The Evolutionary Path of Performance Measurement and Management in Light of Global Challenges

A special issue of Administrative Sciences (ISSN 2076-3387).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2024 | Viewed by 3906

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Management, University of Turin, Corso Unione Sovietica 218 bis, Turin, Italy
Interests: performance measurement; performance management; public sector; SMEs
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Management, University of Turin, Corso Unione Sovietica 218 bis, Turin, Italy
Interests: performance measurement; performance management; healthcare sector; public administration
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Management, University of Turin, Corso Unione Sovietica 218 bis, Turin, Italy
Interests: performance measurement; management control; business and administration; SMEs
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Management, University of Turin, Corso Unione Sovietica 218 bis, Turin, Italy
Interests: management control; business and administration; healthcare sector; not for profit
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Management, University of Turin, Corso Unione Sovietica 218 bis, Turin, Italy
Interests: accounting; business and administration; public administration; not for profit

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In the current business context, it is essential to develop excellent performance measurement and management systems, i.e., a reporting system that provides feedback to employees on the outcome of the actions taken (Bititci, 2015). Achieving a balance between performance measurement and management is the goal of effective performance measurement and management design (Smith and Bititci, 2017).

Before defining this Special Issue’s objectives, it is useful to define the two main concepts: performance measurement and performance management. The literature defines performance measurement as a process composed of activities such as the collection, analysis, and visualization of information aimed at reporting on company performance (Smith and Bititci, 2017). Performance management is a process composed of activities such as dissemination, communication, and improvement of the achieved performance, which is aimed at using measures to manage the performance of organizations (Franco-Santos et al., 2012). For the development of an efficient and effective system, companies should ensure that both performance measurement and management processes are developed, as are the right interactions between the various activities of the two processes. The balance between performance measurement and performance management should establish the basis for designing, implementing, and using a performance measurement and management system (Bititci, 2015). This system reflects the control of the corporate strategy adopted within the organization and provides the information necessary to verify the content and validity of the implemented strategy (Ittner and Larcker, 2003). Furthermore, it should allow performance communication, relationship management, and learning through continuous feedback (Franco-Santos et al., 2012).

Despite the scientific literature investigating these aspects for decades, the current economic, environmental, and social context presents new challenges to be solved in order to support the public, private, and non-profit sectors. An article published in the International Journal of Management Review (Bititci et al., 2012) identified eight major challenges, such as the development of performance measurement and management in collaborative organizations, innovative companies, and international organizations. The recent research outlines the scarce adoption of performance measurement and management systems suitable for new organizational environments characterized by an important technological impact and strong globalization (Jardioui et al., 2019; Sardi et al., 2020, 2021). Although numerous studies investigated this topic, the performance measurement literature needs more contributions to explain how the current highly uncertain, volatile, and ambiguous operating environment is affecting performance measurement and management (Nudurupati et al., 2021) and how organizations should be managed in increasingly complex organizational environments (Bourne et al., 2018; Sardi et al., 2022; Smith and Bititci, 2017).

The overall objective of this call for papers is to improve the current knowledge and identify the current evolutionary path of performance measurement and management. To achieve this goal, we are asking for theoretical and practical contributions on performance measurement and management in order to support the literature and the public, private, and not-for-profit sectors.

Bititci, U.S. (2015), Managing Business Performance: The Science and the Art, Wiley Blackwell, Edinburgh, U.K.

Bititci, U.S., Garengo, P., Dörfler, V. and Nudurupati, S. (2012), “Performance Measurement: Challenges for Tomorrow”, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 305–327.

Bourne, M., Franco-Santos, M., Micheli, P. and Pavlov, A. (2018), “Performance measurement and management : a system of systems perspective”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 56 No. 8, pp. 1–12.

Franco-Santos, M., Lucianetti, L. and Bourne, M. (2012), “Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and a framework for research”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 79–119.

Ittner, C.D. and Larcker, D.F. (2003), “Coming Up Short on Nonfinancial Performance Measurement”, Harvard Business Review., Vol. 81 No. 11, pp. 88–95.

Jardioui, M., Garengo, P. and El Alami, S. (2019), “How organizational culture influences performance measurement systems in SMEs”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 69 No. 2, pp. 217–235.

Nudurupati, S.S., Garengo, P. and Bititci, U.S. (2021), “Impact of the changing business environment on performance measurement and management practices”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 232, p. 107942.

Sardi, A., Sorano, E., Ferraris, A. and Garengo, P. (2020), “Evolutionary Paths of Performance Measurement and Management System: The Longitudinal Case Study of a Leading SME”, Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 495–510.

Sardi, A., Sorano, E., Garengo, P. and Ferraris, A. (2021), “The role of HRM in the innovation of performance measurement and management systems: a multiple case study in SMEs”, Employee Relations, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 589–606.

Sardi, A., Sorano, E., Giovando, G. and Tradori, V. (2022), “Performance measurement and management system 4.0: an action research study in investee NPOs by local government”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, No. ahead-of-print.

Smith, M. and Bititci, U.S. (2017), “Interplay between performance measurement and management, employee engagement and performance”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 37 No. 9, pp. 1207–1228.

Dr. Alberto Sardi
Dr. Enrico Sorano
Dr. Guido Giovando
Dr. Vania Tradori
Dr. Christian Rainero
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Administrative Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • performance measurement
  • performance management
  • business performance
  • public and private sectors
  • not-for-profit organizations
  • healthcare sector
  • public administration
  • government

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 828 KiB  
Article
Innovation’s Performance: A Transnational Analysis Based on the Global Innovation Index
by Evelina Maria Oliveira Coutinho and Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira
Adm. Sci. 2024, 14(2), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14020032 - 16 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1206
Abstract
The pandemic marked the beginning of a succession of events on a global scale (not the least of which is a greater concern for the environment and for quality of life/distance work) with a major impact on the economy. Innovation plays a key [...] Read more.
The pandemic marked the beginning of a succession of events on a global scale (not the least of which is a greater concern for the environment and for quality of life/distance work) with a major impact on the economy. Innovation plays a key role in meeting the challenges of the future, but despite investment in innovation, global economic growth has fallen short of the expected performance. The aim of this study is to identify the factors with the greatest impact on the performance of innovation ecosystems based on the performance of the innovation ecosystems of 64 countries assessed by the Global Innovation Index 2022. The methodology consists of multiple hierarchical linear regressions, in which the impact factors on innovation ecosystems, measured through indicators, are the independent variables and innovation performance, in knowledge and technology and in creativity, are the dependent variables in an iterative process, using STATA/MP 18.0 data analysis software. The results indicate that human capital and research (the basis of business and innovative products aimed at filling gaps in the market are people with a good higher education, which is also linked to local university rankings) and business sophistication (highly qualified work, leveraging strategic partnerships, and with knowledge absorption capacity) are the main pillars determining innovation performance at a global level. Education (an educated workforce is of growing importance in the knowledge era), R&D investment (including support from the state in the form of tax incentives for whoever invests in R&D), innovation partnerships (for a faster, more open innovation effort), ecological sustainability (a new reinforced priority after COVID-19) and knowledge absorption (to absorb one must first detain valuable knowledge in the area) are the variables with the greatest impact on innovation performance. The work provides guidance on which areas should be prioritized in the development of policies and strategies to accelerate innovation in countries. The study is limited by the time frame and reveals, by comparison with pre-pandemic studies, that the determinants of innovation can be dynamic, varying according to the countries and, consequently, the global context of the analysis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1015 KiB  
Article
The Impacts of Supply Chain Capabilities, Visibility, Resilience on Supply Chain Performance and Firm Performance
by Yung-Fu Huang, Vu-Dung-Van Phan and Manh-Hoang Do
Adm. Sci. 2023, 13(10), 225; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13100225 - 18 Oct 2023
Viewed by 2339
Abstract
This study explores the significance of two determinants: Supply Chain Capabilities and Supply Chain Visibility, in the intricate interplay among Supply Chain Resilience, Supply Chain Performance, and Firm Performance. A dataset comprising 221 participants from Vietnamese garment manufacturing firms was gathered and subjected [...] Read more.
This study explores the significance of two determinants: Supply Chain Capabilities and Supply Chain Visibility, in the intricate interplay among Supply Chain Resilience, Supply Chain Performance, and Firm Performance. A dataset comprising 221 participants from Vietnamese garment manufacturing firms was gathered and subjected to analysis using the PLS-SEM approach, revealing insights into the modeled complex relationships. The research findings reveal that visibility significantly influences supply chain resilience; while the hypotheses of a positive impact of supply chain visibility and supply chain resilience on firm performance have been rejected. Interestingly, these findings underscore the significant influence of indirect relationships mediated by factors, such as supply chain resilience and supply chain performance. Hence, this study bridges a gap in the existing body of literature and offers practical implications for supply chain management, particularly concerning performance measurement challenges in this sector. The article suggests that the Vietnamese garment supply chain could enhance supply chain and firm performance by focusing on supply chain capabilities and visibility. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop