sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Towards the Ecological Transition: Urban Regeneration Models in the Circular Economy Perspective

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Urban and Rural Development".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 October 2023) | Viewed by 10389

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Architecture, University of Naples Federico II, 80134 Naples, Italy
Interests: urban regeneration; circular economy; circular city; cultural heritage conservation and regeneration; integrated evaluation; multidimensional indicators
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute for Research on Innovation and Services for Development, National Research Council (CNR-IRISS), 80134 Naples, Italy
Interests: urban regeneration; circular economy; cultural heritage; multidimensional indicators; common goods
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Nowadays, the challenge of sustainability is increasingly concentrated in cities, representing the favorite field to implement actions aimed at supporting the transition to a more human-centered and ecological development paradigm. The ecological conversion of our cities, proposed in many European and non-European documents (Agenda 2030, New Urban Agenda, European Green Deal, etc.), connects economic and environmental goals with social justice; thus, implementing a systemic approach placing the human-centered paradigm together with the ecological one.

This new approach requires novel implementation models and tools. In this perspective, today, the circular economy is emerging in most sectors as an effective model capable of making this approach operational, going beyond its reductive interpretation as the economy of reuse, recycling, and regeneration, and is configured as an economy not in conflict with the economy of man and nature, but as a co-evolutionary economy. In the spatial–territorial dimension, the circular economy model finds its “translation” in the circular city model, a model of urban regeneration capable of producing multidimensional benefits, that is, economic, environmental, and social–cultural benefits, at the same time. This city model is characterized by a system of relationships binding the different forms of capital (both tangible and intangible) in a systemic perspective, in which the urban regeneration processes become multipliers of relationships between people and between people and the context. In this perspective, urban metabolism is understood not only in quantitative terms (material flows, waste flows, etc.), but also in qualitative terms.

In order to ensure that new models of urban development are really useful to cities, the principles and theoretical criteria have to be supported by tools (assessment tools and business, governance and financing models), which, in turn, necessarily require a strong cultural base, the latter being necessary in order to develop and support shared and sustained initiatives from the bottom, in line with the humanization paradigm. In this context, the discipline of evaluation becomes fundamental, and helps not only to compare design alternatives already provided, but also to continuously produce, through a circular feedback and retroactive loops, new solutions aiming at a positive-sum game, in which all subjects gain benefits.

On the basis of the above, contributions from the scientific community are welcome regarding issues related to urban regeneration processes, with particular reference to:

  • The circular city model;
  • The adaptive reuse of cultural heritage;
  • Sustainable and circular tourism;
  • Innovative governance models;
  • Innovative business models;
  • Innovative financial models;
  • Evaluation tools;
  • Urban mobility.

The above topics are merely suggestions and are not binding, and other proposals addressing the above topic from different perspectives are welcome.

Dr. Francesca Nocca
Dr. Martina Bosone
Prof. Dr. Luigi Fusco Girard
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (7 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

23 pages, 9017 KiB  
Article
A Playground and Arts for a Community in Transition: A Circular Model for Built Heritage Regeneration in the Sanità District (Naples, Italy)
by Francesca Ciampa, Katia Fabbricatti, Gianluigi Freda and Maria Rita Pinto
Sustainability 2024, 16(7), 2640; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072640 - 23 Mar 2024
Viewed by 454
Abstract
Open spaces for collective use in the built heritage of cities are the places to promote and sustain social, cultural, and economic changes. The transformation of the built environment raises awareness of following the policies and tools for the implementation of the EU [...] Read more.
Open spaces for collective use in the built heritage of cities are the places to promote and sustain social, cultural, and economic changes. The transformation of the built environment raises awareness of following the policies and tools for the implementation of the EU New Generation Programme, redefining the framework of intervention priorities at the urban scale. Tackling the increasing physical degradation, underutilization, social disparity, and loss of the tangible and intangible culture of these types of spaces, this research identifies artistic production and social cohesion as the enabling factors of maintenance. The regeneration of areas of collective use returns an experimentation of strategic importance for the participatory and shared care of consolidated heritage contexts. The Sanità district in Naples represents a case study of a community-built custom playground, testing a co-design approach, maintaining the consolidated qualities, and awakening the responsibility of the youngest. The outcome is a circular model that focuses on the regeneration of such spaces, transforming an abandoned built environment from waste into a resource. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 3953 KiB  
Article
Reconciling Heritage Buildings’ Preservation with Energy Transition Goals: Insights from an Italian Case Study
by Giovanna Franco and Sara Mauri
Sustainability 2024, 16(2), 712; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020712 - 13 Jan 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1011
Abstract
The construction industry in Europe significantly contributes to energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions, and this has prompted the European Union to issue directives for renovating and decarbonizing the existing building stock to meet 2050’s energy and environmental targets. However, achieving nearly zero-energy [...] Read more.
The construction industry in Europe significantly contributes to energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions, and this has prompted the European Union to issue directives for renovating and decarbonizing the existing building stock to meet 2050’s energy and environmental targets. However, achieving nearly zero-energy building (nZEB) standards in historic buildings is a complex challenge, as heritage values cannot be compromised for the sake of energy improvements. Our research advocates for a “whole building approach”, integrating various disciplines to achieve low-energy retrofitting while preserving historical material authenticity. The proposed methodology, inspired by the EN16883:2017 standard, involves a comprehensive building survey and assessment, the definition of conservation-compatible design solutions, and a performance analysis of these selected measures in relation to nZEB standards. This method was then applied to an ongoing project on a small, listed building in Genoa, demonstrating the feasibility of achieving conservation and high energy savings and, in these specific circumstances, the possibility of approaching nZEB parameters. This best practice example highlights the importance of adopting a cross-disciplinary, structured method to balance different values and needs in retrofitting projects, and it shows how creative and innovative solutions can break down the typical barriers encountered when implementing retrofitting solutions for built heritage. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 11267 KiB  
Article
Circular Water Management in Public Space—Experimental Feasibility Studies in Different Urban Contexts
by Elvira Nicolini and Antonella Mamì
Sustainability 2023, 15(15), 12025; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151512025 - 05 Aug 2023
Viewed by 874
Abstract
Several studies highlight the risks related to the growing water crisis, worsened by the effects of pollution, which increasingly make water sources non-potable. The current water-sensitive urban design (WSUD) approach improves resource efficiency and implements urban livability by combining natural water flows with [...] Read more.
Several studies highlight the risks related to the growing water crisis, worsened by the effects of pollution, which increasingly make water sources non-potable. The current water-sensitive urban design (WSUD) approach improves resource efficiency and implements urban livability by combining natural water flows with all the scales of the urban landscape. The logistic and operational management of water disposal/treatment and distribution requires performing service design according to cities’ physical and morphological features, starting from their architectural and landscape characteristics. This paper aims to prove that different landscapes can offer different inspirations and possibilities to imagine a WSUD-coherent system, fulfilling the integration requirements with the urban system. For this purpose, three case studies, differing by dimension, morphology, and urban typology, are analyzed, experimenting with circular water usage with no resource waste. This research proposes concrete actions such as conservation, restoration or addition of permeable surfaces, the installation of new accumulation and treatment systems, and the use of water-saving devices. Starting from redesigning the water system, they can also include punctual redevelopment interventions on the urban built environments and opportunities for network development with public administrations, private businesses, third-sector organizations, and end users. This experimentation has led to water savings of up to 80% of the current consumption scenario. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 4153 KiB  
Article
Stimulating Circular Urban Regeneration through Cultural and Sustainable Communities: The Proposal for a Green Blue Youth Vision 2030
by Martina Bosone, Maria Casola, Gaia Daldanise and Domenico Vito
Sustainability 2023, 15(14), 11294; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411294 - 20 Jul 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1089
Abstract
In the European context, culture has a key role in sustainable development strategies. Within the framework of the UNESCO Culture 2030 Agenda, new cultural approaches support sustainable policies by affecting individual and collective behavior towards interpreting sustainability as a ‘common good’. This paper [...] Read more.
In the European context, culture has a key role in sustainable development strategies. Within the framework of the UNESCO Culture 2030 Agenda, new cultural approaches support sustainable policies by affecting individual and collective behavior towards interpreting sustainability as a ‘common good’. This paper aims to define innovative sustainability strategies from the perspectives of younger generations, in order to understand the transformative potential of new cultural approaches to sustainability and common goods in achieving the Agenda 2030 goals. The ‘Green Blue Youth Vision 2030’ approach analyses the different multidimensional components of possible innovative cultural alternatives by emphasizing the potential of the proposals from young people. The initial results consist of defining “Green Blue Youth Vision 2030” proposals collected during the co-design roundtables, and analyzing key results from a survey on the direct and potential beneficiaries of the Green Blue Days project in Southern Italy. In conclusion, the research allows for preliminary reflections on the definition, by the new generations, of a new way of understanding sustainability as a common good, oriented towards overcoming cultural, economic, environmental, and social conflicts to stimulate circular urban regeneration in Southern Italy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 4373 KiB  
Article
A Creative Approach for the Architectural Technology: Using the ExtrArtis Model to Regenerate the Built Environment
by Francesca Ciampa
Sustainability 2023, 15(11), 9124; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15119124 - 05 Jun 2023
Viewed by 1078
Abstract
In the context of cultural heritage reuse, creative businesses can play the role of activators of sustainable transition processes in the built environment. The exercise of the functions by creative enterprises can improve actions of regeneration of local identity, values, and built heritage. [...] Read more.
In the context of cultural heritage reuse, creative businesses can play the role of activators of sustainable transition processes in the built environment. The exercise of the functions by creative enterprises can improve actions of regeneration of local identity, values, and built heritage. The aim is to demonstrate that creative enterprises are strategic industries able to activate actions of custody and cultural heritage valorization, proposing themselves on the territory as culture-led regeneration tools. The methodology discusses integrated strategies that intervene in the systemic criticalities of cities to regenerate tangible and intangible cultural heritage through multidimensional, multi-actor, and multicriteria approaches, matching community and the built environment. The result concerns the identification of a system of actor issues and creative criteria using the ExtrArtis© model, a transformative driver that constitutes a creative class as the guardian of the genius loci. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 1477 KiB  
Article
Circular Economy Management of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) in Italian Urban Systems: Comparison and Perspectives
by Patrizia Ghisellini, Ivana Quinto, Renato Passaro and Sergio Ulgiati
Sustainability 2023, 15(11), 9054; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15119054 - 03 Jun 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1786
Abstract
This study evaluates the current collection and recycling of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) in Italy by means of the analysis of national and regional data from EUROSTAT and the Italian WEEE Coordination Centre database, as well as through qualitative interviews with [...] Read more.
This study evaluates the current collection and recycling of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) in Italy by means of the analysis of national and regional data from EUROSTAT and the Italian WEEE Coordination Centre database, as well as through qualitative interviews with key stakeholders of the WEEE management system of the Campania region (Southern Italy). Urban systems, among which the metropolitan city of Naples in the Campania region, are the main users of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (EEE) and, as a consequence, the main generators of WEEE, which must be managed and recovered properly in order to prevent the loss of valuable resources and the associated environmental impacts. In addition to analysing the current state of WEEE collection and recycling in Italy and its regions and urban systems, the study aims to improve our understanding of the WEEE reverse supply chain and the main barriers and drivers to collection and recycling. The results reveal that the main barriers to the collection/delivery/recycling of WEEE resulted in the low awareness of the citizens about the importance of WEEE recovery, the lack of trust towards administrators, the lack of certified first treatment plants, the aversion of the citizens to the opening of new plants due to past inefficient solutions in solid waste management, the exploitation of high value materials only (so-called “cannibalization”, the illegal trade of WEEE, the influence of the market on the valorization of secondary materials), and, finally, the dominance of economic efficiency over the proximity advantage for the disposal of solid waste. On the other hand, the main drivers for collection emerged to be the adoption of education programmes in schools and constant communication campaigns directed to citizens in order to improve WEEE collection and recycling behaviour; the adoption of economic and non-economic incentives; the availability of municipal collection points (ecological islands) and other collection centres characterised by easy access by citizens for the delivery of their WEEE. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 18143 KiB  
Article
A Sustainable Adaptive Reuse Management Model for Disused Railway Cultural Heritage to Boost Local and Regional Competitiveness
by Alessandra Bianchi and Stefania De Medici
Sustainability 2023, 15(6), 5127; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065127 - 14 Mar 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3063
Abstract
Building reuse is a strategy for built heritage enhancement. The establishment of new activities in an existing building can have positive effects on the urban and territorial context and modify the dynamics of socio-economic development. If the reuse is considered as a cultural [...] Read more.
Building reuse is a strategy for built heritage enhancement. The establishment of new activities in an existing building can have positive effects on the urban and territorial context and modify the dynamics of socio-economic development. If the reuse is considered as a cultural development strategy and not limited to a single building but to both buildings and infrastructures, these effects are amplified. This is the case of railway heritage, affected by an increasingly vast process of abandonment. The Italian policies for encouraging road transport and the communication models of the digital era have contributed to the gradual desertion of railway lines. This requires effective reuse models, to avoid that the Ferrovie dello Stato (State Railways) continue to carry the heavy burden of managing assets no longer able to generate income. The analysis of numerous station reuse cases, at an international level, lead to the selection of the case of the Postal Museum and Mail Ride in London as an example of good practice. The proposed methodology identifies a set of evaluation criteria and indicators to assess the effectiveness of adaptive reuse projects both in terms of their ability to protect built heritage identity and to modify the orientation of the territorial context’s development towards socio-economic sustainability guidelines. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop