Next Article in Journal
A Tube Linear Model Predictive Control Approach for Autonomous Vehicles Subjected to Disturbances
Previous Article in Journal
Optimizing the Thickness of Functionally Graded Lattice Structures for High-Performance Energy Absorption: A Case Study Based on a Bicycle Helmet
Previous Article in Special Issue
Apricot Tree Nutrient Uptake, Fruit Quality and Phytochemical Attributes, and Soil Fertility under Organic and Integrated Management
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Fruit Crops Physiology and Nutrition

by
Christos Chatzissavvidis
Laboratory of Pomology-Vegetable Crops-Floriculture, Department of Agricultural Development, School of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Democritus University of Thrace, 682 00 Orestiada, Greece
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(7), 2789; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14072789
Submission received: 25 February 2024 / Accepted: 22 March 2024 / Published: 27 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fruit Crops Physiology and Nutrition)
Fruit crops are among the most intensive agricultural systems in terms of inputs of pesticides and fertilizers, as well as investments in capital and material [1]. However, it is known that perennial crops, such as fruit, have been shown to have energy use, soil erosion, and nitrogen loss rates of less than 5% of the rates of annual crops [2]. The financial benefits of fruit crops are associated with their high yields of very valuable and unique human food products. Fruits are a major source of nutrients and bioactive compounds such as antioxidants [3]. While the genotype of cultivated plants prescribes their production potential, the degree to which these genetic potentials are realized varies depending on the environmental factors that influence the growth metabolism in different ways and ultimately determine vegetation and fruiting [4]. The amounts and ratios of the available inorganic nutrients, in proportion to the needs of the crops at the various phases of development, are factors that can and should be continuously managed [5,6]. It is evident that the application of fertilizers cannot be a straightforward routine task but rather a synthesis of knowledge, experience, and modern technology. Since these are perennial crops, their root layer depth makes it difficult to control and study them in detail, due to the influence of numerous factors that alter the physiology of nutrition each year [7]. The above points demonstrate the importance of understanding the nature of fruit trees’ nutrition problems, as well as the need for continuous information on scientific advances, to enable their prevention and timely treatment [8].
Undoubtedly, important progress has been made in recent decades in understanding the mechanisms of nutrient uptake and their functions in plant metabolism [9,10]. At the same time, there have also been advances in increasing crop yields by supplying mineral nutrients through fertilizer application [11].
The Special Issue “Fruit Crops Physiology and Nutrition” therefore sheds light on some aspects of this multifactorial topic and contributes to its better understanding.
This Special Issue includes five research papers in which different issues of fruit physiology and nutrition are investigated. Τhe papers aim toward the following:
(a)
To gain insight into how cultivation practices (organic vs. integrated) affect the fruit quality (physiological, organoleptic, and phytochemical attributes) and plant nutrition of two apricot cultivars [12]. As is known, conventional, organic, and integrated agriculture are the basic cultural management practices used in the production of foods [13,14]. The results show that the factor “cultivar” had the largest effect on the variables that were measured, and that the factor “farm” also had a significant impact within each cultivation management. The results suggest that there are so many variables that affect the results of a particular cultivation practice that it is difficult to draw general conclusions about which practice is the best. Therefore, the authors state that more research is needed.
(b)
To assess the suitability of alternative nutrient sources/substrates for potted olives [15]. Today, the growth substrate of potted plants is generally based on rather expensive peat mixed with inorganic materials [16]. However, the European Commission in 2001 excluded the issuance of the European ‘Eco-label’ for plants produced with growth substrates containing peat [17]. Moreover, the rapid depletion of peat lands and the consequent environmental concern have led producing countries to limit the exploitation of this natural resource [18]. Therefore, attention to the replacement of peat in growth substrates is increasing. Along these lines, this article reveals that the best performance was recorded in plants grown in a substrate combining sheep manure and litter from evergreen broadleaf species. However, they propose that, in order to obtain more definite findings on the advantageous effects of organic amendments on the nutrition and physiology of olive trees, multi-year field research is required.
(c)
To increase the knowledge of the impacts of salinity stress on pomegranate and strawberry and/or examine ways to alleviate it [19,20]. The negative effects caused by salinity on crops can be mainly summarized in terms of two factors: the osmotic effect and the toxic effect, although in some cases, nutritional alterations can be also observed [21,22]. Dichala et al. [19], experimenting on three pomegranate cultivars that were subjected to salinity stress, suggested that tolerant cultivars are able to exclude salts from the roots [23]; moreover, they have an internal mechanism of tolerance. On the other hand, several approaches have been taken to mitigate the negative effects of salinity on plants, including the use of glycine betaine [24] and microorganisms [25]. In addition, natural zeolites are used as inorganic soil conditioners and are commonly used in agriculture as a silicon source to improve the growth and yield of crops’ productivity under normal or stressful conditions [26,27]. Thus, several studies have mentioned that zeolite can mitigate salt damage in plants [28,29]. Similarly, bentonite has not been tested as extensively, but reports present its beneficial effects on plant growth under salinity stress [30]. In accordance, Ntanos et al. [20] suggested that glycine betaine applied foliarly and a bentonite—zeolite mixture added to the substrate proved to alleviate salinity stress in strawberry plants.
(d)
To address the possibility of alleviating cracking in figs at harvest [31]. Figs (Ficus carica L.) are soft fruits highly susceptible to fruit skin-side cracking and ostiole-end splitting during growth and development [32]. Some plant hormones, such as salicylic acid, have shown positive effects on the fruit quality and the extension of the shelf life [33,34,35]. Herein, the researchers Karantzi et al. [31] concluded that foliar salicylic acid seems to be an inexpensive environmentally friendly agent that enhances the quality and marketability of fig fruit while also making fig harvesting and postharvest handling easier.
The Editor of this Special Issue would like to thank all the authors who accepted invitations and provided their valuable contributions. The Editor is also thankful to MDPI for the collaboration.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mouron, P.; Nemecek, T.; Scholz, R.W.; Weber, O. Management influence on environmental impacts in an apple production system on Swiss fruit farms: Combining life cycle assessment with statistical risk assessment. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 114, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gantzer, C.J.; Anderson, S.H.; Thompson, A.L.; Brown, J.R. Estimating soil erosion after 100 years of cropping on Sanborn Field. J. Soil Water Conserv. 1990, 45, 641–644. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rice-Evans, C.; Miller, N.J. Antioxidants—The case for fruits and vegetable in diet. Br. Food J. 1995, 19, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Angelini, J.; Faviere, G.S.; Bortolotto, E.B.; Arroyo, L.; Valentini, G.H.; Cervigni, G.D.L. Biplot pattern interaction analysis and statistical test for crossover and non-crossover genotype-by-environment interaction in peach. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 252, 298–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Baligar, V.C.; Fageria, N.K.; He, Z.L. Nutrient use efficiency in plants. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2001, 32, 921–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Srivastava, A.K.; Malhotra, S.K. Nutrient management in fruit crops. Indian J. Fertil. 2014, 10, 72–88. [Google Scholar]
  7. Atkinson, D.; Wilson, S.A. The growth and distribution of fruit tree roots: Some consequences for nutrient uptake. Acta Hortic. 1980, 92, 137–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stylianidis, D.C.; Simonis, A.D.; Syrgiannidis, G.D. Nutrition, Fertilization of Deciduous Fruit Trees: Deficiencies, Toxicities, Physiological Disorders of Fruits; Stamoulis Publications: Athens, Greece, 2002. (In Greek) [Google Scholar]
  9. Fageria, N.K.; Baligar, V.C.; Li, Y.C. The role of nutrient efficient plants in improving crop yields in the twenty first century. J. Plant Nutr. 2008, 31, 1121–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dungait, J.A.J.; Cardenas, L.M.; Blackwell, M.S.A.; Wu, L.; Withers, P.J.A.; Chadwick, D.R.; Bol, R.; Murray, P.J.; Macdonald, A.J.; Whitmore, A.P.; et al. Advances in the understanding of nutrient dynamics and management in UK agriculture. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 434, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Marschner, H. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 2nd ed.; Academic Press Ltd.: London, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  12. Roussos, P.A.; Karabi, A.; Anastasiou, L.; Assimakopoulou, A.; Gasparatos, D. Apricot tree nutrient uptake, fruit quality and phytochemical attributes, and soil fertility under organic and integrated management. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Genghini, M.; Gellini, S.; Gustin, M. Organic and integrated agriculture: The effects on bird communities in orchard farms in northern Italy. Biodivers. Conserv. 2006, 15, 3077–3094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Roussos, P.A.; Flessoura, I.; Petropoulos, F.; Massas, I.; Tsafouros, A.; Ntanos, E.; Denaxa, N.-K. Soil physicochemical properties, tree nutrient status, physical, organoleptic and phytochemical characteristics and antioxidant capacity of clementine mandarin (Citrus clementine cv. SRA63) juice under integrated and organic farming. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 250, 414–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chatzistathis, T.; Chatzissavvidis, C.; Papaioannou, A.; Papadakis, I.E. Independent or combinational application of sheep manure and litter from indigenous field vegetation of Quercus sp. influences nutrient uptake, photosynthesis, intrinsic water use efficiency, and foliar sugar concentrations in olive plants (Olea europaea L., cv. “Koroneiki”). Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Papafotiou, M.; Kargas, G.; Lytra, I. Olive-mill waste compost as a growth medium component for foliage potted plants. Hortic. Sci. 2005, 40, 1746–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Regni, L.; Pezzolla, D.; Gigliotti, G.; Proietti, P. The sustainable reuse of compost from a new type of olive mill pomace in replacing peat for potted olive tree. Agron. Res. 2020, 18, 1444–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Alexander, P.D.; Bragg, N.C.; Meade, R.; Padelopoulos, G.; Watts, O. Peat in horticulture and conservation: The UK response to a changing world. Mires Peat 2008, 3, 8. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dichala, O.; Giannakoula, A.E.; Therios, I. Effect of salinity on physiological and biochemical parameters of leaves in three pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 8675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ntanos, E.; Kekelis, P.; Assimakopoulou, A.; Gasparatos, D.; Denaxa, N.-K.; Tsafouros, A.; Roussos, P.A. Amelioration effects against salinity stress in strawberry by bentonite–zeolite mixture, glycine betaine, and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens in terms of plant growth, nutrient content, soil properties, yield, and fruit quality characteristics. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Parihar, P.; Singh, S.; Singh, R.; Singh, V.P.; Prasad, S.M. Effect of salinity stress on plants and its tolerance strategies: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 4056–4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Olmo, A.; Garcia-Sanchez, F.; Simon, I.; Lidon, V.; Alfosea-Simon, M.; Camara-Zapata, J.M.; Martinez-Nicolas, J.J.; Simon-Grao, S. Characterization of the ecophysiological responses of three pomegranate cultivars to salinity. Photosynthetica 2019, 57, 1015–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, M.; Yang, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhu, T.; Wei, X.; Fan, H.; Wang, B. Adaptation mechanism of salt excluders under saline conditions and its applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hamani, A.K.M.; Li, S.; Chen, J.; Amin, A.S.; Wang, G.; Xiaojun, S.; Zain, M.; Gao, Y. Linking exogenous foliar application of glycine betaine and stomatal characteristics with salinity stress tolerance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedlings. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Castaldi, S.; Valkov, V.T.; Ricca, E.; Chiurazzi, M.; Isticato, R. Use of halotolerant Bacillus amyloliquefaciens RHF6 as a bio-based strategy for alleviating salinity stress in Lotus japonicus cv Gifu. Microbiol. Res. 2023, 268, 127274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yuvaraj, M.; Subramanian, K.S. Zeolites application in agriculture. Adv. Life Sci. 2016, 5, 10899–10904. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zheng, J.; Chen, T.; Wu, Q.; Yu, J.; Chen, W.; Chen, Y.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Meng, W.; Chi, D.; Xia, G. Effect of zeolite application on phenology, grain yield and grain quality in rice under water stress. Agric. Water Manag. 2018, 206, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yasuda, H.; Takuma, K.; Fukuda, T. Effect of zeolite on water and salt control in soil. Bull. Fac. Agric. Tottori Univ. 1998, 51, 35–42. [Google Scholar]
  29. Noori, M.; Zendehdel, M.; Ahmadi, A. Using natural zeolite for improvement of soil salinity and crop yield. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2006, 88, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Merino, D.; Iglesias, M.J.; Mansilla, A.Y.; Casalongué, C.A.; Alvarez, V.A. Fighting against plant saline stress: Development of a novel bioactive composite based on bentonite and L-proline. Clays Clay Miner. 2021, 69, 232–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Karantzi, A.D.; Kafkaletou, M.; Tsaniklidis, G.; Bai, J.; Christopoulos, M.V.; Fanourakis, D.; Tsantili, E. Preharvest foliar salicylic acid sprays reduce cracking of fig fruit at harvest. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kong, M.; Lampinen, B.; Shackel, K.; Crisosto, C.H. Fruit skin side cracking and ostiole-end splitting shorten postharvest life in fresh figs (Ficus carica L.) but are reduced by deficit irrigation. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2013, 85, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Baswal, A.K.; Dhaliwal, H.S.; Singh, Z.; Mahajan, B.V.C.; Gill, K.S. Postharvest application of methyl jasmonate, 1-methylcyclopropene and salicylic acid extends the cold storage life and maintain the quality of ‘Kinnow’ mandarin (Citrus nobilis L. × C. deliciosa L.) fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2020, 161, 111064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hazarika, T.K.; Marak, T. Salicylic acid and oxalic acid in enhancing the quality and extending the shelf life of grape cv. Thompson seedless. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2021, 28, 463–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chen, C.; Sun, C.; Wang, Y.; Gong, H.; Zhang, A.; Yang, Y.; Guo, F.; Cui, K.; Fan, X.; Li, X. The preharvest and postharvest application of salicylic acid and its derivatives on storage of fruit and vegetables: A review. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 312, 111858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chatzissavvidis, C. Fruit Crops Physiology and Nutrition. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 2789. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14072789

AMA Style

Chatzissavvidis C. Fruit Crops Physiology and Nutrition. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(7):2789. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14072789

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chatzissavvidis, Christos. 2024. "Fruit Crops Physiology and Nutrition" Applied Sciences 14, no. 7: 2789. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14072789

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop