Topic Editors

Department of Animal Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
Prof. Dr. Kurt Vogel
Department of Animal and Food Science, University of Wisconsin at River Falls, River Falls, WI 54022, USA

Practical Methods for Accommodating Behavioral Needs and Improving the Wellbeing of Farm Animals: 2nd Edition

Abstract submission deadline
30 September 2025
Manuscript submission deadline
31 December 2025
Viewed by
497

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

Decades of research clearly show that animals that live in a barren environment should have environmental enrichments. When animals are able to engage in natural behaviors, their welfare is improved. The emphasis in this Topic will be on enrichments that are both effective and practical to implement. For example, research has clearly shown that straw is an excellent environmental enrichment for pigs. The problem is that straw is not available in some parts of the world, and it may clog the waste management systems in slatted floor systems. This Topic will include papers on both effective substitutes for straw and the latest information on practical group housing systems for sows.

Another animal welfare concern that is receiving increasing public attention is removing newborn calves from dairy cows. Researchers will be invited to present research on effective methods for keeping calves with dairy cows. In the poultry industry, there has been a rapid evolution of housing systems to replace small battery cages for laying hens. Numerous studies have shown that there are advantages and disadvantages to different types of loose housing systems. Authors will be invited to present information on practical systems that are effective.

This Topic will consist of my introductory paper, authors invited by the editor, and readers who can contribute innovative, practical methods to improve animal wellbeing. This is especially important for farm animals living in intensive systems. Preventing suffering is not sufficient for the best animal welfare. Research clearly shows that animals should have opportunities to engage in positive emotional experiences. Some of the areas that will be covered in this Topic are as follows:

  • Pros and cons of different types of group housing for sows;
  • Dairy calf rearing systems;
  • Grooming brushes for cattle;
  • Devices for enriching intensively raised pigs;
  • Enrichment devices for broiler chickens;
  • Pros and cons of different types of enriched housing for laying hens.

The emphasis in this Topic will be on enrichment methods that will be effective in commercial systems. There is a need for practical methods for both large commercial systems and small-scale farms. This Topic can help provide guidance to the animal welfare officers that are now being hired by many commercial companies.

Prof. Dr. Temple Grandin
Prof. Dr. Kurt Vogel
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • animal welfare
  • environmental enrichment
  • cattle
  • pigs
  • poultry
  • broilers
  • laying hens
  • calves
  • behavior

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Agriculture
agriculture
3.3 4.9 2011 19.2 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Dairy
dairy
- 4.4 2020 27.8 Days CHF 1200 Submit
Poultry
poultry
- - 2022 28.8 Days CHF 1000 Submit
Veterinary Sciences
vetsci
2.0 2.9 2014 21.2 Days CHF 2100 Submit
Animals
animals
2.7 4.9 2011 16.1 Days CHF 2400 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidisciplinary platform offering a preprint service designed to facilitate the early sharing of your research. It supports and empowers your research journey from the very beginning.

MDPI Topics is collaborating with Preprints.org and has established a direct connection between MDPI journals and the platform. Authors are encouraged to take advantage of this opportunity by posting their preprints at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Share your research immediately: disseminate your ideas prior to publication and establish priority for your work.
  2. Safeguard your intellectual contribution: Protect your ideas with a time-stamped preprint that serves as proof of your research timeline.
  3. Boost visibility and impact: Increase the reach and influence of your research by making it accessible to a global audience.
  4. Gain early feedback: Receive valuable input and insights from peers before submitting to a journal.
  5. Ensure broad indexing: Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 1047 KiB  
Article
Effects of Forage-to-Concentrate Ratio on Abnormal Stereotypic Behavior in Lambs and Goat Kids
by Cemil Tölü
Animals 2025, 15(7), 963; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15070963 - 27 Mar 2025
Viewed by 193
Abstract
A crucial component of small ruminant production, particularly where intensive systems are becoming more prevalent, is determining the forage-to-concentrate (F:C) ratio in their daily diets. The effects of the F:C ratio in lambs and goat kids’ daily diets on growth, stereotypical behavior, and [...] Read more.
A crucial component of small ruminant production, particularly where intensive systems are becoming more prevalent, is determining the forage-to-concentrate (F:C) ratio in their daily diets. The effects of the F:C ratio in lambs and goat kids’ daily diets on growth, stereotypical behavior, and blood biochemical parameters were investigated. Eighteen Tahirova sheep lambs and 18 Turkish Saanen goat kids were used, divided into three groups using the following F:C ratios: 20:80, 60:40, and 80:20. Growth rates, weight gains, and feed conversion ratios were determined. Urea nitrogen, glucose, non-esterified fatty acids, creatine kinase, and cortisol hormones were measured in blood samples. In lambs, growth remained consistent across F:C groups. In goat kids, however, the 20:80 group showed superior growth and weight gain. Based on the F:C ratios, behavioral differences were found in forage feeding, rumination, water consumption, and standing activities. Similarly, the 20:80 group displayed higher rates of bar biting, crib biting, and wool biting in lambs, as well as bar biting, crib biting, bucket biting, and chain chewing in goat kids. Cortisol levels were significantly higher in the 80:20 group than in the 20:80 group for both species. Insufficient forage can cause abnormal stereotypical behaviors, which negatively impact animal welfare. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop