Psychological Well-Being and Mental Health

A special issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X). This special issue belongs to the section "Health Psychology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2024 | Viewed by 2823

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Mental health is a basic human right. And it is crucial to personal, community, and socio-economic development. The World Health Organization define mental health as a state of mental wellbeing that enables people to cope with the stresses of life, realize their abilities, learn and work well, and contribute to their community. It is an integral component of health and wellbeing that underpins our individual and collective abilities to make decisions, build relationships, and shape the world we live in. Mental health is perceived as more than an absence of mental disorders. It exists on a complex continuum, which is experienced differently from one person to the next, with varying degrees of difficulty and distress, and potentially very different social and clinical outcomes. In order to reach an optimal state of mental health, it is important to prevent psychological disease and to promote psychological wellbeing.

The focus of this Special Issue is the study of the prevention of psychological diseases and the promotion of psychological wellbeing. 

Potential topics include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Mental health prevention;
  • Psychological wellbeing promotion;
  • Quality of life and related factors;
  • Relationship between mental health and wellbeing;
  • Mental health care and treatment.

Dr. Stefano Eleuteri
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • mental health
  • prevention
  • promotion
  • quality of life
  • wellbeing
  • treatment

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

12 pages, 831 KiB  
Article
Secondary Female Anorgasmia in Patients with Obsessive Traits: A Study
by Giulio Perrotta and Stefano Eleuteri
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(10), 953; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100953 - 16 Oct 2024
Viewed by 592
Abstract
Background: In the literature, female anorgasmia (AO) is closely related to obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), but no publication has explored the role of individual obsessive traits that may also be typical of other disorders, assuming that repetitive thoughts and compulsions must necessarily correspond [...] Read more.
Background: In the literature, female anorgasmia (AO) is closely related to obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), but no publication has explored the role of individual obsessive traits that may also be typical of other disorders, assuming that repetitive thoughts and compulsions must necessarily correspond to an obsessive-type neurotic profile. It is worth investigating and assessing the specific weight of other morbid conditions involved, beyond OCD. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted during 2022–2023 by selecting 208 Italian clinical patients from private databases. They submitted to individual clinical interviews and two psychometric questionnaires (Perrotta Integrative Clinical Interviews 3, PICI-3-TA, and Perrotta Individual Sexual Matrix Questionnaire, PSM-Q). Results: Among the 208 patients (M: 39.05 years), divided into subgroups by age and obsessive symptomatology, no significant differences were found between the subgroups in the comparisons of the data obtained from the administration of the PSM-Q. Conclusions: This study confirms that it is not OCD that correlates with OA but obsessive traits, which are also common to other psychopathological disorders, such as bipolar disorder, borderline disorder, manic, and psychotic disorders and, therefore, in psychotherapy, it is necessary to intervene with a clinical approach that has in mind the patient’s psychopathological personality picture and the causes that originated or reinforced OA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychological Well-Being and Mental Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 268 KiB  
Article
Exploring the Relationship between Self-Compassion and Psychological Pain: A Canonical Correlation Analysis
by Ariana Garabedian, Alexandra Dluzniewski, Russell T. Baker and Madeline P. Casanova
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(8), 631; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14080631 - 24 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1126
Abstract
This study investigated the association between self-compassion and psychological pain across various demographic variables. Using canonical correlation analysis, we observed an inverse relationship between the combined factors of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) and the Orbach and Mikulincer Mental Pain Scale (OMMP-8). Subgroup analyses [...] Read more.
This study investigated the association between self-compassion and psychological pain across various demographic variables. Using canonical correlation analysis, we observed an inverse relationship between the combined factors of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) and the Orbach and Mikulincer Mental Pain Scale (OMMP-8). Subgroup analyses revealed differences in SCS subscales among demographic groups with females, individuals with mental health diagnoses, and non-athletes displaying higher scores on negative SCS subscales and PsyPn. Injury status did not significantly affect self-compassion levels, although injured individuals scored higher on the irreversibility subscale of PsyPn. Negative SCS factors exhibited larger group differences and stronger correlations with PsyPn, indicating the potency of negative thinking in influencing psychological pain. These findings underscore the importance of self-compassion in mental health and suggest potential implications for intervention strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychological Well-Being and Mental Health)

Review

Jump to: Research

16 pages, 1006 KiB  
Review
Just-World Beliefs, System Justification, and Their Relationship with People’s Health-Related Well-Being: A Narrative Review
by Camilo Silva, Víctor Pedrero, Jaime Barrientos, Jorge Manzi and Katiuska Reynaldos
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(10), 941; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100941 - 14 Oct 2024
Viewed by 672
Abstract
Beliefs about a social system help people understand and evaluate their environment and are related to their behavior within a society. When people believe that they live in a just social system and develop positive attitudes about the social and political environment, they [...] Read more.
Beliefs about a social system help people understand and evaluate their environment and are related to their behavior within a society. When people believe that they live in a just social system and develop positive attitudes about the social and political environment, they experience greater satisfaction and well-being. This phenomenon is known as a palliative effect. Two theoretical approaches that explain support for social and political systems are the beliefs in a just world and system justification approaches. The objective of this review was to analyze the literature published between 2019 and 2023 that addressed the associations of beliefs in a just world and system justification with health-related well-being. The search yielded 2064 potentially eligible articles, 26 of which were ultimately selected. The results showed that beliefs in a just world are associated with a more positive perception of the world and better health outcomes. In addition, people with a greater propensity to justify the system experience higher levels of health-related well-being. This positive association is consistently observed across different social groups and contexts. These findings support the phenomenon of palliative effects attributable to beliefs in a just world and system justification. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychological Well-Being and Mental Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop