Genes 2026, 17(1), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17010031 (registering DOI) - 29 Dec 2025
Abstract
Background: Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) enables high-resolution characterization of cellular heterogeneity and provides unique opportunities to identify rare cell populations that may be obscured in bulk transcriptomic data. However, despite the growing interest in rare-cell discovery, most existing detection methods were originally
[...] Read more.
Background: Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) enables high-resolution characterization of cellular heterogeneity and provides unique opportunities to identify rare cell populations that may be obscured in bulk transcriptomic data. However, despite the growing interest in rare-cell discovery, most existing detection methods were originally developed for single-sample datasets, and their behavior in multi-sample settings—where batch effects, sample imbalance, and heterogeneous cell-type compositions are common—remains poorly understood. This study aims to systematically evaluate representative rare cell detection methods under multi-sample settings and identify the most effective analytical strategies. Methods: We performed a comprehensive benchmarking analysis of five widely used rare cell detection tools, CellSIUS, GapClust, GiniClust, scCAD, SCISSORS and a scGPT-based rare cell detection method using Isolation Forest. Each method was evaluated under three analytical strategies: individual sample detection, pooled sample detection, and batch-corrected pooled sample detection. Performance was assessed across multiple publicly available scRNA-seq datasets using standardized evaluation metrics. Results: Batch-corrected pooled sample detection consistently achieved the highest overall performance across methods and datasets, whereas individual sample detection produced the weakest results. Among the evaluated tools, scCAD demonstrated the most robust and stable performance across dataset types and analytical conditions. Conclusions: This study provides strategy-level comparison in multi-sample settings. Our findings highlight the importance of batch correction and pooled analysis for improving rare cell detection accuracy and offer practical guidance for selecting optimal methods and analytical workflows in large-scale single-cell transcriptomic studies.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Bioinformatics)
