Next Article in Journal
Enrichment of Aquatic Xylan-Degrading Microbial Communities
Previous Article in Journal
Neurological Impact of Respiratory Viruses: Insights into Glial Cell Responses in the Central Nervous System
Previous Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Assay Using Proboscidea parviflora W. and Phaseolus lunatus L. Plant Extracts to Control Pythium amazonianum
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/microorganisms12081714
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Etiology of Foliar Blight of Indian Paintbrush (Castilleja tenuiflora) in Mexico

by
Alma Rosa Solano-Báez
1,
Gabriela Trejo-Tapia
1,
Miroslav Kolařík
2,
Jossue Ortiz-Álvarez
3,
José Luis Trejo-Espino
1 and
Guillermo Márquez-Licona
2,*
1
Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro de Desarrollo de Productos Bióticos, Yautepec 62731, Morelos, Mexico
2
Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-142 20 Prague, Czech Republic
3
Research Program: “Investigadoras e Investigadores por México” Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias, Tecnologías e Innovación (CONAHCyT), Ciudad de México 03940, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2024, 12(8), 1714; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12081714
Submission received: 20 July 2024 / Revised: 16 August 2024 / Accepted: 17 August 2024 / Published: 20 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Pathogenic Fungi: Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Castilleja tenuiflora is a native perennial plant used in traditional Mexican medicine. In June 2022, leaf blight symptoms were observed in a wild population of C. tenuiflora plants. Disease incidence was 80% and disease intensity reached up to 5% of the leaf area. Currently, there are no reports of pathogens causing leaf blight in this plant; therefore, this work aimed to identify the fungi responsible for the disease. The fungi recovered from the diseased tissue were characterized by means of pathogenicity tests and cultural, morphological, and molecular characterization. The information obtained revealed that Alternaria alternata and Alternaria gossypina are the pathogens responsible for the disease. This is the first report implicating species of Alternaria in causing leaf blight of C. tenuiflora in Mexico, as well as the first report of Alternaria gossypina also in Mexico. These pathogens may threaten the in situ conservation of native C. tenuiflora populations and limit their in vitro propagation. Future research lines should focus on determining the effect of these pathogens on metabolite production.

1. Introduction

Castilleja tenuiflora (Orobanchaceae), commonly known in Mexico as “Hierba del cáncer” [1,2,3], “Garañona” [1], “Yerba de la epístola” [4], “Cola de borrego” [5], and “Atzoyatl” [in Nahuatl] [5], is a small perennial plant native to the southern of the United States and Mexico that thrives in pine–oak forests [6]. This medicinal plant has been traditionally used in Mexican medicine for its pharmacological properties, including cancer treatment, as a remedy for gastric ulcers, respiratory disorders [7,8,9,10], and depression [11], and as an anti-inflammatory agent [6].
Given the pharmacological importance of C. tenuiflora, it is essential to preserve its native populations. An important part of this is the identification of diseases that may threaten its conservation in situ [12,13], its propagation in vitro, or even the production of the metabolites of interest [14,15,16]. The study of the diseases affecting this plant is limited, and so far only two rusts (fungi from the order Pucciniales) have been reported, (a) Puccinia nessodes in Mexico [17] and Guatemala [18] and (b) Cronartium colesporoides in Guatemala [18] and Costa Rica [19]. Therefore, there is a lack of information on foliar diseases that may occur in wild C. tenuiflora plants.
Alternaria is a ubiquitous fungal genus of the family Pleosporaceae [20,21,22] with more than 4000 species [23], including endophytic, saprophytic, opportunistic human-pathogenic, and plant-pathogenic species associated with a wide variety of hosts [24]. The plant-pathogenic Alternaria species are capable of infecting leaves, stems, roots, flowers, and fruits of vegetables, ornamentals, and trees. Diseases caused by Alternaria species are characterized by the induction of symptoms of leaf spots and blights, but they may also cause damping-off and stem, tuber, and fruit rot, as one of the genera of plant-pathogen fungi that generate the most losses [25]. The distinctive morphological feature of the genus Alternaria is the production of dark brown chains of phaeodictyospores [24]. However, morphological similarities between Alternaria species do not allow a properly morphological-based identification. Therefore, a multifaceted identification encompassing cultural, morphological, molecular, and phylogenetic identification is recommended [24].
During a plant collection trip to study the metabolites produced by wild C. tenuiflora, leaf blight symptoms were observed. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify the fungi responsible for these symptoms in C. tenuiflora plants from the Iztaccíhuatl-Popocatépetl National Park in Mexico.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection, Isolation, Purification, and Preservation of the Fungus Associated with Indian Paintbrush Leaf Blight

Twelve diseased plants of C. tenuiflora were collected at the Iztaccíhuatl-Popocatépetl National Park (latitude N 19°05′20″, longitude W 98°40′25.3″, at 3446 m.a.s.l) in June 2022. The sampled branches were placed in labeled paper bags and then enclosed in plastic bags. The collected samples were stored and transported in a cooler for processing at the Phytopathology Laboratory of the Center of Development of Biotic Products of the Instituto Politécnico Nacional (CEPROBI-IPN, by its acronym in Spanish).
For the isolation of fungi associated with the disease, the samples were sub-sampled to obtain leaf fragments of approximately 0.5 cm2 from the transition zone between healthy and diseased tissue. Tissue sections were disinfested with 1.5% sodium hypochlorite for 90 s, followed by a triple wash with sterile distilled water. The disinfested plant tissue was dried for 24 h between sterile blotting paper. The plant tissue fragments were then transferred to Petri dishes containing an acidified Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA; Bioxon, Mexico) medium and incubated in the dark at 28 °C for 48 h. Mycelial growth from the tissue sections was transferred to Petri dishes with a 2% Water–Agar (WA) medium and incubated in the dark at 28 °C for 24 h.
To obtain axenic isolates, a single spore was collected from each isolate using a stereoscopic microscope and an insulin needle. The spores were transferred back to Petri dishes with the acidified PDA medium and incubated in the dark at 28 °C until the fungus filled the plates. A total of 24 isolates were recovered from the diseased leaves of C. tenuiflora plants. The axenic isolates were grouped by morphotype, and one isolate per morphotype was randomly selected. Based on a microscopic examination of the morphological characteristics of the conidia, all isolates were tentatively delineated as Alternaria. For morphological and molecular characterization, three isolates were randomly selected, one for each morphotype observed. The isolates were stored in 10% glycerol and incorporated into the Culture Collection of Phytopathogenic Fungi of the CEPROBI-IPN under the accession numbers IPN 10.0151, IPN 10.0152, and IPN 10.0153.

