Next Article in Journal
Prediction of the Adult T-Cell Leukemia Inhibitory Activity of Blueberry Leaves/Stems Using Direct-Injection Electron Ionization-Mass Spectrometry Metabolomics
Previous Article in Journal
Health Beneficial Phytochemicals in Dioscorea caucasica Lipsky Leaves and Tubers and Their Inhibitory Effects on Physiologically Important Enzymes
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Alterations of Content and Composition of Individual Sulfolipids, and Change of Fatty Acids Profile of Galactolipids in Lettuce Plants (Lactuca sativa L.) Grown under Sulfur Nutrition

Plants 2022, 11(10), 1342; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11101342
by Tania T. Körber 1, Noah Frantz 1, Tobias Sitz 1, Muna A. Abdalla 2, Karl H. Mühling 2 and Sascha Rohn 1,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Plants 2022, 11(10), 1342; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11101342
Submission received: 19 April 2022 / Revised: 16 May 2022 / Accepted: 17 May 2022 / Published: 18 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Physiology and Metabolism)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The work presented for review is an interesting approach to the problem of sulfur feeding of plants. The paper presents many valuable chemical analyzes of sulfur, hydroponics, sulfolipids, fatty acid, chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids determinations. The work is written in the correct language and graphically legible. However, doubts are raised by: 1. The authors give abiotic stress as key words, as you can guess it is salt stress caused by a high dose of sulfur, but there are no determinations of salt concentration in the medium and its pH. 2. A single factor experiment where only 2 doses of sulfur were used and no sulfur controls were used. So the whole experience is based on only two doses of sulfur, this is a very narrow scope of research. 3. There is no information on how many years of experience these have been. Only annuals Please indicate the years of the study. 4. The work is based on 53 literature items. Unfortunately, 34 items are older than 10 years and as many as 15 are older than 20 years. 5. Conclusions are unfortunately not well written and insufficient. There is no specific information about the effect of sulfur doses on the parameters tested in plants, e.g. it was not determined whether the effect was positive or negative on the photosynthesis process (line 521). The work is ready for publication, however, after completing the information and redrafting conclusions and supplementing the literature with the latest items.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript entitled "Alterations of Content and Composition of Individual Sulfolipids, and Change of Fatty Acids Profile of Galactolipids in Lettuce Plants (Lactuca sativa L.) Grown under Sulfur Nutrition" written by Korber et al., was very well written an original. It emphasizes the role of S containing compounds including sulfolipids in modulating physiological adjustment mechanisms to improve tolerance ability to various abiotic stresses in plants and consequently, plant food quality. I suggest the acceptace of the paper in the present form.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

This is a well-written manuscript that reported the effects of sulfur nutrition on the content and composition of individual sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol (SQDG) derivatives in green multi-leaf lettuce plants. The study provides insights into the crucial role of sulfur on plant pigments and photosynthetic apparatus. I highly recommend this manuscript for publication.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Accept in present form

Author Response

No further comments.

Back to TopTop