Next Article in Journal
Ultrasonic Activated Biochar and Its Removal of Harmful Substances in Environment
Next Article in Special Issue
A Plasmid Carrying blaIMP-56 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Belonging to a Novel Resistance Plasmid Family
Previous Article in Journal
Bioactive Antimicrobial Peptides: A New Weapon to Counteract Zoonosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Characterization of pBOq-IncQ and pBOq-95LK Plasmids of Escherichia coli BOq 01, a New Isolated Strain from Poultry Farming, Involved in Antibiotic Resistance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification and Characterisation of pST1023 A Mosaic, Multidrug-Resistant and Mobilisable IncR Plasmid

1
Department of Biology, University of Bari, Via Orabona, 4, 70125 Bari, Italy
2
Institute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council of Italy (ISPA-CNR), Via G. Amendola 122/O, 70126 Bari, Italy
3
Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation (D.E.T.O.), University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
4
Department of Basic Medical Sciences Neurosciences and Sense Organs Medical Faculty, University of Bari, Piazza G. Cesare Policlinico, 70124 Bari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(8), 1592; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081592
Submission received: 13 July 2022 / Revised: 1 August 2022 / Accepted: 4 August 2022 / Published: 8 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Resistance and Genetic Elements in Bacteria)

Abstract

:
We report the identification and characterisation of a mosaic, multidrug-resistant and mobilisable IncR plasmid (pST1023) detected in Salmonella ST1023, a monophasic variant 4,[5],12:i: strain of widespread pandemic lineage, reported as a Southern European clone. pST1023 contains exogenous DNA regions, principally gained from pSLT-derivatives and IncI1 plasmids. Acquisition from IncI1 included oriT and nikAB and these conferred the ability to be mobilisable in the presence of a helper plasmid, as we demonstrated with the conjugative plasmids pST1007-1D (IncFII) or pVC1035 (IncC). A sul3-associated class 1 integron, conferring resistance to aminoglycosides, chloramphenicol and trimethoprim-sulphonamides, was also embedded in the acquired IncI1 DNA segment. pST1023 also harboured an additional site-specific recombination system (rfsF/rsdB) and IS elements of the IS1, IS5 (IS903 group) and IS6 families. Four of the six IS26 elements present constituted two pseudo-compound-transposons, named PCT-sil and PCT-Tn10 (identified here for the first time). The study further highlighted the mosaic genetic architecture and the clinical importance of IncR plasmids. Moreover, it provides the first experimental data on the ability of IncR plasmids to be mobilised and their potential role in the horizontal spread of antimicrobial-resistant genes.

1. Introduction

Plasmids are self-replicating, extra-chromosome genetic elements and are considered an important driving force of bacteria evolution as they contribute towards generating genetic variability and also simply provide selective advantages, such as antimicrobial resistance [1]. The latter is of great importance since resistance to most available antimicrobial classes has been recognised as an emerging health problem on a worldwide scale. Indeed, the global increase in multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria has drastically been reducing the range of antimicrobials available to treat bacterial infections. This has made antimicrobial resistance to bacteria the major cause of death worldwide, as recently reported by a comprehensive survey on this, covering over 204 countries and territories and published in The Lancet journal [2].
Antimicrobial resistance genes can be embedded within genetic elements, such as transposons, compound transposons and integrons (mainly of class 1), that are often carried by plasmids (particularly in Entebacterales), which, in turn, greatly contribute to antimicrobial resistance spreading and the insurgence of multidrug-resistant bacteria [3,4]. Indeed, many bacteria genomes contain multiple plasmids whose persistence is achieved by vertical transmission to daughter cells and (if conjugative) by transmission through cell-to-cell conjugation. The ability to be horizontally transferable represents an evolutive advantage in that it would further extend the host range, thus, increasing the general level of long-term persistence in bacteria population [5,6].
Plasmids can generally be classified into different types according to their replication (replicon type) or mobility (MOB typing) loci [7,8]. Plasmids sharing the same replication system are unable to co-exist stably within the same host cell and are clustered in the same replicon type (group of incompatibility or Inc group). MOB typing, based on relaxase protein phylogenies, allows classification of transmissible plasmids into MOB families. IncR is a relatively recent replicon type, first reported in 2009 and identified in pK245, a plasmid harboured by a multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strain [9]. IncR plasmids are not included in the MOB typing system as they do not contain a relaxase gene. Additionally, they do not possess conjugational transfer genes and, thus, are not conjugative. Since their first identification, IncR plasmids have been isolated the world over, mainly from clinical multidrug-resistant strains [3]. The IncR replication and maintenance systems are principally composed of repB (replication initiation) and its iterons, parAB (partition) and vagCD (toxin–antitoxin). In addition to their core backbone, IncR plasmids may carry various accessory modules, often conferring resistance to different classes of antimicrobials that extend the size of these up to 160 Kb [10].
In this study, we report the identification and characterisation of a mosaic, multidrug-resistant and mobilisable IncR plasmid (pST1023) detected in the Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar 4,[5],12:i: strain ST1023. ST1023 belongs to the widespread pandemic lineage reported as a Southern European clone [11] and the finding of a mobilisable IncR plasmid, experimentally demonstrated here for the first time, is of concern for its potential role in the spread of antimicrobial-resistance genes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacteria Isolates, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Mobilisation Experiment

The STMV ST1023 is a clinical strain isolated in Southern Italy in 2008 [12]. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed as reported previously [13]. The antimicrobials were: ampicillin (Ap), chloramphenicol (Cm), streptomycin (Sm), sulphamethoxazole (Su), tetracycline (Tc) and trimethoprim (Tp). MIC (minimal inhibitory concentration) to silver nitrate was determined by the broth microdilution method with Mueller–Hinton (MH) broth according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. AgNO3 concentrations ranging between 2 and 512 μg/mL were tested [14]. ST1023 silver-resistant mutants were selected by plating saturated cultures (≥109 cfu/mL) onto MH agar containing AgNO3 up to 256 µg/mL.
Conjugation experiments were performed at 37 °C as described previously [15]. Antimicrobial concentrations were: Ap 100 µg/mL, Cm 25 µg/mL, nalidixic acid (Nx) 50 µg/mL, rifampicin (Rf) 100 µg/mL, Sm 100 µg/mL, Su 600 µg/mL, Tc 20 µg/mL and Tp 30 µg/mL. CSH26 Nx or DH5α Rf strains were used as recipients. The frequency of transfer (mean number of transconjugants per donor) was determined in three or more independent experiments and the standard deviation (SD) calculated.

2.2. DNA Sequencing, Assembly and Annotation

Total genomic DNA was extracted by the cetyl trimethylammonium bromide method [16]. Plasmid DNA was isolated as described previously [17]. About 1 μg of DNA was fragmented by using the Ion Shear™ Plus Reagents Kit (Life Technologies, a part of Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), followed by barcoded adapter ligation using the Ion Xpress™ Barcode Adapters (Life Technologies, a part of Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) and Ion Plus Fragment Library Kit (Life Technologies, a part of Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The library size was selected (~400 bp) using E-Gel® SizeSelect™ 2% Agarose Gel (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Library concentrations were quantified using the Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA). Sequencing template was prepared by using the Ion 520 & 530 Kit-OT2 kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) and then sequenced on an Ion 520 Chip using an Ion GeneStudio S5 System (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). Raw data were quality filtered and assembled by using the SPAdes assembler version 3.15.4 [18] and the included pipeline plasmidSPAdes (--plasmid). pST1023 plasmid DNA was sequenced using MinION (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, United Kingdom). Sequencing library was prepared using Rapid Sequencing Kit SQK-RAD004 (Life Technologies, a part of Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc) and 500ng of DNA following the manufacturer’s instructions. The sequencing was performed using the R9.4.1 flongle flowcell FLO-FLG001 for 24h, according to the information provided by the manufacturer (https://store.nanoporetech.com/eu/flongle-flow-cell-pack.html, last access on 18 February 2022). The basecalling of the raw signals from the sequencing run was performed with Guppy v.5.0.11 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) by the r9.4.1_450bps_hac model. Only the fastq files in the Guppy directory “pass”, considered as high-quality reads, were used for the assembly. De novo genome assembly of basecalled reads was performed using Canu v.2.2 with default parameters [19]. The complete genome sequence was deposited in NCBI and annotated by the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_prok/, last access on 1 July 2022 [20]. The genome of ST1023 is publicly available under the Bioproject ID PRJNA854888 in GenBank. Plasmid sequences of pSLT (GenBank Acc. N° AE006471.2)) and pST1030-1A (GenBank Acc. N° MT507877) were used for comparison.

2.3. Bioinformatic Analysis

Multilocus sequence type (MLST) of ST1023 was ST19. It was assigned using the PubMLST scheme for Salmonella spp. (https://pubmlst.org/; November 2021) with the following results: aroC10, dnaN7, hemD12, hisD9 and purE5 [21]. Similarity searches were performed using the BLASTN algorithm of the NCBI Web BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi; March 2022) and the entire or selected regions of pST1023 sequence as query. Results were graphically depicted by SnapGene (http://www.snapgene.com/; November 2021) and Adobe Illustrator (https://www.adobe.com/it/; November 2021) Plasmid replicon type was determined using the PlasmidFinder v.2.0.1 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/PlasmidFinder/; November 2021) [22,23]. ISFinder was used to identify complete or partial insertion sequences and mobile genetic elements (http://www-is.biotoul.fr; March 2022) [24]. Tandem repeats, period size and copy number of iterons were detected by Tandem repeats finder (https://tandem.bu.edu/trf/trf.html; March 2022) [25].

3. Results

3.1. Genome Sequence of ST1023 and Context of Resistance Genes

ST1023 is part of a collection of Salmonella MDR clinical strains isolated in Southern Italy from 2006 to 2012 [12]. The genome of ST1023 was sequenced and analysis of the aroC, dnaN, hemD, hisD, purE, sucA and thrA housekeeping gene classified ST1023 in the MLST group ST19. Based on the absence of the fljB gene, detected by PCR, ST1023 was assigned to the monophasic variant 4,[5],12:i:- [26]. The genome sequence of Salmonella Typhimurium LT2 (GenBank Acc. N° AE006468.2) was used as reference for comparison with that of ST1023. A large chromosomal deletion of 70,456 bp was detected in ST1023: it started at 435 bp downstream of STM2692 and ended in the inverted repeat sequence hixR of the segment H. The segment H, required for phase variation, contains the promoter for fljB and the hin gene, encoding a DNA invertase necessary for inversion of the H segment. The chromosomal deletion included the prophage Fels-2 genome, the region from STM2741 to STM2769 and the fljAB operon, whose absence accounted for the monophasic variant 4,[5],12:i:-. In the place of the 70,456 bp deletion, there was a fragment of 5349 bp. It was composed of six Open Reading Frames (ORFs), named ORF1 to ORF6. ORF2 showed partial homologies with both STM1053 and STM1054 (genes of the prophage Gifsy-2). ORF3 (549 bp) was partially homologous with STM1997, a gene reported to encode for a component (UmuC) of the DNA polymerase V. ORF4 was homologous to STM2704. ORF5 and ORF6 showed partial homologies with STM2705 and STM2706, respectively. STM2704, STM2705 and STM2706 are part of the Fels-2 prophage genome. ORF1 had no homology with any LT2 genes.
ST1023 was resistant to Cm, Sm, Su, Tc and Tp encoded by cmlA1, (aadA1, aadA2), sul3, tetA(B) and dfrA12, respectively. aadA1, aadA2, cmlA1, dfrA12 and sul3 were part of a sul3-associate class1 integron, while tetA(B) was part of a pseudo-compound transposon (see below). The antimicrobial-resistance genes were harboured by an IncR plasmid, named pST1023. The genomic and phenotypic features detected for ST1023 were consistent with those characterising the pandemic serotype 4,[5],12:i:- lineage referred to as the Southern European clone, a monophasic variant of S. Typhimurium that has emerged as a major global cause of non-typhoidal disease in animals and humans [11,27,28]. pST1023 also harboured a second pseudo-compound transposon harbouring a sil operon (see below). However, ST1023 was found sensitive to AgNO3 (MIC ranging from 4 to 8 µg/mL)

3.2. pST1023 Genetic Organisation

pST1023 consisted of 120,313 bp with an average G+C content of 51.4% (Figure 1). The assembled sequence was confirmed by comparing the BamHI, ClaI, HindIII and KpnI restriction profiles generated in silico with those obtained from restrictions of plasmid DNA. Based on computational analysis for functional gene prediction, three major regions designated IncR backbone, I1 and SLT (the last two traceable to plasmids IncI and pSLT derivatives, respectively) were identified. pST1023 also harboured a Tn21-derived element lacking in the mer operon (termed Tn21mer), two IS26-bound pseudo-compound transposons [29] carrying a Tn10-derived and a sil gene cluster, named PCT-Tn10 and PCT-sil, respectively, and IS elements (or their isoforms) of the families IS1, IS5 and IS6 (Table S1).
The IncR backbone included repB (that encodes the replication initiation protein RepB) and its iterons (composed of 36 bp present in 10,4 copies), parAB (a partition system encoding the ATPase protein ParA and the centromere-binding protein ParB), umuCD (that encodes an error-prone DNA polymerase V, a key contributor in the SOS response), retA (a group IIB intron-encoding reverse transcriptase), rfsF-resD (site-specific recombination system) and vagCD (encoding a type II toxin–antitoxin (TA) system, consisting of VagC antitoxin and VagD toxin) [10,30]. vagCD was inversely oriented and separated from rfsF by region I1 (57,754 bp). Region I1 was composed of a remnant of fragment C (7.1 Kb, see below), a Tn21mer (14.6 Kb) and a 32.5 Kb fragment (called I1-oriT); the last was linked to sequences from the leading region and part of the conjugative region of IncI1 plasmids [31]. The fragment C has mainly been identified in IncI1 plasmids, some of which had a Tn21-derived transposon (like the Tn21mer but retaining the mer operon) inserted into ydfA [17]. The Tn21mer also mapped next to 5′-ΔydfA and was composed of tnpA (transposase), tnpR (resolvase), tnpM (interrupted by a sul3-associated class 1 integron, carrying the array dfrA12-orfF-aadA2-cmlA1-aadA1-qacH) and mef (interrupted by the IS261). The fragment I1-oriT was composed of: I) the impCAB operon (impB was interrupted by the IS261) encoding (based on the homology to umuCD) an error-prone DNA repair system [32]; II) the psiAB operon (inhibition system of the SOS response that during conjugation prevents LexA autocleavage catalysed by RecA) [33]; III) the ardA gene, encoding an anti-restriction and anti-modification protein that prevents cleavage at foreign DNA entering a new bacteria host [34]; IV) the relaxation complex, composed of the oriT sequence (origin of transfer) and the nikAB gene cluster (encoding the oriT-specific DNA binding protein NikA and the relaxase NikB, respectively) [31]; V) the trbABC operon essential for conjugational transfer of IncI1 plasmids (TrbA and TrbC are key elements in delivery DNA molecules to be secreted across the T4SS) [35]; VI) the toxin/antitoxin system pndABC (Hok/Sok TA family), composed of a stable mRNA encoding a toxin (e.g., PndA), a more unstable antisense mRNA (e.g., PndB encoded mRNA) and pndC, which modulates pndA expression by promoting its translation [35]; VII) the entry exclusion system composed of excA and traY [36]; VIII) the traX gene encoding an inner membrane conjugal transfer pilus acetylation protein; and IX) the traW gene (encoding a lipoprotein) interrupted by the IS262-v1 (classified by the recent proposed nomenclature as IS26-v1 in that differing from IS26 sequence for three nucleotides, of which two caused the single amino acid substitution G184N in the catalytic domain of Tnp26 [37]). Between pndABC and excA, there was an IS1N element flanked by an 8 bp (CGATAGCT) target site duplication (TSD). Between region I1 and vagCD, we mapped a multiple ΔIS locus (locus A) composed of a ΔIS102 element (IS5 family), truncated by an IS2 element (IS3 family), truncated by an ISEc15 (IS3 family), truncated by a Tn5393 (Tn3 family), interrupted by the IS262-v1 (Figure S1). Downstream of vagCD was the region SLT that included an rfsF-RsdB system, the type II TA system ccdAB [38,39] and the spvABCD operon (associated with strains that cause non-typhoid bacteraemia), with its positive regulator spvR [40]. A PCT-Tn10 (flanked by IS26) was inserted into spvC, splitting the SLT region into two fragments, of which one carried the 3′-ΔspvC and one, inversely oriented, the 5′-ΔspvC. TSD of 8 bp (CTTTAAAG) was detected downstream of both 3′-ΔspvC and 5′-ΔspvC. The PCT-Tn10 harboured three genes (jemA, jem B and jemC) unrelated to tetracycline resistance, genes encoding tetracycline resistance (tetA, tetC and tetD) and tetR encoding tetracycline transcriptional repressor [41]. tetD was interrupted by the IS264-v1 that caused loss of IS10-R of the ancestral Tn10; of the IS10-L, only 66 bp were retained. Between the IS263 and ΔIS10-L being mapped were a locus named locus B, composed of a ΔTnEc1, a ΔIS1, a fragment of 68 bp and an IS903B element (Figure S2). Following the SLT region mapped PCT-sil (flanked by IS264-v1 and IS265), composed of the silE, silC, silF, silB, silA, silG and silP structural genes and the two-component silver-responsive transcriptional genes silR and silS [42]. The mechanism of silver resistance includes a cation sequestration in the periplasm (via SilE and SilF), an active silver efflux (via SilCBA efflux transporter and a putative P-type ATPase transporter SilP) and a signal transduction system, mediated by the sensor histidine kinase SilS and the response regulator protein SilR. The sil genes cluster was flanked by two ΔIS1 (referable in the IS finder database as either IS1A, IS1R or IS1S) interrupted by the IS264-v1 and IS265. Downstream of (554 bp) silP, there was an IS element (ISKpn74) of the IS5 family subgroup IS903 [43].
Between PCT-sil and the IncR backbone, there was a region of about 7227 bp where the 4651 bp just upstream of retA were found linked to many IncR plasmids (see below). This last region (termed N) was characterised by the two IS elements IS903B (subgroup IS903, family IS5 [44,45]) and IS1X3 (family IS1 [46], and a sequence of the IncN backbone composed of a remnant of repA (encoding the IncN replication initiation protein) and its iterons (composed of 37 bp present in 24.3 copies representing the RepA-binding site) [47,48]. The 2576 bp, spanning from PCT-sil to the N region, included an IS1X2 (family IS1) and an open reading frame of 741 bp, encoding for a putative tyrosine recombinase. Tyrosine recombinases constitute a large family of proteins involved in different biological processes (e.g., post-replicative segregation of plasmids) [49].

3.3. pST1023 A Mosaic Plasmid

Plasmids can be shaped by homologous recombination, non-homologous end joining and rearrangements of unknown mechanisms that lead to the generation of mosaic plasmids [1]. We then explored whether pST1023 might fall within this class of plasmids by searching the singular regions or their partial sequences (termed sub-fragments) for high similarity (100% coverage and ≥99.9% identity) (Figure 2).
The overall structure of region I1 was not detected in any plasmid. However, when the search was carried out for its sub-fragments C and I1-oriT, or the Tn21mer, a number of hits was found. Fragment C was identified in IncI1-complex (32), IncFII (4) and IncFIIs-FIB (1) plasmids and in plasmids of an unknown incompatibility group (2). The Tn21mer was found in the Tn21-derived element (that included sequences identical to Tn21mer), harboured by plasmids IncX1 (13), IncI1 (4), IncH1 (1), IncR (1), IncFII/FIB (1), IncFIIs/IB (1) and ColE1 (1). The fragment I1-oriT (excluding the IS1N sequence) was detected in 3 IncI1 plasmids (pST1030-1A and its derivatives pST1030-1B and pST1030-1C, GenBank Acc. N° MT507877, MT507879 and MT507880, respectively). Only the last three IncI1 plasmids harboured the sub-fragments C and I1-oriT and the Tn21mer, albeit differently organised along their sequences. The SLT fragments flanking PCT-Tn10 were detected in many pSLT-derived plasmids. Overall, these data are consistent with a classification of pST1023 as a mosaic plasmid.
We also tried to track down IncR plasmids that shared markers with pST1023, whose common genetic organisation might mirror possible common evolutionary steps. Three DNA sequences were selected: that of region N (already reported in many IncR plasmids) and those of loci A and B (whose genetic structures were the output of precise events of insertions and/or recombination of IS and Tn elements) (Figures S1 and S2, respectively). Seventy-four IncR sequences were found to harbour high-similar regions N (100% coverage and ≥99.9% identity) linked to the IncR backbone. Of the 74 retrieved sequences, 18 lacked vagCD (DNA homology ended to rfsF), 2 had vagCD separated from rfsF by DNA fragments different in size and genetic information and 48 retained vagCD, next to rfsF, linked to sequences (ΔIS102-ΔIS2 and ISEc15 or ΔISEc15) related to locus A as follows: 1, pF18S020 (GenBank Acc. N° CP082454), held an intact ISEc15, 41 had ISEc15 disrupted (same nucleotide position) by an ISKpn60 and 6 the ISEc15 disrupted (same nucleotide position as in pST1023, see below) by a Tn5393 (GenBank Acc. N° CP057379, CP058068, CP064111, KM877517, LR890355 and LR890753). In pST01023, the ISEc15 (disrupted by Tn5393) was then interrupted by an IS262-v1 element, thus, generating the structure of locus A. In pST1023, the region, including vagCD (3320 bp), was inversely oriented and separated from rfsF by the region I1.
In addition to locus A, the two plasmids with GenBank Acc. N° CP057379 and CP058068 (plasmids pRHB28-C14_2 and pRHB02-C19_6, respectively) also harboured an identical locus B, localised next to the remnant of gene brxL (nucleotide position 7467-8555 in GenBank Acc. N° CP058068). Locus B might have originated in a pKqq_18A069_2 (GenBank Acc. N° CP084820) -like plasmid, where a ΔIS1-TnEc1 was separated from the estP (nucleotide position 24.426-27.002) gene by a 55 bp fragment. Insertion of IS903B into estP (13 bp from its 3′ end) generated the multi-IS locus B (IS903B separated from ΔIS1-ΔTnEc1 by 68 bp that included the 13 bp 3′estP) found in the plasmid p1506-1 (GenBank Acc. N° CP059289). However, locus B in pRHB28-C14_2 and pRHB02-C19_6 was found next to the brxL gene or, as in pST1023, within the PCT-Tn10. The origin of this different genetic localisation may result from recombination events, possibly mediated by IS903B [50]. Plasmids pRHB28-C14_2 and pRHB02-C19_6 were virtually identical to each other (99.8% identity, coverage 100%), had a size (about 43 Kb) smaller than that of pST1023 and, interestingly, harboured a complete Tn10. These data together suggest that pRHB28-C14_2, pRHB02-C19_6 and pST1023 might have shared possible common evolutionary steps.

3.4. pST1023 Mobilisation

Conjugation experiments to assess the self-horizontal transfer of pST1023 failed to detect any transconjugants (detection frequency less than 1 × 10−9) (Table 1). Detection of the IncI1 relaxation complex (oriT and nikAB) in pST1023 prompted us to investigate its possible mobilisation, mediated by the copresence of conjugative plasmids. The self-transmissible plasmids pST1007-1D (IncFII, encoding resistance to Ap-Sm-Su ([17]) and pVC1035 (IncC, encoding resistance to Ap-Kn-Sm-Su-Tc ([51]) were introduced (by conjugation) into ST1023, generating the transconjugants BA3A and BA3B, respectively. Results from mating types using BA3A or BA3B as donor and CSH26 Nx as recipient highlighted the mobilisation of pST1023, mediated by either pST1007-1D (transconjugant BA3D) or pVC1035 (transconjugant BA3F), with a mean frequency of 8 × 10−5 and 1.6 × 10−4, respectively. The presence of pST1023 in BA3D and BA3F was also assessed by PCR and enzyme restrictions of plasmid content.

4. Discussion

Plasmids are genetic elements that may supply a valuable and variable gene pool. Moreover, features, such as maintenance over generations into daughter cells and ability to transfer from hosting to recipient cells, make plasmids a driving force of bacteria ecology and evolution [1]. Plasmids are subject to molecular evolution through genetic reassortments, mainly occurring among plasmids themselves or with other genetic elements, such as integrons, transposons, etc. In this respect, a set of plasmids, termed “mosaic”, has recently been the topic of growing scientific interest, as shown by the number of studies published on this topic [52,53,54]. Identification and characterisation of mosaic plasmids can, indeed, help to better assess the extent of molecular dynamics (both known and yet to be discovered) on plasmid evolution and the role played by this set of plasmids in the spread of genes conferring selective advantages, including those encoding antimicrobial resistance [55,56].
pST1023 is a mosaic, multidrug-resistant and mobilisable IncR plasmid, harboured by the clinical strain ST1023, a monophasic variant 4,[5],12:i:- of the widespread pandemic lineage, reported as a Southern European clone. pST1023 acquired exogenous DNA fragments from other plasmids, mostly IncI1 and pSLT-derivatives. Some of these fragments conferred resistance to different classes of antimicrobials. One, probably acquired from an IncI1 plasmid, carried a sul3-associated class 1 integron (embedded into a Tn21mer) that conferred resistance to aminoglycosides, chloramphenicol and trimethoprim-sulphonamides. The second, PCT-Tn10, conferred resistance to tetracycline. Other acquired fragments, also from IncI1 plasmids, carried oriT and nikAB that allowed pST1023 to be horizontally transferred by the copresence of a conjugative plasmid, as we demonstrated with the IncFII and IncC plasmids pST1007-1D and pVC1035, respectively.
Acquisition of some of pST1023′s exogenous DNA fragments could be the result of transposase activity of different IS elements, such as IS26 and IS903B [57]. The presence of six IS26 elements, of which four were organised into two pseudo-compound transposons (PCT-Tn10 and PCT-sil), might be consistent with that possibility and also reinforce the role played by this class of IS in shaping plasmids and spreading ARGs. In this respect, it is worth noting that two IS26s (IS26-2 and IS26-4) were classified as IS26-v1, an IS26 variant with enhanced activity [37], and that IS26-4 was part of PCT-Tn10. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the detection of this pseudo-compound transposon and this finding poses concern regarding the diffusion of tetracycline resistance.
Silver ions and silver-based compounds (e.g., nanoparticles) are well-known antimicrobial agents used in clinical and medical practice, as well as in agricultural and industrial products [58,59]. As a result, isolation of silver-resistant bacteria has recently been increasing, making silver resistance an emerging problem [60,61]. Moreover, cryptic silver resistance that can be readily activated by single missense mutation in silS (encoding the sensor histidine kinase) has widely been reported for some genera (e.g., Enterobacter and Klebsiella) [62,63]. ST1023 is sensitive to AgNO3; however, spontaneous ST1023 silver-resistant mutants were selected on MHA plates added with AgNO3 up to 256 µg/mL. Analysis of these mutants is in progress to assess the possible cryptic silver resistance of ST1023. Anyway, the finding of sil operon organised into an IS26-bound transposon (PCT-sil) is undoubtedly of concern, since IS26 elements are encountered with increasing frequency in genomes (especially plasmids) of clinically relevant bacteria [64].
Mechanisms of recombination, other than those mediated by transposases, for instance, site-specific recombination systems (rfsF-RsdB and rfsF-ResD), may also have contributed to the acquisition of the exogenous DNA fragments SLT and I1, respectively. In this regard, it is worth mentioning the finding of some IncR plasmids with vagCD separated from the core backbone through the insertion of different DNA fragments mapping just downstream rfsF. In pST1023, the rfsF-ResD system might have been involved in acquisition of the region I1 from IncI1 plasmids, such as pST1030-1A. Acquisition from IncI1 plasmids (like pST1030-1A) and involving the rfsF-ResD system has also been reported for the mosaic IncFII-plasmid pST1007-1A. It is noteworthy that pST1007-1A, pST1023 and pST1030-1A were all isolated from Salmonella clinical cases, which occurred in Apulia in the three-year period 2006–2008.
The broad host range of IncR plasmids has been linked to the possibility that these plasmids are mobilisable [3,65]. However, sequencing results showed that IncR plasmids did not possess relaxase genes nor origin of transfer sequences (oriT) and the mobilisation of IncR plasmids remains to be proven. In this study, we report the first experimental data on the mobilisation of a mosaic, multidrug-resistant IncR plasmid, pST1023, containing the IncI1 oriT-nikAB region. The study also attempts to outline possible evolutionary steps shared with other IncR plasmids.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms10081592/s1; Figure S1: Locus A; Figure S2: Locus B. Table S1: ISFinder Blast results.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.O. and C.P.; methodology, C.C. (Carla Calia), M.O. and C.P.; validation, M.O., C.C. (Carla Calia), M.S. and C.P.; formal analysis, C.P.; investigation, M.O., C.C. (Carla Calia), M.F., G.M., C.F.M., C.C. (Cosimo Cumbo), A.M. and M.S.; resources, R.M.; data curation, M.O. and C.C. (Carla Calia); writing—original draft preparation, C.C. (Carla Calia) and M.O.; writing—review and editing, C.P.; visualization, M.O.; supervision, C.P.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The genome of ST1023 is publicly available under the Bioproject ID PRJNA854888 in GenBank.

Acknowledgments

Very many thanks to Karen Laxton for writing assistance. Special thanks are also due to Pietro D’Addabbo for technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rodriguez-Beltran, J.; DelaFuente, J.; Leon-Sampedro, R.; MacLean, R.C.; San Millan, A. Beyond horizontal gene transfer: The role of plasmids in bacterial evolution. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 347–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Murray, C.J.I.; Ikuta, K.S.; Sharara, K.S.F.; Swetschinski, L.; Gray, A.; Han, C.; Bisignano, C.; Rao, P.; Wool, E.; Johnson, S.C.; et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: A systematic analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 629–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rozwandowicz, M.; Brouwer, M.S.M.; Fischer, J.; Wagenaar, J.A.; Gonzalez-Zorn, B.; Guerra, B.; Mevius, D.J.; Hordijk, J. Plasmids carrying antimicrobial resistance genes in Enterobacteriaceae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 1121–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Partridge, S.R.; Kwong, S.M.; Firth, N.; Jensen, S.O. Mobile Genetic Elements Associated with Antimicrobial Resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 31, e00088-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Hulter, N.; Ilhan, J.; Wein, T.; Kadibalban, A.S.; Hammerschmidt, K.; Dagan, T. An evolutionary perspective on plasmid lifestyle modes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2017, 38, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wein, T.; Dagan, T. Plasmid evolution. Curr. Biol. 2020, 30, R1158–R1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Carattoli, A.; Bertini, A.; Villa, L.; Falbo, V.; Hopkins, K.L.; Threlfall, E.J. Identification of plasmids by PCR-based replicon typing. J. Microbiol. Methods 2005, 63, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Garcillan-Barcia, M.P.; Francia, M.V.; de la Cruz, F. The diversity of conjugative relaxases and its application in plasmid classification. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 33, 657–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Garcia-Fernandez, A.; Fortini, D.; Veldman, K.; Mevius, D.; Carattoli, A. Characterization of plasmids harbouring qnrS1, qnrB2 and qnrB19 genes in Salmonella. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2009, 63, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jing, Y.; Jiang, X.; Yin, Z.; Hu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, W.; Yang, H.; Gao, B.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, D.; et al. Genomic diversification of IncR plasmids from China. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2019, 19, 358–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mourao, J.; Machado, J.; Novais, C.; Antunes, P.; Peixe, L. Characterization of the emerging clinically-relevant multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype 4,[5],12:i:- (monophasic variant of S. Typhimurium) clones. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect Dis. 2014, 33, 2249–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. De Vito, D.; Monno, R.; Nuccio, F.; Legretto, M.; Oliva, M.; Coscia, M.F.; Dionisi, A.M.; Calia, C.; Capolongo, C.; Pazzani, C. Diffusion and persistence of multidrug resistant Salmonella Typhimurium strains phage type DT120 in southern Italy. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 265042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Oliva, M.; Monno, R.; D’Addabbo, P.; Pesole, G.; Dionisi, A.M.; Scrascia, M.; Chiara, M.; Horner, D.S.; Manzari, C.; Luzzi, I.; et al. A novel group of IncQ1 plasmids conferring multidrug resistance. Plasmid 2017, 89, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. (CLSI), C.a.L.S.I. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically, 10th ed.; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2015; Volume 35, p. M07-A10. [Google Scholar]
  15. Oliva, M.; Calia, C.; Ferrara, M.; D’Addabbo, P.; Scrascia, M.; Mule, G.; Monno, R.; Pazzani, C. Antimicrobial resistance gene shuffling and a three-element mobilisation system in the monophasic Salmonella typhimurium strain ST1030. Plasmid 2020, 111, 102532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Murray, M.G.; Thompson, W.F. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980, 8, 4321–4325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Oliva, M.; Monno, R.; Addabbo, P.; Pesole, G.; Scrascia, M.; Calia, C.; Dionisi, A.M.; Chiara, M.; Horner, D.S.; Manzari, C.; et al. IS26 mediated antimicrobial resistance gene shuffling from the chromosome to a mosaic conjugative FII plasmid. Plasmid 2018, 100, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. A J. Comput. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Koren, S.; Walenz, B.P.; Berlin, K.; Miller, J.R.; Bergman, N.H.; Phillippy, A.M. Canu: Scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome. Res. 2017, 27, 722–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Tatusova, T.; DiCuccio, M.; Badretdin, A.; Chetvernin, V.; Nawrocki, E.P.; Zaslavsky, L.; Lomsadze, A.; Pruitt, K.D.; Borodovsky, M.; Ostell, J. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 6614–6624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jolley, K.A.; Bray, J.E.; Maiden, M.C.J. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res. 2018, 3, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Carattoli, A.; Zankari, E.; Garcia-Fernandez, A.; Voldby Larsen, M.; Lund, O.; Villa, L.; Moller Aarestrup, F.; Hasman, H. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 3895–3903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Camacho, C.; Coulouris, G.; Avagyan, V.; Ma, N.; Papadopoulos, J.; Bealer, K.; Madden, T.L. BLAST+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Siguier, P.; Filee, J.; Chandler, M. Insertion sequences in prokaryotic genomes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2006, 9, 526–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Benson, G. Tandem repeats finder: A program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Echeita, M.A.; Herrera, S.; Usera, M.A. Atypical, fljB-negative Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica strain of serovar 4,5,12:i:- appears to be a monophasic variant of serovar Typhimurium. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 2981–2983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Ingle, D.J.; Ambrose, R.L.; Baines, S.L.; Duchene, S.; Goncalves da Silva, A.; Lee, D.Y.J.; Jones, M.; Valcanis, M.; Taiaroa, G.; Ballard, S.A.; et al. Evolutionary dynamics of multidrug resistant Salmonella enterica serovar 4,[5],12:i:- in Australia. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Arrieta-Gisasola, A.; Atxaerandio-Landa, A.; Garrido, V.; Grillo, M.J.; Martinez-Ballesteros, I.; Laorden, L.; Garaizar, J.; Bikandi, J. Genotyping Study of Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- Monophasic Variant of Serovar Typhimurium and Characterization of the Second-Phase Flagellar Deletion by Whole Genome Sequencing. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Harmer, C.J.; Pong, C.H.; Hall, R.M. Structures bounded by directly-oriented members of the IS26 family are pseudo-compound transposons. Plasmid 2020, 111, 102530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guo, Q.; Spychala, C.N.; McElheny, C.L.; Doi, Y. Comparative analysis of an IncR plasmid carrying armA, blaDHA-1 and qnrB4 from Klebsiella pneumoniae ST37 isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 882–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Sampei, G.; Furuya, N.; Tachibana, K.; Saitou, Y.; Suzuki, T.; Mizobuchi, K.; Komano, T. Complete genome sequence of the incompatibility group I1 plasmid R64. Plasmid 2010, 64, 92–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lodwick, D.; Owen, D.; Strike, P. DNA sequence analysis of the imp UV protection and mutation operon of the plasmid TP110: Identification of a third gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990, 18, 5045–5050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Bagdasarian, M.; Bailone, A.; Bagdasarian, M.M.; Manning, P.A.; Lurz, R.; Timmis, K.N.; Devoret, R. An inhibitor of SOS induction, specified by a plasmid locus in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 5723–5726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Chen, K.; Reuter, M.; Sanghvi, B.; Roberts, G.A.; Cooper, L.P.; Tilling, M.; Blakely, G.W.; Dryden, D.T. ArdA proteins from different mobile genetic elements can bind to the EcoKI Type I DNA methyltransferase of E. coli K12. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1844, 505–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Furuya, N.; Komano, T. Nucleotide sequence and characterization of the trbABC region of the IncI1 Plasmid R64: Existence of the pnd gene for plasmid maintenance within the transfer region. J. Bacteriol. 1996, 178, 1491–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Sakuma, T.; Tazumi, S.; Furuya, N.; Komano, T. ExcA proteins of IncI1 plasmid R64 and IncIgamma plasmid R621a recognize different segments of their cognate TraY proteins in entry exclusion. Plasmid 2013, 69, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pong, C.H.; Harmer, C.J.; Ataide, S.F.; Hall, R.M. An IS26 variant with enhanced activity. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2019, 366, fnz031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jaffe, A.; Ogura, T.; Hiraga, S. Effects of the ccd function of the F plasmid on bacterial growth. J. Bacteriol. 1985, 163, 841–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Gerdes, K.; Rasmussen, P.B.; Molin, S. Unique type of plasmid maintenance function: Postsegregational killing of plasmid-free cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 3116–3120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Guiney, D.G.; Fierer, J. The Role of the spv Genes in Salmonella Pathogenesis. Front. Microbiol. 2011, 2, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Lawley, T.D.; Burland, V.; Taylor, D.E. Analysis of the complete nucleotide sequence of the tetracycline-resistance transposon Tn10. Plasmid 2000, 43, 235–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gupta, A.; Matsui, K.; Lo, J.F.; Silver, S. Molecular basis for resistance to silver cations in Salmonella. Nat. Med. 1999, 5, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Eger, E.; Heiden, S.E.; Becker, K.; Rau, A.; Geisenhainer, K.; Idelevich, E.A.; Schaufler, K. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae Sequence Type 420 with a Chromosomally Inserted Virulence Plasmid. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mollet, B.; Clerget, M.; Meyer, J.; Iida, S. Organization of the Tn6-related kanamycin resistance transposon Tn2680 carrying two copies of IS26 and an IS903 variant, IS903. B. J. Bacteriol. 1985, 163, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Siguier, P.; Gourbeyre, E.; Varani, A.; Ton-Hoang, B.; Chandler, M. Everyman’s Guide to Bacterial Insertion Sequences. Microbiol. Spectr. 2015, 3, MDNA3-0030-2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Mahillon, J.; Chandler, M. Insertion sequences. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1998, 62, 725–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Papp, P.P.; Iyer, V.N. Determination of the binding sites of RepA, a replication initiator protein of the basic replicon of the IncN group plasmid pCU1. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 246, 595–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Eikmeyer, F.; Hadiati, A.; Szczepanowski, R.; Wibberg, D.; Schneiker-Bekel, S.; Rogers, L.M.; Brown, C.J.; Top, E.M.; Puhler, A.; Schluter, A. The complete genome sequences of four new IncN plasmids from wastewater treatment plant effluent provide new insights into IncN plasmid diversity and evolution. Plasmid 2012, 68, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Smyshlyaev, G.; Bateman, A.; Barabas, O. Sequence analysis of tyrosine recombinases allows annotation of mobile genetic elements in prokaryotic genomes. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2021, 17, e9880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tavakoli, N.P.; Derbyshire, K.M. Tipping the balance between replicative and simple transposition. Embo J. 2001, 20, 2923–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Coppo, A.; Colombo, M.; Pazzani, C.; Bruni, R.; Mohamud, K.A.; Omar, K.H.; Mastrandrea, S.; Salvia, A.M.; Rotigliano, G.; Maimone, F. Vibrio cholerae in the horn of Africa: Epidemiology, plasmids, tetracycline resistance gene amplification, and comparison between O1 and non-O1 strains. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1995, 53, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pesesky, M.W.; Tilley, R.; Beck, D.A.C. Mosaic plasmids are abundant and unevenly distributed across prokaryotic taxa. Plasmid 2019, 102, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. David, S.; Cohen, V.; Reuter, S.; Sheppard, A.E.; Giani, T.; Parkhill, J.; Rossolini, G.M.; Feil, E.J.; Grundmann, H.; Aanensen, D.M. Integrated chromosomal and plasmid sequence analyses reveal diverse modes of carbapenemase gene spread among Klebsiella pneumoniae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 25043–25054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. McMillan, E.A.; Jackson, C.R.; Frye, J.G. Transferable Plasmids of Salmonella enterica Associated With Antibiotic Resistance Genes. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 562181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yang, X.; Dong, N.; Liu, X.; Yang, C.; Ye, L.; Chan, E.W.; Zhang, R.; Chen, S. Co-conjugation of Virulence Plasmid and KPC Plasmid in a Clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae Strain. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 739461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Alonso, C.A.; de Toro, M.; de la Cruz, F.; Torres, C. Genomic Insights into Drug Resistance and Virulence Platforms, CRISPR-Cas Systems and Phylogeny of Commensal E. coli from Wildlife. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hao, M.; Schuyler, J.; Zhang, H.; Shashkina, E.; Du, H.; Fouts, D.E.; Satlin, M.; Kreiswirth, B.N.; Chen, L. Apramycin resistance in epidemic carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258 strains. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2021, 76, 2017–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sim, W.; Barnard, R.T.; Blaskovich, M.A.T.; Ziora, Z.M. Antimicrobial Silver in Medicinal and Consumer Applications: A Patent Review of the Past Decade (2007(-)2017). Antibiotics 2018, 7, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Deshmukh, S.P.; Patil, S.M.; Mullani, S.B.; Delekar, S.D. Silver nanoparticles as an effective disinfectant: A review. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 97, 954–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hosny, A.E.M.; Rasmy, S.A.; Aboul-Magd, D.S.; Kashef, M.T.; El-Bazza, Z.E. The increasing threat of silver-resistance in clinical isolates from wounds and burns. Infect. Drug Resist. 2019, 12, 1985–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. McNeilly, O.; Mann, R.; Hamidian, M.; Gunawan, C. Emerging Concern for Silver Nanoparticle Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii and Other Bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 652863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Elkrewi, E.; Randall, C.P.; Ooi, N.; Cottell, J.L.; O’Neill, A.J. Cryptic silver resistance is prevalent and readily activated in certain Gram-negative pathogens. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, 3043–3046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Wang, H.; Li, J.; Min, C.; Xia, F.; Tang, M.; Hu, Y.; Zou, M. Characterization of Silver Resistance and Coexistence of sil Operon with Antibiotic Resistance Genes among Gram-Negative Pathogens Isolated from Wound Samples by Using Whole-Genome Sequencing. Infect. Drug Resist. 2022, 15, 1425–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Varani, A.; He, S.; Siguier, P.; Ross, K.; Chandler, M. The IS6 family, a clinically important group of insertion sequences including IS26. Mob. DNA 2021, 12, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Bielak, E.; Bergenholtz, R.D.; Jorgensen, M.S.; Sorensen, S.J.; Hansen, L.H.; Hasman, H. Investigation of diversity of plasmids carrying the blaTEM-52 gene. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 66, 2465–2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Physical map of pST1023. Outer ring: selected annotated open reading frames, IS elements and specific loci are shown. Arrows indicate the 5′ to 3′ transcription direction. Inner ring: the different regions that constitute the mosaic pST1023 are shown with coloured boxes: IncR backbone (red orange), Fragment C and I1-oriT (blue), SLT (dark terracotta), Tn21mer (light blue), PCT-Tn10 (apple green) and PCT-sil (grey). IS26 (yellow) and IS903B (green) are numbered.
Figure 1. Physical map of pST1023. Outer ring: selected annotated open reading frames, IS elements and specific loci are shown. Arrows indicate the 5′ to 3′ transcription direction. Inner ring: the different regions that constitute the mosaic pST1023 are shown with coloured boxes: IncR backbone (red orange), Fragment C and I1-oriT (blue), SLT (dark terracotta), Tn21mer (light blue), PCT-Tn10 (apple green) and PCT-sil (grey). IS26 (yellow) and IS903B (green) are numbered.
Microorganisms 10 01592 g001
Figure 2. The mosaic plasmid pST1023. Shaded regions, with nucleotide identity ≥99%, are marked by colours. (A) IncR plasmids sharing the N region, R backbone, loci A and B. (B) Linear map of pST1023. The different regions that constitute the mosaic pST1023 are shown with coloured boxes. IS26 elements are in yellow. (C) Regions of IncI1 plasmids (such as pST1030-1A) shared with pST1023. (D) Regions of pSLT-derived plasmids shared with pST1023. (E) Sequences of rfsF sites are reported.
Figure 2. The mosaic plasmid pST1023. Shaded regions, with nucleotide identity ≥99%, are marked by colours. (A) IncR plasmids sharing the N region, R backbone, loci A and B. (B) Linear map of pST1023. The different regions that constitute the mosaic pST1023 are shown with coloured boxes. IS26 elements are in yellow. (C) Regions of IncI1 plasmids (such as pST1030-1A) shared with pST1023. (D) Regions of pSLT-derived plasmids shared with pST1023. (E) Sequences of rfsF sites are reported.
Microorganisms 10 01592 g002
Table 1. Conjugation experiments and mobilisation of pST1023.
Table 1. Conjugation experiments and mobilisation of pST1023.
StrainResistance(s) aResistance GenesPlasmidTransconjugant (Plasmid)Resistance Genes Transferred by ConjugationFrequency of Conjugation (SD) d
ST1023CmSmSuTcTpdfrA12-aadA2-cmlA1-aadA1-sul3-tetB-tetCpST1023NDnonenone
BA3ACmSmSuTcTpdfrA12-aadA2-cmlA1-aadA1-sul3-tetB-tetCpST1023BA3C
ApSmSublaTEM-strAB-sul2pST1007-1D (b)(pST1007-1D)blaTEM-strAB-sul23.0 (±3.9) × 10−1
BA3D
(pST1007-1D)blaTEM-strAB-sul2; tetB8.0 (±0.2) × 10−5
(pST1023)dfrA12-aadA2-cmlA1-aadA1-sul3-tetB-tetC
BA3BCmSmSuTcTpdfrA12-aadA2-cmlA1-aadA1-sul3-tetB-tetCpST1023BA3EblaTEM-aphaI-strAB-sul2-tetD1.6 (±0.0) × 10−1
ApKnSmSuTcblaTEM-aphaI-strAB-sul2-tetDpVC1035 (c)(pVC1035)
BA3F
(pVC1035)blaTEM-aphaI-strAB-sul2-tetD1.6 (±0.0) × 10−4
(pST1023)dfrA12-aadA2-cmlA1-aadA1-sul3-tetB-tetC
a Ampicillin (Ap); Kanamycin (Kn); Chloramphenicol (Cm); Streptomycin (Sm); Sulfamethoxazole (Su); Tetracycline (Tc); Trimethoprim (Tp). b Inc I1 plasmid. c IncC plasmid. d Values represent the mean of transconjugants per donor (SD stands for Standard Deviation). ND: not detectable.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Calia, C.; Oliva, M.; Ferrara, M.; Minervini, C.F.; Scrascia, M.; Monno, R.; Mulè, G.; Cumbo, C.; Marzella, A.; Pazzani, C. Identification and Characterisation of pST1023 A Mosaic, Multidrug-Resistant and Mobilisable IncR Plasmid. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1592. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081592

AMA Style

Calia C, Oliva M, Ferrara M, Minervini CF, Scrascia M, Monno R, Mulè G, Cumbo C, Marzella A, Pazzani C. Identification and Characterisation of pST1023 A Mosaic, Multidrug-Resistant and Mobilisable IncR Plasmid. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(8):1592. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081592

Chicago/Turabian Style

Calia, Carla, Marta Oliva, Massimo Ferrara, Crescenzio Francesco Minervini, Maria Scrascia, Rosa Monno, Giuseppina Mulè, Cosimo Cumbo, Angelo Marzella, and Carlo Pazzani. 2022. "Identification and Characterisation of pST1023 A Mosaic, Multidrug-Resistant and Mobilisable IncR Plasmid" Microorganisms 10, no. 8: 1592. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081592

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop