Next Article in Journal
Exploring Accessibility and Its Impact in the Mountain City: A Typical Case Study of Nyingchi City, Tibet Autonomous Region, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Urban Areas as Potential Sinks for Tropical Swallowtail Moth Lyssa zampa
Previous Article in Journal
Land Take and Landslide Hazard: Spatial Assessment and Policy Implications from a Study Concerning Sardinia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification of Facade Elements of Traditional Areas in Seoul, South Korea
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Land
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/land12020360
land-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pull and Push Drivers of Giant-Wave Spectators in Nazaré, Portugal: A Cultural Ecosystem Services Assessment Based on Geo-Tagged Photos

by
António Azevedo
School of Economics and Management, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
Land 2023, 12(2), 360; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020360
Submission received: 24 December 2022 / Revised: 11 January 2023 / Accepted: 16 January 2023 / Published: 28 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ecology of the Landscape Capital and Urban Capital)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This paper maps the cultural ecosystem services (CES) of a well-known giant-wave hotspot located in Nazaré, Portugal. The paper adopts a qualitative approach combining an auto-ethnographic direct observation of a journey and the content analysis of photos and videos posted on the YouTube and Facebook pages of tourists and operators. A total of 44 geotagged photos from a sample of 6914 photos retrieved from Flickr allowed the classification and spatial distribution of several CES: (1) recreational—surf activities; (2) aesthetic—photography; (3) spiritual—dark tourism and risk recreation; (4) intangible heritage—maritime knowledge; (5) scientific—wave height forecast; (6) sense of place; and (7) social relations. The paper also proposes a theoretical framework that highlights the pull drivers (risk recreation, storm chasing, or spectacular death voyeurism) and the push drivers (e.g., marketing campaigns and wave forecasts alerts) that explain the behaviors of the big-wave spectators/chasers during the experience journey. Public decision-makers, destination marketing organizations, tourism operators, and business entrepreneurs must acknowledge the relevance of journey mapping in order to identify the moments of stress and the touchpoints associated with peak/positive experiences generated by these CES. This study confirms some push and pull factors assessed by previous studies.

1. Introduction

The coastal town of Nazaré in Portugal became the “mecca” of giant waves (see Figure 1) when, on 1 November 2011, Garret McNamara rode a giant wave 1. The process of adaptation and training started two years before (2009), when the Nazaré Municipal authorities challenged the surfer to test the uniqueness of their waves. The international recognition of the waves was achieved through several world Guinness records and World Surf League (WSL) awards. The whole story is portrayed in the HBO documentary “One hundred-foot wave” 2.
The awareness of Nazaré as a surf tourism destination exponentially increased with the publication of photographs of surfers riding the waves and beating Guinness records 3. Since then, the international media has been highlighting the shift in the strategic positioning of this small fisherman’s town, from a (summer) beach destination to a (winter) giant-wave surfing/chasing destination 4.
Land 12 00360 g001 550
Figure 1. Nazaré, Portugal (location map): surfer riding a big wave, the rescue team of water bikes and the spectators/big-wave chasers. Source: Facebook page of “Praia do Norte” 5.
Figure 1. Nazaré, Portugal (location map): surfer riding a big wave, the rescue team of water bikes and the spectators/big-wave chasers. Source: Facebook page of “Praia do Norte” 5.
Land 12 00360 g001
Table 1 shows the evolution of the number of hotel guests from 2010 (before the buzz marketing around Nazaré) and 2019 (the year before the COVID-19 pandemic). It increased 295% in this nine-year period, from 44,931 to 132,466 tourists per year. The highest increase occurred among USA tourists. This positive effect on tourism for Nazaré is a direct consequence of Garret McNamara’s accomplishment in November of 2011 [1]. Nevertheless, according to Statistics Portugal, Nazaré’s population has decreased from 14,383 inhabitants in 2009 to 14,180 in 2018. However, during the big wave periods, the town’s population increases ten-fold, to almost 100,000 people [2].
The Nazaré Canyon is an undersea canyon just off the coast of Nazaré, Portugal, in the Eastern Atlantic Ocean. It has a maximum depth of at least 5000 m (16,000 ft) and is about 230 km long [3]. The Hydrographic Institute explains big waves as immense swells emerging from the west and northwest directions entering the coastal region. The wave’s refraction is based on the differences between the canyon’s depth and the continental shelf. This causes a change in the direction through the canyon, which leads to an increase in speed. According to the steep vertical variation of the canyon, the depth reduction causes a shoaling effect, which means that the wave length is reduced while an increase in the wave height occurs [4,5].
This paper maps and evaluates the cultural ecosystem services (CES) of this giant-wave hotspot. Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) are defined as “the non-material and intangible benefits arising from multi-dimensional human-nature relationships, such as cultural heritage, place identity, spiritual enrichment, cognitive development and learning” [6].
The phenomenon of giant waves in Nazaré has received the attention of several researchers [1,2,7,8].
Nevertheless, there is a gap in the literature because the assessment and spatial mapping of the cultural ecosystem services provided by this nature attraction were not investigated in previous studies. Moreover, the extant literature did not analyze the relationship between these CES and the push and pull drivers of several groups of individuals/stakeholders who play different roles and perform different activities in this coastal hotspot. Furthermore, few papers have examined the motivations and behaviors of water sport spectators.
Therefore, this paper provides an innovative contribution to the field and investigates the following research questions:
RQ1.
What kind of cultural ecosystem services (CES) are provided by the Nazaré undersea canyon? In particular, this paper will focus on the recreational, aesthetical, and spiritual CES that are imbedded in the surf tourism experience journey.
RQ2.
What are the influences of external factors on the spatial distribution of cultural services?
RQ3.
What are the push/pull motivations and drivers of the giant-wave chasers/spectators?
Furthermore, research into the customer experience/customer journey has received attention from several authors [9,10,11,12], as well as the tourism and hospitality industry [13,14,15,16]. Lemon and Verhoef (p. 71) defined customer experience as a “multidimensional construct focusing on a customer’s cognitive, emotional, behavioral, sensorial and social responses to a firm’s offerings during the customer’s entire purchase journey” [17]. Moreover, Bolton et al. conceptualized customer experiences within a three-dimensional space, bringing together the digital, physical, and social realms [18]. Therefore, a fourth research question emerged:
RQ4.
How is the giant-wave tourist’s experience journey? This paper provides a new tool for destination managers and tourism operators by proposing a holistic theoretical framework that describes the influences of the push and pull drivers at different stages of the tourist’s journey.
The paper adopted a qualitative approach by combining photos taken during auto-ethnographic direct observation and the content analysis of the description of geotagged photos with videos from social media platforms, such as YouTube, Facebook, and Flickr.

2. Literature Review

This section presents the state-of-art of the previous studies regarding the classification and mapping of coastal cultural ecosystem services. This study assesses the pull and push factors of CES that benefit several categories of individuals: (1) big-wave surfers; (2) risk recreationists (non-big-wave surfers); (3) big-wave spectators/storm chasers; (4) local residents; (5) the firms of big-wave surf clusters that provide support services and products of this sport (e.g., hospitality and accommodation, safety, rescue crews, protection clothing, and equipment); (6) cultural heritage tourists. Because the giant-wave season is in the winter, this paper did not consider sun and beach tourists.

2.1. Mapping Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES)

Several attempts were made to map marine and coastal ecosystem services (ES) [19,20,21]. The literature provides solid theoretical and scientific support for the use of Flickr geotagged photos in order to assess and valuate recreational and aesthetic CES [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29].
Moreover, an increasing number of studies are examining the distribution and congruence of ecosystem services, often with the goal of identifying areas that will provide multiple ecosystem service hotspots. There is paucity of data on most ecosystem services and, therefore, proxies are frequently used to map their distribution [30,31,32,33,34,35,36].
The classification taxonomy of marine and coastal CES, developed by the Common International Classification of Ecosystem services (CICES) v5.1 [37], comprises the following eleven categories: (1) recreation and leisure; (2) aesthetic; (3) cultural heritage and identity; (4) spiritual, sacred and/or religious; (5) educational; (6) inspiration for culture, art and design; (7) sense of place; (8) social relations; (9) scientific; (10) existence; and (11) intellectual and representative interactions (group). Garcia Rodrigues et al. made an exhaustive list of all the terms and labels that were found in the literature concerning the coastal CES for each category [38].

2.2. Motivations and Segmentation of the Demand for Coastal and Marine Destinations

This paper examines other specific motivators and segmentation criteria that explain the demand of the coastal CES. Carvache-Franco et al. (2019, 2020) identified six motivational factors for choosing coastal destinations: authentic coastal experience, heritage and nature, learning, novelty and social interaction, physical activities, and sun and beach [39,40]. These authors showed the existence of two segments of visitors: (1) “Beach lovers” formed by tourists who have high motivations in such aspects related to the sun and the beach; (2) “multiple coastal motives”, i.e., grouped tourists who have high values in all the motivational dimensions. Moreover, Nagy et al. made a segment analysis of water sport tourism and the cluster analysis yielded four clusters based on sports and tourism motivations, namely: sports-oriented, leisure-ignoring, leisure-oriented, and social-oriented groups [41].

2.3. Recreation and Leisure

2.3.1. Risk Recreation (Big-Wave Surfers and Active Risk Recreationists)

According to Fluker (p. 7), surf tourism can be defined as [42]: “the act of people traveling to either domestic locations for a period of time not exceeding six months, or international locations for a period of time not exceeding twelve months, who stay at least one night, and where the active participation in the sport of surfing, where the surfer relies on the power of the wave for forward momentum, is the primary motivation for destination selection” [43].
Nazaré is a destination for giant-wave surfers, who may be classified into the category of active (extreme) risk recreation tourists. Boudreau et al. defined adventure recreation as “self-initiated nature-based physical activities that generate heightened bodily sensations (e.g., vestibular sensations arising from quick acceleration in varying dimensions of space) and require skill development to manage unique perceived and objective risks (p. 2)” [44].
At the ‘extreme’ end of the nature sport spectrum (e.g., activities such as B.A.S.E. (buildings, antennae, space, earth) jumping, big=wave surfing, waterfall kayaking, rope-free climbing), the most likely outcome of a mismanaged error or accident is death. Thus, many psychologists view this behavior as irrational and deviant, resulting from ignorance or the inability to self-regulate [45]. This extreme sport is not only performed by men; in Nazaré, it is common to see female surfers, such as Maya Gabeira (Brasil), Joana Andrade (Portugal), and Justine Dupont (France) [46].
According to systematic literature reviews by Boudreau et al. [44] and Gstaettner et al. [47], there are several explanations for participation in adventure recreation (e.g., opportunities for mastery, overcoming fear, socializing, identity construction, connecting with nature) [48,49,50]. Giddy and Webb compiled nine push factors that are determinants of the conditions and significance of the environment, which in turn are positively correlated with the satisfaction in adventure tourism: thrill, risk, physical challenge/skills development, enjoying nature/nature appreciation, overcoming nature, environmental education, novelty, escapism, and socialization [51].
Risk recreation activities also foster hedonic, eudaemonic, and therapeutic aspects of subjective well-being (SWB) by supporting the satisfaction of basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, relatedness, and beneficence [44,52,53], or the search for freedom [54].
Giddy and Webb claimed that a recent probing of risk/thrill-seeking notions surrounding motivations and experiences has led to the identification of a wider range of psychological states, such as ‘rush,’ ‘edgework,’ or ‘flow’ [49,51,55,56]. Boudreau et al. proposed that experiencing a flow state (i.e., an effortless and enjoyable state of feeling deeply in control and fully immersed in an activity) may provide a strong motivation for continued participation in adventure recreation [44,57,58,59]. This theory is similar to the adventure experience paradigm (AEP) of Martin and Priest [60], which predicts peak adventure as a consequence of a balance in perceived risk and competence [61]. Flow—since its conception—has been studied in adventure recreation contexts and it is a particularly important motive for big-wave surfers [62,63,64,65].
Moreover, Clough et al. and Buckley claimed that some self-achievement experiences involve potential physical risks; they may awake the euphoria related to heroic overcoming of challenges and the encounter with natural primitiveness [66,67].
The “absorption” factor established by Magyaródi et al. includes the other dimensions of the original concept (items about engagement, the quality of the experience, change of time perception, or forgetting about the environment) [68].

2.3.2. Sensation Seeking, Gaze, and Spectacular Death Voyeurism (Passive Big-Wave Spectators)

This paper extends the understanding of risk recreation motivation to those who enjoy watching others performing risk recreation activities (see Table 2). For example, commercial adventure tourists, although drawn to an activity for the sake of risk, fear, and excitement, simultaneously felt safe and protected within commercial operating settings [69] and admitted that ‘it’s more like watching an exciting but consequence-free film of [an adventure activity] than being in one’ (p. 18) [70].
The act of watching in tourism is associated with the concept of “tourist gaze” introduced by the sociologist Urry, who argued that the centrality of the visual in contemporary culture is mirrored in tourism, and that our desires to visit places and the ways we learn to visually appreciate those places are not merely individual and autonomous but are socially organized [71]. Moreover, the act of watching is also in the definition of sport tourism of Gibson (p. 10): “leisure-based travel that takes individuals temporarily outside of their home communities to play, watch physical activities or venerate attractions associated with these activities” [72].
There are few studies that investigate sporting events from the perspective of spectators [73]. Horbel et al. found that the context of value creation is positively associated with the “service ecosystem of a sport event” [74]. Sporting events offer immersive “servicescapes” [75], experiencescapes, or sensoryscapes [76], which can enhance the value of the experience [77,78].
For example, Wang et al. [79] studied the phenomenon of tidal bore-watching activities in China, which is a phenomenon caused by the leading edge of the incoming tide forming a wave of water that travels up a river or narrow bay against the prevailing current [80]. Regarding tide-watching, visitors tend to believe that it involves relatively low risk, because most people watch tidal bores by standing along the riverbank. Such perceptions, however, ignore the strong power and unpredictability of a tidal bore, which may open up the possibility of tourists being hurt or whirled away by “tsunami-like” tides.
The motivation to watch surfers riding giant waves can be explained by the seeking for adrenalin and thrill sensations triggered by the imminent death risk of this extreme sport spectacle [81,82]. Zuckerman defined sensation seeking construct as: “a personality trait defined by the seeking of varied, novel, complex and intense sensations and experiences, and the willingness to take physical, social, legal and financial risks for the sake of such experience” (p. 27) [83].

2.4. Spiritual, Sacred, and/or Religious: Storm-Chasing and Awe-Inspiring Experiences

The proneness to watch the dangerous performances of big-wave riders can be associated with lighter dark tourism theories and motivators, such as [84]:
(a)
The concept of “thanatopsis,” defined by Stone [85] as “the reflection and contemplation of death and dying” usually present in dark tourism also related with the notion of “death drive” [86,87].
(b)
The psychoanalytical notion of “voyeurism” of the spectacular death and death desire [88,89,90,91].
(c)
The notion of “mortality salience”, defined by Gordillo et al. as the “awareness of the inevitability of one’s own death…” (p. 286) [92,93,94].
(d)
The terror management theory, which states that human beings are uniquely aware of their own mortality leading, in turn, to fear or terror of death. Consequently, various strategies are used within everyday life to manage such terror [85,86,95].
The giant-wave phenomenon is usually associated with winter storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic Ocean. Therefore, there is an overlap between risk recreation and storm-chasing tourism. Part of the motives that attract people to Nazaré is the unique combination of nature elements that is enhanced by the storms season in the winter. Several studies aimed to understand the interest in severe weather that spur people to embark on storm-chasing tourism [96,97]. Boulais focused on the ways severe weather was depicted in participants’ discourse and on storm-chasing companies’ websites [98]. Data revealed six non-mutually exclusive depictions of severe weather: passion, a spectacular sight, a dangerous encounter, a rewarding challenge, a treat, and a reminder of humanity’s powerlessness.
Giant waves can trigger stimuli for extraordinary, ‘pure’, ‘peak’, ‘transcendent’, or ‘cathartic’ episodes/experiences, because awe emotions can be generated when individuals confront natural wonders, inspired by the sacred or mystic aura of the place [99,100,101].
Pearce et al. defined awe as an intense (and usually positive) emotion often experienced by individuals visiting nature-based tourism destinations; it has the potential to nurture strong connections between individuals and their environment [101]. Bonner and Friedman [102] provided a conceptual clarification of the complexity and multifaceted nature of the concept of awe proposed by Schneider [103]. They identified ten themes that helped to explain the concept of awe: profoundness, connectedness, numinous, vastness, existential awareness, openness and acceptance, ineffable wonder, presence, heightened perception, and fear.

2.5. Sense of Place and Social Relations: Socioeconomic Implications for the Local Community (Local Residents and Firms/Investors of the Surf Cluster)

The giant-wave phenomenon also leverages CES related with the sense of place and the identity building of Nazaré residents, who have social interactions/relations with visitors, in particular giant-wave chasers and surf tourists. Surfing, as a lifestyle, has been grounded in surf culture, which is recognized as a potential attraction factor for certain surf destinations. The perceptions of the surf culture contribute to a better overall destination image and a higher loyalty towards the destination [104].
In order to understand the transformation of Nazaré from the anthropological and sociological perspectives, Ferreira made an ethnographic film 6 of the daily life activities and imaginary activities after the big-wave “boom” [105]. This documentary captures the emotions, the sense of place, and the identity traces of Nazaré local people and how their pride and self-esteem have increased since the town started to attract international tourists.
On the other hand, Cunha-e-Sá et al. estimated the economic impact of a three-year media campaign involving private and public institutions to promote big waves and tourism, launched by Nazaré Qualifica and the municipality of Nazaré [8]. After this marketing media campaign, the site became a more popular tourist destination by providing the required “informational media infrastructure” campaign that allowed for the worldwide recognition of the value of big waves.
Cunha-e-Sá et al. estimated that the number of domestic visitors (42,161) and international visitors (35,500) whose average expenditures per visitor and trip were, respectively, EUR 72 and 92. According to an optimistic scenario, the economic impact for the four-year period (2010–2014) was about EUR 10 million. Overall, the total reported expenditures related to big waves were EUR 283,847 during 2010–2013, of which, EUR 26,948 were public expenditures; that is, investments of the local municipality [8].
Nevertheless, Wieser [2] and Bradsahw [7] also addressed some negative consequences of the tourism boom in Nazaré, especially in terms of the social impacts in residents’ quality of life and the potential negative environmental implications. Bradshaw rose the question: “When the weather systems give the green light for big waves, surf enthusiasts flood the town head to the cliff tops in the hope of witnessing goliath waves, but at what cost are these new visitors on Nazaré’s social carrying capacity?” [7]. Crowding and exceeding carrying capacity are factors that threaten the sustainability of surf tourism destinations [106].

2.6. Other Types of Cultural Ecosystem Services: Aesthetic, Cultural Heritage, Inspiration for Culture, Art and Design, Scientific, and Educational (Cultural Heritage Tourists)

Furthermore, there are other CES that benefit the cultural heritage tourists and the local community. According to Iliev [107], there is a strong motivation on the side of the tourists to engage in the pleasure of aesthetics that allow simulation and encourage emotion. Nazaré also inspires projects related to culture and art, such as the Nazaré Criativa project, which promotes local cultural heritage, particularly, living traditions and unique places, going far beyond what is offered in terms of experiences and activities in Nazaré [108]. All activities revolve around stories, traditions, presentations, places, and people of Nazaré.
Regarding the scientific and educational CES, Carapuço et al. claimed that selecting the adequate communication trigger effectively boosts scientific knowledge transfer and raises the predisposition conditions for the audience to be receptive of non-trivial ocean-related scientific topics [109]. “The Nazaré Wave: a trigger for learning” was revealed to be a highly successful initiative and similar strategies may be adopted in other projects aimed at increasing coastal and ocean literacy. The cluster of the surf, which comprises several products (surf boards, wetsuits, and big-wave gear items) and services (schools of surf, water bikes rescue teams, etc.), has been increasing as a direct consequence of this scientific development.

3. Methodology

This paper assesses and maps the deep motivations/pull drivers of giant-wave spectators. Therefore, this study adopts an interpretivist/ constructivist paradigm by combining different qualitative methods, such as an auto-ethnographic direct observation and the content analysis of videos and geotagged photos retrieved from social media platforms, such as YouTube, Facebook, and Flickr. Flickr is a major image-sharing website, with more than 60 million monthly active users (in 2022) who upload 1 million photos worldwide daily, according to Yahoo reports. Using Flickr’s API method, called flickr.photos.search, the author was able to extract 6914 public photos taken in a 5 km radio around Nazaré’s lighthouse building, located at a latitude of 39.60698 and longitude of −9.08402. These photos were taken by 165 photographers who traveled from 30 different countries. The majority came from Portugal (19.3%), followed by Spain (15.1%), the USA (11.4%), France (9%), and Italy (9%).
The method extracted the following relevant information: photo ID, owner ID, taken date of photo, title, tags, latitude, longitude, accuracy, number of views, text description, and URL. Here is the link of the API method used. In order to access the metadata of the photos, the reader must ask Flickr a researcher API Key code and replace the string “[researcher API key]” in the formula:
https://www.flickr.com/services/rest/?method=flickr.photos.search&api_key=[researcher API key] &user_id=&content_type=1&lat=39.60698&lon=-9.08402&radius=5&radius_units=km&extras=description%2C+date_taken%2C+owner_name%2C+tags%2C+views%2C+url_o&format=rest (accessed on 31 October 2022)
The use of visual anthropology, (including visual auto-ethnography and photo elicitation) as research methods is well supported in the literature [110,111,112,113,114,115]. Visual research methods usually collect: (1) ‘found’ images (pre-existing photographs and film); (2) researcher created images; and (3) respondent-created or user-generated images.

4. Discussion of Results

Section 4.1 presents the author’s auto-ethnographic journey that allowed the assessment of the push and pull factors of giant-wave spectators/storm chasers linked to recreational, aesthetic, and spiritual CES. The content analysis of the Flickr photos presented in Section 4.2 complements the assessment of the CES that benefit the residents, the firms of the surf clusters, and the cultural heritage tourists.

4.1. Auto-Ethnographic Study: Mapping Journey of “Giant Waves” Chaser Tourists

On 25 February of 2022, the author traveled to Nazaré to watch the “giant waves” phenomenon. The journey started several weeks before, with the daily monitoring of several websites 7 that forecast the significant wave heights. There are also webcams 8 that allow tourists to confirm the quality of the swell before traveling to Praia do Norte.
Mach et al. described this journey using the term ‘surgical strike’ that has been co-opted into the surfing vernacular to differentiate a particular surf trip, which can be domestic or international, where a surfer targets a specific surf-break based on detailed forecasting data and a deep understanding of the variable factors that lead to the best possible conditions at that surf-break [116]. Real Watersports describes them this way: “‘Surgical strikes’ are when you travel specifically for perfect weather conditions (swell/wind or both) rather than on a calendar like most humans do... Recreational enthusiasts should partake in at least one surgical strike in their lifetime—and probably many more…If you only have two weeks off a year and you miss the epic score during your break, then you have to wait another year to roll those 2/52 odds again. Strike out too many years in a row and it starts to really eat at you” [117].
Then, on 21 February, four days before, the forecast for the wave height according to several sources was about 10 m (which can increase three-fold due to the canyon effect), reaching the maximum rating of 10 points (See Figure 2). Because most hotels in Nazaré only allow free cancelation of the booking until three/four days before the date of arrival, tourists have to make the decision to travel based on the odds that the forecast is correct.
Early in the morning on 25 February, hundreds of “giant-waves” pilgrims walked to the surroundings of the Praia do Norte beach in order to obtain the best spot to watch the waves. Figure 3 presents four photos taken by the author during the ethnographic trip, showing the crowd that patiently waited for the “biggest” one, hoping that a surfer in the water rode it, and earned applause, similar to an acrobat in the circus. A successful (sometimes epic) riding excites the crowd and triggers peak emotions, as portrayed in some videos shared on social media 9.
For example, the Facebook page of Praia do Norte 10 published several photos of that day, which complemented the analysis of the journey. Those photos and videos shared by the spectators to YouTube that day (see Table 3) are examples of the electronic word-of-mouth during the advocacy/post-experience stage. During the journey, it was possible to confirm the influence of some push factors (waves forecasting; social media alerts) that ignited the pull factors that emerged in the literature review, such as willingness to connect with nature, sensation seeking, awe, or spectacular death voyeurism (see Table 2).

4.2. Content Analysis of Photos Extracted from the Flickr Platform (User-Generated Content)

Then the author selected 44 photos from a sample of 6914 photos retrieved with Flickr’s API method, called flickr.photos.search. The selection of the photos was based on the content analysis of the photo, on the significant content of the title, tags, and text descriptions (see Table 4). The major criterion included every new portrayed cultural ecosystem service, thus aiming for maximum diversification of the CES inventory. The classification of CES was based on the classification taxonomy of marine and coastal CES provided by the Common International Classification of Ecosystem services (CICES) v5.1, as detailed in Section 2.1 in the literature review [37].
Using the classification proposed by Garcia Rodrigues et al. [38], the two most explicit cultural ecosystem services depicted in the photos (CES 1 and CES 2) were reported.
The majority of photos show recreational and leisure activities related with water and nautical sports, in particular, scenes of surfers riding giants waves in Praia do Norte, under the surveillance of the rescue teams. The second category of photos portray the Nazaré beach located on the south side of the cliffs during the summer holidays.
Furthermore, this content analysis identified the other types of CES: (1) aesthetical (e.g., landscape photography); (2) man-made immovable heritage (e.g., the museum, the Fort of Sao Miguel Arcanjo/lighthouse, the elevator of the XIX century or the religious buildings); (3) movable heritage (e.g., traditional fishing boats); (4) immaterial heritage (e.g., the local fish gastronomy or the women traditional costumes); (5) the inspiration for art and design (e.g., folklore and traditional dances); (6) local knowledge as a form of intellectual and representative interaction (e.g., drying fish techniques—see Figure 4, rescue water bikes driving tactics to ride the giant waves); (7) social relations depicted in the fishing activities, in the fish market, and other street shops.
Nazaré is a land of legends and tales, which are rich sources of CES related to the immaterial heritage and the inspiration for culture, art, and design. The origin of the name “Nazaré” itself is explained by a statue of the Virgin brought from Nazareth (in present-day Israel) in the 4th century, which was previously lost but was found centuries later. Another famous story says that the Virgin appeared to a local nobleman in 1182 who was hunting deer. He was about to fall off the edge of a cliff on his horse and was miraculously stopped just in time. This legend was the inspiration for the “Dear” Statue 11 (made by Agostinho Pires and Adália Alberto), which combined the legendary origins of Nazaré with giant-wave surfer characteristics. It stands tall on the road to the lighthouse and it has been captured in many tourists’ photos (see Figure 4).
In terms of scientific/educational cultural ecosystem services, besides the study of the biology of the flora and fauna of the region (under and out of the sea), giant-wave tourism has leveraged the scientific study related to the forecasts and measurements of the wave heights. The Hydrographic Institute of the Portuguese Navy 12 developed several projects that increased scientific knowledge about the Nazaré’s Canyon and the giant-wave formation.

4.3. Analysis of Spatial Distribution of CES Based on Geotagged Photos

In order to analyze the spatial distribution of the photos, Figure 5 presents a Google Earth map that was built with a kml file on the latitude and longitude coordinates uploaded by photographers. The first column of Table 4 corresponds with the legend code in Figure 5, thus allowing the identification of the dominant CES portrayed in the photo. Figure 6 are amplifications of the partial zones signaled in Figure 5: zone A, around the lighthouse fortress; zone B, in the town center.
The spatial distribution is influenced by the geographic and orographic characteristics of the territory, as the photos that depict recreational (R), and local knowledge (K) ecosystem services were taken in the best spot to watch the giant-wave—the cliffs around the lighthouse fortress, where the undersee canyon is located (see Figure 6). In the urban areas, such as Nazaré’s town center, the photos portray mostly CES related with heritage (H), aesthetical (A), and social relations (Sr). Therefore, the spatial distributions of CES are also influenced by the concentration of inhabitants as suggested by previous studies [36].
Another example of scientific CES, i.e., a direct consequence of the giant-wave boom, involves the innovation and development of a lot of products related with the safety of the surfers in Nazaré. Andrew Cotton describes a list of 14 items of his surf gear that includes, for example, an impact/float vest for paddling and tow surfing big waves. It has loads of foam on the chest but none on the stomach, which makes it really nice to paddle in; it also has foam side panels and back panels and two side zips with overhead entry, which makes it harder for it to be ripped off in violent wipeouts.

5. Conclusions: Theoretical and Managerial Implications

5.1. Theoretical Framework of a Giant-Wave Chaser’s Experience Journey

Based on previous sections of the literature review, this paper proposes a theoretical framework (see Figure 7) describing the push and pull factors that influence the tourist’s experience journey of the giant-wave spectator/chaser. Considering the chronological order from the left to the right, this study found that during the awareness stage the giant-wave tourist is exposed to several push factors, such as the Nazaré Municipality advertising campaigns, McNamara stories, or film documentaries. During the consideration and planning stages, the alerts of wave forecasts ignite the pull motivators, impelling the organization of the trip.
During the experience stage, the giant-wave tourist captures the benefits of all the CES provided by the landscape and this nature attraction, which in turn are moderated by the individual pull factors, such as the propensity to socialize or the sense of belonging to this “tribe” of giant-wave chasers. At the end of the journey, the tourist shares his/her “peak” moments and emotions on social media, thus promoting the electronic word-of-mouth among family, friends, and peers.

5.2. Managerial Implications

The phenomenon of giant waves in Nazaré leveraged the increase of tourism and the local economy and inspired the strategic shift in the positioning of Portugal’s destination branding. More recently, the website Visitportugal has launched an advertising campaign, i.e., “Portuguese waves”, promoting the country as a (winter) surf destination 13 and aiming to reduce the tourism seasonality [118,119].
This paper provides useful information for regional public decision-makers, destination marketing organizations, tourism operators, and business entrepreneurs. The geotagged social media photos allowed the researcher to assess the most relevant maritime/coastal cultural ecosystem services in Nazaré, Portugal. Tourism operators and business entrepreneurs can use this mapping tool to support their business location decisions.
For example, risk recreationists (non-big-wave surfers) is a new market niche that is starting to be explored by new businesses (e.g., boat cruises that allow tourists to have closer views of big waves 14).
From a theoretical perspective, this study did not confirm some of the pull factors suggested by previous studies. The comments from the user-generated photos and videos did not provide explicit evidence that giant-wave chasers are conscious of the motivations related to risk recreation and imminent/spectacular death voyeurism. Further research should adopt other methodologies, such as depth interviews in order to capture those unconscious drivers and deeper motivations.
Public decision-makers, destination marketing organizations, tourism operators, and business entrepreneurs must acknowledge the relevance of journey mapping in order to identify the moments of stress and the touchpoints associated with peak/positive experiences generated by these CES. These hotpots also provide the information about tourists’ most frequent journeys, which can feed the design of innovative coastal tourism experiences. Multi-thematic coastal tourism routes or trails may contribute to attract new visitors, to enrich their journeys, to increase the staying time and satisfaction and, ultimately, promote electronic word-of-mouth. Further research may estimate the demand and assess the economic impact of surf tourism for the region.
There a lot of events (such as the Tudor Nazaré Tow Surfing Challenge) that attract more tourists every year. Nevertheless, according to Wieser [2], Bradshaw [7], or Muller [120], crowding and exceeding the carrying capacity may threaten the social and environmental sustainability of surf tourism in Nazaré and in other surf spots in Western Europe.

Funding

This research was funded by the Multiannual Funding of the Landscape, Heritage, and Territory Laboratory (Lab2PT), reference UID/04509/2020, financed by national funds (PIDDAC) through the FCT/MCTES (Fundação para Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal).

Data Availability Statement

Data is available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Notes

1
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2011/nov/13/garrett-mcnamara-surfing-record-wave, accessed on 31 October 2022.
2
Official trailer of HBO documentary: https://youtu.be/znCNT-9k_Ws, accessed on 31 October 2022.
3
(e.g., the front cover of the newspaper “The Times” of 30th January of 2013).
4
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/11/world/europe/nazare-portugal-surfing-big-waves.html; https://www.theguardian.com/travel/2022/nov/04/nazare-portugal-watching-surfers-ride-monster-waves, accessed on 31 October 2022.
5
Source: https://www.facebook.com/praiadonortenazare/posts/10160210246034993, accessed on 31 October 2022.
6
https://vimeo.com/575472527/3476555f3a, accessed on 31 October 2022.
7
https://www.surf-forecast.com/weather_maps/North-Atlantic?over=none&type=htsgw; https://pt.surf-forecast.com/; https://www.ipma.pt/pt/maritima/hs/, accessed on 31 October 2022.
8
https://beachcam.meo.pt/en/livecams/praia-do-norte-canhao-nazare/, accessed on 31 October 2022.
9
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1333419030760250, accessed on 31 October 2022.
10
https://www.facebook.com/praiadonortenazare/posts/10160210246034993, accessed on 31 October 2022.
11
https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/veado, accessed on 31 October 2022.
12
https://www.hidrografico.pt/index/en, accessed on 31 October 2022.
13
https://ie.linkedin.com/posts/visitportugal_portuguese-waves-activity-6990634210155741184-KYGF?trk=public_profile_like_view, accessed on 31 October 2022.
14
https://www.facebook.com/nazarewaterfun, accessed on 31 October 2022.

References

  1. Teixeira, D.D. Quebras Estruturais na Procura Turística: O Caso das Ondas Gigantes da Nazaré. Master’s Thesis, Faculty of Economics of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wieser, N.K. Causes and Development Impacts of the Tourism Boom Exemplified by Nazaré. Ph.D. Dissertation, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Graz, Austria, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cunha, P.P.; Gouveia, M.P. The Nazaré Coast, the Submarine Canyon and the Giant Waves: A Synthesis; Working Paper; University of Coimbra: Coimbra, Portugal, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  4. Do Carmo, J.S.A. Dominant processes that amplify the swell towards the coast: The Nazaré Canyon and the giant waves. Res. Soc. Dev. 2022, 11, e578111133804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hydrographic Institute. Ondas na Nazaré, Como se Forma. Available online: https://www.hidrografico.pt/info/3 (accessed on 9 November 2022).
  6. Langemeyer, J.; Calcagni, F.; Baró, F. Mapping the intangible: Using geolocated social media data to examine landscape aesthetics. Land Use Policy 2018, 77, 542–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bradshaw, L. Surfing the Innovation Waves: Surf Tourism in Portugal. In Tourism Innovation in Spain and Portugal; Leitão, J., Ratten, V., Braga, V., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 149–166. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cunha-e-Sá, M.A.; Freitas, R.; Nunes, L.C.; Otrachshenko, V. On nature’s shoulders: Riding the big waves in Nazaré. Tour. Econ. 2018, 24, 369–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Becker, L.; Jaakkola, E. Customer experience: Fundamental premises and implications for research. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2020, 48, 630–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bueno, E.V.; Weber, T.; Bomfim, E.; Kato, H. Measuring customer experience in service: A systematic review. Serv. Ind. J. 2019, 39, 779–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Følstad, A.; Kvale, K. Customer journeys: A systematic literature review. J. Serv. Theory Pract. 2018, 28, 196–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Jain, R.; Aagja, J.; Bagdare, S. Customer experience—A review and research agenda. J. Serv. Theory Pract. 2017, 27, 642–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chang, S. Experience economy in hospitality and tourism: Gain and loss values for service and experience. Tour. Manag. 2018, 64, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hu, L.; Olivieri, M. Social media management in the traveller’s customer journey: An analysis of the hospitality sector. Curr. Issues Tour. 2021, 24, 1768–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Taheri, B.; Prayag, G.; Muskat, B. Introduction to the special issue: Consumer experience management and customer journeys in tourism, hospitality and events. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2021, 40, 100877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, T. Co-creating tourism experiences through a traveler’s journey: A perspective article. Tour. Rev. 2019, 75, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lemon, K.N.; Verhoef, P.C. Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. J. Mark. 2016, 80, 69–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bolton, R.; McColl-Kennedy, J.; Cheung, L.; Gallan, A.; Orsingher, C.; Witell, L.; Zaki, M. Customer experience challenges: Bringing together digital, physical and social realms. J. Serv. Manag. 2018, 29, 776–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Caro, C.; Cunha, P.P.; Marques, J.C.; Teixeira, Z. Identifying ecosystem services research hotspots to illustrate the importance of site-specific research: An Atlantic coastal region case study. Environ. Sustain. Indic. 2020, 6, 100031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Culhane, F.E.; Robinson, L.A.; Lillebø, A.I. Approaches for estimating the supply of ecosystem services: Concepts for ecosystem-based management in coastal and marine environments. In Ecosystem-Based Management, Ecosystem Services and Aquatic Biodiversity: Theory, Tools and Applications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 105–126. [Google Scholar]
  21. Da Silva, C.V.; Ortigão, M.; Willaert, T.; Rosa, R.; Nunes, L.C.; Cunha-e-Sá, M.A. Participatory Geographic Information Systems (PGIS): Alternative approaches to identify potential conflicts and positional accuracy in marine and coastal ecosystem services. Mar. Policy 2021, 131, 104650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Azevedo, A.; Duenas, M.P.M.; Costas, G.B. Innovation on Research Methods: Geotagged Photos as a Proxy Tool to Map Heritage and Cultural Ecosystem Services Hotspots. In Tourism Innovation in Spain and Portugal; Leitão, J., Ratten, V., Braga, V., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 63–88. [Google Scholar]
  23. Clemente, P.; Calvache, M.; Antunes, P.; Santos, R.; Cerdeira, J.O.; Martins, M.J. Combining social media photographs and species distribution models to map cultural ecosystem services: The case of a Natural Park in Portugal. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 96, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cunha, J.; Elliott, M.; Ramos, S. Linking modelling and empirical data to assess recreation services provided by coastal habitats: The case of NW Portugal. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2018, 162, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ghermandi, A.; Camacho-Valdez, V.; Trejo-Espinosa, H. Social media-based analysis of cultural ecosystem services and heritage tourism in a coastal region of Mexico. Tour. Manag. 2020, 77, 104002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gosal, A.S.; Geijzendorffer, I.R.; Václavík, T.; Poulin, B.; Ziv, G. Using social media, machine learning and natural language processing to map multiple recreational beneficiaries. Ecosyst. Serv. 2019, 38, 100958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Oteros-Rozas, E.; Martín-López, B.; Fagerholm, N.; Bieling, C.; Plieninger, T. Using social media photos to explore the relation between cultural ecosystem services and landscape features across five European sites. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 94, 74–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Richards, D.R.; Friess, D.A. A rapid indicator of cultural ecosystem service usage at a fine spatial scale: Content analysis of social media photographs. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 53, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Richards, D.R.; Tunçer, B. Using image recognition to automate assessment of cultural ecosystem services from social media photographs. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 31, 318–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Callau, A.À.; Albert, M.Y.P.; Rota, J.J.; Giné, D.S. Landscape characterization using photographs from crowdsourced platforms: Content analysis of social media photographs. Open Geosci. 2019, 11, 558–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Eigenbrod, F.; Armsworth, P.R.; Anderson, B.J.; Heinemeyer, A.; Gillings, S.; Roy, D.B.; Thomas, C.D.; Gaston, K.J. The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. J. Appl. Ecol. 2010, 47, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gould, R.K.; Morse, J.W.; Adams, A.B. Cultural ecosystem services and decision-making: How researchers describe the applications of their work. People Nat. 2019, 1, 457–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Hermes, J.; Van Berkel, D.; Burkhard, B.; Plieninger, T.; Fagerholm, N.; von Haaren, C.; Albert, C. Assessment and valuation of recreational ecosystem services of landscapes. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 31, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Retka, J.; Jepson, P.; Ladle, R.J.; Malhado, A.C.; Vieira, F.A.; Normande, I.C.; Souza, C.N.; Bragagnolo, C.; Correia, R.A. Assessing cultural ecosystem services of a large marine protected area through social media photographs. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2019, 176, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ruskule, A.; Klepers, A.; Veidemane, K. Mapping and assessment of cultural ecosystem services of Latvian coastal areas. One Ecosyst. 2018, 3, e25499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tieskens, K.F.; Van Zanten, B.T.; Schulp, C.J.; Verburg, P.H. Aesthetic appreciation of the cultural landscape through social media: An analysis of revealed preference in the Dutch river landscape. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2018, 177, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Haines-Young, R.; Potschin-Young, M. Revision of the common international classification for ecosystem services (CICES V5. 1): A policy brief. One Ecosyst. 2018, 3, e27108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Garcia Rodrigues, J.; Conides, A.; Rivero Rodriguez, S.; Raicevich, S.; Pita, P.; Kleisner, K.; Pita, C.; Lopes, P.; Alonso Roldán, V.; Ramos, S.; et al. Marine and Coastal Cultural Ecosystem Services: Knowledge gaps and research priorities. One Ecosyst. 2017, 2, e12290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Carvache-Franco, W.; Carvache-Franco, M.; Carvache-Franco, O.; Hernández-Lara, A.B. Segmentation of foreign tourist demand in a coastal marine destination: The case of Montañita, Ecuador. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2019, 167, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Carvache-Franco, W.; Carvache-Franco, M.; Carvache-Franco, O.; Hernández-Lara, A.B. Motivation and segmentation of the demand for coastal and marine destinations. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2020, 34, 100661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nagy, K.Z.; Tóth, K.; Gyömbér, N.; Tóth, L.; Bánhidi, M. Motives underlying water sport tourist behaviour: A segmentation approach. World Leis. J. 2021, 63, 109–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fluker, M. Riding the wave: Defining surf tourism. In Proceedings of the 13th International Research Conference of the Council for Australian University Tourism and Hospitality Education (CAUTHE), Coffs Harbour, Australia, 5–8 February 2003. [Google Scholar]
  43. Elmahdy, Y.M.; Orams, M.B.; Mykletun, R.J. Exploring the Travel Behavior and Experiences of Norwegian Surfers: Cold-Versus Warm-Water Surfing. Tour. Mar. Environ. 2021, 16, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Boudreau, P.; Mackenzie, S.H.; Hodge, K. Flow states in adventure recreation: A systematic review and thematic synthesis. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2020, 46, 101611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Houge Mackenzie, S.; Brymer, E. Conceptualizing adventurous nature sport: A positive psychology perspective. Ann. Leis. Res. 2020, 23, 79–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Schmitt, A.; Bohuon, A. When women surf the world’s biggest waves: Breaking gender barriers. Sport Soc. 2022, 25, 1924–1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gstaettner, A.M.; Lee, D.; Rodger, K. The concept of risk in nature-based tourism and recreation—A systematic literature review. Curr. Issues Tour. 2018, 21, 1784–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kerr, J.H.; Houge Mackenzie, S. Multiple motives for participating in adventure sports. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2012, 13, 649–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pomfret, G.; Bramwell, B. The characteristics and motivational decisions of outdoor adventure tourists: A review and analysis. Curr. Issues Tour. 2014, 19, 1447–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Wiersma, L.D. A phenomenological investigation of the psychology of big-wave surfing at Maverick’s. Sport Psychol. 2014, 28, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Giddy, J.K.; Webb, N.L. The influence of the environment on adventure tourism: From motivations to experiences. Curr. Issues Tour. 2018, 21, 2124–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Buckley, R. Is adventure tourism therapeutic? Tour. Recreat. Res. 2021, 46, 553–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ewert, A.; Zwart, R.; Davidson, C. Underlying motives for selected adventure recreation activities: The case for eudaimonics and hedonics. Behav. Sci. 2020, 10, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Brymer, E.; Schweitzer, R. The search for freedom in extreme sports: A phenomenological exploration. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2013, 14, 865–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Buckley, R.C. Rush as a key motivation in skilled adventure tourism: Resolving the risk recreation paradox. Tour. Manag. 2012, 33, 961–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Vidon, E.S.; Rickly, J.M.; Knudsen, D.C. Wilderness state of mind: Expanding authenticity. Ann. Tour. Res. 2018, 73, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Delle Fave, A.; Bassi, M.; Massimini, F. Quality of experience and risk perception in high-altitude rock climbing. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 2003, 15, 82–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Morgan, J.D.; Coutts, R.A. Measuring peak experience in recreational surfing. J. Sport Behav. 2016, 39, 202–217. [Google Scholar]
  59. Swann, C.; Piggott, D.; Schweickle, M.; Vella, S.A. A review of scientific progress in flow in sport and exercise: Normal science, crisis, and a progressive shift. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 2018, 30, 249–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Martin, P.; Priest, S. Understanding the adventure experience. J. Adventure Educ. 1986, 3, 18–21. [Google Scholar]
  61. Jones, C.D.; Hollenhorst, S.J.; Perna, F. An empirical comparison of the four-channel flow model and adventure experience paradigm. Leis. Sci. 2003, 25, 17–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Csikszentmihalyi, M. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: The Experience of Play in Work and Games; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  63. Cheng, T.M.; Lu, C.C. The causal relationships among recreational involvement, flow experience, and well-being for surfing activities. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2015, 20, 1486–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Nerothin, P.H. A Phenomenological Investigation of Lifestyle Surfers from San Diego; Prescott College: Prescott, AZ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  65. Partington, S.; Partington, E.; Olivier, S. The dark side of flow: A qualitative study of dependence in big wave surfing. Sport Psychol. 2009, 23, 170–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Clough, P.; Mackenzie, S.H.; Mallabon, L.; Brymer, E. Adventurous physical activity environments: A mainstream intervention for mental health. Sport. Med. 2016, 46, 963–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Buckley, R. Nature sports, health and ageing: The value of euphoria. Ann. Leis. Res. 2018, 23, 92–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Magyaródi, T.; Nagy, H.; Soltész, P.; Mózes, T.; Oláh, A. Psychometric properties of a newly established flow state questionnaire. J. Happiness Well Being 2013, 1, 89–100. [Google Scholar]
  69. Houge Mackenzie, S.; Kerr, J.H. A (mis)guided adventure tourism experience: An autoethnographic analysis of mountaineering in Bolivia. J. Sport Tour. 2012, 17, 125–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fletcher, R. The emperor’s new adventure: Public secrecy and the paradox of adventure tourism. J. Contemp. Ethnogr. 2010, 39, 6–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Urry, J. The Tourist Gaze, 1st ed.; Sage: London, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  72. Gibson, H.J. Sport tourism: A critical analysis of research. Sport Manag. Rev. 1998, 1, 45–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hallmann, K.; Zehrer, A.; Rietz, J. Sport events as experiencescapes: The spectator’s perspective. Int. J. Sport. Mark. Spons. 2021, 22, 764–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Horbel, C.; Popp, B.; Woratschek, H.; Wilson, B. How context shapes value co-creation: Spectator experience of sport events. Serv. Ind. J. 2016, 36, 510–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bitner, M.J. Servicescapes: The impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. J. Mark. 1992, 56, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lee, S.; Lee, H.J.; Seo, W.J.; Green, C. A new approach to stadium experience: The dynamics of the sensoryscape, social interaction, and sense of home. J. Sport Manag. 2012, 26, 490–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kaplanidou, K.; Vogt, C. The meaning and measurement of a sport event experience among active sport tourists. J. Sport Manag. 2010, 24, 544–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Kruger, M.; Saayman, M. Creating a memorable spectator experience at the two oceans marathon. J. Sport Tour. 2012, 17, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wang, J.; Liu-Lastres, B.; Ritchie, B.W.; Pan, D.Z. Risk reduction and adventure tourism safety: An extension of the risk perception attitude framework (RPAF). Tour. Manag. 2019, 74, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Li, Y.; Pan, D.-Z.; Chanson, H.; Pan, C.-H. Tidal bore progressing on a small slope. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2017, 88, 513–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Diehm, R.; Armatas, C. Surfing: An avenue for socially acceptable risk-taking, satisfying needs for sensation seeking and experience seeking. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2004, 36, 663–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Harmston, R.G. Exploratory Investigaton of the Inspirations and Motivations in the Sport of Big Wave Surfing; California State University: Fullerton, CA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  83. Zuckerman, M. Behavioral Expressions and Biosocial Bases of Sensation Seeking; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  84. Ivanova, P.; Light, D. ‘It’s not that we like death or anything’: Exploring the motivations and experiences of visitors to a lighter dark tourism attraction. J. Herit. Tour. 2018, 13, 356–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Stone, P.R. Dark tourism as ‘mortality capital: The case of Ground Zero and the Significant Other Dead. In Contemporary Tourist Experience: Concepts and Consequences; Sharpley, R., Stone, P.R., Eds.; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2012; pp. 71–94. [Google Scholar]
  86. Light, D.; Ivanova, P. Thanatopsis and mortality mediation within “lightest” dark tourism. Tour. Rev. 2021, 77, 622–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Buda, D.M. The death drive in tourism studies. Ann. Tour. Res. 2015, 50, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Buda, D.M.; McIntosh, A.J. Dark tourism and voyeurism: Tourist arrested for ‘spying’ in Iran. Int. J. Cult. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2013, 7, 214–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Buda, D.M.; Shim, D. Desiring the dark: ‘A taste for the unusual’ in North Korean tourism? Curr. Issues Tour. 2015, 18, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Martini, A.; Buda, D.-M. Dark tourism and affect: Framing places of death and disaster. Curr. Issues Tour. 2018; Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Stone, P. Dark Tourism as ‘Spectacular Death’: Towards a new era of showcasing death in the early 21st century. Curr. Issues Dark Tour. Res. 2017, 1. Available online: https://www.dark-tourism.org.uk/product-page/dark-tourism-as-spectacular-death (accessed on 31 October 2022).
  92. Gordillo, F.; Mestas, L.; Arana, J.M.; Perez, M.A.; Escotto, E.A. The effect of mortality salience and type of life on personality evaluation. Eur. J. Psychol. 2017, 13, 286–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Oren, G.; Shani, A.; Poria, Y. Mortality salience—Shedding light on the dark experience. J. Herit. Tour. 2019, 14, 574–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Prayag, G.; Buda, D.-M.; Jordan, E.J. Mortality salience and meaning in life for residents visiting dark tourism sites. J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 29, 1508–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Biran, A.; Buda, D.M. Fear of death motives in dark tourism. In The Palgrave Handbook of Dark Tourism Studies; Stone, P.R., Hartmann, R., Seaton, T., Sharpley, R., White, L., Eds.; Palgrave: Basingstoke, UK, 2018; pp. 515–532. [Google Scholar]
  96. Xu, S.; Barbieri, C.; Stanis, S.W.; Market, P.S. Sensation-seeking attributes associated with storm-chasing tourists: Implications for future engagement. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2012, 14, 269–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wilhelm Stanis, S.A.; Barbieri, C. Niche tourism attributes scale: A case of storm chasing. Curr. Issues Tour. 2013, 16, 495–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Boulais, C.M. When severe weather becomes a tourist attraction: Understanding the relationship with nature in storm-chasing tourism. Weather Clim. Soc. 2017, 9, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Keltner, D.; Haidt, J. Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cogn. Emot. 2003, 17, 297–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Lu, D.; Liu, Y.; Lai, I.; Yang, L. Awe: An important emotional experience in sustainable tourism. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Pearce, J.; Strickland-Munro, J.; Moore, S.A. What fosters awe-inspiring experiences in nature-based tourism destinations? J. Sustain. Tour. 2017, 25, 362–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Bonner, E.T.; Friedman, H.L. A conceptual clarification of the experience of awe: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Humanist. Psychol. 2011, 39, 222–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Schneider, K. Awakening to Awe: Personal Stories of Profound Transformation; Jason Aronson: Lanham, MD, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  104. Reis, P.; Caldeira, A.; Carneiro, M.J. Can surf culture foster loyalty towards surf destinations? J. Sport Tour. 2022, 26, 387–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ferreira, F.F. A Onda da Transformação. Surf, Turismo e Tradição na Nazaré. Master’s Dissertation, NOVA FCSH, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  106. Ponting, J.; O’Brien, D. Regulating ‘Nirvana’: Sustainable surf tourism in a climate of increasing regulation. Sport Manag. Rev. 2015, 18, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Iliev, D. Consumption, motivation and experience in dark tourism: A conceptual and critical analysis. Tour. Geogr. 2021, 23, 963–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Quico, C. Nazaré criativa: How can creative tourism initiatives contribute towards sustainable tourism? In Creative Tourism Dynamics: Connecting Travellers, Communities, Cultures and Places; Cabeça, S., Gonçalves, A., Marques, J., Tavares, M., Eds.; Grácio Editor: Coimbra, Portugal, 2020; pp. 133–160. [Google Scholar]
  109. Carapuço, M.M.; Taborda, R.; Andrade, C. Triggers in science communication: “The Nazaré Wave: A trigger for learning”. Cont. Shelf Res. 2022, 244, 104805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Jorgensen, D.L. Participant Observation. In Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences; Scott, R.A., Kosslyn, S.M., Eds.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kim, H.; Stepchenkova, S. Effect of tourist photographs on attitudes towards destination: Manifest and latent content. Tour. Manag. 2015, 49, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Matteucci, X. Photo elicitation: Exploring tourist experiences with researcher-found images. Tour. Manag. 2013, 35, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Prosser, J.; Loxley, A.; Introducing Visual Methods. National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper. Available online: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/420/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-010.pdf (accessed on 3 July 2020).
  114. Pung, J.; Yung, R.; Khoo-Lattimore, C.; Chiappa, G. Transformative travel experiences and gender: A double duoethnography approach. Curr. Issues Tour. 2020, 23, 538–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Sofield, T.H.; Marafa, L.M. Revitalizing fieldtrips in tourism: Visual anthropology, photo elicitation, rapid appraisal, participant observation and Habermas. Tour. Manag. 2019, 75, 522–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Mach, L.; Ponting, J.; Brown, J.; Savage, J. Riding waves of intra-seasonal demand in surf tourism: Analysing the nexus of seasonality and 21st century surf forecasting technology. Ann. Leis. Res. 2020, 23, 184–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Real Watersports INC. Surgical Strike: Diaries of a Professional Recreational Surfer. Available online: http://www.realwatersports.com/news/surgical-strike-puerto-rico/ (accessed on 18 November 2022).
  118. Lau, J.D.; Hicks, C.C.; Gurney, G.G.; Cinner, J.E. What matters to whom and why? Understanding the importance of coastal ecosystem services in developing coastal communities. Ecosyst. Serv. 2019, 35, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Vieira, I.I. O Desenvolvimento da Nazaré Através do Marketing Territorial e do Branding. Ph.D. Dissertation, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  120. Müller, S. The Future Development of Surf Tourism in Coastal Destinations in Western Europe: Analysis of the Potential Development of Surf Tourism in Western Europe and How It Can Set a Benchmark for Sustainable Adventure Tourism. Bachelor’s Thesis, LAB University of Applied Sciences, Lahti, Finland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
Land 12 00360 g002 550
Figure 2. Print screen of the wave height forecast published on the website pt-surf-forecast.com.
Figure 2. Print screen of the wave height forecast published on the website pt-surf-forecast.com.
Land 12 00360 g002
Land 12 00360 g003 550
Figure 3. Authors’ photos taken on the ethnographic trip showing the spectators of giant waves.
Figure 3. Authors’ photos taken on the ethnographic trip showing the spectators of giant waves.
Land 12 00360 g003
Land 12 00360 g004 550
Figure 4. Author’s photos taken on the ethnographic trip showing some examples of cultural ecosystem services of heritage and inspiration for art.
Figure 4. Author’s photos taken on the ethnographic trip showing some examples of cultural ecosystem services of heritage and inspiration for art.
Land 12 00360 g004
Land 12 00360 g005 550
Figure 5. Google Earth map of the spatial distribution of the photos.
Figure 5. Google Earth map of the spatial distribution of the photos.
Land 12 00360 g005
Land 12 00360 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Amplification of Google Earth map Zone A (around the Fortress); (b) amplification of Google Earth map Zone B (Nazaré town center).
Figure 6. (a) Amplification of Google Earth map Zone A (around the Fortress); (b) amplification of Google Earth map Zone B (Nazaré town center).
Land 12 00360 g006
Land 12 00360 g007 550
Figure 7. Theoretical framework of a tourist’s experience journey of the giant-wave spectator/chaser.
Figure 7. Theoretical framework of a tourist’s experience journey of the giant-wave spectator/chaser.
Land 12 00360 g007
Table
Table 1. Comparative evolution of the number of hotel guests, according to their home countries: in 2010 (before Garret McNamara’s first famous giant wave ride) and 2019 (the last available data without the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic).
Table 1. Comparative evolution of the number of hotel guests, according to their home countries: in 2010 (before Garret McNamara’s first famous giant wave ride) and 2019 (the last available data without the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic).
Portugal (2010)Portugal (2019)Oeste (2010)Oeste (2019)Nazaré (2010)Nazaré (2019)Variation 2010–2019(%)
Total13,537,04025,249,904286,305650,91744,931132,466295%
Portugal6,705,4609,941,747199,516361,35127,38958,115212%
UE27/UE2812,112,68210,602,067266,678194,08139,93448,466121%
Germany728,7841,602,066746925,85310316630643%
Spain1,375,8422,069,64521,06652,749466711,797253%
France574,8281,641,91212,15640,404295113,271450%
Italy365,368 6549 1159
The Netherlands351,635 2905 351
UK1,111,1972,042,867532212,2279911156117%
Africa 195,954 1258 237
USA/America266,2482,648,454364755,03874112,4691683%
Asia 993,201 20,887 7899
Oceania 173,699 3309 1000
Source: Statistics Portugal.
Table
Table 2. Giant-wave surf tourism segments: characteristics, push and pull drivers, and cultural ecosystem services.
Table 2. Giant-wave surf tourism segments: characteristics, push and pull drivers, and cultural ecosystem services.
(Active) Giant-Wave
Surfers		Surf Tourists (Non-Big-Wave Surfers)Risk Recreationists(Passive) Giant-Wave
Chasers/Spectators
Major characteristics(Professional) surfers and their rescue teams who are specialized in giant-wave ridingActive participation in surf sport activities in non-big-wave swellTourists who participate in risk activities, such as riding giant waves in boats or water bikes with driverSpectators who enjoy watching surfers and/or giant waves
Push factors (internal motivators)Extreme risk recreation
thrill, risk, flow, physical challenge, skills development, overcoming nature and fear, euphoria,
seeking for adrenalin, imminent death risk		Sense of belonging to the surf lifestyle/community, connection with nature, socialization, identity constructionRisk/adventure recreation
hedonic, eudaemonic and therapeutic aspects of subjective well-being (SWB) ‘peak’, ‘transcendent’, or ‘cathartic’ experiences		Connection with nature, sensation seeking, gaze, spectacular death voyeurism, thanatopsis,
storm chasing, and awe-inspiring experiences
Pull factors (external motivators)Organized events and advertising campaignsOrganized events and advertising campaigns
Films and documentaries
Nazaré ambassadors (e.g., Garret MacNamara)		Tourism operators who provide risk recreation experiencesGiant-wave forecasting/alerts
Advertising campaigns
Films and documentaries
Cultural Ecosystem ServicesRecreational
Sense of place
Social Relations
Scientific		Recreational
Social Relations
Sense of place
Educational		RecreationalRecreational, aesthetic, spiritual, sacred and/or religious
Social relations
Sense of place
Source: Author’s elaboration.
Table
Table 3. Examples of the videos posted on YouTube less than 24 h after (accessed on 26 February 2022).
Table 3. Examples of the videos posted on YouTube less than 24 h after (accessed on 26 February 2022).
24 h after Views24 h after Comments
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFvtuZe_yG024700
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHxG5cGrwtc12810
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8VfVs9D2lY2086324
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRls6pTIpKI23884
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLFZ0QSMM6M12446
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nGbRrVw8sA19
Table
Table 4. Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES1 and CES2) depicted in the selection of photos retrieved by the Flickr API method flickr.photos.search (all accessed on 31st October 2022).
Table 4. Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES1 and CES2) depicted in the selection of photos retrieved by the Flickr API method flickr.photos.search (all accessed on 31st October 2022).
LegendPhoto IDDate TakenViewsurl_oDescriptionCES 1CES 2
A1306445426802016-09-15 19:29:2067https://live.staticflickr.com/5490/30644542680_e7c0420bb6_o.jpgBeach at sunsetAestheticalPhotography
A2305591570362016-10-12 13:08:031571https://live.staticflickr.com/5767/30559157036_05891a1a45_o.jpgWindows architectureAestheticalImmaterial heritage
A3493093069772018-06-09 21:23:43556https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/49309306977_e8220593fe_o.jpgFisherman at the beachAestheticalSocial relations
H1234427993142015-09-29 12:03:3252https://live.staticflickr.com/5749/23442799314_33cd5fb436_o.jpgMuseumHeritage
H2354999088752016-05-08 18:03:471444https://live.staticflickr.com/4254/35499908875_11e5de01a1_o.jpgTraditional fishing boatsHeritageSense of Place
H3273240031212016-05-10 20:27:112634https://live.staticflickr.com/7418/27324003121_4867c51b2b_o.jpgOld traditional boatsHeritagePhotography
H4310964292602016-06-17 14:28:321459https://live.staticflickr.com/5556/31096429260_aee2133724_o.jpgLighthouseHeritage
H5304645279352016-10-10 16:29:50800https://live.staticflickr.com/5333/30464527935_7d079741ec_o.jpgNazaré, PortugalHeritageReligious
H6358677887752017-06-15 13:52:01609https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/35867788775_2c24644592_o.jpgOld ChapelHeritageReligious
H7404433971742018-03-28 09:11:3227,568https://live.staticflickr.com/789/40443397174_b217c32347_o.jpgOld traditional boatsHeritagePhotography
H8452752721742018-11-16 15:08:2169https://live.staticflickr.com/4825/45275272174_f66ffdb179_o.jpgNazaréHeritage
H9518538490212021-07-08 14:41:21120https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51853849021_d1cde46804_o.jpgThe XIX century elevatorHeritageIndustrial tourism
H10513857151252021-07-08 19:12:48232https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51385715125_1f7dd7d9fa_o.jpgFort of Sao Miguel Arcanjo and LighthouseHeritageSense of Place
H11517086462082021-11-23 17:57:57188https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51708646208_70179d3964_o.jpgPraia do Norte and Forte de Sao Miguel ArcanjoHeritagePhotography
H12517110916742021-11-26 14:02:0040https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51711091674_3bd7abdc3e_o.jpgTraditional Gastronomy (Octopus, Squid and Cod)Heritage
H13520654387552022-05-10 17:42:17371https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52065438755_c255ec11c2_o.jpgTraditional women costumeHeritageSocial relations
H14520654387552022-05-10 17:42:17371https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52065438755_c255ec11c2_o.jpgLocal woman with traditional costumeHeritageSocial relations
I1515177463862016-05-10 21:44:401907https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51517746386_893630dfa4_o.jpgTraditional folklore dancersInspiration for artImmaterial heritage
I2515452915352016-05-10 21:45:453406https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51545291535_165ab27249_o.jpgFolklore, traditional dancerInspiration for artImmaterial heritage
I3331728106312016-05-10 22:09:452580https://live.staticflickr.com/686/33172810631_070d5bf8bc_o.jpgFolklore, traditional dancesInspiration for artImmaterial heritage
I4513545069062021-07-08 19:01:27270https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51354506906_57fc33932a_o.jpgThe Dear Statue (Religious Tales and Legends)Inspiration for artImmaterial heritage
IR318217858832015-09-26 15:57:17316https://live.staticflickr.com/562/31821785883_ac60b142d9_o.jpgDry fishIntellectual InteractionsImmaterial heritage
K1523033084752019-11-05 18:07:137588https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52303308475_6aeebfcdf1_o.jpgRescue water bikesLocal knowledgeIntellectual Interactions
K2519705789662022-03-30 01:10:379537https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51970578966_1440ef6c84_o.jpgRescue water bikesLocal knowledgeIntellectual Interactions
R1331043971522017-02-21 10:16:502093https://live.staticflickr.com/593/33104397152_ccb4fe5c4c_o.jpgSurfRecreational
R2323963441542017-02-23 11:47:541231https://live.staticflickr.com/3699/32396344154_a8aab87912_o.jpgSurf MuseumRecreationalIntellectual Interactions
R3349320977642017-06-12 13:25:521263https://live.staticflickr.com/4023/34932097764_18fde34226_o.jpgNazaré BeachRecreational
R4495982547062018-02-10 11:30:2982https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/49598254706_8577f26e55_o.jpgGiant-wave watchingRecreationalSense of Place
R5518528519522021-07-08 15:42:18154https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51852851952_686aac1472_o.jpgBeachRecreational
R6519163543562021-10-22 17:08:46146https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51916354356_455accacfb_o.jpgSurf MuseumRecreationalIntellectual Interactions
R7522340452492022-07-22 17:49:431595https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52234045249_f50abfd0b8_o.jpgNautical/Water SportsRecreational
Sc1517222960372021-07-28 16:59:49167https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51722296037_b2281a64df_o.jpgLocal flora at the dunesScientificEducational
Sc2522289357532022-07-18 11:28:319https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52228935753_6f328a25d3_o.jpgLocal floraScientificEducational
P1188251140282015-05-19 21:38:12373https://live.staticflickr.com/288/18825114028_c751c0947e_o.jpgNazaré´s housesSense of Place
Sr1242599592602012-11-01 17:00:39114https://live.staticflickr.com/1469/24259959260_e6ac23bcdc_o.jpgLocal saleswomanSocial relationsSense of Place
Sr2238851643292015-09-29 13:53:30237https://live.staticflickr.com/1699/23885164329_96738aab3a_o.jpgSquare in SitioSocial relationsSense of Place
Sr3225032531292015-11-07 15:31:1611https://live.staticflickr.com/633/22503253129_571316c7a1_o.jpgLocal drink (“Ginja”)Social relationsHeritage
Sr4317494448172016-05-08 18:05:002353https://live.staticflickr.com/4864/31749444817_7f440568d2_o.jpgLocal womenSocial relations
Sr5281747329622016-05-08 18:05:209220https://live.staticflickr.com/7006/28174732962_f9841522ac_o.jpgDrying fish on the beachSocial relationsIntellectual Interactions
Sr6305397079362016-10-12 12:14:27811https://live.staticflickr.com/5543/30539707936_fa6c790d44_o.jpgFish MarketSocial relations
Sr7492031255212019-12-05 18:02:481150https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/49203125521_fb62d6ea16_o.jpgFishing BoatSocial relationsSense of Place
Sr8522294107052022-07-18 11:50:409https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52229410705_da1640f416_o.jpgFishing BoatSocial relations
Sr9524504037062022-07-23 18:11:214https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52450403706_9c1b141d35_o.jpgSelling dry fishSocial relations
Sp520677344302022-02-14 05:28:32215https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52067734430_8f0da3689c_o.jpgReligious Tales and LegendsSpiritualImmaterial heritage
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Azevedo, A. Pull and Push Drivers of Giant-Wave Spectators in Nazaré, Portugal: A Cultural Ecosystem Services Assessment Based on Geo-Tagged Photos. Land 2023, 12, 360. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020360

AMA Style

Azevedo A. Pull and Push Drivers of Giant-Wave Spectators in Nazaré, Portugal: A Cultural Ecosystem Services Assessment Based on Geo-Tagged Photos. Land. 2023; 12(2):360. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020360

Chicago/Turabian Style

Azevedo, António. 2023. "Pull and Push Drivers of Giant-Wave Spectators in Nazaré, Portugal: A Cultural Ecosystem Services Assessment Based on Geo-Tagged Photos" Land 12, no. 2: 360. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020360

APA Style

Azevedo, A. (2023). Pull and Push Drivers of Giant-Wave Spectators in Nazaré, Portugal: A Cultural Ecosystem Services Assessment Based on Geo-Tagged Photos. Land, 12(2), 360. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020360

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop