Next Article in Journal
Investigation of a Solar-Driven Organic Rankine Cycle with Reheating
Next Article in Special Issue
A Potential “Vitaminic Strategy” against Caries and Halitosis
Previous Article in Journal
Modelling Automated Planning Problems for Teams of Mobile Manipulators in a Generic Industrial Scenario
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dracocephalum palmatum S. and Dracocephalum ruyschiana L. Originating from Yakutia: A High-Resolution Mass Spectrometric Approach for the Comprehensive Characterization of Phenolic Compounds
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Beneficial Effects of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester on Wound Healing in a Diabetic Mouse: Role of VEGF and NO

1
Cardiovascular Research Institute for Intractable Disease, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea
2
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea
3
College of Pharmacy, Mokpo National University, Muan-gun 58554, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(5), 2320; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12052320
Submission received: 14 January 2022 / Revised: 14 February 2022 / Accepted: 21 February 2022 / Published: 23 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Natural Bioactive Compounds and Biological Effects)

Abstract

:
Cutaneous wound healing is delayed in patients with diabetes. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) has been identified as an effective constituent of propolis with improved wound healing abilities via an oxidative stress decrease. However, its impact on wound healing in diabetic models and its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Determining the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) contents in a human vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC)-conditioned medium was assessed using human VEGF immunoassay and vascular reactivity using porcine coronary artery rings. Later, C57BL/6 or db/db mice were anesthetized, after which a 6-mm biopsy punch was manipulated for perforation via the back skin. Subsequently, CAPE was applied to the wound and changed daily. Furthermore, the injury in each mouse was digitally photographed, and the wound area was quantified. We observed that CAPE increased VEGF levels in human VSMC-conditioned medium, improved endothelium-dependent nitric oxide (NO)-mediated vasorelaxation, inhibited U46619-induced vasoconstriction porcine coronary artery, and enhanced cutaneous wound healing in the diabetic mouse model. Hence, we propose that CAPE improves wound healing in diabetic mice, which is aided by increased VEGF and NO expression.

1. Introduction

Delayed cutaneous wound healing is a common feature in patients with diabetes caused by continuous inflammation, which is commonly observed during diabetic ulceration [1]. Specifically, foot ulceration is a major complication in patients with diabetes [2]. Thus, patients with diabetes have a 25% risk of foot ulcers for their whole life [3], resulting in 50~70% of whole, nontraumatic amputations [4,5,6]. Recently, the rate of amputation has increased, which has led to increased morbidity and mortality [7,8,9,10]. Therefore, the cure for diabetic foot ulcers remains a significant issue, including developing therapies that enhance wound healing in these patients [11].
Propolis, a substance gathered by honeybees to protect their hive from fungal and bacterial infections [12,13], has been used as a medicine from time immemorial [14]. In humans, propolis has been suggested as an effective topical therapy for ulcers and its use for treatment has been approved, especially in Australasia [15]. Moreover, it has been recently reported that the topical application of propolis is well tolerated and facilitates the healing of human diabetic foot ulcers [16]. However, despite the rising use of propolis, the active components in this substance and the exact underlying mechanism of diabetic wound healing have not been explored.
Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) is a principally active component of propolis [17]. It is proposed that CAPE has immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant effects, and inhibits lipid peroxidation [17,18,19,20]. However, even though CAPE accelerates cutaneous wound healing via antioxidant effects [21], and enhances wound contraction and re-epithelialization by decreasing oxidative stress [22], it has not been reported whether it improves cutaneous wound healing in a diabetic model. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the effect of CAPE on cutaneous wound healing in a diabetic mouse model, after which we elucidated its possible underlying mechanisms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

CAPE was purchased from Bachem (catalog no. Q-2305). However, unless otherwise specified, all other materials were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.2. Determination of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)

Human aortic vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) were obtained from Clonetics and cultured as recommended. VSMCs from passages 5–15 were then exposed to a serum-free culture medium containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (QBiogene) for 24 h before treatment. Subsequently, the VEGF content was estimated in human VSMC-conditioned medium (24 h) using human VEGF immunoassay (R&D system).

