Review: Effect of Experimental Diets on the Microbiome of Productive Animals
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Microbiome
3. Ruminant Animals
3.1. Cattle
3.2. Sheep
3.3. Goats
4. Monogastric Animals
4.1. Chickens
4.2. Pigs
5. Fish
5.1. Salmon
5.2. Rainbow Trout
5.3. Tilapia
6. An Approach to the Functions of Microorganisms
7. Conclusions
8. Future Perspectives
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- FAO. The Future of Food and Agriculture Trends and Challenges. 2017. Available online: www.fao.org/publications (accessed on 3 March 2023).
- Lederberg, J.; Mccray, A.T. Ome SweetOmics—A Genealogical Treasury of Words. Scientist 2001, 15, 8. Available online: https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA73535513&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=08903670&p=AONE&sw=w (accessed on 12 July 2022).
- Berg, G.; Rybakova, D.; Fischer, D.; Cernava, T.; Vergès, M.-C.C.; Charles, T.; Chen, X.; Cocolin, L.; Eversole, K.; Corral, G.H.; et al. Microbiome definition re-visited: Old concepts and new challenges. Microbiome 2020, 8, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Taneja, V. Microbiome: Impact of Gender on Function & Characteristics of Gut Microbiome. In Principles of Gender-Specific Medicine: Gender in the Genomic Era, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2017; pp. 569–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marchesi, J.R.; Ravel, J. The vocabulary of microbiome research: A proposal. Microbiome 2015, 3, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peixoto, R.S.; Harkins, D.M.; Nelson, K.E. Advances in Microbiome Research for Animal Health. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2021, 9, 289–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirisinha, S. The potential impact of gut microbiota on your health: Current status and future challenges. Asian Pac. J. Allergy Immunol. 2016, 34, 249–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bešlo, D.; Došlić, G.; Agić, D.; Rastija, V.; Šperanda, M.; Gantner, V.; Lučić, B. Polyphenols in Ruminant Nutrition and Their Effects on Reproduction. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vasta, V.; Daghio, M.; Cappucci, A.; Buccioni, A.; Serra, A.; Viti, C.; Mele, M. Invited review: Plant polyphenols and rumen microbiota responsible for fatty acid biohydrogenation, fiber digestion, and methane emission: Experimental evidence and methodological approaches. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 3781–3804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tretola, M.; Silacci, P.; Sousa, R.; Colombo, F.; Panseri, S.; Ottoboni, M.; Pinotti, L.; Bee, G. Chestnut extracts decrease the in-vitro digestibility and polyphenol bioavailability of soy-based nutrients but protect the epithelial barrier function of pig jejunum segments after digestion. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2022, 294, 115501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jha, R.; Fouhse, J.M.; Tiwari, U.P.; Li, L.; Willing, B.P. Dietary Fiber and Intestinal Health of Monogastric Animals. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019, 6, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, R.K.; Chang, H.-W.; Yan, D.; Lee, K.M.; Ucmak, D.; Wong, K.; Abrouk, M.; Farahnik, B.; Nakamura, M.; Zhu, T.H.; et al. Influence of diet on the gut microbiome and implications for human health. J. Transl. Med. 2017, 15, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bik, H.M. Microbial Metazoa Are Microbes Too. Msystems 2019, 4, e00109-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Téllez, G.; Lauková, A.; Latorre, J.D.; Hernandez-Velasco, X.; Hargis, B.M.; Callaway, T. Food-producing animals and their health in relation to human health. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 2015, 26, 25876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ikeda-Ohtsubo, W.; Brugman, S.; Warden, C.H.; Rebel, J.M.J.; Folkerts, G.; Pieterse, C.M.J. How Can We Define “Optimal Microbiota?”: A Comparative Review of Structure and Functions of Microbiota of Animals, Fish, and Plants in Agriculture. Front. Nutr. 2018, 5, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vorste, R.V.; Sarremejane, R.; Datry, T. Intermittent Rivers and Ephemeral Streams: A Unique Biome with Important Contributions to Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. In Encyclopedia of the World’s Biomes; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Na Shi, N.; Na Li, N.; Duan, X.; Niu, H. Interaction between the gut microbiome and mucosal immune system. Mil. Med. Res. 2017, 4, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lange, M.; Lee, H.; Dallas, D.; Le Parc, A.; Bell, J.d.M.; Barile, D. Determining Functional Properties and Sources of Recently Identified Bioactive Food Components: Oligosaccharides, Glycolipids, Glycoproteins, and Peptides. Encycl. Agric. Food Syst. 2014, 441–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rinninella, E.; Raoul, P.; Cintoni, M.; Franceschi, F.; Miggiano, G.A.D.; Gasbarrini, A.; Mele, M.C. What Is the Healthy Gut Microbiota Composition? A Changing Ecosystem across Age, Environment, Diet, and Diseases. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Semenova, E.V.; Manzhurina, O.A.; Parkhomenko, Y.S. Review article: Key aspects of mammal microbiome development. Veter.-Sci. Today 2021, 1, 68–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeoman, C.J.; White, B.A. Gastrointestinal Tract Microbiota and Probiotics in Production Animals. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2014, 2, 469–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arshad, M.A.; Hassan, F.-U.; Rehman, M.S.; Huws, S.A.; Cheng, Y.; Din, A.U. Gut microbiome colonization and development in neonatal ruminants: Strategies, prospects, and opportunities. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 7, 883–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loor, J.J.; Elolimy, A.A. Immunometabolism in livestock: Triggers and physiological role of transcription regulators, nutrients, and microbiota. Anim. Front. 2022, 12, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkar, A.; Harty, S.; Johnson, K.V.-A.; Moeller, A.H.; Archie, E.A.; Schell, L.D.; Carmody, R.N.; Clutton-Brock, T.H.; Dunbar, R.I.M.; Burnet, P.W.J. Microbial transmission in animal social networks and the social microbiome. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 4, 1020–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Diaz, J.; Reese, A.T. Possibilities and limits for using the gut microbiome to improve captive animal health. Anim. Microbiome 2021, 3, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McKenzie, V.J.; Song, S.J.; Delsuc, F.; Prest, T.L.; Oliverio, A.M.; Korpita, T.M.; Alexiev, A.; Amato, K.R.; Metcalf, J.L.; Kowalewski, M.; et al. The Effects of Captivity on the Mammalian Gut Microbiome. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2017, 57, 690–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Attwood, G.T.; Wakelin, S.A.; Leahy, S.C.; Rowe, S.; Clarke, S.; Chapman, D.F.; Muirhead, R.; Jacobs, J.M.E. Applications of the Soil, Plant and Rumen Microbiomes in Pastoral Agriculture. Front. Nutr. 2019, 6, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, L.; Zhang, G.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y. Effects of High Forage/Concentrate Diet on Volatile Fatty Acid Production and the Microorganisms Involved in VFA Production in Cow Rumen. Animals 2020, 10, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xue, D.; Chen, H.; Luo, X.; Guan, J.; He, Y.; Zhao, X. Microbial diversity in the rumen, reticulum, omasum, and abomasum of yak on a rapid fattening regime in an agro-pastoral transition zone. J. Microbiol. 2018, 56, 734–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swanson, K.C. Small Intestinal Anatomy, Physiology, and Digestion in Ruminants. Ref. Modul. Food Sci. 2019, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Choudhury, P.K.; Carro, M.D.; Griffith, G.W.; Dagar, S.S.; Puniya, M.; Calabro, S.; Ravella, S.R.; Dhewa, T.; Upadhyay, R.C.; et al. New aspects and strategies for methane mitigation from ruminants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rojas-Downing, M.M.; Nejadhashemi, A.P.; Harrigan, T.; Woznicki, S.A. Climate change and livestock: Impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. Clim. Risk Manag. 2017, 16, 145–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kittelmann, S.; Pinares-Patiño, C.S.; Seedorf, H.; Kirk, M.R.; Ganesh, S.; McEwan, J.C.; Janssen, P.H. Two Different Bacterial Community Types Are Linked with the Low-Methane Emission Trait in Sheep. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e103171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramayo-Caldas, Y.; Zingaretti, L.; Popova, M.; Estellé, J.; Bernard, A.; Pons, N.; Bellot, P.; Mach, N.; Rau, A.; Roume, H.; et al. Identification of rumen microbial biomarkers linked to methane emission in Holstein dairy cows. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2020, 137, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Króliczewska, B.; Pecka-Kiełb, E.; Bujok, J. Strategies Used to Reduce Methane Emissions from Ruminants: Controversies and Issues. Agriculture 2023, 13, 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Millen, D.D.; Pacheco, R.D.L.; da Silva Cabral, L.; Cursino, L.L.; Watanabe, D.H.M.; Rigueiro, A.L.N. Ruminal acidosis. In Rmenology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 127–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valente, T.N.P.; Lima, E.S.; Santos, W.B.R.; Cesário, A.S.; Tavares, C.J.; Fernandes, Ã.L.; Freitas, M.A.M. Ruminal microorganism consideration and protein used in the metabolism of the ruminants: A review. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 10, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rinke, C.; Chuvochina, M.; Mussig, A.J.; Chaumeil, P.-A.; Davín, A.A.; Waite, D.W.; Whitman, W.B.; Parks, D.H.; Hugenholtz, P. A standardized archaeal taxonomy for the Genome Taxonomy Database. Nat. Microbiol. 2021, 6, 946–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greening, C.; Geier, R.; Wang, C.; Woods, L.C.; Morales, S.E.; McDonald, M.J.; Rushton-Green, R.; Morgan, X.C.; Koike, S.; Leahy, S.C.; et al. Diverse hydrogen production and consumption pathways influence methane production in ruminants. ISME J. 2019, 13, 2617–2632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choudhury, P.K.; Jena, R.; Tomar, S.K.; Puniya, A.K. Reducing Enteric Methanogenesis through Alternate Hydrogen Sinks in the Rumen. Methane 2022, 1, 320–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, C.; Thomas, B.J.; McEwan, N.R.; Stevens, P.R.; Creevey, C.; Huws, S.A. Rumen Protozoa Play a Significant Role in Fungal Predation and Plant Carbohydrate Breakdown. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elghandour, M.M.; Khusro, A.; Adegbeye, M.J.; Tan, Z.; Abu Hafsa, S.H.; Greiner, R.; Ugbogu, E.A.; Anele, U.Y.; Salem, A.Z.M. Dynamic role of single-celled fungi in ruminal microbial ecology and activities. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 128, 950–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Smith, S.B.; Gotoh, T.; Greenwood, P.L. Current situation and future prospects for global beef production: Overview of special issue. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 31, 927–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Livestock and Poultry: World Markets and Trade|USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. Available online: https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/livestock-and-poultry-world-markets-and-trade (accessed on 14 July 2022).
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2021–2030; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- USDA. Dairy Production and Trade Developments. 2021. Available online: https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/5t34sj56t?locale=en (accessed on 9 September 2022).
- Britt, J.H.; Cushman, R.A.; Dechow, C.D.; Dobson, H.; Humblot, P.; Hutjens, M.F.; Jones, G.A.; Ruegg, P.S.; Sheldon, I.M.; Stevenson, J.S. Invited review: Learning from the future—A vision for dairy farms and cows in 2067. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 3722–3741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mao, S.; Zhang, M.; Liu, J.; Zhu, W. Characterising the bacterial microbiota across the gastrointestinal tracts of dairy cattle: Membership and potential function. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peng, S.; Yin, J.; Liu, X.; Jia, B.; Chang, Z.; Lu, H.; Jiang, N.; Chen, Q. First insights into the microbial diversity in the omasum and reticulum of bovine using Illumina sequencing. J. Appl. Genet. 2015, 56, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L. The Effects of Different Concentrate-to-Forage Ratio Diets on Rumen Bacterial Microbiota and the Structures of Holstein Cows during the Feeding Cycle. Animals 2020, 10, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chaves Lopez, C.; Serio, A.; Rossi, C.; Mazzarrino, G.; Marchetti, S.; Castellani, F.; Grotta, L.; Fiorentino, F.P.; Paparella, A.; Martino, G. Effect of diet supplementation with Ascophyllum nodosum on cow milk composition and microbiota. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 6285–6297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Farid, F.; Sideeq, O.; Khan, F.; Niaz, K. Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In Nonvitamin and Nonmineral Nutritional Supplements; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 501–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trilokesh, C.; Uppuluri, K.B. Biobutanol from lignocellulosic biomass and microalgae: Scope, technology, and economics. In Sustainable Biofuels; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2021; pp. 163–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, W.; Wei, Z.; Xu, N.; Yang, F.; Yoon, I.; Chung, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, J. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products on performance and rumen fermentation and microbiota in dairy cows fed a diet containing low quality forage. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 8, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grgic, D.; Varga, E.; Novak, B.; Müller, A.; Marko, D. Isoflavones in animals: Metabolism and effects in livestock and occurrence in feed. Toxins 2021, 13, 836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kasparovska, J.; Pecinkova, M.; Dadakova, K.; Krizova, L.; Hadrova, S.; Lexa, M.; Lochman, J.; Kasparovsky, T. Effects of Isoflavone-Enriched Feed on the Rumen Microbiota in Dairy Cows. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Du, E.; Guo, W.; Zhao, N.; Chen, F.; Fan, Q.; Zhang, W.; Huang, S.; Zhou, G.; Fu, T.; Wei, J. Effects of diets with various levels of forage rape (Brassi canapus) on growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality and rumen microbiota of Hu lambs. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 1281–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoshimura, E.; Santos, N.; Machado, E.; Agustinho, B.; Pereira, L.; de Aguiar, S.; Franzolin, R.; Gasparino, E.; dos Santos, G.; Zeoula, L. Effects of dairy cow diets supplied with flaxseed oil and propolis extract, with or without vitamin E, on the ruminal microbiota, biohydrogenation, and digestion. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2018, 241, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morris, S.T. Overview of sheep production systems. In Advances in Sheep Welfare; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2017; pp. 19–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Fan, H.; Han, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhou, Z. Characterization of the microbial communities along the gastrointestinal tract of sheep by 454 pyrosequencing analysis. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 30, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zeng, Y.; Zeng, D.; Ni, X.; Zhu, H.; Jian, P.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, S.; Lin, Y.; Li, Y.; Yin, Z.; et al. Microbial community compositions in the gastrointestinal tract of Chinese Mongolian sheep using Illumina MiSeq sequencing revealed high microbial diversity. AMB Express 2017, 7, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, S.; You, S.; Sun, L.; Wang, X.; Jia, Y.; Zhou, Y. Effects of Replacing Alfalfa Hay With Native Grass Hay in Pelleted Total Mixed Ration on Physicochemical Parameters, Fatty Acid Profile, and Rumen Microbiota in Lamb. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 861025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Friedt, W.; Tu, J.; Fu, T. Academic and Economic Importance of Brassica Napus Rapeseed. In The Brassica Napus Genome; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.X.; Li, Q.; Zhang, R.X.; Liu, W.Z.; Ren, Y.S.; Zhang, C.X.; Zhang, J.X. Effect of dietary grape pomace on growth performance, meat quality and antioxidant activity in ram lambs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2018, 236, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kafantaris, I.; Kotsampasi, B.; Christodoulou, V.; Kokka, E.; Kouka, P.; Terzopoulou, Z.; Gerasopoulos, K.; Stagos, D.; Mitsagga, C.; Giavasis, I.; et al. Grape pomace improves antioxidant capacity and faecal microflora of lambs. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2017, 101, e108–e121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J.; Kim, I. Effects of dietary Achyranthes japonica extract supplementation on the growth performance, total tract digestibility, cecal microflora, excreta noxious gas emission, and meat quality of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, X.; Cui, K.; Qi, M.; Wang, S.; Diao, Q.; Zhang, N. Ruminal Microbiota and Fermentation in Response to Dietary Protein and Energy Levels in Weaned Lambs. Animals 2020, 10, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenhalgh, S.; Chrystal, P.V.; Selle, P.H.; Liu, S.Y. Reduced-crude protein diets in chicken-meat production: Justification for an imperative. World Poult. Sci. J. 2020, 76, 537–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Wang, G.; Cai, S.; Zeng, X.; Qiao, S. Advances in low-protein diets for swine. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 9, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gebeyew, K.; Yang, C.; He, Z.; Tan, Z. Low-protein diets supplemented with methionine and lysine alter the gut microbiota composition and improve the immune status of growing lambs. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 8393–8410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Webb, E. Goat meat production, composition, and quality. Anim. Front. 2014, 4, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazhangara, I.R.; Chivandi, E.; Mupangwa, J.F.; Muchenje, V. The Potential of Goat Meat in the Red Meat Industry. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerra, V.; Tiago, I.; Aires, A.; Coelho, C.; Nunes, J.; Martins, L.O.; Veríssimo, A. The gastrointestinal microbiome of browsing goats (Capra hircus). PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0276262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Jin, L.; Xue, B.; Wang, Z.; Peng, Q. Characterizing the bacterial community across the gastrointestinal tract of goats: Composition and potential function. Microbiologyopen 2019, 8, e00820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lei, Y.; Zhang, K.; Guo, M.; Li, G.; Li, C.; Li, B.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X. Exploring the Spatial-Temporal Microbiota of Compound Stomachs in a Pre-Weaned Goat Model. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lock, A.L.; O’Donnell-Megaro, A.M.; Bauman, D.E. Conjugated Linoleic Acid. In Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2021; pp. 798–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín, R.; Langella, P. Emerging Health Concepts in the Probiotics Field: Streamlining the Definitions. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cremonesi, P.; Conte, G.; Severgnini, M.; Turri, F.; Monni, A.; Capra, E.; Rapetti, L.; Colombini, S.; Chessa, S.; Battelli, G.; et al. Evaluation of the effects of different diets on microbiome diversity and fatty acid composition of rumen liquor in dairy goat. Animal 2018, 12, 1856–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mussard, E.; Jousselin, S.; Cesaro, A.; Legrain, B.; Lespessailles, E.; Esteve, E.; Berteina-Raboin, S.; Toumi, H. Andrographis paniculata and Its Bioactive Diterpenoids against Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Keratinocytes. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yusuf, A.L.; Adeyemi, K.D.; Samsudin, A.A.; Goh, Y.M.; Alimon, A.R.; Sazili, A.Q. Effects of dietary supplementation of leaves and whole plant of Andrographis paniculata on rumen fermentation, fatty acid composition and microbiota in goats. BMC Veter.-Res. 2017, 13, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, L.; Wang, D.; Hu, H.; Zhou, H. Effects of Piper sarmentosum extract supplementation on growth performances and rumen fermentation and microflora characteristics in goats. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 104, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; Peng, X.; Lv, F.; Zheng, M.; Long, D.; Mao, H.; Si, H.; Zhang, P. Microbiome-Metabolites Analysis Reveals Unhealthy Alterations in the Gut Microbiota but Improved Meat Quality with a High-Rice Diet Challenge in a Small Ruminant Model. Animals 2021, 11, 2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayyat, M.S.; Al-Sagheer, A.; Noreldin, A.E.; El-Hack, M.E.A.; Khafaga, A.F.; Abdel-Latif, M.A.; Swelum, A.A.; Arif, M.; Salem, A.Z.M. Beneficial effects of rumen-protected methionine on nitrogen-use efficiency, histological parameters, productivity and reproductive performance of ruminants. Anim. Biotechnol. 2019, 32, 51–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, D.; Yan, J.; Shen, W.; Song, Y.; Lan, X.; Yi, K.; Muhammad, A.U.R. Effect of inclusion of HMBi in the ration of goats on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, rumen bacteria community and blood serum parameters. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 104, 987–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobayashi, R.; Nagaoka, K.; Nishimura, N.; Koike, S.; Takahashi, E.; Niimi, K.; Murase, H.; Kinjo, T.; Tsukahara, T.; Inoue, R. Comparison of the fecal microbiota of two monogastric herbivorous and five omnivorous mammals. Anim. Sci. J. 2020, 91, e13366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- He, Y.; Maltecca, C.; Tiezzi, F. Potential Use of Gut Microbiota Composition as a Biomarker of Heat Stress in Monogastric Species: A Review. Animals 2021, 11, 1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, S.; Luo, S.; Yan, C. Gut Microbiota Implications for Health and Welfare in Farm Animals: A Review. Animals 2021, 12, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López-Andrés, J.J.; Aguilar-Lasserre, A.A.; Morales-Mendoza, L.F.; Azzaro-Pantel, C.; Pérez-Gallardo, J.R.; Rico-Contreras, J.O. Environmental impact assessment of chicken meat production via an integrated methodology based on LCA, simulation and genetic algorithms. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 174, 477–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Svihus, B. Function of the digestive system. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2014, 23, 306–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kırkpınar, F.; Açıkgöz, Z. Feeding. In Animal Husbandry and Nutrition; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denbow, D.M. Gastrointestinal Anatomy and Physiology. In Sturkie’s Avian Physiology, 6th ed.; Scanes, C.G., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2015; pp. 337–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Q.; Lan, F.; Li, X.; Yan, W.; Sun, C.; Li, J.; Yang, N.; Wen, C. The Spatial and Temporal Characterization of Gut Microbiota in Broilers. Front. Veter.-Sci. 2021, 8, 712226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stamilla, A.; Ruiz-Ruiz, S.; Artacho, A.; Pons, J.; Messina, A.; Randazzo, C.L.; Caggia, C.; Lanza, M.; Moya, A. Analysis of the Microbial Intestinal Tract in Broiler Chickens during the Rearing Period. Biology 2021, 10, 942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, X.; Lee, S.I.; Kim, I.H. Achyranthes japonica extracts supplementation to growing pigs positively influences growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal microbial shedding, and fecal gas emission. Anim. Biosci. 2021, 34, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu Hafsa, S.H.; Ibrahim, S.A. Effect of dietary polyphenol-rich grape seed on growth performance, antioxidant capacity and ileal microflora in broiler chicks. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2017, 102, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rumbos, C.I.; Karapanagiotidis, I.T.; Mente, E.; Psofakis, P.; Athanassiou, C.G. Evaluation of various commodities for the development of the yellow mealworm, Tenebrio molitor. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 11224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Petry, A.L.; Patience, J.F. Xylanase supplementation in corn-based swine diets: A review with emphasis on potential mechanisms of action. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 98, skaa318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kubiś, M.; Kołodziejski, P.; Pruszyńska-Oszmałek, E.; Sassek, M.; Konieczka, P.; Górka, P.; Flaga, J.; Katarzyńska-Banasik, D.; Hejdysz, M.; Wiśniewska, Z.; et al. Emulsifier and Xylanase Can Modulate the Gut Microbiota Activity of Broiler Chickens. Animals 2020, 10, 2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Delbeke, E.I.; Van Geem, K.M.; Stevens, C.V.; Van Bogaert, I.N. Sophorolipid Modification: The Power of Yeasts and Enzymes. In Lipid Modification by Enzymes and Engineered Microbes; AOCS Press: Champaign, IL, USA, 2018; pp. 315–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwak, M.-J.; Park, M.-Y.; Choi, Y.-S.; Cho, J.; Pathiraja, D.; Kim, J.; Lee, H.; Choi, I.-G.; Whang, K.-Y. Dietary sophorolipid accelerates growth by modulation of gut microbiota population and intestinal environments in broiler chickens. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 12, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2022–2031; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonzalez, L.M.; Moeser, A.J.; Blikslager, A.T. Porcine models of digestive disease: The future of large animal translational research. Transl. Res. 2015, 166, 12–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, J.; Chen, L.; Tang, Y.; Xie, C.; Xu, B.; Shi, M.; Zheng, W.; Zhou, S.; Wang, X.; Liu, L.; et al. Standardized Preparation for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Pigs. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pabst, R. The pig as a model for immunology research. Cell Tissue Res. 2020, 380, 287–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thomson, J.R.; Friendship, R.M. Digestive System. In Diseases of Swine; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 234–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holman, D.; Brunelle, B.W.; Trachsel, J.; Allen, H.K. Meta-analysis To Define a Core Microbiota in the Swine Gut. Msystems 2017, 2, e00004-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, D.L.; Cross, P.; Withers, P.J.A.; DeLuca, T.H.; Robinson, D.A.; Quilliam, R.S.; Harris, I.M.; Chadwick, D.R.; Edwards-Jones, G. REVIEW: Nutrient stripping: The global disparity between food security and soil nutrient stocks. J. Appl. Ecol. 2013, 50, 851–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinotti, L.; Giromini, C.; Ottoboni, M.; Tretola, M.; Marchis, D. Review: Insects and former foodstuffs for upgrading food waste biomasses/streams to feed ingredients for farm animals. Animal 2019, 13, 1365–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tretola, M.; Luciano, A.; Ottoboni, M.; Baldi, A.; Pinotti, L. Influence of Traditional vs. Alternative Dietary Carbohydrates Sources on the Large Intestinal Microbiota in Post-Weaning Piglets. Animals 2019, 9, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grosu, I.A.; Pistol, G.C.; Taranu, I.; Marin, D.E. The Impact of Dietary Grape Seed Meal on Healthy and Aflatoxin B1 Afflicted Microbiota of Pigs after Weaning. Toxins 2019, 11, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Cao, S.; Shen, Z.; Hong, Q.; Feng, J.; Peng, Y.; Hu, C. Effects of dietary tributyrin on intestinal mucosa development, mitochondrial function and AMPK-mTOR pathway in weaned pigs. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 10, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Q.; Yin, F.; Li, B.; Guo, Y.; Yin, Y. Dietary Tributyrin Administration Improves Intestinal Morphology and Selected Bacterial and Short-Chain Fatty Acid Profiles in Broilers Under an Isocaloric Feeding Regime. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 715712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, W.; Sun, J.; Li, M.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, X.; Tang, Z.; Chen, J.; Zhen, J.; Sun, Z. The effects of dietary sodium butyrate supplementation on the growth performance, carcass traits and intestinal microbiota of growing-finishing pigs. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 128, 1613–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, C.; Shen, Z.; Cao, S.; Zhang, Q.; Peng, Y.; Hong, Q.; Feng, J.; Hu, C. Effects of tributyrin on growth performance, intestinal microflora and barrier function of weaned pigs. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2019, 258, 114311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konuray, G.; Erginkaya, Z. Potential Use of Bacillus coagulans in the Food Industry. Foods 2018, 7, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kiarie, E.G.; Leung, H.; Kakhki, R.A.M.; Patterson, R.; Barta, J.R. Utility of Feed Enzymes and Yeast Derivatives in Ameliorating Deleterious Effects of Coccidiosis on Intestinal Health and Function in Broiler Chickens. Front. Veter.-Sci. 2019, 6, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fu, R.; Chen, D.; Tian, G.; Zheng, P.; Mao, X.; Yu, J.; He, J.; Huang, Z.; Luo, Y.; Yu, B. Effect of dietary supplementation of Bacillus coagulans or yeast hydrolysates on growth performance, antioxidant activity, cytokines and intestinal microflora of growing-finishing pigs. Anim. Nutr. 2019, 5, 366–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, L.; Zhang, L.; Duan, H.; Zhao, R.; Xiao, Y.; Guo, M.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Chen, W.; Tian, F. The Protection of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum CCFM8661 Against Benzopyrene-Induced Toxicity via Regulation of the Gut Microbiota. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 736129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, D.; Chang, S.Y.; Bogere, P.; Won, K.; Choi, J.-Y.; Choi, Y.-J.; Lee, H.K.; Hur, J.; Park, B.-Y.; Kim, Y.; et al. Beneficial roles of probiotics on the modulation of gut microbiota and immune response in pigs. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0220843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maulu, S.; Nawanzi, K.; Abdel-Tawwab, M.; Khalil, H.S. Fish Nutritional Value as an Approach to Children’s Nutrition. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalili Tilami, S.; Sampels, S. Nutritional Value of Fish: Lipids, Proteins, Vitamins, and Minerals. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 2018, 26, 243–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAO. World Food and Agriculture—Statistical Yearbook 2020; FAO-Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nation: Rome, Italy, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merrifield, D.L.; Rodiles, A. 10–The fish microbiome and its interactions with mucosal tissues. In Mucosal Health in Aquaculture; Beck, B.H., Peatman, E., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; pp. 273–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Egerton, S.; Culloty, S.; Whooley, J.; Stanton, C.; Ross, R.P. The Gut Microbiota of Marine Fish. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, Y.; Ding, L.; Huang, Z.; Xu, H.; Xu, Z. Commensal bacteria-immunity crosstalk shapes mucosal homeostasis in teleost fish. Rev. Aquac. 2021, 13, 2322–2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Optimism Persists in Farmed Salmon Sector Despite Price Lull|GLOBEFISH|Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: https://www.fao.org/in-action/globefish/marketreports/resource-detail/es/c/1263849/ (accessed on 20 July 2022).
- Navarrete, P.; Espejo, R.T.; Romero, J. Molecular Analysis of Microbiota along the Digestive Tract of Juvenile Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar L.). Microb. Ecol. 2009, 57, 550–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmidt, V.; Amaral-Zettler, L.; Davidson, J.; Summerfelt, S.; Good, C. Influence of Fishmeal-Free Diets on Microbial Communities in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) Recirculation Aquaculture Systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 4470–4481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gajardo, K.; Rodiles, A.; Kortner, T.M.; Krogdahl, Å.; Bakke, A.M.; Merrifield, D.L.; Sørum, H. A high-resolution map of the gut microbiota in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): A basis for comparative gut microbial research. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Onwezen, M.C.; van den Puttelaar, J.; Verain, M.C.D.; Veldkamp, T. Consumer acceptance of insects as food and feed: The relevance of affective factors. Food Qual. Prefer. 2019, 77, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Bruni, L.; Jaramillo-Torres, A.; Gajardo, K.; Kortner, T.M.; Krogdahl, Å. Differential response of digesta- and mucosa-associated intestinal microbiota to dietary insect meal during the seawater phase of Atlantic salmon. Anim. Microbiome 2021, 3, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Krogdahl, Å.; Penn, M.; Thorsen, J.; Refstie, S.; Bakke, A.M. Important antinutrients in plant feedstuffs for aquaculture: An update on recent findings regarding responses in salmonids. Aquac. Res. 2010, 41, 333–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Catalán, N.; Villasante, A.; Wacyk, J.; Ramírez, C.; Romero, J. Fermented Soybean Meal Increases Lactic Acid Bacteria in Gut Microbiota of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar). Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2018, 10, 566–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Villasante, A.; Ramírez, C.; Catalán, N.; Opazo, R.; Dantagnan, P.; Romero, J. Effect of Dietary Carbohydrate-to-Protein Ratio on Gut Microbiota in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar). Animals 2019, 9, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Verdile, N.; Pasquariello, R.; Scolari, M.; Scirè, G.; Brevini, T.A.L.; Gandolfi, F. A Detailed Study of Rainbow Trout (Onchorhynchus mykiss) Intestine Revealed That Digestive and Absorptive Functions Are Not Linearly Distributed along Its Length. Animals 2020, 10, 745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Felice, E.; Palladino, A.; Tardella, F.M.; Giaquinto, D.; Barone, C.M.A.; Crasto, A.; Scocco, P. A morphological, glycohistochemical and ultrastructural study on the stomach of adult Rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Eur. Zool. J. 2021, 88, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyons, P.P.; Turnbull, J.; Dawson, K.A.; Crumlish, M. Exploring the microbial diversity of the distal intestinal lumen and mucosa of farmed rainbow troutOncorhynchus mykiss(Walbaum) using next generation sequencing (NGS). Aquac. Res. 2015, 48, 77–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rimoldi, S.; Antonini, M.; Gasco, L.; Moroni, F.; Terova, G. Intestinal microbial communities of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) may be improved by feeding a Hermetia illucens meal/low-fishmeal diet. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 47, 365–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wong, S.; Waldrop, T.; Summerfelt, S.; Davidson, J.; Barrows, F.; Kenney, P.B.; Welch, T.; Wiens, G.D.; Snekvik, K.; Rawls, J.F.; et al. Aquacultured Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Possess a Large Core Intestinal Microbiota That Is Resistant to Variation in Diet and Rearing Density. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 4974–4984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gasco, L.; Biasato, I.; Dabbou, S.; Schiavone, A.; Gai, F. Animals Fed Insect-Based Diets: State-of-the-Art on Digestibility, Performance and Product Quality. Animals 2019, 9, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terova, G.; Rimoldi, S.; Ascione, C.; Gini, E.; Ceccotti, C.; Gasco, L. Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) gut microbiota is modulated by insect meal from Hermetia illucens prepupae in the diet. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2019, 29, 465–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikołajczak, Z.; Rawski, M.; Mazurkiewicz, J.; Kierończyk, B.; Józefiak, D. The Effect of Hydrolyzed Insect Meals in Sea Trout Fingerling (Salmo trutta m. trutta) Diets on Growth Performance, Microbiota and Biochemical Blood Parameters. Animals 2020, 10, 1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antoniussen, C.S.; Rasmussen, H.H.; Holst, M.; Lauridsen, C. Reducing Disease Activity of Inflammatory Bowel Disease by Consumption of Plant-Based Foods and Nutrients. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 733433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karapanagiotidis, I.T.; Psofakis, P.; Mente, E.; Malandrakis, E.; Golomazou, E. Effect of fishmeal replacement by poultry by-product meal on growth performance, proximate composition, digestive enzyme activity, haematological parameters and gene expression of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). Aquac. Nutr. 2019, 25, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaudioso, G.; Marzorati, G.; Faccenda, F.; Weil, T.; Lunelli, F.; Cardinaletti, G.; Marino, G.; Olivotto, I.; Parisi, G.; Tibaldi, E.; et al. Processed Animal Proteins from Insect and Poultry By-Products in a Fish Meal-Free Diet for Rainbow Trout: Impact on Intestinal Microbiota and Inflammatory Markers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, F.; Liu, F.; Wang, X.; Chen, W.; Meng, X. Transcriptomic responses to yam (Dioscorea oppositifolia L.) extract dietary supplementation in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) liver. Aquac. Res. 2019, 51, 932–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, F.; Liu, H.; Liu, F.; Chen, W. Effects of Chinese yam (Dioscorea oppositifolia L.) dietary supplementation on intestinal microflora, digestive enzyme activity and immunity in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquac. Res. 2020, 51, 4698–4712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prabu, E.; Rajagopalsamy, C.; Ahilan, B.; Jeevagan, I.; Renuhadevi, M. Tilapia—An excellent candidate species for world aquaculture: A review. Annu. Res. Rev. Biol. 2019, 31, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsegay, T.; Natarajan, P.; Zelealem, T. Analysis of Diet and Biochemical Composition of Nile Tilapia (O. niloticus) from Tekeze Reservoir and Lake Hashenge, Ethiopia. J. Fish. Livest. Prod. 2016, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phrompanya, P.; Saenphet, K.; Saenphet, S. Comparative histochemical study of the gastrointestinal tracts of the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and the hybrid catfish (Clarias batrachus × Clarias gariepinus). Acta Histochem. 2019, 121, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Fan, Z.; Yi, M.; Liu, Z.; Ke, X.; Gao, F.; Cao, J.; Wang, M.; Chen, G.; Lu, M. Characterization of the core gut microbiota of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): Indication of a putative novel Cetobacterium species and analysis of its potential function on nutrition. Arch. Microbiol. 2022, 204, 690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bereded, N.K.; Curto, M.; Domig, K.J.; Abebe, G.B.; Fanta, S.W.; Waidbacher, H.; Meimberg, H. Metabarcoding Analyses of Gut Microbiota of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) from Lake Awassa and Lake Chamo, Ethiopia. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zaefarian, A.; Yeganeh, S.; Adhami, B. Dietary effects of garlic powder (Allium sativum) on growth, blood indices, carcass composition, and lysozyme activity in brown trout (Salmo caspius) and resistance against Yersinia ruckeri infection. Aquac. Int. 2017, 25, 1987–1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zare, M.; Tran, H.Q.; Prokešová, M.; Stejskal, V. Effects of Garlic Allium sativum Powder on Nutrient Digestibility, Haematology, and Immune and Stress Responses in Eurasian Perch Perca fluviatilis Juveniles. Animals 2021, 11, 2735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osman, K.M.; Al-Maary, K.S.; Mubarak, A.S.; Dawoud, T.M.; Moussa, I.M.I.; Ibrahim, M.D.S.; Hessain, A.M.; Orabi, A.; Fawzy, N.M. Characterization and susceptibility of streptococci and enterococci isolated from Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) showing septicaemia in aquaculture and wild sites in Egypt. BMC Veter.-Res. 2017, 13, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foysal, J.; Alam, M.; Momtaz, F.; Chaklader, R.; Siddik, M.A.B.; Cole, A.; Fotedar, R.; Rahman, M. Dietary supplementation of garlic (Allium sativum) modulates gut microbiota and health status of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) against Streptococcus iniae infection. Aquac. Res. 2019, 50, 2107–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Zhou, Y.; Ling, H.; Luo, L.; Qi, D.; Feng, L. The effect of dietary supplementation with Clostridium butyricum on the growth performance, immunity, intestinal microbiota and disease resistance of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0223428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fomina, M.; Skorochod, I. Microbial interaction with clay minerals and its environmental and biotechnological implications. Minerals 2020, 10, 861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassaan, M.S.; Mohammady, E.Y.; Soaudy, M.R.; Palma, J.; Shawer, E.E.; El-Haroun, E. The effect of dietary sericite on growth performance, digestive enzymes activity, gut microbiota and haematological parameters of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.) fingerlings. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2020, 262, 114400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, E.L.; Heaver, S.L.; Walters, W.A.; Ley, R.E. Microbiome and metabolic disease: Revisiting the bacterial phylum Bacteroidetes. J. Mol. Med. 2017, 95, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Margolis, E.; Fredricks, D.N. Bacterial Vaginosis-Associated Bacteria. In Molecular Medical Microbiology, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2015; pp. 1487–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iljazovic, A.; Roy, U.; Gálvez, E.J.C.; Lesker, T.R.; Zhao, B.; Gronow, A.; Amend, L.; Will, S.E.; Hofmann, J.D.; Pils, M.C.; et al. Perturbation of the gut microbiome by Prevotella spp. enhances host susceptibility to mucosal inflammation. Mucosal Immunol. 2021, 14, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pacífico, C.; Petri, R.M.; Ricci, S.; Mickdam, E.; Wetzels, S.U.; Neubauer, V.; Zebeli, Q. Unveiling the Bovine Epimural Microbiota Composition and Putative Function. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.; Elekwachi, C.O.; Bai, S.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, K.; Forster, R.J. Characterizing the Alteration in Rumen Microbiome and Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes Profile with Forage of Muskoxen Rumen through Comparative Metatranscriptomics. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cancino-Padilla, N.; Catalán, N.; Siu-Ting, K.; Creevey, C.J.; Huws, S.A.; Romero, J.; Vargas-Bello-Pérez, E. Long-Term Effects of Dietary Supplementation with Olive Oil and Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil on the Rumen Microbiome of Dairy Cows. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, S.; Cheng, H.; Wyckoff, K.N.; He, Q. Linkages of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes populations to methanogenic process performance. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 43, 771–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.-J.; Kim, D.; Kim, K.-W.; Lee, S.-H.; Jang, A. Comparative analysis of the gut microbiota of mice fed a diet supplemented with raw and cooked beef loin powder. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 11489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Artzi, L.; Bayer, E.A.; Morais, S. Cellulosomes: Bacterial nanomachines for dismantling plant polysaccharides. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2016, 15, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brulc, J.M.; Yeoman, C.J.; Wilson, M.K.; Miller, M.E.B.; Jeraldo, P.; Jindou, S.; Goldenfeld, N.; Flint, H.J.; Lamed, R.; Borovok, I.; et al. Cellulosomics, a Gene-Centric Approach to Investigating the Intraspecific Diversity and Adaptation of Ruminococcus flavefaciens within the Rumen. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e25329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Othman, L.; Sleiman, A.; Abdel-Massih, R.M. Antimicrobial Activity of Polyphenols and Alkaloids in Middle Eastern Plants. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palevich, N.; Kelly, W.J.; Leahy, S.C.; Denman, S.; Altermann, E.; Rakonjac, J.; Attwood, G.T. Comparative genomics of rumen Butyrivibrio spp. uncovers a continuum of polysaccharide-degrading capabilities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e01993-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B.; Luo, H. Effects of mulberry leaf silage on antioxidant and immunomodulatory activity and rumen bacterial community of lambs. BMC Microbiol. 2021, 21, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Uwamahoro, H.P.; Li, F.; Timilsina, A.; Liu, B.; Wang, X.; Tian, Y. An Assessment of the Lactic Acid-Producing Potential of Bacterial Strains Isolated from Food Waste. Microbiol. Res. 2022, 13, 278–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Meng, Q.; Chen, Y.; Xu, M.; Shen, M.; Gao, R.; Gan, S. Role of Age-Related Shifts in Rumen Bacteria and Methanogens in Methane Production in Cattle. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kong, F.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, W.; Yang, H.; Lu, N.; Li, S. Nutrient Digestibility, Microbial Fermentation, and Response in Bacterial Composition to Methionine Dipeptide: An In Vitro Study. Biology 2022, 11, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dorantes-Iturbide, G.; Orzuna-Orzuna, J.F.; Lara-Bueno, A.; Mendoza-Martínez, G.D.; Miranda-Romero, L.A.; Lee-Rangel, H.A. Essential Oils as a Dietary Additive for Small Ruminants: A Meta-Analysis on Performance, Rumen Parameters, Serum Metabolites, and Product Quality. Veter. Sci. 2022, 9, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Binda, C.; Lopetuso, L.R.; Rizzatti, G.; Gibiino, G.; Cennamo, V.; Gasbarrini, A. Actinobacteria: A relevant minority for the maintenance of gut homeostasis. Dig. Liver Dis. 2018, 50, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Bergeijk, D.A.; Terlouw, B.R.; Medema, M.H.; van Wezel, G.P. Ecology and genomics of Actinobacteria: New concepts for natural product discovery. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2020, 18, 546–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moraïs, S.; Mizrahi, I. The Road Not Taken: The Rumen Microbiome, Functional Groups, and Community States. Trends Microbiol. 2019, 27, 538–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiao, J.; Alugongo, G.M.; Ji, S.; Wu, Z.; Dong, S.; Li, S.; Yoon, I.; Chung, R.; Cao, Z. Effects of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Fermentation Products on the Microbial Community throughout the Gastrointestinal Tract of Calves. Animals 2018, 9, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priyoatmojo, D.; Maharani, Y.; Ansori, D.; Hardani, S.N.W.; Trinugraha, A.C.; Handayani, T.; Sasongko, W.T.; Wahyono, T. Effects of Harvesting Time on Tannin Biological Activity in Sambiloto (Andrographis paniculata) Leaves and in vitro Diet Digestibility Supplemented with Sambiloto Leaves. J. Anim. Health Prod. 2021, 9, 425–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gungor, E.; Altop, A.; Erener, G. Effect of raw and fermented grape seed on growth performance, antioxidant capacity, and cecal microflora in broiler chickens. Animal 2021, 15, 100194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amat, S.; Lantz, H.; Munyaka, P.M.; Willing, B.P. Prevotella in Pigs: The Positive and Negative Associations with Production and Health. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernad-Roche, M.; Bellés, A.; Grasa, L.; Casanova-Higes, A.; Mainar-Jaime, R.C. Effects of Dietary Supplementation with Protected Sodium Butyrate on Gut Microbiota in Growing-Finishing Pigs. Animals 2021, 11, 2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, W.; Xiao, Z.; An, W.; Dong, Y.; Zhang, B. Dietary sodium butyrate improves intestinal development and function by modulating the microbial community in broilers. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0197762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sotira, S.; Dell’anno, M.; Caprarulo, V.; Hejna, M.; Pirrone, F.; Callegari, M.L.; Tucci, T.V.; Rossi, L. Effects of Tributyrin Supplementation on Growth Performance, Insulin, Blood Metabolites and Gut Microbiota in Weaned Piglets. Animals 2020, 10, 726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Villasante, A.; Ramírez, C.; Rodríguez, H.; Dantagnan, P.; Hernández, A.; Figueroa, E.; Romero, J. Dietary carbohydrate-to-protein ratio influences growth performance, hepatic health and dynamic of gut microbiota in atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Anim. Nutr. 2022, 10, 261–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- He, C.; Lei, J.; Yao, Y.; Qu, X.; Chen, J.; Xie, K.; Wang, X.; Yi, Q.; Xiao, B.; Guo, S.; et al. Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) Larvae Meal Modulates Intestinal Morphology and Microbiota in Xuefeng Black-Bone Chickens. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 706424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, M.; Li, Z.; Chen, W.; Rong, T.; Wang, G.; Ma, X. Hermetia illucens larvae as a potential dietary protein source altered the microbiota and modulated mucosal immune status in the colon of finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 10, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rimoldi, S.; Gini, E.; Iannini, F.; Gasco, L.; Terova, G. The Effects of Dietary Insect Meal from Hermetia illucens Prepupae on Autochthonous Gut Microbiota of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Animals 2019, 9, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farris, N.W.; Hamidoghli, A.; Bae, J.; Won, S.; Choi, W.; Biró, J.; Lee, S.; Bai, S.C. Dietary Supplementation with γ-Aminobutyric Acid Improves Growth, Digestive Enzyme Activity, Non-Specific Immunity and Disease Resistance against Streptococcus iniae in Juvenile Olive Flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Animals 2022, 12, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, D.-Y.; Lee, C.-H.; Kim, K.-D.; Lim, H.J.; Kim, H.S. Effects of diet supplementation with plant juice processing by-products on juvenile black rockfish (Sebastes schlegelii) growth performance, feed utilization, non-specific immunity, and disease resistance against Vibrio harveyi. Aquac. Rep. 2021, 21, 100831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Huaiquipán, R.; Quiñones, J.; Díaz, R.; Velásquez, C.; Sepúlveda, G.; Velázquez, L.; Paz, E.A.; Tapia, D.; Cancino, D.; Sepúlveda, N. Review: Effect of Experimental Diets on the Microbiome of Productive Animals. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2219. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092219
Huaiquipán R, Quiñones J, Díaz R, Velásquez C, Sepúlveda G, Velázquez L, Paz EA, Tapia D, Cancino D, Sepúlveda N. Review: Effect of Experimental Diets on the Microbiome of Productive Animals. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(9):2219. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092219
Chicago/Turabian StyleHuaiquipán, Rodrigo, John Quiñones, Rommy Díaz, Carla Velásquez, Gastón Sepúlveda, Lidiana Velázquez, Erwin A. Paz, Daniela Tapia, David Cancino, and Néstor Sepúlveda. 2023. "Review: Effect of Experimental Diets on the Microbiome of Productive Animals" Microorganisms 11, no. 9: 2219. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092219
APA StyleHuaiquipán, R., Quiñones, J., Díaz, R., Velásquez, C., Sepúlveda, G., Velázquez, L., Paz, E. A., Tapia, D., Cancino, D., & Sepúlveda, N. (2023). Review: Effect of Experimental Diets on the Microbiome of Productive Animals. Microorganisms, 11(9), 2219. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092219