The Effect of Effective Microorganisms on the Quality of Potato Chips and French Fries
Abstract
:Featured Application
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Cultivation Conditions
2.2. Methodology for the Sampling and Assessment of Soil Sample
2.3. Soil Conditions
2.4. Methodology of Assessing PC
2.5. FF Testing Methodology
2.6. Meteorological Conditions
2.7. Statistical Analysis
- −
- σs2 e—this is the assessment of environmental variability associated with repeated observations or measurements over three years of research;
- −
- σs2 G—assessment of genotypic (varietal) variability;
- −
- σs2 T—evaluation of technological (agrotechnical) variability;
- −
- σs2 p—assessment of phenotypic (total) variability.
3. Results
3.1. Quality Assessment of PC
3.2. FF Quality Evaluation
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
BBCH | Biologische Bundesanstalt, Bundessortenamt und CHemische Industrie |
EM | Effective microorganisms |
FF | French fries |
HSD | Honestly Significant Difference |
PC | potato chips |
WRB | World Reference Base for Soil Resources |
TO | total oil content of potato slices |
STO | construction oil |
PSO | penetrated surface oil |
SO | surface oil |
References and Note
- Al-Taweil, H.I.; Bin Osman, M.; Hamid, A.A.; Yusoff, W.M. Development of microbial inoculants and the impact of soil application on rice seedlings growth. Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2009, 4, 79–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Allahverdiyev, S.R.; Kırdar, E.; Gunduz, G.; Kadimaliyev, D.; Revin, V.; Filonenko, V.; Rasulova, D.A.; Abbasova, Z.I.; Gani-Zade, S.I.; Zeynalova, E.M. Effective Microorganisms (EM) Technology in Plants. Technology 2011, 14, 103–106. [Google Scholar]
- Zakaria, Z.; Gairola, S.; Shariff, N.M. Effective Microorganisms (EM) Technology for Water Quality Restoration and Potential for Sustainable Water Resources and Management. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software Modelling for Environment’s Sake, Fifth Biennial Meeting, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 5–8 July 2010; David, A., Swayne, Wanhong, Y., Voinov, A.A., Rizzoli, A., Filatova, T., Eds.; International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs): Manno, Switzerland. Available online: http://www.iemss.org/iemss2010/index.php?n=Main.Proceedings (accessed on 20 November 2020).
- Li, X.; Guo, Q.; Wang, Y.; Xu, J.; Wei, Q.; Chen, L.; Liao, L. Enhancing Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal by Applying Effective Microorganisms to Constructed Wetlands. Water 2020, 12, 2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okumoto, S.; Shintani, M.; Higa, T. The use of effective microorganisms and biochar inhibits the transfer of radioactive cesium from soil to plant during continuous komatsuna cultivation. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference "Radiobiology: Present", Institute of Radiobiology of the NAS of Belarus, Gomel, Belarus, 26–27 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Kaczmarek, Z.; Owczarzak, W.; Mrugalska, L.; Grzelak, M. Effect of effective microorganisms on selected physical and water properties of arable-humus levels of mineral soils. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng. 2007, 52, 73–77. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Kaczmarek, Z.; Wolna-Murawska, A.; Jakubas, M. Change in the number of selected groups of soil microorganisms and enzymatic activity in soil inoculated with effective microorganisms (EM). J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng. 2008, 53, 122–128. [Google Scholar]
- Zarzecka, K.; Gugała, M. Effect of UGmax soil fertilizer on the potato yield and its structure. Bull. IHAR 2013, 267, 107–112. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Kołodziejczyk, M. Effect of nitrogen fertilization and microbial populations on potato yielding. Plant Soil Environ. 2014, 60, 379–386. [Google Scholar]
- Sawicka, B.; Mohammed, A.; Umachandran, K. Food Safety of Potato Processed in the Aspect of Acrylamide Risk. MOJ Food Process. Technol. 2018, 6, 00151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sawicka, B.; Pszczółkowski, P.; Noaema, A.H.; Krochmal-Marczak, B.; Kiełtyka-Dadasiewicz, A. Effective Microorganisms in Agriculture and Food Processing. Modern Research on the State of the Environment and the Therapeutic Use of Plants; Chwil, M., Skoczylas, M.M., Eds.; Publishing House of the University of Life Sciences in Lublin: Lublin, Poland, 2019; pp. 45–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pszczółkowski, P.; Sawicka, B.; Danilčenko, H.; Jarienė, E. The role of microbiological preparations in improving the quality of potato tubers. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference ‘New trends in food safety and quality’, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Akademija, Lithuania, 5–7 October 2017; pp. 22–23. [Google Scholar]
- Van Vliet, P.C.J.; Bloem, J.; De Goede, R.G.M. Microbial diversity, nitrogen loss and grass production after addition of effective microorganisms (EM) to slurry manure. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2006, 32, 188–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martyniuk, S. Production of microbiological preparations on the example of symbiotic bacteria in legumes. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng. 2010, 55, 20–23. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Zgórska, K. Quality of edible potatoes and potatoes for food processing. Polish Potato 2002, 4, 14–20. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Zgórska, K. Quality requirements for potato varieties for food processing. Earth Half 2004, 4, 26–28. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Lisińska, G. Technological value and consumption quality of Polish potato varieties. Zesz. Probl. Post. Sci. Agric. 2006, 511, 81–94. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Lisińska, G. Food processed potato: Production volume, nutritional value. Zesz. Probl. Post. Agric. Sci. 2004, 500, 57–68. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Rytel, E.; Nemś, A.; Kułakowska, K. Effect of pre-drying temperature on content of glycoalcaloids and nitrates (v) during laboratory production of dehydrated cooked potatoes. Żywność. Nauka. Technologia. Jakość 2013, 1, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sawicka, B.; Barbaś, P. Dependence of French fries quality on the chemical composition of potato tubers in organic and integrated cultivation system. Sci. Przyr. Technol. 2011, 5, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- Zgórska, K.; Grudzińska, M. Changes in selected quality characteristics of potato tubers during storage. Acta Agrophys. 2012, 19, 203–214. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Kolasa-Więcek, A. Will Effective Microorganisms Revolutionize the World? Post. Technol. Convert Spoz. 2010, 1, 66–69. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Vaitkevičienė, N. The Effect of Biodynamic Preparations on the Accumulation of Biologically Active Compounds in the Tubers of Different Genotypes of Ware Potatoes. Ph.D. Thesis, Agricultural Sciences, Agronomy (01A), ASU, Akademija, Kaunas, Lithuania, 2016; p. 212. [Google Scholar]
- Vaitkevičienė, N.; Jariene, E.; Danilcenko, H.; Sawicka, B. Effect of biodynamic preparations on the content of some mineral elements and starch in tubers of three colored potato cultivars. J. Elem. 2016, 21, 927–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mrugalska, L.; Świerk, D. Effective Microorganisms—A revolutionary technology? Por. Gosp. 2012, 5, 33–35. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Szembowski, B. Experiences of a Farm in Trankwice with the EM-FarmingTM Biotechnology. Natural Probiotic Microorganisms; Associate Ecosystem: Lichen, Poland, 2009; pp. 56–58. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014 International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps; World Soil Resources Reports 106; Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Duer, I.; Fotyma, M.; Madej, A. Code of Good Agricultural Practice; MRiRW: Warsaw, Poland, 2004. (In Polish)
- Roztropowicz, S.; Czerko, Z.; Głuska, A.; Goliszewski, W.; Gruczek, T.; Lis, B.; Lutomirska, B.; Nowacki, W.; Rykaczewska, K.; Sowa-Niedziałkowska, G.; et al. Methodology of Observation, Measurement and Sampling in Agrotechnical Experiments with Potatoes; IHAR Radzików, Branch: Jadwisin, Poland, 1999; pp. 1–50. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Peeten, H.M.G.; Shipper, E.; Shipper, J.K.; Baarveld, H.R. Netherlands Catalogue of Potato Varieties; NIVAP: Den Haag, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Lenartowicz, T. Descriptive List of Agricultural Plant Varieties 2020; COBORU: Słupia Wielka, Poland, 2020; pp. 11–41. (In Polish)
- Ryzak, M.; Bartmiński, P.; Bieganowski, A. Methods of determination of granulometric distribution of mineral soils. Acta Agroph. Theses Monogr. 2009, 175, 97. [Google Scholar]
- PN-R-BS 0403: 1997. Chemical and Agricultural Analysis of Soil. Sampling; Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland; Polish Accreditation Committee: Warsaw, Poland, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- KQ/PB-34 version 04 from 07.10.2011, 2011.
- PN-R-04023: 1996. Chemical and Agricultural Analysis of Soil. Determination of Available Phosphorus Content in Mineral Soils; Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- PN-R-04022: 1996 + AZ1: 2002. Chemical and Agricultural Analysis of Soil. Determination of Available Potassium Content in Mineral Soils; Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- PN-R-04017: 1992. Content of Copper Soluble in HCl in Mineral soil; Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- PN-R-04019: 1993. Content of Manganese Soluble in HCl in Mineral Soil; Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- PN-R-04021: 1994. The Content of Iron Soluble in HCl in Mineral Soil; Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Nawrocki, S. Zalecenia Nawozowe. Część I. Liczby Graniczne do Wyceny Zawartości w Glebach Makro-i Mikroelementów; Wyd. IUNG: Puławy, Poland, 1985; 38p. [Google Scholar]
- PN-A-74780:1996. Potato Products. Fried Potato Snacks; Polish Accreditation Committee: Warsaw, Poland, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- EN ISO 8586:2014-03. Sensory Analysis—General Guidelines for the Selection, Training and Monitoring of Selected Assessors and Sensory Evaluation Experts. Available online: https://sklep.pkn.pl/pn-en-iso-8586-2014-03e.html (accessed on 20 November 2020).
- PN-A-74702:1978. Potato Food Products. Testing Methods; Polish Accreditation Committee: Warsaw, Poland, 1978. [Google Scholar]
- PN-A-74780. Processed Potatoes. They Have Potato Snacks; Polish Accreditation Committee: Warsaw, Poland, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- ISO 4121:2003. Sensory Analysis—Guidelines for the Use of Quantitative Response Scales. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/33817.html (accessed on 20 November 2020).
- ISO 8589:2007. Sensory Analysis—General Guidelines for the Design of Test Rooms. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/36385.html (accessed on 20 November 2020).
- PN-EN 12145:2001—Fruit and Vegetable Products—Preparation of Samples and Physicochemical Test Methods—Determination of Dry Matter Content by Gravimetry; Polish Accreditation Committee: Warsaw, Poland, 2001.
- Skowera, B.; Kopcińska, J.; Kopeć, B. Changes in thermal and precipitation conditions in Poland in 1971–2010. Ann. Warsaw Univ. Life Sci.—SGGW Land Reclam. 2014, 46, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT®9.2 User’s Guide; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Pripp, A.H. Statistics in Food Science and Nutrition, SpringerBriefs in Food, Health, and Nutrition; Richard, W.H., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; Dordrecht, The Netherlands; London, UK, 2013; p. 72. ISBN1 978-1-4614-5009. ISBN2 978-1-4614-5010-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kołodziejczyk, M. Effect of nitrogen fertilization and microbial preparations on quality and storage losses in edible potato. Acta Agroph. 2016, 23, 67–78. [Google Scholar]
- Pszczółkowski, P.; Sawicka, B. The effect of application of biopreparations and fungicides on the yield and selected parameters of seed value of seed potatoes. Acta Agroph. 2018, 25, 239–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pszczółkowski, P.; Sawicka, B. Influence of the use of fungicides, microbiological preparations and herbal extracts on the shaping of the potato yield. Fragm. Agron. 2018, 35, 17–28. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- PN-R-74456: 1999. Root Crops—Potato Quality Test; Polish Accreditation Committee: Warsaw, Poland, 1999. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Zgórska, K.; Frydecka-Mazurczyk, A. Usefulness of new Polish potato varieties for food processing. Zeszyty Problemowe PostępówNauk Rolniczych 2002, 489, 347–354. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Mozolewski, W. Research on Relations between the Quality of Potato Varieties and the Quality of PC and FF; Spread. Monogr.; Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski: Olsztyn, Poland, 2005; p. 77. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Tajner-Czopek, A.; Kita, A.; Lisińska, G. Acrylamide content in French fries depending on the temperature and frying time. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych 2008, 530, 371–379. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Mestdagh, F.; Wilde, T.; Castelein, P.; Németh, O.; Van Peteghem, C.; Meulenaer, B. Impact of the reducing sugars on the relationship between acrylamide and Maillard browning in French fries. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2008, 227, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palazoğlu, T.K.; Gökmen, V. Reduction of acrylamide level in French fries by employing a temperature program during frying. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 6162–6166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boligłowa, E.; Gleń, K. Assessment of effective microorganism activity (EM) in winter wheat protection against fungal diseases. Ecol. Chem. Eng. A 2008, 15, 23–27. [Google Scholar]
- Kondratowicz-Pietruszka, E.; Ostasz, L.; Tataruch, K. Dynamics of oxidative changes in selected fats during frying. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2019, 18, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patsioura, A.; Vauvre, J.M.; Kesteloot, R.; Smith, P.; Trystram, G.; Vitrac, O. Chapter 17. Oil extraction mechanisms in French fries. Adv. Potato Chem. Technol. 2016, 503–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vauvre, J.M.; Kesteloot, R.; Patsioura, A.; Vitrac, O. Microscopic mechanisms of oil absorption in fried products. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2014, 116, 741–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhital, B.; Shrestha, S.; Kaphle, K.; Pudasaini, R. Distribution of the cattle ticks from mid hills to plains of Nepal. J. Agric. Nat. Res. 2018, 1, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Moreira, R.G. Vacuum frying versus conventional frying—An overview. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2014, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arias-Mendez, A.; Warning, A.; Datta, A.; Balsa-Canto, E. Optimal quality and safety of deep-fat frying French fries. J. Food Eng. 2013, 119, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Year of Research | Content Macronutrients [mg·100 g−1 Soil] | Humus Content [g·kg−1] | pH [KCL] | Micronutrients Content [mg·kg−1 Soil] | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | K | Mg | Cu | Mn | Zn | Fe | B | |||
2015 | 8.9 | 10.9 | 7.8 | 0.94 | 5.9 | 7.51 | 318 | 40.1 | 3760 | 7.24 |
2016 | 8.3 | 9.1 | 7.0 | 1.06 | 5.8 | 4.92 | 337 | 56.7 | 3925 | 5.28 |
2017 | 10.6 | 9.8 | 6.3 | 1.03 | 6.6 | 8.99 | 166 | 41.1 | 3600 | 6.04 |
Mean | 9.3 | 9.9 | 7.0 | 1.02 | - | 7.02 | 274 | 46.0 | 3762 | 6.17 |
Month | Years | ||
---|---|---|---|
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | |
April | 2.3 | 1.6 | 2.1 |
May | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
June | 0.9 | 1.5 | 0.4 |
July | 0.8 | 1.8 | 2.2 |
August | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.4 |
September | 2.8 | 0.3 | 1.9 |
Experimental Factors | Color [9° Scale] | Taste & Smell [5° Scale] | General Appearance [5° Scale] | Moisture [%] | Wet Places [%] | Defects and Discoloration [%] | Fat Content [%] | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EM Technology | Control object | 7.2b ± 1.39 | 3.9a ± 5.13 | 3.6a ± 5.56 | 2.1b ± 9.53 | 2.3b ± 9.52 | 3.0c ± 12.24 | 25.9a ± 6.18 |
I Exposition | 7.6a ± 2.63 | 3.8a ± 5.26 | 3.7a ± 5.41 | 2.2a ± 9.09 | 3.6a ± 9.09 | 4.9b ± 6.12 | 23.9b ± 5.44 | |
II Exposition | 7.4a ± 2.70 | 3.7a ± 2.70 | 3.7a ± 2.70 | 2.0c ± 9.00 | 1.9c ± 9.00 | 7.12a ± 4.23 | 23.9b ± 5.69 | |
HSD p0.05 | 0.3 | ns | ns | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.8 | |
Cultivars | ‘Krasa’ | 6.3b ± 1.59 | 2.8c ± 3.62 | 2.9b ± 6.84 | 2.6a ± 11.54 | 3.4b ± 2.94 | 5.1c ± 3.92 | 27.4a ± 6.20 |
‘Nora’ | 7.4a ± 2.71 | 3.8a ± 2.65 | 3.3b ± 3.07 | 2.1 a ± 9.52 | 6.6a ± 6.06 | 2.7d ± 3.70 | 23.6b ± 5.93 | |
‘Nicola’ | 6.9ab ± 1.46 | 3.3b ± 6.00 | 2.9b ± 3.48 | 2.6a ± 11.54 | 5.0a ± 8.50 | 4.4c ± 18.18 | 24.0b ± 5.00 | |
‘Bellarosa’ | 7.6a ± 3.95 | 3.7a ± 5.43 | 4.1a ± 2.42 | 2.4a ± 8.32 | 2.6c ± 11.54 | 4.9c ± 2.04 | 25.2b ± 5.95 | |
‘Vineta’ | 7.5a ± 2.67 | 3.7a ± 5.37 | 3.5b ± 2.83 | 1.6b ± 6.25 | 1.7c ± 6.00 | 3.0d ± 3.33 | 25.3b ± 6.32 | |
‘Roxana’ | 7.9a ± 1.27 | 3.8a ± 2.66 | 3.9a ± 5.09 | 2.1a ± 14.29 | 1.7c ± 5.88 | 3.6c ± 8.33 | 21.9c ± 5.48 | |
‘Red Fantasy’ | 7.8a ± 1.29 | 4.4a ± 2.29 | 4.2a ± 2.37 | 2.4a ± 8.33 | 1.1d ± 9.09 | 4.2c ± 4.76 | 21.2c ± 5.19 | |
‘Czapla’ | 6.9ab ± 2.89 | 3.8a ± 5.26 | 4.0a ± 5.06 | 1.7b ± 11.76 | 0.0d ± 10.00 | 19.0a ± 9.47 | 30.1a ± 6.98 | |
Oktan | 7.3a ± 3.00 | 4.1a ± 2.43 | 4.1a ± 7.23 | 1.7b ± 11.76 | 1.3c ± 7.69 | 5.6b ± 16.07 | 23.5b ± 4.68 | |
‘Ewelina’ | 7.6a ± 2.65 | 3.5b ± 2.83 | 3.1b ± 6.39 | 2.2a ± 4.5 | 3.3b ± 9.09 | 5.7b ± 7.02 | 24.4b ± 6.15 | |
‘Jelly’ | 7.6a ± 1.32 | 4.5a ± 4.49 | 4.5a ± 2.20 | 1.9b ± 5.26 | 0.6d ± 16.67 | 2.2d ± 4.55 | 24.2b ± 5.37 | |
‘Zuzanna’ | 7.6a ± 2.62 | 4.2a ± 9.62 | 3.8a ± 5.24 | 2.2a ± 9.09 | 3.2b ± 9.38 | 1.6d ± 6.25 | 24.1b ± 5.39 | |
‘Hinga’ | 7.6a ± 1.31 | 3.8a ± 5.29 | 4.0a ± 4.95 | 1.7b ± 7.08 | 0.6d ± 16.67 | 1.2e ± 8.33 | 25.4b ± 6.30 | |
‘Korona’ | 7.2a ± 2.79 | 3.3b ± 3.04 | 3.1b ± 6.47 | 2.1a ± 9.52 | 5.4a ± 9.26 | 7.0b ± 12.86 | 23.5b ± 5.96 | |
HSD p0.05 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 3.7 | |
Years | 2015 | 7.3a ± 1.37 | 3.7a ± 5.41 | 3.7a ± 5.41 | 2.0c ± 9.00 | 2.4c ± 9.00 | 4.3c ± 12.93 | 24.0b ± 5.42 |
2016 | 7.4a ± 2.70 | 3.8a ± 2.63 | 3.7a ± 5.41 | 2.1b ± 9.52 | 2.6a ± 9.52 | 4.7b ± 6.12 | 24.2b ± 6.03 | |
2017 | 7.4a ± 2.69 | 3.8a ± 5.00 | 3.6a ± 2.78 | 2.2a ± 9.09 | 2.8a ± 09.08 | 5.9a ± 4.23 | 25.5a ± 5.88 | |
HSD p0.05 | ns * | ns | ns | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.8 | |
Average | 7.4 ± 2.25 | 3.8 ± 4.36 | 3.7 ± 4.55 | 2.1 ± 9.20 | 2.6 ± 9.20 | 5.0 ± 7.77 | 24.6 ± 5.78 |
Trait | Significance of the Influence | Percentage of Variance Share in the Total Variance (Phenotypical One) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Varieties | Years | Technology | Varieties × Technology | Technology × Years | Varieties × Years × Technology | Varieties | Years | Technology | Varieties × Technology | Technology × Years | Varieties × Years × Technology | |
Color [9° scale] | ** | ns *** | * | ** | ** | ** | 37.6 | 3.7 | 8.5 | 20.8 | 12.1 | 18.1 |
Taste & smell [%] | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns | ** | 35.1 | 6.2 | 5.2 | 6.1 | 5.8 | 41.0 |
General appearance [5° scale] | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns | ** | 33.4 | 4.5 | 5.1 | 5.9 | 6.3 | 44.2 |
Moisture [%] | ** | * | ns | ns | ns | ** | 32.6 | 8.3 | 3.8 | 5.9 | 7.0 | 41.9 |
Wet places [%] | ** | ** | * | ns | ns | ** | 28.8 | 14.3 | 10.1 | 7.1 | 8.5 | 31.7 |
Defects & discolorations [%] | ** | ** | ** | ns | ns | ** | 23.7 | 15.8 | 10.6 | 6.6 | 6.1 | 30.9 |
Fat content [%] | ** | ** | ** | ns | ns | ** | 37.9 | 24.6 | 13.7 | 5.3 | 6.1 | 12.1 |
Experimental Factors | Color [9° Scale] | Consistency [5° Scale] | General Appearance [5° Scale] | Taste & Smell [5° Scale] | Moisture [%] | Fat Content [%] | Dark Ends [%] | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EM Technology | Control object | 4.2a ± 4.46 | 3.7a ± 4.16 | 4.1a ± 4.16 | 3.9a ± 4.17 | 2.3b ± 4.17 | 18.1a ± 2.76 | 5.6a ± 7.69 |
I Exposition | 4.1a ± 4.37 | 3.6a ± 7.11 | 4.2a ± 5.57 | 3.8a ± 10.53 | 2.3b ± 10.53 | 18.0a ± 3.85 | 2.9b ± 10.53 | |
II Exposition | 4.2a ± 2.38 | 3.7a ± 7.12 | 4.2a ± 5.48 | 3.8a ± 7.89 | 2.6a ± 7.89 | 17.8b ± 3.85 | 2.6c ± 7.89 | |
HSD p0.05 | ns * | ns | ns | ns | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | |
Cultivars9.00 | ‘Krasa’ | 3.6b ± 2.78 | 2.6c ± 3.85 | 3.5b ± 2.57 | 3.3b ± 3.07 | 2.6a ± 7.11 | 18.2a ± 2.75 | 19.1a ± 3.66 |
‘Nora’ | 4.1 ± 7.42 | 2.8c ± 10.87 | 4.1a ± 7.26 | 3.5b ± 2.87 | 2.4a ± 7.50 | 18.6a ± 3.23 | 6.0b ± 9.00 | |
‘Nicola’ | 4.2a ± 4.76 | 3.6b ± 8.31 | 4.2a ± 4.77 | 3.8a ± 5.24 | 2.9a ± 3.83 | 17.6b ± 2.27 | 3.4cd ± 9.12 | |
‘Bellarosa’ | 3.8b ± 2.61 | 2.8c ± 7.06 | 4.0a ± 2.50 | 3.5b ± 5.70 | 2.0b ± 10.84 | 17.8b ± 2.81 | 4.8c ± 8.33 | |
‘Vineta’ | 4.3a ± 2.34 | 3.7b ± 8.14 | 4.2a ± 2.41 | 3.9a ± 7.68 | 2.2b ± 13.94 | 17.4b ± 2.30 | 1.4f ± 7.14 | |
‘Roxana’ | 4.4a ± 4.53 | 3.1b ± 6.55 | 4.4a ± 2.26 | 3.9a ± 5.14 | 2.1b ± 7.88 | 17.9a ± 2.79 | 1.4f ± 7.14 | |
‘Red Fantasy’ | 4.5a ± 4.47 | 3.9b ± 10.15 | 4.3a ± 7.04 | 3.7b ± 8.11 | 2.8a ± 3.80 | 17.2b ± 2.33 | 0.1h ± 5.00 | |
‘Czapla’ | 4.0a ± 2.48 | 3.1b ± 9.56 | 4.2a ± 4.77 | 3.6b ± 2.75 | 2.4a ± 7.77 | 17.8b ± 2.81 | 1.9e ± 15.79 | |
‘Oktan’ | 4.7a ± 4.24 | 4.9a ± 6.19 | 4.6a ± 4.34 | 4.7a ± 6.37 | 2.6a ± 3.58 | 18.7a ± 3.74 | 2.1e ± 4.76 | |
‘Ewelina’ | 4.3a ± 2.34 | 3.8b ± 2.61 | 4.4a ± 2.29 | 3.9a ± 12.98 | 2.7a ± 12.00 | 17.7b ± 2.26 | 3.0d ± 6.67 | |
‘Jelly’ | 4.0a ± 2.47 | 4.3a ± 2.31 | 3.7b ± 13.59 | 3.8ab ± 10.61 | 2.6a ± 11.65 | 18.5a ± 3.78 | 0.6g ± 16.67 | |
‘Zuzanna’ | 4.6a ± 4.35 | 4.9a ± 2.02 | 4.8a ± 6.27 | 4.7a ± 4.23 | 1.9b ± 12.18 | 18.0a ± 3.33 | 0.7g ± 14.29 | |
‘Hinga’ | 4.1a ± 2.42 | 4.3a ± 4.62 | 4.3a ± 6.91 | 3.9a ± 5.17 | 1.9b ± 8.02 | 17.1b ± 1.75 | 2.4e ± 8.33 | |
‘Korona’ | 3.9b ± 5.13 | 2.8c ± 3.54 | 4.0a ± 5.4 | 3.6b ± 12.00 | 2.8a ± 3.77 | 19.0a ± 4.74 | 5.0c ± 6.00 | |
HSD p0.05 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 | |
Years | 2015 | 4.2a ± 4.50 | 3.6a ± 4.17 | 4.2a ± 4.17 | 3.9a ± 7.70 | 2.3b ± 4.17 | 17.9b ± 3.35 | 3.4c ± 7.70 |
2016 | 4.2a ± 4.40 | 3.6a ± 7.08 | 4.2a ± 5.57 | 3.8a6.58 | 2.4b ± 10.55 | 18.0b ± 2.78 | 3.7b ± 10.52 | |
2017 | 4.3a ± 2.32 | 3.7a ± 7.11 | 4.3a ± 5.58 | 3.8a ± 5.50 | 2.5a ± 7.88 | 18.2a ± 2.75 | 4.0a ± 7.90 | |
HSD p0.05 | ns | ns | ns | ns | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | |
Average | 4.2 ± 3.74 | 3.6 ± 6.13 | 4.2 ± 5.12 | 3.8 ± 6.50 | 2.4 ± 7.58 | 18.0 ± 2.92 | 3.7 ± 8.71 |
Trait | Significance of the Influence | Percentage of Variance Share in the Total Variance (Phenotypical One) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Varieties | Years | Technology | Varieties × Technology | Varieties × Years | Varieties × Years × Technology | Varieties | Years | Technology | Technology × Varieties | Varieties × Years | Varieties × Years × Technology | |
Color [9° scale] | ** | ns *** | ns | ns | ns | ** | 35.6 | 3.7 | 13.5 | 4.8 | 7.1 | 34.1 |
Consistency [5° scale] | ** | ns | ns | ns | ** | ** | 35.3 | 4.1 | 6.2 | 4.0 | 9.8 | 40.2 |
General appearance [5° scale] | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns | ** | 32.0 | 5.8 | 6.5 | 5.9 | 6.3 | 42.4 |
Taste & smell [%] | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns | ** | 35.9 | 5.6 | 4.5 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 40.9 |
Moisture [%] | ** | * | * | ns | ns | ** | 25.1 | 15.4 | 12.1 | 7.3 | 5.5 | 30.7 |
Fat content [%] | ** | * | ** | ns | ns | ** | 28.6 | 14.3 | 13.4 | 5.6 | 5.1 | 30.9 |
Dark ends [%] | ** | ** | ** | ns | ns | ** | 36.8 | 20.7 | 15.6 | 5.3 | 6.2 | 12.6 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sawicka, B.; Pszczółkowski, P.; Kiełtyka-Dadasiewicz, A.; Barbaś, P.; Ćwintal, M.; Krochmal-Marczak, B. The Effect of Effective Microorganisms on the Quality of Potato Chips and French Fries. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041415
Sawicka B, Pszczółkowski P, Kiełtyka-Dadasiewicz A, Barbaś P, Ćwintal M, Krochmal-Marczak B. The Effect of Effective Microorganisms on the Quality of Potato Chips and French Fries. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(4):1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041415
Chicago/Turabian StyleSawicka, Barbara, Piotr Pszczółkowski, Anna Kiełtyka-Dadasiewicz, Piotr Barbaś, Marek Ćwintal, and Barbara Krochmal-Marczak. 2021. "The Effect of Effective Microorganisms on the Quality of Potato Chips and French Fries" Applied Sciences 11, no. 4: 1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041415
APA StyleSawicka, B., Pszczółkowski, P., Kiełtyka-Dadasiewicz, A., Barbaś, P., Ćwintal, M., & Krochmal-Marczak, B. (2021). The Effect of Effective Microorganisms on the Quality of Potato Chips and French Fries. Applied Sciences, 11(4), 1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041415