2.3. Vascular Reactivity

As demonstrated previously, the vascular reactivity study was conducted using left anterior descending coronary arteries from pig hearts (acquired from a local slaughterhouse in Mokpo, Republic of Korea) [23]. In brief, after removing the connective tissue, the dissected arteries were cut into rings (4–5 mm). Then, to evaluate the alterations in isometric tension, the rings were placed in organ baths containing 10 mL oxygenated (95% O2 and 5% CO2) Krebs bicarbonate solution (composition in mM: NaCl 119, KCl 4.7, KH2PO4 1.18, MgSO4 1.18, CaCl2 1.25, NaHCO3 25, and D-glucose 11, pH 7.4) at 37 °C. After equilibration for 90 min at a resting tension of 5 g, the rings were contracted with KCl-containing Krebs solution (80 mM). Following a 30-min washout, the rings were contracted with U46619 (thromboxane mimetic, 1–60 nM) to ~80% of the maximal contraction produced by the KCl-containing Krebs solution before adding bradykinin (0.3 μM) to verify the endothelial function. After washout and 30-min equilibration, the rings were subsequently contracted with U46619 once more before constructing a concentration–relaxation curve for CAPE. In some examinations, the rings were pretreated with pharmacological inhibitors for 30 min before adding the U46619. However, in others, the rings were incubated with CAPE (10 μM, 100 μM) for 5 min before constructing the concentration–contraction curve for U46619.

2.4. Wound Biopsy and Assessment of Wound Closure

This study was conducted on C57BLKS/J m+/m+ or db/db male mice (10 weeks old) obtained from the National Taiwan University Animal Center. All animal experiments were performed according to National Institutes of Health guidelines and were approved by the Laboratory Animal Committee of the College of Medicine, Catholic University (IRB no. CUMC-2012-0077-01). Subsequently, the mice were anesthetized using a 2% injection comprising Rompun solution (0.1 mL/20 g body wt). Then, the back of the mouse was trimmed, and an alcohol swab was used to accomplish sterilization. Subsequently, a 6-mm biopsy punch was used to punch the mouse’s back skin. The mouse would be unable to touch a wound in this area to avoid self-licking. Afterward, to determine whether CAPE improved cutaneous wound healing in a diabetic condition, 35% EtOH saline alone or that containing 20 μL of 5 mM CAPE was applied to the wound at the back of C57LBKS/J db/db mice, twice daily for 21 d. Furthermore, 35% EtOH saline, used as a vehicle for CAPE administration, was applied to the wound on the back of C57BKS/J m+/m+ mice to examine whether the vehicle affected wound healing compared with the untreated mice. Finally, injuries in individual mice were digitally photographed on days 0, 3, 7, 14, and 21 post wounding, after which the wound area was estimated using Scion software v4.0 (Scion Corporation, Frederick, MD, USA).

2.5. Statistical Evaluation

The values were expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). Statistical assessment was conducted with 2-way analysis of variance, followed by Fischer’s protected least significant difference test wherever appropriate. Values of p < 0.05 were regarded statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. CAPE Increases the Release of VEGF from VSMCs

Wound angiogenesis plays a critical role in the proliferative phase of healing [2,24]. Moreover, studies have reported that VEGF is the main factor in angiogenesis processes, and is particularly associated with wound repair [24]. Therefore, the effect of CAPE on VEGF’s dose-dependent release in human VSMCs was assessed. The exposure of VSMCs to CAPE for 24 h raised the basal release of VEGF, with significantly increased levels observed at doses >3 μM, reaching approximately 441% at 30 μM, which was comparable to the effect of platelet-derived growth factors (PDGF) at 30 ng/mL (Figure 1).

3.2. CAPE Causes Endothelium-Dependent NO-Mediated Vasorelaxation and Inhibits U46619-Induced Vasoconstriction in Porcine Coronary Arteries

It has previously been suggested that blood supply to foot ulcers in patients with diabetes is diminished owing to the decline in NO formation by vascular endothelial cells (ECs) [25]. Moreover, improved endothelium-dependent vasodilation has been shown to be associated with vascular repair and re-endothelialization in diabetic animal models [26]. Based on such reports, we conducted a vascular reactivity study to investigate the effect of CAPE on vascular function and subsequently elucidate the underlying mechanisms. The results showed that CAPE induced the relaxation of isolated porcine coronary artery rings with endothelium (but not of those without endothelium) in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 2a). The relaxation responses were 12.9 ± 4.6%, 34.7 ± 8.2%, and 75.6 ± 8.3% at concentrations of 3, 10, and 30 μμM, respectively. CAPE relaxation was also significantly reduced by Nω-nitro-L-arginine (L-NA, a NO synthase inhibitor) and 1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-α]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ), a guanylyl cyclase inhibitor. Alternatively, indomethacin (INDO), a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, and tetraethylammonium (TEA), a potassium channel blocker, did not inhibit the relaxation induced by CAPE (Figure 2b). These findings indicate that CAPE-induced vasorelaxation of the porcine coronary artery rings depended on vascular endothelium, and was mainly mediated by the NO/cGMP pathway.
Additionally, this study showed that CAPE inhibited U46619-induced contraction. As observed, the treatment of porcine coronary artery rings with 10 μM and 100 μM CAPE for 5 min before adding the increasing concentrations of U46619 attenuated the contractions significantly (Figure 3).

3.3. CAPE Enhances Cutaneous Wound Healing in a Diabetic Mouse Model

The wound area in the diabetic mice treated with CAPE was smaller than that in the diabetic mice treated only with 35% EtOH saline (Figure 4a). The areas of the wound expressed as percentages of the initial wound area treated with CAPE were 38.7% and 16.1% on days 7 and 14, respectively, whereas the areas of the wound treated only with 35% EtOH saline were 76.1% and 65.1% on the same days (Figure 4b). Therefore, to examine whether 35% EtOH saline affected wound healing in nondiabetic mice, it was applied on the wound in nondiabetic mice. We observed that the areas of the injuries treated with 35% EtOH saline were 58.0% and 20.7% on days 3 and 7, respectively, whereas the areas of the untreated wounds were 90.1% and 52.2% (Figure 4b). Although 35% EtOH saline improved wound healing in nondiabetic mice to a certain degree, the results suggest that CAPE significantly enhanced cutaneous wound healing in diabetic mice.

4. Discussion

Propolis has been suggested to exert immunomodulatory, antiulcer, antidiabetic [27], and tissue healing/improvement effects [28,29,30,31]. The constituent compounds of propolis are apigenin, galangin, kaempferol, myricetin, pinocembrin, quercetin, and CAPE [15]. Among these, CAPE has been identified as the principal compound of propolis and has been reported to have anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and tissue-repair properties [17,18,19,20]. CAPE has also been proposed to improve diabetic wound healing. Furthermore, several studies have suggested that CAPE attenuated the inflammatory response to periodontal pathogens via NF-κB inhibition [32], and that it exerted positive effects on gingival wound healing in nondiabetic Wistar albino rats [33]. In diabetic rats induced by streptozotocin, CAPE also diminished pancreatic oxidative stress by acting as a heme oxygenase-1 inducer [34] and had beneficial effects on the brain by decreasing oxidative damage and inflammation [35].
Foot ulceration is a major complication in patients with diabetes [4,5,6]. The problem occurs in at least 15% of these patients, making it the reason for 50~70% of nontraumatic amputations. Foot ulceration has also been associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and decreased quality of patients’ lives [7,8]. Thus, developing therapies for foot ulcers in patients with diabetes is imperative [11]. This investigation is the first to identify the effects of CAPE on cutaneous wound healing in a diabetic mouse model. In this study, we observed that CAPE accelerated cutaneous diabetic wound healing. This protective effect was associated with, at least in part, the induction of VEGF release in VSMCs and the relaxation of the artery via the NO/cGMP pathway.
Furthermore, angiogenesis is essential for wound healing as it helps in the delivery of nutrients, oxygen, and other molecules, thereby participating in the wound healing process [36]. In patients with diabetes, ECs are seriously defective in angiogenesis and cause an ischemic limb, which impairs wound healing [37]. Therefore, inducing angiogenesis in an ischemic limb can be key to improving the blood flow to the limb, consequently leading to healed limb wounds, which are delayed by diabetes-induced ischemia [38]. Additionally, VEGF is an important component that induces angiogenesis [39], produced by different cell types, such as VSMCs, fibroblasts, tumor cells, macrophages, and ECs [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. VEGF is involved in the angiogenic process, enhances microvascular permeability, and promotes EC survival, migration, proliferation, and matrix metalloproteinases secretion [48]. However, CAPE has a double aspect regarding VEGF. It has considerably been reported that CAPE inhibits the expression of VEGF and VEGF-induced angiogenesis [49]. Nevertheless, these findings have not been completely assessed in cancer cells. Our study showed that VEGF in cultured human VSMC-conditioned medium increased when CAPE was administered to the cells. According to our result, in the cells that are not cancerous or under insufficient VEGF or ischemia conditions, CAPE rather induces VEGF expression. Therefore, it is assumed that it acts as a regulator of homeostasis.
NO has also been reported to play crucial roles in wound healing [50]. NO induces angiogenesis [51,52] and the proliferation and migration of ECs [53]. Furthermore, CAPE has been proposed to enhance NO activity and prevent reactive oxygen species from degrading NO [54]. Moreover, investigations have suggested that sufficient NO production is needed for efficient wound healing and that topical NO treatment advances the closure of the excisional wounds in diabetic rats [55]. Additionally, worsened angiogenesis was observed in eNOS-deficient mice [56]. Besides, VEGF has been indicated to induce the upregulation of eNOS expression and endothelial NO production [57,58]. Similarly, NO influences vasorelaxation, which symbolizes increased blood flow. Increased blood flow to the limb accelerates the wound healing rate in the limb delayed by diabetes-derived ischemia [38]. Likewise, this study demonstrated that CAPE induced endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation in isolated porcine coronary artery rings. The inhibitor of NO synthase and guanylyl cyclase, but not the potassium channel blocker and inhibitor of cyclooxygenase, strongly inhibited this vasorelaxant effect of CAPE. This result suggests that CAPE caused an endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation mainly by mediating the NO-sGC-cGMP pathway. Taken together, CAPE can contribute to improved wound healing, at least in part, via the blood flow increase caused by NO-mediated vasorelaxation.
Nevertheless, further studies are needed to demonstrate how CAPE induces the expression of VEGF. Follow-up studies on the detailed mechanism are also required.

5. Conclusions

CAPE had a potent wound healing effect on the diabetic mouse model, which we speculate to have been caused by an increase in the expressions of NO and VEGF. Therefore, CAPE is suggested as a potential candidate for the treatment of foot ulceration in patients with diabetes.

Author Contributions

Methodology, investigation, data curation, S.-Y.S., E.-H.P., E.K., G.C.O., E.H.C. and B.-H.H.; data curation, validation, formal analysis, visualization, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, S.-H.P.; conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing, supervision and project administration, K.C. and M.-H.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by in part by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2020R1A4A3079570).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the National Institutes of Health guidelines, and the Laboratory Animal Committee of the College of Medicine, Catholic University approved the research (IRB no. CUMC-2012-0077-01).

Data Availability Statement

All the data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pierce, G.F. Inflammation in nonhealing diabetic wounds: The space-time continuum does matter. Am. J. Pathol. 2001, 159, 399–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mohammad, G.; Pandey, H.; Tripathi, K. Diabetic wound healing and its angiogenesis with special reference to nanoparticles. Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostruct. 2008, 3, 201–208. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lavery, L.A.; Armstrong, D.G.; Wunderlich, R.P.; Tredwell, J.; Boulton, A.J. Diabetic foot syndrome: Evaluating the prevalence and incidence of foot pathology in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites from a diabetes disease management cohort. Diabetes Care 2003, 26, 1435–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Falanga, V. Wound healing and its impairment in the diabetic foot. Lancet 2005, 366, 1736–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jeffcoate, W.J.; Harding, K.G. Diabetic foot ulcers. Lancet 2003, 361, 1545–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jeffcoate, W.J.; Price, P.; Harding, K.G. Wound healing and treatments for people with diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes/Metab. Res. Rev. 2004, 20 (Suppl. S1), S78–S89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Davis, W.A.; Norman, P.E.; Bruce, D.G.; Davis, T.M. Predictors, consequences and costs of diabetes-related lower extremity amputation complicating type 2 diabetes: The Fremantle Diabetes Study. Diabetologia 2006, 49, 2634–2641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ince, P.; Game, F.L.; Jeffcoate, W.J. Rate of healing of neuropathic ulcers of the foot in diabetes and its relationship to ulcer duration and ulcer area. Diabetes Care 2007, 30, 660–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ince, P.; Kendrick, D.; Game, F.; Jeffcoate, W. The association between baseline characteristics and the outcome of foot lesions in a UK population with diabetes. Diabet. Med. 2007, 24, 977–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schofield, C.J.; Libby, G.; Brennan, G.M.; MacAlpine, R.R.; Morris, A.D.; Leese, G.P. Mortality and hospitalization in patients after amputation: A comparison between patients with and without diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006, 29, 2252–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. McLennan, S.V.; Bonner, J.; Milne, S.; Lo, L.; Charlton, A.; Kurup, S.; Jia, J.; Yue, D.K.; Twigg, S.M. The anti-inflammatory agent Propolis improves wound healing in a rodent model of experimental diabetes. Wound Repair Regen. 2008, 16, 706–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Burdock, G.A. Review of the biological properties and toxicity of bee propolis (propolis). Food Chem. Toxicol. 1998, 36, 347–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ota, C.; Unterkircher, C.; Fantinato, V.; Shimizu, M.T. Antifungal activity of propolis on different species of Candida. Mycoses 2001, 44, 375–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gavanji, S.; Larki, B. Comparative effect of propolis of honey bee and some herbal extracts on Candida albicans. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 2017, 23, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wagh, V.D. Propolis: A wonder bees product and its pharmacological potentials. Adv. Pharmacol. Sci. 2013, 2013, 308249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Henshaw, F.R.; Bolton, T.; Nube, V.; Hood, A.; Veldhoen, D.; Pfrunder, L.; McKew, G.L.; Macleod, C.; McLennan, S.V.; Twigg, S.M. Topical application of the bee hive protectant propolis is well tolerated and improves human diabetic foot ulcer healing in a prospective feasibility study. J. Diabetes Its Complicat. 2014, 28, 850–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Khayyal, M.T.; el-Ghazaly, M.A.; el-Khatib, A.S. Mechanisms involved in the antiinflammatory effect of propolis extract. Drugs Under Exp. Clin. Res. 1993, 19, 197–203. [Google Scholar]
  18. Natarajan, K.; Singh, S.; Burke, T.R., Jr.; Grunberger, D.; Aggarwal, B.B. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester is a potent and specific inhibitor of activation of nuclear transcription factor NF-kappa B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 9090–9095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Pascual, C.; Gonzalez, R.; Torricella, R.G. Scavenging action of propolis extract against oxygen radicals. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1994, 41, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sud’ina, G.F.; Mirzoeva, O.K.; Pushkareva, M.A.; Korshunova, G.A.; Sumbatyan, N.V.; Varfolomeev, S.D. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester as a lipoxygenase inhibitor with antioxidant properties. FEBS Lett. 1993, 329, 21–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Serarslan, G.; Altuğ, E.; Kontas, T.; Atik, E.; Avci, G. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester accelerates cutaneous wound healing in a rat model and decreases oxidative stress. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2007, 32, 709–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Romana-Souza, B.; Dos Santos, J.S.; Monte-Alto-Costa, A. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester promotes wound healing of mice pressure ulcers affecting NF-κB, NOS2 and NRF2 expression. Life Sci. 2018, 207, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ndiaye, M.; Chataigneau, M.; Lobysheva, I.; Chataigneau, T.; Schini-Kerth, V.B. Red wine polyphenol-induced, endothelium-dependent NO-mediated relaxation is due to the redox-sensitive PI3-kinase/Akt-dependent phosphorylation of endothelial NO-synthase in the isolated porcine coronary artery. FASEB J. 2005, 19, 455–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Costa, P.Z.; Soares, R. Neovascularization in diabetes and its complications. Unraveling the angiogenic paradox. Life Sci. 2013, 92, 1037–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mikaili, P.; Moloudizargari, M.; Aghajanshakeri, S. Treatment with topical nitroglycerine may promote the healing process of diabetic foot ulcers. Med. Hypotheses 2014, 83, 172–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, F.Y.; Lam, K.S.; Tse, H.F.; Chen, C.; Wang, Y.; Vanhoutte, P.M.; Xu, A. Endothelium-selective activation of AMP-activated protein kinase prevents diabetes mellitus-induced impairment in vascular function and reendothelialization via induction of heme oxygenase-1 in mice. Circulation 2012, 126, 1267–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Sforcin, J.M.; Bankova, V. Propolis: Is there a potential for the development of new drugs? J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 133, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bretz, W.A.; Chiego, D.J., Jr.; Marcucci, M.C.; Cunha, I.; Custódio, A.; Schneider, L.G. Preliminary report on the effects of propolis on wound healing in the dental pulp. Z. Naturforschung. C J. Biosci. 1998, 53, 1045–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Gregory, S.R.; Piccolo, N.; Piccolo, M.T.; Piccolo, M.S.; Heggers, J.P. Comparison of propolis skin cream to silver sulfadiazine: A naturopathic alternative to antibiotics in treatment of minor burns. J. Altern. Complementary Med. 2002, 8, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Oztürk, F.; Kurt, E.; Cerçi, M.; Emiroglu, L.; Inan, U.; Türker, M.; Ilker, S. The effect of propolis extract in experimental chemical corneal injury. Ophthalmic Res. 2000, 32, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Oztürk, F.; Kurt, E.; Inan, U.U.; Emiroğlu, L.; Ilker, S.S. The effects of acetylcholine and propolis extract on corneal epithelial wound healing in rats. Cornea 1999, 18, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Stähli, A.; Maheen, C.U.; Strauss, F.J.; Eick, S.; Sculean, A.; Gruber, R. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester protects against oxidative stress and dampens inflammation via heme oxygenase 1. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2019, 11, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gül, M.; Dündar, S.; Artaş, G.; Yiğin, A.; Tanık, A.; Polat, M.E.; Özcan, E.C. The effect of caffeic acid phenethyl ester and Ankaferd Blood Stopper on the diabetic and nondiabetic gingival wound healing: An experimental study. Turk. J. Med. Sci. 2021, 51, 848–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sorrenti, V.; Raffaele, M.; Vanella, L.; Acquaviva, R.; Salerno, L.; Pittalà, V.; Intagliata, S.; Di Giacomo, C. Protective Effects of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester (CAPE) and Novel Cape Analogue as Inducers of Heme Oxygenase-1 in Streptozotocin-Induced Type 1 Diabetic Rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Celik, S.; Erdogan, S. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) protects brain against oxidative stress and inflammation induced by diabetes in rats. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2008, 312, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Martin, A.; Komada, M.R.; Sane, D.C. Abnormal angiogenesis in diabetes mellitus. Med. Res. Rev. 2003, 23, 117–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Brem, H.; Jacobs, T.; Vileikyte, L.; Weinberger, S.; Gibber, M.; Gill, K.; Tarnovskaya, A.; Entero, H.; Boulton, A.J. Wound-healing protocols for diabetic foot and pressure ulcers. Surg. Technol. Int. 2003, 11, 85–92. [Google Scholar]
  38. Gadau, S.; Emanueli, C.; Van Linthout, S.; Graiani, G.; Todaro, M.; Meloni, M.; Campesi, I.; Invernici, G.; Spillmann, F.; Ward, K.; et al. Benfotiamine accelerates the healing of ischaemic diabetic limbs in mice through protein kinase B/Akt-mediated potentiation of angiogenesis and inhibition of apoptosis. Diabetologia 2006, 49, 405–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Takeshita, S.; Zheng, L.P.; Brogi, E.; Kearney, M.; Pu, L.Q.; Bunting, S.; Ferrara, N.; Symes, J.F.; Isner, J.M. Therapeutic angiogenesis. A single intraarterial bolus of vascular endothelial growth factor augments revascularization in a rabbit ischemic hind limb model. J. Clin. Investig. 1994, 93, 662–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Brogi, E.; Wu, T.; Namiki, A.; Isner, J.M. Indirect angiogenic cytokines upregulate VEGF and bFGF gene expression in vascular smooth muscle cells, whereas hypoxia upregulates VEGF expression only. Circulation 1994, 90, 649–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ferrara, N.; Winer, J.; Burton, T. Aortic smooth muscle cells express and secrete vascular endothelial growth factor. Growth Factors 1991, 5, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Leung, D.W.; Cachianes, G.; Kuang, W.J.; Goeddel, D.V.; Ferrara, N. Vascular endothelial growth factor is a secreted angiogenic mitogen. Science 1989, 246, 1306–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Namiki, A.; Brogi, E.; Kearney, M.; Kim, E.A.; Wu, T.; Couffinhal, T.; Varticovski, L.; Isner, J.M. Hypoxia induces vascular endothelial growth factor in cultured human endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 31189–31195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Plate, K.H.; Breier, G.; Weich, H.A.; Risau, W. Vascular endothelial growth factor is a potential tumour angiogenesis factor in human gliomas in vivo. Nature 1992, 359, 845–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Shweiki, D.; Itin, A.; Soffer, D.; Keshet, E. Vascular endothelial growth factor induced by hypoxia may mediate hypoxia-initiated angiogenesis. Nature 1992, 359, 843–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Stavri, G.T.; Hong, Y.; Zachary, I.C.; Breier, G.; Baskerville, P.A.; Ylä-Herttuala, S.; Risau, W.; Martin, J.F.; Erusalimsky, J.D. Hypoxia and platelet-derived growth factor-BB synergistically upregulate the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in vascular smooth muscle cells. FEBS Lett. 1995, 358, 311–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Stavri, G.T.; Zachary, I.C.; Baskerville, P.A.; Martin, J.F.; Erusalimsky, J.D. Basic fibroblast growth factor upregulates the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in vascular smooth muscle cells. Synergistic interaction with hypoxia. Circulation 1995, 92, 11–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lohela, M.; Bry, M.; Tammela, T.; Alitalo, K. VEGFs and receptors involved in angiogenesis versus lymphangiogenesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2009, 21, 154–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wu, J.; Omene, C.; Karkoszka, J.; Bosland, M.; Eckard, J.; Klein, C.B.; Frenkel, K. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), derived from a honeybee product propolis, exhibits a diversity of anti-tumor effects in pre-clinical models of human breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 2011, 308, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Yamasaki, K.; Edington, H.D.; McClosky, C.; Tzeng, E.; Lizonova, A.; Kovesdi, I.; Steed, D.L.; Billiar, T.R. Reversal of impaired wound repair in iNOS-deficient mice by topical adenoviral-mediated iNOS gene transfer. J. Clin. Investig. 1998, 101, 967–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Leibovich, S.J.; Polverini, P.J.; Fong, T.W.; Harlow, L.A.; Koch, A.E. Production of angiogenic activity by human monocytes requires an L-arginine/nitric oxide-synthase-dependent effector mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 4190–4194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Ziche, M.; Morbidelli, L.; Masini, E.; Amerini, S.; Granger, H.J.; Maggi, C.A.; Geppetti, P.; Ledda, F. Nitric oxide mediates angiogenesis in vivo and endothelial cell growth and migration in vitro promoted by substance P. J. Clin. Investig. 1994, 94, 2036–2044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Morbidelli, L.; Chang, C.H.; Douglas, J.G.; Granger, H.J.; Ledda, F.; Ziche, M. Nitric oxide mediates mitogenic effect of VEGF on coronary venular endothelium. Am. J. Physiol. 1996, 270, H411–H415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wright, E., Jr.; Scism-Bacon, J.L.; Glass, L.C. Oxidative stress in type 2 diabetes: The role of fasting and postprandial glycaemia. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2006, 60, 308–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Witte, M.B.; Kiyama, T.; Barbul, A. Nitric oxide enhances experimental wound healing in diabetes. Br. J. Surg. 2002, 89, 1594–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Lee, P.C.; Salyapongse, A.N.; Bragdon, G.A.; Shears, L.L., 2nd; Watkins, S.C.; Edington, H.D.; Billiar, T.R. Impaired wound healing and angiogenesis in eNOS-deficient mice. Am. J. Physiol. 1999, 277, H1600–H1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hood, J.D.; Meininger, C.J.; Ziche, M.; Granger, H.J. VEGF upregulates ecNOS message, protein, and NO production in human endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. 1998, 274, H1054–H1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Papapetropoulos, A.; García-Cardeña, G.; Madri, J.A.; Sessa, W.C. Nitric oxide production contributes to the angiogenic properties of vascular endothelial growth factor in human endothelial cells. J. Clin. Investig. 1997, 100, 3131–3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The dose-dependent effect of CAPE on the expression of VEGF released from VSMCs. The level of VEGF was expressed as the percentage of VEGF levels at the control. The values were the mean ± SEM of n = 3. * p < 0.05 vs. control.
Figure 1. The dose-dependent effect of CAPE on the expression of VEGF released from VSMCs. The level of VEGF was expressed as the percentage of VEGF levels at the control. The values were the mean ± SEM of n = 3. * p < 0.05 vs. control.
Applsci 12 02320 g001
Figure 2. CAPE-induced vasorelaxation in porcine coronary artery rings. The relaxation response was expressed as the percentage relaxation of the U46619-induced contraction (100% represents complete relaxation). (a) CAPE’s concentration-dependent relaxation curves (0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 μM) with and without endothelium. (b) CAPE’s concentration-dependent vasorelaxation curves (0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 μM) on U46619-induced vasocontraction with pharmacological inhibitors. The pharmacological inhibitors L-NA (300 μM), indomethacin (10 μM), TEA (10 mM), and ODQ (10 μM) were treated for 30 min before U46619-induced contraction. Values were presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 4). * p < 0.05 vs. (a) without endothelium or (b) control.
Figure 2. CAPE-induced vasorelaxation in porcine coronary artery rings. The relaxation response was expressed as the percentage relaxation of the U46619-induced contraction (100% represents complete relaxation). (a) CAPE’s concentration-dependent relaxation curves (0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 μM) with and without endothelium. (b) CAPE’s concentration-dependent vasorelaxation curves (0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 μM) on U46619-induced vasocontraction with pharmacological inhibitors. The pharmacological inhibitors L-NA (300 μM), indomethacin (10 μM), TEA (10 mM), and ODQ (10 μM) were treated for 30 min before U46619-induced contraction. Values were presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 4). * p < 0.05 vs. (a) without endothelium or (b) control.
Applsci 12 02320 g002
Figure 3. The effect of CAPE on contractile responses. Intact rings were incubated with CAPE (10 and 100 μM) for 5 min before adding U46619 at increasing concentrations. The contraction response was expressed as the percentage of the U46619-induced contraction. Values were expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 3). * p < 0.05 vs. control.
Figure 3. The effect of CAPE on contractile responses. Intact rings were incubated with CAPE (10 and 100 μM) for 5 min before adding U46619 at increasing concentrations. The contraction response was expressed as the percentage of the U46619-induced contraction. Values were expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 3). * p < 0.05 vs. control.
Applsci 12 02320 g003
Figure 4. The effect of a single and simultaneous application of CAPE on cutaneous wound areas in diabetic and nondiabetic mice treated with either saline containing 35% EtOH as control or 5 mM CAPE or 20 μL in saline containing 35% EtOH. (a) Representative photos of wounds in diabetic mice. (b) Group data of wound area expressed as a percentage of the initial wound area. Although the injury in one nondiabetic mice group was untreated, another group was treated with saline containing 35% EtOH. Alternatively, while the wounds in one group of diabetic mice were treated with saline containing 35% EtOH as control, another group was treated with CAPE in saline containing 35% EtOH. The values are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3) per group. * p < 0.05 vs. 35% EtOH of the m+/m+ group and # p < 0.05 vs. 35% EtOH of the db/db group.
Figure 4. The effect of a single and simultaneous application of CAPE on cutaneous wound areas in diabetic and nondiabetic mice treated with either saline containing 35% EtOH as control or 5 mM CAPE or 20 μL in saline containing 35% EtOH. (a) Representative photos of wounds in diabetic mice. (b) Group data of wound area expressed as a percentage of the initial wound area. Although the injury in one nondiabetic mice group was untreated, another group was treated with saline containing 35% EtOH. Alternatively, while the wounds in one group of diabetic mice were treated with saline containing 35% EtOH as control, another group was treated with CAPE in saline containing 35% EtOH. The values are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3) per group. * p < 0.05 vs. 35% EtOH of the m+/m+ group and # p < 0.05 vs. 35% EtOH of the db/db group.
Applsci 12 02320 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, S.-H.; Song, S.-Y.; Park, E.-H.; Kim, E.; Oh, G.C.; Choo, E.H.; Hwang, B.-H.; Chang, K.; Oak, M.-H. Beneficial Effects of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester on Wound Healing in a Diabetic Mouse: Role of VEGF and NO. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2320. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12052320

AMA Style

Park S-H, Song S-Y, Park E-H, Kim E, Oh GC, Choo EH, Hwang B-H, Chang K, Oak M-H. Beneficial Effects of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester on Wound Healing in a Diabetic Mouse: Role of VEGF and NO. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(5):2320. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12052320

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Sin-Hee, Soo-Young Song, Eun-Hye Park, Eunmin Kim, Gyu Chul Oh, Eun Ho Choo, Byung-Hee Hwang, Kiyuk Chang, and Min-Ho Oak. 2022. "Beneficial Effects of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester on Wound Healing in a Diabetic Mouse: Role of VEGF and NO" Applied Sciences 12, no. 5: 2320. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12052320

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop