Next Article in Journal
Studying Pathogenetic Contribution of a Variant of Unknown Significance, p.M659I (c.1977G > A) in MYH7, to the Development of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Using CRISPR/Cas9-Engineered Isogenic Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Dysfunctional Parvalbumin Neurons in Schizophrenia and the Pathway to the Clinical Application of Kv3 Channel Modulators
Previous Article in Special Issue
Uncovering PheCLE1 and PheCLE10 Promoting Root Development Based on Genome-Wide Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Analysis of the Gibberellin-Oxidases Family Members in Four Prunus Species and a Functional Analysis of PmGA2ox8 in Plant Height

Beijing Key Laboratory of Ornamental Plants Germplasm Innovation & Molecular Breeding, National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, State Key Laboratory of Efficient Production of Forest Resources, Beijing Laboratory of Urban and Rural Ecological Environment, Engineering Research Center of Landscape Environment of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding in Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants of Ministry of Education, School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(16), 8697; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168697
Submission received: 4 July 2024 / Revised: 24 July 2024 / Accepted: 6 August 2024 / Published: 9 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Forest Tree Physiology, Breeding and Genetic Research 2.0)

Abstract

:
Gibberellins (GAs), enzymes that play a significant role in plant growth and development, and their levels in plants could be regulated by gibberellin-oxidases (GAoxs). As important fruit trees and ornamental plants, the study of the mechanism of plant architecture formation of the Prunus genus is crucial. Here, 85 GAox genes were identified from P. mume, P. armeniaca, P. salicina, and P. persica, and they were classified into six subgroups. Conserved motif and gene structure analysis showed that GAoxs were conserved in the four Prunus species. Collinearity analysis revealed two fragment replication events of PmGAoxs in the P. mume genome. Promoter cis-elements analysis revealed 24 PmGAoxs contained hormone-responsive elements and development regulatory elements. The expression profile indicated that PmGAoxs have tissue expression specificity, and GA levels during the dormancy stage of flower buds were controlled by certain PmGAoxs. After being treated with IAA or GA3, the transcription level of PmGA2ox8 in stems was significantly increased and showed a differential expression level between upright and weeping stems. GUS activity driven by PmGA2ox8 promoter was detected in roots, stems, leaves, and flower organs of Arabidopsis. PmGA2ox8 overexpression in Arabidopsis leads to dwarfing phenotype, increased number of rosette leaves but decreased leaf area, and delayed flowering. Our results showed that GAoxs were conserved in Prunus species, and PmGA2ox8 played an essential role in regulating plant height.

1. Introduction

Gibberellins (GAs), a kind of hormone widely existing in plants, plays an indispensable role in the stress response and growth of plants, such as seed germination, root and stem growth, and leaf and fruit development [1,2,3,4,5,6]. At present, a total of 136 types of GAs have been identified, which can be divided into C19-GAs groups and C20-GAs groups according to the number of carbon atoms [7,8]. However, only GA1, GA3, GA4, and GA7 are biologically active; the rest are intermediates in gibberellin synthesis or metabolism (Olszewski et al., 2002). The synthesis of bioactive and most intermediate GAs is catalyzed by GA 20-oxidases (GA20ox) and GA 3-oxidases (GA3ox), while GA 2-oxidases (GA2ox) catalyze GA deactivation [9,10]. These oxidases belong to the 2OG-Fe (II) oxygenase superfamily. The gene encoding GA2ox was initially obtained from runner beans, and GA3ox and GA20ox were isolated from Arabidopsis and pumpkin, respectively [11,12,13,14]. The whole genome identification of GA2ox, GA3ox, and GA20ox has been performed in some woody plants, such as grape, apple, tulip tree, and Camellia sinensis [15,16,17,18]. Moreover, functional analyses of GAoxs have been performed in numerous woody plants [19,20,21,22].
GA20ox enzymes are mainly involved in the process of C20-GAs removing C atoms attached to C-20 to convert into C19-GAs. Two crucial bioactive GA precursors, GA9 and GA20, are produced by this process [23,24]. The well-known “Green Revolution” in rice breeding was due to the mutation of OsGA20ox2, which resulted in the sd1 mutant exhibiting excellent traits such as short stature, thick stem, and lodging resistance [25,26]. PdGA20ox1 from Pinus densiflora transformed Arabidopsis and Populus, resulting in accelerated stem growth and increased biomass of the two transgenic plants [20]. Inactive GA9 or GA20 can be converted to active GA4 or GA1 via a 3β-hydroxylation pathway catalyzed by GA3ox [23,24]. In Arabidopsis, AtGA3ox3 and AtGA3ox4 were involved in the production of GAs for reproductive development, while AtGA3ox1 and AtGA3ox2 function in the whole growth and development process of plants. AtGA3ox1 and AtGA3ox2 double mutants exhibited dwarfing phenotypes, and seed germination and root growth were impeded [27]. Similarly, pumpkins (Cucurbita moschata) exhibiting dwarfing phenotypes were found to be due to mutations in the GA3ox homologs [28]. Bioactive GA4 and GA1 can be transformed into inactive GAs by GA2ox. According to the different substrates, GA2ox can be divided into C19-GA2ox and C20-GA2ox, which act on the C19-GAs and C20-GAs precursor substances, respectively [24]. GA2ox in a transgenic dwarf poplar (Populus tremula × Populus alba) was considered to be a key gene that causes dwarfing [29]. Many studies have shown that overexpression of GA2ox in plants such as Arabidopsis, rice, tobacco, and soybean can lead to dwarfing phenotypes [30,31,32].
Prunus mume, the celebrated ornamental flower tree, originated in China and has a history of over 3000 years. P. mume can be divided into straight branch, weeping branch, and tortuous-branch types according to the tree structure. Numerous studies have shown that GAox genes have a significant impact on the formation of plant architecture, but there are currently no reports on the GAox family in P. mume. Here, we identified the members of GAox family in four Prunus species. Comprehensive analysis including physicochemical properties, gene structure, protein characteristics, and evolutionary relationships were explored. The cis-elements of promoter region and expression profiles of PmGAoxs were also investigated. Furthermore, the coding sequence and promoter sequence of PmGA2ox8 were cloned and transformed into plants, respectively. Overexpression of PmGA2ox8 in Arabidopsis displayed a typical dwarf phenotype, which has great application value in P. mume and provides a great reference for developing a key candidate gene of plant architecture.

2. Results

2.1. Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of GAoxs in Four Prunus Species

Eighty-five GAox genes were identified, with 24, 18, 22, and 21 in P. mume, P. armeniaca, P. salicina, and P. persica, respectively (Table S1). The encoding sequence for GAoxs in four Prunus species ranged from 663 (PmGA20ox3) to 2163 bp (PsGA2ox8). Most GAox proteins had 220–434 amino acids (aa), and their molecular weight (MW) was 24.88 kDa–47.93 kDa, while PsGAox8 possessed the highest amino acids number (720 aa) and the largest MW (83.10 kDa). The predicted values of pI ranged from 4.80 to 8.79, and most proteins were acidic. Furthermore, subcellular localization predicted that all GAox proteins in four Prunus species were located in the cytoplasm. Chromosome mapping showed that most GAoxs in the four species were distributed on chromosomes, while PmGA2ox9, PaGA20ox6, and PsGA20ox8 were located on the scaffold.
To investigate the evolutionary relationship of GAox in Prunus species, monocotyledons, and dicotyledons, the GAox protein sequences of P. mume (Pm), P. armeniaca (Pa), P. salicina (Ps), P. persica (Pp), rice (Os), and Arabidopsis (At) were used for phylogenetic analysis and construction of NJ tree (Figure 1). Based on the resulting NJ tree and the previous classifications of the GAox proteins in rice, 120 GAoxs of six species were divided into six subclasses, namely group I, group II, group III, group IV, group V, and group C20-GA2ox. Group I was the largest clade, containing most of the GA20ox proteins in six species. However, six GA20ox proteins (OsGA20ox6 and OsGA20ox8, PmGA20ox6, PaGA20ox6, PpGA20ox6, and PsGA20ox4) were classified as the group V, and they exhibit greater similarity to C20-GA2ox than to most GA20ox proteins. Group II and group C20-GA2ox contained all GA3ox and C20-GA2ox of these six species, respectively. Most C19-GA2ox were clustered in group III, but two proteins (PmGA2ox8 and PsGA2ox3) were separately clustered in Group IV. These two proteins had the longest branches, and no highly similar sequences were found in the model plant, possibly because some genes in P. mume and P. salicina originated relatively earlier and were not involved in evolution.

2.2. Gene Structure and Conserved Motif Analysis of GAox in Four Prunus Species

GAox with closer evolutionary relationships had similar conserved motif distributions (Figure 2A,B). Motifs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9 were present in most members, indicating that the GAoxs were highly conserved and had a certain degree of functional similarity. Motif 1 and Motif 2 belonged to the 2OG-FeIIoxygenase and DIOX_N domains, respectively. These two domains were conserved in GAox family and played a crucial role in GA synthesis and metabolism. Some motifs exist in specific subfamilies. For example, Motif 8 was absent in group III, group IV and group V, while all members in group II possess it. C20-GA2ox lacks motif 10, except for PsGA2ox8 with an amino acid number exceeding 700 aa, which may be due to fragment loss events that have occurred during evolution. The coding sequence length and exons number of GAoxs were diverse (Figure 2C). Most GAoxs contained two to three exons, but some C20-GA2ox had more than four exons, such as PsGA2ox7 (6), PmGA2ox7 (5), and PsGA2ox8 (16). More genes are less than 3 kb in length and have introns no longer than 2 kb, but some genes, most of which were GA2ox, have a length of over 3 kb and longer introns.

2.3. Synteny Analysis of GAoxs in Four Prunus Species

The syntenic regions within the P. mume genome were analyzed to reveal the duplication events of PmGAoxs, and two fragment duplication events (PmGA20ox6 and PmGA20ox7, PmGA2ox1, and PmGA2ox4) were identified (Figure 3A). Collinearity relationship analysis of P. mume associated with P. armeniaca, P. salicina, and P. persica was performed, respectively (Figure 3B). Seventeen PmGAoxs showed collinear gene pairs with P. armeniaca, P. salicina, and P. persica, suggesting that they evolved over a longer period of time and may have formed before species diverged. PmGA2ox5 and PmGA2ox9 have corresponding homologous genes in P. persica and P. salicina genome, while PmGA3ox4 only in P. armeniaca. No syntenic gene pairs were discovered for PmGA20ox1/4/8/9; we surmised that some numbers in GA20ox were lost during the Prunus evolution process. Notably, some PmGAoxs shared more than one orthologous gene pair with the three other species, such as PmGA2ox1/4/7 and PmGA20ox5/7, which made a significant contribution the evolution of the GAox family in Prunus.

2.4. Cis-Element Analysis in Promoter of PmGAoxs

Forty-seven elements predicted from the upstream 2 kb of PmGAoxs were categorized into four categories, including hormone-responsive elements, stress-responsive elements, light-responsive elements, and development regulatory elements (Figure 4). All PmGAox genes have light-responsive elements, with the G-box accounting for the largest proportion and possibly having a main function in the photoresponse process. Cis-elements involved in responding to abiotic stresses such as low temperature (LTR) and drought (MBS) were discovered, thus suggesting that several PmGAoxs may be involved in response to low temperature and/or drought conditions in P. mume. Ten hormone-related elements were predicted, including auxin (AuxRE, AuxRR core, TGA element), gibberellin (GARE motif, P-box, TATC box), ABA (ABRE), MeJA (CGTCA motif, TGACG motif), and salicylic acid (TCA element) responsive elements. The ABRE and MeJA responsive element had the highest number and were present in most PmGAoxs. This suggested that ABA and MeJA may affect the endogenous GA content in plants by regulating the transcription of PmGAoxs. In addition, a small number of development regulatory elements, such as seed specific regulation (RY-element), cell cycle regulation (MSA-like), meristem expression (CAT-box), and endosperm expression (GCN4_motif) were discovered.

2.5. Expression Pattern Analysis of PmGAoxs

The expression levels of PmGAoxs exhibited considerable diversity across different organs (Figure 5A). Except for PmGA2ox4/7/9, other PmGA2oxs were expressed in five tissues, while in the GA20ox classes, only PmGA20ox2/8 were expressed in five organs. Similarly, both PmGA2ox3 and PmGA20ox8 displayed high expression levels across all five tissues. The expression level of PmGA3oxs was generally low within the five tissues, especially in stems. In general, the expression levels of PmGA2ox1/3/7/8/9 exhibited an upward and then downward trend, reaching the highest level at EDII stage (Endodormancy II, December, flower bud had a 45% flush rate) (Figure 5B). Most PmGA20oxs expression levels showed slight differences from EDI (Endodormancy I, November, flower bud had no flush sign) to NF stage (Natural Flush, February, the dormancy of flower buds had been completely released), but PmGA20ox7 was significantly higher in the NF stage than in endo dormancy stages (Figure 5B). It is interesting that both PmGA20oxs and PmGA3oxs are involved in the GA synthesis process; the transcripts of PmGA20ox1/2/4/6/7/10/11 were the highest at the NF stage, while most PmGA3oxs were the lowest at the NF stage (Figure 5B). However, PmGA3ox5 showed an upward trend from EDI to EDII and EDIII (Endodormancy III, January, flower bud had completely flushed), indicating that PmGA3ox promotes GA synthesis mainly during the EDII and EDIII stage. Most PmGAoxs exhibited lower expression levels in both straight and weeping stems (Figure 5C). However, after treatment with IAA, PmGA2ox6/8, PmGA3ox1/3, and PmGA20ox1/4/6 were significantly upregulated in two types of stems. Moreover, some genes such as PmGA2ox6, PmGA20ox5/8/9 showed an upregulation trend, while PmGA20ox7 was significantly downregulated in upright and weeping stems under GA3 treatment (Figure 5C). These genes may play a crucial role in regulating GA levels in P. mume stem. Interestingly, some genes exhibited differential expression levels between straight and drooping stems under hormone stress. Between the upright and weeping stems treated with IAA, five genes including PmGA2ox8, PmGA3ox3, and PmGA20ox1/4/7 were considered differentially expressed genes (DEGs), whereas only PmGA20ox1 and PmGA2ox8 were considered DEGs after GA3 treatment (Figure S2). It is worth noting that after treatment with IAA or GA3, PmGA2ox8 showed significant upregulation, and differential expression was observed in the two types of stems.

2.6. Transcription Activation Activity of PmGA2ox8 Promoter

To investigate the expression pattern of PmGA2ox8, GUS staining was performed on PmGA2ox8pro::GUS transgenic Arabidopsis at different developmental stages (Figure 6). Transgenic individuals were stained in roots, stems, leaves, pods, and flower organs. GUS activity varied among different tissues, with weaker activity in lateral roots compared to main roots and stronger activity in older leaves than in younger leaves, higher in the calyx and lower in other flower tissues (Figure 6A–E). Furthermore, a relatively weak GUS activity was observed in the fruit pods, but not in the seeds (Figure 6F).

2.7. Overexpression of PmGA2ox8 Inhibited the Growth and Floral Development of Arabidopsis

The coding region of PmGA2ox8 was cloned into the pCAMBIA1301 vector and transformed into Arabidopsis through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. The wild-type (WT) and PmGA2ox8 overexpressing (OE) Arabidopsis lines were simultaneously sown and cultivated for phenotype identification to explore the biological function of PmGA2ox8. On the 30th day, compared with WT, PmGA2ox8 OE lines exhibited smaller leaves, and WT entered the flowering period, whereas OE lines had not yet flowered (Figure 7A). During the fruiting period, significant differences were found between WT and OE lines regarding plant height, number of rosette leaves, and leaf size. The WT reached a height exceeding 30 cm, while OE lines only grew up to 10–15.4 cm (Figure 7B,C). The number of rosette leaves in WT ranged from 13 to 19, with a leaf length of 31.67–34.00 cm and a width of 17.33–18.67 cm (Figure 7D–F). The OE lines exhibited an increased number of leaves (47–63) but shorter length (21.67–28 cm) and width (11–15 cm) (Figure 7D–F).
The 1/2 MS medium containing different concentrations of GA3 and without GA3 were used to sow PmGA2ox8 OE lines and WT seeds, respectively. Hypocotyl length and taproot length of the seedlings were measured at 15 d (Figure 8A–C). In the control group (CK), the hypocotyl and taproot of transformed Arabidopsis were significantly shorter than those of WT. Under the action of GA3, the hypocotyl and taproot length increased, and the length of transgenic lines treated with 0.1 μM GA3 exceeded that of the untreated WT. As GA3 concentration increased, the hypocotyl length continuously increased, but root length did not show a sustained increasing trend, and no significant differences were observed between transformation and WT lines. This may be because roots are more sensitive to GA3 compared to the hypocotyl. Moreover, GA3 had the function of early flowering of Arabidopsis, but the transgenic lines required a higher concentration (Figure 8B). This suggested that PmGA2ox8 may downregulate the hypocotyl and taproot length and flowering period of Arabidopsis by reducing endogenous active GA content. Exogenous GA3 can counteract the negative regulatory effect of PmGA2ox8.

3. Discussion

GAs were important hormones that affect plant growth and development. The synthesis of gibberellin mainly occurs in plant tissues with active cell proliferation, such as immature seeds and fruits, shoot tips, leaf petioles, and root tips [33]. There are differences in the distribution and function of GAs in different plants and tissues. For example, GAs are actively synthesized in the annual shoots of peach; the GA4 content is highest in the middle and lowest in the bottom. The GA1 content gradually increases from the bottom to the tip, while the GA3 content shows the opposite trend [19]. Although all three GAs are distributed in the stem, GA3 plays a greater role in plant stem elongation. The le pea mutant lacking GA1 in the stem showed dwarfism, indicating that GA1 acts on pea stem elongation [34]. However, the internode elongation of poplar was related to the GA4 level, but not to GA1 [21]. The regulation of endogenous GAs in plants was controlled by GAox enzymes, with GA20ox and GA3ox controlling GA synthesis, while GA2ox regulates GA metabolism. Our study conducted genome-wide identification of the GAox family in four Prunus species. There were 24, 18, 22, and 21 GAox genes in P. mume, P. armeniaca, P. salicina, and P. persica genome, respectively. A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the GAox protein sequences of four Prunus species, Arabidopsis, and rice. All GAoxs were classified into six categories, referring to previous classifications of the rice GAox family [35]. Most GAoxs in Prunus could be clustered together with GAoxs in rice and Arabidopsis, possibly because they may share a common ancestor. However, PmGA2ox5 and PsGA2ox3 had the longest clades, with no closely related genes in P. persica, P. armeniaca, Arabidopsis, and rice. This may indicate that although P. mume is the latest to differentiate in Prunus species, it has some ancient genes that were not involved in differentiation in the evolution of some Prunus species [36]. Similarities in structure and motif distribution among closely related genes indicated that GAoxs were highly conserved among the four Prunus species. Among the 10 predicted motifs, 8 are shared by almost all GAoxs, especially Motifs 1 and 2, which belong to 2OG-FeIIoxygenase and DIOX_N domains, respectively. These two domains were conserved in the GAox family that regulate endogenous GAs content in plants. The specific presence or absence of motif 8 and motif 10 in a certain subfamily may contribute to differences in gene function. Two fragment replication events were discovered in the PmGAox family, which may be attributed to the fact that only one replication event has occurred in the evolutionary history of the P. mume genome [36]. Collinearity analysis revealed that most PmGAoxs had homologous genes in P. armeniaca, P. salicina, and P. persica, due to the close genetic relationship between P. mume and the three other Prunus species.
Light-responsive elements, multiple hormone-responsive elements, abiotic stress-responsive elements, and development regulatory elements were found in the PmGAoxs promoter region, similar to those found in plants such as apple, grape, and Liriodendron chinense [15,16,17]. Previous studies found that the expression levels of GAoxs were influenced by factors such as hormones, temperature, and light. For example, after 100 mg/L GA3 treatment of peach, the expressions of PpGA2ox1/2/4/5/6 increased significantly after 2–4 h; PpGA2ox3 was first downregulated and then up-regulated [19]. The expression levels of VvGAoxs showed significant differences in grape treated with different concentrations of GA3 [16]. In our study, transcriptome sequencing data of P. mume stems treated with GA3 for 6 h were used to analyze the expression levels of PmGAoxs, and it was found that the expression levels of most PmGAoxs changed slightly. This may be due to the low concentration of GA used, only 2 mg/L. It is speculated that exogenous GA regulates the transcription levels of PmGAoxs in a dose-dependent manner. Although PmGAoxs are gibberellin oxidase genes, not all genes were found to possess GA-responsive elements. This may be due to the regulation of GA by these genes through other factors on the GA signaling pathway, or the presence of GA-related elements beyond 2 kb upstream of the start codon. IAA responsive elements were discovered in PmGAox promoters, and transcriptome analysis results showed that exogenous IAA can affect the expression of PmGAoxs, which were confirmed in species such as Arabidopsis and peas [37,38]. In addition, previous studies have shown that GAox expression levels in many plants such as Arabidopsis, rice, and pea were regulated by ABA, low temperature, drought, and salt [23]. Significant changes were observed in the expression levels of HvGA2ox1/3/6 in the coleoptile and root of barley seedlings treated with NaCl [39]. After low-temperature treatment, LcGA2ox1 and LcGA2ox4 were upregulated in the roots, stems, and leaves of L. mandshurica [17]. ABA, low temperature, and drought-responsive elements were found in PmGAox promoters, suggesting that PmGAoxs could respond to ABA, drought, and low temperature. However, only one DRE element associated with salt stress was found in the PmGA2ox6 promoter. Whether PmGAoxs can respond to salt stress and through which pathway needs further investigated.
Many studies have shown that GAoxs expression in various species was tissue-specific. For example, BnaGA2ox2c/6b/6d were preferentially expressed in flower organs [40]. CsGA20ox1 was significantly expressed in the root and had a function of promoting taproot and lateral root development [41]. Our study found specificity in the expression of PmGAoxs. For example, PmGA20ox10 was only expressed in roots, while PmGA20ox2 was expressed in roots more than in other organs. The transcription levels of PmGA2ox1/2 were significantly higher in fruit than in root, stem leaf, and buds. Interestingly, the transcription levels of several PmGAoxs showed obvious differences between upright and weeping stems of P. mume. Almost all PmGA2oxs, especially PmGA2ox7/8, were expressed at higher levels in straight stems than in vertical stems, while PmGA3ox3, PmGA20ox7/9 were expressed at higher levels in drooping stems than in straight stems. Our previous study found that in mature annual stems of P. mume, the content of GA in weeping stems was higher than that in straight stems, which was probably caused by the difference in GAoxs expression [42]. GA was believed to be related to the early development of the weeping trait of crape myrtle. LifGA2ox was found to be differentially expressed in upright and weeping stems of crape myrtle, with higher expression in weeping trees than in upright trees in several oranges (including axillary shoot, stem, axillary bud and leaf) [43]. This is contrary to our results, possibly due to different plants having varying sensitivities to GAs. It may also be due to differences in sampling time, as the expression of GAoxs varies during different developmental stages of plant tissues. GA has the function of stimulating stem cell elongation and division to affect plant type. IAA can regulate GA level by regulating the expression of specific GAox. The promotion of GA synthesis or metabolism by IAA depends on different tissues, resulting in different responses [44]. For example, IAA may upregulate AtGA2ox2 at the boundary of meristem tissue to inactivate GA, thereby participating in maintaining the activity of stem tip meristem tissue, or upregulate AtGA20ox2 to increase GA level and promote cotyledon growth [45]. Due to the significant increase in PmGA2ox8 expression in stems treated with IAA or GA3, it is speculated that PmGA2ox8 plays a key role in responding to GA3 and IAA to regulate GA level in P. mume stems. In addition, PmGA2ox8 displayed differential expression in straight and weeping stems of P. mume that were untreated and treated with IAA or GA3. A previous study observed that straight and weeping stems displayed varying degrees of bending under the action of GA3 and IAA [46]. We speculated that PmGA2ox8 is pivotal to stem development and plant type formation of P. mume. GAoxs may be related to the formation of plant architecture in Lagerstroemia indica. The transcript levels of LiGA3ox2/5/6, LiGA20ox5, and LiGA2ox9/19/20 were higher in the lower tissues than in the upper tissues of the curved part of branches, while the mRNA levels of LiGA3ox1, LiGA20ox4, and LiGA2ox8/13/16 were higher in the upper tissues [47]. The expression patterns of PmGAox genes differed among the developmental stages in winter of flower buds. From EDI to NF stage, the GAs (GA1, GA3, GA4) content in flower buds of P. mume first increased and then decreased, reaching its lowest point in the EDII stage and the highest point in the NF stage [48]. The changes in GAs level may be attributed to the transcriptional enrichment of PmGAoxs. The expression levels of PmGA2ox1/3/7/8/9 were upregulated from the EDI to EDII stages and then sharply downregulated to the EDIII and NF stages. Most PmGA3oxs exhibited the lowest transcription level at the NF stage, but PmGA3ox5 expression level significantly increased from EDI to EDII and EDIII. Although the expression levels of PmGA20ox1/2/4/6/7/10/11 were highest in the NF stage, most of them showed weak changes during the four stages. However, the expression level of PmGA20ox7 increased sharply from the EDIII to NF stage. In summary, PmGAoxs played an important role in regulating bud dormancy of P. mume. During the development stage of fruits of tomato, SlGA2oxs exhibited different expression patterns. The transcript level of SlGA2ox1 was higher in immature green fruits than in mature green fruits and red ripening fruits, but SlGA2ox2/4/5 were higher in fruits at the mature green stage. SlGA2ox8 is mainly expressed in red ripening fruits and is almost not expressed in immature and mature green fruits [49].
PmGA2ox8 was 891 bp in length and contained four exons located on chromosome 2 of P. mume. Phylogenetic analysis showed that PmGA2ox8 co-clustered with genes such as OsGA2ox5/6/9/11, AtGA2ox7/8, PaGA2ox3, PsGA2ox2, and PpGA2ox2 in the C20-GA2ox subfamily. Therefore, PmGA2ox8 may have the function of encoding C20-GA2ox. The collinearity analysis showed that PmGA2ox8 had collinearity with PaGA2ox3, PsGA2ox2, and PpGA2ox2. Seven conserved motifs were distributed on the PmGA2ox8 protein sequence, among which motif 1 belonged to the 2OG-FeIIoxygenase domain, which is a conserved domain of the GAox family. Photoresponsive elements, hormone (gibberellin, auxin, MeJA, and salicylic acid) and abiotic stress (low temperature, drought, anaerobic induction) response elements, and plant development regulatory elements involved in meristem and endosperm expression were found in the PmGA2ox8 promoter. In our study, the PmGA2ox8 promoter sequence was cloned and linked to pCAMBIA1301 vector to transform Arabidopsis. GUS staining displayed that the PmGA2ox8 promoter could drive GUS reporter gene expression in taproots, lateral roots, stems, leaves, and flower organs of Arabidopsis with different expression intensities, indicating that the expression of PmGA2ox8 was spatio-temporal specific. The coding sequence of PmGA2ox8 was cloned from the P. mume genome and transferred into Arabidopsis. The PmGA2ox8 overexpressed lines showed dwarfism, indicating that PmGA2ox8 can negatively regulate plant height. This is consistent with results in a variety of plants, such as rice, pear, sweet potatoes, and peach [19,22,50]. Overexpression of PmGA2ox8 upregulated the rosette leaves number but downregulated the leaf area and delayed the flowering of Arabidopsis. According to the previous study, the upregulation of AtGA2ox7 and AtGA2ox8 induced the decrease of endogenous active GA in plants, resulting in dwarfing, delayed flowering, and increased number of leaves [31]. The GA1 and GA4 content in cultivated soybean (with shorter shoot length) was lower than in wide soybean (with longer shoot length), and the transcription level of GmGA2ox8 was higher in cultivated soybean. GmGA2ox8 overexpressed soybean showed a phenotype with dwarfing, shorter roots, and smaller leaf area due to the decrease in active GA content, while knockdown and knockout of GmGA2ox8 increased shoot and internode length in soybeans [32]. Cheng et al. found that PpGA2ox1, PpGA2ox5, and PpGA2ox2 in pear genome could reduce plant height and leaf area of tobacco. Similar to PmGA2ox8, PpGA2ox2 belongs to the C20-GA2ox subfamily. The level of GA4 were lower in PpGA2ox2 overexpressed tobacco than in WT [19]. In our study, the hypocotyl and taproot length of PmGA2ox8 overexpressed Arabidopsis seedlings were shorter than those of WT, but increased significantly after GA3 treatment. In the same way, overexpression of ClGA2ox3 gene from Camellia lipoensis can lead to a decrease in the endogenous activities GA1 and GA4 in Nicotiana tabacum, resulting in reduced plant height, smaller leaves, and delayed flowering. This dwarfing phenotype was rescued by the application of GA3 [51]. Therefore, we speculated that PmGA2ox8 can inactivate the endogenous active GAs in plants and affect the formation of plant architecture. In addition, the germination rate of PavGA2ox-2L overexpressed Arabidopsis seeds was lower than that of wild-type, and the seed germination of OsGA2ox9 overexpressed lines of rice was inhibited [21,52]. However, the seed germination rate of Arabidopsis overexpressed with PmGA2ox8 was consistent with that of wild-type. Similarly, leaf development of Arabidopsis was not affected by PavGA2ox-2L [21]. These results indicated that the effects of GA2oxs on leaf development and seed dormancy in different species were varied.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Growth Conditions

Upright and weeping individuals of F1 population of P. mume ‘Liuban’ × ‘Fentai Chuizhi’ were grown in a greenhouse of Beijing Forestry University. Mature annual stems of upright and drooping individuals were collected and rapidly frozen with liquid nitrogen, followed by storage at −80 °C for subsequent RNA extraction.
Seeds of wild-type and transgenic lines of Arabidopsis were sown in Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (Beijing XMJ Scientific Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) containing 0.7% (w/v) agar (Biorigin Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), 30% (w/v) sucrose (Biorigin Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) and placed at 4 °C for vernalization and then cultured under conditions of 22 ± 2 °C, 16 h/8 h (light/dark) and 80% relative humidity. After 7 d, the seedlings were transplanted into a square pot containing substrate (peat:vermiculite:perlite = 1:1:1) and grown under 16–25 °C, 12 h light/dark cycle, and 60% relative humidity conditions in the artificial climate chamber.

4.2. Identification and Physicochemical Properties Analysis of GAox Genes in Four Prunus Species

Prunus mume genome data were download from the Rosaceae genome database GDR (available online: https://www.rosaceae.org/, accessed on 28 September 2023), while the predicted genome data of P. armeniaca, P. salicina, P. persica, A. thaliana, and Oryza sativa were acquired from the Ensembl Plants (available online: https://plants.ensembl.org, accessed on 28 September 2023) [53]. Sixteen Arabidopsis GA2ox, GA3ox, and GA20ox protein sequences were downloaded from the TAIR website (available online: http://www.arabidopsis.org/, accessed on accessed on 28 September 2023) [54] for querying sequences [55]. The TB tools-II (Toolbox for Biologists) v2.096 software’s BLAST project was utilized to obtain the GAox prediction protein sequences, followed by hidden Markov model (HMM) searches [56] to eliminate amino acid sequences lacking the 2OG-Fell_Oxy (PF03171) and DIOX_ N (PF14226) domains (available online: http://pfam.janelia.org, accessed on 28 September 2023). After removing redundant and repetitive sequences, gene annotation information from the NCBI website (available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 2 October 2023) was applied to identify homologous GAox sequences. Subsequently, we conducted an evaluation of physicochemical properties, including amino acids number (aa), isoelectric point (pI), and molecular weight (MW), utilizing the ExPASy website (available online: http://web.expasy.org/protparam/, accessed on 10 October 2023); meanwhile, subcellular localization was assessed through CELLOGO (available online: http://cello.life.nctu.edu.tw/, accessed on 10 October 2023).

4.3. Phylogenetic and Evolution Analysis

Phylogenetic analysis was performed on GAoxs sequences identified from four Prunus species (P. mume, P. armeniaca, P. persica, and P. salicina), along with 16 Arabidopsis and 19 rice GAoxs [35,57]. Molecular Evolutionary Analysis (MEGA X) version 10.0.5 software was used to align all GAox sequences and then construct the phylogenetic tree with the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method. Eventually, the phylogenetic tree was beautified by ChiPlot (available online: https://www.chiplot.online/, accessed on 15 October 2023) [58].

4.4. Gene Structure and Protein Motif Identification Analysis

The MEME program (available online: https://meme-suite.org/meme/tools/meme, accessed on 20 October 2023) [59] was utilized to predict conserved motifs of GAox in four Prunus species, with a set number of 10 motifs. TB tools facilitated visualization of intron/exon structure of GAox genes as well as conserved motifs of GAox proteins [60].

4.5. Syntenic and Cis-Element Analysis of PmGAoxs

We used the Multiple Collinearity Scan Toolkit (MCScanX) in TB tools to analyze the repetitive events within P. mume genome, and orthologous genes between P. mume and three other Prunus species (P. armeniaca, P. salicina, and P. persica) [60]. The upstream 2 kb sequence of the transcriptional start site of PmGAoxs served as promoter region for identifying cis-regulatory elements via PlantCARE online database (available online: (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 14 November 2023).

4.6. Expression Patterns of PmGAoxs

To reveal the expression patterns of PmGAoxs in endo dormancy stages, different tissues and response to hormone stress, three sets of raw data from RNA-seq were employed: (1) Five tissues including flower buds, leaves, stems, fruits, and roots of P. mume [61]. (2) Buds of P. mume ‘Zao Lve’ (growing on the open field in Beijing) undergoing four developmental stages in winter: EDI (Endodormancy I, November, flower bud had no flush sign), EDII (Endodormancy II, December, flower bud had a 45% flush rate), EDIII (Endodormancy III, January, flower bud had completely flushed), and NF stage (Natural Flush, February, the dormancy of flower buds had been completely released) [48]. (3) The upright and weeping stems after being treated with water, IAA, or GA3 for 6 h, which were collected from the F1 separate populations of P. mume ‘Liuban’ × ‘Fentai Chuizhi’ (Figure S1) [46]. Excel was used to analyze data, and TB tools was used to draw heat maps.

4.7. Cloning, Vector Construction, and Plants Transformation

The coding sequence (CDS) and promoter fragments (upstream 2 kb sequence) of PmGA2ox8 were amplified from the cDNA of weeping individuals in the F1 generation of ‘Liuban’ × ‘Fentai Chuizhi’ with specific primers (Table S2). CDS and promoter of PmGA2ox8 were connected to the pCAMBIA1301 and pCAMBIA1300 vector, respectively, resulting in the overexpression vectors (pCAMBIA1301-PmGA2ox8 and pCAMBIA1300-PmGA2ox8pro::GUS). The pCAMBIA1301-PmGA2ox8 and pCAMBIA1300-PmGA2ox8pro::GUS recombinant vector were independently transferred into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 (Shanghai Weidi Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) for plant transformation. The inflorescence impregnation method was used to transform Arabidopsis. The screening medium (1/2 MS + 50 mg/L hygromycin B) was used to select the resistant lines. Positive lines were verified by PCR detection and qRT-PCR analysis (Figure S2). Specific primers were listed in Table S2.

4.8. GUS Histological Staining

GUS staining solution was obtained from Biorigin Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) X-gluc (50×) and buffer was mixed in a 1:50 ratio to prepare the working solution, which was added to a centrifuge tube to completely cover the PmGA2ox8pro::GUS transgenic Arabidopsis. it was stained overnight at 37 °C for staining, and then washed with 75% alcohol and replaced with alcohol multiple times until all chlorophyll in the plant tissue degraded.

4.9. Exogenous GA3 Treatment

Seeds of wild-type and PmGA2ox8 overexpression Arabidopsis were sown on 1/2 MS medium (Beijing XMJ Scientific Co., Ltd, Beijing, China) containing 0.7% (w/v) agar, 30% (w/v) sucrose, and different concentrations (0.1 μM, 1 μM, and 10 μM) of GA3 or GA3 free and placed at 4 °C for 3 d for vernalization, and then cultured at 22 ± 2 °C 16/8 h (day/night) with 80% humidity. After 15 d, the lengths of hypocotyl and taproot of seedlings were measured. The seedlings were then transplanted into a square pot (with a side length of 10 cm, each pot containing four seedings) and placed in the greenhouse (16–25 °C, 12 h light/dark cycle, and 60% relative humidity) for cultivation. Seven days later, the seedlings were sprayed with GA3 at the same concentration as in the 1/2 MS medium.

4.10. Statistical Analysis

All data from wild-type and PmGA2ox8 overexpressed Arabidopsis were repeated three times to calculate the mean ± standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare the mean values. Fisher’s least significant difference test (LSD, p < 0.05) was employed to determine the mean values difference between individuals.

5. Conclusions

Eighty-five GAox genes were identified in the genomes of four Prunus species and divided into six subgroups. GAoxs among the four species exhibited high conservatism and there were many gene pairs between P. mume with the three other species. Hormone-responsive elements, stress-responsive elements, light-responsive elements, and development regulatory elements were found in the PmGAoxs promoter region. The PmGAoxs exhibited specific expression patterns in endo dormancy stages, different organs, and response to hormone stress. Furthermore, overexpression of PmGA2ox8 in Arabidopsis reduced the plant height and leaf area, but increased the number of rosette leaves and delayed flowering.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25168697/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.Z.; Methodology, X.L. and X.G.; Software, J.Z.; Validation, X.G., L.Q. and K.C.; Investigation, X.L.; Resources, J.W., T.C., Q.Z. and T.Z.; Data curation, J.Z., L.Q. and K.C.; Writing—original draft, X.L.; Writing—review & editing, T.Z.; Project administration, X.L. and T.Z.; Funding acquisition, T.C. and T.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. QNTD202306), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32371947), the National Key R & D Program of China (2019YFD1001500), and Special Fund for Beijing Common Construction Project.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gou, J.; Strauss, S.H.; Tsai, C.J.; Fang, K.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, X.; Busov, V.B. Gibberellins Regulate Lateral Root Formation in Populus through Interactions with Auxin and Other Hormones. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 623–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Serrani, J.C.; Sanjuán, R.; Ruiz-Rivero, O.; Fos, M.; García-Martínez, J.L. Gibberellin Regulation of Fruit Set and Growth in Tomato. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145, 246–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yamaguchi, S.; Kamiya, Y. Gibberellins and Light-Stimulated Seed Germination. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2001, 20, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, N.; Xie, Y.; Guo, H.; Zhao, L.; Xiong, H.; Gu, J.; Li, J.; Kong, F.; Sui, L.; Zhao, Z.; et al. Gibberellins Regulate the Stem Elongation Rate without Affecting the Mature Plant Height of a Quick Development Mutant of Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 107, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shan, C.; Mei, Z.; Duan, J.; Chen, H.; Feng, H.; Cai, W. OsGA2ox5, a Gibberellin Metabolism Enzyme, is Involved in Plant Growth, the Root Gravity Response and Salt Stress. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e87110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Weller, J.L.; Ross, J.J.; Reid, J.B. Gibberellins and Phytochrome Regulation of Stem Elongation in Pea. Planta 1994, 192, 489–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hedden, P.; Thomas, S.G. Gibberellin Biosynthesis and its Regulation. Biochem. J. 2012, 444, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Macmillan, J.; Takahashi, N. Proposed Procedure for the Allocation of Trivial Names to the Gibberellins. Nature 1968, 217, 170–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Olszewski, N.; Sun, T.P.; Gubler, F. Gibberellin Signaling: Biosynthesis, Catabolism, and Response Pathways. Plant Cell 2002, 14, S61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hedden, P.; Phillips, A.L. Gibberellin Metabolism: New Insights Revealed by The Genes. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lange, T.G.U.G. Purification and Partial Amino-acid Sequence of Gibberellin 20-oxidase from Cucurbita maxima L. endosperm. Planta 1994, 195, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lange, T.; Hedden, P.; Graebe, J.E. Expression Cloning of a Gibberellin 20-oxidase, a Multifunctional Enzyme Involved in Gibberellin Biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 8552–8556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Thomas, S.G.; Phillips, A.L.; Hedden, P. Molecular Cloning and Functional Expression of Gibberellin 2-oxidases, Multifunctional Enzymes Involved in Gibberellin Deactivation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 4698–4703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chiang, H.H.; Hwang, I.; Goodman, H.M. Isolation of the Arabidopsis GA4 locus. Plant Cell 1995, 7, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dong, F.; Fan, S.; Ma, X.; Meng, Y.; Zuo, X.; Liu, X.; Li, K.; Liu, Z.; Han, M.; Zhang, D. Genome-wide Identification and Expression Analysis of GA2ox, GA3ox and GA20ox in Apple. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2018, 45, 613–626. [Google Scholar]
  16. He, H.; Liang, G.; Lu, S.; Wang, P.; Liu, T.; Ma, Z.; Zuo, C.; Sun, X.; Chen, B.; Mao, J. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of GA2ox, GA3ox, and GA20ox Are Related to Gibberellin Oxidase Genes in Grape (Vitis Vinifera L.). Genes 2019, 10, 680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hu, L.; Wang, P.; Hao, Z.; Lu, Y.; Xue, G.; Cao, Z.; Qu, H.; Cheng, T.; Shi, J.; Chen, J. Gibberellin Oxidase Gene Family in L. chinense: Genome-Wide Identification and Gene Expression Analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pan, C.; Tian, K.; Ban, Q.; Wang, L.; Sun, Q.; He, Y.; Yang, Y.; Pan, Y.; Li, Y.; Jiang, J.; et al. Genome-Wide Analysis of the Biosynthesis and Deactivation of Gibberellin-Dioxygenases Gene Family in Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze. Genes 2017, 8, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cheng, J.; Ma, J.; Zheng, X.; Lv, H.; Zhang, M.; Tan, B.; Ye, X.; Wang, W.; Zhang, L.; Li, Z.; et al. Functional Analysis of the Gibberellin 2-oxidase Gene Family in Peach. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 619158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jeon, H.W.; Cho, J.S.; Park, E.J.; Han, K.H.; Choi, Y.I.; Ko, J.H. Developing Xylem-Preferential Expression of PdGA20ox1, a Gibberellin 20-oxidase 1 from Pinus densiflora, Improves Woody Biomass Production in a Hybrid Poplar. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2016, 14, 1161–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, X.; Wang, J.; Sabir, I.A.; Sun, W.; Wang, L.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, N.; Liu, H.; Jiu, S.; Liu, L.; et al. PavGA2ox-2L Inhibits the Plant Growth and Development Interacting with PavDWARF in Sweet Cherry (Prunus avium L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 186, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, J. Optimization of Genetic Transformation System and Dwarfing Functional Analysis of GA2ox8 Gene and in Pyrus. Master’s Thesis, Northwest A&F University, Xi’an, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  23. Li, J.; Li, C.; Smith, S.M. Hormone Metabolism and Signaling in Plants; Academic Press: Cambridge, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yamaguchi, S. Gibberellin Metabolism and its Regulation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 225–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ashikari, M.; Sasaki, A.; Ueguchi-Tanaka, M.; Itoh, H.; Nishimura, A.; Datta, S.; Ishiyama, K.; Saito, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Khush, G.S.; et al. Loss-of-function of a Rice Gibberellin Biosynthetic Gene, GA20 oxidase (GA20ox-20), Led to the Rice ‘Green Revolution’. Breed. Sci. 2002, 52, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Spielmeyer, W.; Ellis, M.H.; Chandler, P.M. Semidwarf (sd-1), “Green Revolution” Rice, Contains a Defective Gibberellin 20-oxidase Gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 9043–9048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mitchum, M.G.; Yamaguchi, S.; Hanada, A.; Kuwahara, A.; Yoshioka, Y.; Kato, T.; Tabata, S.; Kamiya, Y.; Sun, T.P. Distinct and Overlapping Roles of Two Gibberellin 3-oxidases in Arabidopsis Development. Plant J. 2006, 45, 804–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Min, Z.; Hu, X.; Han, X.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, D.; Sun, L.; Sun, X. Genetic Mapping and Identification of the Gibberellin 3-oxidase Gene GA3ox Leading to a GA-Deficient Dwarf Phenotype in Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata D.). Agronomy 2022, 12, 1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Busov, V.B.; Meilan, R.; Pearce, D.W.; Ma, C.; Rood, S.B.; Strauss, S.H. Activation Tagging of a Dominant Gibberellin Catabolism Gene (GA 2-oxidase) from Poplar That Regulates Tree Stature. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132, 1283–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Huang, J.; Tang, D.; Shen, Y.; Qin, B.; Hong, L.; You, A.; Li, M.; Wang, X.; Yu, H.; Gu, M. Activation of Gibberellin 2-oxidase 6 Decreases Active Gibberellin Levels and Creates a Dominant Semi-Dwarf Phenotype in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Genet. Genom. 2010, 37, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Schomburg, F.M.; Bizzell, C.M.; Lee, D.J.; Zeevaart, J.A.D.; Amasino, R.M. Overexpression of a Novel Class of Gibberellin 2-oxidases Decreases Gibberellin Levels and Creates Dwarf Plants. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, X.; Li, M.W.; Wong, F.L.; Luk, C.Y.; Chung, C.Y.L.; Yung, W.S.; Wang, Z.; Xie, M.; Song, S.; Chung, G.; et al. Increased Copy Number of Gibberellin 2-oxidase 8 genes Reduced Trailing Growth and Shoot Length During Soybean Domestication. Plant J. 2021, 107, 1739–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Le Bris, M. Growth Regulation|Hormones in Growth and Development. In Encyclopedia of Rose Science; Roberts, A.V., Ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2003; pp. 364–369. [Google Scholar]
  34. Srivastava, L.M. CHAPTER 7—Gibberellins. In Plant Growth and Development; Srivastava, L.M., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2002; pp. 171–190. [Google Scholar]
  35. Han, F.; Zhu, B. Evolutionary Analysis of Three Gibberellin Oxidase Genes in Rice, Arabidopsis, and Soybean. Gene 2011, 473, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zheng, T.; Li, P.; Zhuo, X.; Liu, W.; Qiu, L.; Li, L.; Yuan, C.; Sun, L.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; et al. The Chromosome-Level Genome Provides Insight into the Molecular Mechanism Underlying the Tortuous-branch Phenotype of Prunus mume. New Phytol. 2022, 235, 141–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. O’Neill, D.P.; Davidson, S.E.; Clarke, V.C.; Yamauchi, Y.; Yamaguchi, S.; Kamiya, Y.; Reid, J.B.; Ross, J.J. Regulation of the Gibberellin Pathway by Auxin and DELLA Proteins. Planta 2010, 232, 1141–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ross, D.P.O.N. Auxin Regulation of the Gibberellin Pathway in Pea. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 1974–1982. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ouellette, L.; Anh Tuan, P.; Toora, P.K.; Yamaguchi, S.; Ayele, B.T. Heterologous Functional Analysis and Expression Patterns of Gibberellin 2-oxidase Genes of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Gene 2023, 861, 147255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Li, Y.; Huang, H.; Shi, Y.; Huang, S.; Liu, T.; Xiao, C.; Tian, X.; Zhao, P.; Dai, X.; Huang, T.; et al. Genome-Wide Identification, Evolution and Expression Analyses of GA2ox Gene Family in Brassica napus L. Phyton 2023, 92, 815–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sun, H.; Pang, B.; Yan, J.; Wang, T.; Wang, L.; Chen, C.; Li, Q.; Ren, Z. Comprehensive Analysis of Cucumber Gibberellin Oxidase Family Genes and Functional Characterization of CsGA20ox1 in Root Development in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhang, J. Construction of High-Density Genetic Map and QTL Analysis of Ornamental Traits in Mei. Ph.D. Thesis, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  43. Li, S.; Zheng, T.; Zhuo, X.; Li, Z.; Li, L.; Li, P.; Qiu, L.; Pan, H.; Wang, J.; Cheng, T.; et al. Transcriptome Profiles Reveal that Gibberellin-related Genes Regulate Weeping Traits in Crape Myrtle. Hortic. Res. 2020, 7, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Frigerio, M.; Alabadí, D.; Pérez-Gómez, J.; García-Cárcel, L.; Phillips, A.L.; Hedden, P.; Blázquez, M.A. Transcriptional Regulation of Gibberellin Metabolism Genes by Auxin Signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 553–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jasinski, S.; Piazza, P.; Craft, J.; Hay, A.; Woolley, L.; Rieu, I.; Phillips, A.; Hedden, P.; Tsiantis, M. KNOX Action in Arabidopsis Is Mediated by Coordinate Regulation of Cytokinin and Gibberellin Activities. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15, 1560–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, T.; Zhuo, X.; Li, P.; Qiu, L.; Liu, W.; Wang, J.; Cheng, T.; Zhang, Q. Comparative Gene Expression Analysis Reveals that Multiple Mechanisms Regulate the Weeping Trait in Prunus mume. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wei, H.; Chen, J.; Lu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Liu, G.; Lian, B.; Chen, Y.; Zhong, F.; Yu, C.; Zhang, J. Crape myrtle LiGAoxs displaying activities of gibberellin oxidases respond to branching architecture. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 212, 108738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhang, Z.; Zhuo, X.; Zhao, K.; Zheng, T.; Han, Y.; Yuan, C.; Zhang, Q. Transcriptome Profiles Reveal the Crucial Roles of Hormone and Sugar in the Bud Dormancy of Prunus mume. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Chen, S.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Lin, S.; Liu, D.; Wang, Q.; Cai, S.; El-Tanbouly, R.; Gan, L.; Wu, H.; et al. Identification and characterization of tomato gibberellin 2-oxidases (GA2oxs) and effects of fruit-specific SlGA2ox1 overexpression on fruit and seed growth and development. Hortic. Res. 2016, 3, 16059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Wan, H.; Ren, L.; Ma, J.; Li, Y.; Xu, H.; Yao, H.; Dai, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, S.; Li, Z.; et al. Sweet Potato Gibberellin 2-oxidase Genes in the Dwarf Phenotype. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 313, 111921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xiao, Z.; Fu, R.; Li, J.; Fan, Z.; Yin, H. Overexpression of the Gibberellin 2-oxidase Gene from Camellia lipoensis Induces Dwarfism and Smaller Flowers in Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2016, 34, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xing, M.Q.; Chen, S.H.; Zhang, X.F.; Xue, H.W. Rice OsGA2ox9 Regulates Seed GA Metabolism and Dormancy. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2023, 21, 2411–2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bolser, D.M.; Staines, D.M.; Perry, E.; Kersey, P.J. Ensembl Plants: Integrating Tools for Visualizing, Mining, and Analyzing Plant Genomic Data; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; Volume 1533, pp. 1–31. [Google Scholar]
  54. Swarbreck, D.; Wilks, C.; Lamesch, P.; Berardini, T.Z.; Garcia-Hernandez, M.; Foerster, H.; Li, D.; Meyer, T.; Muller, R.; Ploetz, L.; et al. The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): Gene Structure and Function Annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 36, D1009–D1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yamaguchi, S. Gibberellin Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Phytochem. Rev. 2006, 5, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Finn, R.D.; Clements, J.; Eddy, S.R. HMMER Web Server: Interactive Sequence Similarity Searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, W29–W37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. He, Y.; Liu, W.; Huang, Z.; Huang, J.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Hu, J. Genome-Wide Analysis of the Rice Gibberellin Dioxygenases Family Genes. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xie, J.; Chen, Y.; Cai, G.; Cai, R.; Hu, Z.; Wang, H. Tree Visualization by One Table (tvBOT): A Web Application for Visualizing, Modifying and Annotating Phylogenetic Trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W587–W592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bailey, T.L.; Johnson, J.; Grant, C.E.; Noble, W.S. The MEME Suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, W39–W49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, Q.; Chen, W.; Sun, L.; Zhao, F.; Huang, B.; Yang, W.; Tao, Y.; Wang, J.; Yuan, Z.; Fan, G.; et al. The Genome of Prunus mume. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The NJ phylogenetic tree of GA2oxs in six species. At: A. thaliana; Os: O. sativa, Pm: P. mume, Pa: P. armeniaca, Ps: P. salicina, Pp: P. persica. The I, II, III, IV, V and C20-GA2ox represent group I, group II, group III, group IV, group V, and group C20-GA2ox, respectively. The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on GAox protein sequences from six species including Arabidopsis (16), rice (19), P. mume (24), P. armeniaca (18), P. salicina (22), and P. persica (21), using the NJ method in MEGA X with 1000 bootstrap replicates.
Figure 1. The NJ phylogenetic tree of GA2oxs in six species. At: A. thaliana; Os: O. sativa, Pm: P. mume, Pa: P. armeniaca, Ps: P. salicina, Pp: P. persica. The I, II, III, IV, V and C20-GA2ox represent group I, group II, group III, group IV, group V, and group C20-GA2ox, respectively. The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on GAox protein sequences from six species including Arabidopsis (16), rice (19), P. mume (24), P. armeniaca (18), P. salicina (22), and P. persica (21), using the NJ method in MEGA X with 1000 bootstrap replicates.
Ijms 25 08697 g001
Figure 2. Evolutionary relationships, conserved motifs, and gene structure in GAox family members of four Prunus species. (A) The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on GAox protein sequences from four Prunus species. (B) The conserved motifs of GAox proteins in four Prunus species; different-colored boxes represent different motif. (C) Exon–intron structure of GAoxs. Black lines indicate introns. The I, II, III, IV, V and C20-GA2ox represent group I, group II, group III, group IV, group V, and group C20-GA2ox, respectively.
Figure 2. Evolutionary relationships, conserved motifs, and gene structure in GAox family members of four Prunus species. (A) The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on GAox protein sequences from four Prunus species. (B) The conserved motifs of GAox proteins in four Prunus species; different-colored boxes represent different motif. (C) Exon–intron structure of GAoxs. Black lines indicate introns. The I, II, III, IV, V and C20-GA2ox represent group I, group II, group III, group IV, group V, and group C20-GA2ox, respectively.
Ijms 25 08697 g002
Figure 3. Collinear analysis of GAox genes. (A) Distribution segmental duplication of GAox genes in P. mume. Gray lines indicate all collinear blocks within P. mume, and the red lines indicate segmental duplicated PmGAox gene pairs. (B) Synteny analysis of GAox genes between P. mume and three Prunus species (P. armeniaca, P. salicina, and P. persica). Gray lines in the background indicate the collinear blocks throughout the genome, and blue lines represent the syntenic GAox gene pairs.
Figure 3. Collinear analysis of GAox genes. (A) Distribution segmental duplication of GAox genes in P. mume. Gray lines indicate all collinear blocks within P. mume, and the red lines indicate segmental duplicated PmGAox gene pairs. (B) Synteny analysis of GAox genes between P. mume and three Prunus species (P. armeniaca, P. salicina, and P. persica). Gray lines in the background indicate the collinear blocks throughout the genome, and blue lines represent the syntenic GAox gene pairs.
Ijms 25 08697 g003
Figure 4. Cis-element analysis in promoter region of PmGAoxs. (A) Cis-elements upstream 2 kb sequence of PmGAoxs. Cis-elements with different functions are represented by rectangles with different colors. (B) The number of cis-elements in each class of PmGAox gene promoter region. Cis-elements are divided into hormone responsive, stress responsive, light responsive, and development regulatory classes.
Figure 4. Cis-element analysis in promoter region of PmGAoxs. (A) Cis-elements upstream 2 kb sequence of PmGAoxs. Cis-elements with different functions are represented by rectangles with different colors. (B) The number of cis-elements in each class of PmGAox gene promoter region. Cis-elements are divided into hormone responsive, stress responsive, light responsive, and development regulatory classes.
Ijms 25 08697 g004
Figure 5. Expression profile of the PmGAoxs. (A) The heatmap of expression pattern of PmGAoxs in five tissues (bud, fruit, leaf, root and stem). (B) The heatmap of expression pattern of PmGAoxs in upright and weeping stems treated with IAA or GA3. ‘CK’ and ‘T’ represent the control and experimental groups, respectively. ‘U’ and ‘W’ represent the straight and weeping stems of P. mume, respectively. ‘IAA’ and ‘GA3’ represent stems treated with IAA and GA3, respectively. (C) The heatmap of expression pattern of PmGAoxs during three dormancy stages (EDI, EDII, EDIII) and natural flush (NF) stage in flower buds of P. mume ‘Zao Lve’.
Figure 5. Expression profile of the PmGAoxs. (A) The heatmap of expression pattern of PmGAoxs in five tissues (bud, fruit, leaf, root and stem). (B) The heatmap of expression pattern of PmGAoxs in upright and weeping stems treated with IAA or GA3. ‘CK’ and ‘T’ represent the control and experimental groups, respectively. ‘U’ and ‘W’ represent the straight and weeping stems of P. mume, respectively. ‘IAA’ and ‘GA3’ represent stems treated with IAA and GA3, respectively. (C) The heatmap of expression pattern of PmGAoxs during three dormancy stages (EDI, EDII, EDIII) and natural flush (NF) stage in flower buds of P. mume ‘Zao Lve’.
Ijms 25 08697 g005
Figure 6. GUS staining in PmGA2ox8pro::GUS transgenic Arabidopsis. (A) GUS staining of transformed Arabidopsis in four leaf stage. (BF) GUS staining of leaf, stem, flower, root, fruit pods, and seeds in the fruiting stage of transgenic Arabidopsis.
Figure 6. GUS staining in PmGA2ox8pro::GUS transgenic Arabidopsis. (A) GUS staining of transformed Arabidopsis in four leaf stage. (BF) GUS staining of leaf, stem, flower, root, fruit pods, and seeds in the fruiting stage of transgenic Arabidopsis.
Ijms 25 08697 g006
Figure 7. Phenotypic traits of the PmGA2ox8 overexpressed (OE) Arabidopsis. (A) The phenotypes of PmGA2ox8 transgenic lines and WT at 30 d. (B) The phenotypes of PmGA2ox8 overexpressed lines and WT at 52 d. (C) The stem diameter of the PmGA2ox8 overexpressed lines and WT. (D) The rosette leaf numbers of PmGA2ox8 transgenic lines and WT at 52 d. (E) The leaf length of the PmGA2ox8 overexpressed lines and WT. (F) The leaf width of the PmGA2ox8 overexpressed lines and WT. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three replicates. Statistical significance is based on the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA); significant differences among means (LSD, p < 0.05) are represented by a, b, and c.
Figure 7. Phenotypic traits of the PmGA2ox8 overexpressed (OE) Arabidopsis. (A) The phenotypes of PmGA2ox8 transgenic lines and WT at 30 d. (B) The phenotypes of PmGA2ox8 overexpressed lines and WT at 52 d. (C) The stem diameter of the PmGA2ox8 overexpressed lines and WT. (D) The rosette leaf numbers of PmGA2ox8 transgenic lines and WT at 52 d. (E) The leaf length of the PmGA2ox8 overexpressed lines and WT. (F) The leaf width of the PmGA2ox8 overexpressed lines and WT. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three replicates. Statistical significance is based on the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA); significant differences among means (LSD, p < 0.05) are represented by a, b, and c.
Ijms 25 08697 g007
Figure 8. Phenotypic traits of the PmGA2ox8 overexpressed lines and WT treated with GA3. (A) The phenotypes of PmGA2ox8 transgenic lines and WT seedlings treated with GA3 or untreated at 14 d. (B) The phenotypes of PmGA2ox8 transgenic lines and WT seedlings treated with GA3 or untreated at 21 d. (C) The hypocotyl length of the PmGA2ox8 transgenic lines and WT seedlings treated with GA3 or untreated. (D) The taproot length of the PmGA2ox8 transgenic lines and WT seedlings treated with GA3 or untreated. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three replicates. Statistical significance is based on the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA); significant differences among means (LSD, p < 0.05) are represented by a, b, c, d and e.
Figure 8. Phenotypic traits of the PmGA2ox8 overexpressed lines and WT treated with GA3. (A) The phenotypes of PmGA2ox8 transgenic lines and WT seedlings treated with GA3 or untreated at 14 d. (B) The phenotypes of PmGA2ox8 transgenic lines and WT seedlings treated with GA3 or untreated at 21 d. (C) The hypocotyl length of the PmGA2ox8 transgenic lines and WT seedlings treated with GA3 or untreated. (D) The taproot length of the PmGA2ox8 transgenic lines and WT seedlings treated with GA3 or untreated. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three replicates. Statistical significance is based on the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA); significant differences among means (LSD, p < 0.05) are represented by a, b, c, d and e.
Ijms 25 08697 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; Zhang, J.; Guo, X.; Qiu, L.; Chen, K.; Wang, J.; Cheng, T.; Zhang, Q.; Zheng, T. Genome-Wide Analysis of the Gibberellin-Oxidases Family Members in Four Prunus Species and a Functional Analysis of PmGA2ox8 in Plant Height. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8697. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168697

AMA Style

Li X, Zhang J, Guo X, Qiu L, Chen K, Wang J, Cheng T, Zhang Q, Zheng T. Genome-Wide Analysis of the Gibberellin-Oxidases Family Members in Four Prunus Species and a Functional Analysis of PmGA2ox8 in Plant Height. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(16):8697. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168697

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xue, Jie Zhang, Xiaoyu Guo, Like Qiu, Ke Chen, Jia Wang, Tangren Cheng, Qixiang Zhang, and Tangchun Zheng. 2024. "Genome-Wide Analysis of the Gibberellin-Oxidases Family Members in Four Prunus Species and a Functional Analysis of PmGA2ox8 in Plant Height" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 16: 8697. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168697

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop