Antibody Responses to Viral Infections

A special issue of Viruses (ISSN 1999-4915). This special issue belongs to the section "Viral Immunology, Vaccines, and Antivirals".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 May 2021) | Viewed by 28342

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Emeritus Senior Scientist, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Padriciano 99, 34149 Trieste, Italy

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Antibodies are essential components of the immune response that play key roles in fighting infections caused by most viruses in numerous species, including humans. And, yet, despite their presence in practically all infections, they show a broad profile and very large diversity in the type of response with many particular aspects highly specific for the viruses or the hosts.

Characterization of the properties of antibody responses, including their neutralizing, blocking, or enhancing activities, as well as their broadness for related viruses, is an important step to understanding their protective efficacy and relevance for diagnostic purposes. Novel strategies for inducing the correct antibody responses and/or design of appropriate antigens for improved vaccines can also benefit from the detailed analysis of antibody responses following infections or targeted immunizations.

We anticipate contributions that address these and other features related to the immune responses to different viruses which cover all relevant aspects of antibodies in the context of viral infections.

Dr. Oscar Burrone
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Viruses is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • antibodies
  • virus neutralisation
  • vaccines

Published Papers (7 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

21 pages, 6724 KiB  
Article
Intranasal Administration of a Monoclonal Neutralizing Antibody Protects Mice against SARS-CoV-2 Infection
by Sandro Halwe, Alexandra Kupke, Kanika Vanshylla, Falk Liberta, Henning Gruell, Matthias Zehner, Cornelius Rohde, Verena Krähling, Michelle Gellhorn Serra, Christoph Kreer, Michael Klüver, Lucie Sauerhering, Jörg Schmidt, Zheng Cai, Fei Han, David Young, Guangwei Yang, Marek Widera, Manuel Koch, Anke Werner, Lennart Kämper, Nico Becker, Michael S. Marlow, Markus Eickmann, Sandra Ciesek, Felix Schiele, Florian Klein and Stephan Beckeradd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Viruses 2021, 13(8), 1498; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13081498 - 29 Jul 2021
Cited by 30 | Viewed by 4641
Abstract
Despite the recent availability of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2), there is an urgent need for specific anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs. Monoclonal neutralizing antibodies are an important drug class in the global fight against the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic due to their [...] Read more.
Despite the recent availability of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2), there is an urgent need for specific anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs. Monoclonal neutralizing antibodies are an important drug class in the global fight against the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic due to their ability to convey immediate protection and their potential to be used as both prophylactic and therapeutic drugs. Clinically used neutralizing antibodies against respiratory viruses are currently injected intravenously, which can lead to suboptimal pulmonary bioavailability and thus to a lower effectiveness. Here we describe DZIF-10c, a fully human monoclonal neutralizing antibody that binds the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. DZIF-10c displays an exceptionally high neutralizing potency against SARS-CoV-2, retains full activity against the variant of concern (VOC) B.1.1.7 and still neutralizes the VOC B.1.351, although with reduced potency. Importantly, not only systemic but also intranasal application of DZIF-10c abolished the presence of infectious particles in the lungs of SARS-CoV-2 infected mice and mitigated lung pathology when administered prophylactically. Along with a favorable pharmacokinetic profile, these results highlight DZIF-10c as a novel human SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody with high in vitro and in vivo antiviral potency. The successful intranasal application of DZIF-10c paves the way for clinical trials investigating topical delivery of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibody Responses to Viral Infections)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 764 KiB  
Article
The Role of Respiratory Viruses in Children with Ataxia-Telangiectasia
by Ana Méndez-Echevarría, María Belén Caminoa, Teresa del Rosal, Inmaculada Casas, Francisco Pozo, Samuel Ignacio Pascual-Pascual, Mar García-Romero, Carmen Cámara and Cristina Calvo
Viruses 2021, 13(5), 867; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13050867 - 9 May 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1963
Abstract
Background: The impact of respiratory virus infection in patients diagnosed with ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) has not been well studied. Methods: A prospective case control study was performed at a National Reference Unit for Primary Immunodeficiency in Spain (from November 2018 to July 2019), including [...] Read more.
Background: The impact of respiratory virus infection in patients diagnosed with ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) has not been well studied. Methods: A prospective case control study was performed at a National Reference Unit for Primary Immunodeficiency in Spain (from November 2018 to July 2019), including patients younger than 20 years. Symptom questionnaires and nasopharyngeal swabs from multiple respiratory viruses’ polymerase chain reaction were collected monthly, and between visits in case of symptoms. Results: Twenty-two individuals were included (11 patients; 11 controls); 164 samples were obtained (81 patients; 84 controls). Patients presented respiratory symptoms more frequently compared with controls (26.5% vs. 3.5%; p < 0.01). Viral detection was observed in 23 (27.3%) episodes in patients and in 15 (17.8%) episodes in controls (p = 0.1). Rhinovirus was the most frequent virus in patients and controls (60% and 53.3%, respectively). Episodes with positive viral detection had associated symptoms in 54% of patients and 18% of controls (p = 0.07). However, patients with A-T presented a similar rate of symptoms during episodes with positive and negative viral detection (26% vs. 27%). The median points given for each questionnaire during symptomatic episodes with negative viral detection were 13/23 points, and during symptomatic positive detection, 7.5/23 points (p = 0.1). In the control group, all but two were asymptomatic during positive viral episodes (score: 2/23 and 3/23 points). Symptomatic episodes, with either positive or negative viral detection, were associated with lower IgA and higher IgM titers and higher CD8+ counts (p < 0.05), particularly when these episodes were moderate/severe. Conclusions: Patients with A-T more frequently present symptomatic viral infections than controls, especially those with lower IgA and higher IgM titers and higher CD8+ counts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibody Responses to Viral Infections)
Show Figures

Figure 1

6 pages, 503 KiB  
Communication
Impaired Humoral Response in Renal Transplant Recipients to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech)
by Johannes Korth, Michael Jahn, Oliver Dorsch, Olympia Evdoxia Anastasiou, Burkhard Sorge-Hädicke, Ute Eisenberger, Anja Gäckler, Ulf Dittmer, Oliver Witzke, Benjamin Wilde, Sebastian Dolff and Andreas Kribben
Viruses 2021, 13(5), 756; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13050756 - 25 Apr 2021
Cited by 120 | Viewed by 6153
Abstract
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has a major impact on transplant recipients, with mortality rates up to 20%. Therefore, the effect of established messenger RNA (mRNA)-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have to be evaluated for solid organ transplant patients (SOT) since they are [...] Read more.
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has a major impact on transplant recipients, with mortality rates up to 20%. Therefore, the effect of established messenger RNA (mRNA)-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have to be evaluated for solid organ transplant patients (SOT) since they are known to have poor responses after vaccination. We investigated the SARS-CoV-2 immune response via SARS-CoV-2 IgG detection in 23 renal transplant recipients after two doses of the mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine BNT162b2 following the standard protocol. The antibody response was evaluated once with an anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG CLIA 15.8 +/− 3.0 days after the second dose. As a control, SARS-CoV-2 IgG was determined in 23 healthcare workers (HCW) and compared to the patient cohort. Only 5 of 23 (22%) renal transplant recipients were tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies after the second dose of vaccine. In contrast, all 23 (100%) HCWs were tested positive for antibodies after the second dose. Thus, the humoral response of renal transplant recipients after two doses of the mRNA-based vaccine BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech, Kronach, Germany) is impaired and significantly lower compared to healthy controls (22% vs. 100%; p = 0.0001). Individual vaccination strategies might be beneficial in these vulnerable patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibody Responses to Viral Infections)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3595 KiB  
Article
Neutralizing Monoclonal Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies Isolated from Immunized Rabbits Define Novel Vulnerable Spike-Protein Epitope
by Efi Makdasi, Yinon Levy, Ron Alcalay, Tal Noy-Porat, Eran Zahavy, Adva Mechaly, Eyal Epstein, Eldar Peretz, Hila Cohen, Liat Bar-On, Theodor Chitlaru, Ofer Cohen, Itai Glinert, Hagit Achdout, Tomer Israely, Ronit Rosenfeld and Ohad Mazor
Viruses 2021, 13(4), 566; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13040566 - 26 Mar 2021
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 3813
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies represent an important avenue for COVID-19 therapy and are routinely used for rapid and accessible diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The recent emergence of SARS-CoV-2 genetic variants emphasized the need to enlarge the repertoire of antibodies that target diverse epitopes, the combination [...] Read more.
Monoclonal antibodies represent an important avenue for COVID-19 therapy and are routinely used for rapid and accessible diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The recent emergence of SARS-CoV-2 genetic variants emphasized the need to enlarge the repertoire of antibodies that target diverse epitopes, the combination of which may improve immune-diagnostics, augment the efficiency of the immunotherapy and prevent selection of escape-mutants. Antigen-specific controlled immunization of experimental animals may elicit antibody repertoires that significantly differ from those generated in the context of the immune response mounted in the course of disease. Accordingly, rabbits were immunized by several recombinant antigens representing distinct domains of the viral spike protein and monoclonal antibodies were isolated from single cells obtained by cell sorting. Characterization of a panel of successfully isolated anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) and anti-N-terminal domain (NTD) antibodies demonstrated that they exhibit high specificity and affinity profiles. Anti-RBD antibodies revealing significant neutralizing potency against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro were found to target at least three distinct epitopes. Epitope mapping established that two of these antibodies recognized a novel epitope located on the surface of the RBD. We suggest that the antibodies isolated in this study are useful for designing SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis and therapy approaches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibody Responses to Viral Infections)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1994 KiB  
Article
Radioligand Assay-Based Detection of Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in Hospital Workers Treating Patients with Severe COVID-19 in Japan
by Hidenori Matsunaga, Akiko Makino, Yasuhiro Kato, Teruaki Murakami, Yuta Yamaguchi, Atsushi Kumanogoh, Yuichiro Oba, Satoshi Fujimi, Tomoyuki Honda and Keizo Tomonaga
Viruses 2021, 13(2), 347; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13020347 - 23 Feb 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2418
Abstract
This study aimed to clarify whether infection by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is prevalent among the staff of a hospital providing treatment to patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using radioligand assay (RLA). One thousand samples from the staff [...] Read more.
This study aimed to clarify whether infection by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is prevalent among the staff of a hospital providing treatment to patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using radioligand assay (RLA). One thousand samples from the staff of a general hospital providing treatment to patients with severe COVID-19 were assayed for SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (N) IgG using RLA. Nine patients with COVID-19 who had been treated in inpatient settings and had already recovered were used as control subjects, and 186 blood donor samples obtained more than 10 years ago were used as negative controls. Four of the 1000 samples showed apparently positive results, and approximately 10 or more samples showed slightly high counts. Interestingly, a few among the blood donor samples also showed slightly high values. To validate the results, antibody examinations using ELISA and neutralizing antibody tests were performed on 21 samples, and chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) was performed on 201 samples, both resulting in a very high correlation. One blood donor sample showed slightly positive results in both RLA and CLIA, suggesting a cross-reaction. This study showed that five months after the pandemic began in Japan, the staff of a general hospital with a tertiary emergency medical facility had an extremely low seroprevalence of the antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Further investigation will be needed to determine whether the slightly high results were due to cross-reactions or a low titer of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The quantitative RLA was considered sensitive enough to detect low titers of antibodies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibody Responses to Viral Infections)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 6659 KiB  
Article
Expansion and Refinement of Deep Sequence-Coupled Biopanning Technology for Epitope-Specific Antibody Responses in Human Serum
by Nikole L. Warner, Alexandria C. Linville, Susan B. Core, Brechla Moreno, Juan M. Pascale, David S. Peabody, Bryce Chackerian and Kathryn M. Frietze
Viruses 2020, 12(10), 1114; https://doi.org/10.3390/v12101114 - 30 Sep 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2341
Abstract
Identifying the specific epitopes targeted by antibodies elicited in response to infectious diseases is important for developing vaccines and diagnostics. However, techniques for broadly exploring the specificity of antibodies in a rapid manner are lacking, limiting our ability to quickly respond to emerging [...] Read more.
Identifying the specific epitopes targeted by antibodies elicited in response to infectious diseases is important for developing vaccines and diagnostics. However, techniques for broadly exploring the specificity of antibodies in a rapid manner are lacking, limiting our ability to quickly respond to emerging viruses. We previously reported a technology that couples deep sequencing technology with a bacteriophage MS2 virus-like particle (VLP) peptide display platform for identifying pathogen-specific antibody responses. Here, we describe refinements that expand the number of patient samples that can be processed at one time, increasing the utility of this technology for rapidly responding to emerging infectious diseases. We used dengue virus (DENV) as a model system since much is already known about the antibody response. Sera from primary DENV-infected patients (n = 28) were used to pan an MS2 bacteriophage VLP library displaying all possible 10-amino-acid peptides from the DENV polypeptide. Selected VLPs were identified by deep sequencing and further investigated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We identified previously described immunodominant regions of envelope and nonstructural protein-1, as well as a number of other epitopes. Our refinement of the deep sequence-coupled biopanning technology expands the utility of this approach for rapidly investigating the specificity of antibody responses to infectious diseases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibody Responses to Viral Infections)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2711 KiB  
Article
Characterisation of SARS-CoV-2 Lentiviral Pseudotypes and Correlation between Pseudotype-Based Neutralisation Assays and Live Virus-Based Micro Neutralisation Assays
by Inesa Hyseni, Eleonora Molesti, Linda Benincasa, Pietro Piu, Elisa Casa, Nigel J Temperton, Alessandro Manenti and Emanuele Montomoli
Viruses 2020, 12(9), 1011; https://doi.org/10.3390/v12091011 - 10 Sep 2020
Cited by 43 | Viewed by 5831
Abstract
The recent outbreak of a novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and its rapid spread across the continents has generated an urgent need for assays to detect the neutralising activity of human sera or human monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and to evaluate the serological [...] Read more.
The recent outbreak of a novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and its rapid spread across the continents has generated an urgent need for assays to detect the neutralising activity of human sera or human monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and to evaluate the serological immunity in humans. Since the accessibility of live virus microneutralisation (MN) assays with SARS-CoV-2 is limited and requires enhanced bio-containment, the approach based on “pseudotyping” can be considered a useful complement to other serological assays. After fully characterising lentiviral pseudotypes bearing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, we employed them in pseudotype-based neutralisation assays in order to profile the neutralising activity of human serum samples from an Italian sero-epidemiological study. The results obtained with pseudotype-based neutralisation assays mirrored those obtained when the same panel of sera was tested against the wild type virus, showing an evident convergence of the pseudotype-based neutralisation and MN results. The overall results lead to the conclusion that the pseudotype-based neutralisation assay is a valid alternative to using the wild-type strain, and although this system needs to be optimised and standardised, it can not only complement the classical serological methods, but also allows serological assessments to be made when other methods cannot be employed, especially in a human pandemic context. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibody Responses to Viral Infections)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop