Incidence of Post-Operative Pain following a Single-Visit Pulpectomy in Primary Molars Employing Adaptive, Rotary, and Manual Instrumentation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Patient Recruitment and Allocation
2.2. Root Canal Instrumentation
2.2.1. XP-Endo Shaper Instrumentation
2.2.2. Kedo-SG Blue Instrumentation
2.2.3. Hand Instrumentation
2.3. Root Canal Obturation
2.4. Post-Obturation Assessment
2.5. Post-Operative Pain Assessment
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pawar, B.A.; Pawar, A.M.; Atram, J.; Luke, A.M.; Bhardwaj, A.; Kfir, A.; Metzger, Z.; Wahjuningrum, D.A. Apical debris extrusion during instrumentation of oval root canals in primary teeth using manual versus motorized files: An ex vivo study. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- George, S.; Anandaraj, S.; Issac, J.S.; John, S.A.; Harris, A. Rotary endodontics in primary teeth—A review. Saudi Dent. J. 2016, 28, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barr, E.S.; Kleier, D.J.; Barr, N.V. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr. Dent. 2000, 22, 77–78. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Thakur, B.; Pawar, A.M.; Kfir, A.; Neelakantan, P. Extrusion of Debris from Primary Molar Root Canals following Instrumentation with Traditional and New File Systems. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2017, 18, 1040–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Farokh-Gisour, E.; Parirokh, M.; Kheirmand Parizi, M.; Nakhaee, N.; Aminizadeh, M. Comparison of Postoperative Pain Following One-Visit and Two-Visit Vital Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Iran. Endododontic J. 2018, 13, 13–19. [Google Scholar]
- Zanza, A.; D’Angelo, M.; Reda, R.; Gambarini, G.; Testarelli, L.; Di Nardo, D. An Update on Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments in Endodontics: Mechanical Characteristics, Testing and Future Perspective—An Overview. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zanza, A.; Seracchiani, M.; Reda, R.; Miccoli, G.; Testarelli, L.; Di Nardo, D. Metallurgical Tests in Endodontics: A Narrative Review. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schäfer, E.; Bürklein, S.; Donnermeyer, D. A critical analysis of research methods and experimental models to study the physical properties of NiTi instruments and their fracture characteristics. Int. Endod. J. 2022, 55, 72–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zupanc, J.; Vahdat-Pajouh, N.; Schäfer, E. New thermomechanically treated NiTi alloys—A review. Int. Endod. J. 2018, 51, 1088–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Nardo, D.; Zanza, A.; Seracchiani, M.; Donfrancesco, O.; Gambarini, G.; Testarelli, L. Angle of Insertion and Torsional Resistance of Nickel–Titanium Rotary Instruments. Materials 2021, 14, 3744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhandi, S.; Seracchiani, M.; Donfrancesco, O.; Reda, R.; Mazzoni, A.; Nottola, S.; Familiari, G.; Testarelli, L.; Gambarini, G. Nickel–Titanium Rotary Instruments: An In Vitro Comparison (Torsional Resistance of Two Heat-Treated Reciprocating Files). J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2021, 22, 361–364. [Google Scholar]
- Metzger, Z. The self-adjusting file (SAF) system: An evidence-based update. J. Conserv. Dent. 2014, 17, 401–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bayram, H.M.; Bayram, E.; Ocak, M.; Uygun, A.D.; Celik, H.H. Effect of protaper gold, self-adjusting file, and XP-Endo Shaper Instruments on dentinal Microcrack formation: A micro–computed tomographic study. J. Endod. 2017, 43, 1166–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruddle, C.J. Shaping for success everything old is new again. Dent. Today 2006, 25, 122–127. [Google Scholar]
- Pawar, A.M.; Pawar, B.A.; Bhardwaj, A.; Maniangat Luke, A.; Metzger, Z.; Kfir, A. Apical debris extrusion by adaptive root canal instrumentation in oval canals: Full-sequence SAF system VS. the XP-endo shaper plus sequence. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alfadley, A.; Alrajhi, A.; Alissa, H.; Alzeghaibi, F.; Hamadah, L.; Alfouzan, K.; Jamleh, A. Shaping ability of XP endo shaper file in Curved Root Canal models. Int. J. Dent. 2020, 2020, 4687045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lima, C.O.; Barbosa, A.F.A.; Ferreira, C.M.; Augusto, C.M.; Sassone, L.M.; Lopes, R.T.; Fidel, S.R.; Silva, E. The impact of minimally invasive root canal preparation strategies on the ability to shape root canals of mandibular molars. Int. Endod. J. 2020, 53, 1680–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elnaghy, A.; Elsaka, S. Cyclic fatigue resistance of XP-Endo Shaper compared with different nickel-titanium alloy instruments. Clin. Oral Investig. 2017, 22, 1433–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keskin, C.; Inan, U.; Guler, D.H.; Kalyoncuoğlu, E. Cyclic fatigue resistance of XP-Endo Shaper, K3XF, and protaper gold nickel-titanium instruments. J. Endod. 2018, 44, 1164–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, E.J.; Vieira, V.T.; Belladonna, F.G.; de Zuolo, A.; dos Antunes, H.; Cavalcante, D.M.; Elias, C.N.; De-Deus, G. Cyclic and torsional fatigue resistance of XP-Endo Shaper and Trushape Instruments. J. Endod. 2018, 44, 168–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Topçuoğlu, G.; Topçuoğlu, H.S.; Delikan, E.; Aydınbelge, M.; Dogan, S. Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Preparation with Hand and Rotary Files in Primary Molar Teeth. Pediatr. Dent. 2017, 39, 192–196. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Nair, M.; Jeevanandan, G.; Vignesh, R.; Subramanian, E.M.G. Comparative evaluation of post-operative pain after pulpectomy with k-files, kedo-s files and mtwo files in deciduous molars -a randomized clinical trial. Braz. Dent. Sci. 2018, 21, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panchal, V.; Jeevanandan, G.; Subramanian, E.M.G. Comparison of post-operative pain after root canal instrumentation with hand K-files, H-files and rotary Kedo-S files in primary teeth: A randomised clinical trial. Eur. Arch. Paediatr. Dent. 2019, 20, 467–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jeevanandan, G.; Govindaraju, L.; Subramanian, E.M.G.; Priyadarshini, P. Comparative Evaluation of Quality of Obturation and Its Effect on Postoperative Pain between Pediatric Hand and Rotary Files: A Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Int. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2021, 14, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Barasuol, J.C.; Massignan, C.; Bortoluzzi, E.A.; Cardoso, M.; Bolan, M. Influence of hand and rotary files for endodontic treatment of primary teeth on immediate outcomes: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2021, 31, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandrian, R.; Coll, J.A. A long-term follow up on the retention rate of zinc oxide eugenol filler after primary teeth pulpectomy. Pediatr. Dent. 1993, 15, 249–253. [Google Scholar]
- Topçuoğlu, G.; Topçuoğlu, H.S.; Akpek, F. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation in primary molar teeth using three different rotary systems and hand files. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2015, 26, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pawar, A.M.; Bhardwaj, A.; Zanza, A.; Wahjuningrum, D.A.; Arora, S.; Luke, A.M.; Karobari, M.I.; Reda, R.; Testarelli, L. Severity of post-operative pain after instrumentation of root canals by XP-endo and SAF full sequences compared to manual instrumentation: A randomized clinical trial. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rathi, N.; Jain, S.A.; Thosar, N.; Baliga, S.; Ahmed, F.; Mehta, J. Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficiency and Apical Extrusion of Debris Using Two Pediatric Rotary Endodontic Files: An In Vitro Study. Int. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2021, 14, 196–200. [Google Scholar]
- Hartling, L.; Ali, S.; Dryden, D.M.; Chordiya, P.; Johnson, D.W.; Plint, A.C.; Stang, A.; McGrath, P.J.; Drendel, A.L. How safe are common analgesics for the treatment of acute pain for children? A systematic review. Pain Res. Manag. 2016, 2016, 5346819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashkenazi, M.; Blumer, S.; Eli, I. Post-operative pain and use of analgesic agents in children following intrasulcular anaesthesia and various operative procedures. Br. Dent. J. 2007, 202, 276–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, H.S.; Patil, V.M.; Kamath, A.P.; Mathur, A.A. Comparative Evaluation of Instrumentation Time, Obturation Time, and Radiographic Quality of Obturation Using Two Rotary Systems and Manual Technique for Primary Molar Pulpectomies—In vivo Study. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 2021, 12, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pawar, B.A.; Pawar, A.M.; Bhardwaj, A.; Wahjuningrum, D.A.; Rahardjo, A.K.; Luke, A.M.; Metzger, Z.; Kfir, A. Effect of Adaptive, Rotary, and Manual Root Canal Instrumentation in Primary Molars: A Triple-Armed, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Biology 2021, 10, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adiguzel, M.; Tufenkci, P.; Pamukcu, I.I. Comparison of postoperative pain intensity following the use of three different instrumentation techniques: A randomized clinical trial. J. Dent. Res. Dent. Clin. Dent. Prospect. 2019, 13, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manchanda, S.; Sardana, D.; Yiu, C.K. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing Rotary Canal instrumentation techniques with manual instrumentation techniques in primary teeth. Int. Endod. J. 2019, 53, 333–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hou, X.-M.; Su, Z.; Hou, B.-X. Post endodontic pain following single-visit root canal preparation with Rotary vs reciprocating instruments: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. BMC Oral Health 2017, 17, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çiçek, E.; Koçak, M.M.; Koçak, S.; Sağlam, B.C.; Türker, S.A. Postoperative pain intensity after using different instrumentation techniques: A randomized clinical study. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2017, 25, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elheeny, A.A.; Abdelmotelb, M.A. Postoperative pain after primary molar pulpectomy using rotary or reciprocating single files: A superior, parallel, randomized clinical trial. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2022, 32, 819–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajsheker, S.; Mallineni, S.K.; Nuvvula, S. Obturating Materials Used for Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth-A Mini Review. J. Dent. Craniofacial Res. 2018, 3, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brar, G.S.; Bajaj, N.; Bhola, M.; Brar, J.K. Clinical evaluation of root resorption and its correlation with obturation quality in pulpectomized deciduous teeth with different obturating materials: An in vivo study. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 2019, 10, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cleghorn, B.M.; Boorberg, N.B.; Christie, W.H. Primary human teeth and their root canal systems. Endod. Top. 2010, 23, 6–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pawar, A.M.; Pawar, S.; Kfir, A.; Pawar, M.; Kokate, S. Push-out bond strength of root fillings made with C-Point and BC sealer versus gutta-percha and AH Plus after the instrumentation of oval canals with the Self-Adjusting File versus WaveOne. Int. Endod. J. 2016, 49, 374–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alves, F.R.F.; Paiva, P.L.; Marceliano-Alves, M.F.; Cabreira, L.J.; Lima, K.C.; Siqueira, J.F.; Rôças, I.N.; Provenzano, J.C. Bacteria and Hard Tissue Debris Extrusion and Intracanal Bacterial Reduction Promoted by XP-endo Shaper and Reciproc Instruments. J. Endod. 2018, 44, 1173–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Uslu, G.; Özyürek, T.; Yılmaz, K.; Gündoğar, M.; Plotino, G. Apically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Instrumentation with Reciproc Blue, HyFlex EDM, and XP-endo Shaper Nickel-titanium Files. J. Endod. 2018, 44, 856–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
XP-Endo Shaper | Kedo-SG Blue | Hand K-File | p Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | ||||
Girls $ | 11 | 13 | 12 | 1.00 |
Boys $ | 14 | 12 | 13 | 1.00 |
Age # | 5.37 ± 0.83 | 5.61 ± 0.75 | 5.43 ± 0.71 | 0.54 |
Mandibular molar “D” $ | 12 | 14 | 11 | 1.00 |
Mandibular molar “E” $ | 13 | 11 | 14 | 1.00 |
Pre-operative pain score £ | ||||
No Pain | 9 | 8 | 9 | |
Slight | 10 | 10 | 11 | 0.854 |
Moderate | 6 | 7 | 5 | |
Severe | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Time Periods | Pain Score | XP-Endo Shaper | Kedo-SG Blue | Hand K-File | p Value $ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 h | No Pain | 11 | 9 | 3 | 0.009 * |
Slight | 9 | 8 | 11 | ||
Moderate | 5 | 6 | 9 | ||
Severe | 0 | 2 | 2 | ||
p value # | 0.326 | 0.204 | 0.024 * | ||
12 h | No Pain | 23 | 17 | 13 | 0.023 * |
Slight | 2 | 5 | 9 | ||
Moderate | 0 | 3 | 3 | ||
Severe | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
p value # | 0.000 * | 0.001 * | 0.048 * | ||
24 h | No Pain | 25 | 25 | 23 | 0.37 |
Slight | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
Moderate | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Severe | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
p value # | - | - | 0.000 * | ||
48 h | No Pain | 25 | 25 | 25 | 1 |
Slight | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Moderate | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Severe | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
p value # | - | - | - | ||
72 h | No Pain | 25 | 25 | 25 | 1 |
Slight | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Moderate | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Severe | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
p value # | - | - | - |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Thakur, B.; Bhardwaj, A.; Wahjuningrum, D.A.; Luke, A.M.; Shetty, K.P.; Pawar, A.M.; Reda, R.; Seracchiani, M.; Zanza, A.; Testarelli, L. Incidence of Post-Operative Pain following a Single-Visit Pulpectomy in Primary Molars Employing Adaptive, Rotary, and Manual Instrumentation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Medicina 2023, 59, 355. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020355
Thakur B, Bhardwaj A, Wahjuningrum DA, Luke AM, Shetty KP, Pawar AM, Reda R, Seracchiani M, Zanza A, Testarelli L. Incidence of Post-Operative Pain following a Single-Visit Pulpectomy in Primary Molars Employing Adaptive, Rotary, and Manual Instrumentation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Medicina. 2023; 59(2):355. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020355
Chicago/Turabian StyleThakur, Bhagyashree, Anuj Bhardwaj, Dian Agustin Wahjuningrum, Alexander Maniangat Luke, Krishna Prasad Shetty, Ajinkya M. Pawar, Rodolfo Reda, Marco Seracchiani, Alessio Zanza, and Luca Testarelli. 2023. "Incidence of Post-Operative Pain following a Single-Visit Pulpectomy in Primary Molars Employing Adaptive, Rotary, and Manual Instrumentation: A Randomized Clinical Trial" Medicina 59, no. 2: 355. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020355