2.2. Cultural and Morphological Characterization

For cultural characterization, one isolate of each morphotype was grown in V-8 juice agar (V-8) to stimulate pigment production and in potato–carrot agar (PCA) to stimulate the development of growth rings in addition to pigment production at 25 ± 2 °C for 7 days in a daily fluorescent light/dark cycle of 8/16 h [26]. To determine the growth rate, mycelial plugs 5 mm in diameter were placed at the center of plastic plates (90 × 15 mm) containing the PDA medium and incubated under the same conditions. The colony radius of three replicates for each isolate was documented every 24 h for 7 days. The growth rate was estimated and expressed in mm day−1 [27]. This experiment was conducted twice.
For morphological description of reproductive structures, isolates were grown on synthetic nutrient-poor agar (SNA) plates with a small piece of autoclaved filter paper on the agar surface [24]. The plates were incubated at 24 ± 2 °C for 7 days in a daily fluorescent light/dark cycle of 8/16 h without humidity control in unsealed plates. After the incubation, semi-permanent preparations were obtained by using lactic acid as a mounting medium; the preparations were sealed with a wax ring. From each isolate, 50 conidia were observed and measured using an Axio Imager.A2 microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).

2.3. DNA Extractions

Total genomic DNA was obtained from fresh fungal mycelia. Biomass from each isolate was obtained by growing pure colonies on PDA for four days and incubating them in the dark at 25 °C. Mycelia were recovered from the media by using a sterile spatula and placed in a sterile microtube. DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA integrity was evaluated on a 1% agarose gel and the amount of DNA was determined using a Nanodrop® One (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Madison, WI, USA). All samples were diluted in sterile MB grade nuclease-free water, adjusting the DNA concentration to 10 ng/μL and storing them at −20 °C.

2.4. Polymerase Chain Reactions (PCR) and Sequencing

The Internal Transcribed Spacer region (ITS) and the partial sequences of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gapdh), RNA polymerase II (rpb2), and translation elongation factor 1α (tef1) genes were amplified using the following primer pairs: ITS5/ITS4 [28], gpd1/gpd2 [29], RPB2-5F2 [30]/fRPB2-7cR [31], and EF1-728F/EF1-986R [32], respectively. The PCR master mix of each isolate was performed for each molecular marker, using 50 μL of the total mix volume, consisting of 25 μL of PCR Master Mix 2X (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA), 10 μM of each primer, 16 μL of nuclear-free water, and 4 μL of template DNA. PCR amplification for ITS, tef1, and rpb2 was carried out in a Piko Thermal Cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), using the parameters previously described by Woudenberg et al. (2013) [24], while gapdh was amplified according to the protocol developed by Berbee et al. (1999) [29]. To estimate the size and the integrity of the amplicons, electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel was conducted at 120 volts for 30 min employing a 100 pb DNA ladder as a reference (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). PCR products were stained with ethidium bromide and visualized in a photodocumentation system (UVP, Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ, USA). The amplified PCR products were purified by using the MinEliute® Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. For each amplicon, the sequencing of forward and reverse sequences was performed by Macrogen (Macrogen Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea). The consensus sequences were generated using the UGene software [33] and were deposited in the GenBank database of the National Center for Biotechnological Information (Table 1).

2.5. Identification by Phylogenetic Reconstruction

The partial sequences of gapdh, rpb2, and tef, as well as the ITS of each isolate, were subjected to compassion analysis in the non-redundant GenBank database via BLASTn (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) to identify closely related taxa. Taxonomically related reference sequences were collected considering the presumptive assignation of species criteria via preliminary analysis of the ITS marker (≥80% of query coverage and ≥97% of similarity percentage) [34,35]. Sequences from the study were visualized and manually edited with Seaview, version 5 [36], if they displayed contaminations or erroneous nucleotides. Once downloaded, the sequences were aligned in MAFFT version 7 [37] and trimmed in Mega V7 [38]. Then, the sequences were concatenated in Mesquite V3.7 [39]. Phylogenetic reconstruction was performed based on sequences belonging to closely related species to our studied strains, previously described and analyzed by Woudenberg et al. (2015) [40].
For phylogenetic reconstruction, a Maximum Likelihood (ML) analysis was performed with RaxmlGUI 2.0 [41] using the GTR+G model. The ML phylogenetic tree was inferred with a Bootstrap analysis of 1000 replicates for branch support. Additionally, a Bayesian Inference (BI) analysis was performed using MrBayes v.3.1.2 [42] with a specific substitution model for each partition selected based on the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) with 500,000 generations was run to determine posterior probabilities. Trees were sampled every 1000 generations, and 25% of the trees displayed in the burn-in phase were discarded. Phylogenetic trees were edited and visualized using FigTree (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/).

2.6. Pathogenicity Tests

Pathogenicity tests were conducted independently on the three isolates. Pathogenicity was demonstrated by spraying 1 mL of a spore suspension (1 × 104 conidia mL−1) on the leaves of four 100-day-old cultivated plants of C. tenuiflora [43]. Two plants of C. tenuiflora were sprayed with sterile distilled water and used as negative control plants. The inoculated plants were incubated at 22 ± 2 °C for 2 days in a daily fluorescent light/dark cycle of 8/16 h without humidity control in semi-sealed vitro boxes. The experiment was repeated twice. The presence or absence of leaf blight symptoms in the plants served to determine whether the isolate was pathogenic or not.

3. Results

The initial symptoms of the disease manifested as light brown spots that gradually spread across the leaf blade, which became necrotic. The foliar blight was first observed as a dark brown in color before turning black, with the presence of concentric rings as seen in other hosts [44,45,46,47]. The disease incidence in the C. tenuiflora plants in the Iztaccíhuatl-Popocatépetl National Park was 80% (n = 50 evaluated plants), with a disease intensity of up to 5%.

3.1. Cultural and Morphological Characterization

The colonial morphology of the isolate IPN 10.0151 on PDA was slightly convex with dense aerial mycelium; colonies were initially gray, becoming olive green with sporulation, whereas on medium V-8, the colony was flat grayish with whitish mycelium at the edges. Sporulation on V-8 was moderate and scattered, with a moderate amount of nonsporulating aerial hyphae in the colony. Sporulation on PCA was abundant, with minor nonsporulating aerial hyphae except in the lighter rings of growth produced during the dark phases of the photoperiodic cycle, and over time, four pairs of concentric rings of growth and sporulation were developed. The growth rate was variable in the different culture media employed, with PDA growth rates of 3.2 mm/day, PCA 4.3 mm/day, and V-8 3.9 mm/day. Primary conidiophores measured up to 59.2 µm (mean 29.7 × 2.3 µm) in length. Conidia were olive-brown phaeodictyospores, narrow-ovoid or ellipsoid, measuring 17.3 × 6.6 µm (Figure 1).
Colonies of the isolates IPN 10.0152 and IPN 10.0153 on PDA were umbonate with dense aerial mycelium; colonies were initially grayish dark to olive green, although the isolate IPN.10.0153 had a more intense pigmentation with abundant sporulation in the center. In V-8, the colonies were flat grayish white for isolate IPN 10.0152 to dark olive green with a white center and abundant sporulation in the isolate IPN 10.0153. Sporulation on PCA was abundant, with the presence of lighter rings produced during dark phases of the photoperiod cycle, which were more evident in the isolate IPN 10.0153, and over time, the growth of four pairs of concentric growth rings and sporulation were observed in both isolates but with more abundant sporulation in isolate IPN 10.0153. The growth rate was variable in the three culture media, PDA 4.9 mm/day, PCA 5.5 mm/day, and V-8 4.7 mm/day. Primary conidiophores were up to 42 µm (mean 29.7 × 2.4 µm). Conidia were phaeodictyospores; first conidia were long-elliptical, 17.8 × 5–7 µm, conidia produced later in the chain became ovoid, ellipsoid, or subsphaeroid (Figure 1).
The morphological features of isolates IPN 10.0151, IPN 10.0152, and IPN 10.0153 tentatively placed them within the genus Alternaria, section Alternaria [26,40]. Isolate IPN 10.0151 showed reduced colonial growth compared to isolates IPN 10.0152 and IPN 10.0153, especially in the V8 agar and PDA media (Figure 1).

3.2. Phylogenetic Identification

Since microscopic and cultural characterization are not sufficient determinants for the assignment of species belonging to Alternaria, taxonomic classification and identification must be complemented by the employment of phylogenetic reconstructions based on key molecular markers such as gapdh, rpb2, tef1, and ITS [40], which are used to perform an accurate species delimitation of Alternaria [48]. The presumptive identification-based analysis of ITS by BLASTn exhibited a ≥97% identity of the study strains with Alternaria alternata and A. gossypina. Optimization of the ML tree revealed a likelihood value of −4492.765252. The alignment was composed of 136 patterns. The ML tree was constructed based on the following empirical frequencies: freq pi(A) = 0.244842, freq pi(C) = 0.272964, freq pi(G) = 0.250118, and freq pi(T): 0.232076; a rate parameter of A-G = 3.683673, C-T= 8.267649; plus an alpha distribution of alpha: 0.089339. In the case of the BI tree, the Bayesian Posterior Probabilities resulted in a final average standard deviation of the slit sequences of around 0.250000.
Phylogenetic analyses of the concatenated sequences of gapdh, rpb2, tef1, and ITS showed that the isolates IPN 10.0152 and IPN 10.0153 were clustered in Alternaria section Alternata, showing a close phylogenetic relationship with strains of Alternaria alternata, while isolate IPN 10.0151 was also clustered in Alternaria section Alternata, but this isolate was closely related to Alternaria gossypina (Figure 2).

3.3. Pathogenicity Tests

All three Alternaria isolates were pathogenic to C. tenuiflora plants. Regardless of the isolate inoculated, the plants developed brown to black blights on the inoculated leaves and stems (Figure 3) with abundant mycelium 4 days after inoculation (DAI), and the blights progressed to complete necrosis of the plants after 7 days. The symptoms observed in the inoculated plants were the same as those observed in the naturally infected plants, from which the fungi were originally isolated. Moreover, the control plants remained asymptomatic throughout the experiment. The fungi were re-isolated from the symptomatic plants and found to be morphologically identical to the inoculated fungi, thus fulfilling Koch’s postulates. All three isolates induced similar symptoms in the inoculated plants. The results indicate that A. alternata and A. gossypina are the causal agents of leaf blight in C. tenuiflora plants growing in the Iztaccíhuatl-Popocatépetl National Park.

4. Discussion

Disinfestation of diseased plant tissues with sodium hypochlorite is a common method for isolation of phytopathogenic fungi and bacteria, as it eliminates microorganisms present on the surface of the sample, allowing only the recovery of disease-associated organisms present within the plant tissue of interest [49]. However, it has been observed that the efficacy of disinfectant molecules depends on the fungal species encountered and their intraspecific diversity, as well as the physiological state of the spores [50]. Similarly, fungi are more resistant to chlorine inactivation than bacteria and viruses; however, this resistance or sensitivity varies depending on the genus and species of the fungus in question [51]. In this study, the disinfestation process successfully allowed the recovery of the causal agents of the disease, without the detection of other microorganisms during the isolation process.
Due to the traditional use of C. tenuiflora, the study of diseases affecting this plant species is limited, in contrast to economically important crops. However, the interest in identifying diseases affecting this plant arises from the potential for intensive production, given recent discoveries regarding the production of metabolites of pharmacological interest. Thus, it is expected that in the coming years, the study of biotic and abiotic factors of this and other medicinal plants that may limit their propagation and cultivation will be completed, facilitating the commercial exploitation of these species. Prior to this investigation, only two species of rust-infecting C. tenuiflora had been reported, so the description of Alternaria alternata and Alternaria gossypina as causal agents of leaf blight represents a significant contribution to the understanding of biotic factors limiting the production of C. tenuiflora.
Unfortunately, given the location of the collection site where the disease was originally found, precise meteorological data are lacking. However, the meteorological conditions of the nearest community show an average temperature of 23 to 25 °C with no rainfall during the sampling period. The plant samples were collected just before the onset of the rainy season, so the plants were under water stress, a factor associated with increased plant susceptibility to diseases [52]. However, even though the plants used in the pathogenicity test were not under water stress, they still became diseased, demonstrating that water stress is not a determinant in the susceptibility of C. tenuiflora plants to leaf blight. Koch’s postulates were carried out under conditions of high relative humidity, a temperature of 22 ± 2 °C, and a daily fluorescent light/dark cycle of 8/16 h, which adequately simulated the conditions under which natural infection occurs and allowed us to successfully reproduce the disease.
Species of the genus Alternaria are globally distributed and occupy a variety of ecological niches. As a result, species within this genus may exhibit saprophytic, endophytic, or pathogenic lifestyles in soil, air, plant, or animal tissues [53]. In this case, isolates of Alternaria alternata and Alternaria gossypina were able to infect the foliar tissue of inoculated plants, demonstrating their phytopathogenic capacity according to Koch’s postulates. While both pathogens cause foliar blight with no apparent difference in the symptoms, they induce necrosis and reduce the photosynthetic capacity of affected plants. The effect of this damage on leaf senescence and the production of metabolites that confer pharmacological properties to the plant remains unclear.
The amplified regions enriched the taxonomic analysis and allowed us to confirm the species assignment. In fact, all the results indicated that the three isolates belong to the genus Alternaria section Alternata. Isolates IPN 10.0152 and IPN 10.0153 were easily distinguished with molecular information as members of the A. alternata clade, while the isolate IPN 10.0151 was closely related to A. gossypina and A. longipes. Nevertheless, both ML and BL allowed the separation and resolution of the phylogenetic position of isolate IPN 10.0151 and its closely related species. Therefore, the present study concluded that the isolate IPN 10.0151 can be recognized as A. gossypina. According to some authors [40,54,55], A. gossypina is synonymized under three main pathotypes: Alternaria colombiana, Alternaria grisea, and Alternaria tangelonis. In this work, the placement of isolate IPN 10.0151 in the logipes clade shows a narrow clustering with the above pathotypes. Instead, we observed and highlighted the formation of a new branch. This finding, along with the fact that this species infects a host not previously reported, suggests that this isolate may be a new pathotype, but more robust molecular, morphological, and microscopic assay experiments are needed to confirm this assertion.
Further research is needed on the phylogenetic delimitation of the species that constitute the Alternaria section Alternata, especially between the species A. gossypina and A. logipes. According to recent trends in phylogenetic species determination [56], we suggest that genome sequencing and phylogenomic analysis using type and reference isolates will be essential in the short term since phylogenetic analyses based on multilocus typing have not allowed us to better resolve the identity of some clades within the Alternata section.
We isolated two strains identified as A. alternata according to their phylogenetic placement. Although these two strains exhibited identical morphological traits, the strains were clustered in different clades. These strains also display morphological variations, in both V8 and PDA agar. It is noteworthy that the two strains isolated in this study are phenotypically and genotypically distinct despite being derived from the same sample, but preliminary studies describe that A. alternata can form genetically diverse populations in the same host [57]. Although the aforementioned studies were conducted on samples obtained from geographically distinct locations, the findings of our study are very interesting in that A. alternata can form genotypically diverse populations in the same geographic location. Perhaps these variations are related to how these strains infect and evolve into C. tenuiflora.
The Alternaria species reported in the present study are characterized by the induction of leaf spots and blight in several plant species. A. alternata has been reported to cause symptoms of blight in tomato [58,59], alfalfa [60], cotton [61], broccoli [62], potato [59], etc., while A. gossypina has been reported to induce leaf spot and boll rot in cotton [63].
In Mexico, A. alternata has been reported to infect “xoconostle” (Opuntia matudae) [64], broccoli [65], and onion [66]. Conversely, there are no previous reports describing plant diseases associated with A. gossypina in the Mexican territory; moreover, this study confirms the presence of A. gossypina in Mexico. There are few reports of A. gossypina infecting plants; the reports associate this fungus with native plants, tomatoes, and potatoes in China [59,67]. This is the first time that A. alternata and A. gossypina have been reported as plant pathogens in C. tenuiflora. This finding expands the host diversity that Alternaria alternata can infect.
Pathogenicity tests performed in potatoes and tomatoes have reported that A. alternata is capable of causing disease symptoms after 7–8 days of incubation [68,69]. In this study, the symptoms of infection caused by Alternaria spp. in C. tenuiflora were observed as early as 4 days after inoculation and necrosis 7 days after inoculation. The results reflect an accelerated process of infection and dissemination in the host. Perhaps our strains of study may harbor more effective mechanisms of virulence, but it is important to consider the immune response of C. tenuiflora, which may be less effective than the vegetable host.
Information on fungi affecting forest species in Mexico is limited or incomplete, and this lack of information on fungal diversity in national parks and reserves is even greater. There is an urgent need to obtain information on the diversity of these organisms in order to generate scientifically based and efficient preservation actions [70]. To date, Alternaria spp. including A. alternata have been reported in Mexico, causing foliar spots on Quercus, Pseudotsuga macrolepis, Pinus, Cupresus, Eucalyptus, etc. [71], indicating the presence of Alternaria species in the region near the C. tenuiflora collection site. There are no current reports of fungi infecting medicinal plants in the Iztaccíhuatl-Popocatépetl National Park. Therefore, because C. tenuiflora is used for medical treatments in several Mexican communities near the Iztaccíhuatl-Popocatépetl National Park, it is very important to maintain an innocuous preservation and propagation of native medicinal plants.

5. Conclusions

This is the first time that A. alternata and A. gossypina are reported as pathogens of C. tenuiflora. Remarkably, the results suggest that C. tenuiflora can be infected by genetically diverse strains of A. alternata. The onset of disease symptoms in C. tenuiflora caused by Alternaria spp. is observed in shorter periods compared to previous studies reported for vegetables. A. alternata and A. gossypina may jeopardize the in situ conservation of native C. tenuiflora populations under certain environmental conditions. Due to their ubiquitous nature, these fungi could infect other native forest plants of this National Park and pose a phytosanitary threat. In view of the pharmacological importance of C. tenuiflora and in order to preserve wild populations, in vitro propagation is recommended.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.T.-T., G.M.-L., M.K. and A.R.S.-B.; investigation, A.R.S.-B. and M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.R.S.-B. and G.M.-L.; writing—review and editing: J.O.-Á., A.R.S.-B. and G.M.-L.; funding acquisition, G.T.-T., J.L.T.-E. and G.M.-L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the Secretary of Research and Graduate of the National Polytechnic Institute (Instituto Politécnico Nacional), grant number 20240453.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Aguilar, A.; Camacho, J.; Chino, S.; Jacquez, P.; López, M. Herbario Medicinal del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. In Información Etnobotánica; México, D.F., Ed.; Mexican Social Security Institute: Torreón, Mexico, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  2. Martínez, M. Catálogo de Nombres Vulgares y Científicos de Plantas Mexicanas; México, D.F., Ed.; Fondo de Cultura Económica: Distrito Federal, México, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  3. Moreno-Escobar, J.A.; Bazald, A.S.; Villarreal, M.L.; Bonilla-Barbosa, J.R.; Mendoza, S.; Rodríguez-López, V. Cytotoxic and antioxidant activities of selected Lamiales species from Mexico. Pharm. Biol. 2011, 49, 1243–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Monroy-Ortiz, C.; Castillo-España, P. Plantas Medicinales Utilizadas en el Estado de Morelos; Comisión Nacional para el Conocimeinto y Uso de la Biodiversidad: Tlalpan, Mexico; Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Morelos: Cuernavaca, Mexico, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  5. Béjar, E.; Reyes-Chilpa, R.; Jiménez-Estrada, M. Bioactive Compounds from Selected Plants used in the XVI Century Mexican Traditional Medicine. Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem. 2000, 24, 799–844. [Google Scholar]
  6. Carrillo-Ocampo, D.; Bazaldúa-Gómez, S.; Bonilla-Barbosa, J.R.; Aburto-Amar, R.; Rodríguez-López, V. Anti-inflammatory activity of iridoids and verbascoside isolated from Castilleja tenuiflora. Molecules 2013, 18, 12109–12118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Alonso-Castro, A.J.; Villarreal, M.L.; Salazar-Olivo, L.A.; Gomez-Sanchez, M.; Dominguez, F.; Garcia-Carranca, A. Mexican medicinal plants used for cancer treatment: Pharmacological, phytochemical and ethnobotanical studies. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 133, 945–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Graham, J.G.; Quinn, M.L.; Fabricant, D.S.; Farnsworth, N.R. Plants used against cancer—An extension of the work of Jonathan Hartwell. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 73, 347–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hirschhorn, H.H. Botanical remedies of south and central america, and the caribbean: An archival analysis. part II. conclusion. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1982, 5, 163–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. López-Rodríguez, R.; Herrera-Ruiz, M.; Trejo-Tapia, G.; Domínguez-Mendoza, B.E.; González-Cortazar, M.; Zamilpa, A. In Vivo Gastroprotective and Antidepressant Effects of Iridoids, Verbascoside and Tenuifloroside from Castilleja tenuiflora Benth. Molecules 2019, 24, 1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Herrera-Ruiz, M.; López-Rodríguez, R.; Trejo-Tapia, G.; Domínguez-Mendoza, B.E.; González-Cortazar, M.; Tortoriello, J.; Zamilpa, A. A New Furofuran Lignan Diglycoside and Other Secondary Metabolites from the Antidepressant Extract of Castilleja tenuiflora Benth. Molecules 2015, 20, 13127–13143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fisher, M.C.; Henk, D.A.; Briggs, C.J.; Brownstein, J.S.; Madoff, L.C.; McCraw, S.L.; Gurr, S.J. Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health. Nature 2012, 484, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Loo, J.A. Ecological impacts of non-indigenous invasive fungi as forest pathogens. Biol. Invasions 2009, 11, 81–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jan, R.; Asaf, S.; Numan, M.; Lubna; Kim, K.-M. Plant Secondary Metabolite Biosynthesis and Transcriptional Regulation in Response to Biotic and Abiotic Stress Conditions. Agronomy 2021, 11, 968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mikkelsen, B.L.; Olsen, C.E.; Lyngkjær, M.F. Accumulation of secondary metabolites in healthy and diseased barley, grown under future climate levels of CO2, ozone and temperature. Phytochemistry 2015, 118, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pavarini, D.P.; Pavarini, S.P.; Niehues, M.; Lopes, N.P. Exogenous influences on plant secondary metabolite levels. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2012, 176, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gallegos, H.L.; Cummins, G.B. Uredinales (Royas) de Mexico, Vol. 1; Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agricolas: Cualicán, Sinaloa, México, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  18. Holway, E.W.D.; Arthur, J.C. Uredinales of Guatemala Based on Collections by E. W. D. Holway. III. Puccinia, Exclusive of Species on Carduaceae. Am. J. Bot. 1918, 5, 462–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Berndt, R. A checklist of Costa Rican rust fungi. In Frontiers of Basidiomycote Mycology; Agerer, R.M.P., Blanz, P., Eds.; IHW: Eching, Germany, 2004; pp. 185–326. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hattab, Z.; Ben Lasfar, N.; Abid, M.; Bellazreg, F.; Fathallah, A.; Hachfi, W.; Letaief, A. Alternaria alternata infection causing rhinosinusitis and orbital involvement in an immunocompetent patient. New Microbes New Infect. 2019, 32, 100561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, G.; Yoo, S.J.; Yoo, J.R.; Seo, K.B. The first case report of thorn-induced Alternaria alternata infection of the hand in an immunocompetent host. BMC Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lawrence, D.P.; Rotondo, F.; Gannibal, P.B. Biodiversity and taxonomy of the pleomorphic genus Alternaria. Mycol. Prog. 2015, 15, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bessadat, N.; Hamon, B.; Bataillé-Simoneau, N.; Mabrouk, K.; Simoneau, P. Characterization of New Small-Spored Alternaria Species Isolated from Solanaceae in Algeria. Life 2021, 11, 1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Woudenberg, J.H.C.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Binder, M.; Crous, P.W. Alternaria redefined. Stud. Mycol. 2013, 75, 171–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Agrios, G.N. Plant Pathology, 5th ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  26. Simmons, E.G. Alternaria: An Identification Manual; CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zervakis, G.; Philippoussis, A.; Ioannidou, S.; Diamantopoulou, P. Mycelium growth kinetics and optimal temperature conditions for the cultivation of edible mushroom species on lignocellulosic substrates. Folia Microbiol. 2001, 46, 231–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. White, T.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA Genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols, a Guide to Methods and Applications; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  29. Berbee, M.L.; Pirseyedi, M.; Hubbard, S. Cochliobolus phylogenetics and the origin of known, highly virulent pathogens, inferred from ITS and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene sequences. Mycologia 1999, 91, 964–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sung, G.H.; Sung, J.M.; Hywel-Jones, N.L.; Spatafora, J.W. A multi-gene phylogeny of Clavicipitaceae (Ascomycota, Fungi): Identification of localized incongruence using a combinational bootstrap approach. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 44, 1204–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Liu, Y.J.; Whelen, S.; Hall, B.D. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: Evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999, 16, 1799–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Carbone, I.; Kohn, L.M. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 1999, 91, 553–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Okonechnikov, K.; Golosova, O.; Fursov, M. Unipro UGENE: A unified bioinformatics toolkit. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1166–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nilsson, R.H.; Kristiansson, E.; Ryberg, M.; Hallenberg, N.; Larsson, K.H. Intraspecific ITS variability in the kingdom fungi as expressed in the international sequence databases and its implications for molecular species identification. Evol. Bioinform. Online 2008, 4, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Raja, H.A.; Miller, A.N.; Pearce, C.J.; Oberlies, N.H. Fungal Identification Using Molecular Tools: A Primer for the Natural Products Research Community. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 756–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gouy, M.; Tannier, E.; Comte, N.; Parsons, D.P. Seaview Version 5: A Multiplatform Software for Multiple Sequence Alignment, Molecular Phylogenetic Analyses, and Tree Reconciliation. Methods Mol. Biol. 2021, 2231, 241–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Katoh, K.; Rozewicki, J.; Yamada, K.D. MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief. Bioinform. 2017, 20, 1160–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Maddison, W.P.; Maddison, D.R. Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. Version 3.7. 2023. Available online: https://mesquiteproject.org/ (accessed on 2 May 2024).
  40. Woudenberg, J.H.C.; Seidl, M.F.; Groenewald, J.Z.; de Vries, M.; Stielow, J.B.; Thomma, B.P.H.J.; Crous, P.W. Alternaria section Alternaria: Species, formae speciales or pathotypes? Stud. Mycol. 2015, 82, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Edler, D.; Klein, J.; Antonelli, A.; Silvestro, D. raxmlGUI 2.0: A graphical interface and toolkit for phylogenetic analyses using RAxML. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2021, 12, 373–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Huelsenbeck, J.P.; Ronquist, F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2001, 17, 754–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Salcedo-Morales, G.; Rosas-Romero, G.; Nabor-Correa, N.; Bermúdez-Torres, K.; López-Laredo, A.R.; Trejo-Tapia, G. Propagation and conservation of Castilleja tenuiflora Benth. (“hierba del cancer”) through in vitro culture. Polibotánica 2009, 119–137. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ahmed, M.Z.; Saeed, S.; Hassan, A.; Ghuffar, S.; Abdullah, A.; Iqbal, R.; Anwaar, H.A.; Haque, K.; Asif, M.A.; Shafique, M.S. Alternaria alternata Causing Leaf Spot of Cucumis melo (Muskmelon) in Pakistan. Plant Dis. 2021, 105, 1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Maiti, C.K.; Sen, S.; Paul, A.K.; Acharya, K. First Report of Alternaria dianthicola Causing Leaf Blight on Withania somnifera from India. Plant Dis. 2007, 91, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Praveen, B.; Nagaraja, A.; Prasanna Kumar, M.K.; Pramesh, D.; Palanna, K.B.; Buella, P.P. First Report of Alternaria alternata Causing Leaf Blight on Little Millet (Panicum sumatrense) in India. Plant Dis. 2021, 105, 1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Schmey, T.; Tominello-Ramirez, C.S.; Brune, C.; Stam, R. Alternaria diseases on potato and tomato. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2024, 25, e13435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Luo, M.; Zhao, M.; Huang, Y.; Liu, J.; Huang, Q.; Shu, Y.; Dong, Z. First Record of Alternaria pogostemonis: A Novel Species Causing Leaf Spots in Pogostemon cablin. Pathogens 2022, 11, 1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Oliver, R.P. Agrios’ Plant Pathology, 6th ed.; Elsevier: London, UK, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  50. Visconti, V.; Rigalma, K.; Coton, E.; Dantigny, P. Impact of the physiological state of fungal spores on their inactivation by active chlorine and hydrogen peroxide. Food Microbiol. 2021, 100, 103850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Pereira, V.J.; Marques, R.; Marques, M.; Benoliel, M.J.; Barreto Crespo, M.T. Free chlorine inactivation of fungi in drinking water sources. Water Res. 2013, 47, 517–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Shao, H.; Chu, L.; Jaleel, C.; Zhao, C. Water-deficit stress-induced anatomical changes in higher plants. Comptes Rendus Biol. 2008, 331, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Logrieco, A.F.; Moretti, A.; Solfrizzo, M. Alternaria toxins and plant diseases: An overview of origin, occurrence and risks. World Mycotoxin J. 2009, 2, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Achilonu, C.C.; Marais, G.J.; Ghosh, S.; Gryzenhout, M. Multigene Phylogeny and Pathogenicity Trials Revealed Alternaria alternata as the Causal Agent of Black Spot Disease and Seedling Wilt of Pecan (Carya illinoinensis) in South Africa. Pathogens 2023, 12, 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dettman, J.R.; Eggertson, Q. Phylogenomic analyses of Alternaria section Alternaria: A high-resolution, genome-wide study of lineage sorting and gene tree discordance. Mycologia 2021, 113, 1218–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wu, B.; Hussain, M.; Zhang, W.; Stadler, M.; Liu, X.; Xiang, M. Current insights into fungal species diversity and perspective on naming the environmental DNA sequences of fungi. Mycology 2019, 10, 127–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Adhikari, T.B.; Muzhinji, N.; Halterman, D.; Louws, F.J. Genetic diversity and population structure of Alternaria species from tomato and potato in North Carolina and Wisconsin. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 17024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Akhtar, K.P.; Saleem, M.Y.; Asghar, M.; Haq, M.A. New report of Alternaria alternata causing leaf blight of tomato in Pakistan. Plant Pathol. 2004, 53, 816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gou, Y.; Aung, S.L.L.; Guo, Z.; Li, Z.; Shen, S.; Deng, J. Four New Species of Small-Spored Alternaria Isolated from Solanum tuberosum and S. lycopersicum in China. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Abbasi, P.A.; Ali, S.; Renderos, W.; Naeem, H.A.; Papadopoulos, Y. First report of Alternaria alternata causing leaf spot and blight symptoms on alfalfa in Canada. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2018, 40, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mohamed, O.E.; Beshir, M.M.; Ahmed, N.E. Cotton leaf blight disease caused by Alternaria alternata in Sudan. J. Plant Prot. Res. 2019, 59, 412–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Nira, S.T.; Hossain, M.F.; Mahmud, N.U.; Hassan, O.; Islam, T.; Akanda, A.M. Alternaria leaf spot of broccoli caused by Alternaria alternata in Bangladesh. Plant Prot. Sci. 2022, 58, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hopkins, J.C.F. Alternaria gossypina (Thüm.) comb. nov. causing a leaf spot and boll rot of cotton. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1931, 16, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Montiel-Salero, D.; Jiménez-Aguilar, A.; Ramírez-Sánchez, S.; Ruiz-Juárez, D.; Guerrero-Andrade, O.; Segundo-Pedraza, E.; Olivares-Orozco, J.; Ramos-López, M.; Flores-Macías, A. First report of Alternaria alternata causing the golden spot in xoconostle (Opuntia matudae) in Hidalgo, México. Mex. J. Phytopathol. 2022, 40, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Arratia-Castro, A.A.; Fernández-Herrera, E.; Gómez-Espinoza, M.G.; Herrera-Flores, T.S.; Moreno-Contreras, M.G.; Licea-de Anda, E.M.; Ramírez-Bustos, I.I. Alternaria alternata, Fusarium oxysporum and Fusarium verticillioides identified as causal agents of broccoli head rot in Mexico. Rev. Chapingo Ser. Hortic. 2022, 28, 175–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Reyes-Tena, A.; Montoya-Martínez, A.C.; Fernández-Pavía, S.P.; Santillán-Mendoza, R.; Jiménez-Villegas, A.; Pineda-Vaca, D.; Rodríguez-Alvarado, G. Onion leaf blight caused by Alternaria alternata sensu lato and Stemphylium vesicarium in Michoacán, México. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2024, 46, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, Y.X.; Dong, X.F.; Yang, A.L.; Zhang, H.B. Diversity and pathogenicity of Alternaria species associated with the invasive plant Ageratina adenophora and local plants. PeerJ 2022, 10, e13012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Baltzakis, I.; Nindya, S.; Rahmayani, R.; Thomas, J.E.; van der Werf, W.; Struik, P.C. Pathogenicity of Single and Combined Inoculations of Alternaria spp. on Potato. Potato Res. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ismail, A.M.; Elshewy, E.S.; El-Ganainy, S.M.; Magistà, D.; Hamouda, A.F.; Alhudaib, K.A.; Ebrahim, W.; Almaghasla, M.I. Mycotoxins from Tomato Pathogenic Alternaria alternata and Their Combined Cytotoxic Effects on Human Cell Lines and Male Albino Rats. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rudawska, M.; Leski, T.; Stasińska, M.; Karliński, L.; Wilgan, R.; Kujawska, M. The contribution of forest reserves and managed forests to the diversity of macrofungi of different trophic groups in European mixed coniferous forest ecosystem. For. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 518, 120274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cibrián-Tovar, D.; Alvarado-Rosales, D.; García-Díaz, S.E. Enfermedades Forestales en México; Universidad Autónoma Chapingo: Texcoco, Mexico, 2007. [Google Scholar]
Microorganisms 12 01714 g001
Figure 1. Cultural characteristics of Alternaria spp. isolated from C. tenuiflora. (A–C). Isolate IPN 10.0151 (A. gossypina). (D–F). Isolate IPN 10.0152 (A. alternata). (G–I). Isolate IPN 10.0153 (A. alternata). (A,D,G). Colonies on PCA, 10 d growth at 25 °C. (B,E,H). Colonies on V8 Agar, 10 d growth at 25 °C. (C,F,I). Colonies on PDA, 10 d growth at 25 °C.
Figure 1. Cultural characteristics of Alternaria spp. isolated from C. tenuiflora. (A–C). Isolate IPN 10.0151 (A. gossypina). (D–F). Isolate IPN 10.0152 (A. alternata). (G–I). Isolate IPN 10.0153 (A. alternata). (A,D,G). Colonies on PCA, 10 d growth at 25 °C. (B,E,H). Colonies on V8 Agar, 10 d growth at 25 °C. (C,F,I). Colonies on PDA, 10 d growth at 25 °C.
Microorganisms 12 01714 g001
Microorganisms 12 01714 g002
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of Alternaria strains recovered from C. tenuiflora plants. The phylogeny was constructed based on gapdh, rpb2, and tef-1 partial gene sequences and ITS. Numbers at nodes in bold represent the Posterior Probability of Bayesian inference followed by ML Bootstrap support values. Branch lengths are proportional to the number of substitutions per site (scale bar). T: ex-type isolate; R: representative isolate. Isolates from this study are indicated in red.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of Alternaria strains recovered from C. tenuiflora plants. The phylogeny was constructed based on gapdh, rpb2, and tef-1 partial gene sequences and ITS. Numbers at nodes in bold represent the Posterior Probability of Bayesian inference followed by ML Bootstrap support values. Branch lengths are proportional to the number of substitutions per site (scale bar). T: ex-type isolate; R: representative isolate. Isolates from this study are indicated in red.
Microorganisms 12 01714 g002
Microorganisms 12 01714 g003
Figure 3. Foliar blight on Castilleja tenuiflora plants. (A) Symptoms of blight on petals. (B) Symptoms of leaf blight. (C) Healthy C. tenuiflora plant in vitro (control, non-inoculated plant). (D) Foliar blight caused by Alternaria gossypina (isolate IPN 10.0151). (E) Foliar blight caused by Alternaria alternata (isolate IPN 10.0152). (F) Foliar blight caused by Alternaria alternata (isolate IPN 10.0153).
Figure 3. Foliar blight on Castilleja tenuiflora plants. (A) Symptoms of blight on petals. (B) Symptoms of leaf blight. (C) Healthy C. tenuiflora plant in vitro (control, non-inoculated plant). (D) Foliar blight caused by Alternaria gossypina (isolate IPN 10.0151). (E) Foliar blight caused by Alternaria alternata (isolate IPN 10.0152). (F) Foliar blight caused by Alternaria alternata (isolate IPN 10.0153).
Microorganisms 12 01714 g003
Table 1. Isolates of Alternaria section Alternata used in this study for phylogenetic analyses and their GenBank accession numbers.
Table 1. Isolates of Alternaria section Alternata used in this study for phylogenetic analyses and their GenBank accession numbers.
Species Isolate CodeITSgapdhrpb2tef1
Alternaria alstroemeriaeCBS 118808KP124296 KP124153 KP124764KP125071
CBS 118809KP124297 KP124154 KP124765KP125072
Alternaria alternataCBS 106.24KP124298 KP124155 KP124766KP125073
CBS 103.33KP124302 KP124159 KP124770KP125077
CBS 117.44KP124303 KP124160 KP124772KP125079
CBS 102.47KP124304 KP124161 KP124773KP125080
CBS 194.86KP124316KP124172KP124784KP125092
CBS 195.86KP124317 KP124173 KP124785KP125093
CBS 479.90KP124319 KP124174KP124787KP125095
CBS 595.93KP124320 KP124175 KP124788KP125096
CBS 918.96AF347032 AY278809 KC584435KC584693
CBS 102598KP124329 KP124184 KP124797KP125105
CBS 110977AF347031AY278808 KC584375KC584634
CBS 118811KP124356 KP124210 KP124824KP125132
CBS 118812KC584193 KC584112 KC584393KC584652
CBS 118814KP124357 KP124211 KP124825KP125133
CBS 118818KP124359 KP124213 KP124827KP125135
CBS 121336KJ862254 KJ862255 KP124833KP125141
CBS 121348KP124367 KP124219KP124836KP125144
CBS 121454MH863109AY278812KP124837KP125145
CBS 127672KP124382 KP124234 KP124852KP125160
IPN 10.0152PP099883PP354051PP354054PP354057
IPN 10.0153PP099884PP354052PP354055PP354058
Alternaria arborescensCBS 101.13KP124392 KP124244KP124862KP125170
CBS 105.24KP124393 KP124245 KP124863KP125171
CBS 102605AF347033 AY278810 KC584377KC584636
CBS 750.68KP124398 KP124250 KP124868KP125176
CBS 118389KP124407 KP124259 KP124877KP125185
CBS 119544KP124408 JQ646321 KP124878KP125186
CBS 119545KP124409 KP124260 KP124879KP125187
Alternaria betae-kenyensisCBS 118810KP124419 KP124270 KP124888KP125197
Alternaria burnsiiCBS 108.27KC584236 KC584162 KC584468KC584727
CBS 107.38KP124420 JQ646305 KP124889KP125198
CBS 110.50KP124421 KP124271KP124890KP125199
CBS 879.95KP124422 KP124272 KP124891KP125200
CBS 118816KP124423 KP124273 KP124892KP125201
CBS 118817KP124424 KP124274 KP124893KP125202
Alternaria eichhorniaeCBS 489.92KC146356 KP124276 KP124895KP125204
CBS 119778KP124426 KP124277 KP124896KP125205
Alternaria gaisenCBS 632.93KC584197 KC584116 KC584399KC584658
CBS 118488KP124427 KP124278 KP124897KP125206
CPC 25268KP124428KP124279 KP124898KP125207
Alternaria gossypinaCBS 100.23KP124429 KP124280 KP124899KP125208
CBS 104.32KP124430 JQ646312 KP124900KP125209
CBS 107.36KP124431 JQ646310 KP124901KP125210
CBS 102597KP124432 KP124281KP124902KP125211
CBS 102601KP124433 KP124282 KP124903KP125212
IPN 10.0151PP099882PP354050PP354053PP354056
Alternaria iridiaustralisCBS 118404KP124434 KP124283 KP124904KP125213
CBS 118486KP124435 KP124284 KP124905KP125214
CBS 118487KP124436 KP124285KP124906 KP125215
Alternaria jacinthicolaCBS 878.95KP124437 KP124286 KP124907KP125216
CBS 133751KP124438 KP124287 KP124908KP125217
CPC 25267KP124439 KP124288 KP124909KP125218
Alternaria longipesCBS 113.35KP124440 KP124289 KP124910KP125219
CBS 539.94KP124441 KP124290 KP124911KP125220
CBS 540.94AY278835 AY278811 KC584409KC584667
CBS 917.96KP124442 KP124291 KP124912KP125221
CBS 121332KP124443 KP124292 KP124913KP125222
CBS 121333KP124444 KP124293 KP124914KP125223
Alternaria tomatoCBS 103.30KP124445 KP124294 KP124915KP125224
CBS 114.35KP124446 KP124295KP124916KP125225
Alternaria alternantheraeCBS 124392KC584179 KC584096 KC584374KC584633
CBS: Culture collection of the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CPC: Personal collection of P.W. Crous, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Accession numbers generated in this study are shown in bold.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Solano-Báez, A.R.; Trejo-Tapia, G.; Kolařík, M.; Ortiz-Álvarez, J.; Trejo-Espino, J.L.; Márquez-Licona, G. Etiology of Foliar Blight of Indian Paintbrush (Castilleja tenuiflora) in Mexico. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1714. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12081714

AMA Style

Solano-Báez AR, Trejo-Tapia G, Kolařík M, Ortiz-Álvarez J, Trejo-Espino JL, Márquez-Licona G. Etiology of Foliar Blight of Indian Paintbrush (Castilleja tenuiflora) in Mexico. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(8):1714. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12081714

Chicago/Turabian Style

Solano-Báez, Alma Rosa, Gabriela Trejo-Tapia, Miroslav Kolařík, Jossue Ortiz-Álvarez, José Luis Trejo-Espino, and Guillermo Márquez-Licona. 2024. "Etiology of Foliar Blight of Indian Paintbrush (Castilleja tenuiflora) in Mexico" Microorganisms 12, no. 8: 1714. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12081714

APA Style

Solano-Báez, A. R., Trejo-Tapia, G., Kolařík, M., Ortiz-Álvarez, J., Trejo-Espino, J. L., & Márquez-Licona, G. (2024). Etiology of Foliar Blight of Indian Paintbrush (Castilleja tenuiflora) in Mexico. Microorganisms, 12(8), 1714. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12081714

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop