Oryctolagus Cuniculus Algorithm and Its Application in the Inversion Method of Asteroid Spectra Reflectance Template

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1. The paper is well organized. Though the Oryctolagus Cuniculus algorithm used in the study is the central attraction of the paper, the authors should clarify sufficient motivation of adopting this method particularly in their study.

2. The algorithm deals with sufficient no. of intermediate steps, determine the complexity of the algorithm and give a detailed complexity analysis comparison with other algorithms used in the study.

3. The performance of the algorithm is analyzed on w.r.t. an interesting knapsack problem based objective function and the performance on the basis of convergence is explained, but, justify how superior is this proposed method in comparison to other algorithms.

4. It will be really insightful, if you can add in literature about some other

competing algorithms who perform equivalent to cuniculus algorithm.

5. Also give a theoritical group comparison of other algorithms who accomplishes their task using multiple stages like cuniculus algorithm.

1. In table 1, column name mouth be renamed as month.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In general, the form and the analyses of the problem are correct. The paper has a form of original article. This work deals with the Oryctolagus cuniculus algorithm and its application in the inversion method of asteroid spectra reflectance template.

This manuscript can be accepted for publications after some minor corrections and modifications as given:-

-   In page 1 line 11 , change  (in the abstract section) …we propose …  -----> …we proposed ….

-   In page 1 line 12 , change  The oryctolagus cuniculs … ----->  This …

( The words "oryctolagus cuniculs" are found 17 times during the abstract )

-   In Page 1 line 14, please, rewrite the following sentence to be more simple and clear.

“In the comparison between the new Oryctolagus cuniculus king and the old Oryctolagus cuniculus king, the Oryctolagus cuniculus king is the one with a higher fitness value between the two”

-   The introduction section although it is clear, it is too long .

-   In figure 2, it is better to reduce the distances between the figure and it caption.  Please check it for all the figures in the manuscript.

-   For more clarification, it is better to redraw the figure 3, to appear in a better resolution with a bigger or bold font size.

-   In page 19 line 701, to remove duplication, please, delete the following sentence “The properties of items in the knapsack are listed in Table 4”

-   For more clarification, it is better to redraw the figure 6 to appear in a frame with major and minor grids.  

-   In table 5, there are no values of last column (proportion of maximum value) for the algorithms (GA, PSo and SSA) . Please, comment or write reasons.

-   To support the conclusion, it is better to write the results you got in the conclusion section.

-   In page 21 line 754 , change  (in the conclusion section) …we use the OCA…  -----> … we used the OCA ….

-   In the reference section, please fix the formats of typing for the whole references according to the Journal formats.

For example in references

1. Wang, L.; Cao, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Mirjalili, S.; Zhao, W. Artificial rabbits optimization: A new bio-inspired meta-heuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 2022, 105, 104401.

 2. John H. Holland. The Genetic Algorithm. In Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence, 2nd ed.; Publisher: University of Michigan Press, U.S.A., 1975; Volume 2, pp. 27–67.

 3. Storn, R.; Price, K. Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for Global Optimization over Continuous Spaces. Journal of Global Optimization 1995, 11(4), 341-359.

As mentioned before there are some minor comments in the english language, so please,  revise the whole manscript to be in a good quality of English Language.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf