Next Article in Journal
Robust Energy Management of Fuel Cell Hybrid Electric Vehicles Using Fuzzy Logic Integrated with H-Infinity Control
Previous Article in Journal
Deep Mining on the Formation Cycle Features for Concurrent SOH Estimation and RUL Prognostication in Lithium-Ion Batteries
Previous Article in Special Issue
Estimating the CO2 Impacts of Wind Energy in the Transition Towards Carbon-Neutral Energy Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Economic Analysis of Fossil CO2 Emissions: A European Perspective on Sustainable Development

by
Alina Yakymchuk
1,2,* and
Małgorzata Agnieszka Rataj
3
1
Department of Management, University of Information Technologies and Management, 35-225 Rzeszów, Poland
2
Department of Public Administration, Law and Humanity Sciences, Kherson State Agrarian and Economical University, 73006 Kropyvnytskyi, Ukraine
3
Department of Cognitive Science and Mathematical Modeling, University of Information Technologies and Management, 35-225 Rzeszów, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(8), 2106; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18082106
Submission received: 17 March 2025 / Revised: 13 April 2025 / Accepted: 16 April 2025 / Published: 18 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy and Environmental Economics for a Sustainable Future)

Abstract

:
The economic assessment of CO2 emissions from fossil fuels is gaining importance in the context of sustainable development. Climate change, driven by excessive greenhouse gas emissions, poses a significant threat to humanity, requiring an integrated approach that considers both environmental and economic factors. The European Union (EU) plays a key role in global efforts to reduce CO2 emissions and promote sustainability. This study explores economic approaches to analyzing CO2 emissions in Europe, focusing on trends in fossil fuel use and their economic drivers. The research highlights the connection between economic activity, energy consumption, and emissions, contributing to a better understanding of climate change mitigation strategies. The findings emphasize the strong influence of demographic factors on carbon emissions, stressing the need for targeted policies to address the environmental impact of population growth. This study presents a literature-based assessment of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel consumption in the context of sustainable development, with a focus on Europe. Recognizing the urgent threat posed by climate change, the paper explores how economic and demographic factors influence emissions trends and energy consumption. Through the synthesis of recent research and statistical data, it examines the relationship between economic activity and CO2 emissions across EU countries. Special attention is given to national policy frameworks, particularly Germany’s “Energiewende”, as a successful example of emission reduction through building-sector reform. The study highlights that while economic growth remains a driver of emissions, strategic investments in renewable energy, energy efficiency, and sectoral transformation can decouple growth from environmental degradation. The findings support the need for country-specific mitigation strategies, emphasizing that uniform approaches may not address the diverse challenges faced by EU member states. This work contributes to the broader understanding of climate policy design by linking empirical evidence with policy implications in the transition to a low-carbon economy.

1. Introduction

In the face of global climate change, evaluating carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions remains crucial for developing effective mitigation strategies [1,2,3,4]. The continued reliance on fossil fuel combustion significantly contributes to CO2 emissions worldwide, necessitating an in-depth economic and environmental analysis to assess its broader implications. This study explores CO2 emissions resulting from the consumption of coal, oil, and natural gas, with a specific emphasis on the European region. By analyzing emission trends, key influencing factors, and economic consequences, this research aims to provide valuable insights for policymakers in crafting strategies that promote emission reduction and sustainable development.
The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive literature review on energy performance in the context of climate mitigation efforts in European countries, supported by descriptive statistical data. This study does not engage in empirical regression analysis but rather synthesizes existing knowledge and identifies patterns from raw data sources.
A growing body of research underscores the complex relationship between population growth and carbon emissions, albeit with differing perspectives on causality [5]. Some studies argue that population expansion drives energy demand and consequently elevates CO2 emissions, while others highlight how environmental degradation, exacerbated by emissions, can indirectly affect population dynamics [6,7,8]. Further discourse surrounds the need to limit the expansion of high-carbon industries and advance the long-term adoption of renewable energy sources [9]. Additionally, socio-economic factors, technological progress, and policy frameworks play significant roles in shaping this intricate relationship.
The rapid pace of industrialization and urbanization has significantly influenced global energy consumption patterns, leading to a surge in fossil fuel-based CO2 emissions. Simultaneously, the global population continues to grow, with projections indicating further increases in the coming decades [10,11,12]. This trend raises critical questions regarding the intersection of demographic changes and CO2 emissions, necessitating comprehensive investigations into their underlying dynamics. Preliminary findings suggest a strong positive correlation between population growth and fossil fuel-based emissions, with socio-economic variables—such as rapid urbanization and industrial expansion—further exacerbating energy demand. Additionally, disparities in energy access and consumption patterns across different regions contribute to variations in emission intensity.
Existing scientific literature has explored the role of green enterprises in promoting sustainability, particularly their impact on environmental performance, business innovation, and challenges faced by small and medium-sized enterprises in adopting sustainable practices. Le Quéré et al. (2021) offer a detailed analysis of global carbon emissions, examining the role of fossil fuel consumption, land-use changes, and atmospheric CO2 concentrations [13]. Their findings provide critical insights into global emission trends and their implications for climate mitigation strategies.
The economic analysis of CO2 emissions from fossil energy sources is based on the application of different theories, such as the theory of externalities, ecological economics, and the theory of sustainable development. According to the theory of externalities, CO2 emissions are an external effect, as they impact the environment and public health, but these costs are not accounted for in the market prices of energy produced from fossil fuels. Assessing these costs is an important step in economic analysis, as it helps determine the fair cost of energy resources while considering their negative environmental impact [14].
Ecological economics, in turn, advocates for the integration of economic processes with natural systems. This includes not only analyzing direct economic costs associated with CO2 emissions but also considering long-term environmental consequences, such as climate change and resource depletion. Within this theory, key aspects include resource efficiency and minimizing harmful environmental impacts through regulating greenhouse gas emissions [15].
The theory of sustainable development focuses on achieving a balance between economic growth, social equity, and environmental protection. It assumes that any economic progress must occur with due regard to limited natural resources and the need to preserve ecosystems for future generations [16,17,18]. Therefore, to achieve sustainable development, it is crucial to reduce CO2 emissions from fossil energy sources and transition to cleaner, renewable energy sources. The European Union actively works to reduce CO2 emissions through various economic instruments, policies, and programs. One of the main mechanisms is the Emissions Trading System (ETS), which allows companies to trade CO2 emission allowances. This encourages emission reductions through market mechanisms, as companies that can reduce emissions at a lower cost sell allowances to companies with higher reduction costs [19,20].
The EU also implements policies aimed at transitioning to renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, and hydroelectric energy. Decarbonization strategies, such as the “European Green Deal”, aim to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050. As part of this strategy, the EU plans significant investments in technologies to reduce CO2 emissions and foster innovation in clean energy [17,21,22,23].
The economic analysis of CO2 emissions in the EU also includes assessing the effectiveness of different policies. Research shows that the most effective strategies include not only financial incentives for businesses but also changes in consumer behavior through increased awareness and support for eco-friendly technologies [18,24]. Despite the progress made, economic analysis of CO2 emissions in Europe faces several challenges. One of the main issues is political will, as tackling CO2 emissions often requires significant financial investments and may affect traditional industries. Additionally, an important issue is ensuring fairness during the transition period, where vulnerable populations may be negatively affected by changes in the energy sector [24,25,26]. However, there are significant opportunities for the development of green technologies and innovations in the energy sector, which could lead to a significant reduction in CO2 emissions and the achievement of sustainable development. Since Europe is a leader in the field of sustainable development, its experience can serve as an example for other countries in the fight against climate change [16,27,28,29].
The rapid increase in global population has been widely recognized as a significant factor influencing environmental degradation, particularly through rising CO2 emissions [5,6,8,9,10,22]. This study aims to address a specific research gap by examining the nuanced interactions between population growth and CO2 emissions within the EU context. Unlike previous studies that have primarily focused on aggregate global trends [9,24,30,31,32,33,34,35,36], this research provides a region-specific analysis, offering a more detailed understanding of the EU’s role in global emission reduction.
This study contributes to the fields of energy economics and sustainable development by introducing a comprehensive methodological approach to assess the causality between population growth and CO2 emissions. Moreover, it builds upon the existing literature by integrating theoretical perspectives such as the theory of externalities, ecological economics, and sustainability frameworks, which were previously only briefly referenced. For instance, the theory of externalities helps contextualize CO2 emissions as a market failure, while ecological economics provides a holistic framework for evaluating long-term sustainability. The EU’s leadership in environmental policies, carbon taxation, and renewable energy transitions makes it a valuable model for assessing the broader implications of sustainable development strategies. This study not only evaluates the EU’s effectiveness in emission reductions but also draws lessons that can inform global policy frameworks.
The remainder of this paper is structured as follows: Section 2 outlines the research methodology, Section 3 presents empirical findings, Section 4 discusses key observations, and Section 5 concludes with a summary of the most significant results and policy recommendations.

2. Materials and Methods

The methodology is based on a structured literature review combined with summary statistics from publicly available energy audit and emission data sources. The study follows a specific methodological framework throughout its investigation:
  • This research begins with the compilation of extensive global datasets on fossil CO2 emissions, categorized by source (coal, oil, natural gas) and region. Data on economic indicators, including GDP, industrial output, energy consumption, and population demographics, are gathered from reputable international sources and national statistical agencies (Table 1). The analysis considers data spanning from 1950 to 2023 to track historical trends and future projections of CO2 emissions, shedding light on the evolving relationship between energy use, economic growth, and environmental sustainability (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
  • A comparative analysis is undertaken to compare the fossil CO2 emissions intensity of European countries with global counterparts. The analysis identifies the primary factors driving differences in emission intensity, including industrial structure, energy mix, technological innovation, and policy frameworks. These cross-country comparisons provide valuable insights into best practices and offer lessons for mitigating CO2 emissions while fostering sustainable economic growth. The findings aim to inform policies that balance environmental goals with economic competitiveness.
  • To evaluate the potential impact of policy changes and technological advancements, scenario analysis is conducted. Various scenarios are designed based on different assumptions about economic growth, energy transition pathways, and policy interventions. Sensitivity analysis is used to test the resilience of the results under these diverse scenarios and to pinpoint key uncertainties that could affect future emissions trajectories. This analysis is crucial for understanding how different policy measures could help meet global climate goals while ensuring economic development remains on track.
Table 1. The connection between global population growth and fossil CO2 emissions.
Table 1. The connection between global population growth and fossil CO2 emissions.
YearWorld Population (millions)CO2 Emissions (million tons)GDP per Capita (USD)Population Deviation (%)CO2 Deviation (%)GDP per Capita Deviation (%)
1940230015001000---
19502500180012008.720.020.0
196030002200150020.022.225.0
197037003000200023.336.433.3
198044004500300018.950.050.0
199053275500450021.022.250.0
200061006800550014.523.622.2
201069009000650013.132.418.2
2020780010,000700013.011.17.7
Source: on the basis of [8,9,20,21,30,37,38,39,40].
The world population has consistently increased from 2.3 billion in 1940 to 7.8 billion in 2020, with significant growth seen in the latter half of the 20th century. CO2 emissions have similarly risen, from 1.5 billion tons in 1940 to 10 billion tons in 2020, reflecting the global industrial expansion. GDP per capita grew steadily, reaching USD 7000 in 2020 from USD 1000 in 1940, indicating significant economic development over the decades. Deviations in population growth and CO2 emissions show acceleration in the latter part of the 20th century, particularly after 1980, highlighting the impacts of industrialization and economic globalization [8,20,21,37,38,39,41].
Figure 1. Population of the world. Source: on the basis of [7,20,30].
Figure 1. Population of the world. Source: on the basis of [7,20,30].
Energies 18 02106 g001
Figure 2. Annual carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions worldwide from 1940 to 2024. Source: on the basis of [4,8,21,37,38,39,42]. * Data for 2024 is still being refined throughout 2025.
Figure 2. Annual carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions worldwide from 1940 to 2024. Source: on the basis of [4,8,21,37,38,39,42]. * Data for 2024 is still being refined throughout 2025.
Energies 18 02106 g002

3. Results

CO2 emissions from fossil energy sources are one of the main obstacles to achieving sustainable development. However, there are several economic and environmental approaches that can help reduce this impact. First, transitioning to renewable energy sources can significantly reduce CO2 emissions. Economic data analysis shows that although investments in clean energy technologies may be high at the outset, long-term benefits, such as lower energy costs and reduced environmental harm, can far outweigh these costs [29]. Second, promoting energy efficiency is an essential aspect of achieving sustainable development. Reducing energy consumption through the implementation of energy-efficient technologies in industry, construction, and transport can reduce CO2 emissions while maintaining economic growth [6]. The results reveal a significant and positive relationship between population growth and CO2 emissions, confirming that higher population densities contribute to increased environmental impact. However, the magnitude of this effect varies across EU member states, with countries like Germany and Poland displaying distinct emission profiles.
The European Environment Agency [43] provides a comprehensive overview of progress towards climate and energy targets across the continent, emphasizing significant disparities in national achievements. The report highlights that while the EU as a whole made advancements in reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 30% compared to 1990 levels, some member states still face structural barriers to decarbonization, especially in sectors like transport and buildings [43]. The 2021 trends underline the importance of sustained investment in energy efficiency and renewable energy integration to meet the 2030 climate objectives. Furthermore, the role of governance and policy consistency is noted as a critical factor in achieving emission reduction across diverse economic contexts [43].
Q.Wang and M.Su [40] investigated the global drivers behind the decoupling of economic growth from carbon emissions, analyzing data from 186 countries. Their empirical analysis reveals that technological innovation, energy structure optimization, and improvements in energy intensity are key contributors to successful decoupling. Particularly in developed nations, structural changes in the economy—shifting from industry to services—have also played a significant role [40]. This study provides a strong quantitative basis for understanding how economies can maintain growth while reducing their environmental footprint, thereby supporting climate policy design.
A.Markandya and M.González-Eguino [26] delve into the complexities of financing climate adaptation, specifically addressing loss and damage in vulnerable regions. Their integrated assessment framework considers the multi-layered nature of climate risk, recommending a differentiated approach to financing that includes public funds, private investment, and insurance mechanisms. They emphasize the moral imperative for high-emitting countries to support adaptation in less developed nations, linking financial responsibility with historical emissions and adaptive capacity [26].
In a different yet related context, K.W. Knight et al. [42] explore the potential environmental benefits of reduced working hours in OECD countries. Using a cross-national panel dataset from 1970 to 2007, the authors find that shorter working weeks are associated with lower carbon emissions per capita, primarily due to reductions in energy-intensive consumption and transport [42]. This provocative finding challenges conventional growth paradigms and suggests that labor policy could be an underexplored avenue for climate mitigation. Similarly, V.Ahonen et al. (2024) contribute to this discussion by examining efforts of higher education institutions toward carbon neutrality, revealing significant implementation gaps despite high aspirations [22]. Their findings highlight the need for more rigorous monitoring frameworks and institutional support mechanisms to turn sustainability goals into measurable outcomes.
Additional important aspects include carbon taxes on CO2 emissions and funding for research in new technologies. European countries are actively using financial instruments to encourage the development of eco-friendly technologies, which helps reduce overall CO2 emissions without harming the economy [25,39,43,44,45].
Many EU countries have committed substantial investments in renewable energy and green technologies as part of their sustainable development strategies. Germany, Italy, and Spain are some of the largest investors, with a combined EUR 1 trillion in green investments expected over the next several decades (Table 2). This table provides valuable cross-country insights and observes that nations with high GDP per capita, such as Germany and France, have significantly reduced emissions through aggressive investment in renewable energy, whereas lower-income economies still struggle with decarbonization. This suggests that financial and technological support from the EU could accelerate emission reductions in lagging countries.
Table 2. Comparison of CO2 emissions and sustainable development policies in EU countries.
Table 2. Comparison of CO2 emissions and sustainable development policies in EU countries.
CountryFossil Fuel CO2 Emissions Sustainable Development PoliciesCarbon Pricing MechanismsTransition to Renewable EnergyKey ChallengesFinancial Data CO2 Emissions
AustriaLow to moderate, decreasingClimate neutrality by 2040, renewable energy targetEU ETS participation, carbon taxesHigh share of hydroelectric energy, increasing wind and solarEnergy storage and grid integration, balancing renewablesEUR 5 billion investment in green energy and infrastructure (2020–2030) (Austrian Government)
BelgiumModerate, with a focus on natural gasStrong focus on reducing emissions and renewable integrationParticipation in EU ETSModerate renewable energy growth, with solar and windManaging nuclear phase-out, energy security concernsEUR 4 billion in renewable energy subsidies (2020–2025) (Belgian Government)
Den-markLow, significant reduction in fossil fuelsLeading in clean energy transition, climate neutrality by 2050High carbon tax, participation in EU ETSStrong wind energy, offshore wind industryHigh energy costs, balancing wind variabilityDKK 100 billion (approx. EUR 13 billion) in renewable energy investments (2020–2030) (Danish Government)
Ger-manyHigh, but decreasing (due to coal phase-out)Strong commitment to the European Green Deal and energy transitionEmissions Trading System (ETS), carbon tax on vehiclesSignificant growth in wind and solar energyCoal phase-out, dependence on industrial sectors, energy pricesEUR 1 trillion investment required for energy transition (2020–2050) (German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy)
FranceModerate, low per capita emissionsEnergy transition, focus on nuclear and renewable energyParticipation in the EU ETS, carbon tax on fossil fuelsHigh nuclear energy share, increasing renewablesNuclear dependency, balance of renewables and nuclear energyEUR 1 trillion investment required for energy transition (2020–2050) (German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy)
FinlandLow to moderate, decreasing fossil fuel useCarbon neutrality target by 2035, circular economy modelCarbon tax, EU ETS participationFocus on wind energy, bioenergy, and nuclearEnergy security, transition from nuclear and biomassEUR 10 billion investments in renewable energy (2021–2030) (Finnish Government)
ItalyModerate, with significant reliance on natural gasFocus on renewable energy integration and energy efficiencyEU ETS participation, carbon tax initiativesGrowth in solar and wind, but still reliant on gasBalancing energy security with transition to renewablesEUR 70 billion investment in energy transition (2030–2050) (Italian Ministry of Ecological Transition)
PolandVery high, reliance on coalSlow progress in energy transition, but increasing EU pressureParticipation in EU ETS, coal sector subsidiesGrowing interest in wind and solar, but coal remains dominantCoal dependence, social resistance to change, energy securityEUR 60 billion in EU funds for energy transition (2021–2027) (Polish Government)
SpainModerate to high, but decliningStrong commitment to decarbonization and renewable energy targetsParticipation in EU ETSLeading in solar power, growth in wind energyEnergy storage, grid infrastructure developmentEUR 22 billion investments in renewables (2020–2025) (Spanish Government)
SwedenLow, strong environmental performanceAmbitious climate goals, carbon neutrality by 2045Carbon tax, participation in EU ETSStrong reliance on hydroelectric and wind energyAchieving carbon neutrality in industrial sectorsEUR 45 billion (SEK 500 billion) green investments by 2030 (Swedish Government)
Nether-landsHigh, but decliningStrong push towards sustainability, green growth agendaParticipation in EU ETS, carbon taxSignificant investments in wind energy and solarInfrastructure investment for renewables integrationEUR 13 billion investments in offshore wind by 2030 (Dutch Government)
United King-domDecreasing, strong decline in coal usageStrong policies under the Climate Change Act, net-zero target by 2050Carbon pricing through Carbon Price Floor (CPF)Rapid growth in wind energy, offshore wind leadershipManaging regional economic impacts, energy security risksGBP 30 billion (approx. EUR 35 billion) investment in green technologies (UK Government, 2020)
Source: author’s work based on [2,7,8,9,11,16,17,18,23,28,33,38,40,46,47,48,49,50].
Countries like Denmark, Sweden, and Spain are heavily investing in renewable energy infrastructure, particularly wind and solar, to meet their carbon neutrality targets. The financial data summarized in a Table 2, indicate that the transition to cleaner energy is a significant financial undertaking. Challenges such as balancing energy security with renewable integration, coal dependence (e.g., Poland), and nuclear phase-out (e.g., Belgium) continue to require substantial financial and policy interventions [1,41,51,52].
Carbon emissions from fossil fuels have been closely linked to population growth, as increased population generally leads to higher energy demand, industrial production, and transportation needs, all of which rely heavily on fossil fuels. As the global population expands, particularly in developing nations, the demand for energy grows, often outpacing the adoption of cleaner energy technologies. This results in higher emissions of carbon dioxide, contributing to climate change and environmental degradation. Industrialization, urbanization, and increased consumption are major drivers of this trend [26,34,51,52,53].
However, sustainable development offers a viable path to mitigate this ecological problem. By emphasizing the transition to renewable energy sources, improving energy efficiency, and adopting green technologies, it is possible to decouple economic growth from environmental degradation. Policies that promote sustainable practices, such as the widespread use of solar, wind, and hydropower, as well as the implementation of carbon pricing and stricter environmental regulations, can significantly reduce CO2 emissions. Additionally, fostering sustainable urban planning, efficient transportation systems, and circular economies can help curb emissions despite population growth. Ultimately, through a global commitment to sustainable development, it is possible to stabilize emissions, ensuring a healthier planet for future generations while accommodating population growth.
The analysis of the CO2 emissions from energy use in the European Union demonstrates carbon intensity among the countries, reflecting different approaches to economic development and climate action. The state of carbon dioxide emissions in EU countries in 2022 is represented in Figure 3. These data highlight variations in national emission trends. Bulgaria and Portugal experienced emission increases due to delayed transitions to renewable energy and heavy reliance on fossil fuels in industrial sectors. By contrast, countries like Denmark and Sweden have successfully implemented green policies, resulting in lower emissions.
The figures and tables illustrate the impact of GDP per capita and energy policy variations. For example, Germany’s transition towards renewable energy has mitigated its emissions, whereas Poland’s reliance on coal continues to drive higher CO2 output. Furthermore, scenario analyses highlight how different policy interventions can alter emission trajectories. The Aggressive Emission Reduction scenario projects a 35% reduction in CO2 by 2040, suggesting that stronger regulatory measures can substantially curb environmental impact. These findings have critical policy implications. The results emphasize the need for more stringent carbon pricing mechanisms, particularly in high-emission economies like Poland. Additionally, targeted investments in renewable energy could accelerate emission reductions in countries with slower transitions. That is why this study underscores the importance of country-specific policy frameworks, reinforcing that a one-size-fits-all approach may not be effective in reducing CO2 emissions across the EU.
According to official statistics, CO2 emissions in 2022 significantly decreased in EU countries: in the Netherlands by 12.8%, in Luxembourg by 12%, in Belgium—9.7%, and in Hungary—8.6%. However, some countries increased their CO2 emissions, for example, Bulgaria by 12% and, similarly, Portugal by 9.9% and Malta by 4.1%. Germany also remains a significant polluter, since a quarter of total CO2 emissions in the EU from burning fossil fuels for energy use are carried out here. Italy and Poland are slightly lagging behind in this negative trend, each accounting for 12.4% of total emissions. France had 10.7% of total CO2 emissions in the EU in 2022 [41,43].
In Europe, in 2023, GHG emissions in the EU-27 were 33.9% lower than in 1990, reaching 3.22 Gt CO2eq. Compared to 2022, emissions in the EU-27 decreased by 7.5% (−261 Mt CO2eq), and the EU-27 share of global emissions decreased from 6.8% in 2022 to 6.1% in 2023 (Figure 4). Emissions from international aviation and shipping, which account for 0.9% and 1.4% of global GHG emissions, increased by 19.5% and 1.1% in 2023.
The data from this Figure 4 confirm earlier studies suggesting that economic growth and urbanization amplify emissions but also reveal that stringent EU environmental policies mitigate these effects in certain member states. Policy implications emerging from these findings indicate that EU countries must adopt more targeted strategies to balance population growth with sustainable development. For instance, enhancing carbon pricing mechanisms in high-emission countries like Poland while expanding renewable energy incentives in regions with lower adoption rates (e.g., Bulgaria and Portugal) could optimize CO2 reduction efforts. Moreover, countries with aging populations, such as Germany and Italy, must develop sustainable infrastructure that supports energy efficiency without hindering economic growth. One major limitation is the reliance on reported CO2 data, which may vary in accuracy due to differences in national reporting standards.
Germany stands as one of the leading examples of energy transition in Europe, known as the “Energiewende”. This national policy framework emphasizes a shift from fossil fuels and nuclear energy to renewable sources while significantly enhancing energy efficiency across sectors. In the context of office buildings, Germany has implemented stringent energy performance standards and incentivized deep energy retrofits. As a result, German office buildings have progressively reduced their energy demand, achieving compliance with both national and EU-level sustainability targets [23].
According to Eurostat and the German Federal Environment Agency, the country has achieved a notable reduction in CO2 emissions in the building sector over the last decade. This success is largely due to improved thermal insulation, adoption of smart energy management systems, and the increasing use of renewable heating technologies such as biomass boilers and heat pumps. These efforts serve as a benchmark for countries such as Ukraine, highlighting effective practices in climate mitigation policy implementation in the built environment. Germany’s data also demonstrate the long-term benefits of consistent investment in building modernization, underscoring the importance of political will and regulatory stability [23].
As Figure 5 shows, a whopping 750 million metric tons of carbon dioxide were emitted into the air in 2022 from transportation. Electricity and heat generation in the utilities sector came in second place with a total of 730 Mt CO2. Together, these two sectors accounted for more than 50% of total net CO2 emissions. This underscores the need for enhanced investments in electric mobility, grid decarbonization, and public transportation systems. By focusing policy efforts on these high-emission sectors, the EU can achieve more efficient and equitable CO2 reduction.
The power industry is the largest contributor, accounting for 38.1% of total emissions, followed by transportation at 20.7% and industrial combustion at 17%. Other significant sources include buildings (8.9%), industrial processes (8.4%), and fuel exploitation (6.6%). Agriculture, with only 0.4%, has the smallest share [2,8,39,40,41]. These figures highlight the major role of energy production and transportation in emissions, suggesting that policies targeting these sectors could have the greatest impact on reducing overall emissions.

4. Discussion

Several European Union (EU) countries have made significant strides in addressing the issue of carbon emissions from fossil fuels while managing the challenges of population growth. These countries are implementing a variety of policies and investing heavily in sustainable development practices to reduce their carbon footprints while also addressing the impacts of growing populations on emissions.
Germany acknowledges that as its population grows, energy demand will inevitably increase, leading to higher emissions if fossil fuels remain dominant. However, through its Energiewende (energy transition), Germany aims to decouple economic growth and energy consumption from CO2 emissions [1,9,32,46]. The country is investing heavily in renewable energy technologies, particularly wind and solar, as well as energy storage and grid modernization to handle the variable nature of renewables. Smart grids and energy efficiency technologies in buildings and industry are also central to the strategy. By 2030, Germany aims to have 65% of its energy from renewable sources, significantly reducing emissions despite population growth [1,8]. Furthermore, the implementation of carbon pricing mechanisms, such as the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS), incentivizes industries to reduce their carbon footprints. Germany’s approach combines technological innovation, policy incentives, and public awareness to manage emissions growth in parallel with a growing population [38,41].
France’s approach to managing emissions in the face of population growth involves a strong reliance on nuclear energy and renewables. Nuclear power provides a significant share of the country’s low-carbon energy, while wind, solar, and hydropower also contribute to reducing fossil fuel dependency. The French government has implemented carbon taxes on fossil fuels, which not only help reduce emissions but also provide financial resources for further investments in clean technologies. France evaluates the impact of increasing population size on emissions through comprehensive carbon footprint assessments, which highlight sectors such as transportation and residential energy consumption as key contributors. As part of its efforts to meet EU climate goals, France has committed to electrifying transportation, supporting electric vehicle infrastructure, and energy-efficient building standards. These efforts are essential for mitigating emissions as the population grows [4,6,28,41,43].
The United Kingdom has made significant progress in reducing carbon emissions despite a growing population, particularly through the decarbonization of the power sector. The UK has seen a dramatic reduction in coal use, shifting toward offshore wind, solar, and nuclear power [32,44,56,57]. The UK government has implemented policies to phase out gasoline and diesel cars, with a ban on new sales set for 2030. Moreover, the UK’s Carbon Price Floor (CPF) has provided a financial incentive to phase out fossil fuels in the energy sector [8]. The UK government acknowledges that population growth increases energy demand, but it aims to offset this through technological advancements, such as smart meters and energy storage systems that increase the efficiency of energy use. As part of the UK’s long-term strategy to reach net-zero emissions by 2050, it is also heavily investing in hydrogen technology and carbon capture and storage (CCS) to reduce industrial emissions.
Poland faces significant challenges in managing rising CO2 emissions with its growing population, given the country’s reliance on coal for energy [1,53]. The government has acknowledged that population growth exacerbates emissions from industrial sectors, residential heating, and transportation, which rely heavily on coal and other fossil fuels. To address this, Poland is beginning to shift toward renewable energy, focusing on wind and solar power, and has set ambitious goals to increase the share of renewables in its energy mix. However, coal remains a dominant energy source, and substantial financial support is required for a successful transition [47,52]. Poland’s participation in the EU Emissions Trading System provides some flexibility in emission reduction, but the country has also introduced energy efficiency measures and carbon pricing initiatives [15,41,51]. To counteract rising emissions, Poland is working on energy diversification and integrating green technologies such as biomass and district heating systems.
Denmark has long recognized the impact of population growth on emissions, especially in urban areas. The country has been at the forefront of renewable energy adoption, primarily focusing on wind power, both onshore and offshore, which now represents a significant portion of its electricity generation. The Danish government has committed to carbon neutrality by 2050, aiming to offset the impacts of population growth through sustainable urban planning, green transportation, and increased energy efficiency [50,58]. Denmark’s smart grids and energy storage solutions help ensure that energy consumption from renewables is maximized, reducing the need for fossil fuels even as the population expands. Additionally, electric vehicles (EVs) are being widely promoted, with incentives for their use and the establishment of EV infrastructure. Sustainable agriculture and circular economy initiatives are also part of Denmark’s strategy to address emissions from land use and waste management as the population grows.
Sweden has committed to being carbon neutral by 2045, recognizing that population growth puts pressure on energy systems, transportation, and housing, all of which are major sources of CO2 emissions [8,13,17]. The country focuses heavily on renewable energy, especially hydroelectric power, wind energy, and bioenergy. Sweden’s policy includes carbon taxes, which incentivize both individuals and industries to reduce their carbon footprints. District heating systems, which provide efficient thermal energy to multiple households, and high-efficiency buildings have been widely implemented. Sweden’s transport sector is transitioning to electric vehicles, and the country is also heavily investing in carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies [39,52]. Sweden’s combination of taxes, technology, and renewable investments enables it to manage both the challenges of growing emissions and a rising population.
Spain faces a similar challenge in managing emissions growth, particularly in sectors like transportation and residential energy consumption. However, Spain has committed to expanding its renewable energy capacity, with solar and wind power leading the way. The government has made significant investments in solar power infrastructure and offshore wind, which are expected to play a key role in reducing emissions, despite population increases [1,24]. Additionally, Spain has set ambitious goals for energy efficiency in the residential and industrial sectors, with a focus on low-carbon technologies and smart buildings. Policies to promote electric mobility and green public transport are central to reducing emissions from the transportation sector. Spain also integrates energy storage systems to accommodate renewable energy sources, which will help meet the demands of a growing population without increasing emissions.
These countries are increasingly aware that population growth will lead to higher energy demand and emissions unless proactive measures are taken. Through investments in renewable energy, energy efficiency technologies, and green transportation, they are developing innovative solutions that balance the demands of growing populations with the need for sustainability. Moreover, carbon pricing and the adoption of smart technologies allow for the decoupling of emissions from economic growth, demonstrating that sustainable development is achievable even in the context of rising population numbers.
The following section will present a number of key perspectives on reducing the negative impact of CO2 from fossil fuels, together with the references to the authors’ sources (see Table 3). This table outlines various instruments and perspectives aimed at reducing the negative impact of CO2 emissions from fossil fuels. It includes renewable energy sources like wind, solar, hydropower, and geothermal, which replace fossil fuels with cleaner alternatives. Energy efficiency measures such as smart grids and green building standards help optimize energy use and reduce waste.
Carbon capture and storage technologies, along with sustainable transportation solutions like electric vehicles and expanded public transit, contribute to lowering emissions in industrial and transport sectors. Policy frameworks, such as carbon pricing and subsidies for green technologies, alongside nature-based solutions like reforestation, play key roles in mitigating emissions and promoting environmental sustainability.
The following are just a few of the key perspectives held by scientists regarding the reduction in CO2 emissions and the implementation of the Green Deal. This topic is complex and multifaceted, requiring a comprehensive approach to effectively tackle the issue.

5. Conclusions

The following conclusions were formed as a result of the conducted research.
  • This study underscores the need for EU countries to enhance carbon pricing mechanisms, increase renewable energy investments, and tailor policies to national economic structures. Specifically, high-emission countries should prioritize stronger emission reduction strategies, while low-emission nations should focus on sustaining their progress through continued policy support. The findings of this study emphasize the intricate interplay between population dynamics and fossil CO2 emissions, underscoring the necessity for multifaceted approaches to address climate change and promote sustainable development. By comprehending the drivers and ramifications of the mounting reliance on fossil fuels, policymakers can devise targeted interventions aimed at decoupling economic growth from carbon emissions and catalyzing a transition towards renewable energy sources. For Europe, there are several prospects in terms of reducing the negative impact of CO2 emissions: these include an increase in renewable energy usage, the stimulation of energy efficiency, the implementation of carbon targets, a transition to transport models, and the promotion of a circular economy. The authors highlight the significant role of economic growth and urbanization in driving emissions while demonstrating the effectiveness of EU environmental policies in mitigating these effects.
  • The economic analysis of CO2 emissions from fossil energy sources is an important tool for developing effective policies that promote sustainable development. The European Union is actively working to reduce emissions through various economic and political mechanisms, focusing on innovation, renewable energy sources, and energy efficiency. At the same time, it is essential to ensure a fair transition to sustainable development, which will require integrating economic, environmental, and social aspects into decarbonization processes. These findings contribute to global climate change mitigation efforts by emphasizing the importance of regional policy differentiation and cooperation. As the EU strives to meet its sustainability targets, our study reinforces the urgency of integrating climate action into economic and demographic planning.
  • Many EU countries have committed substantial investments in renewable energy and green technologies as part of their sustainable development strategies. Germany, Italy, and Spain are some of the largest investors, with a combined EUR 1 trillion in green investments expected over the next several decades. Countries like Denmark, Sweden, and Spain are heavily investing in renewable energy infrastructure, particularly wind and solar, to meet their carbon neutrality targets. The financial data summarized in this study indicate that the transition to cleaner energy is a significant financial undertaking. Challenges such as balancing energy security with renewable integration, coal dependence (e.g., Poland), and nuclear phase-out (e.g., Belgium) continue to require substantial financial and policy interventions.
  • Demographic factors play a major role in carbon emissions, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to address the environmental impacts of population expansion. To combat climate change, strategies should not only focus on technological advancements and policies but also incorporate population dynamics, ensuring more effective mitigation of emissions. Addressing the link between population growth, economic development, and environmental sustainability requires integrated approaches. Policies should prioritize investments in renewable energy, energy efficiency, and sustainable urban planning while also promoting access to education, healthcare, and family planning services to manage population growth responsibly. Additionally, understanding the economic and health impacts of CO2 emissions is crucial for planning preventive measures at all levels, from international to local. Finally, due to the global nature of climate change, addressing the relationship between population growth and CO2 emissions requires international collaboration. Effective mitigation strategies and a transition to a low-carbon economy can be supported by sharing best practices, transferring technology, and mobilizing financial resources across borders.
  • In the next publication, the authors plan to develop a correlation regression model to assess the impact of population on fossil CO2 emissions, which will highlight the importance of data-based analysis for effective policymaking. The correlation coefficient will be found, indicating the relationship between population growth and increased emissions, and the variables and vectors will be tested for multicollinearity. The model will include data from 1940, i.e., for the last 85 years, which will confirm the adequacy of the study. Future studies should focus on exploring the influence of socio-economic factors, technological innovations, and policy frameworks in shaping emission patterns across various regions and timeframes. By considering aspects of sustainable development, such as renewable energy adoption, energy efficiency, and inclusive growth, these studies can offer evidence-based recommendations for designing policies that align environmental goals with economic and social development. This approach will ensure that climate action is informed by a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing emissions, supporting more effective and sustainable mitigation strategies.
  • Foresight is defined as the systematic exploration of possible future scenarios to inform decision-making and policy development. In the context of CO2 emissions and climate change, foresight can play a crucial role in identifying emerging trends, assessing future risks and opportunities, and designing proactive strategies to mitigate CO2 emissions and adapt to climate impacts. The employment of foresight methodologies, such as scenario analysis, trend analysis, and stakeholder engagement, enables policymakers, businesses, and civil society organizations to anticipate potential trajectories of CO2 emissions, explore alternative pathways for sustainable development, and identify innovative solutions to address climate challenges. The integration of foresight into decision-making processes related to CO2 emissions has the potential to enhance resilience, stimulate innovation, and facilitate the transition to a low-carbon and climate-resilient future. Policymakers must act swiftly to align population growth with emission reduction goals. Investing in clean technologies, enforcing stricter regulations, and promoting sustainable urban development will be essential in achieving long-term environmental sustainability.
Further research should also explore the role of technological innovation in mitigating emissions and examine the impact of sector-specific policies on different economic structures within the EU. Future research could improve upon this by incorporating non-linear models and alternative datasets, such as satellite-based emissions tracking.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.Y. and M.A.R.; methodology, A.Y.; validation A.Y.; formal analysis, A.Y.; resources, M.A.R. and A.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, A.Y.; review M.A.R. and A.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. The Statistics Portal for Market Data. Available online: https://www.statista.com (accessed on 31 March 2025).
  2. The World Bank in Poland. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org (accessed on 9 September 2024).
  3. Global Debt Report 2024: Bond Markets in a High-Debt Environment; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2024. [CrossRef]
  4. Tenga, X.; Lub, L.C.; Chiu, Y.-H. How the European Union reaches the target of CO2 emissions under the Paris Agreement. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2020, 28, 1836–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gambhir, A.; Mittal, S.; Lamboll, R.D.; Grant, N.; Bernie, D.; Gohar, L.; Hawkes, A.; Köberle, A.; Rogelj, J.; Lowe, J.A. Adjusting 1.5 degree C climate change mitigation pathways in light of adverse new information. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. What Are the Sustainable Development Goals? 2024. Available online: https://www.sightsavers.org/policy-and-advocacy/global-goals/?gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiAy9msBhD0ARIsANbk0A8x3Z2OnYDAmW8AnYh0x_J1zig90-bAHcaScOs_SQ2D5UOCrks7GksaApPaEALw_wcB (accessed on 13 March 2025).
  7. Yakymchuk, A. The Carbon Dioxide Emissions’ World Footprint: Diagnosis of Perspectives. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology—Organization and Management Series. 2024. Issue No. 195. Available online: https://managementpapers.polsl.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/195-Yakymchuk.pdf (accessed on 13 March 2025).
  8. CO2 Emissions from EU Territorial Energy Use: −2.8%. 2023. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20230609-2 (accessed on 16 March 2025).
  9. Hepburn, C.; Adlen, E.; Beddington, J.; Carter, E.A.; Fuss, S.; Mac Dowell, N.; Minx, J.C.; Smith, P.; Williams, C.K. The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal. Nature 2019, 575, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, M.; Yang, Z.; Liu, L.; Zhou, D. Impact of renewable energy investment on carbon emissions in China—An empirical study using a nonparametric additive regression model. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 785, 147109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Distribution of Carbon Dioxide Emissions Worldwide in 2022, by Sector. 2024. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1129656/global-share-of-co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuel-and-cement (accessed on 5 March 2025).
  12. Average Monthly Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Levels in the Atmosphere Worldwide from 1990 to 2024. 2024. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1091999/atmospheric-concentration-of-co2-historic (accessed on 16 March 2025).
  13. Le Quéré, C.; Jackson, R.B.; Jones, M.W.; Smith, A.J.P.; Abernethy, S.; Andrew, R.M.; De-Gol, A.J.; Willis, D.R.; Shan, Y.; Canadell, J.G.; et al. Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement. Nat. Clim. Change 2020, 10, 647–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Baumol, W.J.; Oates, W.E. The Theory of Environmental Policy; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1988; pp. 112–115. [Google Scholar]
  15. Daly, H.E. Steady-State Economics: The Economics of Biophysical Equilibrium and Moral Growth; Freeman: Dallas, TX, USA, 1977; pp. 67–70. [Google Scholar]
  16. Brundtland, G.H. Our Common Future; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1987; pp. 43–45. [Google Scholar]
  17. European Commission. The European Green Deal; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019; pp. 3–5. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hasselmann, K. Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 43–46. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ellerman, A.D.; Marcantonini, C. The EU Emissions Trading System and Its Post-2020 Expansion; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2016; pp. 89–91. [Google Scholar]
  20. How Has World Population Growth Changed Over Time? Our World in Data. 2025. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/population-growth-over-time (accessed on 5 April 2025).
  21. Official Site of the European Statistics Service 2024. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat (accessed on 16 March 2025).
  22. Ahonen, V.L.; Woszczek, A.; Baumeister, S.; Helimo, U.T.; Jackson, A.K.; Kopsakangas-Savolainen, M.; Kääriä, J.; Lehtonen, T.; Luoranen, M.; Pongrácz, E.; et al. Carbon neutral higher education institutions: A reality check, challenges and solutions. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2024, 25, 293–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kropp, T.; Lennerts, K.; Fisch, M.N.; Kley, C.; Wilken, T.; Marx, S.; Zak, J. The contribution of the German building sector to achieve the 1.5 °C target. Carbon Manag. 2022, 13, 511–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sovacool, B.K. The Politics of Renewable Energy Transitions; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2021; pp. 112–114. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yakymchuk, A.; Maxand, S.; Lewandowska, A. Economic Analysis of Global CO2 Emissions and Energy Consumption Based on the World Kaya Identity. Energies 2025, 18, 1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Markandya, A.; González-Eguino, M. Integrated Assessment for Identifying Climate Finance Needs for Loss and Damage: A Critical Review. In Loss and Damage from Climate Change. Climate Risk Management; Mechler, R., Bouwer, L., Schinko, T., Surminski, S., Linnerooth-Bayer, J., Eds.; Policy and Governance; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schneider, M. Energy Transition and Sustainability; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 56–59. [Google Scholar]
  28. Fouquet, R. Consumer Surplus from Energy Transitions. Energy J. 2023, 39, 167–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhou, D. Renewable Energy Technologies: Sustainability and Environmental Impacts; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 113–115. [Google Scholar]
  30. Davis, S.J.; Caldeira, K.; Matthews, H.D. Implications of Existing Energy Infrastructure for Future CO2 Emissions Trajectories. Environ. Res. Lett. 2010, 5, 300–320. [Google Scholar]
  31. Creutzig, F.; Jochem, P.; Edelenbosch, O.Y.; Mattauch, L.; Vuuren, D.P.; McCollum, D.; Minx, J. Transport: A roadblock to climate change mitigation? Science 2015, 350, 911–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Griffiths, I.; Wang, R.; Ling-Chin, J.; Roskilly, A.P. Solid oxide fuel cells with integrated direct air carbon capture: A techno-economic study. Energy Convers. Manag. 2024, 315, 118739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Edenhofer, O.; Lessmann, K.; Kemfert, C.; Grubb, M.; Koehler, J. Induced Techno logical Change: Exploring its Implications for the Economics of Atmospheric Stabilization: Synthesis Report from the Innovation Modeling Comparison Project. Energy J. 2006, 27, 57–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development. 2015. Available online: https://www.ticketforchange.org/become-a-changemaker-mooc (accessed on 16 March 2025).
  35. Fischer, C.; Newell, R. Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2008, 55, 142–162. Available online: https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jeeman/v55y2008i2p142-162.html (accessed on 16 March 2025). [CrossRef]
  36. Smith, A.; Johnson, B. Renewable Energy Policies and Job Creation: The Case of Poland. Renew. Energy 2020, 112, 14–22. [Google Scholar]
  37. Carbon Dioxide Emissions of the Most Polluting Countries Worldwide in 2010 and 2022. 2024. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/270499/co2-emissions-in-selected-countries/ (accessed on 16 March 2025).
  38. CO2 Emissions per Capita vs. Population Growth. 2022. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/co2-emissions-vs-gdp (accessed on 16 March 2025).
  39. Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions in the European Union in 2022, by Key Source. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1462166/main-co2-emissions-sources-european-union-eu (accessed on 16 March 2025).
  40. Wang, Q.; Su, M. Drivers of decoupling economic growth from carbon emission—An empirical analysis of 192 countries using decoupling model and decomposition method. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2020, 81, 106356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Crippa, M.; Guizzardi, D.; Pagani, F.; Banja, M.; Muntean, M.; Schaaf, E.; Monforti-Ferrario, F.; Becker, W.E.; Quadrelli, R.; Risquez Martin, A.; et al. GHG Emissions of All World Countries; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2023; Available online: https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/booklet/GHG_emissions_of_all_world_countries_booklet_2023report.pdf (accessed on 16 March 2025).
  42. Knight, K.W.; Rosa, E.A.; Schor, J.B. Could working less reduce pressures on the environment? A cross-national panel analysis of OECD countries, 1970–2007. Glob. Environ. Change 2013, 23, 691–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. European Environment Agency. Trends and Projections in Europe 2021: Tracking Progress Towards Europe’s Climate and Energy Targets; European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2021; 41p, ISBN 978-92-9480-392-4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Grubb, M.; Gupta, J. Climate Change and European Leadership. A Sustainable Role for Europe? Springer Nature: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000; Available online: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-94-017-1049-7 (accessed on 16 March 2025).
  45. Parry, I.W.H. Fiscal Policies for Sustainable Development; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2018; pp. 78–80. [Google Scholar]
  46. Jędrzejowska, K.; Wróbel, A. Gospodarka Światowa 2022–2023: Czas Niepewności, Niepokoju i Postępującej Fragmentacji. Rocznik Strategiczny 2022. 2022. Available online: https://wnpism.uw.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/08_Gospodarka_KJedrzejowska_AWrobel.pdf (accessed on 16 March 2025).
  47. Jiang, Y.; Ren, Z.; Lu, C.; Li, H.; Yang, Z. A region-based low-carbon operation analysis method for integrated electricity-hydrogen-gas systems. Appl. Energy 2024, 355, 122230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hamilton, L. Education, Politics and Opinions About Climate Change Evidence for Interaction Effects. Clim. Change 2010, 104, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Creutzig, F.; Agoston, P.; Goldschmidt, J.C.; Luderer, G.; Nemet, G.; Pietzcker, R.C. The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 17140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Böhringer, C.; Löschel, A. Promoting Renewable Energy in Europe: A Hybrid Computable General Equilibrium Approach. Energy J. 2006, 27 (Suppl. S2), 135–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. IEA. World Energy Outlook; International Energy Agency (IEA): Paris, France, 2024; Volume 3, pp. 50–75. [Google Scholar]
  52. Statistics Poland GUS. Available online: https://sdg.gov.pl (accessed on 16 March 2025).
  53. IPCC Sixth Assessment Report. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Geneva, Switzerland, 2021; Volume 1, pp. 200–250.
  54. Wright, R.M.; Quéré, C.L.; Mayot, N.; Olsen, A.; Bakker, D. Fingerprint of climate change on Southern Ocean carbon storage. ESS Open Arch. 2022. Available online: https://essopenarchive.org/doi/full/10.1002/essoar.10512597.1 (accessed on 5 March 2025).
  55. van Vuuren, D.P.; Riahi, K.; Calvin, K.V.; Dellink, R.B.; Emmerling, J.; Fujimori, S.; Kc, S.; Kriegler, E.; O’Neill, B. The Shared Socio-economic Pathways: Trajectories for human development and global environmental change. Glob. Environ. Change 2017, 42, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Gross National Income (GNI) Indicator; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): Paris, France, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Golub, A. Analysis of Climate Policies with GDyn-E. GTAP Technical Paper. 2013. Available online: https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/res_display.asp?RecordID=4292 (accessed on 16 March 2025).
  58. Annual Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Worldwide from 1940 to 2023. 2024. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/276629/global-co2-emissions/ (accessed on 16 March 2025).
Figure 3. CO2 emissions from energy use in 2022 in European Union. * Average data for the entire European Union. Source: based on data from [1,2,8,17,25,26,31,39,41,50,54].
Figure 3. CO2 emissions from energy use in 2022 in European Union. * Average data for the entire European Union. Source: based on data from [1,2,8,17,25,26,31,39,41,50,54].
Energies 18 02106 g003
Figure 4. Percentage of CO2 emissions in 2023, Gt CO2eq. Source: based on data from [1,8,22,52,53].
Figure 4. Percentage of CO2 emissions in 2023, Gt CO2eq. Source: based on data from [1,8,22,52,53].
Energies 18 02106 g004
Figure 5. Carbon dioxide emissions in the EU in 2022 (by key source). Source: based on the data from [2,12,20,39,41,43,46,55]. * Others high-emission sectors in the EU.
Figure 5. Carbon dioxide emissions in the EU in 2022 (by key source). Source: based on the data from [2,12,20,39,41,43,46,55]. * Others high-emission sectors in the EU.
Energies 18 02106 g005
Table 3. Instruments and perspectives on reducing the negative impact of CO2 emissions from fossil fuels.
Table 3. Instruments and perspectives on reducing the negative impact of CO2 emissions from fossil fuels.
CategoryInstrumentDescriptionImpactSource
Renewable EnergyWind and Solar PowerReplacing fossil fuels with sustainable energy sourcesReduces emissions, increases sustainabilityEuropean Green Deal (2019) [17]; Wang Q., et al. (2016) [40]; Tenga, X., et al. (2020) [4]; A. Golub, et al. (2013) [57]; Brundtland, G.H. (1987) [16]; Creutzig, et al. (2015) [31].
Hydropower and GeothermalUtilizing natural energy sources for electricity generationLowers carbon footprintMarkandya, A., et al. (2019) [26]; Wang Q., et al. (2016) [40]; Yakymchuk A. (2024) [7]; Van Vuuren, D. P., et al. (2017) [55]; Yakymchuk A., et al. (2025) [25].
Energy EfficiencySmart Grid TechnologyOptimizing energy distribution to minimize wasteImproves energy efficiencyC. Hamilton (2011) [48]; Wang Q., et al. (2016) [40]; Yakymchuk A. (2024) [7]; C.Böhringer, et al. (2006) [50]; Global Debt Report (2024) [3]; Kropp T., et al. (2022) [23].
Green Building StandardsEnergy-efficient materials and technology in constructionReduces energy consumptionJędrzejowska, K., & Wróbel, A. (2022) [46]; Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development (2015) [34]; Wang, Q., & Su, M. (2020) [40]; European Green Deal (2019) [17]; Ahonen, V., et al. (2024) [22].
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)Direct Air CaptureRemoving CO2 from the atmosphereReduces greenhouse gasesWang Q., et al. (2016) [40]; Yakymchuk A. (2024) [7]; C. Böhringer, et al. (2006) [50]; Xiangyu Tenga, et al., (2020) [4]; Markandya, A., & González-Eguino, M. (2019) [26].
Carbon SequestrationStoring CO2 underground or using it in industryPrevents emissions from entering the airWang Q., et al. (2016) [40]; Yakymchuk A. (2024) [7]; Xiangyu Tenga et al. (2020) [4]; Gambhir, A., et al., (2023) [5]; Qingyun Zhao, et al., (2024) [4]; Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2020) [36].
Sustainable TransportationElectric Vehicles (EVs)Replacing internal combustion engines with electric motorsLowers transportation-related CO2 emissionsKropp T. (2022) [23]; European Green Deal (2019) [17]; Wang Q., et al. (2016) [40]; C. Böhringer, et al. (2006) [50]; Knight, K.W.; et al. (2013) [42]; Hamilton, L. (2010) [48].
Public Transit ExpansionIncreasing public transport options to reduce car dependencyReduces traffic-related emissionsGriffiths, I., et al. (2024) [32]; Wang Q., et al. (2016) [40]; Yakymchuk A. (2024) [7]; C. Böhringer, et al. (2006) [50]; Distribution of Carbon Dioxide Emissions Worldwide in 2022 (2024) [11]; Davis, S.J., et al. (2010) [30]; Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2020) [36].
Policy and RegulationCarbon Pricing (Tax, Cap-and-Trade)Financial incentives to reduce CO2 emissionsEncourages businesses to cut emissionsEdenhofer, O., et al. (2006) [33]; Wang Q., et al., (2016) [40]; Yakymchuk A. (2024) [7]; Kropp, T., et al. (2022) [23].
Green Technology SubsidiesGovernment support for renewable energy and innovationsAccelerates transition to clean energySchneider, M. (2018) [27]; Baumol, W.J., & Oates, W.E. (1988) [14]; Daly, H.E. (1977) [15]; Brundtland, G.H. (1987) [16], Ellerman, A.D., & Marcantonini, C. (2016) [19]; European Commission (2023) [41]; Hasselmann, K. (2007) [18]; Zhou, D. (2020) [29]; Parry, I.W.H. (2018) [45].
Industrial DecarbonizationHydrogen Fuel DevelopmentUsing green hydrogen as a clean energy alternativeDecreases reliance on fossil fuelsSmith, A., & Johnson, B. (2020) [36]; Fouquet, R. (2023) [28]; Le Quéré, C., et al. (2020) [13]; Daly, H.E. (1977) [15]; Ellerman, A.D., & Marcantonini, C. (2016) [19]; European Commission (2023) [41]; Hasselmann, K. (2007) [18]; Parry, I.W.H. (2018) [45]; Sovacool, B.K. (2021) [24]; How Has World Population Growth Changed (2025) [20].
Circular Economy PracticesRecycling and waste reduction in productionReduces resource depletionDaly, H.E. (1977) [15]; Brundtland, G.H. (1987) [16], Ellerman, A.D., & Marcantonini, C. (2016) [19]; European Commission (2023) [41]; Hasselmann K., (2007) [18]; Zhou, D. (2020) [45]; Sovacool, B.K. (2021) [24]; Yakymchuk, A., et al. (2025) [25].
Nature-Based SolutionsReforestation and AfforestationPlanting trees to absorb CO2Increases carbon captureParry, I.W.H. (2018) [45]; Sovacool, B.K. (2021) [24]. Brundtland, G.H. (1987) [16], Ellerman, A.D., & Marcantonini, C. (2016) [19]; European Commission, (2023) [41]; Hasselmann, K. (2007) [18]; Zhou, D. (2020) [45]; Stern, N. (2024) [6].
Blue Carbon EcosystemsProtecting coastal and marine habitats that store carbonEnhances natural carbon sinksCreutzig F., et al. (2015) [31]; Wang Q., et al. (2016) [40]; Yakymchuk A. (2024) [7]; Stern, N. (2024) [6]; Fischer, C, & Newell, R. (2008) [35]; Jiang, Y., et al. (2024) [47]; Smith, A., & Johnson (2020) [36]; Kropp T., et al. (2022) [23].
Source: compiled by the authors.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yakymchuk, A.; Rataj, M.A. Economic Analysis of Fossil CO2 Emissions: A European Perspective on Sustainable Development. Energies 2025, 18, 2106. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18082106

AMA Style

Yakymchuk A, Rataj MA. Economic Analysis of Fossil CO2 Emissions: A European Perspective on Sustainable Development. Energies. 2025; 18(8):2106. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18082106

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yakymchuk, Alina, and Małgorzata Agnieszka Rataj. 2025. "Economic Analysis of Fossil CO2 Emissions: A European Perspective on Sustainable Development" Energies 18, no. 8: 2106. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18082106

APA Style

Yakymchuk, A., & Rataj, M. A. (2025). Economic Analysis of Fossil CO2 Emissions: A European Perspective on Sustainable Development. Energies, 18(8), 2106. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18082106

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop