Economic Analysis of Fossil CO2 Emissions: A European Perspective on Sustainable Development
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- This research begins with the compilation of extensive global datasets on fossil CO2 emissions, categorized by source (coal, oil, natural gas) and region. Data on economic indicators, including GDP, industrial output, energy consumption, and population demographics, are gathered from reputable international sources and national statistical agencies (Table 1). The analysis considers data spanning from 1950 to 2023 to track historical trends and future projections of CO2 emissions, shedding light on the evolving relationship between energy use, economic growth, and environmental sustainability (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
- A comparative analysis is undertaken to compare the fossil CO2 emissions intensity of European countries with global counterparts. The analysis identifies the primary factors driving differences in emission intensity, including industrial structure, energy mix, technological innovation, and policy frameworks. These cross-country comparisons provide valuable insights into best practices and offer lessons for mitigating CO2 emissions while fostering sustainable economic growth. The findings aim to inform policies that balance environmental goals with economic competitiveness.
- To evaluate the potential impact of policy changes and technological advancements, scenario analysis is conducted. Various scenarios are designed based on different assumptions about economic growth, energy transition pathways, and policy interventions. Sensitivity analysis is used to test the resilience of the results under these diverse scenarios and to pinpoint key uncertainties that could affect future emissions trajectories. This analysis is crucial for understanding how different policy measures could help meet global climate goals while ensuring economic development remains on track.
Year | World Population (millions) | CO2 Emissions (million tons) | GDP per Capita (USD) | Population Deviation (%) | CO2 Deviation (%) | GDP per Capita Deviation (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1940 | 2300 | 1500 | 1000 | - | - | - |
1950 | 2500 | 1800 | 1200 | 8.7 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
1960 | 3000 | 2200 | 1500 | 20.0 | 22.2 | 25.0 |
1970 | 3700 | 3000 | 2000 | 23.3 | 36.4 | 33.3 |
1980 | 4400 | 4500 | 3000 | 18.9 | 50.0 | 50.0 |
1990 | 5327 | 5500 | 4500 | 21.0 | 22.2 | 50.0 |
2000 | 6100 | 6800 | 5500 | 14.5 | 23.6 | 22.2 |
2010 | 6900 | 9000 | 6500 | 13.1 | 32.4 | 18.2 |
2020 | 7800 | 10,000 | 7000 | 13.0 | 11.1 | 7.7 |
3. Results
Country | Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions | Sustainable Development Policies | Carbon Pricing Mechanisms | Transition to Renewable Energy | Key Challenges | Financial Data CO2 Emissions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Austria | Low to moderate, decreasing | Climate neutrality by 2040, renewable energy target | EU ETS participation, carbon taxes | High share of hydroelectric energy, increasing wind and solar | Energy storage and grid integration, balancing renewables | EUR 5 billion investment in green energy and infrastructure (2020–2030) (Austrian Government) |
Belgium | Moderate, with a focus on natural gas | Strong focus on reducing emissions and renewable integration | Participation in EU ETS | Moderate renewable energy growth, with solar and wind | Managing nuclear phase-out, energy security concerns | EUR 4 billion in renewable energy subsidies (2020–2025) (Belgian Government) |
Den-mark | Low, significant reduction in fossil fuels | Leading in clean energy transition, climate neutrality by 2050 | High carbon tax, participation in EU ETS | Strong wind energy, offshore wind industry | High energy costs, balancing wind variability | DKK 100 billion (approx. EUR 13 billion) in renewable energy investments (2020–2030) (Danish Government) |
Ger-many | High, but decreasing (due to coal phase-out) | Strong commitment to the European Green Deal and energy transition | Emissions Trading System (ETS), carbon tax on vehicles | Significant growth in wind and solar energy | Coal phase-out, dependence on industrial sectors, energy prices | EUR 1 trillion investment required for energy transition (2020–2050) (German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy) |
France | Moderate, low per capita emissions | Energy transition, focus on nuclear and renewable energy | Participation in the EU ETS, carbon tax on fossil fuels | High nuclear energy share, increasing renewables | Nuclear dependency, balance of renewables and nuclear energy | EUR 1 trillion investment required for energy transition (2020–2050) (German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy) |
Finland | Low to moderate, decreasing fossil fuel use | Carbon neutrality target by 2035, circular economy model | Carbon tax, EU ETS participation | Focus on wind energy, bioenergy, and nuclear | Energy security, transition from nuclear and biomass | EUR 10 billion investments in renewable energy (2021–2030) (Finnish Government) |
Italy | Moderate, with significant reliance on natural gas | Focus on renewable energy integration and energy efficiency | EU ETS participation, carbon tax initiatives | Growth in solar and wind, but still reliant on gas | Balancing energy security with transition to renewables | EUR 70 billion investment in energy transition (2030–2050) (Italian Ministry of Ecological Transition) |
Poland | Very high, reliance on coal | Slow progress in energy transition, but increasing EU pressure | Participation in EU ETS, coal sector subsidies | Growing interest in wind and solar, but coal remains dominant | Coal dependence, social resistance to change, energy security | EUR 60 billion in EU funds for energy transition (2021–2027) (Polish Government) |
Spain | Moderate to high, but declining | Strong commitment to decarbonization and renewable energy targets | Participation in EU ETS | Leading in solar power, growth in wind energy | Energy storage, grid infrastructure development | EUR 22 billion investments in renewables (2020–2025) (Spanish Government) |
Sweden | Low, strong environmental performance | Ambitious climate goals, carbon neutrality by 2045 | Carbon tax, participation in EU ETS | Strong reliance on hydroelectric and wind energy | Achieving carbon neutrality in industrial sectors | EUR 45 billion (SEK 500 billion) green investments by 2030 (Swedish Government) |
Nether-lands | High, but declining | Strong push towards sustainability, green growth agenda | Participation in EU ETS, carbon tax | Significant investments in wind energy and solar | Infrastructure investment for renewables integration | EUR 13 billion investments in offshore wind by 2030 (Dutch Government) |
United King-dom | Decreasing, strong decline in coal usage | Strong policies under the Climate Change Act, net-zero target by 2050 | Carbon pricing through Carbon Price Floor (CPF) | Rapid growth in wind energy, offshore wind leadership | Managing regional economic impacts, energy security risks | GBP 30 billion (approx. EUR 35 billion) investment in green technologies (UK Government, 2020) |
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- This study underscores the need for EU countries to enhance carbon pricing mechanisms, increase renewable energy investments, and tailor policies to national economic structures. Specifically, high-emission countries should prioritize stronger emission reduction strategies, while low-emission nations should focus on sustaining their progress through continued policy support. The findings of this study emphasize the intricate interplay between population dynamics and fossil CO2 emissions, underscoring the necessity for multifaceted approaches to address climate change and promote sustainable development. By comprehending the drivers and ramifications of the mounting reliance on fossil fuels, policymakers can devise targeted interventions aimed at decoupling economic growth from carbon emissions and catalyzing a transition towards renewable energy sources. For Europe, there are several prospects in terms of reducing the negative impact of CO2 emissions: these include an increase in renewable energy usage, the stimulation of energy efficiency, the implementation of carbon targets, a transition to transport models, and the promotion of a circular economy. The authors highlight the significant role of economic growth and urbanization in driving emissions while demonstrating the effectiveness of EU environmental policies in mitigating these effects.
- The economic analysis of CO2 emissions from fossil energy sources is an important tool for developing effective policies that promote sustainable development. The European Union is actively working to reduce emissions through various economic and political mechanisms, focusing on innovation, renewable energy sources, and energy efficiency. At the same time, it is essential to ensure a fair transition to sustainable development, which will require integrating economic, environmental, and social aspects into decarbonization processes. These findings contribute to global climate change mitigation efforts by emphasizing the importance of regional policy differentiation and cooperation. As the EU strives to meet its sustainability targets, our study reinforces the urgency of integrating climate action into economic and demographic planning.
- Many EU countries have committed substantial investments in renewable energy and green technologies as part of their sustainable development strategies. Germany, Italy, and Spain are some of the largest investors, with a combined EUR 1 trillion in green investments expected over the next several decades. Countries like Denmark, Sweden, and Spain are heavily investing in renewable energy infrastructure, particularly wind and solar, to meet their carbon neutrality targets. The financial data summarized in this study indicate that the transition to cleaner energy is a significant financial undertaking. Challenges such as balancing energy security with renewable integration, coal dependence (e.g., Poland), and nuclear phase-out (e.g., Belgium) continue to require substantial financial and policy interventions.
- Demographic factors play a major role in carbon emissions, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to address the environmental impacts of population expansion. To combat climate change, strategies should not only focus on technological advancements and policies but also incorporate population dynamics, ensuring more effective mitigation of emissions. Addressing the link between population growth, economic development, and environmental sustainability requires integrated approaches. Policies should prioritize investments in renewable energy, energy efficiency, and sustainable urban planning while also promoting access to education, healthcare, and family planning services to manage population growth responsibly. Additionally, understanding the economic and health impacts of CO2 emissions is crucial for planning preventive measures at all levels, from international to local. Finally, due to the global nature of climate change, addressing the relationship between population growth and CO2 emissions requires international collaboration. Effective mitigation strategies and a transition to a low-carbon economy can be supported by sharing best practices, transferring technology, and mobilizing financial resources across borders.
- In the next publication, the authors plan to develop a correlation regression model to assess the impact of population on fossil CO2 emissions, which will highlight the importance of data-based analysis for effective policymaking. The correlation coefficient will be found, indicating the relationship between population growth and increased emissions, and the variables and vectors will be tested for multicollinearity. The model will include data from 1940, i.e., for the last 85 years, which will confirm the adequacy of the study. Future studies should focus on exploring the influence of socio-economic factors, technological innovations, and policy frameworks in shaping emission patterns across various regions and timeframes. By considering aspects of sustainable development, such as renewable energy adoption, energy efficiency, and inclusive growth, these studies can offer evidence-based recommendations for designing policies that align environmental goals with economic and social development. This approach will ensure that climate action is informed by a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing emissions, supporting more effective and sustainable mitigation strategies.
- Foresight is defined as the systematic exploration of possible future scenarios to inform decision-making and policy development. In the context of CO2 emissions and climate change, foresight can play a crucial role in identifying emerging trends, assessing future risks and opportunities, and designing proactive strategies to mitigate CO2 emissions and adapt to climate impacts. The employment of foresight methodologies, such as scenario analysis, trend analysis, and stakeholder engagement, enables policymakers, businesses, and civil society organizations to anticipate potential trajectories of CO2 emissions, explore alternative pathways for sustainable development, and identify innovative solutions to address climate challenges. The integration of foresight into decision-making processes related to CO2 emissions has the potential to enhance resilience, stimulate innovation, and facilitate the transition to a low-carbon and climate-resilient future. Policymakers must act swiftly to align population growth with emission reduction goals. Investing in clean technologies, enforcing stricter regulations, and promoting sustainable urban development will be essential in achieving long-term environmental sustainability.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- The Statistics Portal for Market Data. Available online: https://www.statista.com (accessed on 31 March 2025).
- The World Bank in Poland. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org (accessed on 9 September 2024).
- Global Debt Report 2024: Bond Markets in a High-Debt Environment; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2024. [CrossRef]
- Tenga, X.; Lub, L.C.; Chiu, Y.-H. How the European Union reaches the target of CO2 emissions under the Paris Agreement. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2020, 28, 1836–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gambhir, A.; Mittal, S.; Lamboll, R.D.; Grant, N.; Bernie, D.; Gohar, L.; Hawkes, A.; Köberle, A.; Rogelj, J.; Lowe, J.A. Adjusting 1.5 degree C climate change mitigation pathways in light of adverse new information. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- What Are the Sustainable Development Goals? 2024. Available online: https://www.sightsavers.org/policy-and-advocacy/global-goals/?gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiAy9msBhD0ARIsANbk0A8x3Z2OnYDAmW8AnYh0x_J1zig90-bAHcaScOs_SQ2D5UOCrks7GksaApPaEALw_wcB (accessed on 13 March 2025).
- Yakymchuk, A. The Carbon Dioxide Emissions’ World Footprint: Diagnosis of Perspectives. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology—Organization and Management Series. 2024. Issue No. 195. Available online: https://managementpapers.polsl.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/195-Yakymchuk.pdf (accessed on 13 March 2025).
- CO2 Emissions from EU Territorial Energy Use: −2.8%. 2023. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20230609-2 (accessed on 16 March 2025).
- Hepburn, C.; Adlen, E.; Beddington, J.; Carter, E.A.; Fuss, S.; Mac Dowell, N.; Minx, J.C.; Smith, P.; Williams, C.K. The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal. Nature 2019, 575, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Yang, Z.; Liu, L.; Zhou, D. Impact of renewable energy investment on carbon emissions in China—An empirical study using a nonparametric additive regression model. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 785, 147109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Distribution of Carbon Dioxide Emissions Worldwide in 2022, by Sector. 2024. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1129656/global-share-of-co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuel-and-cement (accessed on 5 March 2025).
- Average Monthly Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Levels in the Atmosphere Worldwide from 1990 to 2024. 2024. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1091999/atmospheric-concentration-of-co2-historic (accessed on 16 March 2025).
- Le Quéré, C.; Jackson, R.B.; Jones, M.W.; Smith, A.J.P.; Abernethy, S.; Andrew, R.M.; De-Gol, A.J.; Willis, D.R.; Shan, Y.; Canadell, J.G.; et al. Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement. Nat. Clim. Change 2020, 10, 647–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumol, W.J.; Oates, W.E. The Theory of Environmental Policy; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1988; pp. 112–115. [Google Scholar]
- Daly, H.E. Steady-State Economics: The Economics of Biophysical Equilibrium and Moral Growth; Freeman: Dallas, TX, USA, 1977; pp. 67–70. [Google Scholar]
- Brundtland, G.H. Our Common Future; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1987; pp. 43–45. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. The European Green Deal; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019; pp. 3–5. [Google Scholar]
- Hasselmann, K. Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 43–46. [Google Scholar]
- Ellerman, A.D.; Marcantonini, C. The EU Emissions Trading System and Its Post-2020 Expansion; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2016; pp. 89–91. [Google Scholar]
- How Has World Population Growth Changed Over Time? Our World in Data. 2025. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/population-growth-over-time (accessed on 5 April 2025).
- Official Site of the European Statistics Service 2024. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat (accessed on 16 March 2025).
- Ahonen, V.L.; Woszczek, A.; Baumeister, S.; Helimo, U.T.; Jackson, A.K.; Kopsakangas-Savolainen, M.; Kääriä, J.; Lehtonen, T.; Luoranen, M.; Pongrácz, E.; et al. Carbon neutral higher education institutions: A reality check, challenges and solutions. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2024, 25, 293–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kropp, T.; Lennerts, K.; Fisch, M.N.; Kley, C.; Wilken, T.; Marx, S.; Zak, J. The contribution of the German building sector to achieve the 1.5 °C target. Carbon Manag. 2022, 13, 511–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sovacool, B.K. The Politics of Renewable Energy Transitions; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2021; pp. 112–114. [Google Scholar]
- Yakymchuk, A.; Maxand, S.; Lewandowska, A. Economic Analysis of Global CO2 Emissions and Energy Consumption Based on the World Kaya Identity. Energies 2025, 18, 1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Markandya, A.; González-Eguino, M. Integrated Assessment for Identifying Climate Finance Needs for Loss and Damage: A Critical Review. In Loss and Damage from Climate Change. Climate Risk Management; Mechler, R., Bouwer, L., Schinko, T., Surminski, S., Linnerooth-Bayer, J., Eds.; Policy and Governance; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schneider, M. Energy Transition and Sustainability; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 56–59. [Google Scholar]
- Fouquet, R. Consumer Surplus from Energy Transitions. Energy J. 2023, 39, 167–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, D. Renewable Energy Technologies: Sustainability and Environmental Impacts; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 113–115. [Google Scholar]
- Davis, S.J.; Caldeira, K.; Matthews, H.D. Implications of Existing Energy Infrastructure for Future CO2 Emissions Trajectories. Environ. Res. Lett. 2010, 5, 300–320. [Google Scholar]
- Creutzig, F.; Jochem, P.; Edelenbosch, O.Y.; Mattauch, L.; Vuuren, D.P.; McCollum, D.; Minx, J. Transport: A roadblock to climate change mitigation? Science 2015, 350, 911–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Griffiths, I.; Wang, R.; Ling-Chin, J.; Roskilly, A.P. Solid oxide fuel cells with integrated direct air carbon capture: A techno-economic study. Energy Convers. Manag. 2024, 315, 118739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edenhofer, O.; Lessmann, K.; Kemfert, C.; Grubb, M.; Koehler, J. Induced Techno logical Change: Exploring its Implications for the Economics of Atmospheric Stabilization: Synthesis Report from the Innovation Modeling Comparison Project. Energy J. 2006, 27, 57–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development. 2015. Available online: https://www.ticketforchange.org/become-a-changemaker-mooc (accessed on 16 March 2025).
- Fischer, C.; Newell, R. Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2008, 55, 142–162. Available online: https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jeeman/v55y2008i2p142-162.html (accessed on 16 March 2025). [CrossRef]
- Smith, A.; Johnson, B. Renewable Energy Policies and Job Creation: The Case of Poland. Renew. Energy 2020, 112, 14–22. [Google Scholar]
- Carbon Dioxide Emissions of the Most Polluting Countries Worldwide in 2010 and 2022. 2024. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/270499/co2-emissions-in-selected-countries/ (accessed on 16 March 2025).
- CO2 Emissions per Capita vs. Population Growth. 2022. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/co2-emissions-vs-gdp (accessed on 16 March 2025).
- Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions in the European Union in 2022, by Key Source. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1462166/main-co2-emissions-sources-european-union-eu (accessed on 16 March 2025).
- Wang, Q.; Su, M. Drivers of decoupling economic growth from carbon emission—An empirical analysis of 192 countries using decoupling model and decomposition method. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2020, 81, 106356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crippa, M.; Guizzardi, D.; Pagani, F.; Banja, M.; Muntean, M.; Schaaf, E.; Monforti-Ferrario, F.; Becker, W.E.; Quadrelli, R.; Risquez Martin, A.; et al. GHG Emissions of All World Countries; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2023; Available online: https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/booklet/GHG_emissions_of_all_world_countries_booklet_2023report.pdf (accessed on 16 March 2025).
- Knight, K.W.; Rosa, E.A.; Schor, J.B. Could working less reduce pressures on the environment? A cross-national panel analysis of OECD countries, 1970–2007. Glob. Environ. Change 2013, 23, 691–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Environment Agency. Trends and Projections in Europe 2021: Tracking Progress Towards Europe’s Climate and Energy Targets; European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2021; 41p, ISBN 978-92-9480-392-4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grubb, M.; Gupta, J. Climate Change and European Leadership. A Sustainable Role for Europe? Springer Nature: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000; Available online: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-94-017-1049-7 (accessed on 16 March 2025).
- Parry, I.W.H. Fiscal Policies for Sustainable Development; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2018; pp. 78–80. [Google Scholar]
- Jędrzejowska, K.; Wróbel, A. Gospodarka Światowa 2022–2023: Czas Niepewności, Niepokoju i Postępującej Fragmentacji. Rocznik Strategiczny 2022. 2022. Available online: https://wnpism.uw.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/08_Gospodarka_KJedrzejowska_AWrobel.pdf (accessed on 16 March 2025).
- Jiang, Y.; Ren, Z.; Lu, C.; Li, H.; Yang, Z. A region-based low-carbon operation analysis method for integrated electricity-hydrogen-gas systems. Appl. Energy 2024, 355, 122230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamilton, L. Education, Politics and Opinions About Climate Change Evidence for Interaction Effects. Clim. Change 2010, 104, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Creutzig, F.; Agoston, P.; Goldschmidt, J.C.; Luderer, G.; Nemet, G.; Pietzcker, R.C. The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 17140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Böhringer, C.; Löschel, A. Promoting Renewable Energy in Europe: A Hybrid Computable General Equilibrium Approach. Energy J. 2006, 27 (Suppl. S2), 135–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IEA. World Energy Outlook; International Energy Agency (IEA): Paris, France, 2024; Volume 3, pp. 50–75. [Google Scholar]
- Statistics Poland GUS. Available online: https://sdg.gov.pl (accessed on 16 March 2025).
- IPCC Sixth Assessment Report. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Geneva, Switzerland, 2021; Volume 1, pp. 200–250.
- Wright, R.M.; Quéré, C.L.; Mayot, N.; Olsen, A.; Bakker, D. Fingerprint of climate change on Southern Ocean carbon storage. ESS Open Arch. 2022. Available online: https://essopenarchive.org/doi/full/10.1002/essoar.10512597.1 (accessed on 5 March 2025).
- van Vuuren, D.P.; Riahi, K.; Calvin, K.V.; Dellink, R.B.; Emmerling, J.; Fujimori, S.; Kc, S.; Kriegler, E.; O’Neill, B. The Shared Socio-economic Pathways: Trajectories for human development and global environmental change. Glob. Environ. Change 2017, 42, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Gross National Income (GNI) Indicator; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): Paris, France, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golub, A. Analysis of Climate Policies with GDyn-E. GTAP Technical Paper. 2013. Available online: https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/res_display.asp?RecordID=4292 (accessed on 16 March 2025).
- Annual Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Worldwide from 1940 to 2023. 2024. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/276629/global-co2-emissions/ (accessed on 16 March 2025).
Category | Instrument | Description | Impact | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|
Renewable Energy | Wind and Solar Power | Replacing fossil fuels with sustainable energy sources | Reduces emissions, increases sustainability | European Green Deal (2019) [17]; Wang Q., et al. (2016) [40]; Tenga, X., et al. (2020) [4]; A. Golub, et al. (2013) [57]; Brundtland, G.H. (1987) [16]; Creutzig, et al. (2015) [31]. |
Hydropower and Geothermal | Utilizing natural energy sources for electricity generation | Lowers carbon footprint | Markandya, A., et al. (2019) [26]; Wang Q., et al. (2016) [40]; Yakymchuk A. (2024) [7]; Van Vuuren, D. P., et al. (2017) [55]; Yakymchuk A., et al. (2025) [25]. | |
Energy Efficiency | Smart Grid Technology | Optimizing energy distribution to minimize waste | Improves energy efficiency | C. Hamilton (2011) [48]; Wang Q., et al. (2016) [40]; Yakymchuk A. (2024) [7]; C.Böhringer, et al. (2006) [50]; Global Debt Report (2024) [3]; Kropp T., et al. (2022) [23]. |
Green Building Standards | Energy-efficient materials and technology in construction | Reduces energy consumption | Jędrzejowska, K., & Wróbel, A. (2022) [46]; Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development (2015) [34]; Wang, Q., & Su, M. (2020) [40]; European Green Deal (2019) [17]; Ahonen, V., et al. (2024) [22]. | |
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) | Direct Air Capture | Removing CO2 from the atmosphere | Reduces greenhouse gases | Wang Q., et al. (2016) [40]; Yakymchuk A. (2024) [7]; C. Böhringer, et al. (2006) [50]; Xiangyu Tenga, et al., (2020) [4]; Markandya, A., & González-Eguino, M. (2019) [26]. |
Carbon Sequestration | Storing CO2 underground or using it in industry | Prevents emissions from entering the air | Wang Q., et al. (2016) [40]; Yakymchuk A. (2024) [7]; Xiangyu Tenga et al. (2020) [4]; Gambhir, A., et al., (2023) [5]; Qingyun Zhao, et al., (2024) [4]; Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2020) [36]. | |
Sustainable Transportation | Electric Vehicles (EVs) | Replacing internal combustion engines with electric motors | Lowers transportation-related CO2 emissions | Kropp T. (2022) [23]; European Green Deal (2019) [17]; Wang Q., et al. (2016) [40]; C. Böhringer, et al. (2006) [50]; Knight, K.W.; et al. (2013) [42]; Hamilton, L. (2010) [48]. |
Public Transit Expansion | Increasing public transport options to reduce car dependency | Reduces traffic-related emissions | Griffiths, I., et al. (2024) [32]; Wang Q., et al. (2016) [40]; Yakymchuk A. (2024) [7]; C. Böhringer, et al. (2006) [50]; Distribution of Carbon Dioxide Emissions Worldwide in 2022 (2024) [11]; Davis, S.J., et al. (2010) [30]; Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2020) [36]. | |
Policy and Regulation | Carbon Pricing (Tax, Cap-and-Trade) | Financial incentives to reduce CO2 emissions | Encourages businesses to cut emissions | Edenhofer, O., et al. (2006) [33]; Wang Q., et al., (2016) [40]; Yakymchuk A. (2024) [7]; Kropp, T., et al. (2022) [23]. |
Green Technology Subsidies | Government support for renewable energy and innovations | Accelerates transition to clean energy | Schneider, M. (2018) [27]; Baumol, W.J., & Oates, W.E. (1988) [14]; Daly, H.E. (1977) [15]; Brundtland, G.H. (1987) [16], Ellerman, A.D., & Marcantonini, C. (2016) [19]; European Commission (2023) [41]; Hasselmann, K. (2007) [18]; Zhou, D. (2020) [29]; Parry, I.W.H. (2018) [45]. | |
Industrial Decarbonization | Hydrogen Fuel Development | Using green hydrogen as a clean energy alternative | Decreases reliance on fossil fuels | Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2020) [36]; Fouquet, R. (2023) [28]; Le Quéré, C., et al. (2020) [13]; Daly, H.E. (1977) [15]; Ellerman, A.D., & Marcantonini, C. (2016) [19]; European Commission (2023) [41]; Hasselmann, K. (2007) [18]; Parry, I.W.H. (2018) [45]; Sovacool, B.K. (2021) [24]; How Has World Population Growth Changed (2025) [20]. |
Circular Economy Practices | Recycling and waste reduction in production | Reduces resource depletion | Daly, H.E. (1977) [15]; Brundtland, G.H. (1987) [16], Ellerman, A.D., & Marcantonini, C. (2016) [19]; European Commission (2023) [41]; Hasselmann K., (2007) [18]; Zhou, D. (2020) [45]; Sovacool, B.K. (2021) [24]; Yakymchuk, A., et al. (2025) [25]. | |
Nature-Based Solutions | Reforestation and Afforestation | Planting trees to absorb CO2 | Increases carbon capture | Parry, I.W.H. (2018) [45]; Sovacool, B.K. (2021) [24]. Brundtland, G.H. (1987) [16], Ellerman, A.D., & Marcantonini, C. (2016) [19]; European Commission, (2023) [41]; Hasselmann, K. (2007) [18]; Zhou, D. (2020) [45]; Stern, N. (2024) [6]. |
Blue Carbon Ecosystems | Protecting coastal and marine habitats that store carbon | Enhances natural carbon sinks | Creutzig F., et al. (2015) [31]; Wang Q., et al. (2016) [40]; Yakymchuk A. (2024) [7]; Stern, N. (2024) [6]; Fischer, C, & Newell, R. (2008) [35]; Jiang, Y., et al. (2024) [47]; Smith, A., & Johnson (2020) [36]; Kropp T., et al. (2022) [23]. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yakymchuk, A.; Rataj, M.A. Economic Analysis of Fossil CO2 Emissions: A European Perspective on Sustainable Development. Energies 2025, 18, 2106. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18082106
Yakymchuk A, Rataj MA. Economic Analysis of Fossil CO2 Emissions: A European Perspective on Sustainable Development. Energies. 2025; 18(8):2106. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18082106
Chicago/Turabian StyleYakymchuk, Alina, and Małgorzata Agnieszka Rataj. 2025. "Economic Analysis of Fossil CO2 Emissions: A European Perspective on Sustainable Development" Energies 18, no. 8: 2106. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18082106
APA StyleYakymchuk, A., & Rataj, M. A. (2025). Economic Analysis of Fossil CO2 Emissions: A European Perspective on Sustainable Development. Energies, 18(8), 2106. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18082106