Next Article in Journal
Rare Filaggrin Variants Are Associated with Pustular Skin Diseases in Asians
Next Article in Special Issue
Paraburkholderia tropica Primes a Multilayered Transcriptional Defense Response to the Nematode Meloidogyne spp. in Tomato
Previous Article in Journal
Association between Reactive Oxygen Species, Transcription Factors, and Candidate Genes in Drought-Resistant Sorghum
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens AK-12 Helps Rapeseed Establish a Protection against Brevicoryne brassicae
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 25
Issue 12
10.3390/ijms25126463
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pathogenesis-Related 1 (PR1) Protein Family Genes Involved in Sugarcane Responses to Ustilago scitaminea Stress

by
Talha Javed
1,2,†,
Wenzhi Wang
1,2,†,
Tingting Sun
1,2,
Linbo Shen
1,2,
Xiaoyan Feng
1,
Jiayan Huang
3 and
Shuzhen Zhang
1,2,*
1
National Key Laboratory for Tropical Crop Breeding, Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
2
Sanya Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Sanya 572024, China
3
School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Sanya Nanfan Research Institute, Hainan University, Sanya 572025, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Those authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(12), 6463; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25126463
Submission received: 20 April 2024 / Revised: 4 June 2024 / Accepted: 8 June 2024 / Published: 12 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Defense Response to Microbial, Herbivorous, and Environmental Interactions)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Plant resistance against biotic stressors is significantly influenced by pathogenesis-related 1 (PR1) proteins. This study examines the systematic identification and characterization of PR1 family genes in sugarcane (Saccharum spontaneum Np-X) and the transcript expression of selected genes in two sugarcane cultivars (ROC22 and Zhongtang3) in response to Ustilago scitaminea pathogen infection. A total of 18 SsnpPR1 genes were identified at the whole-genome level and further categorized into four groups. Notably, tandem and segmental duplication occurrences were detected in one and five SsnpPR1 gene pairs, respectively. The SsnpPR1 genes exhibited diverse physio-chemical attributes and variations in introns/exons and conserved motifs. Notably, four SsnpPR1 (SsnpPR1.02/05/09/19) proteins displayed a strong protein–protein interaction network. The transcript expression of three SsnpPR1 (SsnpPR1.04/06/09) genes was upregulated by 1.2–2.6 folds in the resistant cultivar (Zhongtang3) but downregulated in the susceptible cultivar (ROC22) across different time points as compared to the control in response to pathogen infection. Additionally, SsnpPR1.11 was specifically upregulated by 1.2–3.5 folds at 24–72 h post inoculation (hpi) in ROC22, suggesting that this gene may play an important negative regulatory role in defense responses to pathogen infection. The genetic improvement of sugarcane can be facilitated by our results, which also establish the basis for additional functional characterization of SsnpPR1 genes in response to pathogenic stress.

1. Introduction

Climate change powers the risk of various environmental stressors worldwide and has also affected the incidence and geographic distribution of plant pathogenic diseases [1]. Pattern-recognition receptors (PRRSs) allow plants to identify the first layer of conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), which they then use to induce pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) in response to a variety of stressors [2,3]. Moreover, plants selectively detect effectors using polymorphic nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich repeat (NB-LRR) proteins expressed by the majority of resistance genes in order to initiate effector-triggered immunity (ETI) [2,3,4].
Pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins have been revealed to be essential for plant disease resistance in numerous studies [5,6]. Upon pathogen-induced stress perception, various signaling cascades are activated, resulting in the activation of various genes such as WRKYs, which activate the transcription of PR proteins such as PR1 by binding to their promoter region and regulate defense responses by inhibiting the growth of pathogens [3,7]. Among these, pathogenesis related-1 (PR-1) proteins induced by pathogens or salicylic acid constitute the main family of PR proteins [5,7,8]. PR-1s comprise proteins that have a highly conserved structure [5,8]. The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structure of Solanum lycopersicum P14a (PR-1b) showed that PR-1 has a distinct α-β-α sandwich structure that has four β-folds (A-D) and four highly conserved α-helices (I-IV) [5,9]. Recently, Han and colleagues reported that the last 11 C-terminal amino acids of the PR-1 protein contain a peptide with a caveolin-binding motif and CAP-derived peptide (CAPE) [10]. CAPE-mediated signaling facilitates defense responses against pathogen attack, but other signaling cascades associated with stress, such as those elicited by PAMPs, do not influence the CAPE response [7,9,10]. The conserved CNYx motif and tablysin-15 fatty acid-binding residues, as well as a CAP tetrad and caveolin-binding motif, are other additional functional motifs found within PR-1 proteins. The caveolin-binding motif and CAP-derived peptide (CAPE) are present in the conserved CAP domain of the PR-1 protein [10]. Previously, PR-1 family members have been systematically identified and characterized in different plant species, such as 10 in Mangifera indica [11], 12 in Triticum durum [12], 20 in Hordeum vulgare [8], and 86 in Triticum aestivum [13]. A growing body of research has shown that PR1 proteins are essential for plants’ defense against biotic stressors [7]. For instance, the ectopic expression of Mangifera indica MiPR1A in transgenic Arabidopsis and overexpression of Triticum aestivum TaPR1-7 and Solanum lycopersicum SlPR1 attributed to enhanced disease resistance in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Puccinia striiformis f. sp. Tritici, and Ralstonia solanacearum, respectively [11,13,14].
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) is a major dual-purpose cash and biofuel crop worldwide [15]. The highly polyploid and aneuploid modern sugarcane cultivars (Saccharum spp. Hybrid, 2n = 100–130) are derived from interspecific hybridization between S. officinarum (2n = 8x = 80) and S. spontaneum (2n = 4x–16x = 40–128) [16,17]. Additionally, the increased variation in S. spontaneum genome polyploidy levels contributes to the study of the evolution of autopolyploid genomes in plants [17,18]. Importantly, the two reference S. spontaneum clones Np-X (2n = 4x = 40, x = 10) and AP85-441 (1n = 4x = 32, x = 8) have tetraploid genomes that offer a valuable resource to uncover numerous gene families with functional diversity [17,19]. Previously, PR1 family genes were identified in the autopolyploid S. spontaneum AP85-441, and their temporal transcript patterns were examined in response to different stressors [5]. However, no reports are available about PR1 family genes’ responses to U. scitaminea infection in sugarcane. Therefore, this study presents the systematic identification and characterization of PR1 family members in sugarcane (S. spontaneum clone Np-X), with expression profiling in two cultivars inoculated with pathogenic fungi. This study provides a solid foundation for subsequent functional characterization (reverse/forward genetics) of PR1 family members in sugarcane in response to biotic stressors.

2. Results

2.1. Identification, Physio-Chemical Characterization, and Phylogeny of SsnpPR1 Genes

SsPR1 genes from S. spontaneum clone AP85-441 were used as query sequences to search for a total of 18 SsnpPR1 genes in the S. spontaneum Np-X genome by using Tbtools. The finalized SsnpPR1 genes were named based on their corresponding sequence nomenclature from S. spontaneum AP85-441. Notably, the putative SsnpPR1 proteins contained 155 to 291 amino acids, molecular weights ranged from 16428 to 31117 kDa, isoelectric points ranged from 6.8 to 10.1, instability indexes fell between 40.1 and 54.7, and aliphatic indexes ranged from 59.2 to 66.2. Among all candidate proteins, the GRAVY value for SsnpPR1.13 (0.02) was positive, suggesting the hydrophobic nature of this protein (Table 1). A phylogenetic tree was constructed to better understand the evolutionary relationship among SsPR1 genes of S. spontaneum clones AP85-441 and Np-X. Based on phylogeny, all PR1 genes were clustered into four groups. Group A comprised 11 and 12 SsPR1 and SsnpPR1 genes, respectively. Additionally, two different genes from each clone were clustered in groups B and D separately. Group C comprised three (SsPR1.11/15/16) AP85-441 genes and three genes (SsnpPR1.11/15/16) from Np-X (Figure 1).

2.2. Gene Structure and cis-Regulatory Elements of SsnpPR1 Genes

Among the 18 SsnpPR1s, the gene structure analysis suggested that only one intron was present in four SsnpPR1s (SsnpPR1.07/08/09/11), whereas the other 14 SsnpPR1s lack introns. The SsnpPR1s contained one (SsnpPR1.01/02/03/04/05/06) to two (SsnpPR1.07/08/09/11) exons. Moreover, SsnpPR1-7 displayed the longest intron, followed by SsnpPR1-8 and SsnpPR1-9. Notably, SsnpPR1s had between four (SsnpPR1.03/04/09/14/19) and seven (SsnpPR1.07/08) conserved motifs. Interestingly, motifs 1 and 3 were present in all SsnpPR1s (Figure 2). Detailed information about a total of five groups (light-, hormone-, stress response-, meristem-, metabolism-, circadian-, and seed-related) of cis-regulatory elements is given in Figure 3. The highest number of cis-regulatory elements was found in the stress-responsive group of SsnpPR1s.

2.3. Chromosomal Mapping, Gene Duplication, and Collinearity Analysis of SsnpPR1 Genes

Chromosomal distribution revealed that highest number (six) of SsnpPR1s (SsnpPR1.04/05/07/08/09/14) were mapped on chromosome 2C. Moreover, chromosomes 1C (SsnpPR1.11), 2A (SsnpPR1.12), 2B (SsnpPR1.13), and 4A (SsnpPR1.19) had only one gene (Figure S1). Interestingly, one gene pair (SsnpPR1.15 and SsnpPR1.16) displayed tandem duplication, while five gene pairs were segmentally duplicated (Figure 4). Collinearity analysis revealed the evolutionary relationship among PR1 family genes of S. spontaneum clones AP85-441 and Np-X. For example, SsnpPR1.13 displayed a syntenic relationship with one SsPR1 (Sspon.02G0020390) gene from AP85-441. Interestingly, SsnpPR1.05 displayed syntenic associations with two different genes (Sspon.02G0024520 and Sspon.02G0024530) from AP85-441 (Figure 5). Moreover, SsnpPR1.02/09/14/15/18 also had a syntenic association with one different gene from AP85-441. Detailed information about syntenic association is given in Table 2.

2.4. Protein–Protein Interaction Analysis

A strong protein–protein interaction network was predicted among four SsnpPR1s (SsnpPR1.02/05/09/19) based on their orthologs in A. thaliana. Additionally, SsnpPR1.19 was the key protein in this interaction network. Interestingly, no point-to-point interaction was observed among SsnpPR1s (Figure 6; Table S1).

2.5. Sugarcane Cultivar Responses to Pathogen Infection

Based on qPCR data, a significantly high population size of U. scitaminea pathogen was recorded in ROC22 at time points as compared to that in Zhontang3. The highest population size of the pathogen in ROC22 and Zhontang3 was 1470.1 copies/µL and 961.1 copies/µL, respectively (Figure 7).

2.6. Transcript Profiling of SsnpPR1 Genes in Response to Pathogen Infection

The characterization of SsnpPR1 genes responding to smut pathogen was determined by RT-qPCR assay. Overall, the results revealed four different kind of transcript profiling: (1) three SsnpPR1 (SsnpPR1.03/05/19) genes were upregulated across different time points as compared to the control in two sugarcane cultivars; (2) one SsnpPR1 (SsnpPR1.02) gene was downregulated across different time points as compared to the control in two sugarcane cultivars; (3) two SsnpPR1 (SsnpPR1.07/08) genes displayed irregular transcript profiles; and (4) three SsnpPR1 (SsnpPR1.04/06/09) genes were specifically upregulated in sugarcane cultivar Zhongtang3 but downregulated in ROC22 across different time points as compared to the control. In contrast, SsnpPR1.11 was specifically upregulated in sugarcane cultivar ROC22 and downregulated in Zhongtang3 (Figure 8).
Specifically, the transcript expression of three SsnpPR1 (SsnpPR1.04/06/09) genes was upregulated by 1.2–2.6 folds in the resistant cultivar (Zhongtang3) and downregulated in the susceptible cultivar (ROC22) across different time points as compared to control in response to pathogen infection. Additionally, SsnpPR1.11 was specifically upregulated by 1.2–3.5 folds at 24–72 h post inoculation (hpi) in ROC22, suggesting that this gene may play an important negative regulatory role in defense responses to pathogen infection.

3. Discussion

3.1. Genetic Diversity of SsnpPR1 Genes

The PR1 gene family is highly conserved, diverse, and versatile, and the number of members varies from species to species, with significant diversity in structure and function [7]. The number of SsnpPR1 (18) family members identified in this study was lower than that in Hordeum vulgare (20) [8], Glycine max (24) [20], Solanum tuberosum (22) [21], and Triticum aestivum (86) [13]. In contrast, the number of SsnpPR1s was higher than that in Piper nigrum (11) [22], Triticum durum (12) [12], Musa acuminate (15) [23], Allium sativum (16) [24], and Camellia sinensis (17) [25]. The possible reason behind the expansion of PR1 family members might be gene duplication events, which include two major driving forces (tandem and segmental) for the duplication of gene families in plants, particularly in sugarcane [5]. Notably, the results of the current study are in line with those of recent studies, which demonstrated that gene duplication for acquiring new genes in this family genes was a common occurrence in sugarcane [26,27,28]. Due to the complex polyploid nature of sugarcane, functional divergence and redundancy is more frequent, and the unique retention profile of duplicated genes after the establishment of polyploidy might explain a general increase in biological complexity [29]. In addition to duplication events, the influence of polyploidy on mutation rates might also cause insertion–deletion events [30].

3.2. Functional Divergence of SsnpPR1 Genes

Biotic and abiotic stressors have long hindered the normal functioning of plant processes and ultimately limited crop production [5,9,10]. Multiple factors are involved in stress perception, signal transduction, signaling crosstalk, gene activation, and transcription during plant–pathogen interactions that contribute to disease resistance. In recent years, significant progress has been made in understanding and discovering the broader biological roles of PR-1 family members in plant defense. A growing body of research shows that PR-1s are essential for plant defenses against pathogen attacks. The range of regulatory roles in responses to pathogen infection is likely associated with the functional diversity seen among PR-1 genes [5,7,9,10]. For instance, different PR-1 alleles have different regulatory functions against diverse stressors [7]. Specifically, PR1 proteins play crucial roles in plant resistance and defense response against pathogens [7,31]. Notably, several tested SsnpPR1 genes in this study had a positive regulatory role in the defense response against the pathogen in the resistant sugarcane cultivar. Furthermore, the SsnpPR1.02/05/09/19 genes may be essential to the SsnpPR1 protein interaction network and may facilitate the critical link in sugarcane crop defense responses to smut pathogen infection. A number of significant findings from earlier research have indicated that PR-1 functions as a defense protein during plant–pathogen interactions [32,33,34]. For example, sugarcane ScPR1 overexpression in transgenic lines was found to be involved in regulating disease resistance against Acidovorax avenae subsp. Avenae [5]. Previously, Guo and colleagues demonstrated the dynamic modulation of MePR1 activity in defense response to Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. Manihotis in Manihot esculenta [35]. Interestingly, previous findings also revealed the involvement of TaPR1 protein in defense response against Puccinia triticina by interacting with TaTLP1 [36]. Perhaps diverse regulatory roles in response to pathogen infection might be due to the functional diversity that exists among PR1 genes [31]. Importantly, the results of the current study provide a basis for the further exploration of mechanisms associated with signaling cascades mediated by SsnpPR1 genes responding to pathogen infection.
CAPE peptide-mediated defense responses could also function as a trade-off between biotic and abiotic stressors. Results from Chien and colleagues support this possibility by demonstrating that the silencing of PROAtCAPE1 enhanced tolerance to salt stress. Conversely, the same transgenic plants with exogenous application of AtCAPE1 exhibited reduced survival when grown on high-salt media, and this inhibited growth could be due to the downregulated expression of genes associated with salt tolerance [37]. Notably, in wheat, the physical interaction of Triticum aestivum TaPR1 with TaTLP1 via the αIV helix is involved in resistance to the fungus Puccinia triticina (the causative agent of wheat rust) through the C-terminal CAPE1 motif [36]. PR-1 also undergoes partial proteolytic processing as it transits through multi-vesicular bodies, and this proteolysis depends on the presence of an intact C-terminal motif. However, only process-mimicking or non-mutated variants of PR-1 are extravagated to apoplasts. The proteolytic cleavage of the PR-1 C terminus releases protein fragments that modulate the defense responses of plants, particularly modulating localized cell death. Furthermore, regions of PR-1 that remain after processing may have potential roles outside of cell death, such as in host–plant ontogenesis and tissue-localized dependent activities.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Identification and Physio-Chemical Characterization of PR1 Family Members

To identify PR1 family members in the genome of S. spontaneum clone Np-X, SsPR1 query sequences from S. spontaneum clone AP85-441 were used [5]. Based on the similarity index (≥80%) and e-value (0) candidate sequence domain checking was performed using Pfam (http://xfam.org/; accessed on 2 August 2023), NCBI (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/; accessed on 2 August 2023), and SMART (http://smart.emblheidelberg.de/; accessed on 2 August 2023) domain analysis software. Additionally, the nomenclature of Chu et al. [5] was followed for the PR1 family genes found in the Np-X genome. The online ProtParam tool (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/; accessed on 5 September 2023) was used to elucidate physio-chemical properties such as number of amino acids (aas), molecular weight (Da), isoelectric point (pI), instability index, aliphatic index, and hydrophilicity of PR1 proteins.

4.2. Phylogenetic and Gene Structure Analysis

The candidate SsnpPR1 sequences were subjected to MEGA 7.0 software (neighbor-joining method and 1000 replicates) to construct the phylogenic tree. The EvoIView (https://www.evolgenius.info/; accessed on 5 September 2023) tool was used to beautify the phylogenetic tree. The gene structure was analyzed by GSDS (http://gsds.gao-lab.org/; accessed on 5 September 2023) and MEME Suite (https://meme-suite.org; accessed on 5 September 2023) servers with default parameters and visualized by using Tbtools v0.6655 [38].

4.3. Chromosomal Localization, Gene Duplication, and Collinearity Analysis

The SsnpPR1 family members were mapped on different chromosomes by using Tbtools v0.6655. Moreover, gene duplication and collinearity analysis was also performed by using Tbtools v0.6655.

4.4. Protein Interaction Network and cis-Regulatory Elements

The String database (http://www.string-db.org; accessed on 7 September 2023) was used to predict the protein–protein interactions among SsnpPR1 family members and their orthologs in Arabidopsis thaliana. The cis-regulatory elements were analyzed from the promoter region (1.5 kb) of each gene by using the PlantCARE database (http://www.dna.affrc.go.jp/PLACE/; accessed on 7 September 2023).

4.5. Crop Husbandry, Pathogen Inoculation, and Leaf Sampling

Two sugarcane cultivars, ROC22 (susceptible) and Zhongtang3 (resistant), were procured from the Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Sanya Research Station, CATAS/Hainan Yazhou Bay Seed Laboratory, Sanya, Hainan (56.0411° N, 12.7009° E), for this study. Singled-budded sugarcane setts were prepared and soaked in water overnight, followed by drying for two hours at room temperature. The bud injection method was used for sugarcane plant inoculation with the smut pathogen (U. scitaminea). Both cultivar samples were collected at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h post inoculation (hpi).

4.6. Determination of Fungal Population Size by qPCR Assay

The population size of U. scitaminea in two sugarcane cultivars was determined by using TaqMan quantitative PCR assay according to instructions given by Su and colleagues [39].

4.7. Expression Profiling of SsnpPR1s by RT-qPCR Assay

RNA from emerging bud samples was extracted by using megazol reagent (Omega Bio-tek, Inc., Norcross, Georgia) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The complete list of primers along with their sequences is given in Table 3. RT-qPCR was carried out using Analytike Jena (qTower3G), Germany. The reaction mixture comprised 10 μL of 2 × SYBR PremixEx TaqTM (Takara, Kusatsu, Japan), 2 μL of each forward and reverse primer, 1 μL of cDNA, and 6.6 μL of ddH2O to make a final volume of 20 μL. For each sample, three biological and technical replicates were employed. The reference gene was glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), and the expression of each gene was measured using the 2−ΔΔCt technique.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

Using the statistical software program Statistix 8.1, the means of various time periods were compared through the least significant difference (LSD) test at a 5% probability level (p < 0.05).

5. Conclusions

A total of 18 SsnpPR1 genes from the Saccharum spontaneum Np-X genome were identified and classified into four groups. Gene duplication via tandem and segmental events played a crucial role in the expansion and provided valuable information about the SsnpPR1 genes’ evolutionary history. Based on the functional characterization of SsnpPR1 genes as determined by RT-qPCR assay, we proposed that SsnpPR1.04/06/09 may play a positive regulatory role, whereas SsnpPR1.11 may function as a negative regulator in the defense response to smut pathogen. This study also provides a basis for the elucidation of detailed molecular mechanisms in sugarcane in response to pathogen stress using modern biotechnologies such as forward/reverse genetics. Many unanswered questions remain that will need to be addressed by future investigations. These questions include: (i) what signaling cascades are affected by PR1s; (ii) whether PR-1s have direct or indirect inhibition ability toward pathogen growth; (iii) what regulatory networks and/or signaling cascades act upstream of PR1s; and (iv) if functionally similar and/or diverse PR1s can be integrated for the development of resistant transgenic sugarcane cultivars.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25126463/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.J. and S.Z.; methodology, T.J.; software, T.J.; validation, W.W., T.S. and S.Z.; formal analysis, W.W.; investigation, T.J. and W.W.; resources, S.Z..; data curation, S.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, T.J. and W.W.; writing—review and editing, W.W., T.S., L.S., X.F., J.H. and S.Z.; supervision, S.Z.; project administration, S.Z.; funding acquisition, S.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the project of National Key Laboratory for Tropical Crop Breeding (NKLTCB202320), the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund for the Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (1630052019019), the Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (321QN313), and the Earmarked Fund for the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-17).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data supporting the findings of the current research are within this manuscript and its Supplementary File.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Rubab Shabbir for critically reviewing the current manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kummu, M.; Heino, M.; Taka, M.; Varis, O.; Viviroli, D. Climate change risks pushing one-third of global food production outside the safe climatic space. One Earth 2021, 4, 720–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yuan, M.; Ngou, B.P.M.; Ding, P.; Xin, X.F. PTI-ETI crosstalk: An integrative view of plant immunity. Curr. Opin. Plant Boil. 2021, 62, 102030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Javed, T.; Gao, S.J. WRKY transcription factors in plant defense. Trends Genet. 2023, 39, 787–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Javed, T.; Shabbir, R.; Ali, A.; Afzal, I.; Zaheer, U.; Gao, S.J. Transcription factors in plant stress responses: Challenges and potential for sugarcane improvement. Plants 2020, 9, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chu, N.; Zhou, J.R.; Rott, P.C.; Li, J.; Fu, H.Y.; Huang, M.T.; Zhang, H.L.; Gao, S.J. ScPR1 plays a positive role in the regulation of resistance to diverse stresses in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) and Arabidopsis thaliana. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2022, 180, 114736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Islam, M.M.; El-Sappah, A.H.; Ali, H.M.; Zandi, P.; Huang, Q.; Soaud, S.A.; Alazizi, E.M.; Wafa, H.A.; Hossain, M.A.; Liang, Y. Pathogenesis-related proteins (PRs) countering environmental stress in plants: A review. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2023, 160, 414–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Javed, T.; Wang, W.; Yang, B.; Shen, L.; Sun, T.; Gao, S.J.; Zhang, S. Pathogenesis related-1 proteins in plant defense: Regulation and functional diversity. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2024, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yin, W.; Bai, Y.; Wang, S.; Xu, K.; Liang, J.; Shang, Q.; Sa, W.; Wang, L. Genome-wide analysis of pathogenesis-related protein-1 (PR-1) genes from Qingke (Hordeum vulgare L. var. nudum) reveals their roles in stress responses. Heliyon 2023, 9, e14899. [Google Scholar]
  9. Breen, S.; Williams, S.J.; Outram, M.; Kobe, B.; Solomon, P.S. Emerging insights into the functions of pathogenesis-related protein 1. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 871–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Han, Z.; Xiong, D.; Schneiter, R.; Tian, C. The function of plant PR1 and other members of the CAP protein superfamily in plant–pathogen interactions. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2023, 24, 651–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, J.J.; Luo, C.; Yang, X.Z.; Peng, L.H.; Lu, T.T.; Yang, J.H.; Zhang, X.J.; Xie, Y.Q.; Yang, Z.Y.; Xu, F.; et al. Genome-wide identification of the mango pathogenesis-related 1 (PR1) gene family and functional analysis of MiPR1A genes in transgenic Arabidopsis. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 321, 112254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zribi, I.; Ghorbel, M.; Haddaji, N.; Besbes, M.; Brini, F. Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of pathogenesis-related protein 1 (PR-1) genes in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Plants 2023, 12, 1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Liu, R.; Lu, J.; Xing, J.; Xue, L.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, L. Characterization and functional analyses of wheat TaPR1 genes in response to stripe rust fungal infection. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 3362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chen, N.; Shao, Q.; Xiong, Z. Isolation and characterization of a pathogenesis-related protein 1 (SlPR1) gene with induced expression in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) during Ralstonia solanacearum infection. Gene 2023, 855, 147105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Javed, T.; Zhou, J.R.; Li, J.; Hu, Z.T.; Wang, Q.N.; Gao, S.J. Identification and expression profiling of WRKY family genes in sugarcane in response to bacterial pathogen infection and nitrogen implantation dosage. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 917953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ali, A.; Khan, M.; Sharif, R.; Mujtaba, M.; Gao, S.J. Sugarcane omics: An update on the current status of research and crop improvement. Plants 2019, 8, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhang, Q.; Qi, Y.; Pan, H.; Tang, H.; Wang, G.; Hua, X.; Wang, Y.; Lin, L.; Li, Z.; Li, Y.; et al. Genomic insights into the recent chromosome reduction of autopolyploid sugarcane Saccharum spontaneum. Nat. Genet. 2022, 54, 885–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Piperidis, N.; D’Hont, A. Sugarcane genome architecture decrypted with chromosome-specific oligo probes. Plant J. 2020, 103, 2039–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhang, J.; Zhang, X.; Tang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Hua, X.; Ma, X.; Zhu, F.; Jones, T.; Zhu, X.; Bowers, J.; et al. Allele-defined genome of the autopolyploid sugarcane Saccharum spontaneum L. Nat. Genet. 2018, 50, 1565–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Almeida-Silva, F.; Venancio, T.M. Pathogenesis-related protein 1 (PR-1) genes in soybean: Genome-wide identification, structural analysis and expression profiling under multiple biotic and abiotic stresses. Gene 2022, 809, 146013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zaynab, M.; Peng, J.; Sharif, Y.; Al-Yahyai, R.; Jamil, A.; Hussain, A.; Khan, K.A.; Alotaibi, S.S.; Li, S. Expression profiling of pathogenesis-related Protein-1 (PR-1) genes from Solanum tuberosum reveals its critical role in Phytophthora infestans infection. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 161, 105290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kattupalli, D.; Srinivasan, A.; Soniya, E.V. A genome-wide analysis of pathogenesis-related protein-1 (PR-1) genes from Piper nigrum reveals its critical role during Phytophthora capsici infection. Genes 2021, 12, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Anuradha, C.; Chandrasekar, A.; Backiyarani, S.; Thangavelu, R.; Giribabu, P.; Uma, S. Genome-wide analysis of pathogenesis-related protein 1 (PR-1) gene family from Musa spp. and its role in defense response during stresses. Gene 2022, 821, 146334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Anisimova, O.K.; Shchennikova, A.V.; Kochieva, E.Z.; Filyushin, M.A. Pathogenesis-related genes of PR1, PR2, PR4, and PR5 families are involved in the response to Fusarium infection in garlic (Allium sativum L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, Q.; Guo, N.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Liu, S. Genome-Wide characterization and expression analysis of pathogenesis-related 1 (PR-1) gene family in tea plant (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) in response to blister-blight disease stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ali, A.; Javed, T.; Zaheer, U.; Zhou, J.R.; Huang, M.T.; Fu, H.Y.; Gao, S.J. Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of the bHLH transcription factor gene family in Saccharum spontaneum under bacterial pathogen stimuli. Trop. Plant Biol. 2021, 14, 283–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ali, A.; Chu, N.; Ma, P.; Javed, T.; Zaheer, U.; Huang, M.T.; Fu, H.Y.; Gao, S.J. Genome-wide analysis of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase gene family expression in response to biotic and abiotic stresses in sugarcane. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 171, 86–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhou, J.R.; Li, J.; Lin, J.X.; Xu, H.M.; Chu, N.; Wang, Q.N.; Gao, S.J. Genome-wide characterization of cys-tathionine-β-synthase domain-containing proteins in sugarcane reveals their role in defense responses under multiple stressors. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 985653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Li, J.; Zhao, J.Y.; Shi, Y.; Fu, H.Y.; Huang, M.T.; Meng, J.Y.; Gao, S.J. Systematic and functional analysis of non-specific lipid transfer protein family genes in sugarcane under Xanthomonas albilineans infection and salicylic acid treatment. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1014266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, S.-J.; Park, J.-S.; Shin, Y.-H.; Park, Y.-D. Identification and validation of genetic variations in transgenic chinese cabbage plants (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis) by next-generation sequencing. Genes 2021, 12, 621. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang, P.; Zhou, J.; Sun, W.; Li, H.; Li, D.; Zhuge, Q. Characteristics and function of the pathogenesis-related protein 1 gene family in poplar. Plant Sci. 2023, 336, 111857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Aboulila, A.A. Efficiency of plant growth regulators as inducers for improve systemic acquired resistance against stripe rust disease caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici in wheat through up-regulation of PR-1 and PR-4 genes expression. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2022, 121, 101882. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhao, T.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhang, B.; Chen, Q.; Liu, L.; Yan, L.; Yang, Y.; Meng, Q.; Huang, J.; et al. Transcriptome mapping related genes encoding PR1 protein involved in necrotic symptoms to soybean mosaic virus infection. Mol. Breed. 2023, 43, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Luo, X.; Tian, T.; Feng, L.; Yang, X.; Li, L.; Tan, X.; Wu, W.; Li, Z.; Treves, H.; Serneels, F.; et al. Pathogenesis-related protein 1 suppresses oomycete pathogen by targeting against AMPK kinase complex. J. Adv. Res. 2023, 43, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Guo, J.; Bai, Y.; Wei, Y.; Dong, Y.; Zeng, H.; Reiter, R.J.; Shi, H. Fine-tuning of pathogenesis-related protein 1 (PR1) activity by the melatonin biosynthetic enzyme ASMT2 in defense response to cassava bacterial blight. J. Pineal Res. 2022, 72, e12784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, F.; Shen, S.; Zhao, C.; Cui, Z.; Meng, L.; Wu, W.; Liu, D.; Wang, H. TaPR1 interacts with TaTLP1 via the αIV helix to be involved in wheat defense to Puccinia triticina through the CAPE1 motif. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 874654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chien, P.S.; Nam, H.G.; Chen, Y.R. A salt-regulated peptide derived from the CAP superfamily protein negatively regulates salt-stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 5301–5313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Su, Y.; Wang, S.; Guo, J.; Xue, B.; Xu, L.; Que, Y. A TaqMan real-time PCR assay for detection and quantification of Sporisorium scitamineum in sugarcane. Sci. World J. 2013, 2023, 942682. [Google Scholar]
Ijms 25 06463 g001
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of PR1s from Saccharum spontaneum clones AP85-441 and Np-X based on the neighbor-joining method with 1000 replicates. Red boxes and black stars represent SsPR1 and SsnpPR1 genes, respectively. Group names are depicted by different colors on the outer ring of the tree.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of PR1s from Saccharum spontaneum clones AP85-441 and Np-X based on the neighbor-joining method with 1000 replicates. Red boxes and black stars represent SsPR1 and SsnpPR1 genes, respectively. Group names are depicted by different colors on the outer ring of the tree.
Ijms 25 06463 g001
Ijms 25 06463 g002
Figure 2. Gene structure and conserved motif locations in SsnpPR1s. (A) Intron/exon locations and lengths are shown by gray lines and yellow boxes, respectively. (B) Conserved motifs are shown by different colored boxes.
Figure 2. Gene structure and conserved motif locations in SsnpPR1s. (A) Intron/exon locations and lengths are shown by gray lines and yellow boxes, respectively. (B) Conserved motifs are shown by different colored boxes.
Ijms 25 06463 g002
Ijms 25 06463 g003
Figure 3. Cis-regulatory elements in the promoter region (1.5 Kb) of SsnpPR1s.
Figure 3. Cis-regulatory elements in the promoter region (1.5 Kb) of SsnpPR1s.
Ijms 25 06463 g003
Ijms 25 06463 g004
Figure 4. Gene duplication occurrences between SsnpPR1 genes as indicated by red lines in the inner circle. Chromosome numbers are indicated by the red color outside of gray boxes. Gene names are present on the outer circle.
Figure 4. Gene duplication occurrences between SsnpPR1 genes as indicated by red lines in the inner circle. Chromosome numbers are indicated by the red color outside of gray boxes. Gene names are present on the outer circle.
Ijms 25 06463 g004
Ijms 25 06463 g005
Figure 5. Collinearity association among PR1s from S. spontaneum clones Np-X and AP85-441. Collinearity is shown by red lines. Chromosomes of S. spontaneum clones Np-X and AP85-441 are indicated by brown and green boxes, respectively.
Figure 5. Collinearity association among PR1s from S. spontaneum clones Np-X and AP85-441. Collinearity is shown by red lines. Chromosomes of S. spontaneum clones Np-X and AP85-441 are indicated by brown and green boxes, respectively.
Ijms 25 06463 g005
Ijms 25 06463 g006
Figure 6. Protein–protein interactions among SsnpPR1s based on their orthologs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Different kinds and degrees of interaction are shown by line nodes and colors.
Figure 6. Protein–protein interactions among SsnpPR1s based on their orthologs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Different kinds and degrees of interaction are shown by line nodes and colors.
Ijms 25 06463 g006
Ijms 25 06463 g007
Figure 7. Fungal population size in two sugarcane cultivars determined by qPCR at different time points. Values are means ± standard errors. Means having the different letters above the vertical bars are significantly different at a 5% probability level.
Figure 7. Fungal population size in two sugarcane cultivars determined by qPCR at different time points. Values are means ± standard errors. Means having the different letters above the vertical bars are significantly different at a 5% probability level.
Ijms 25 06463 g007
Ijms 25 06463 g008aIjms 25 06463 g008b
Figure 8. Expression profiling of SsnPR1 genes at different time points in response to pathogen infection. Values are means ± standard errors. Different letters above bars indicates statistical differences among means.
Figure 8. Expression profiling of SsnPR1 genes at different time points in response to pathogen infection. Values are means ± standard errors. Different letters above bars indicates statistical differences among means.
Ijms 25 06463 g008aIjms 25 06463 g008b
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of PR1 genes from Saccharum spontaneum Np-X.
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of PR1 genes from Saccharum spontaneum Np-X.
Gene IDNomenclatureLength of Amino AcidsMolecular Weight Isoelectric PointInstability IndexAliphatic IndexGRAVY
Npp.04C028570.1SsnpPR1.0117318,7327.558.969.5−0.18
Npp.04D024970.1SsnpPR1.0217318,7327.558.969.5−0.18
Npp.02D002590.1SsnpPR1.0315516,4286.840.159.2−0.23
Npp.02C003580.1SsnpPR1.0415516,4286.840.159.2−0.23
Npp.02C003610.1SsnpPR1.0516717,4496.226.776.5−0.05
Npp.02D002640.1SsnpPR1.0616717,5216.126.577.1−0.06
Npp.02C003670.1SsnpPR1.0727328,6948.938.576.5−0.17
Npp.02C003650.1SsnpPR1.0827127,7968.535.979.5−0.02
Npp.02C003630.1SsnpPR1.0921623,2138.856.182.6−0.07
Npp.01C028770.1SsnpPR1.1129131,11710.154.766.2−0.29
Npp.02A009930.1SsnpPR1.1217118,1466.334.766.8−0.11
Npp.02B011150.1SsnpPR1.1317118,0547.630.271.90.02
Npp.02C003600.1SsnpPR1.1417017,9104.438.772.4−0.09
Npp.10C002330.1SsnpPR1.1516718,1898.631.968.4−0.27
Npp.10C002360.1SsnpPR1.1616718,1898.631.968.4−0.27
Npp.04C028540.1SsnpPR1.1718119,1639.950.869.7−0.07
Npp.04D024890.1SsnpPR1.1818119,1639.950.869.7−0.07
Npp.04A034860.1SsnpPR1.1918119,2269.855.966.5−0.11
Table 2. Evolutionary relationships among PR1 family members of S. spontaneum clones AP85-441 and Np-X.
Table 2. Evolutionary relationships among PR1 family members of S. spontaneum clones AP85-441 and Np-X.
Chr2BNpp.02B011150.1.t1 ==SsChr2ASspon.02G0020390-1A
Chr2BNpp.02B011150.1.t1 ==SsChr2BSspon.02G0020390-2B
Chr2BNpp.02B011150.1.t1 ==SsChr2CSspon.02G0020390-3C
Chr2CNpp.02C003600.1.t1 ==SsChr1ASspon.01G0029040-1A
Chr2CNpp.02C003600.1.t1 ==SsChr2ASspon.01G0029040-1P
Chr2CNpp.02C003610.1.t1 ==SsChr2ASspon.02G0024520-1A
Chr2CNpp.02C003630.1.t1 ==SsChr2ASspon.02G0024500-1A
Chr2CNpp.02C003610.1.t1==SsChr2BSspon.02G0024520-2B
Chr2CNpp.02C003630.1.t1==SsChr2BSspon.02G0024500-1P
Chr2CNpp.02C003610.1.t1 ==SsChr2CSspon.02G0024530-3C
Chr2CNpp.02C003600.1.t1==SsChr2CSspon.01G0029040-3C
Chr4DNpp.04D024890.1.t1 ==SsChr4BSspon.04G0002650-2B
Chr4DNpp.04D024970.1.t1 ==SsChr4BSspon.04G0002610-2B
Chr4DNpp.04D024890.1.t1 ==SsChr4CSspon.04G0002650-1P
Chr4DNpp.04D024970.1.t1 ==SsChr8DSspon.04G0002610-3D
Chr10CNpp.10C002360.1.t1 ==SsChr8ASspon.08G0016170-1A
Chr10CNpp.10C002330.1.t1 ==SsChr8ASspon.08G0016290-1A
Chr10CNpp.10C002330.1.t1==SsChr8BSspon.08G0016290-2B
Chr10CNpp.10C002360.1.t1 ==SsChr8DSspon.08G0016170-3D
Chr10CNpp.10C002330.1.t1==SsChr8DSspon.08G0016290-3D
Table 3. Primers sequences used in this study.
Table 3. Primers sequences used in this study.
Gene NamePrimer/Probe NameForward Primer (5′→3′)Reverse Primer (3′→5′)
PR1.02q-PR1.02-F/RGCTCAAGTACACGGAGGAGAAGTTGGAGCCGTAGTCGTAG
PR1.03q-PR1.03-F/RACGGTGAGAACCTCTTCTGGGGTCGTAGTACTGCCTCTCC
PR1.04q-PR1.04-F/RCCGAGAAGCAGTTCTACGACAGTTGCAGGTGATGAAGACG
PR1.05q-PR1.05-F/RCTGTGGCCTTAGCAACCATCATACGTGGCTAGGCTCTCG
PR1.06q-PR1.06-F/RCTGTGGCCTTAGCAACCATCAGGCTCTCATTCCACGACAC
PR1.07q-PR1.07-F/RTCGAGCTTCACAGACTGGTTCGCCTTGTTGTGCAAGTCTA
PR1.08q-PR1.08-F/RTCGTCAACTTGCACAACGAGAGAAGAGGTTCTCGCCGTAG
PR1.09q-PR1.09-F/RTACGACCACGCCACTAACAGAGTCTAGTACGGGCTCTGG
PR1.11q-PR1.11-F/RCCACTATGCCTCACCCATCACTGAGGTGGTGCTTGCTATG
PR1.19q-PR1.19-F/RCTACGACAGGTCCACCAACTTCAGTAGGGCCTCATCCC
GAPDHGAPDH-F/RCACGGCCACTGGAAGCATCCTCAGGGTTCCTGATGCC
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Javed, T.; Wang, W.; Sun, T.; Shen, L.; Feng, X.; Huang, J.; Zhang, S. Pathogenesis-Related 1 (PR1) Protein Family Genes Involved in Sugarcane Responses to Ustilago scitaminea Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 6463. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25126463

AMA Style

Javed T, Wang W, Sun T, Shen L, Feng X, Huang J, Zhang S. Pathogenesis-Related 1 (PR1) Protein Family Genes Involved in Sugarcane Responses to Ustilago scitaminea Stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(12):6463. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25126463

Chicago/Turabian Style

Javed, Talha, Wenzhi Wang, Tingting Sun, Linbo Shen, Xiaoyan Feng, Jiayan Huang, and Shuzhen Zhang. 2024. "Pathogenesis-Related 1 (PR1) Protein Family Genes Involved in Sugarcane Responses to Ustilago scitaminea Stress" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 12: 6463. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25126463

APA Style

Javed, T., Wang, W., Sun, T., Shen, L., Feng, X., Huang, J., & Zhang, S. (2024). Pathogenesis-Related 1 (PR1) Protein Family Genes Involved in Sugarcane Responses to Ustilago scitaminea Stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(12), 6463. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25126463

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop