from a Retrospective Analysis of Multidrug-Resistant and Non-Multidrug-Resistant Isolates
by Georgios Schinas, Rafail Koros, Ioannis Ntalakouras, Skevos Sideris, Angelos Perperis, Georgios Leventopoulos, Periklis Davlouros and Karolina Akinosoglou
Pathogens 2025, 14(3), 215; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14030215 - 22 Feb 2025
Viewed by 587
Abstract
Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria are uncommon but potentially life-threatening. This study examined patients with Gram-negative CIED infections, investigating the clinical characteristics of patients harboring multidrug-resistant (MDR), versus non-MDR, isolates. A retrospective observational analysis was conducted at two [...] Read more.
Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria are uncommon but potentially life-threatening. This study examined patients with Gram-negative CIED infections, investigating the clinical characteristics of patients harboring multidrug-resistant (MDR), versus non-MDR, isolates. A retrospective observational analysis was conducted at two tertiary Greek University Hospitals from 2015 to 2020. Patients were identified through microbiological cultures from device-related sites (pocket, lead, generator), with infections classified as MDR or non-MDR based on antimicrobial susceptibility profiles. Comprehensive data were collected, including demographic characteristics, clinical parameters, procedural details—on both the last device procedure and subsequent extraction procedure—infection-related findings, and microbiological profiles. In total, 18 patients were identified, with an equal distribution of 9 MDR and 9 non-MDR cases. The study population had a median age of 78 years, with 33.3% female patients, and a median Charlson Comorbidity Index of four. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most prevalent isolated species. Comparative analysis revealed that MDR patients had higher median SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) scores (2 vs. 0, p = 0.07), longer time to device extraction (50% vs. 88.9% extracted within one month, p = 0.079), and higher blood culture positivity (80% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.135). Despite similar demographic characteristics, MDR infections demonstrated more complex clinical profiles, with a trend towards increased disease severity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hospital-Acquired Infections and Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Pathogens)
26 pages, 1658 KiB  
Review
New Diseases Related to Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs): An Overview
by Pasquale Crea, Federica Cocuzza, Salvatore Bonanno, Nicola Ferrara, Lucio Teresi, Diego La Maestra, Paolo Bellocchi, Antonino Micari, Alice Moncada, Antonio Micari, Gianluca Di Bella and Giuseppe Dattilo
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(4), 1322; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14041322 - 17 Feb 2025
Viewed by 803
Abstract
The widespread use of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs) has transformed the management of cardiac arrhythmias, improving survival and quality of life for millions. However, this progress has introduced a range of device-related complications, which can significantly impact patient outcomes. This review examines [...] Read more.
The widespread use of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs) has transformed the management of cardiac arrhythmias, improving survival and quality of life for millions. However, this progress has introduced a range of device-related complications, which can significantly impact patient outcomes. This review examines “new diseases” linked to CIEDs, categorizing them into physical (e.g., infections, venous obstruction, lead failure, and device recalls) and functional complications (e.g., arrhythmias, pacemaker syndrome, and left ventricular dysfunction). Prevention and management strategies are emphasized. Emerging technologies, such as leadless devices, quadripolar leads, and remote monitoring systems, hold promise in reducing risks and enhancing patient care. Future directions include integrating artificial intelligence for real-time monitoring, improving device durability, and exploring novel materials to minimize infections and mechanical failures. Understanding CIED-related complications is essential for healthcare providers to balance the benefits and risks of these life-saving technologies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3252 KiB  
Systematic Review
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections in Patients with Renal Insufficiency: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Deepak Chandramohan, Prabhat Singh, Hari Naga Garapati, Raghunandan Konda, Divya Chandramohan, Nihar Jena, Atul Bali and Prathap Kumar Simhadri
Diseases 2024, 12(10), 247; https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12100247 - 10 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1206
Abstract
(1) Background: Renal insufficiency is a risk factor for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection. (2) Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted from multiple electronic databases to identify studies. Using the random effects model, we calculated the pooled rates of CIED infection and [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Renal insufficiency is a risk factor for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection. (2) Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted from multiple electronic databases to identify studies. Using the random effects model, we calculated the pooled rates of CIED infection and their 95% confidence intervals. We also calculated the pooled odds ratios to determine the risk of CIED infections due to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We utilized the Cochran Q and I2 statistics to detect and quantify heterogeneity. (3) Results: A total of 17 studies comprising 359,784 patients with renal insufficiency were added to the meta-analysis. Out of these, 263,819 were CKD patients and 89,617 were ESRD patients. The pooled rate of CIED infection in patients with CKD was 4.3% (95% CI: 2–8.8; I2: 95.7), and in patients with ESRD, it was 4.8% (95% CI: 2.6–8.7; I2: 99.4). The pooled risk of CIED infection in the CKD population was OR 2.5 (95% CI: 1.9–3.3; p < 0.001; I2: 21.1), and in the ESRD population, it was OR 2.4 (95% CI: 1.01–5.7; p = 0.046; I2: 88.8). ESRD was associated with higher mortality, OR 2.5 (95% CI: 1.4–4.4.8; p = 0.001; I2: 95). (4) Conclusions: The presence of renal insufficiency increases the number of CIED infections. In particular, patients with ESRD have an increased risk of mortality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Infectious Disease Epidemiology 2024)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1411 KiB  
Article
Subcutaneous versus Transvenous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease Requiring Dialysis: Extended Long-Term Retrospective Multicenter Follow-Up
by Fabian Schiedat, Benjamin Meuterodt, Joachim Winter, Magnus Prull, Assem Aweimer, Michael Gotzmann, Stephen O’Connor, Christian Perings, Thomas Lawo, Ibrahim El-Battrawy, Christoph Hanefeld, Johannes Korth, Andreas Mügge and Axel Kloppe
J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14(8), 870; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14080870 - 17 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1427
Abstract
Background: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) prevent sudden cardiac death (SCD). Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis are at a very high risk of infection from cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation as well as mortality. In the present study, we compared [...] Read more.
Background: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) prevent sudden cardiac death (SCD). Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis are at a very high risk of infection from cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation as well as mortality. In the present study, we compared the long-term complications and outcomes between subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) and transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) recipients. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we analyzed a total of 43 patients with ESRD requiring dialysis who received either a prophylactic S-ICD (26 patients) or a single right ventricular lead TV-ICD (17 patients) at seven experienced centers in Germany. Follow-up was performed bi-annually, at the end of which the data concerning comorbidities and, if applicable, reason for death were checked and confirmed with patients’ general practitioner, nephrologist and cardiologist. Results: The median follow up duration was 95.6 months (range 42.8–126.3 months). Baseline characteristics were without noteworthy significant differences between groups. During follow-up (FU), there were significantly more device-associated infections (HR 8.72, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18 to 12.85, p < 0.05) and device-associated hospitalizations (HR 10.20, 95% CI 1.22 to 84.61, p < 0.001), as well as a higher cardiovascular mortality (HR 9.17, 95% CI 1.12 to 8.33, p < 0.05), in the TV-ICD group. The number of patients requiring hospitalization for any reason was significantly higher in the TV-ICD group (HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.12 to 6.41, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in overall mortality (HR 1.92, 95% CI 0.96 to 6.15, p = 0.274). Conclusions: Our data suggest that, in this extended follow-up in seriously compromised renal patients on dialysis, the S-ICD patients have statistically fewer device infections and hospitalizations as well as lower cardiac mortality compared with the TV-ICD cohort. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Methodology, Drug and Device Discovery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 603 KiB  
Review
Phage Therapy for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and Vascular Grafts: A Targeted Literature Review
by Matteo Passerini, Francesco Petri and Gina A. Suh
Pathogens 2024, 13(5), 424; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13050424 - 17 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1858
Abstract
Infections of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and vascular grafts are some of the most dreaded complications of these otherwise life-saving devices. Many of these infections are not responsive to conventional treatment, such as systemic antibiotics and surgical irrigation and debridement. Therefore, innovative [...] Read more.
Infections of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and vascular grafts are some of the most dreaded complications of these otherwise life-saving devices. Many of these infections are not responsive to conventional treatment, such as systemic antibiotics and surgical irrigation and debridement. Therefore, innovative strategies to prevent and manage these conditions are warranted. Among these, there is an increasing interest in phages as a therapeutical option. In this review, we aim to collect the available evidence for the clinical application of phage therapy for CIED and vascular graft infections through literature research. We found 17 studies for a total of 34 patients. Most of the indications were left ventricular assist device (LVAD) (n = 20) and vascular graft infections (n = 7). The bacteria most often encountered were Staphylococcus aureus (n = 18) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 16). Clinical improvements were observed in 21/34 (61.8%) patients, with microbiological eradication in 18/21 (85.7%) of them. In eight cases, an adverse event related to phage therapy was reported. Phage therapy is a promising option for difficult-to-treat CIED and vascular graft infections by means of an individualized approach. Clinical trials and expanded access programs for compassionate use are needed to further unveil the role of phage therapy in clinical application. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Updates in Infective Endocarditis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 979 KiB  
Review
Prevention and Risk Assessment of Cardiac Device Infections in Clinical Practice
by Andrea Matteucci, Carlo Pignalberi, Claudio Pandozi, Barbara Magris, Antonella Meo, Maurizio Russo, Marco Galeazzi, Giammarco Schiaffini, Stefano Aquilani, Stefania Angela Di Fusco and Furio Colivicchi
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(9), 2707; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092707 - 4 May 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2178
Abstract
The implantation of cardiac electronic devices (CIEDs), including pacemakers and defibrillators, has become increasingly prevalent in recent years and has been accompanied by a significant rise in cardiac device infections (CDIs), which pose a substantial clinical and economic burden. CDIs are associated with [...] Read more.
The implantation of cardiac electronic devices (CIEDs), including pacemakers and defibrillators, has become increasingly prevalent in recent years and has been accompanied by a significant rise in cardiac device infections (CDIs), which pose a substantial clinical and economic burden. CDIs are associated with hospitalizations and prolonged antibiotic therapy and often necessitate device removal, leading to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs worldwide. Approximately 1–2% of CIED implants are associated with infections, making this a critical issue to address. In this contemporary review, we discuss the burden of CDIs with their risk factors, healthcare costs, prevention strategies, and clinical management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Preventive Cardiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 976 KiB  
Article
Risk of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection after Early versus Delayed Lead Repositioning
by Noemi Schvartz, Arian Haidary, Reza Wakili, Florian Hecker, Jana Kupusovic, Elod-Janos Zsigmond, Marton Miklos, Laszlo Saghy, Tamas Szili-Torok, Julia W. Erath and Mate Vamos
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2024, 11(4), 117; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11040117 - 9 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1801
Abstract
(1) Background: Early reintervention increases the risk of infection of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Some operators therefore delay lead repositioning in the case of dislocation by weeks; however, there is no evidence to support this practice. The aim of our study was [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Early reintervention increases the risk of infection of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Some operators therefore delay lead repositioning in the case of dislocation by weeks; however, there is no evidence to support this practice. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of the timing of reoperation on infection risk. (2) Methods: The data from consecutive patients undergoing lead repositioning in two European referral centers were retrospectively analyzed. The odds ratio (OR) of CIED infection in the first year was compared among patients undergoing early (≤1 week) vs. delayed (>1 week to 1 year) reoperation. (3) Results: Out of 249 patients requiring CIED reintervention, 85 patients (34%) underwent an early (median 2 days) and 164 (66%) underwent a delayed lead revision (median 53 days). A total of nine (3.6%) wound/device infections were identified. The risk of infection was numerically lower in the early (1.2%) vs. delayed (4.9%) intervention group yielding no statistically significant difference, even after adjustment for typical risk factors for CIED infection (adjusted OR = 0.264, 95% CI 0.032–2.179, p = 0.216). System explantation/extraction was necessary in seven cases, all being revised in the delayed group. (4) Conclusions: In this bicentric, international study, delayed lead repositioning did not reduce the risk of CIED infection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cardiac Device Therapy)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 841 KiB  
Article
Mortality and Costs of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) Infections According to the Therapeutic Approach: A Single-Center Cohort Study
by Encarnación Gutiérrez-Carretero, Eduardo Arana-Rueda, Antonio Ortiz-Carrellán, Alonso Pedrote-Martínez, Mariano García-de-la-Borbolla and Arístides De Alarcón
Microorganisms 2024, 12(3), 537; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12030537 - 7 Mar 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1714
Abstract
Background: Cardiac device infections are serious adverse events associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, significant costs, and increased healthcare utilization. The aim of this study is to calculate the costs of treatment of cardiac implantable electrostimulation device (CIED)-related infections for different types of [...] Read more.
Background: Cardiac device infections are serious adverse events associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, significant costs, and increased healthcare utilization. The aim of this study is to calculate the costs of treatment of cardiac implantable electrostimulation device (CIED)-related infections for different types of infection (local or systemic) and therapeutic approaches. Patients and Methods: Single-center cohort (1985–2018). The costs of the CIED-related infections were analyzed according to initial treatment (antimicrobial treatment exclusively, local approach, or transvenous lead extraction (TLE)). Total costs (including those for hospitalization stay, drugs, extraction material, and newly implanted devices) were assigned to each case until its final resolution. Results: A total of 380 cases (233 local and 147 systemic infections) were analyzed. The average cost of systemic infection was EUR 34,086, mainly due to hospitalization (78.5%; mean: 24 ± 14 days), with a mortality rate of 10.8%. Local infection had a mortality rate of 2.5% (mainly related to the extraction procedure) and an average cost of EUR 21,790, which was higher in patients with resynchronization therapy devices and defibrillators (46% of total costs). Surgical procedures limited to the pocket for local infections resulted in a high rate of recurrence (87%), evolved to systemic infections in 48 patients, and had a higher cost compared to TLE (EUR 42,978 vs. EUR 24,699; p < 0.01). Conclusions: The costs of treating CIED-related infections are high and mainly related to the type of treatment and length of hospitalization. Complete device removal is always the most effective approach and is a cost-saving strategy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Infective Endocarditis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 5164 KiB  
Article
The Role of the 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Management of Patients Suspected of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices’ Infection
by Antonio Rosario Pisani, Dino Rubini, Corinna Altini, Rossella Ruta, Maria Gazzilli, Angela Sardaro, Francesca Iuele, Nicola Maggialetti and Giuseppe Rubini
J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14(1), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14010065 - 4 Jan 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1784
Abstract
Background: Infection of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDI) is a real public health problem. The main aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of CIEDI. Methods: A total of 48 patients, who performed [...] Read more.
Background: Infection of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDI) is a real public health problem. The main aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of CIEDI. Methods: A total of 48 patients, who performed 18F-FDG PET/CT for the clinical suspicion of CIEDI were retrospectively analyzed; all patients were provided with a model with procedural recommendations before the exam. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy (DA) of 18F-FDG PET/CT were calculated; the reproducibility of qualitative analysis was assessed with Cohen’s κ test. The semi-quantitative parameters (SUVmax, SQR and TBR) were evaluated in CIEDI+ and CIEDI− patients using the Student’ t-test; ROC curves were elaborated to detect cut-off values. The trend of image quality with regards to procedural recommendation adherence was evaluated. Results: Se, Sp, PPV, NPV and DA were respectively 96.2%, 81.8%, 86.2%, 94.7% and 89.6%. The reproducibility of qualitative analysis was excellent (K = 0.89). Semiquantitative parameters resulted statistically different in CIEDI+ and CIEDI− patients. Cut-off values were SUVmax = 2.625, SQR = 3.766 and TBR = 1.29. Trend curves showed increasing image quality due to adherence to procedural recommendations. Conclusions: 18F-FDG-PET/CT is a valid tool in the management of patients suspected of CIEDI and adherence to procedural recommendations improves its image quality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Research on the Imaging in Personalized Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 1684 KiB  
Review
Multimodality Imaging Diagnosis in Infective Endocarditis
by Elena Emilia Babes, Cristiana Bustea, Tiberia Ioana Ilias, Victor Vlad Babes, Silvia-Ana Luca, Constantin Tudor Luca, Andrei-Flavius Radu, Alexandra Georgiana Tarce, Alexa Florina Bungau and Cristian Bustea
Life 2024, 14(1), 54; https://doi.org/10.3390/life14010054 - 28 Dec 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2845
Abstract
Imaging is an important tool in the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis (IE). Echocardiography is an essential examination, especially in native valve endocarditis (NVE), but its diagnostic accuracy is reduced in prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE). The diagnostic ability is superior for transoesophageal [...] Read more.
Imaging is an important tool in the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis (IE). Echocardiography is an essential examination, especially in native valve endocarditis (NVE), but its diagnostic accuracy is reduced in prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE). The diagnostic ability is superior for transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE), but a negative test cannot exclude PVE. Both transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and TEE can provide normal or inconclusive findings in up to 30% of cases, especially in patients with prosthetic devices. New advanced non-invasive imaging tests are increasingly used in the diagnosis of IE. Nuclear medicine imaging techniques have demonstrated their superiority over TEE for the diagnosis of PVE and cardiac implantable electronic device infective endocarditis (CIED-IE). Cardiac computed tomography angiography imaging is useful in PVE cases with inconclusive TTE and TEE investigations and for the evaluation of paravalvular complications. In the present review, imaging tools are described with their values and limitations for improving diagnosis in NVE, PVE and CIED-IE. Current knowledge about multimodality imaging approaches in IE and imaging methods to assess the local and distant complications of IE is also reviewed. Furthermore, a potential diagnostic work-up for different clinical scenarios is described. However, further studies are essential for refining diagnostic and management approaches in infective endocarditis, addressing limitations and optimizing advanced imaging techniques across different clinical scenarios. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 238 KiB  
Article
Leadless Pacemaker Infection Risk in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections: A Case Series and Literature Review
by Lorenzo Bertolino, Letizia Lucia Florio, Fabian Patauner, Raffaella Gallo, Anna Maria Peluso, Antonio Scafuri, Stefano De Vivo, Carmelina Corrado, Rosa Zampino, Giuseppe Ruocco, Antonio D’Onofrio and Emanuele Durante-Mangoni
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(24), 7573; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12247573 - 8 Dec 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1784
Abstract
(1) Background: Leadless pacemakers (LPs) have been proposed as a reimplantation strategy in pacing-dependent patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) extraction for infection. In this study, we analysed the risk of LP infection when this device is implanted before lead extraction. (2) [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Leadless pacemakers (LPs) have been proposed as a reimplantation strategy in pacing-dependent patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) extraction for infection. In this study, we analysed the risk of LP infection when this device is implanted before lead extraction. (2) Methods: This was a retrospective study including patients who underwent LP implantation between 2017 and 2022. Patients were divided in two groups according to whether LP was implanted following CIED extraction for infection (Group 1) or other indications (Group 2). The primary aim was to describe the risk of LP infection. (3) Results: We included in this study 49 patients with a median age of 81 [20–94] years, mostly males (36, 73%). In Group 1 patients, 17 cases (85%) showed systemic CIED infections, and 11 (55%) had positive lead cultures. Most Group 1 cases (n = 14, 70%) underwent one stage of LP implantation and CIED extraction. Mortality rate during follow-up was 20% (nine patients). Patients were followed up for a median of 927 [41–1925], days and no cases of definite or suspected LP infections were identified. (4) Conclusions: The risk of LP infection was extremely low. LP appears as a potential option for reimplantation in this setting and should be considered in pacing-dependent patients at a high risk of CIED infection recurrence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)
Back to TopTop