Next Article in Journal
Fusarium and Sarocladium Species Associated with Rice Sheath Rot Disease in Sub-Saharan Africa
Previous Article in Journal
Microbial Diversity in Bee Species and Bee Products: Pseudomonads Contribution to Bee Well-Being and the Biological Activity Exerted by Honey Bee Products: A Narrative Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Non-Native Marine Macroalgae of the Azores: An Updated Inventory

1
Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of the Azores, 9500-321 Ponta Delgada, Portugal
2
BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO—Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal
3
Southwest Iceland Nature Research Centre, 245 Suðurnesjabær, Iceland
4
Department of Biology, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504-3602, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2023, 15(10), 1089; https://doi.org/10.3390/d15101089
Submission received: 6 September 2023 / Revised: 10 October 2023 / Accepted: 13 October 2023 / Published: 17 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Topic Biodiversity in the Azores: A Whole Biota Assessment)

Abstract

:
Non-native species (NNS) represent a threat to biodiversity, and their occurrence and distribution should be periodically updated and made easily available to researchers and policymakers. An updated inventory of macroalgal NNS currently present in the Azores was produced based on published reports. Data concerning the first report and the distribution in the archipelago are provided for each species, as well as their respective native ranges and possible vectors of introduction. The resulting list comprises 42 taxa, i.e., 8.05% of the marine flora presently reported in the Azores, with 16 new NNS recorded over the last decade. The most isolated islands of the Western Group presented lower numbers of NNS (4.25% and 6.25%). In contrast, the two islands with the most used marina for transatlantic recreational sailing presented higher numbers (12.90% and 16.87%). Shipping is the main introduction vector (68%), whereas most macroalgal NNS are originally from the Pacific Ocean (31%) and the Indo-Pacific (31%). The presence of 13 species is restricted to single islands, and no species is reported exclusively in the Western group. Asparagopsis armata is the only algal NNS reported from all islands of the Azores. Future work is proposed to support policymaking.

1. Introduction

The presence of Non-Native Species (NNS), i.e., taxa that are introduced or facilitated by human activities to a given area, is considered one of the major threats to global biodiversity, the economy, and public health [1,2]. Since algae have an important role in the marine ecosystem, an algal invasion changes key characteristics such as community abundance, resource allocation, nutrient acquisition rates, and competition mechanisms [2]. Research and policy activities related to NNS require that current and historical data, including species status, introduction pathway, and degree of establishment, are accessible and useful [3].
The Azores is a remote archipelago in the North Atlantic, comprising nine main volcanic islands and several islets, separated into three groups (Figure 1). These islands have a relatively recent origin and are spread over 500 km from east to west [4]. The warm Gulf Stream, acting as a thermal buffer, contributes to the moderate sea water temperatures in the Azores, which in turn influences its climate [5]. Despite its high latitude, the archipelago’s climate is subtropical, with moderate temperatures, low insolation rates, regular and abundant rainfall, and vigorous winds [6]. The marine flora of the Azores presents connections with subtropical and tropical Atlantic America [7] but mainly with the Eastern Atlantic, the Mediterranean, and other Macaronesian islands [8].
In 2006, Cardigos et al. [9] reported 33 introduced species (12 macroalgae and 21 invertebrates) in the first inventory of non-native species in the Azores. Later, updated inventories were published (e.g., [10,11]), as well as other isolated reports (e.g., [12,13,14]). Castro et al. [11] registered 66 NNS in the Azores, 22 of which are macroalgal species, the most representative group of the archipelago. In fact, the Azores were reported to have double the global ratio of non-native macroalgal species [10]. Hence, this archipelago poses as a crossroad for native species distribution [15] but also for non-native species introductions [11].
The current study aims to produce an updated inventory of the non-native macroalgal species reported for the Azores and their respective introduction histories based on data from the literature. The updated list increases the number of macroalgal NNS reported for the archipelago, corrects taxonomic changes or conflicts, and amends previously reported distributions, representing a support tool for research and policymaking.

2. Materials and Methods

The study area comprises the nine Azorean islands and Formigas islets (Figure 1), here included due to the relevance of the marine flora found in their shallow banks [16]. The present inventory includes alien, non-indigenous, introduced, and non-native species, i.e., species currently present but with native distribution ranges other than the Azores, reported in published scientific articles, monitoring programs, technical reports, and Ph.D. theses. Cryptogenic species, i.e., those whose statues that are not clearly native or non-native [9,10], and those classified with uncertain status [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24] in the archipelago, were not included. The criteria used by the mentioned authors to classify the species as non-native were not evaluated; therefore, their statuses are based on the reported data. Nevertheless, a few decisions were made regarding conflicting reports: 1—Asparagopsis taxiformis is kept as an NNS despite the suggestion of Neto et al. (2021) to change its status to native, and this study agrees with other publications based on distributional and molecular data (e.g., [10,11,25]); 2—Antithamnion nipponicum and Corynomorpha prismatica were reincluded in the NNS list since Castro et al. [11] based their removal only on their sporadicity; 3—records of Lophocladia trichocladus were removed from Faial, Codium fragile from Graciosa, Asparagopsis taxiformis from São Jorge and Corvo, and Grateloupia turuturu (reported as G. filicina) from Santa Maria, Graciosa, Terceira, São Jorge, and Flores, after verification of the references given by Castro et al. [11]. The conservative aspect of such decisions is based on the confirmation of species identifications during the exhaustive works of Neto et al. [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Scytosiphon dotyi, for example, was collected twice in 30 years, with a 15-year gap [26]; Antithamnionella ternifolia remained a single record for 17 years [10], with multiple specimens found afterwards [24,27]. Native distribution of macroalgal NNS and possible vectors are given as reported by each respective author.
The framework, taxonomy, nomenclature, and authorities in this checklist are built upon the current synthesis of taxa in AlgaeBase [28]. It is beyond the scope of this paper to provide a rigorous assessment of the misapplication of species and genus names reported for the Azores without a critical examination of the macroalgal vouchers from the region.
For statistical purposes, native distribution was grouped as Pacific Ocean, Western Pacific, Northwestern Pacific, Indo-Pacific, Indian Ocean, Northeastern Atlantic, and Western Atlantic. Hull fouling and ballast water were grouped as ‘shipping’, while aquaculture/aquarium were grouped as ‘escape from confinement’. Natural dispersal mechanisms such as rafting were not considered when analyzing the introduction vectors. When the first report of a species is given as a period of years, only the first year is considered.

3. Results

3.1. Species Invetory

The resulting list comprises a total of 42 non-native macroalgal species (8.05% of the Azorean marine flora of 522 taxa), with the correction of previously reported distributional ranges based on taxonomy and the literature review (Table 1, Supplementary Material File S1).

3.2. Species Composition

The updated list is composed of (Figure 2a):
  • Five brown algae (5% of the Ochrophyta reported in the Azores);
  • Thirty-three red algae (9% of the Rhodophyta reported in the Azores);
  • Four green algae (5% of the Chlorophyta reported in the Azores);
  • Therefore, 12% of the non-native macroalgal species belong to the Ochrophyta, 79% to the Rhodophyta, and 9% to the Chlorophyta.
Within the three macroalgal Phylla, the most represented orders are (Table 1):
  • Four of the five (80%) Ochrophyta species belong to the Ectocarpales, characterized by isomorphic gametophyte and sporophyte composed of uniseriate, branched, or unbranched filaments [28];
  • 25 of the 33 (76%) Rhodophyta species belong to the Ceramiales, an order characterized by isomorphic gametophyte and sporophyte of widely varying morphology of uniaxial structure [28];
  • All four (100%) Chlorophyta species belong to the Bryopsidales, an order characterized by simple to complex siphonous thalli [28].

3.3. Non-Native Species Distribution

3.3.1. General Distribution

All islands host non-native macroalgal species, with the following percentage in relation to the reported marine flora (Figure 2b):
  • Formigas, São Miguel, Santa Maria, Terceira, Graciosa, and Pico present similar percentage of NNS (8.44–9.74%);
  • The most isolated islands in the Western Group (Flores and Corvo) present lower percentages of NNS (6.25% and 4.25%, respectively);
  • The islands with the most used marina for transatlantic recreational sailing (São Jorge and Faial) present higher percentages of NNS (12.90% and 16.87%, respectively).

3.3.2. Specific Distribution (Maps in Supplementary Material File S2)

The presence of 13 species is restricted to single islands, namely:
  • Antithamnionella elegans, Antithamnionella ternifolia, Corynomorpha prismatica, Grallatoria reptans, and Gymnophycus hapsiphorus in São Miguel;
  • Acrothamnion preissii, Halimeda incrassata, and Scinaia acuta in Santa Maria;
  • Hypoglossum heterocystideum in Graciosa;
  • Antithamnion densum in Pico;
  • Antithamnion nipponicum and Caulerpa webbiana in Faial.
The distribution of six species is restricted to the different Groups of islands, namely:
  • Antithamnion hubbsii, Lophocladia trichoclados, and Scytosiphon dotyi in the Eastern Group;
  • Aglaothamnion cordatum, Laurencia chondrioides, and Laurencia minuta in the Central Group;
  • No species is exclusively found in the Western Group.
Asparagopsis armata is the only species reported from all islands of the archipelago.

3.4. Species Introduction

3.4.1. Native Range

The original distributional ranges of the non-native macroalgal species of the Azores are (Figure 3a):
  • 7% from the Pacific Ocean, 7% from the Western Pacific, and 17% from the Northwestern Pacific;
  • 31% from the Indo-Pacific;
  • 17% from the Indian Ocean;
  • 2% from the Northeastern Atlantic, and 19% from the Western Atlantic.

3.4.2. Introduction Vectors

The possible vectors of introduction (based on published reports) for the non-native macroalgal species in the Azores are (Figure 3b):
  • 68% from shipping, i.e., through hull fouling or ballast water;
  • 5% due to escape from confinement, i.e., from aquarium or aquaculture;
  • 27% unknown.

3.4.3. History of First Reports

The cumulative number of non-native macroalgal species shows the following trend (Figure 4):
  • First NNS reported in 1928;
  • First surge of NNS reports in the late 1980s;
  • Second surge of NNS reports in the mid-2000s;
  • Steady increase in the number of NNS reports in the last 15 years.

4. Discussion

The list of non-native macroalgal species in the Azores is here increased to 42 species, 20 more species than in the last inventory by Castro et al. [11]. This expansion includes the reintroduction of species previously recorded by Micael et al. [10] as well as additional species reported as non-native by other authors in the last five years (e.g., [12,13,14,21,24]). Since the extensive study by Micael et al. [10], the known marine flora from the Azores encompasses 83 more species (439 to 522, [26]), including 16 more NNS. Nevertheless, the newly reported macroalgal NNS increases the ratio that Micael et al. [10] reported from 6 to 8% of the Azorean marine flora, rising from double the global percentage (3%) to almost triple.
The ratio of non-native species belonging to Rhodophyta has also increased from that reported by Micael et al. [10], namely from 65 to 79%, and is now higher than the global pattern [60]. As discussed by Micael et al. [61], red algae appear to be particularly efficient in introduction and invasive events. Their success can be attributed to the combination of various factors, including: 1—the ability to reproduce by fragmentation, increasing the potential pool of propagules [62]; 2—the ability to use the entire light spectrum, enabling them to establish in shadow environments [63]; and 3—their high bromophenol content which might help to deter predators [64].
Despite the low representation of the Chlorophyta in the present inventory, all the green algae reported as NNS in the Azores belong to the Bryopsidales. Members of this order present rapid growth from fragmented thalli (e.g., [65]), and many taxa became invasive out of their native range (e.g., [66]). In fact, Caulerpa webbiana was classified as one of the species to be prioritized for monitoring and eradication measures in the Azores [67].
Likewise, although only five species of brown algae are reported in the updated inventory, it includes Rugulopteryx okamurae, an extremely invasive species with high propagation capacity [68] This species has caused major impacts in communities where it has invaded (e.g., [69]), and has quickly made its way to the European list of invasive non-native species [70]. R. okamurae is also the only macroalga with specific legislation for its monitorization and control in the Azores [71].
The ratio of non-native macroalgal species with native distribution in the Pacific Ocean (31%) and the Indo-Pacific (31%) remains equal to those reported by Micael et al. [10], even with the now increased number of NNS (from 26 to 42 species). Instead, the ratio of species from the Indian Ocean decreased (23% to 17%), and the ratio from the Atlantic Ocean increased (15% to 21%). The main difference is the increase in species from the Western Atlantic (11% to 19%), a trend also observed in other Macaronesian archipelagos, namely Madeira (e.g., [72]) and the Canary Islands (e.g., [73]). NNS originally distributed in the Atlantic Ocean might include species that reached the archipelago by rafting in the dominant Atlantic currents, with their subsequent establishment facilitated by the increase in seawater temperatures [13,72]. Although not directly introduced by human activities, the growing accumulation of marine litter facilitates new introductions by offering new habitats for drifting macroalgae [74].
The updated distribution of non-native macroalgal species in the Azores shows that previously reported species [9,10] have spread to other islands. This rise is probably due to further transport between harbors and marinas but may also result from additional efforts to identify non-native species [75].
No experimental or empirical evidence of introduction vectors for the non-native macroalgal species currently found in the Azores has been found. Nevertheless, different authors reporting on those species suggested possible vectors for their introductions (see detailed reports in Section 3.1). Transport via shipping is the most representative possible vector, which probably contributed to 68% of the non-native macroalgal species reported. This ratio is similar to that reported by Micael et al. [10], even though those authors studied fewer species than the present work. This possible ratio is higher than that reported for marine species in other European waters [76], mostly due to the low representation of other vectors (such as artificial channels and aquaculture). The introduction vector of 27% of the NNS currently present in the Azores is still unknown, and further studies are necessary to identify other possible existing vectors.
Although studies of the marine flora of the Azores started in 1844 [77], the first record of a non-native macroalgal species dates from 1928 [39]. This date coincides with the second wave of marine species introductions that happened at the beginning of the 20th century, associated with the increase in maritime traffic [78]. Two surges in first reports of NNS were observed in this study and coincided with increased sampling efforts in the Azores. In the late 1980s, the Biology Department of the University of the Azores organized various scientific expeditions (Graciosa/88, Faial e Pico/89, Flores e Corvo/89, Santa Maria e Formiga/90), which resulted in the report of nine new NNS. Furthermore, 11 NNS were newly reported after the expeditions conducted by the Marine Biology Section of the University of the Azores between 2005 and 2008 (PARQMAR/2005, PADEL/2006, PICOBEL/2007, TAPES/2007, CAMAG-ORI/2008, CAMAG-TER/2008). Since the publication of the European Union Marine Strategy Framework Directive [79], which included the level of NNS introduced by human activities as a qualitative descriptor, new records of non-native macroalgal species have been steadily reported.
Further taxonomic work is necessary to correct possible misidentifications in previous reports (e.g., [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]). Consequently, many species names may not be accurate because the taxonomic concepts of previous reports were based mostly on morphological similarities without comparative molecular systematics (with a few exceptions such as [13,14]). Species distribution in the Azores might also be underrepresented, especially in islands where sampling is sporadic [22] or in habitats not specifically investigated [26]. Therefore, further investigation is still needed. Additionally, the invasiveness risk of NNS should be assessed to support policymakers [80,81] in preventing, minimizing, or mitigating their impact in a cost-efficient manner [76].
Nevertheless, this list contributes to estimating the presence of non-native species throughout the Azores, providing updated and accessible data for invasiveness risk assessments and subsequent policymaking [3].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/d15101089/s1, Supplementary Material File S1: List of non-native species of marine macroalgae reported to the Azores, with the respective native distribution, possible introduction vector to the Azores, distribution per island, and year of first report in the Archipelago; Supplementary Material File S2: Distribution maps of non-native macroalgal species in the Azores.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.G. and S.F.; data curation, D.G. and A.I.F.; formal analysis, D.G. and J.M.; funding acquisition, D.G.; investigation, D.G. and A.I.F.; writing—original draft preparation, D.G., A.I.F., J.M. and S.F.; writing—review and editing, D.G., J.M. and S.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Programa Operacional AÇORES 2020, grant number ACORES-01-0145-FEDER-000091 (85% by the European Regional Development Fund and 15% by funds from the Autonomous Region of the Azores), DG is supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, grant number DL57/2016/CP1440/CT0025, CIBIO is maintained by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, grant number UIDB/50027/2020.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in Supplementary Material File S1.

Acknowledgments

The present work was generated in the context of the Project CRYPTO–Molecular Identification of Cryptogenic Macroalgae with Invasive Potential in the Azores, with administrative support of Fundação Gaspar Frutuoso. The authors would like to thank António Medeiros for providing the map of the study area and Joana Vilaverde for contributing to earlier versions of the distribution maps. We also thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. UN. The Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020 and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets; Document UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/X/2; Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity: Nagoya, Japan, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. Li, H.; Geng, Y.; Shi, H.; Wu, C.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Chen, L.; Xing, R. Biological Mechanisms of Invasive Algae and Meta-Analysis of Ecological Impacts on Local Communities of Marine Organisms. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 146, 109763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Groom, Q.J.; Adriaens, T.; Desmet, P.; Simpson, A.; De Wever, A.; Bazos, I.; Cardoso, A.C.; Charles, L.; Christopoulou, A.; Gazda, A.; et al. Seven Recommendations to Make Your Invasive Alien Species Data More Useful. Front. Appl. Math. Stat. 2017, 3, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. León-Cisneros, K.; Tittley, I.; Terra, M.R.; Nogueira, E.M.; Neto, A.I. The Marine Algal (Seaweed) Flora of the Azores: 4, Further Additions. Arquipel. Life Mar. Sci. 2012, 29, 25–32. [Google Scholar]
  5. Meirelles, M.; Carvalho, F.; Porteiro, J.; Henriques, D.; Navarro, P.; Vasconcelos, H. Climate Change and Impact on Renewable Energies in the Azores Strategic Visions for Sustainability. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Brito de Azevedo, E.; Rodrigues, M.; Fernandes, J. O Clima Dos Açores. In Atlas Básico dos Açores; Forjaz, V.H., Ed.; Observatório Vulcanológico e Geotérmico dos Açores: Ponta Delgada, Portugal, 2004; pp. 25–48. ISBN 9729746648. [Google Scholar]
  7. Tittley, I.; Neto, A.I. The Marine Algal (Seaweed) Flora of the Azores: Additions and Amendments. Bot. Mar. 2005, 48, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Freitas, R.; Romeiras, M.; Silva, L.; Cordeiro, R.; Madeira, P.; González, J.A.; Wirtz, P.; Falcón, J.M.; Brito, A.; Floeter, S.R.; et al. Restructuring of the ‘Macaronesia’ Biogeographic Unit: A Marine Multi-Taxon Biogeographical Approach. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 15792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cardigos, F.; Tempera, F.; Ávila, S.; Gonçalves, J.; Colaço, A.; Santos, R.S. Non-Indigenous Marine Species of the Azores. Helgol. Mar. Res. 2006, 60, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Micael, J.; Parente, M.I.; Costa, A.C. Tracking Macroalgae Introductions in North Atlantic Oceanic Islands. Helgol. Mar. Res. 2014, 68, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Castro, N.; Carlton, J.T.; Costa, A.C.; Marques, C.S.; Hewitt, C.L.; Cacabelos, E.; Lopes, E.; Gizzi, F.; Gestoso, I.; Monteiro, J.G.; et al. Diversity and Patterns of Marine Non-native Species in the Archipelagos of Macaronesia. Divers. Distrib. 2022, 28, 667–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Parente, M.I.; Gabriel, D.; Micael, J.; Botelho, A.Z.; Ballesteros, E.; Milla, D.; dos Santos, R.; Costa, A.C. First Report of the Invasive Macroalga Acrothamnion preissii (Rhodophyta, Ceramiales) in the Atlantic Ocean. Bot. Mar. 2018, 61, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cacabelos, E.; Faria, J.; Martins, G.M.; Mir, C.; Parente, M.I.; Gabriel, D.; Sánchez, R.; Altamirano, M.; Costa, A.C.; Prud’homme van Reine, W.; et al. First Record of Caulerpa prolifera in the Azores (NE Atlantic). Bot. Mar. 2019, 62, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Faria, J.; Prestes, A.C.L.; Moreu, I.; Martins, G.M.; Neto, A.I.; Cacabelos, E. Arrival and Proliferation of the Invasive Seaweed Rugulopteryx okamurae in NE Atlantic Islands. Bot. Mar. 2022, 65, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tittley, I.; Neto, A.I. The Marine Algal Flora of the Azores: Island Isolation or Atlantic Stepping-Stones? Occas. Publ. Ir. Biogeogr. Soc. 2006, 9, 40–54. [Google Scholar]
  16. Neto, A.I.; Prestes, A.C.L.; Azevedo, J.M.N.; Resendes, R.; Álvaro, N.; Neto, R.M.A.; Moreu, I. Marine Algal Flora of Formigas Islets, Azores. Biodivers. Data J. 2020, 8, e57510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Neto, A.I.; Prestes, A.C.L.; Resendes, R.; Neto, R.M.A.; Moreu, I. Marine Algal (Seaweed) Flora of Faial Island, Azores. 2020. Sampling Event Dataset. Available online: https://doi.org/10.15468/jnkr5k (accessed on 9 June 2023).
  18. Neto, A.I.; Prestes, A.C.L.; Resendes, R.; Neto, R.M.A.; Moreu, I. Marine Algal (Seaweed) Flora of São Jorge Island, Azores. 2020. Available online: https://doi.org/10.15468/93phf6 (accessed on 9 June 2023).
  19. Neto, A.I.; Prestes, A.C.L.; Álvaro, N.; Resendes, R.; Neto, R.M.A.; Moreu, I. Marine Algal (Seaweed) Flora of Terceira Island, Azores. Biodivers. Data J. 2020, 8, e57462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Neto, A.I.; Prestes, A.C.L.; Álvaro, N.; Resendes, R.; Neto, R.M.A.; Tittley, I.; Moreu, I. Marine Algal Flora of Pico Island, Azores. Biodivers. Data J. 2020, 8, e57461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Neto, A.I.; Parente, M.I.; Botelho, A.Z.; Prestes, A.C.L.; Resendes, R.; Afonso, P.; Álvaro, N.V.; Milla-Figueras, D.; Neto, R.M.A.; Tittley, I.; et al. Marine Algal Flora of Graciosa Island, Azores. Biodivers. Data J. 2020, 8, e57201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Neto, A.I.; Parente, M.; Cacabelos, E.; Costa, A.; Botelho, A.; Ballesteros, E.; Monteiro, S.; Resendes, R.; Afonso, P.; Prestes, A.; et al. Marine Algal Flora of Santa Maria Island, Azores. Biodivers. Data J. 2021, 9, e61909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Neto, A.I.; Parente, M.; Tittley, I.; Fletcher, R.; Farnham, W.; Costa, A.; Botelho, A.; Monteiro, S.; Resendes, R.; Afonso, P.; et al. Marine Algal Flora of Flores and Corvo Islands, Azores. Biodivers. Data J. 2021, 9, e60929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Neto, A.I.; Moreu, I.; Rosas Alquicira, E.; León-Cisneros, K.; Cacabelos, E.; Botelho, A.; Micael, J.; Costa, A.; Neto, R.; Azevedo, J.; et al. Marine Algal Flora of São Miguel Island, Azores. Biodivers. Data J. 2021, 9, e64969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Santos, R.; Ferreira, A.; Micael, J.; Gil-Rodríguez, M.C.; Machín, M.; Costa, A.C.; Gabriel, D.; Costa, F.O.; Parente, M.I. Genetic Characterization of the Red Algae Asparagopsis armata and Asparagopsis taxiformis (Bonnemaisoniaceae) from the Azores. Genome 2015, 58, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Neto, A.I.; Cacabelos, E.; Prestes, A.C.L.; Díaz-Tapia, P.; Moreu, I. New Records of Marine Macroalgae for the Azores. Bot. Mar. 2022, 65, 105–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vaz-Pinto, F.; Torrontegi, O.; Prestes, A.C.L.; Álvaro, N.V.; Neto, A.I.; Martins, G.M. Invasion Success and Development of Benthic Assemblages: Effect of Timing, Duration of Submersion and Substrate Type. Mar. Environ. Res. 2014, 94, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Guiry, M.D.; Guiry, G.M. AlgaeBase. World-Wide Electronic Publication. National University of Ireland, Galway. 2023. Available online: http://www.algaebase.org (accessed on 9 June 2023).
  29. Tittley, I.; Neto, A.I.; Parente, M.I. The Marine Algal (Seaweed) Flora of the Azores: Additions and Amendments 3. Bot. Mar. 2009, 52, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Botelho, A.Z.; Dionísio, M.A.; Cunha, A.; Monteiro, S.; Geraldes, D.; Hipólito, C.; Parente, M.; Angélico, M.M.; Costa, A.C. Contributo Para a Inventariação da Biodiversidade Marinha da ilha de Santa Maria; Relatórios e Comunicações do Departamento de Biologia da Universidade dos Açores 36; Universidade dos Açores: Ponta Delgada, Protugal, 2009; pp. 75–87. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wallenstein, F. Rocky Shore Macroalgae Communities of the Azores (Portugal) and the British Isles: A Comparison for the Development of Ecological Quality Assessment Tool. Ph.D. Thesis, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  32. Neto, A.I.d.M.A. Studies on Algal Communities of São Miguel, Azores. Ph.D. Thesis, University of the Azores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  33. Parente, M.I.; Neto, A.I.; Fletcher, R.L. Morphology and Life History Studies of Endarachne binghamiae (Scytosiphonaceae, Phaeophyta) from the Azores. Aquat. Bot. 2003, 76, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tittley, I.; Neto, A.I. “Expedition Azores 1989”: Benthic Marine Algae (Seaweeds) Recorded from Faial and Pico. Archipélago. Life Mar. Sci. 1994, 12, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  35. Verlaque, M.; Ruitton, S.; Mineur, F.; Boudouresque, C.F. CIESM Atlas of Exotic Macrophytes in the Mediterranean Sea. Rapp. Comm. Int. Mer. Médit. 2007, 38, 14. [Google Scholar]
  36. ICES. Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO); ICES Scientific Reports; ICES: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2022; Volume 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. León-Cisneros, K.; Riosmena-Rodríguez, R.; Neto, A.I. A Re-Evaluation of Scinaia (Nemaliales, Rhodophyta) in the Azores. Helgol. Mar. Res. 2011, 65, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Neto, A.I. Algas Marinhas do Litoral da Ilha Graciosa. Graciosa/88, Relatório Preliminar; Relatórios e Comunicações do Departamento de Biologia da Universidade dos Açores 17; Universidade dos Açores: Ponta Delgada, Protugal, 1989; pp. 61–65. [Google Scholar]
  39. Schmidt, O.C. Beitrage Zur Kenntnis Der Meeresalgen Der Azoren II. Hedwigia 1929, 69, 165–172. [Google Scholar]
  40. Torres, P.; Lopes, C.; Dionísio, M.A.; Costa, A.C. Espécies Exóticas Invasoras Marinhas da Ilha de Santa Maria, Açores; Relatórios e Comunicações do Departamento de Biologia da Universidade dos Açores 36; Universidade dos Açores: Ponta Delgada, Protugal, 2010; pp. 103–111. [Google Scholar]
  41. Dionísio, M.A.; Micael, J.; Parente, M.I.; Norberto, R.; Cunha, A.; Brum, J.M.M.; Cunha, L.; Lopes, C.; Monteiro, S.; Palmero, A.M.; et al. Contributo Para o Conhecimento da Biodiversidade Marinha da Ilha das Flores; Relatórios e Comunicações do Departamento de Biologia da Universidade dos Açores 35; Universidade dos Açores: Ponta Delgada, Protugal, 2008; pp. 65–84. [Google Scholar]
  42. Neto, A.I. Checklist of the Benthic Marine Macroalgae of the Azores. Arquipel. Life Mar. Sci. 1994, 12A, 15–34. [Google Scholar]
  43. Athanasiadis, A.; Tittley, I. Antithamnioid Algae (Rhodophyta, Ceramiaceae) Newly Recorded from the Azores. Phycologia 1994, 33, 77–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. EC. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, European Alien Species Information Network (EASIN). 2023. Available online: https://easin.jrc.ec.europa.eu (accessed on 9 June 2023).
  45. Marchini, A.; Ferrario, J.; Sfriso, A.; Occhipinti-Ambrogi, A. Current Status and Trends of Biological Invasions in the Lagoon of Venice, a Hotspot of Marine NIS Introductions in the Mediterranean Sea. Biol. Invasions 2015, 17, 2943–2962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Castro, M.L.; Viegas, M.C. Contribuição Para o Estudo da Zona Intertidal (Substrato Rochoso) da Ilha de São Miguel-Açores. Fácies de Corallina elongata Ellis & Solander. Resultados Preliminares. Cuad. Marisq. 1987, 11, 59–69. [Google Scholar]
  47. Golo, R.; Vergés, A.; Díaz-Tapia, P.; Cebrian, E. Implications of Taxonomic Misidentification for Future Invasion Predictions: Evidence from One of the Most Harmful Invasive Marine Algae. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2023, 191, 114970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. ICES. Interim Report of the Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO); Document CM 2018/HAPISG; ICES: Madeira, Portugal, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ardré, F.; Bouderesque, C.; Cabioch, J. Présence Remarquable Du Symphyocladia marchantioides (Harvey) Falkenberg (Rhodomélacées, Céramiales) Aux Açores. Bull. Soc. Phycol. Fr. 1974, 19, 178–182. [Google Scholar]
  50. Fralick, R.A.; Hehre, E.; Mathieson, A. Observations on the Marine Algal Flora of the Azores I: Notes of the Epizoic Algae Occurring on the Marine Molluscs Patella spp. Arquipel. Life Mar. Sci 1985, 6, 39–43. [Google Scholar]
  51. Díaz-Tapia, P.; Maggs, C.A.; Macaya, E.C.; Verbruggen, H. Widely Distributed Red Algae Often Represent Hidden Introductions, Complexes of Cryptic Species or Species with Strong Phylogeographic Structure. J. Phycol. 2018, 54, 829–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Fredericq, S.; Serrão, E.; Norris, J. New Records of Marine Red Algae from the Azores. Arquipel. Life Mar. Sci. 1992, 10, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  53. Cardigos, F.; Tempera, F.; Fontes, J.; Ribeiro, P.; Sala, I.; Caldeira, R.; Santos, R.S. Relatório Sobre a Presença de Uma Nova Espécie No Norte da Ilha do Faial; Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas da Universidade dos Açores: Horta, Portugal, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  54. Amat, J.N. The Recent Northern Introduction of the Seaweed Caulerpa webbiana (Caulerpales, Chlorophyta) in Faial, Azores Islands (North-Eastern Atlantic). Aquat. Invasions 2008, 3, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Alós, J.; Tomas, F.; Terrados, J.; Verbruggen, H.; Ballesteros, E. Fast-Spreading Green Beds of Recently Introduced Halimeda incrassata Invade Mallorca Island (NW Mediterranean Sea). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2016, 558, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Goulletquer, P.; Bachelet, G.; Sauriau, P.G. Noel P Open Atlantic Coast of Europe a Century of Introduced Species into French Waters. In Invasive Aquatic Species of Europe. Distribution, Impacts and Management; Leppäkoski, E., Gollasch, S., Olenin, S., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2002; pp. 276–290. ISBN 978-90-481-6111-9. [Google Scholar]
  57. Gavio, B.; Fredericq, S. Grateloupia turuturu (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta) Is the Correct Name of the Non-Native Species in the Atlantic Known as Grateloupia doryphora. Eur. J. Phycol. 2002, 37, 349–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gain, L. Algues Provenant Des Campagnes de l’Hirondelle II (1911–1912). Bull. L’Institut Océanogr. Monaco 1914, 279, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  59. Wilkes, R.J.; McIvor, L.M.; Guiry, M.D. Using RbcL Sequence Data to Reassess the Taxonomic Position of Some Grateloupia and Dermocorynus Species (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta) from the North-Eastern Atlantic. Eur. J. Phycol. 2005, 40, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Guiry, M.D. How Many Species of Algae Are There? J. Phycol. 2012, 48, 1057–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Micael, J.; Rodrigues, P.; Gíslason, S. Native vs. Non-Indigenous Macroalgae in Iceland: The State of Knowledge. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2021, 47, 101944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Williams, S.L.; Smith, J.E. A Global Review of the Distribution, Taxonomy, and Impacts of Introduced Seaweeds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2007, 38, 327–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hoffman, R.; Dubinsky, Z. Invasive and Alien Rhodophyta in the Mediterranean and along the Israeli Shores. In Red Algae in the Genomic Age; Seckbach, J., Chapman, D.J., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 45–60. ISBN 978-90-481-3794-7. [Google Scholar]
  64. Maggs, C.A.; Stegenga, H. Red Algal Exotics on North Sea Coasts. Helgol. Mar. Res. 1998, 52, 243–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. González, A.V.; Beltrán, J.; Santelices, B. Colonisation and Growth Strategies in Two Codium Species (Bryopsidales, Chlorophyta) with Different Thallus Forms. Phycologia 2014, 53, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sauvage, T.; Payri, C.; Draisma, S.G.A.; van Reine, W.F.P.; Verbruggen, H.; Belton, G.S.; Gurgel, C.F.D.; Gabriel, D.; Sherwood, A.R.; Fredericq, S. Molecular Diversity of the Caulerpa racemosaCaulerpa peltata Complex (Caulerpaceae, Bryopsidales) in New Caledonia, with New Australasian Records for C. racemosa var. cylindracea. Phycologia 2013, 52, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. RAA Resolução n.o 15/2012/A da Assembleia Legislativa da Região Autónoma dos Açores de 2 de Abril de 2012. Regime Jurídico da Conservação da Natureza e da Proteção da Biodiversidade. Diário da República. 2012, pp. 1625–1713. Available online: https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/decreto-legislativo-regional/15-2012-553893 (accessed on 9 June 2023).
  68. García-Gómez, J.C.; Sempere-Valverde, J.; González, A.R.; Martínez-Chacón, M.; Olaya-Ponzone, L.; Sánchez-Moyano, E.; Ostalé-Valriberas, E.; Megina, C. From Exotic to Invasive in Record Time: The Extreme Impact of Rugulopteryx okamurae (Dictyotales, Ochrophyta) in the Strait of Gibraltar. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 704, 135408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Faria, J.; Prestes, A.C.L.; Moreu, I.; Cacabelos, E.; Martins, G.M. Dramatic Changes in the Structure of Shallow-Water Marine Benthic Communities Following the Invasion by Rugulopteryx okamurae (Dictyotales, Ochrophyta) in Azores (NE Atlantic). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2022, 175, 113358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. EC European Commission Implementing Regulation 2022/1203 of 12 July 2022. Amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1141 to Update the List of Invasive Alien Species of Union Concern. Off. J. Eur. Union 2022, 186, 10–13.
  71. RAA Resolução n.o 33/2022/A da Assembleia Legislativa da Região Autónoma dos Açores de 10 de Outubro de 2022 Número 195. Implemen-Tação Urgente de Medidas Para Combater o Impacto da Alga Rugulopteryx okamurae nos Ecossistemas Marinhos. Diário da República. 2022, pp. 5–7. Available online: https://files.dre.pt/gratuitos/1s/2022/10/19500.pdf (accessed on 9 June 2023).
  72. Ribeiro, C.; Sauvage, T.; Ferreira, S.; Haroun, R.; Silva, J.; Neves, P. Crossing the Atlantic: The Tropical Macroalga Caulerpa ashmeadii Harvey 1858 as a Recent Settler in Porto Santo Island (Madeira Archipelago, North-Eastern Atlantic). Aquat. Bot. 2023, 184, 103595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sangil, C.; Martín-García, L.; Afonso-Carrillo, J.; Barquín, J.; Sansón, M. Halimeda incrassata (Bryopsidales, Chlorophyta) Reaches the Canary Islands: Mid- and Deep-Water Meadows in the Eastern Subtropical Atlantic Ocean. Bot. Mar. 2018, 61, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kiessling, T.; Gutow, L. Thiel M Marine Litter as Habitat and Dispersal Vector. In Marine Anthropogenic Litter; Bergmann, M., Gutow, L., Klages, M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 141–181. ISBN 978-3-319-16509-7. [Google Scholar]
  75. Tempesti, J.; Mangano, M.C.; Langeneck, J.; Lardicci, C.; Maltagliati, F.; Castelli, A. Non-Indigenous Species in Mediterranean Ports: A Knowledge Baseline. Mar. Environ. Res. 2020, 161, 105056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Tsiamis, K.; Azzurro, E.; Bariche, M.; Çinar, M.E.; Crocetta, F.; De Clerck, O.; Galil, B.; Gómez, F.; Hoffman, R.; Jensen, K.R.; et al. Prioritizing Marine Invasive Alien Species in the European Union through Horizon Scanning. Aquat. Conserv. 2020, 30, 794–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Seubert, M. Flora Azorica; Apud Adolphum Marcum: Bonna, Germany; Hong Kong, China, 1844. [Google Scholar]
  78. Cardigos, F.; Monteiro, J.; Fontes, J.; Parretti, P.; Santos, R.S. Fighting Invasions in the Marine Realm, a Case Study with Caulerpa webbiana in the Azores. In Biological Invasions in Changing Ecosystems; Canning-Clode, J., Ed.; De Gruyter Open: Warsaw, Poland, 2015; pp. 279–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. European Union. EC Directive 56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008. Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Marine Environmental Policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). Off. J. Eur. Union 2008, 164, 19–40. [Google Scholar]
  80. Copp, G.; Vilizzi, L.; Tidbury, H.; Stebbing, P.; Tarkan, A.S.; Miossec, L.; Goulletquer, P. Development of a Generic Decision-Support Tool for Identifying Potentially Invasive Aquatic Taxa: AS-ISK. Manag. Biol. Invasions 2016, 7, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Copp, G.H.; Vilizzi, L.; Wei, H.; Li, S.; Piria, M.; Al-Faisal, A.J.; Almeida, D.; Atique, U.; Al-Wazzan, Z.; Bakiu, R.; et al. Speaking Their Language—Development of a Multilingual Decision-Support Tool for Communicating Invasive Species Risks to Decision Makers and Stakeholders. Environ. Model. Softw. 2021, 135, 104900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The archipelago of the Azores and its location in the North Atlantic (box).
Figure 1. The archipelago of the Azores and its location in the North Atlantic (box).
Diversity 15 01089 g001
Figure 2. Non-native macroalgal species in the Azores: (a) Composition of the Azorean marine flora in relation to the species’ native status and composition of the non-native species (NNS) in relation to the main groups of algae; (b) Number of macroalgal non-native species (NNS) and its percentage in relation to the reported marine flora, for each island of the Azores.
Figure 2. Non-native macroalgal species in the Azores: (a) Composition of the Azorean marine flora in relation to the species’ native status and composition of the non-native species (NNS) in relation to the main groups of algae; (b) Number of macroalgal non-native species (NNS) and its percentage in relation to the reported marine flora, for each island of the Azores.
Diversity 15 01089 g002
Figure 3. Introduction of the non-native macroalgal species in the Azores: (a) Native range of the reported species; (b) Possible vectors of introduction.
Figure 3. Introduction of the non-native macroalgal species in the Azores: (a) Native range of the reported species; (b) Possible vectors of introduction.
Diversity 15 01089 g003
Figure 4. The cumulative number of non-native macroalgal species, according to their year of record in the Azores.
Figure 4. The cumulative number of non-native macroalgal species, according to their year of record in the Azores.
Diversity 15 01089 g004
Table 1. Inventory of the non-native macroalgal species currently reported for the Azores, including the respective native distribution, possible introduction vector to the Azores, distribution per island, and year of first report in the archipelago. Taxa indicated with a “+” denotes additions to the previous inventory listed in Castro et al. [11]. Taxa with distribution restricted to a single island are indicated with “*”. Taxa based on a single record are indicated with “°”.
Table 1. Inventory of the non-native macroalgal species currently reported for the Azores, including the respective native distribution, possible introduction vector to the Azores, distribution per island, and year of first report in the archipelago. Taxa indicated with a “+” denotes additions to the previous inventory listed in Castro et al. [11]. Taxa with distribution restricted to a single island are indicated with “*”. Taxa based on a single record are indicated with “°”.
TaxonNative RangeDistribution in the AzoresPossible VectorFirst Record for the Azores
Phylum Ochrophyta
 Class Phaeophyceae
  Order Dictyotales
   Family Dictyotaceae
Rugulopteryx okamurae +Subtropical to temperate Western Pacific Ocean [14]São Miguel [14]; Faial [14]Ballast waters, Hull fouling [14]2019 [14]
  Order Ectocarpales
   Family Chordariaceae
Papenfussiella kuromo Northwestern Pacific [10]São Miguel [10,11,24,29]; Santa Maria [10,11,22,30]; Terceira [10]; Graciosa [10,11,21,29,31]; Pico [10]; Faial [10,11,29]; Flores [23]Unknown [10]1990 [29]
   Family Scytosiphonaceae
Hydroclathrus tilesii + Pacific Ocean (based on [28])Formigas [16]; Santa Maria [22]; Graciosa [21]; Pico [20]; Faial [17]; Flores [23]Unknown1989 [20]
Petalonia binghamiae Western Pacific [10]São Miguel [9,10,11,24,31,32,33], Terceira [9,10,11,19,31,32]; Graciosa [10,11,21,31]; Pico [9,10,11,20,31,32]; Faial [9,10,11,32,34]Ballast water, Hull fouling [10]1989 [34]
Scytosiphon dotyi + 1Indo-Pacific [35]Formigas [16]; São Miguel [26]Hull fouling [36]1990 [26]
Phylum Rhodophyta
 Class Florideophyceae
  Order Nemaliales
   Family Liagoraceae
Neoizziella divaricata +Indo-Pacific (based on [28])Formigas [16]; São Miguel [24]; Flores [23]Unknown1989 [24]
   Family Scinaiaceae
Scinaia acuta *Australia, New Zealand [11]Santa Maria [11,22,37]Unknown2005 [37]
  Order Bonnemaisoniales
   Family Bonnemaisoniaceae
Asparagopsis armata Australia, New Zealand [9]Formigas [16]; São Miguel [9,10,11,24,31,32]; Santa Maria [9,10,11,22,31]; Terceira [9,10,11,19,31]; Graciosa [9,10,11,21,31,38]; São Jorge [9,11,18,31]; Pico [9,10,11,20,31]; Faial [9,10,11]; Flores [9,10,11,23]; Corvo [9,10,11,23]Hull fouling [10]1988 [38]
Asparagopsis taxiformis Indo-Pacific [10]São Miguel [10,11,31,32,39]; Santa Maria [9,10,11,31,40]; Terceira [39]; Graciosa [9]; Pico [9,10,11,31]; Faial [9,11,39]; Flores [9,10,11,41]Hull fouling [10]1928 [39]
Bonnemaisonia hamifera Northwestern Pacific [10]São Miguel [24]; Santa Maria [22]; Terceira [10,11,19,31]; Graciosa [9,10,11,38]; Faial [9,10,11,34]; Flores [9]Ballast water or Hull fouling [10]1988 [38]
  Order Ceramiales
   Family Callithamniaceae
Aglaothamnion cordatum +Indian Ocean [10]Graciosa [10,21,31]; Pico [10,20,31]Ballast water, Hull fouling [10]2006 [31]
Scageliopsis patens Indo-Pacific [10]São Miguel [10,11,24,32]; Faial [10,11,42,43]Ballast water, Hull fouling [10]1989 [43]
   Family Ceramiaceae
Acrothamnion preissii *Indo-Pacific [12]Santa Maria [11,12,22]Hull fouling [12]2009 [12]
Antithamnion densum *Indo-Pacific [10]Pico [10,11,31]Hull fouling [44]2007 [31]
Antithamnion diminuatum Indo-Pacific [10]São Miguel [10,11,24,31,32]; Graciosa [10,11,21,31]; São Jorge [10,11,31]; Pico [10,11,20,31]; Faial [10,11,34,42,43] Ballast water, Hull fouling [10]1989 [43]
Antithamnion hubbsii +Indian Ocean [45]São Miguel [24]; Santa Maria [22]Ballast water, Hull fouling [45]1989 [22]
Antithamnion nipponicum + * °Northwestern Pacific [10]Faial [9,10,42,43]Ballast water, Hull fouling [10]1989 [43]
Antithamnionella elegans + * °Indo-Pacific [35]São Miguel [26]Hull fouling [26]2018 [26]
Antithamnionella spirographidis +Indo-Pacific [35]São Miguel [24]; Graciosa [21]Ballast water, Hull fouling [45]2012 [21]
Antithamnionella ternifolia * 2Indo-Pacific [10]São Miguel [10,11,24,27,46]Hull fouling [10]1987 [46]
Ceramium cingulatum Indian Ocean [10]São Miguel [10,11,31]; Terceira [10,11,19,31]; São Jorge [10,11,31]; Pico [10,11,20,31]Unknown [10]2007 [31]
   Family Delesseriaceae
Hypoglossum heterocystideum + *Indo-Pacific (based on [28])Graciosa [21]Unknown2014 [21]
   Family Rhodomelaceae
Laurencia brongniartii + 3Pacific Ocean [10]São Miguel [24]; Graciosa [10,31]; São Jorge [10,18,31]; Pico [10,20,31]Unknown [10]1994 [24]
Laurencia chondrioides +Western Atlantic [10]Terceira [10,19,31]; Graciosa [10,31]; São Jorge [10,18,31]; Pico [10,20,31]Unknown [10]2006 [31]
Laurencia dendroidea +Indian Ocean [10]Formigas [16]; São Miguel [10,24,31]; Graciosa [10,21,31]; São Jorge [10,31]; Pico [10,20,31]; Faial [17]Unknown [10]1990 [16]
Laurencia minuta +Indian Ocean (based on [28])Terceira [19]; Graciosa [21]; Pico [20]Unknown2006 [21]
Lophocladia trichoclados 4Western Atlantic [47]São Miguel [11,48]; Santa Maria [11,48]Hull Fouling [48]2016 [48]
Melanothamnus harveyi Northwestern Pacific [10] Santa Maria [22]; Graciosa [10,11,21,31]Ballast water, Hull fouling [10]2005 [31]
Melanothamnus sphaerocarpus +Western Atlantic [10]São Miguel [10,31]; Terceira [10,19,31]; Pico [10,31]Ballast water, Hull fouling [10]2007 [31]
Symphyocladia marchantioides Pacific [10]Formigas [10,42,49]; São Miguel [10,11,24,31,42,46,49]; Santa Maria [10,11,22,31,42,49]; Terceira [10,11,19,31]; Graciosa [10,11,21,42,49]; São Jorge [10,11,31]; Pico [10,11,20,31,34,42,50]; Faial [9,10,11,34,42,50]; Flores [9,23]Ballast water, Hull fouling [10]1971 [49]
Xiphosiphonia pennata + 5Atlantic and Pacific Oceans [51]São Miguel [24,31,42,46]; Santa Maria [31]; Graciosa [31]; São Jorge [31]Unknown1987 [46]
Xiphosiphonia pinnulata + 6Northwestern Pacific [10]São Miguel [10,24,31]; Santa Maria [10,31]; Graciosa [10,21,31]Hull fouling [10]2005 [31]
   Family Wrangeliaceae
Grallatoria reptans + *Western Atlantic [10]São Miguel [10,24,31]Unknown [10,44]2007–2008 [31]
Gymnophycus hapsiphorus *Australia, New Zealand [11]São Miguel [11,24,26,27,48]Hull fouling [48]2009–2010 [27]
Spongoclonium caribaeum +Indo-Pacific [10]São Miguel [10,31]; Pico [10,20,31]Hull fouling, Aquaculture [10]2007 [31]
  Order Gigartinales
   Family Cystocloniaceae
Hypnea flagelliformis Indo-Pacific [10]São Miguel [10,11,31]; Pico [10,11,24,31]Hull fouling [10]2007 [31]
  Order Halymeniales
   Family Halymeniaceae
Corynomorpha prismatica + * °Indian Ocean [10]São Miguel [10,42,52]Unknown [10]1990 [52]
   Family Grateloupiaceae
Grateloupia turuturu 7Northwestern Pacific [10]São Miguel [11,31]; Pico [11,31]Hull fouling [10]2007 [31]
Phylum Chlorophyta
 Class Ulvophyceae
  Order Bryopsidales
   Family Caulerpaceae
Caulerpa prolifera Western Atlantic [13]São Miguel [11,13,24,48]; Faial [11,48,53]Rafting, Ballast water [53], Hull fouling, Escape from aquarium [13]2013 [53]
Caulerpa webbiana *Indian Ocean [10]Faial [9,10,11,17]Hull fouling [54]2002 [9]
   Family Codiaceae
Codium fragile Northwestern Pacific [10]São Miguel [7,10,11,24]; Santa Maria [11,22]; Graciosa [21]; Pico [20]; Flores [23]; Corvo [7,10,11,23]Ballast water, Hull fouling [10]1993 [7]
   Family Halimedaceae
Halimeda incrassata *Western Atlantic and Indo-Pacific [55]Santa Maria [11,48]Hull Fouling [48]2016 [48]
1 The species is established in the Mediterranean where it was introduced from shellfish aquaculture [45]. 2 Castro and Viegas [46] reported the species Antithamnion sarniensis, with Neto [42] further amending this record as the heterotypic synonym Antithamnionella spirographidis. Since Antithamnion sarniensis is currently regarded as a homotypic synonym of Antithamnionella ternifolia [28], the record is only considered for the latter species. 3 The species is established in the Atlantic coast of France where it was introduced from shellfish aquaculture [44,56]. 4 Molecular-based identification is needed to confirm this record since the true Lophocladia trichoclados is apparently an Atlantic species [47], therefore not an NNS. 5 Xiphosiphonia pennata is a complex species reported in the Atlantic and the Indo-Pacific. Molecular-based identification is needed to confirm this record, since the true X. pennata is apparently restricted to European shores [51], therefore probably not an NNS. 6 Xiphosiphonia pennata is a complex species (including X. pinnulata) reported in the Atlantic and the Indo-Pacific. Molecular-based identification is needed to confirm this record, since the true X. pinnulata is apparently restricted to the Atlantic [51], therefore probably not an NNS. 7 According to Gavio and Fredericq [57], the Atlantic non-native Grateloupia doryphora should be referred to as G. turuturu; therefore, the distribution in the Azores is based only on reports of the first species. All reports based on G. filicina (since [58]) are removed from the previous inventory [11]. Nevertheless, vouchers of this species reported to the Azores should be re-examined, since reports of G. filicina var. luxurians, currently referred as G. subpectinata, are thought to be introductions in Ireland and Britain [59].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gabriel, D.; Ferreira, A.I.; Micael, J.; Fredericq, S. Non-Native Marine Macroalgae of the Azores: An Updated Inventory. Diversity 2023, 15, 1089. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15101089

AMA Style

Gabriel D, Ferreira AI, Micael J, Fredericq S. Non-Native Marine Macroalgae of the Azores: An Updated Inventory. Diversity. 2023; 15(10):1089. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15101089

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gabriel, Daniela, Ana Isabel Ferreira, Joana Micael, and Suzanne Fredericq. 2023. "Non-Native Marine Macroalgae of the Azores: An Updated Inventory" Diversity 15, no. 10: 1089. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15101089

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop