Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

During the last decades, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used to describe the use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary support in the ICU. Over the years the use of ECMO has expanded from neonates to adults and consists of pulmonary, cardiac, or combined support. Initially ECMO was applied when patients were on maximal conventional support and were considered to be moribund. The initial results in the neonatal population showed a mortality reduction from the predicted greater than 90% risk of mortality to a greater than 50% survival rate. In 1989 the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) was voluntarily formed to pool data and knowledge from all active ECMO centers.

Our Topic, together with the journals (Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, Journal of Clinical Medicine, Medicina, Membranes, Advances in Respiratory Medicine) provide a platform for researchers around the globe to share the novel and cutting-edge works about extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Topics include, but are not limited to, the following: extracorporeal CO₂ removal, extracorporeal life support, membrane biocompatibility, ECMO transportation, anticoagulation strategies, membrane imaging. Authors are invited to submit their latest results: original research papers, reviews (narrative, systematic), or case reports are welcome.

Prof. Dr. Patrick Honore
Prof. Dr. Isabelle Michaux
Topic Editors

Keywords

Participating Journals

Journal Name	Impact Factor	CiteScore	Launched Year	First Decision (median)	APC
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease jcdd	2.4	2.6	2014	22.9 Days	CHF 2700	Submit
Journal of Clinical Medicine jcm	3.0	5.7	2012	17.3 Days	CHF 2600	Submit
Medicina medicina	2.4	3.3	1920	17.8 Days	CHF 2200	Submit
Membranes membranes	3.3	6.1	2011	16.6 Days	CHF 2200	Submit
Advances in Respiratory Medicine arm	1.8	2.6	1909	25.3 Days	CHF 1300	Submit

MDPI Topics is cooperating with Preprints.org and has built a direct connection between MDPI journals and Preprints.org. Authors are encouraged to enjoy the benefits by posting a preprint at Preprints.org prior to publication:

1. Immediately share your ideas ahead of publication and establish your research priority;
2. Protect your idea from being stolen with this time-stamped preprint article;
3. Enhance the exposure and impact of your research;
4. Receive feedback from your peers in advance;
5. Have it indexed in Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results

Content type Publication Date

Result details

Normal Extended Compact

Journals

All JCDD JCM Medicina Membranes ARM

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less

Select all

Export citation of selected articles as:

Plain Text BibTeX BibTeX (without abstracts) Endnote Endnote (without abstracts) Tab-delimited RIS

Error

Oops... you haven't selected anything for export.

Ok

clear

11 pages, 233 KiB  

Open AccessArticle

Comparison of ECMO, IABP and ECMO + IABP in the Postoperative Period in Patients with Postcardiotomy Shock

by Cagdas Baran, Evren Ozcinar, Ahmet Kayan, Nur Dikmen, Canan Soykan Baran and Mustafa Bahadir Inan

J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2024, 11(9), 283; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11090283 - 8 Sep 2024

Viewed by 663

Abstract

Background: This study aims to assess the outcomes and complications of patients who received veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support after cardiac surgery at Ankara University Heart Center between 2000 and 2023. Methods: We have carried [...] Read more.

Background: This study aims to assess the outcomes and complications of patients who received veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support after cardiac surgery at Ankara University Heart Center between 2000 and 2023. Methods: We have carried out a retrospective analysis that included 255 patients. Among them, 98 received IABP, 103 received VA-ECMO, and 54 received both VA-ECMO and IABP. Preoperative and postoperative assessments were carried out, including evaluations of left ventricular function and serum creatinine levels. Primary outcomes included 30-day survival and successful VA-ECMO weaning. Complications such as bleeding, sepsis, liver failure, wound infection, and peripheral ischemia were also assessed. Results: The weaning rate from VA-ECMO was significantly higher in the combined VA-ECMO and IABP group (81.4%) compared with the other groups (p = 0.004). One-year survival was also higher in the combined group (75.9%) (p = 0.002). Complications or renal function did not differ significantly among the groups. The primary indication for mechanical support was coronary artery bypass grafting. Conclusions: In conclusion, the combined use of VA-ECMO and IABP therapy led to improved weaning and survival rates without increasing the risk of complications. These findings suggest that a combined approach may be beneficial for selected patients with severe cardiac dysfunction post surgery. Full article

(This article belongs to the Topic Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO))

10 pages, 1967 KiB  

Open AccessArticle

Vascular Complications in Patients with ECMO Support after Cardiac Surgery

by Cagdas Baran, Evren Ozcinar, Ahmet Kayan, Mehmet Cahit Saricaoglu, Ali Ihsan Hasde, Canan Soykan Baran, Ahmet Ruchan Akar and Sadik Eryilmaz

J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(17), 5055; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175055 - 26 Aug 2024

Viewed by 481

Abstract

Background: This study assessed vascular complications in patients who received extracorporeal membrane support following cardiac surgery. Methods: We included 84 post-cardiotomy patients who underwent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) from July 2018 to May 2022. Only patients connected to VA-ECMO (Veno-Arterial) via peripheral cannulation [...] Read more.

Background: This study assessed vascular complications in patients who received extracorporeal membrane support following cardiac surgery. Methods: We included 84 post-cardiotomy patients who underwent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) from July 2018 to May 2022. Only patients connected to VA-ECMO (Veno-Arterial) via peripheral cannulation were included in this study. Vascular complications were compared between those who had ECMO placed using the percutaneous technique (n = 52) and those who had it placed via femoral incision (n = 32). Results: The incidence of vascular thromboembolism was significantly higher in the percutaneous technique group compared with the open technique group (p < 0.05). Hematomas were also more frequent in the percutaneous technique group (p = 0.04). Conversely, bleeding and leakage were significantly more frequent in the open technique group (p = 0.04). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of wound infections or revisions in the inguinal area following ECMO removal. The mortality rate associated with vascular ischemia was 81.2%, while the overall in-hospital mortality rate was 60.7%. Conclusions: The open technique for ECMO placement may reduce the risk of thromboembolic events and hematomas compared to the percutaneous technique. However, it may be associated with a higher incidence of bleeding and leakage. Both techniques show similar outcomes in terms of overall mortality and wound infections. Full article

(This article belongs to the Topic Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO))

►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2945 KiB  

Open AccessArticle

Has Extracorporeal Gas Exchange Performance Reached Its Peak?

by Foivos Leonidas Mouzakis, Ali Kashefi, Flutura Hima, Khosrow Mottaghy and Jan Spillner

Membranes 2024, 14(3), 68; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes14030068 - 17 Mar 2024

Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1581

Abstract

Extracorporeal gas exchange therapies evolved considerably within the first three–four decades of their appearance, and have since reached a mature stage, where minor alterations and discrete fine-tuning might offer some incremental improvement. A different approach is introduced here, making use of modern, purely [...] Read more.

Extracorporeal gas exchange therapies evolved considerably within the first three–four decades of their appearance, and have since reached a mature stage, where minor alterations and discrete fine-tuning might offer some incremental improvement. A different approach is introduced here, making use of modern, purely diffusive membrane materials, and taking advantage of the elevated concentration gradient ensuing from gas pressure buildup in the gas chamber of the oxygenator. An assortment of silicone membrane gas exchangers were tested in vitro as per a modified protocol in pursuance of assessing their gas exchange efficiency under both regular and high-pressure aeration conditions. The findings point to a stark performance gain when pressurization of the gas compartment is involved; a 40% rise above atmospheric pressure elevates oxygen transfer rate (OTR) by nearly 30%. Carbon dioxide transfer rate (CTR) does not benefit as much from this principle, yet it retains a competitive edge when higher gas flow/blood flow ratios are employed. Moreover, implementation of purely diffusive membranes warrants a bubble-free circulation. Further optimization of the introduced method ought to pave the way for in vivo animal trials, which in turn may potentially unveil new realms of gas exchange performance for therapies associated with extracorporeal circulation. Full article

(This article belongs to the Topic Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO))

►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1271 KiB  

Open AccessArticle

Severe Lung Dysfunction and Pulmonary Blood Flow during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

by Lars Falk, Marika Lidegran, Sandra Diaz Ruiz, Jan Hultman and Lars Mikael Broman

J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(4), 1113; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13041113 - 16 Feb 2024

Viewed by 845

Abstract

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is indicated for patients with severe respiratory and/or circulatory failure. The standard technique to visualize the extent of pulmonary damage during ECMO is computed tomography (CT). Purpose: This single-center, retrospective study investigated whether pulmonary blood flow (PBF) measured [...] Read more.

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is indicated for patients with severe respiratory and/or circulatory failure. The standard technique to visualize the extent of pulmonary damage during ECMO is computed tomography (CT). Purpose: This single-center, retrospective study investigated whether pulmonary blood flow (PBF) measured with echocardiography can assist in assessing the extent of pulmonary damage and whether echocardiography and CT findings are associated with patient outcomes. Methods: All patients (>15 years) commenced on ECMO between 2011 and 2017 with septic shock of pulmonary origin and a treatment time >28 days were screened. Of 277 eligible patients, 9 were identified where both CT and echocardiography had been consecutively performed. Results: CT failed to indicate any differences in viable lung parenchyma within or between survivors and non-survivors at any time during ECMO treatment. Upon initiation of ECMO, the survivors (n = 5) and non-survivors (n = 4) had similar PBF. During a full course of ECMO support, survivors showed no change in PBF (3.8 ± 2.1 at ECMO start vs. 7.9 ± 4.3 L/min, p = 0.12), whereas non-survivors significantly deteriorated in PBF from 3.5 ± 1.0 to 1.0 ± 1.1 L/min (p = 0.029). Tidal volumes were significantly lower over time among the non-survivors, p = 0.047. Conclusions: In prolonged ECMO for pulmonary septic shock, CT was not found to be effective for the evaluation of pulmonary viability or recovery. This hypothesis-generating investigation supports echocardiography as a tool to predict pulmonary recovery via the assessment of PBF at the early to later stages of ECMO support. Full article

(This article belongs to the Topic Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO))

►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less

Select all

Export citation of selected articles as:

Plain Text BibTeX BibTeX (without abstracts) Endnote Endnote (without abstracts) Tab-delimited RIS

 

Error

Oops... you haven't selected anything for export.

Ok

clear

Displaying articles 1-4