Next Article in Journal
Metatranscriptomic Analysis of Bacterial Communities on Laundered Textiles: A Pilot Case Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Genetic Diversity of Leuconostoc mesenteroides Isolates from Traditional Montenegrin Brine Cheese
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Phylogeny of Unicellular Marine Coccoid Green Algae Revealed New Insights into the Systematics of the Ulvophyceae (Chlorophyta)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis and Reconstitution of the Menaquinone Biosynthesis Pathway in Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Lentilactibacillus buchneri
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Oligosaccharide Metabolism and Lipoteichoic Acid Production in Lactobacillus gasseri and Lactobacillus paragasseri

Microorganisms 2021, 9(8), 1590; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9081590
by Tsukasa Shiraishi 1,*, Shintaro Maeno 2, Sayoko Kishi 2, Tadashi Fujii 3, Hiroki Tanno 2, Katsuaki Hirano 3, Takumi Tochio 3, Yasuhiro Tanizawa 4, Masanori Arita 4,5, Shin-ichi Yokota 1 and Akihito Endo 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Microorganisms 2021, 9(8), 1590; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9081590
Submission received: 5 July 2021 / Revised: 20 July 2021 / Accepted: 20 July 2021 / Published: 26 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors studied the effect of different carbohydrates on the production  lipoteichoic acid (LTA) and characterized oligosaccharide metabolic systems of L. gasseri JCM 1131and L. paragasseri JCM 1165, employing transcriptomic analysis.   The methodology used is adequate for the objective proposed and the results were analyzed using appropriate statistical tools. The discussion is adequate and supported by updated bibliographies. The manuscript presents results that are important in the field of biotcs (Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics). I suggest the publication of the manuscript in Microorganisms with minor revisions.

Some suggestions:

- In the abstract section, page 1, lines 27-28 authors should add the numerical value of the time that production increased LTA

- The abstract should end by explaining the importance of research conducted.

- In the introduction section page 2, lines 81-84. Authors should rewrite this sentence, focusing on the purpose of their research.

- The phrase: “….Raffinose, a common prebiotic, was used for a reference. RNA sequencing was conducted to characterize carbohydrate metabolic systems and LTA production systems in these strains”,  should be omitted from this section and should be added in the materials and methods section.

-The authors did not consider conducting the production and Immunoblot detection of LTA on cell suspensions from free-sugar medium?

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a very good paper based on up-to-date methodology, with sound results and nicely presented. The reviewer has, however, some suggestions:

- The authors may consider dividing the content into two parts: one on oligosaccharides metabolism and second on LTA production by the two tested collection strains. Although both activities were followed with the same transcriptomic analysis under influence of  the same carbohydrates, their meaning is not the same, as oligosaccharides produced by the strains may be regarded as "internal" prebiotics, while LTA not. Morever, as the authors mentioned in discussion, little is known about Lactobacillus LTA in comparison to this of S.aureus. Term "immunomodulation" used in this context has a very broad meaning rather not related to prebiotics and synbiotics.             

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop